Michael Sullivan
Michael Sullivan
  • 184
  • 124 486

Відео

Revelation Study Episode #11 Rev. 3:7- 13: We are the Temple / New Jerusalem and we NEVER Go Out
Переглядів 3577 годин тому
Christ came "soon" in AD 70 and we are the New Jerusalem / Temple and we "never" "go out" from her because Christ has saved us and given us eternal life.
Revelation Study Episode #10: Christ Comes as a Thief & Walking w/ God Clothed in His Righteousness
Переглядів 558День тому
Where else does the NT teach that Christ would come as a "thief" and are there clear indicators that this was Christ coming in AD 70? What does it mean to walk with God clothed in His righteous wedding garments.
Thoughts on Gary DeMar and Kim Burgess' Article on 1 Thess. 4:15-17 - the Resurrection
Переглядів 82514 днів тому
We discuss the second exodus and marriage motif in 1 Thess. 4:15-17 and I add Isaiah 4:2-5 to the mix.
Kim Burgess - Addressing his Slander, Cursings & Unwillingness to Answer Questions
Переглядів 1,7 тис.14 днів тому
Kim Burgess continues to slander Full Preterism calling it "full stop AD 70 preterism" and "hyper-preterism" all the while literally cursing us and being incapable of answering crucial questions to his view.
Revelation Study Episode #9: Rev. 2:18-29 Thyatira - Ruling and Shining w/ Christ in the Kingdom
Переглядів 49221 день тому
The "Morning Star" has come and we shine and rule with Him in His Kingdom today.
Guest appearance on "What's the Point Anyway"
Переглядів 1,6 тис.21 день тому
Enjoyed being on Luke's show the other day discussing the topics of my book, "Armageddon Deception" and what is going on in the world today within Zionist eschatology and how God is going to deal with it.
Peter and John's Understanding of the Song of Moses (Deut. 32)
Переглядів 37621 день тому
Preterist Apologetics 12-18-24 Peter and John's Understanding of the Song of Moses (Deut. 32)
How Peter and John follow Moses eschatology in Deuteronomy 32
Переглядів 434Місяць тому
Preterist Apologetics How Peter and John follow Moses' eschatology in Deuteronomy 32
Revelation Study Episode #8: Pergamum Rev. 2: 12-17
Переглядів 678Місяць тому
Our God given faith overcomes the world.
Deuteronomy 32 and Peter
Переглядів 480Місяць тому
Deuteronomy 32 and Peter
Old Covenant "in the land" vs. New Covenant "in Christ" Part #2: Circumcision
Переглядів 1,7 тис.Місяць тому
Old Covenant "in the land" vs. New Covenant "in Christ" Part #2: Circumcision
Revelation Study Episode #7: Partaking of the Tree of Life Rev. 2:7 & Smyrna Rev 2:8-11
Переглядів 605Місяць тому
Revelation Study Episode #7: Partaking of the Tree of Life Rev. 2:7 & Smyrna Rev 2:8-11
Revelation Study Episode #6: Parallels Between Ephesus Rev. 2:1-7 & Ephesians
Переглядів 429Місяць тому
Revelation Study Episode #6: Parallels Between Ephesus Rev. 2:1-7 & Ephesians
1 Thess. 4:15-17 w/ Gary DeMar Part #4: The Thessalonians "caught away" in the "air" in AD 70
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Місяць тому
1 Thess. 4:15-17 w/ Gary DeMar Part #4: The Thessalonians "caught away" in the "air" in AD 70
Armageddon PSYOP Plot & Characters & Special Guest Mark Cochran Producer of First Do No Harm
Переглядів 362Місяць тому
Armageddon PSYOP Plot & Characters & Special Guest Mark Cochran Producer of First Do No Harm
1 Thess 4 with Gary DeMar Part #3: The Contextual Relationship between 1 Thess 4 & 2 Thess. 1-2
Переглядів 2 тис.Місяць тому
1 Thess 4 with Gary DeMar Part #3: The Contextual Relationship between 1 Thess 4 & 2 Thess. 1-2
Armageddon PSYOP The Movie - Plot and Characters w/ Special Guest Christian Producer Mark Cochran
Переглядів 4372 місяці тому
Armageddon PSYOP The Movie - Plot and Characters w/ Special Guest Christian Producer Mark Cochran
Revelation Study Episode #5 : Rev. 1:8-20--The Only One Worthy to Hold the Keys of Death & Hades
Переглядів 1,1 тис.2 місяці тому
Revelation Study Episode #5 : Rev. 1:8-20 The Only One Worthy to Hold the Keys of Death & Hades
OT "in Adam" & "in the Land" Promises vs. NT Fulfillments "in Christ" Episode #1 Seed Promises
Переглядів 7512 місяці тому
OT "in Adam" & "in the Land" Promises vs. NT Fulfillments "in Christ" Episode #1 Seed Promises
Peter and the Song of Moses (Deut. 31:29--32:43) Part #2
Переглядів 1852 місяці тому
Peter and the Song of Moses (Deut. 31:29 32:43) Part #2
Revelation Study Episode #4 Rev. 1:7/Dan. 7:13 Ascension or Soon Second Coming in AD 70
Переглядів 1,1 тис.2 місяці тому
Revelation Study Episode #4 Rev. 1:7/Dan. 7:13 Ascension or Soon Second Coming in AD 70
1 Thess. 4:15-17 Part #2 with Gary DeMar - Laying the Context within 1 Thess. 1, 2, 3, & 5
Переглядів 2,1 тис.2 місяці тому
1 Thess. 4:15-17 Part #2 with Gary DeMar - Laying the Context within 1 Thess. 1, 2, 3, & 5
Preterist Apologetics Review of the Don Preston v Richard Carrier Debate
Переглядів 1692 місяці тому
Preterist Apologetics Review of the Don Preston v Richard Carrier Debate
The Deep State / Rothschild Dynasty Makes its Move
Переглядів 6802 місяці тому
The Deep State / Rothschild Dynasty Makes its Move
Revelation Study Episode #2
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
Revelation Study Episode #2
Revelation Study Episode #:3: Rev 1:3 The "Appointed Time" [Greek kairos] was "Near"
Переглядів 8122 місяці тому
Revelation Study Episode #:3: Rev 1:3 The "Appointed Time" [Greek kairos] was "Near"
Talking God and Politics with Mark Mike and Denise
Переглядів 4462 місяці тому
Talking God and Politics with Mark Mike and Denise
The Song of Moses and Paul
Переглядів 5533 місяці тому
The Song of Moses and Paul
Alex Newman Exposes the Deep State / New World Order / WEF / UN Agenda 2030
Переглядів 8303 місяці тому
Alex Newman Exposes the Deep State / New World Order / WEF / UN Agenda 2030

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @kylearmstrong1188
    @kylearmstrong1188 5 годин тому

    Hey, ask the Trinitarian guy there if Jesus was God the father then why did he say the father is the one with all the authority?

  • @TheBrentfleming
    @TheBrentfleming День тому

    LOVE YOUR DAUGHTER. SNAKES!! I TOLD WARD FENLY I HAD A PET COBRA, ON TOP OF MANY DANGEROUS REPTILES. I DO WANTTO TALK TO MIKE ABOUT THE ROTHSCHILDS.

  • @wally763
    @wally763 2 дні тому

    I believe the New Covenant also contains great and precious promises! It wasn't just the old covenant that made promises to the holy people. The New Covenant was established upon better promises! (Hebrews 8:6-13). God made a New Covenant with the house of Israel forever! We still have promises today! 2 Peter 1:4 4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. That's a promise for today! New Covenant saints have promises too!!!

    • @persiandrum9871
      @persiandrum9871 2 дні тому

      If you are indeed a saint. then you have Christ. If you have Christ, what could you possibly lack? According to scripture, Christ Jesus e is the Temple, he is the Land in which we find our Sabbath rest, he is the Kingdom, he is our manna from Heaven, he is the true vine, he is our Rock, he is our Light, he is our living waters, he is the Resurrection. He is our hope, our deliverer and our salvation. He is our Life (Col 3:4) In Christ there is no more death, no more darkness, no more sorrow, no more condemnation. What other promises could be added, when the saints on Christ already have everything? If you are still looking forward to a new physical land, a new physical temple, a new physical body, a new physical kingdom, etc, then you have not nearly comprehended what is declared in the Good News: _For however many _*_promises_*_ God has made, they all find their “Yes” in connection with him; that is why it is through him that we say the “Amen” when we give glory to God. (2 Cor 1:20)_

    • @wally763
      @wally763 День тому

      1 Corinthians 15:19 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable. We have promises for the AFTERLIFE!

    • @persiandrum9871
      @persiandrum9871 День тому

      ​@@wally763 The 'afterlife' is unquestionable, and it is here now, if you are in Christ. (Eph 5:6). When we shed this mortal, corruptible body, we will be unhindered, and will finally rest in Christ for all eternity. We will have our true life in him. The 'afterlife' is not something which happens later. When at the appointed time the Son of Man was glorified in his _parousia_, when the Old vanished and the New was made manifest, we were all taken to be with the Lord -- past saints, saints of the Lord's contemporaneous generation, and future saints. Even those yet to be born are already known by God. (Eph 1:4; 1 Pet 1:20). God already known those who make up his royal priesthood in his ever-growing kingdom. If you truly believe the words uttered by the Lord Jesus, and if you accept the the scriptures are trustworthy, then there is no 'waiting for more promises'. All is fulfilled. Otherwise, what Good News is there? What compels us to preach the Good News of God's kingdom? With such horrors, pain and suffering in the world, what reason is there to rejoice in Christ? If we -- who trust in the accomplished work and person of Jesus -- have not already passed from death to life (John 5:24), then what is the Good News? Yes, we rejoice, because the Lord has raised us -- who were once dead -- to Life. (Eph 2:1). Keep reading the Good Book. Consider the teaching Mike, Don and other faithful teachers.

    • @wally763
      @wally763 День тому

      ​@@persiandrum9871 I have been listening to Don. That's why I believe in a future hope and promise of dying and going to heaven! I even copied several quotations from Don's comments, debates, and videos. Here are a few of them.... "I do not deny and I have never denied that Christ has a body in heaven." "What is wrong with saying that what we have now is the promise of dying and going to heaven?" "In other words, it's the Most Holy Place, it's in the Presence of God, it is in heaven." "So according to the Hebrews writer, the hope of the Christian is in heaven." "Why people denigrate the awesome wonder of going to heaven to dwell in the Presence of the Savior is beyond me!" "Anyone and everyone that was, by faith, baptized into Christ and became-- becomes-- a child of Abraham and heir according to the promises." "The dead received full entrance into that heavenly city and country. The living received eternal life, so that when they / we die, we likewise enter that heavenly city and country." "It is because those promises are fulfilled that we get to go to heaven when we die, if we are children of God." "Under the Old Law, there was the promise and prophecy of being able, in the time of reformation-- to enter heaven." "As a result of the fulfillment, when the faithful Christian dies, they do go to heaven." "Hey folks, ask yourself the question. What's wrong with Heaven? What is wrong with the Presence of God the Father? What is wrong with the Presence of Jesus in Heaven that is so weak, insufficient, unsatisfying, ungratifying, unfulfilling, that one of these years we got to leave there and come back to live on a ball of dirt?" (End quotes) I hope that helps!

    • @persiandrum9871
      @persiandrum9871 День тому

      ​@@wally763 So then what are or with whom do you have a dispute? No one denies we have a spiritual body in Heaven. We are clothed with Christ, he is our Life. The redeemed saints make up his body. No one here questions this. Not sure what remaining promises you insist that there are left to be delivered. We have all the riches in Christ, now. Granted, we only 'experience' these riches within the confines of our current state. But once this physical, temporal temple of ours has finally fallen, we will comprehend these riches as they really are. _Now we see but a dim reflection, as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face! For now, I know in part; then I shall know [Him] fully, even as I am fully known [by Him]. (1 Corinthians 13:12)_ In the meantime... _The Lord be with your spirit. (2 Timothy 4:22)_

  • @jamesrodrique4998
    @jamesrodrique4998 2 дні тому

    really enjoyed that, thank you coming from a new Preterist believer up in Kapuskasing, Ontario, Canada. I'm also a Native man so don't tell me God is moving today lol... God bless both of yous... and looking for more...

  • @cerickson5256
    @cerickson5256 2 дні тому

    The other verse that is confusing as to wear dead saints went before 70 AD is the thief on the cross - this day you will be with me in Paradise.

  • @janosterud4188
    @janosterud4188 2 дні тому

    Great lesson. Thank You

  • @janosterud4188
    @janosterud4188 2 дні тому

    If wisdom is referred as "her" (Pro 3:15). She is spoken also in Pro 31. I know this is always taught of a woman but is wisdom tied in this Proverb also?

  • @JR-rs5qs
    @JR-rs5qs 3 дні тому

    Shame and honor are still very prevalent in japanese culture

  • @CupOJoeOuttaIdaho
    @CupOJoeOuttaIdaho 3 дні тому

    Hey Mike just a quick question didn't Jesus say that all the prophets had to be killed in Jerusalem? Wouldn't that make the apostles a little bit different because weren't some of them killed outside of Jerusalem? I was just wondering about that little detail. Keep up the great work man!!

  • @JR-rs5qs
    @JR-rs5qs 3 дні тому

    Cool fact- Oikumene is in the Septuagint in several places

  • @kylearmstrong1188
    @kylearmstrong1188 3 дні тому

    Have you guys heard any of shade stones presentations?

  • @cerickson5256
    @cerickson5256 3 дні тому

    Off-topic, but what does Luke 20: 34-38 mean in the preterist viewpoint? I wish there was a place to go and ask all my questions. Everytime I open up my Bible there is something....

    • @JR-rs5qs
      @JR-rs5qs 3 дні тому

      I think I can answer this...I suggest checking out the passage in the interlinear as well because I think some of the translations get it a little wrong. Heaven was not part of the Old Covenant age but it would be part of the New. No one under the Old Covenant had ever gone to Heaven (see John 20); they went to Hades which had a good section (Abraham's Bosom) and a bad part (See the parable in Luke 16). Those who were worthy to rise to Heaven in the New Covenant Age ("the age to come") would be like the angels in Heaven (not married). Let me know if you need further clarification.

    • @cerickson5256
      @cerickson5256 2 дні тому

      @@JR-rs5qs That makes sense, thanks!

    • @JR-rs5qs
      @JR-rs5qs 2 дні тому

      @cerickson5256 it is a great question and one that I had myself. Futurists whiff on it badly.

  • @SiftingPerspective
    @SiftingPerspective 3 дні тому

    1 Peter is so powerful with a FP mindset! it makes what Peter says so clear and consistent compared to a futurist mindset.

  • @euston2216
    @euston2216 3 дні тому

    "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" The Son was indeed forsaken by the Father at the cross. And this is _very_ problematic IF the Father and the Son are two distinct persons.

  • @larrymcnabb2457
    @larrymcnabb2457 3 дні тому

    NKJV uses "quickly" in verse 11 which, according to Strong's, is "tachy" meaning without delay, speedily. So futurists must be linguistic contortionists to think it means 2000+ years to fulfillment. Jesus is NOT a liar!

  • @wally763
    @wally763 3 дні тому

    I believe the New Covenant also contains great and precious promises! It wasn't just the old covenant that made promises to the holy people. The New Covenant was established upon better promises! (Hebrews 8:6-13). God made a New Covenant with the house of Israel forever! We still have promises today! 2 Peter 1:4 4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. That's a promise for today! New Covenant saints have promises too!!!

  • @GRXMotorsPNW
    @GRXMotorsPNW 3 дні тому

    Another good discussion 👍

  • @karen4928
    @karen4928 3 дні тому

    @29:07 Zach states "to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord [Mike]" misquoting Paul as do most. The verse reads "[2Co 5:8 KJV] We are confident, [I say], and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord." The actual words of 2 Corinthians 5:8 provide a different point than what Zach is attempting to counter. Paul is stating a preference, a desire. He is not making an emphatic doctrinal statement about our logistics immediately after death.

    • @JR-rs5qs
      @JR-rs5qs 3 дні тому

      I think Zach was playing tongue in cheek there.

  • @joemoore3056
    @joemoore3056 4 дні тому

    Denise & her comments are good for your program

  • @jayutley8748
    @jayutley8748 4 дні тому

    Glad the wife mentioned the book American Betrayal. Great book on the facts. Our Govt created the situation to get the Japs to attack us. They tried it with Germany but they didn't take the bait. to them, we had to get into the war to save the communists. One of the reasons the Zionists created the problem in Germany so that this situation could happen. They then @funnelled all kinds of weapons and supplies to Russia. WW2 was about lifting up communism than actually stopping Germany. We then turned on the free Chinese and installed the communist over there in 1948.

  • @HopeRivers.7
    @HopeRivers.7 6 днів тому

    EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!

  • @sishrac
    @sishrac 7 днів тому

    For when one says, “I follow Paul,” and another, “I follow Apollos,” are you not being merely human? - 1 Cor. 3: 4

  • @jcbasinger79
    @jcbasinger79 8 днів тому

    should do a video on whiffing sanctification, so us less studied can have it to refute those stuck in the practical (practice) sanctification paradigm

  • @truthseeker4252
    @truthseeker4252 9 днів тому

    Love ya brothers scripturally. But politically??? Just as many good Christ loving brothers are misled by poor interpretation of Scripture, the same goes for the false narratives fes to us from the controlling powers of this world that manipulate us, honest God fearing people, to fall for their divisive dialectics. We're being played.

  • @Blueblight33
    @Blueblight33 9 днів тому

    If the door was shut in 70ad for the 5 foolish virgins how is it open for you 😂. You need a millenium to make sense of the bible 😅

  • @Blueblight33
    @Blueblight33 9 днів тому

    When 2 or 3 gathered together is jesus still among them or was that up to 70? And if he still among them then to do what ?

  • @Blueblight33
    @Blueblight33 9 днів тому

    And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; (Mark 16:17, ESV)

  • @hoodnlott5679
    @hoodnlott5679 9 днів тому

    An interesting thing I noticed when thinking about Lazarus and the rich man. I’m sure others have noticed but Jesus named Lazarus because his name is in the book of life, but the rich man’s name was blotted out.

  • @kylearmstrong1188
    @kylearmstrong1188 10 днів тому

    @MichaelSullivan when Jesus cry's out my God why have you forsaken me he wasn't separating himself from god he was Quoting scripture from psalms 22 it was old testament scripture prophesying the crucifixion of Christ

  • @kylearmstrong1188
    @kylearmstrong1188 10 днів тому

    Trump is a Zionist🤷‍♂️

  • @richardrosas912
    @richardrosas912 10 днів тому

    There seems to be two dynamics to the letters being given to the churches. First off, “the” church in Sardis, may be several groups who gather in separate houses not just one single group. If we think that way then you have to consider multiple pastors, teachers, maybe prophets are being addressed and then the second group is the congregations of these churches being addressed. The leaders need be aware of how they are impacting the body and shepherding the body in all of these places Jesus is addressing.

  • @richardrosas912
    @richardrosas912 10 днів тому

    Jesus appears to John as the high priest in the midst of His body (the churches). We see How Jesus being the true High Priest is very well aware of the issues in the church like a medical examiner diagnosing the health of His body. He is sanctifying His people because wrongful attitudes have crept in, wrongful doctrines and wrongful people. Even though He’s addressing believing churches that doesn’t mean these churches are only believing members. This would have been during the time of the great falling away as well. He warns Sardis that if they do not repent He will come as a thief but this doesn’t mean if they do repent then He wouldn’t come, I believe at “the” coming, His coming wouldn’t be against them as well. The Revelation isn’t meant to warn of Jerusalem’ judgement alone but it was also given for the churches sobriety as believers. This fits the pattern that we see from Peter’s letters, Paul’s letters, James, etc.

  • @june4ljc39
    @june4ljc39 10 днів тому

    Happy happy New Years to everyone, and thank you very much for all your diligent works gentlemen. Hey brother Mike, can i ask that you please review this idea, if it's biblically sound, my Peers! Lord help me, i think i can clarify why it's an erroneous question to ask "can you lose your salvation?". No one has ever lost their salvation, ever. This is why, the old covenant (OC) was a covenant of works and salvation came through Christ in judgment in AD70, Christ in the new covenant (NC) fulfilled the old covenant. We find in Ezekiel 33:14 ff, also in Ezekiel 18:21 -22, 24 "But if a wicked person TURNS AWAY from all his sins that he has committed and keeps all my statutes and does what is just and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die. 22 None of the transgressions that he has committed shall be remembered against him; for the righteousness that he has done he shall live. 24 But when a righteous person TURNS AWAY from his righteousness and does injustice and does the same abominations that the wicked person does, shall he live? None of the righteous deeds that he has done shall be remembered; for the treachery of which he is guilty and the sin he has committed, for them he shall die." THERE IT IS!!! The idea of "turning away" is where the so-called "lose his salvation" idea comes from, but it has not been adjudicated yet... he is not saved yet, he is waiting in Hades, he will be judged on his works, which only comes in AD70 when his verdict will be determined. He was never saved, he never lost anything. But his acts of righteousness will count for nothing if he "turns away" and does evil. You see it! This is not applicable in the new covenant. Ezekiel teaches how they could "turn away" (lose their salvation, which he has not earned yet) from works of righteousness and be saved at the judgment of the old covenant Israel (the body of the dead ones, the OC body, the lowly body, body singular in original text, see Philippians 3:21). This law/concept is NOT applicable in the new covenant, because in the NC God is the Author and Finisher of our faith/salvation. Nothing can pull us away from the love of God (Romans 8:35). It seems the law of the OC, covenant of works, which a man becomes righteous and then unrighteous (transgressor) to be judged at the end of the age only applies to the OC Israelites. So in the OC, you could act one way and then act another way, offer acceptable sacrifices and be righteous again. That's not how it "works" in the New Covenant. The issue seems to be in the 40 years transition period when both covenants overlapped, after the resurrection, during the Millennium, the second exodus, some Jews believed in Christ and were saved at that time, namely before the judgment. During this time, many were simply followers of Christ, those who loved Christ' teachings and tasted of the good things of the Spirit, but obviously "were not of us", meaning they were not believers. The type who does not accept our Lord as their God and Savior. They look the part, because they learn from Christ but are not believers. THOSE, they are the ones who "turn away" like Ezekiel said. Backsliding and turning away is a typical characteristic of the old covenant way. Therefore, everyone who has ever believed in Christ as their Lord and Savior has never ever lost their salvation, it's not covenantally possible. We got in because of the Father's gift to His Son, Christ's purchase sealed the deal, nothing can take that away from God and His Christ, nothing, no one can turn away. I know the stories of the "fallen pastors" and the rest of the horror stories of the so-called believer who played the part very well, then "turned away" but they did not belong to us (1 John 2:19). They played the part and rejected the Light. We are misapplying the laws of the covenants in the 40 year overlap and confusing the laws, putting the new wine in the old skins, that's a no!-no! So, in the OC, men turned one way and then turned another way, just like after the Exodus in the wilderness, they did not keep faith, rather turned to the gods of Egypt, but in the NC it's by God's grace and Christ obedience to fulfill the Mosaic Law by which He has purchased the redemption for His glorious body (Philippians 3:21), namely the church that men were giving His Righteousness to our sin-debt account. NOT by works but by faith alone in Christ alone, this God-man who alone saves men. 1 John 5:1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father also loves those born of Him. God gives life and God does not make mistakes and does not take it away.

  • @GRXMotorsPNW
    @GRXMotorsPNW 11 днів тому

    Wow! Off Topic but Kim Iverson just opened up a can of worms by asking on her recent video "was Jesus a Jew?" And she related it to Zionism, Gaza, Israel, America and Zionist Christians in Congress like Mike Johnson and others! America needs Preterism more than ever to turn the political ship around 180° This is a political and foreign policy state of EMERGENCY

  • @GRXMotorsPNW
    @GRXMotorsPNW 11 днів тому

    I have two issues with what you folks are teaching. #1) I do not see why it's necessary to be a Calvinist to be a Full-Preterist. It seems to me you can embrace libertarian freewill and remain a Full-Preterist. #2) Although I have not heard Mike teach on this, it seems to me that Old Earth Creationism and Intelligent Design is a much better fit with Full-Preterism than Young Earth Creationism! Maybe Mike can offer clarification. Thx

    • @marcinnowak5258
      @marcinnowak5258 11 днів тому

      I am not a Calvinist but consider myself to be a preterist

    • @sishrac
      @sishrac 10 днів тому

      @@marcinnowak5258 Same

    • @mikeworsley1773
      @mikeworsley1773 10 днів тому

      Old earth presuppositions and bacteria to babies evolution could make God a Deist: 4 billion years of twiddling His thumbs before He did something. If Adam came from already existing nations then we are most likely not descended from him and the doctrine of original sin is lost.

    • @duaneking273
      @duaneking273 7 днів тому

      Amen on not being Calvinist. Pretersim is what moved me from Calvanism once I understood covenant relationship, and then read Rev 21:6-7 6 And he said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life WITHOUT PAYMENT! 7 The one who conquers will have this heritage, and I will be his God and he will be my son. The one who conquers. Takes on life with God. Not the one who is now elected. The call is to anyone and everyone. Sovereignty over truth and judgement does not mean Sovereignty over all of men’s choices.

    • @sishrac
      @sishrac 7 днів тому

      @@mikeworsley1773 There is a scriptural allusion to existing mankind pre-Adam, the ancestor of Noah from whom we all descended. Sin and its repercussions in the world is a fact. But bacteria to babies' evolution taking 4 billion years is a pre-supposition, not a fact. Why factor a hypothesis into Old Earth Creationism and Intelligent Design? Why not remain in an open-ended state of 'I don't know.' "Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise." - 1 Cor. 3: 18

  • @GRXMotorsPNW
    @GRXMotorsPNW 11 днів тому

    At the 31min 45 sec mark Mike correctly says how 70AD was not only relevant to earthly things it was absolutely essential to what was going on in Heaven! Remember in Job how Satan was roaming the earth, how he was accessing the Throne of God and making accusations against those who feared the Lord. That whole dynamic and relationship changed at The Cross, The Resurrection and at AD70. A point NEVER talked about by End Times teachers.

  • @deborahrosefistner6421
    @deborahrosefistner6421 11 днів тому

    Sadly most churches today are entertaining the goats instead of feeding the sheep. 😢

  • @donnacassity9292
    @donnacassity9292 11 днів тому

    One of the best theological discussions I’ve heard in a long time.

  • @julieroberts1196
    @julieroberts1196 12 днів тому

    This was brilliant. I have the same mindset and views as both of you and I am well aware of the NWO and the nefarious intentions towards mankind, but, preterism gives me hope. Great listening to you both.

  • @deedledee6717
    @deedledee6717 12 днів тому

    I love Mike, but his faith in Trump just blows my mind. I wish he would do more research on the Noahide Laws and realize how big a role Trump is playing to help usher these laws in. He’s surrounded by Zio’s because he is 💯 one, himself.

  • @allrighteousness4348
    @allrighteousness4348 12 днів тому

    Mike Sullivan! Think carefully about what you said make you to disagree with what Kim Burgess believe regarding OT dead and NT dead. The reason you state for your disagreement is a big confusion because of what you and FP believe. I agree that Kim Burgess is in great errors and his belief in PP is fraudulent. If Mike Sullivan doesn't respond to this comment I will expose here his fallacy!!!!

    • @allrighteousness4348
      @allrighteousness4348 11 днів тому

      Mike Sullivan! If the millennium began when Christ bound the strong man and according to Rev 20 the martyrs were raised and reigning with Christ, which Martyrs were raised at the parousia??????

  • @TrevorDowns007
    @TrevorDowns007 12 днів тому

    Prayers. We know by their fruits. Fruits is not theology...it is an attitude of thankfullness and long suffering. "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law" I love jumping around trying to find the "true theologies" I appreciate those like you and Don who have the fruits, while defending debating any certain theology.

  • @TheWorldWeLiveIn_Max
    @TheWorldWeLiveIn_Max 12 днів тому

    So Mike, are you CC?

  • @EricDavidHall
    @EricDavidHall 12 днів тому

    This ad70 doctrine is formulated around the assumption that Cyrus Christ and the Pax Persica never happened.

  • @quellolopez9384
    @quellolopez9384 12 днів тому

    Loved this episode. Thank you, Brothers. Blessings.

  • @real82it
    @real82it 13 днів тому

    Didn’t the idea of the rapture and dispensationalism start far before Schofield?? Hasn’t the Albert Pike letter been found to be fake? I am still deciding where I stand on preterism, but citing these things as part of your argument does not strengthen it.

    • @ShadowofTheAlmighty
      @ShadowofTheAlmighty 5 днів тому

      True preterists do not base their core beliefs on such things...they base it on "Sola scriptura".😉

  • @ShadowofTheAlmighty
    @ShadowofTheAlmighty 13 днів тому

    Good form, brother!😉

  • @theres_noplacelike_home
    @theres_noplacelike_home 13 днів тому

    This was amazing. I remember when I learned the truth about Scofield and the Rothschilds. Yikes. Most Christians I know would never believe it, even if you put the evidence right in front of them.

  • @Godismybanner6877
    @Godismybanner6877 13 днів тому

    So does this dude think that God is just going to allow the world to get more and more satanic without correcting it? What kind of God is that?

    • @ShadowofTheAlmighty
      @ShadowofTheAlmighty 5 днів тому

      It's your assumption that that's what is happening... because you don't see God's sovereign nature in the OT, and remember that He changes NOT, He is the same yesterday, today and forever. 👉Isa 45:7, Amos 3:6, Job 2:10, Lam 3:38, Deut 32:39, 1 Sam 2:6-7, Ecc 7:14.👈

    • @Godismybanner6877
      @Godismybanner6877 5 днів тому

      @ no I believe Jesus Christ is coming and he’s gonna whip some butt

  • @ronmalley
    @ronmalley 13 днів тому

    Wow I want so very much to see it like you do I love this thkq Mike ur amazing and mind blowing 🤯