*Originally written as singular notes, to be played one after another, with no two overlapping. Somehow this is what Bach intended. He just didn't know it. How pleased he would be to see this.* 1:47
Well, if you know Bach's music, he later reused the original solo violin work and expanded it to a sinfonia when he had a bigger orchestra available... If we take that as precedent, he would have expanded the work even further if symphonic orchestras had existed in his time.
Es que la adaptación es nefasta, este preludio en particular suena mejor en clavecin, incluso en piano. Bach es obviamente espléndido, el problema es la adapta del preludio inicial. La segunda pieza suena mejor ya que es una adaptación del propio Bach.
Bach himself rework that movement as a sinfonia to be played by many more instruments including 3 trombas (trombone or trumpet?), 2 oboes, timpani, organ and strings.
El tal Henry Woods se atrevio a orquestar el preludio de la partita para violin y le salió horrorosa, que necesidad había si el propio Bach en persona ya había realizado una muy buena adaptación del preludio en una sinfonía para cantata.
Authenticists go home!!!!Fabulous!!!!
This is what Bach intended. We just didn't know it.
*Originally written as singular notes, to be played one after another, with no two overlapping. Somehow this is what Bach intended. He just didn't know it. How pleased he would be to see this.* 1:47
Well, if you know Bach's music, he later reused the original solo violin work and expanded it to a sinfonia when he had a bigger orchestra available... If we take that as precedent, he would have expanded the work even further if symphonic orchestras had existed in his time.
@@davidriggenbach6672 - This is why Bach is the greatest of them all.
The second piece is better known as "Sinfonia to Cantata No. 29"
Genial,Bach se banca todo,flacooooooo!!!!!!!!!!
A nadie le gusta por lo visto. A mi me parece fabuloso.
No one seems to like this arrangement. I think it's fantastic.
Es que la adaptación es nefasta, este preludio en particular suena mejor en clavecin, incluso en piano.
Bach es obviamente espléndido, el problema es la adapta del preludio inicial.
La segunda pieza suena mejor ya que es una adaptación del propio Bach.
solo violin prelude played by 100 piece orchestra I dont think so
Bach himself rework that movement as a sinfonia to be played by many more instruments including 3 trombas (trombone or trumpet?), 2 oboes, timpani, organ and strings.
ua-cam.com/video/sqdXwd7FEyI/v-deo.html
Regarding the original ua-cam.com/video/1Csynke0maE/v-deo.html, yes it lacks something. But just still very good.
El tal Henry Woods se atrevio a orquestar el preludio de la partita para violin y le salió horrorosa, que necesidad había si el propio Bach en persona ya había realizado una muy buena adaptación del preludio en una sinfonía para cantata.
Te sugiero poner primero reproducir al video, escuchar y luego sacar tus propias conclusiones.
No me imagino qué quiso hacer el orquestador.Tal vez fue una broma musical (bastante aburrida).
Mmm...parece más Beethoven que Bach.
Still like Bach's simplicity better. Sorry Mr. Wood...
Gonanza Bons
Nah, this is how Bach would probably sound like if he had more instruments at that time.
He would make use of them in a more "BWV 29" style sinfonia I think.