Lord Mountbatten | Broadcast on Partition - 04 June 1947 (With Subtitles)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 сер 2024
  • The Indian Independence Act, 1947 was formulated by the government of Prime Minister Clement Attlee and the Governor General of India Lord Mountbatten, after representatives of the Indian National Congress, the Muslim League, and the Sikh community came to an agreement with the Viceroy of India, Lord Mountbatten of Burma, on what has come to be known as the 3 June Plan or Mountbatten Plan. This plan was the last plan for independence.
    Soon after there was a broadcast by the then Viceroy Of India, Lord Mountbatten about events leading to this decision.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @masoomanaqvi240
    @masoomanaqvi240 3 дні тому

    Mashallah Alahmdolilah

  • @manimangat
    @manimangat 4 роки тому +13

    Till now we were taught british divided india, which is very clearly false. Govt. Taught us lies.

    • @gurpreetanand1339
      @gurpreetanand1339 4 роки тому +3

      Exactly

    • @yj9032
      @yj9032 2 роки тому +2

      British partitioned India for political gains.

  • @enlighted6187
    @enlighted6187 5 років тому +9

    Mountbatten was a very clever player

    • @souravmukherjee704
      @souravmukherjee704 4 роки тому +4

      Rakhi Upadhyay There was no power struggle... Gandhi offered prime minister post to Jinnah to avoid partition but Jinnah refused it he said we want our seperate homeland & stick to that claim...There was no alternative left but to accept partition....& cabinet mission plan was flawed because it gave to much autonomy to the state & it proposed a weak central govt..it divided provinces into 3 groups based on grouping clause along religious line...if it was implemented India would have broken into 100 parts...& there would have been a weak fragmented india...so, A Pakistan is far better than fragmentation of whole India...

  • @souravmukherjee704
    @souravmukherjee704 4 роки тому +11

    Gandhi offered prime minister post to Jinnah to avoid partition but Jinnah refused it by saying we want seperate homeland of ours & stick to that claim...so, there was no alternative left but to accept partition....& cabinet mission plan of 1946 was also flawed...it gives too much power to the state...it gives autonomy to the state...& this plan proposed a weak central govt...which means a loosely federated state.....& it divided provinces into 3 groups based on grouping clause along religious line....if this plan was implemented India would have been broken into 100 small parts....thats why Congress fist supported the plan but when they know the true motive behind the plan they withdrew from it...So, a small Pakistan is far better than a weak fragmented india.....

    • @chanchalthakur8907
      @chanchalthakur8907 4 роки тому +3

      Get your fact checked once more.
      It was because of nehru who was never in favour of k nnah being the pm.
      Further he also insulted him..

    • @manimangat
      @manimangat 4 роки тому

      They were good they got there home land & sikhs what the got with 97% secrifices!!!
      Everyday police pickup young boys under uapa & beat them mercilessly. No news chanel show 1 single report. Ex app mp & one mla khaira (app) is running here and there for their safety.

    • @kanekisenpai6553
      @kanekisenpai6553 3 роки тому

      @@manimangat same what India is doing with the kashmiris but no one cares about that

  • @maniSingh-jx4mz
    @maniSingh-jx4mz 4 роки тому +4

    Simple logic Husband -Wife fight occassionally. Should we seperate them????

  • @abubakr3481
    @abubakr3481 6 років тому +3

    I feel pain....I donno why.....

  • @hamidhossain9358
    @hamidhossain9358 13 днів тому

    Need to do real research
    Who was looking for banglas real right
    Long time after
    Mujib came in 😂picture
    And that time he was shohrowardys bodyguard
    Did you know that
    Again do some research from oxford’s history collect connections

  • @peetasingh7375
    @peetasingh7375 8 років тому +7

    The British should have given the Sikhs a homeland too.

    • @enlighted6187
      @enlighted6187 5 років тому +2

      Partition was idiotic, on part of all of the leaders, a decision for power rather than for people.

    • @robinhoodsherwood2646
      @robinhoodsherwood2646 5 років тому +2

      Peeta Singh Free Balochistan

    • @maniSingh-jx4mz
      @maniSingh-jx4mz 4 роки тому

      We don't want theological State. We have seen the state of poor people and Jagirdari in Pakistan Punjab.

  • @Historelic
    @Historelic 4 роки тому +6

    Muhammad Ali Jinnah was right and Mountbatten was wrong , today in India Hindutva fascism is making lives of the minorities a hell .

    • @dollartreeshark6786
      @dollartreeshark6786 3 роки тому +5

      @Technical Yuvaan Soni Mental hi nahin, Jinnah kaminah tha. If he thought Hindus and Muslims are two nations why did Muslims invade India? Why did Muslims live in India for centuries? Why did Junagadh which was Hindu majority acceded into Pakistan and was accepted. Why was Jinnah asking Hindu majority state of Hyderbad to be in Muslim rule. How dishonest was he?

    • @bibekdas7449
      @bibekdas7449 Рік тому +1

      ​@@dollartreeshark6786Hyderabad is Muslim majority place!

    • @dollartreeshark6786
      @dollartreeshark6786 Рік тому +1

      @@bibekdas7449 Hyderabad city is, not Hyderabad state. Hyderabad state was most of today’s telengana, some parts of adjoining Karnataka, some parts of adjoining andhrapradesh. Muslims were foreign invaders with many just imported from Iran, Arabia and Turkey for administrative purposes.

  • @bisalshaw2780
    @bisalshaw2780 3 роки тому +1

    They divide india. So, they can weak akhand bharat. They want and belive in divide & Rule policy.

  • @chamanali733
    @chamanali733 3 роки тому +3

    Mountbatten was dishonest man

    • @user-ek2hs1ph2g
      @user-ek2hs1ph2g 3 роки тому +3

      Who are you🤯

    • @bibekdas7449
      @bibekdas7449 Рік тому +1

      He was second most honourable British Government (in Indian subcontinent) after Derozeo!

    • @anuran.chowdhury
      @anuran.chowdhury 6 місяців тому

      So were our own leaders who were thirsty for quick usurpation of political power.