Відео

You just missed part of a background to the Arcane Tower, it was in some dialogue in another place that you never have gotten due to your choices. Just a little story, nothing important

The button does a thing :-) I'm very doubtful you can figure it out :-)

I personally like this combo of mods: - Longer Battles Mod - Realistic Accuracy Mod - andys slower movement So I have more time to enjoy watching all the fighting animations between issuing orders

Important clarification from Hecleas, the mod author: not all these changes will work in custom battles, so please keep that in mind.

While we're on the topic of walled city sieges, why is it possible for a single lord to besiege an entire city (and a full army), and prevent them from participating in a nearby field battle?

Good work, but wonder if this overrides for eg SFO changes?

from the mod description i thought they were saying that the mod only applied to campaign and not custom battles? because they seem to be applying a percentage change to all units once the campaign has loaded and not editing the stats for each unit in their files?

I need to stop trying different mods and actually play a campaign 😆

Comment for the comment god!

subscribed :)

~10:40 "Nah, we're not gonna get him" Malakai just casually landing the killing blow as Michael hits end turn - "What's that you said, lad?"

Nuclear-hot take: sieges in Total War were always afwul. And I like sieges in WH3 because I can just choose to not interact with siege mechanics at all. You know what TW had good sieges? Shogun 2. Cause it’s a tiny fort and when you’re defending it creates a great “last stand” feeling. And when you’re attacking it really feels like you need to overcome desperate resistance. Or bomb them, it’s also fun. 18:20 also want to comment on this. Walls are not just useless in vanilla, they’re actually harmful. As a defender you’re discouraged from defending them and as an attacker sending your troops to climb the walls is actually the worst thing you can do. Most of the time they will take an unreasonable amount of damage even if it’s chosen or ironbreakers vs chaff. Just knock down the gates, make a hole in the wall and rush inside, don’t bother with walls.

Is there any adjustment to recruiting or construction times to match movement and xp reduction?

WE, cathay, umpire, kislev as anyone but boris but mostly stanky on RoC, and dwarves so you can say you beat the game on legendary

Sieges are not sieges. The entire point is that a frontal assault is crazy, but in warhammer frontal assaults are THE MOVE. It's just an urban warfare setting, not a siege.

ua-cam.com/video/df1Cd7fKYJM/v-deo.htmlsi=1a7U6fOf0HDs3CKN

Like and good video.👍👍

Like and good video.👍👍 Curios but ironic that the wood elves proved to be a better ally to Karl. (in the lore Orion saved baby Karl and his dad from beastmen saying that Karl would help all) Also thanks to Reiklands command (you my dude) Elsphet is fighting.

I understand where your coming from in regards to this video, but the fact we HAVE to mod the game for it to play better is annoying. A good chunk of battles are walled settlement battles, but god forbid CA takes the time to make them more enjoyable.

How sure are you that killing an enemy lord in battle yields better exp and rewards in a situation where the army is wiped out anyway due to running away at first? Thanks for the video!

Wood elves in Athel Loren. Did very hard campaign and chilled in the forest for 100 turns as world fell apart upgrading kings glade then sallied out with army of waystalkers and conquered around

Slows down wall climbing… the Ass-ladders are the real reason walled sieges are broken. Without them, you’d break through at the gates, where all the archers and gunners are waiting. The ones not shooting from the ground, over the wall. Also murderholes on the walls, and gate building should be standard, not just something Highelves have. And more that 1 archer/mage in each wall-tower, making the towers useful, making the presence on the wall useful. Just a few ideas of mine Also Inwould like to be able to replace the basic units in the garrison with units that the particular settlement can produce, in return for paying upkeep for replaced units.

That's the elephant in the room when it comes to sieges, when you have some many powerfull artillery and strong magic spells walls are basically useless in the tabletop wall have some sort of magical protection or some bullshit that makes them useful, maybe if the walls had moats and forced the enemy to funnel troops into choke points to climb walls maybe positioning troops outside the walls would make sense. Three Kingdoms total war sieges are much better because it's traditional warfare.

In first yay!

also the towers need to be stronger and dish out more damage and the tower placement is shocking bad. you ca get huge sieges where the AI lines up outside and there is only 1 tower or sometimes none guarding an approach.

yep, the AI attacked "undefended" minor settlements is the reason why they should bring back wall to minor settlements. Makes it much harder for the AI and frankly this all came about when players complained to CA about the constant siege battles where there are no walls but a city with loads of choke points and so they made it a open field battle for the early stages of a minor settlement but for some reason threw their toys out the pram and removed walls for lvl 3 minor settlements. just childish imo.

Great content!

they should have a toggle in the options of WH3 so we can use the siege system in WH2. You get much bigger and greater battles in the WH2 system. Bring back walls for minor settlements as well, that should also be a toggle option.

Legend of total war is fine and ive been subbed for years to him but hes more for ADHD people. he never does full runs, he's always cheese cake'n it and just bounces around video to video. that said hes still fun to watch sometimes. imo ruinous insight is the best total war player to watch and has high tactical/strategy intellect.

Hope you do a video on how to keep the grudge targets down for age of reckoning. I was playing a Belegar campaign and my age of reckoning target was 3500 which is fine, but then the next age the target was 32000 and that's not a typo. Thirty-two thousand.

Only 48 seconds in, I'll watch the video in full when I can, but I can say that I know for fact that Legend appreciates people making videos like this, he's very pro creator and community. Good guy Legend.

Nah Legend won't mind. He loves actual discourse, agree or disagree.

Sisters of Twilight is another honorable mention - very strong LL (probably the strongest at level 1), and Hawk Rider volleys just delete infantry. And being WE they don't need to expand much leaving you free to do anything you want.

Cathay is actually pretty good. I like creating buffer states to fight my enemies, just like real life. 👍

Don't worry fam, TheLegend is a cool guy no problem, maybe he'll react to your tactics

Why not run away? Take every gobbo you can and just head south (I think the tomb kings like you), take over Thoreks mountains and let someone else deal with Wissenland.

Great job....I love it when a plan comes together

Looking forward to watching this after work

Vilitch the Curseling should be mentioned. Safest start position in the entire game and Cathay is way too preoccupied with skaven and dark elves to do anything to you, while Zhatan fields utter garbage armies for the first 20 turns.

The endless ladders and the horrible settlement layouts make defending a city so damn painful. And why the heck can't we deploy outside the walls to hold back enemies so that our towers can actually do some damage? The capture points I don't mind, I like that there are areas that have to be captured / defended... but why does the final point, which should be like the citadel of your settlement, have THREE OR MORE GODDAMN approaches?!

Did you gave a chance to Total War Pharoah Dynasties? I think you would love it with your approach to total war games. And sieges there a lot of fun. Without free ladders the walls are significant hurdle to overcome. The game has no artillery so you can't fire for 10 minutes before engaging. And general ballance because it's historical just provides better experience for which total war engines were designed for, without single entities and extremly elite units.

Yes yes!

Very nicely done guys.

Just returned to warhammer 3, great video mate

Great plan and a great fight with Bernard :-) I never thought about doing it that way. In my first playthrough it was a nasty fight with a lot of consumables, I triggered him just like you did and my party was out of everything pretty much at that point, almost all characters died, Lae'zel saved the day 😂 Never had any problems with him in any other playthrough.

I'm not sure, but I think Bernard is too big to shove for you specifically as a halfling - small creature. Arrow of Thunder doesn't require you to hit a target to trigger it's effect, you can shoot it anywhere near it even just look at the indicator of the push direction and hope for a bad roll on their part :-)

Beautifull thunderwave!!! A possibility was throw something from up. The bludgeoning damage from falling would be massive

Uncanny Dodge is just weird 😂 There are mods that fix it, that should tell you something about it :-)

I'm so glad you made a reaction video on this. I recall thinking, when first watching Legend's video, that this is exactly the sort of problem your content and mod list seek to remedy. Sieges can be and are enjoyable with the right mods. Partially related - I couldn't recall if you used to use the no real time building mod before it was deleted but it has since been resurrected under this name: No Real Time Building Reborn (Disabled after deployment in Siege & Settlement Battles)

Noctulus is far easier imo steamroll control of Ulthuan in quick time, takes longer to decided where u want to invade next lol