Відео

Anyone can generate several images at the same time. It's due to the batch size slider (not batch count)

@@gohan2091 Thanks

try quad core

@@Hoffmanpack "Why should I try a quad-core!! I currently have a dual-core PC, which is too much faster than an RTX 4090 build

Try nod.ai Shark local installation. That's what I used when I had an AMD 6700 XT. Much faster generation speeds

Or maybe Install Linux on some cheap SSD then use it for the AI stuff. The 7900xt is pretty fast on ROCm even a little bit faster than Shark. You can look at the bench video I made to get an idea.

What is OPT? Do you mean SDP?

​@@gohan2091yeah, --opt-sdp-attention

@@ThunderRockDog yes. That's what I'm using

How much time

@@David-wp4vu All the time that took them to generate all those images + more

I don't know. Are you using A1111 or SD.Net (vlads)? Are you using xformers? Or SDP? what version of python do you have? Are your nvidia drivers updated? Things like that.

@@gohan2091 fixed it... I had an amd previously so i installed a stable difussion version for amd, So I unninstaled everything, And installed the Nvidia's version... So the problem was in the stable difusion software, that wasn't compatible

@@Mente_Fugaz great :) enjoy!

@@Mente_Fugaz how could you tell?

nevermind... it is SD next.

24

Follow the instructions for roop and the reactor github pages. You could also try posing a message on the github pages for help. Make sure you have insightface (I think it's called) installed. Since I already had roop installed first, everything was set up already when I switched extensions to this

I've already made the video. I won't be redoing it, sorry

I hope you can buy one. It's a very nice card for gaming and AI. To save money you don't need to get an Overclocked edition, mine is a standard Zotac.

Lol I don't have a quadro card to test :(

ok friend, great, we still love your videos..@@gohan2091

Sure, ua-cam.com/video/8s8z3Q6AXCs/v-deo.html

You should be using the maximum resolution of the 1.5 model which is usually 512 or 768 pixels. You can latent upscale it by 2x via hi-res fix which just takes seconds. You can generate 4k images via upscaling but as the original generation? It's possible but the results may not be good.

Ty

I Don't understand what you're asking

The 4090 was £1500, the rest of the computer excluding the monitor was around £2500. This is gbp (great British pounds)

Look at the prompt I'm using. Type the prompt you're using here in the chat. Is it the same?

@@gohan2091 A{child|teenager|adult|elderly}{male|female},{Mexican|German|Swedish|American|Japanese|English|Thai}wearing casual in a {mall|park|library|woods|stadium}+,RAW photo,(high detail skin:1.2) 8k uhd, dslr, soft lighting,high quality,film grain, Fujifilm XT3 nsfw,naked,nude,cartoon,painting,illustration,(worst quality,low quality,normal quality:2)BadDream UnrealisticDream

@@qwew789 do you have the dynamic prompt extension installed? You need that to be able to use wildcards and curly brackets

@@gohan2091 i do not have this, thanks for answer👍

What other configuration?

More steps

@@surrealechoai how many? more steps doesn't necessarily mean better quality. I could do some hires fix latent scaler maybe?

​@@gohan2091Could you try next time with 30 steps DPM++ SDE Karras and Hi-Res Fix being 4x Ultra Sharp, at 15? I've seen great results with these settings. What do you think?

Do you have a link to the reddit?

Just tested with SD1.5 for me new driver for 4090 works better. So maybe issue only for old graphic cards.. My result: 1024x1024 100steps, dpm++ 2m sde karras 537.13 -> 6.83 531.79 -> 6.19 Reddit post: New NVidia driver released, with possible slowdown issue resolved?

@@pastuh are you getting similar speeds to what I get on the video if you replicate the settings I used? Just curious

After testing I see my single images generated much faster. Batch 4 faster, 8/16 I would say identical MSI Afterburner set to power limit: 60% Automatic1111 latest update COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--opt-sdp-attention --no-half-vae

@@pastuh interesting. And with the same settings as I'm using? I'm on Vlads fork of A1111. Any ideas why yours is faster? I'm not using xformers either

I don't have SD XL properly setup. I have it installed and it works in A1111 but I tend to use 1.5 models at the moment. It is fast though.

Take a look at the sliders that I adjust in the video. You have batch count and batch size. Batch size is how many images you're generating at the same time. So a batch size of 8 would create 8 images together at the same time. Batch count is how many images you're generating in sequence (one after another). An example, batch count 10, batch size 1 would create 10 images one at a time. Where as batch count 1, batch size 10 would create 1 lot of 10 images (all 10 images created together at the same time).

@@gohan2091 Is there any difference between both methods? I mean, is there any positive side of one method over the other? Thanks!

Also interested if anyone knows @@CyborgMedia

You're welcome. I struggled to find any demonstration like this before buying a 4090 so I thought it would help people see the speed.

@@gohan2091 would you consider having more than 1 on the PC to make it even faster? wondering if it would even fit. I am considering assembling the ultimate mahcine for me for stable diffusion. Can you share the rest your your PC specification?

@@edwincloudusa no, one pc is enough. My PC is 64GB DDR4,, AMD Ryzen 5950X, windows 11.

@@gohan2091He means dual cards I think

@@hansa9159 I don't think dual cards would be sensible. One 4090 is plenty