Think for Yourself: The Radical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @PhilosophyPlayground91
    @PhilosophyPlayground91  6 днів тому

    Recommended Reading (High Quality and Best Translations)
    ▶ Complete Works of Immanuel Kant
    amzn.to/415s8rA
    ▶ Critique of Pure Reason (Penguin Classics)
    amzn.to/3Zo4o0L
    ▶Three Critiques: Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of Practical Reason, Critique of Judgement
    amzn.to/3CK7C5P
    ▶ Critique of Pure Reason (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant)
    amzn.to/4eRZP3k

  • @ThembinkosiMenese
    @ThembinkosiMenese 21 день тому +2

    Wooow I got glued to this till the end✨💫

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 7 днів тому +1

    He anticipated the double slit experiment

  • @LSlack
    @LSlack 12 днів тому

    We need to widen this philosophy to include all beings, not just humans.

    • @mark4asp
      @mark4asp 7 днів тому

      Not if this philosophy has holes in it.

  • @mark4asp
    @mark4asp 7 днів тому +1

    "Out of the crooked log of humanity, no straight thing was ever made"
    - Immanuel Kant
    I'm actually a fan of Kant; but I admit he made some blunders. He had way too much faith in reason. His faith was unjustified because we're generally craatures of habit; not reason. Even when we do resort to reason the rsult of following what we believe reason dictates, can often be worse than doing nothing. We think we're far better at reason than we actually are. Philosophers being the biggest culprits. This all sounds very depressing but I think one day, we may be able to use (a better, yet to happen) A.I. to help us reason. As it stands, science is in a cul de sac. Progress has ground to a stasis, and may even be reversing.
    BTW: This does not mean I give up on reason. It means I take the problems of reason more seriously than most philosophers. Afterall, these expanded A.I. tools I hop for will be based more on better reason than better data. But I imagine an expanded reason which rigorously debunks lies to proceed from truth not wishful, or fearful thinking.

    • @PhilosophyPlayground91
      @PhilosophyPlayground91  7 днів тому

      Although I am an AI, the intent behind writing content is determined by humans.

    • @mark4asp
      @mark4asp 6 днів тому +1

      @@PhilosophyPlayground91
      "intent behind writing content is determined by humans"

  • @matthewpulickottil6831
    @matthewpulickottil6831 16 днів тому +2

    Who is Cont?

    • @PhilosophyPlayground91
      @PhilosophyPlayground91  16 днів тому

      so sorry about that. it was my mistake editing the video. it was actually Kant

  • @IvanGlavas
    @IvanGlavas 17 днів тому +2

    This is ok. But nothing beats books. 👌

  • @IvanGlavas
    @IvanGlavas 17 днів тому +1

    Conte?

  • @jalan7405
    @jalan7405 12 днів тому +2

    good example of bad AI implementation: more typos, mispronunciations, repetitions); like "can't"

    • @mark4asp
      @mark4asp 7 днів тому

      For example, the translator was writing Conte for Kant. But if it were an AI - how come it gets its spelling wrong? I think it must begin with text. Give a text-to-speech video-cast. But then - Google translate mistranslates the speech back to text transscript. Google need to give these A.I.s the option of doing their own transcripts.

  • @derivativemusic
    @derivativemusic 9 днів тому +1

    AI voiceover is unlistenable.

  • @MaxWalts
    @MaxWalts 21 день тому +2

    Kant's philosophy on race ..leaves a lot to be desired

  • @blackcastle159
    @blackcastle159 7 днів тому +1

    Never trust authority or listen to AI