Відео

Who do you think had the better career, Mark Webber or Felipe Massa?

My thoughts regarding some years: 84: this year for proves why Lauda is one of GOATS of F1 as snatching that title and beating Prost in his own game is something else. 98: I think both Mika or Schumi deserves this title. Schumi had a higher highs, but he also make a noticeable blunders on Monaco with Wurz and Diniz and I laugh just how he lucked in Canada when he received stop-and-go penalty for his "driving" and still overtaken Fisi for a win. And Mika also had more relaiablity issues that denied 2 more races comparing 1 for Michael. 99: HHF winning is the only correct option but far more interesting way is that if Schumi wouldn't break his leg I think Mika and Mclaren would more competent in the end. And even without considering this accident I still think Frentzen was more consistent and made less blunders (only ones are failing to disable launch control but it also his engineer fault too and spun off in Malaysia qualifying) compering with Schumi (crashing on his own in Canada, trying to gambling on Magny-Cours with higher downforce setup and stalling his car in Australia). 00: Arguable, Schumi had a phenomenal start and the end but in mid-season he had 3 blunders on his own (Monaco retiring by pushing too hard and 1-lap shunt in Austria and Hockenheim). McLaren was also more unreliable. 07: Ham phenomenal first half was also benefitted by Kimi and Alonso struggling to adapt for to new tires and cars. Once they've done it Lewis lost this advantage and KImi second half was as monstrous. And I still can't figure out why Ham wasn't penalized in Japan as he brake checked and caused Webber and Seb crash (and ironically benefitted Kimi position). 08: Neither Ham or Massa deserve this title. They both make too many mistakes and Kubica is far more deserving this title. Nando second half once Renault started figuring their car was the best overall. 09: Button is far more deserving despite his second half. 11: Seb and RB7 was the best combo, but Button is in very close second and along with 2004 his personal best. 15: Ham deserves this title, but Seb if he had better car I think he could challenge him (I think it was his the best drive where he very close to Mercs in point until second-half). 16: Danny Ric is the winner here, sorry not sorry. 17: I think Seb had better edge, but his blunder in Singapore with pile-up sealed his fate along with mechanical issues later. 18: Deserving title by Lewis. But the real question if Nando was in Ferrari we would potentially win title as he really dragged his McLaren to places where it shouldn't be. 21: Max is the only answer. Lewis winning would be the luckiest WDC as he made a huge blunder in Baku and lucked in Silverstone when Leclerc received his engine issues (plus celebrating like crazy after that collision with Max is for me the point of no return to Max and Ham relationship) 24: Second half is the reason why Max is the best driver of if this generation. Even with his aggressive moves he still had wins in Brazil and Qatar. Additional notes: current viewers wouldn't get just how incredible Fangio and Clark were at their time. I even said prior if Clark had better reliability he would win every championship he participated and Fangio with likes like Ascari and Moss still made miracles with his car.

The lando max title fight narrative was hilarious maxs title was never in doubt

2016 is Lewis. He won more than Nico and he would’ve won if not for Malaysia. He bottled some starts but his charge at the end of the season was sensational

Hakkinen was the best in 99

Completely agreed with Alain Prost for 1982. For 1981 i would have picked Alan Jones who had a spate of late-race retirements and dominated Reutemann throughout the season. For 1973 i would have picked Fittipaldi, who suffered a temporary loss of form after his crash in Zandvoort. However, i completely agree with Lauda for 1974-75-76-77 ...

This is the ultimate showcase of subjective fanboyism prevalent in the F1 community. It is logically flawed to compare drivers in different cars, and say one is the best of them all by your subjective metrics. Drivers with weak teammates can be easily thought of as overperforming the "slower" car, when it is impossible by nature and the reality is just their teammate making the car look slow. Drivers with weak teammate is also being viewed more favourably in terms of consistency due to the low amount of effort for them to beat their weak teammates and look good. With the amount of rhetoric happening in the F1 community, there is no way that the "overperforming" god Fernando Alonso got matched and arguably beaten by the "car merchant" Lewis Hamilton as a rookie in the same car. Same with Kimi Raikkonen, the "biggest natural talent" being actually underwhelming in the face of a mere Sebastian Vettel in the same car, who himself got dominated by some random guy named Charles Leclerc. You can only compare drivers who race in the same car, otherwise you'll embarrass yourself when your favourite driver got exposed.

I think you can make a solid argument for both Alonso and Lewis for 2014, I also think the same applies for 2020 with Verstappen, I think it's quite close.

So Piquet wins the title with the third best car em 1981 and injured and against his own team in 1987 but wasn't the best driver in either...? What did you drink before writing it? Petrol? 😂

I would not say 2010 to Alonso firstly Vettel had HORRID reliability and secondly despite the turkey incident when the ball was in alonsos court in Abu Dhabi when it was time to be clutch he stayed behind petrov and even started cutting corners out of desperation and then blamed the guy lmao ( check out f1 tv Abu Dhabi 2010) 2012 fair enough but not 2010 imo, Ferrari was great in race pace that year

How close would you have put Alonso to Verstappen in 2023?

you are just hamilton hater, bye

Good video man. As a LH fan I still just say he is the most successful driver. But in his era there were more races per year. And don't get me started about points lol

This year was great but 85, 86, and 87 were the best consecutive years

How old are you?

I agree with most of the picks. 👍

Not the Lando diss only 10 seconds in 😭😭

Has to be quite an opinionated list considering the rating of everyone opponents

Original enough, but still a bit opinionated and defo will not end the debate.

This is complete bullshit...

1997 - Olivier Panis was robbed

With all that happened.. 1982 must have been a nightmare to rank...so many contenders

My list 2000-2002- MSC 2003- Kimi Raikkonen 2004- MSC 2005- Kimi Raikkonen 2006- Fernando Alonso 2007- Kimi Raikkonen 2008- Kubica, Vettel and Alonso 2009- Alonso 2010- Fernando Alonso and Vettel 2011- Vettel 2012- Alonso 2013- Vettel 2014- Lewis Hamilton 2015- Sebastian Vettel 2016- Nico Rosberg 2017- Sebastian Vettel 2018- Fernando Alonso 2019- Lewis Hamilton 2020- Max Verstappen 2021-2024- Max Verstappen

I really like stuff like this. Naturally, I think you're off on quite a few cases, but most of the comments have way worse takes. My personal list: I genuinely mean it could be either if I'm using "or". This can be for various reasons (I'll elaborate on some situations at the end). 1950 Fangio 1951 Fangio or Ascari 1952 Ascari 1953 Ascari 1954 Fangio 1955 Fangio 1956 Fangio or Moss 1957 Fangio or Moss 1958 Moss 1959 Moss 1960 Moss 1961 Moss 1962 Clark 1963 Clark 1964 Clark 1965 Clark 1966 Clark 1967 Clark 1968 Stewart 1969 Stewart or Rindt 1970 Stewart 1971 Stewart or Peterson 1972 Stewart 1973 Stewart 1974 Peterson 1975 Peterson 1976 Lauda 1977 Lauda 1978 Lauda 1979 Villeneuve 1980 Villeneuve 1981 Villeneuve 1982 Rosberg 1983 Piquet or Rosberg or Prost 1984 Rosberg or Prost or Lauda 1985 Prost or Senna 1986 Senna or Prost 1987 Senna 1988 Prost or Senna 1989 Senna or Prost 1990 Senna 1991 Senna 1992 Senna 1993 Senna 1994 Schumacher 1995 Schumacher 1996 Schumacher 1997 Schumacher 1998 Schumacher 1999 Schumacher or Frentzen 2000 Schumacher 2001 Schumacher 2002 Schumacher 2003 Schumacher or Alonso 2004 Schumacher 2005 Schumacher or Raikkonen or Alonso 2006 Alonso or Schumacher 2007 Raikkonen 2008 Alonso 2009 Alonso 2010 Alonso or Kubica or Hamilton 2011 Alonso 2012 Alonso 2013 Alonso or Vettel 2014 Alonso or Hamilton 2015 Hamilton 2016 Alonso or Hamilton 2017 Verstappen or Hamilton or Vettel 2018 Hamilton 2019 Verstappen 2020 Verstappen 2021 Verstappen 2022 Verstappen 2023 Verstappen 2024 Verstappen or Leclerc Now for some explanations: I have a much poorer grasp on the 50s to mid-60s than on the rest. 1985 and especially 1986, I have Senna ahead of Prost on pure driving but his unique ability (as per f1 metrics) to influence his own mechanical reliability, which made a huge impact in those years, gets Prost in the conversation. 1992 was a pretty poor year for Senna, but there isn't any competition. Schumacher wasn't there yet, Prost was literally not there, and Mansell is not a top driver of anywhere close to that caliber. 1999 Schumacher was the best driver but if you (understandably) don't count him for missing half of the season, Frentzen is the next best. In 2017, it's a philosophical decision between Verstappen on one side and Hamilton/Vettel on the other. Verstappen barely saw the finish line due to woefully reliability and bad luck. Every unaffected race he is great. The question for me is then: Is it realistic for Verstappen to go the whole season near perfectly if he had normal reliability and luck? And further, does it matter?

These 80s takes though 😂😂😂

Alain Prost 1989! Dont make me Laugh. You say over "the course of the season they were fairly equal", Senna won 6 wins to Prost's 4, Senna lost 2 more wins in the last 3 laps through mechanical problems, one of which was gifted to Prost, Prost won that title by picking up points, Senna dominated him on the track. Same as in 1988 Senna won more races than Prost and lost another in the last laps at Monza thanks to Schlesser taking him out at the 1st chicane. You are clearly a big Prost fan cause how you give him 1987 over Mansell is ridiculous.

Love this sort of thing, very subjective! Disagree with a few but most of them I was just nodding my head in agreement. Ones I would change: 1953 - Ascari 1961 - Moss 1982 - Pironi 1984 - Prost 1987 - Mansell 1988 - Senna 1998 - Hakkinen 2008 - Kubica 2014 - Hamilton 2016 - Rosberg 2019 and 2020 - Hamilton Love the content! Great video!

Great video! Totally agree with Kimi in 2009. Great pick. He was stunning, when you look at how much bad luck he suffered in the first half. He outqualified Massa before the accident too and was always quicker in the races usually.

11:33 Juan Manuel Fangio says Jim Clark dominance may bore fans

You're very inconsistent with your own rules. I feel like if it's a driver you rate that has a dominant season you don't question it, but if it's someone you don't rate as much you'll find someone who outperformed a weaker car.

Schumacher was on a different level, he would have had 10 titles if 1999 accident didn't happen

2000-2002 MSC 2003 Kimi 2004 MSC 2005 Alonso or Kimi (kinda a toss up) 2006 Alonso 2007 Hamilton 2008 Kubica 2009 Alonso, Button or Vettel 2010 Alonso 2011 Vettel 2012 Alonso 2013 Vettel or Alonso 2014 Alonso or Ricciardo 2015 Hamilton 2016 Verstappen 2017 Hamilton 2018 Alonso or Hamilton 2019-2024 Verstappen That’s the list of 21st century “best drivers of the season” whatever that means

Not having Robert Kubica in 2008 is a highway robbery!

Having just watched the 2009 season Doco on Disney +, I feel Jenson really did deserve the 09 best driver over Kimi, got to keep in mind Brawn was so cash strapped and Ferrari can just throw countless resource that by round 7 brawn never had the best car again and still button won. but nice idea on the video. I always enjoy your content.

Enjoyed the video. Here in the States we decide the college football champion through a poll of experts. It would be interesting if they did the same in Formula One.

Prost over Senna in 88 and 89, 90 just shows this youtuber doesnt have a clue.... Senna was much better. Maybe the youtuber is french.

Several awful takes from a hater

Nice concept but you are talking utter crap for most of this video. I think you are just trying to wind up proper F1 fans. Max deserves nothing by the way.

Kimi wasn't the best driver in 2007 and 2009. In both seasons he struggled way too much against Massa imo. I would give 2007 to Hamilton and 2009 to either Hamilton or Alonso. 2010 is also questionable. Alonso made too many errors in the first half of 2010. I personally think that Hamilton, Kubica and Rosberg were at least aa good, if not even slightly better than Alonso during the season. 2016 is also very questionable. Verstappen did a fantastic job considering the circumstances but he wasn't even the best Red Bull driver. And there are more weird choices.

Pastor will be delighted with your assessment. 😂 But what about those awful "wins" arranged by team orders? How many races has Lewis won because Valtteri had to be reined in by James? Or poor Rubens in Austria? Or, "Fernando is faster than you"? Or, the last fortysomething driver to win a race (which Nigel had no business winning)? 😉 Nice try... but in the end it's a bit of a moot point. The "W" is all that counts, a win is a win is a win, right?