Falkland Islands War_Argentina Invades
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
- This second installment of the Falkland Islands War covers the Argentine invasion of the Falklands at Port Stanley on April 2, 1982. This discussion is focused on Britain's response with an overview of international action(s).
Personally l would hope you would try to get a little more detail and accuracy into your subsequent accounts. Rex Hunt did not “immediately surrender” after the invasion. A prolonged fire fight ensued and at least 3 Argentine commandos (probably more)were killed, the same thing happened on South Georgia. The Falklands were not given up without a fight and were rightly retaken weeks later.
Thanks for the information RE: the early days of the invasion. Will update.
es increíble la cantidad de errores que pudiste condensar en 3 líneas de texto, es hasta asombroso.
@@OttoVonBismarck7 Could you perhaps explain the errors you mentioned (as I have done) waiting with anticipation!.
@@CR-yd4qe No soy tu docente de historia, no tengo ni tiempo ni ganas de detenerme a explicar , queda en vos estudiar por tu cuenta.
@@OttoVonBismarck7 Your first reply told everyone that you are not a history teacher. There was no need to say it in your second one.
The British did the absolute impossible.
I'm british.
Because Argentina tried to take the Falkland islands by force instead of sitting down at a table and talking about its going to make the UK want to keep them more.
Because Argentina always claimed the Malvinas Islands and Great Britain never sat down to negotiate.
UN Resolution 1514
In its sixth paragraph, referring to the principle of territorial integrity, the resolution establishes that "any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations", establishing a clear position that where the territorial integrity of States is at risk, the application of self-determination should not be resorted to.
UN Resolution 2065
On December 16, 1965, the General Assembly adopted resolution 2065 -the first one exclusively referring to the Malvinas Question-, through which it recognized the existence of a sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom and invited both countries to negotiate in order to find a peaceful solution to the controversy.
The importance of this resolution lies in the fact that it establishes the essential elements that define the Question and - consequently - the way in which it should be solved. These are:
That the case of the Malvinas Islands is one of the forms of colonialism that must be put to an end.
That this case involves a sovereignty dispute between the Argentine and British governments.
That the way to find a solution is through bilateral negotiations between both governments.
These negotiations should take into account the principles and purposes of the Charter and resolution 1514 (XV), as well as the interests of the population of the islands.
It is important to note that resolution 2065 (XX) indicates that in the negotiations to find a solution to the dispute, the interests of the inhabitants of the islands must be taken into account, and not their wishes, excluding the application of self-determination in this particular case.
I was living and working in Scotland at the time and as an American I was embarrassed and saddened by the US failure to support its most important ally. The US contributed some Intelligence and minor material support but it should have done more to assist a fellow NATO member. Haig was a total failure.
Don't be embarrased please. It was a lot more complicated than that. Have you read the book or seen the film 'Missing' with Sissy Spacek? 1973 and U.S. influence in South American affairs starting in Chile, Allende, Pinochet and all. Ironically (?) the film was released in February 1982 , 2 months before the invasion. The USA was between a rock and a hard place. Jean Kirkpatrick, Ronald Reagan's foreign policy advisor supported authoritarian governments as long as they followed US 'advice'. The Falklands War was the last thing the U.S. government wanted. Haig was just a figurehead and the public face of intermediacy. He did his job while the real work was being done. 🙂
@@carlteacherman194 Nice of you to say...but, the US stayed out of the Falklands Conflict so as to not "irritate" it's South American neighbors ...shamefully ignoring the rightful contender.
there is a document that states any foreigner country who invades any country from the AMERICAS...........the usa WILL retaliate. ..../ BUT IN THIS CASE THE USA DIDN'T DO SHIT.............../
I know every one goes on about the war, but britain saved possibly thousands of argitine lives by taking them back, imagine if the junta goverment stayed in charge, thousands of argintine lives lost cause they didnt beleive in the junta cause.
Maybe you should reflect on the cliched 'untrained Argentine conscripts'. A large proportion were not. They were well-trained professional soldiers who had been preparing and practising for many years. The invasion of the Falkland Islands was something that had been enshrined in Argentine military training whether enlisted or conscripted. A previous serious invasion attempt was thwarted in 1977.
Interesting, a 1977 attempt, was that before the Junta seized power?
@@ski8799 The Argentine military dictatorship took power in1976. Videla deposed Isabel Péron. Galtieri gained control in 1981.
Their history is a huge read together with U.S. 'involvement' in South American affairs...
@@ski8799 Operation Journeyman ua-cam.com/video/hKZje8oERcU/v-deo.html
@@carlteacherman194 fascinating, thank you, I will read more...
They did not surrender immediately.. There was a gun battle and men died in it before the surrender.. Why on earth start a video on the war and stuff up within the first few sentences of dialogue.. You help perpetuate the belief all over the world that Americans are ignorant of world history.. Give up on making Historical video's until you actually make an effort to LEARN ABOUT HISTORY..
Sorry that this rattled you, I shall adjust my accuracy and level of detail so as not to upset you further...cheers...
Great vídeo 👍
🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷Son Argentinas! 1982 fue un acto de un proceso de recuperacion que no ha concluido.❤❤❤
The usurping criminals are under criminal proceedings for robbery, so their arguments are neither morally nor ethically valid, nor do they conform to UN resolutions. Argentina is in the process of recovering the Malvinas Islands, in 1982 there has been an act in such a sense that although it has been the most visible, we must remember that it is not the first nor the last. Argentina is the 8th largest country in the world, which is home to many Argentine citizens native to the Malvinas Islands who have been expelled from that territory by the current gang of criminals that occupies it. There are also thousands of descendants of natives living in Argentina who are violently exiled for declaring themselves Argentines. All the parents of the occupants of the Malvinas Islands have married on the Argentine mainland and have all their relatives living on the Argentine mainland. All of them, thousands and thousands, are not allowed any right of expression and have been excluded and INVISIBLE from the entire FALSE English narrative of false elections. As if the criminals could also keep the stolen goods. Hopefully when the nuclear war breaks out with China and Russia, etc.. come as they have done in every world war to Argentina that will give them shelter as it has always done.🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷❤❤❤❤🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
Argentina will never occupy the Falklands. Enough said.
Malvinas Argentinas ayer hoy y siempre....🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷 Basta de colonialismo.....basta de piratas...
Las Malvinas se autogobiernan y ya no son una colonia de Gran Bretaña. Son independientes y eligen por sí mismos. Muy parecido a Taiwán.
@@scootergrant8683 que equivocado que estás....y porque gran bretaña tiene un presupuesto asignado para mantener las islas???? Infórmate y después hablas....aparte de tener una base militar....de gran bretaña ahí....infórmate....
@@Midlandcapo Las Malvinas tienen el control total de sus propias compras militares. Aunque es parte de Gran Bretaña, en la práctica el archipiélago funciona y se financia por sí mismo. La base militar solo está financiada por Gran Bretaña porque las islas no pueden permitírselo. No veo nada malo en tener una base militar. Todo buen país los tiene si los quiere.
Because Argentina took the islands by force instead of sitting at a table and talking about it its going to make Britain want to keep control of the islands more.
@@scootergrant8683The people there are British or of British decent and want to remain so.
MANUELA ESCOBAR RESURFACING FIRST TIME EVER BIRMINGHAM UK HUMANITARIAN PLEAS SOS
Love Argentina 🇦🇷 From America 🇺🇸
El título esta mal.... uno no invade territorio que te pertenece!!! saludos
El uso de la palabra 'invadir' se basa únicamente en la perspectiva. En este contexto, se está utilizando correctamente.
@@scootergrant8683 estás equivocado....deben corregir ese error!!!... saludos
@@imerastrojerodiesel9393 ¿Qué dije mal? ¿Qué cosas hay que corregir? Estás diciendo muchas cosas sin aportar nada. Decir que algo está mal sin material detrás no es un argumento muy fuerte.
@@scootergrant8683 estimado....no hay argumento para poner ese título de video...."invadir" está mal....
@@imerastrojerodiesel9393 Te das cuenta que eres un hispanohablante corrigiendo y un angloparlante en el uso del inglés. Si hay algo mal con la palabra, entonces diga qué tiene de malo. no solo digas que es
Viva Malvinas...Viva argentina..
Falklands
Absolutely, the Falklands are doing well. Argentina, not so much.
Islas Malvinas = Iles Malouines - Vive la France. 😂
Argentina can be nuked very easy
...to cover up British government incompetentence but most of all, to save Thatcher.
I don't disagree with you, would certainly merit more discussion...cheers
@@ski8799 Absolutely. You will.amazed at what was covered up.
HMS Sheffield sunk by the Navy after the missile attack when nuclear depth charges started to cook off.
She did not detect the Exocet as her primary radar was switched off on orders of Northwood.
Sir Galahad. 57 men died at Bluff Cove because their OC refused an order from Royal Marines Ewan Major to come ashore as there were Argie spotters on the hillside. When the Skyhawks found her many watching a soccer video.
@@sunrayisdown1690 you are very knowledgeable, look forward to continuing the discussion knowing contributors like you are watching.
was it not thatcher who saved the falkland islanders themselves..have you asked any of the inhabitants on the islands their sentiments to mrs thatcher..maybe the uk govt should not of bothered according to your logic.
Ireland supported Argentina
😍😍
Walkers!
FUERON A PURO DAR
LASTIMA
LOS PURA BOCA
But to sincere this islands belong to Argentina
Pedantically, they actually belong to the people in St Malo in France. Les Iles Malouines = Islas Malvinas.
Why? Because Argentine is the nearest state? By that token Belgium belongs to France, Germany to Poland ... Your argument is bizarre.
@@tonyves Not bizarre at all. Nothing at all to do with 'being the nearest state'! Not sure where you're coming from here.
I wish people would do some research, as I did before embarking on 'Maggie's Illustrious South Atlantic tours'... 😏
Argentina call the islands "Islas Malvinas" which is the Spanish translation from French of "Les Iles Malouines".
A Malouine is an inhabitant of the city of St. Malo in Brittany, France.
Louis-Antoine de Bougainville was invloved in conquering the islands for Louis 15th and set up a trading company with people from St Malo settling on one part of islands. The British under Captain John Strong navigated another part. The Spanish fought and gained control of some parts from the French. Even the Dutch became involved!
The true 'ownership' of these islands is complicated.
For more information you can read here in French but easily translated.
www.axl.cefan.ulaval.ca/amsudant/Falkland.htm
the true ownership in not completed at all. Britain was the first to meaningfully settled the islands it was then a crown colony until 1982 when it became a British overseas territory and achieved self government then in a free and fair democratic international monitored referendum the population chose 99.9% to remain a British overseas territory.🇬🇧🇫🇰🇬🇸
@@tonyvesResoluciones de la ONU.
logically the island are argentina terretory
Incorrect
Logically the the Island is British…From a legal and practical standpoint, the Islands are currently governed by the UK as a British Overseas Territory. The UK asserts sovereignty based on historical presence and administration of the islands since 1833. It’s British, how can it not be British?
@@SnakePliskin762Explain.
@@fatladattheback8642 read the above comment plus the fact it has an entirely British population which wants to stay British.
no estoy de acuerdo, pero, gracias
Argentina win