Відео

@@coreyluffler7797 that is excellent advice! I really like your idea to profile a specific character, as you mentioned the Canadian CDR. I’ve been starved for feedback and this provides more than enough to enhance quality moving forward, thanks!

@@SammieLake68 Hi Sammie! Thanks for dropping in.

Well, I don't disagree, War is simply a business, more so now than in 1982 even...

Thanks for the tips, I will implement. Great feedback

@@ski8799 thank you for you response, but if you need any help plz tell and I will help you

Thanks Sir, I appreciate the feedback.

Correct Sir.

Thanks it's as you have said Falklands.

@topbanana4013, thank you for the correction, you are 100% correct. I would appreciate your review of some of my other material as well to ensure accuracy, if so inclined, thanks..

@@mickrap6001 apologies, you are all correct...

Thank you Sir

Incorrect

Logically the the Island is British…From a legal and practical standpoint, the Islands are currently governed by the UK as a British Overseas Territory. The UK asserts sovereignty based on historical presence and administration of the islands since 1833. It’s British, how can it not be British?

​@@SnakePliskin762Explain.

@@fatladattheback8642 read the above comment plus the fact it has an entirely British population which wants to stay British.

no estoy de acuerdo, pero, gracias

Argentina will never occupy the Falklands. Enough said.

I’ll do better next go round, please advise

Don't be embarrased please. It was a lot more complicated than that. Have you read the book or seen the film 'Missing' with Sissy Spacek? 1973 and U.S. influence in South American affairs starting in Chile, Allende, Pinochet and all. Ironically (?) the film was released in February 1982 , 2 months before the invasion. The USA was between a rock and a hard place. Jean Kirkpatrick, Ronald Reagan's foreign policy advisor supported authoritarian governments as long as they followed US 'advice'. The Falklands War was the last thing the U.S. government wanted. Haig was just a figurehead and the public face of intermediacy. He did his job while the real work was being done. 🙂

@@carlteacherman194 Nice of you to say...but, the US stayed out of the Falklands Conflict so as to not "irritate" it's South American neighbors ...shamefully ignoring the rightful contender.

there is a document that states any foreigner country who invades any country from the AMERICAS...........the usa WILL retaliate. ..../ BUT IN THIS CASE THE USA DIDN'T DO SHIT.............../

Funny😂 just like Argentina recovered democracy after the junta collapsed because it started then lost its own war of aggression and conquest.

@@lukemcgahern2357 It´s not funny. Argentina did NOT "conquer" but "recovered" our own territory occupied by the UK in 1833 when the latter invaded and expelled our governor and our settlers. It didn´t "attack" since it didn´t kill or mistreat kelpers or British soldiers. (The amphibious commandos had express orders not to cause casualties to the Royal Marines). And they complied with it. If Argentina had wanted the war then it should have exterminated those 100 Royal Marines and expelled all the kelpers. Wait until the end of the year for Thatcher to sell her aircraft carriers and to receive the other 5 Exocets. But you sank the Crucero Belgrano and so we had to fight. They should not have spent more than 150 years of uninterrupted possession in 1982 and they did not. There is no current international legal backing to legitimise their occupation of our territory.

@@magolandia1 the first reported sighting was by English navigator Captain John Davis in 1592. the Islands were entirely unoccupied until 1765, when they were first claimed by the British who established a garrison at Port Egmont. Over the years, the British, French and Spanish periodically had garrisons within the Islands until 1811 when all were withdrawn. On 6 October 1832, an Argentine military garrison arrived in an attempt to establish sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, disregarding the British claim of 67 years prior. Less than three months later, on 2 January 1833, the Royal Navy evicted the military base with no loss of life. The civilian population, who had sought permission from Britain to live there, were invited to stay. A year later, a small, permanent British administration was established and in 1845 Stanley become the capital. Hahaha you did not “mistreat” the islanders or soldiers? I would call mounting an amphibious invasion then attempting to kill naval party 8901 and Falklands defence force mistreating the kelpers and soldiers. You dissolved there democratic government. Let’s list what else you did ,you renamed the islands and it capital city after your own country and make the kelpers speak Spanish all of which is an attack on there culture ,identity and history. You banned there flag and outlawed the Falklands defence force and made resistance and owning firearms a crime. identification papers, curfews, compulsory blackouts, confiscation of radios and cameras, requisitioning of Land-Rover 4x4 vehicles and soldiers breaking into abandoned houses to steal furniture to use as firewood. Residents considered critical of the Argentines were expelled from the islands. This included Bill Luxton whose family had been resident in the Falklands since the 1840s and the editor of the Falkland Islands Times David Colville.This proved embarrassing in the international press and so 14 residents of Stanley considered to be potential troublemakers were imprisoned and were sent to Fox Bay East and placed under house arrest. 114 inhabitants of Goose Green were imprisoned in the social hall until released by the British following the Battle of Goose Green. Major Patricio Dowling, an Argentine of Irish origin, became the chief of police. He frequently overstepped his authority, ignoring instructions to treat the islanders with respect, and quickly became known throughout the islands for his tendency to resort to violence. Dowling imposed a regime of arbitrary house searches, arrests and questioning. His actions came to the attention of Comodoro Carlos Bloomer-Reeve who recommended to Brigadier-General Menéndez that he be removed and he was subsequently sent back to the mainland in disgrace. Argentine officers did steal civilian property at Goose Green following the detention of the civilian population

@@lukemcgahern2357 The first occupier of the Malvinas Islands was the Frenchman Louis Antoine de Bougainville, who established a colony on Soledad Island. When Spain learned of the French presence in the Malvinas, it protested and demanded its surrender. The two countries were bound by the Family Pact. The Marquis de Grimaldi demanded that his French counterpart, the Duke de Choiseul, hand over the colony, Port Louis. Choiseul agreed and ordered Bougainville to arrange the transfer of the colony in Madrid. The transfer of the colony took place on 1 April 1767 and Felipe Ruiz Puente was appointed as the first Spanish governor of the islands, dependent on the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. From 1767 there had been a continuous exercise of Spanish jurisdiction through a succession of 32 resident governors in the islands, dependent on Buenos Aires, until 1811 when Spain withdrew the garrison (leaving signs of possession) in the context of the War of Independence in the Río de la Plata.

In 1764 the United Kingdom decided to undertake an expedition to the Falkland Islands, which was conducted with the utmost secrecy to avoid further Spanish protests. The expedition was led by John Byron, and the crew only learned of their true destination when they left their last port of call in Brazil. On 11 January 1765 he sighted Gran Malvina Island and established his provisional base at a place he named Port Egmont, after the then First Lord of the Admiralty. Byron made no settlement, leaving only a small orchard which would later be used as proof of possession.

Because Argentina always claimed the Malvinas Islands and Great Britain never sat down to negotiate. UN Resolution 1514 In its sixth paragraph, referring to the principle of territorial integrity, the resolution establishes that "any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations", establishing a clear position that where the territorial integrity of States is at risk, the application of self-determination should not be resorted to.

UN Resolution 2065 On December 16, 1965, the General Assembly adopted resolution 2065 -the first one exclusively referring to the Malvinas Question-, through which it recognized the existence of a sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom and invited both countries to negotiate in order to find a peaceful solution to the controversy. The importance of this resolution lies in the fact that it establishes the essential elements that define the Question and - consequently - the way in which it should be solved. These are: That the case of the Malvinas Islands is one of the forms of colonialism that must be put to an end. That this case involves a sovereignty dispute between the Argentine and British governments. That the way to find a solution is through bilateral negotiations between both governments. These negotiations should take into account the principles and purposes of the Charter and resolution 1514 (XV), as well as the interests of the population of the islands. It is important to note that resolution 2065 (XX) indicates that in the negotiations to find a solution to the dispute, the interests of the inhabitants of the islands must be taken into account, and not their wishes, excluding the application of self-determination in this particular case.

Interesting, a 1977 attempt, was that before the Junta seized power?

@@ski8799 The Argentine military dictatorship took power in1976. Videla deposed Isabel Péron. Galtieri gained control in 1981. Their history is a huge read together with U.S. 'involvement' in South American affairs...

@@ski8799 Operation Journeyman ua-cam.com/video/hKZje8oERcU/v-deo.html

@@carlteacherman194 fascinating, thank you, I will read more...

Wow, impressive fleet and AA review. Excellent info on the Harrier serviceability rate, that’s very interesting. Mind if I use some of this information in subsequent installments?

Sorry that this rattled you, I shall adjust my accuracy and level of detail so as not to upset you further...cheers...

Cuanto daño nos hizo ese tipo 😮

Jacob, I’m doing great! Hope that you are well, thanks for checking in, take care.

And this one -- ua-cam.com/video/vh5Z6MgxTsk/v-deo.html

Excellent point about the Argentine approach to the Falklanders.

Si yo voy y TE ROBO ( eso hizo Gran bretaña en 1833) como me tratarias vos...y otra cosa no creo q en 1982 hayan tratado como basura a esos USURPADORES llamados kelpers es mas creo q fueron tratado hasta con exeso de amabilidad x las tropas Argentinas...

I was 12 at the time. It was on the news every evening and I remember looking up these locations in the family encyclopedia.

Pedantically, they actually belong to the people in St Malo in France. Les Iles Malouines = Islas Malvinas.

Why? Because Argentine is the nearest state? By that token Belgium belongs to France, Germany to Poland ... Your argument is bizarre.

@@tonyves Not bizarre at all. Nothing at all to do with 'being the nearest state'! Not sure where you're coming from here. I wish people would do some research, as I did before embarking on 'Maggie's Illustrious South Atlantic tours'... 😏 Argentina call the islands "Islas Malvinas" which is the Spanish translation from French of "Les Iles Malouines". A Malouine is an inhabitant of the city of St. Malo in Brittany, France. Louis-Antoine de Bougainville was invloved in conquering the islands for Louis 15th and set up a trading company with people from St Malo settling on one part of islands. The British under Captain John Strong navigated another part. The Spanish fought and gained control of some parts from the French. Even the Dutch became involved! The true 'ownership' of these islands is complicated. For more information you can read here in French but easily translated. www.axl.cefan.ulaval.ca/amsudant/Falkland.htm

⁠the true ownership in not completed at all. Britain was the first to meaningfully settled the islands it was then a crown colony until 1982 when it became a British overseas territory and achieved self government then in a free and fair democratic international monitored referendum the population chose 99.9% to remain a British overseas territory.🇬🇧🇫🇰🇬🇸

​@@tonyvesResoluciones de la ONU.

I'm british.

Las Malvinas se autogobiernan y ya no son una colonia de Gran Bretaña. Son independientes y eligen por sí mismos. Muy parecido a Taiwán.

@@scootergrant8683 que equivocado que estás....y porque gran bretaña tiene un presupuesto asignado para mantener las islas???? Infórmate y después hablas....aparte de tener una base militar....de gran bretaña ahí....infórmate....

@@Midlandcapo Las Malvinas tienen el control total de sus propias compras militares. Aunque es parte de Gran Bretaña, en la práctica el archipiélago funciona y se financia por sí mismo. La base militar solo está financiada por Gran Bretaña porque las islas no pueden permitírselo. No veo nada malo en tener una base militar. Todo buen país los tiene si los quiere.

Because Argentina took the islands by force instead of sitting at a table and talking about it its going to make Britain want to keep control of the islands more.

​@@scootergrant8683The people there are British or of British decent and want to remain so.

😍😍

Walkers!

El uso de la palabra 'invadir' se basa únicamente en la perspectiva. En este contexto, se está utilizando correctamente.

@@scootergrant8683 estás equivocado....deben corregir ese error!!!... saludos

@@imerastrojerodiesel9393 ¿Qué dije mal? ¿Qué cosas hay que corregir? Estás diciendo muchas cosas sin aportar nada. Decir que algo está mal sin material detrás no es un argumento muy fuerte.

@@scootergrant8683 estimado....no hay argumento para poner ese título de video...."invadir" está mal....

@@imerastrojerodiesel9393 Te das cuenta que eres un hispanohablante corrigiendo y un angloparlante en el uso del inglés. Si hay algo mal con la palabra, entonces diga qué tiene de malo. no solo digas que es

Falklands

Absolutely, the Falklands are doing well. Argentina, not so much.

Islas Malvinas = Iles Malouines - Vive la France. 😂

Argentina can be nuked very easy