I’m a big fan of the VCore line using the current v6 version. I recently demoed the 2023 VCore 100 for about a week. It came with a poly in the mains and a syn gut in the crosses. My guess is that it was strung at around 52 lbs. Initially, I also had some problems with the balls flying long on me. This racquet has more power than the previous version. However, I got accustomed to the great feel and pocketing of the racquet and learned that it could take a fast swing if I could manage to impart more spin. I’m very much a senior player, playing against guys 10-15 years younger. I’m also pretty much a doubles player due to some knee injuries. Despite that, this racquet gives me access to power and depth that can stymie returns or set up a put away volley. Some guys in my age spectrum use a much lighter racquet that seems to work well enough for their games. However, I prefer more heft and plow through which this racquet delivers. Serve power was also improved over version 6. Yes, at $270 this racquet is a hefty investment. Still mulling over whether the enhanced features merits an expensive upgrade. As always, I enjoy and appreciate Tennis Nerd reviews!
I think they feel bigger because the buttcap has less flare and you hold it lower? Because it's actually not but I've felt that way before as well But these other brands have also changed sizes.
This is actually due to the wrapped part of grip being thinner. So stock, the overall size is the same as other brands. But if you replace the grip, it's then thicker. Likewise, putting the stock Yonex grip on a Head racquet will make the overall grip size smaller. Even leather grips are thicker than stock Yonex.
Agree i think this is the reason, yonex stock grip material is thinner. When i replace my main grip i have to use wilson featherthin@@josephduchene5849
Great review as always. Spot on too. I am an intermediate player 52 age, Even i had the 100 and even i had to switch to the 98 to get control. 98 is one of the best in the market. gives me the best overall game...good power, nice depth, great at slice and one arm backhand.
Recently purchased the Vcore 95s after demoing for a week. I had demoed both the 95 and 98 but loved the 95 so much I barely even hit with the 98. I just knew the 95 was the one. Coming from a 97 inch frame I really didn’t notice much of a difference going to this 95. It’s got great feel and comfort, good control at least for me, and very good spin potential.
I haven't strung them yet. Waiting till about April when warmer weather gets closer. Always loving technifibre X-1 Biphase 17ga at about 52 lbs. Will experiment with lead and a leather grip
If you're a decent player and searching for a new racket try these three, they are all GREAT! Yonex EZONE 98, Yonex Vcore 98 and Wilson Blade 100. (latest versions of all). I was surprised the Blade has as much power as it does!
I had the pleasure to try the Vcore100, Pure Aero, Head Extreme MP, and Dunlop SX300 side by side last week (thanks to Tennis Plaza Miami). For me the fight is between the Aero and the Extreme. The Vcore100 felt way too muted for my taste
What do you think about rockets in terms of sweet spot size? Where it is more forgiving? I've tried aero 2019 and would have more or less same size sweet spot and 25% less power and a little bit less stiffness. A little bit more plush. What could you advise in my situation? Thanks in advance
I wouldn't do that, IMO RPM rough doesn't have that good of spin or control, so it would be too launchy in the 98. I would stick to a shaped and lower powered poly like maybe hyper G or volkl cyclone around the same tension
Nice review, I'm surprised you did not use the same string as a baseline to make a more accurate comparison between the frames but you gave your reasons. I moved to the Ezone 98 2022 from the 2021 Vcore but doubt I would move back as I get enough spin, power and control.
@@MrFunkyko personally, I had to add some weight to the ezone 100 to get that super nice plush feeling (10 grams) but BOI ever since I did that it has been a dream to play with! I feel like the added stability really does a lot for comfort. (Strings I use are Luxilon element.)
Love the content TN and very jealous of your weather! But completely agree about the lack of feedback and feel nowadays from most brands. I switched from the 2017 PureAero to the 2018 Vcore 98 and loved it, still using it today as my main stick. It is a more powerful racket than the PureAeros IMO but have upped my tension a tad over the years to limit shots going long. Volkl Cyclone is my go to string with the Vcore. Have to say i hated the 2021 vcore update, yonex completely numbed the feel in that and so debating whether this 2023 version is worth a shout still? I guess its still very similar in that department? If you had to choose TN would you go new 95, the 2018 95 or old SV95?
@@cadethompson3617 Elaborate further please? I am going to be doing a racquet review on the VCorePro 97D 18x20 whenever I can get my hands on one that doesnt = losing a solid part of one's weekly wage!
I have the 2021 VCorePro97H, which has phenomenal plow through, but is quite heavy. Watch out for over-spec rackets (heavier than the target weight), which can put strain on your arm (from shoulder to elbow to wrist), if your strokes aren’t perfect (most of us). Of course, 16x19 will offer a bit more spin, and 18x20 more control. Ideally, try lots of rackets with different strokes (flat and spinny groundies, serves, volleys, …) to see which racket suits you best. The specs are only somewhat useful. Then, ask your stringer for recommendations, based on your play style and any issues.
Thanks for the review. Hit with the outgoing 98 since it came out. Can't wait to try the new one. Also trying the prince ats 98 this week... Wondering which one will be the keeper. Whats your say comparing those two?
Question for you and the community. Does the vcore 98 has more power than a vcore pro 100? What has a bigger impact on the control vs power scale, headsize or the flex of the raquet?
I just tried the 98 and 100 today. The 100 is more powerful, but the ball shoots off the string bed fast. As a result, I don't have much time to put more spin to the ball, which translates to lower control for the 100. The 98 has a longer dwell time and very good feel at impact. I have the chance to do more to the ball because of the longer dwell time and can hit a heavy ball. So I'd say 100 is for beginner who don't have developed techniques yet. And 98 is definitely more controlled and hits a heavy ball for people who have the right swinging motion. Also, 98 isn't that hard to use compared to some other typical control oriented 98 that are targeted at really good players. In summary, 100 is easy to use, targeted at casual players who don't have fully developed techniques. 98 will be stronger than 100 in the hands of people who have the right swinging motion, and is much easier to use compared to some of the other control oriented 98, such as radical mp, tf40, blade v7.
@@fluffy_skye the 100, various gens of it, is more commonly found on the pro tour seemingly than the 98 vcore. Granted, that's balanced that way thanks to the wta tour, but the wta tour are better than the majority of tennis players in the world. Let's also note that the top spin specialists on the male pro tour use equivalents to the 100. The leading average forehand RPM players largely use such frames. And there's a reason for it. The launch angle is higher. Access to spin is easier. A pro player can't let ego decide their equipment. They will use what works. And it's no coincidence that players quite often dial into their strengths with their setup, and customisation plays a huge role in this as well. It's actually all not so simple. At a basic level, the 98 is actually a less effective racket. It is inferior compared to the 100 in winning the battle of ball Vs racket. The 98 would require a heavier spec in order to match it, and any advantage in swing speed with a thinner smaller head would be cancelled out by that heavier spec. The 98 has its own advantages though. Namely, slightly more control over targeting. It also has a lower launch angle. A lower launch angle can put more time pressure on an opponent, as it takes less time to reach your opponent. For beginner/intermediate/lower advanced players, in stock, who don't have good control over their swings yet, the less effective stringbed (doesn't win the battle of ball Vs racket as well as 100 in stock) can be like an assistant. It helps you to control the ball. It's like how a pure drive helps a beginner hit with more consistent depth. A 98 can potentially help you keep more balls in. You have to bring more of your own control with the 100. One of the best ways to do that is to use a lot of spin. However, most rec players would play better with the 100, even if they don't think so. Most rec players don't hit overly hard. They don't have much control. They're not very fit. The fundamentals just aren't there in most cases. The 100 has a more effective hitting area. This means you don't have to be as accurate. You have more effective mass at different points on the stringbed, and in reality this translates into less variation in depth and pace under pressure. So play anyone any good and the 98 in the hands of the majority of rec players is going to feed the opponent some easier balls. But given enough time on the ball, the less effective stringbed of the 98 can help keep more balls in by helping the player with control (more precise stringbed and in stock more lost energy at contact, meaning a weaker ball less likely to sail). A high level player using the 98 may opt for a heavier spec to increase the effectiveness of its hitting area relative to the players needs including contact point. Some may even use it fairly light but swing speed makes up for it. Alcaraz would be a great example, who uses a near stock spec Babolat pure aero Vs, a direct competitor to the vcore 98. But make no mistake, both the ATP and wta have plenty of 100 users. So this idea of them just being for beginners is entirely false.
Op. Yes and no. The first bit I'll go with is power Vs control scale. The better a racket wins the battle of racket Vs the ball the more control and power you can find with the racket. It doesn't necessarily mean you'll actually get more control and power by increasing its effectiveness in this area. Even at the top level. Simply, the more effective mass where you make contact with the ball the more power and, technically, control, with other factors playing a role. You can have two rackets, one that's 300g and another that's 315, but the 300 one could have more effective mass. To increase the effective mass, you can do things like increase its swing and twist weight. Of course, other variables also contribute, like string spacing/pattern and all the other things. For example, a pure drive has very effective hitting weight values, as it literally hits like a heavy racket. But it doesn't have great directional control. Design choices, and quality control, also dictate the effective hitting mass at different points of the stringbed out of the box. On that note, according to data you can find on the tennis warehouse university site, the vcore pro 100 (keep in mind quality control, even with Yonex, as you could put two of one model against each other and have one winner) is the more powerful of the two. It better wins the battle of ball Vs racket across stringbed. I have not actually personally tested the vcore pro 100, but I'll assume it's stringbed does not provide the same ease of access to spin as the vcore 98. The vcore 98 may have a higher launch angle potentially. The vcore 98 should swing faster as well, so depending on the swing style this could quite easily play a role in the outcome. My technique is quite whippy and modern, and I suspect in stock form I'd find my range and more effective hitting with the vcore 98 over the vcore pro 100. But flatter hitters may find more success with the vcore pro 100 for example. But it isn't necessarily as black and white as this. Everything comes together really to form the outcome. So head size, string pattern (and string spacing at key areas for you), beam shape/thickness, layup, RA, racket length, strings, tensions, it's spec, and so on all affect its performance. And what performs best in what areas will also depend on the individual player. So just because a racket is slower on paper for example it doesn't always mean a given player will hit a less effective shot with it. There are numerous variables. It's about pairing the player with the setup. In a basic sense, there will be traits you'll gravitate towards over time though. This can even change over time. But my point is through trial and error you can find things you like in a racket and that can begin to narrow the range you like. And all the UA-cam reviews in the world aren't going to tell you what you like, as in you personally like or find with a racket. You'll have to find out for yourself.
I’m demoing the 2021 vcore 95 and I like it. You think the new one is better? Is the power much different? I tried the Iga and did not like it because of the power. That’s why inlike the Vcore 95 but hace used it only 3 or 4 times. Which one would you recommend, the new vcore or the 2021 vcore? I drive the ball with topspin. I have a one handed backhand. I know you said this is your favorite vcore 95 yet in the video.
For Vcore 2021 (98) users: Yes, the 2023 is more powerful. With the same settings I used with the 2021, the first couple of days I just couldn't keep the ball in the court with the 2023. BUT!!! I added two pounds and I just love this new version. I felt I didn't lose control and gain more depth, more bite on my serve and maybe it's me but also better results when blocking returns.
@@TimelyAdventure ah okay makes sense. I was thinking purely in terms of racket weight and wondering how one would add 2 pounds to a racket lol. If just assumed he meant 2g 😂
Thank you for your good contribution. Question about the Yonex Vcore 98: I play the previous model. and as a tennis teacher, I really appreciate that he is grip-heavy. I notice the top-heavy racket in my arm after several hours. Is this new model just as grip-heavy? Thanks and regards Marcus
You and many often talk about racquets/strings these days being stiffer and causing a lot of arm issue for people. But then anytime you and I test racquets that come with dampening that make a racquet comfortable and arm friendly, we complain about losing the feel of the ball. So how should a racquet be made? what racquets would you go for to have an arm friendly racquet? Since switching to nat gut I havent had arm issues but just curious what you think about vibration dampening racquets
With all the dampening in the handle you mention would you ever consider adding a dampener on to the stings? I have a much older vcore and use a string dampener.
In your opinion, if you had to choose one YONEX racquet to go to battle with for DOUBLES only, which would you choose? Would that change if you were 65 years old? I would be grateful for your thoughts.
I would like to feel the racket very fast in the air, accelerate with a lot of wrist, kyrgios style, bublik (keeping proportions) and play with a lot of Topspin. If I want my racket to feel more agile and faster, is it a good idea to add weight to the 12 o'clock? Is it convenient for it to be a small space in the rim of the racket? If I put weight on the entire hoop, will the racket feel very heavy? I need help, I would appreciate it. I would like to feel the yonex vcore 98 as similar as possible to the previous version or better yet to the 2018 one
Great review! Please tell us, if you can check, vcore 100 has more open string spacing than older 2021 version? The 98 2023 has closer than 98 2021, we can see on another review on youtube. Thanks!
Always very insightful and helpful review. Thank you. I haven't demoed this racket yet but I am definitely going to. Currently using the pure aero for probably at least 6 years now (green version and I don't know what year they came out and also sure that they're not the 1st iteration). Just interesting knowing that this is a spin racket but used by Rybakina who I think could be considered as flat hitter? Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.
I've only gotten to try the new 98 and I did a review on it. We have some similar but also differing observations. Excited to try the 95 as well and should be soon! Hoping to love it.
You might recall I have an Estusa Power Beam braided (my favourite raacquet). I have been advised to try Yonex as I need another racquet ( I have two Head Flexpoint Prestige but don't use them much). I want to give the 95 a try. The Estusa is listed as 92 sq inch but in reality it is more 95 in size, good size sweet spot due to unusual head shape. I think Yonex will be similar.
You get spin from the string not the racket. All the modern strings are polyester. Hexagonal, square etc. Go for a 17 gauge string. 1.18 or 1.23 and you will get a lot of spin. Racket manufacturers want you to think that you get spin from the frame but that is hog wash. But you will need a dampened frame to handle the stiffness of the polyester string. 😊
Hi Tennisnerd, another great review, thanks! By the way, I'll ask a question because I'm getting close to buying a new racket and I don't really know which one to buy. I am looking for a tennis racket that will suit my game. I play pretty hard topspin forehand and flat two-handed backhand. I have a good flat serve and kick. Will any of these tennis racquets suit my style? If not, do you have any suggestions? Thank you in advance and best regards!
Currently playing with 95 2021. Was excited to try this new vcore 95 but something just did not click for me. I'll probably demo it a few more times but I don't know :(... I could not hit a single OHB to save my life during practice.
How would you (or anyone in the community) compare the power level to the Pure Aero 98? Part of the reason I chose the 6th gen VCore over the Aero was because I felt I couldn't fully control my forehand on the Aero.
You can look at data on tennis warehouse university site. I'm not sure of their process exactly, but I assume they select one racket from each model to get the data, so we have to keep in mind that quality control is always going to be a factor (as in you could compare two of exact same model and get different results). This even goes for Yonex, whose quality control, while great compared to other brands, is hardly on point across the different specs (they're usually really good with static weight I've found, staying within the +/-5ish grams of their target, but even that makes a difference). However, long and not so black and white story short, the pure aero Vs (haven't seen data for the new Aero 98 yet) should have higher effective mass on average across it's stringbed (hitting weight, which is not static weight). This means, on paper, more power. Contrary to popular belief, Babolat rackets commonly have more effective hitting areas (forgiveness, meaning size of decent hitting area). And this is also the case here with the pure aero vs. this means, on average, the further away from the center of the stringbed you go, which is particularly important for modern topspin hitters who make contact further up on the stringbed, the pure aero Vs becomes notably superior in this regard (with very little difference in the center of the stringbed). The model the 2023 version replaces, or at least one of the prior ones (but think it means the 2021 version), has a superior stringbed as well to the 2023 version. The lower RA of the new one will be contributing to that (although the 2023 vcore 95 has a superior stringbed to the original SV version I noticed, despite lower RA, highlighting how it's the sum total of design choices that matter). However, note that it isn't always this black and white, even more so the better you get. The lower your level of fundamentals the more black and white it will be (so a pure drive will give a beginner easier power and depth than a Blade, but this isn't 100% of the time so straightforward at higher levels). Point is. Try different rackets where possible if it's of interest. It's really the only way to really know for you personally. But yea, on paper, if we take away the player and we just look at the racket itself, the pure aero Vs at least has more power. I assume the pure aero 98 will do as well.
I've never played with a V-core, only briefly with the Ezone. How is it different from say the head speed mp, babolat pure drive VS etc? I didn't like the aero as the ball flys off the racket too much. I love the babolat pure drive from 2009 and 2012 but not the later ones
Thanks for the review! Just broke my Clash 100 yesterday and going to order the VCore 98 (will use your link to TW). What string & tension do you recommend for VCore 98? I'm a female, 3.5-4.0 player. Previously use Head velocity 17 (with 52, 53'ish) on my Clash 100. Play average 4-5 times a week.
Jonas I just tried the Yonex 100 in a 300 static weight(I know) and while pocketing, stability, power spin were fine I also tried a Technifibre T-fight 315 static that I thought was a 100 hoop but in fact a 98 hoop. Technifibre rumors were all true I simply hit a heavier ball enormous plough through man that was very noticeable, excellent racquet but off center power hitting punished more than the Ezone. So this week no Ezones available I'm trying a VCore 98. 100 size definitely fun I hear you but as you're totally familiar less accuracy. So I alsi demoed a Wilson Shift 300 light. It was fun at first but again off center wasn't as plush as Ezone but plenty of feel. The balance on Technifibre was best I ever tried off the shelf. I have a Babolat Pure Aero this weekend but made in China so not building my hopes up. I've heard from other UA-camrs launch angle took you long, that's partly why I'm trying my consistency with VCore 98. Thank you for your trademark candid review much appreciated! Can you do a string review please Jonas... www.grapplesnakeusa.com/collections/sets/products/alpha-set
can't wait for the 2023 ezone! fundamentally, i am expecting more or less the same tech being used here in the VCore to be moved over to the ezone line.
Higher luanch angle, is good or bad for the slice ? I am playing with VcorePro100 since 3 years, but maybe i need something a bite more powerfull. But i don’t Want loose thé feeling and the control of my slice in backhand and i love cross short angles with my forehand or offensive flat along the line. In serve, I use slice and Kick. Never flat. Better for me to stay with my VcorePro100 or change for Vcore100 or Vcore98?
A high launch angle is not great for a sliced backhand, as it will produce a shot that floats rather than stay low and get through the court. Which is the reason why tight string patterns are generally the best on that shot. There is, however, a way to tame it in frames which have an open string pattern, which is to use a round poly string with good control. My favorite one when I use open 16x19 patterns is 4G Soft. It lowers the launch angle, which provides me with good control on the backhand slice, and allows me to flatten the ball on the forehand.
I know VCORE is the "spin" racquet of the Yonex Family. But has no one compared the throat of the VCORE and the EZONE? The EZONE throat is basically identical to the Pure Aero, while the VCORE throat is closer to the Pure Drive (and VCORE PRO is same as the Pure Strike)? Is it just me, or does it just seem like marketing bs. How is it the Pure Aero frame and the EZONE frame are more similar than the VCORE frame, but no one has an issue with accepting that the Aero and the VCORE are the "spin" machines? Or are there other features that make them the spin machines they are marketed to be?
Still learning tennis. But I'm really stuck between getting the new Pure Aero 98 or the VCore 95 or 98. The Pure Aero VS is currently my favorite racket. But the 61/62 RA rating is really tempting on these.
Frankly, if you are still learning, it's better to stick with 100 sq.in. At a push, you could try a 98, but a 95 is going to do your game no favor. Not just in terms of power, but in terms of tolerance to mishits. There are two types of players who can get away with a 95: - very good players (5.0 and up) who have got very good technique and hit the ball very clean - old timers (like me) who hit more flat because that's how they learnt tennis back then, probably with a smaller racquet
@@johnnyguitar6697 I have a couple 100 inch rackets. Regular Pure Aeros. But I seem to like the 98 inch more headlight rackets better(Pure Aero Vs, Extreme Tour). I feel a little more connected to the smaller head size.
@@johnnyguitar6697 Thanks. I'll probably look at the VCore 98. Probably wait on a few more reviews before deciding between the VCore 98 and Pure Aero 98.
Good review again… I’ve been following you for a few years now and I don’t know if this was specifically the playing footage you used for this video but your tennis seemed to have improved quite a bit. Looked good out there: good pace and great movement. Good job!
Two reasons : 1) "This was specifically the playing footage you used for this video" 😂 2) The tall guy was a good player and got dialed in with the Vcores with no problem. Yet his serves lack pace, indicating customisation was necessary for more serious play. The consistency and non-aggressive play of the tall guy benefited the opponent though 😆. In a sense, just like feeding balls. The ball path (and the placement) was consistent, giving tennis nerd more than enough time to set up 😆
That’s what I did one ear ago. It is noticeably less powerful, but you gain a lot on control. I used Hyper-g with the PA VS at 50/48 lbs, I found that VCore plays better with PolyTour Pro (softer and more powerful) at the same tension
Hi, Jonas. For those who suffer from tennis-elbow issues, which line-up of Yonex' models shoud we go for: Vcore, Vcore Pro or EZone? Saludos desde Murcia 😃
te recomiendo la línea sx de Dunlop, son potentes, con excelente spin, pero a la vez bien flexibles, con un poliester soft tipo Hiper G o TOUR BITE a no más de 45 libras no deberías tener problemas, siempre mantenerse alejado de RA s superiores a 68.69. Otra opción en esa línea Head Extreme MP.
@@raul.tortosa está versión con 65 de RA debería ser mucho más flexible que su antecesora. Igualmente la cuerda es el 50%. Normalmente el codo de tenista es una combinación de raqueta muy rígida con tensiones altas.
Congratulations and Thanks for your review, it really helped me understand more about the difference and what to expect. Today I am using Ezone 98 2022, Do you think there is much difference between both and what improvement New Vcore brings?
According to tennis warehouse university data, there's minimal difference in effective hitting weight at different points of the stringbed (2023 vcore 98 Vs 2022 ezone 98). They're practically even. Keep in mind they probably use only one racket per model to get the data though, so quality control always a factor. However, what the above means, on paper, is that they should have about the same power potential. Hitting weight is a huge factor in determining how well the racket wins the battle of ball Vs racket you see, with the better it wins the battle the more energy that gets transferred to the ball leaving the racket. More power. But these two are getting basically the same data here. So power should be similar. However, there are different variables. One big one that comes to mind here is that the vcore 98 has a faster swinging beam, especially if you have more modern spin technique. So in this regard you might be able to get the vcore going with easier force, giving you more power. Another difference between the two is the launch angle. The vcore has a higher launch angle. Whether that's good or bad depends on you as an individual player. If it doesn't play to your liking, you can lower the launch angle through customisation, string choice, and/or increasing the tension. But as a base if super high launch angles aren't your thing it's probably best to skip it. Taking the above into account, the slightly lower launch angle of the ezone will make it easier to apply more time pressure. As in, you can more easily rob your opponent of time by the ball reaching your opponent more quickly (like in a linear racing game with main path and shortcuts, in a way). So in this sense, for a player who wants a more direct but still spin focused racket, the ezone may have slightly more effective power. The ezone has a slightly more precise feeling stringbed. The vcore has an ever so slight advantage in effective comfort thanks to lower vibration count. I'd say on average the vcore 98 is for modern spin focused players that want a blend of precision and high kicking topspin or direct hitters who lean towards higher launch angles for safer margins (less likely to hit net, dipping trajectory helping more balls stay in, potentially, for certain play styles). The ezone 98 is more for modern baselines who favor a blend of a blade and an aero, so a more balanced approach where they may mix up flat and heavy spin more often or a heavier spin player seeking among the most precise stringbeds among spin kind of frames. Personally I prefer the vcore 98. Spin is a big part of what I want to do on the court, and I find the vcore slightly more to my liking. However, the previous version of the vcore 98 has higher effective mass at key areas than the 2023 version. In reality this means it should hit a harder more effective ball. One of the things that's usually missed is that players, rec or pro, ideally want to have good effective hitting weights where they make contact with the ball. So in my case, to get my target hitting weight range with the 2023 version, I'd need to have a slightly higher spec. Which is easy enough to do with customization. But one of my priorities is to have a low spec with high hitting weight values, so it's an unnecessary sacrifice for me that I'd avoid. But others will have their own findings and conclusions as we all are different players with different skills, strengths and weaknesses, swing styles, and so on. There are always some unknown elements though for us as individual players and how we will find such and such racket and spec etc. So really the best way is generally to try for yourself.
Tennisnerd have you tried head lynx tour in the 95? The 1.25mm runs thicker more like 1.27 and so has quite a low launch angle and I'm wondering if that mixed with control and spin potential of string could make it one of those magic fits. I haven't tried myself I'm considering buying this frame though.
Head Lynx Tour 1.25mm champagne is my go to string. I currently use the VC95 v6 customised to static weight 352g, swing weight 330, leather grip + overgrip, weight at 10&2, tension 50lbs. It’s a magic wand for me. Recently tried the v7 with the same setup, slightly higher tension but doesn’t work. The difference is the frame layup/geometry and flex changes in the 2023 model. Yonex have lost that VCore DNA, I feel although I haven’t tried the 2018 model but the shift to make their rackets more flexible is losing customers to better frames out there. I’ll be trying out my VC95 v7 with a slightly higher tension 52/50(mains/crosses) and a little weight(2 grams total) at 11 and 1. I now completely understand why Karue Sell strung his VCore at such a high tension to tame the launch of the open 16x20 string bed in the v7. I believe Karue also used Head Lynx Tour champagne when he used to use the v6.
How is its power+spin potential compared to Head Extreme Tour? I really like the Head but 305 g is a bit too light (I use EZone 98 Tour), but I didn’t like the previous VCore 95’s swingweight.
Is the 95 an alternative to my RF Pro Staff 97 in terms of feel and control ? I want to have something with a little more power and a lighter weight than the RF. It has to be quick through the air. I really enjoyed the RF 90s because of hof fast they are through the air and the control but they are too small for todays game.
the yonnex is gonna have way more power and flex. they are essentially two different rackets. if u go from pro staff to v core, you will essentially lose everything that make that makes the pro staff what it is
i have been playing with a 2018 vcore pro100. thinking of getting a 98 instead of 100. would be hard to adjust when playing both reackets interchangeably during games? not pro and not competitive player. just social player abt 3.5 who aims to return shots consistently to get rallies going. any suggestions welcome!
Not sure If I would like overly muted racquets. My arm would certainly benefit, but my volleys and drop shots not so much. I am currently playing the Ezone Tour 2022, this thing doesn't even care about a dampener, because there is nothing left to dampen!
I’m a big fan of the VCore line using the current v6 version. I recently demoed the 2023 VCore 100 for about a week. It came with a poly in the mains and a syn gut in the crosses. My guess is that it was strung at around 52 lbs. Initially, I also had some problems with the balls flying long on me. This racquet has more power than the previous version. However, I got accustomed to the great feel and pocketing of the racquet and learned that it could take a fast swing if I could manage to impart more spin. I’m very much a senior player, playing against guys 10-15 years younger. I’m also pretty much a doubles player due to some knee injuries. Despite that, this racquet gives me access to power and depth that can stymie returns or set up a put away volley. Some guys in my age spectrum use a much lighter racquet that seems to work well enough for their games. However, I prefer more heft and plow through which this racquet delivers. Serve power was also improved over version 6. Yes, at $270 this racquet is a hefty investment. Still mulling over whether the enhanced features merits an expensive upgrade. As always, I enjoy and appreciate Tennis Nerd reviews!
It's worth remembering that Yonex grips seem to run a little larger than normal.
So if you usually use a 4 3/8, consider 4 1/4
I think they feel bigger because the buttcap has less flare and you hold it lower?
Because it's actually not but I've felt that way before as well
But these other brands have also changed sizes.
Totally agree. I play 3/8 in Head and Wilson but 1/4 in Yonex.
my Yonex is the same size as my Wilson. I think Head is the one that is smaller
This is actually due to the wrapped part of grip being thinner. So stock, the overall size is the same as other brands. But if you replace the grip, it's then thicker. Likewise, putting the stock Yonex grip on a Head racquet will make the overall grip size smaller. Even leather grips are thicker than stock Yonex.
Agree i think this is the reason, yonex stock grip material is thinner. When i replace my main grip i have to use wilson featherthin@@josephduchene5849
Great review as always. Spot on too. I am an intermediate player 52 age, Even i had the 100 and even i had to switch to the 98 to get control. 98 is one of the best in the market. gives me the best overall game...good power, nice depth, great at slice and one arm backhand.
I got it for tha same reasons, it’s great for one handed backhand and top spin forehand
Recently purchased the Vcore 95s after demoing for a week. I had demoed both the 95 and 98 but loved the 95 so much I barely even hit with the 98. I just knew the 95 was the one. Coming from a 97 inch frame I really didn’t notice much of a difference going to this 95. It’s got great feel and comfort, good control at least for me, and very good spin potential.
launch angle on the 98 was nuts. everything was sailing for me compared to my Ezone. need to try the 95
In a good way or bad way
Would love these but the prices are absolutely outrageous lately, hopefully I can pickup a 2021 vcore on sale once these are released
Yen vs dollar/euro has gone down a lot, so Made in Japan products could/will be significantly cheaper in 2023
We can hope at least 🤷♂️
Just ordered 4 v core 95 2021 models. They dropped to 199.99
@@paulsteezo1772 what setup do you use with them, I hated the demo with the string tension and all that
I haven't strung them yet. Waiting till about April when warmer weather gets closer. Always loving technifibre X-1 Biphase 17ga at about 52 lbs. Will experiment with lead and a leather grip
@@paulsteezo1772 still crazy honestly
Feel like I just watched the 21' vcore reviews, time flies
If you're a decent player and searching for a new racket try these three, they are all GREAT! Yonex EZONE 98, Yonex Vcore 98 and Wilson Blade 100. (latest versions of all). I was surprised the Blade has as much power as it does!
I had the pleasure to try the Vcore100, Pure Aero, Head Extreme MP, and Dunlop SX300 side by side last week (thanks to Tennis Plaza Miami). For me the fight is between the Aero and the Extreme. The Vcore100 felt way too muted for my taste
What is your final decision?
What do you think about rockets in terms of sweet spot size? Where it is more forgiving? I've tried aero 2019 and would have more or less same size sweet spot and 25% less power and a little bit less stiffness. A little bit more plush. What could you advise in my situation? Thanks in advance
Can’t wait for the radical mp review!
How's the power of the 95 compared to the 2021 95 ? Considering flex dropped to 61 but top of the beam moved up to 22mm. Cheers
Tommy Paul has switched from blade 98 to what looks like Vcore 98
Looked up the RA of the 95 and 98 - 61 and 62, respectively. Yonex has the right idea.
Tommy Paul switching to Yonex, right now on Adelaide 2 vs O'Connell
Hello!! Thanks for the review!! Wich version do you think is better? Vcore 98 2021 or 2023?
What string and tension you think has more control the Vcore 98?
Looking at the 98 and stringing it with Babolat RPM Rough 17 at 53lbs to really dial in that spin
I wouldn't do that, IMO RPM rough doesn't have that good of spin or control, so it would be too launchy in the 98. I would stick to a shaped and lower powered poly like maybe hyper G or volkl cyclone around the same tension
@@raderT90 hyper g was the other string I was considering. Thanks for the feedback I think I might just go that route
Like you sneaking in the Radical towards the end LOL
Nice review, I'm surprised you did not use the same string as a baseline to make a more accurate comparison between the frames but you gave your reasons. I moved to the Ezone 98 2022 from the 2021 Vcore but doubt I would move back as I get enough spin, power and control.
Any elbow or wrist issues with the ezone?
@@MrFunkyko personally, I had to add some weight to the ezone 100 to get that super nice plush feeling (10 grams) but BOI ever since I did that it has been a dream to play with! I feel like the added stability really does a lot for comfort. (Strings I use are Luxilon element.)
@@MrFunkyko nope
Love the content TN and very jealous of your weather! But completely agree about the lack of feedback and feel nowadays from most brands. I switched from the 2017 PureAero to the 2018 Vcore 98 and loved it, still using it today as my main stick. It is a more powerful racket than the PureAeros IMO but have upped my tension a tad over the years to limit shots going long. Volkl Cyclone is my go to string with the Vcore. Have to say i hated the 2021 vcore update, yonex completely numbed the feel in that and so debating whether this 2023 version is worth a shout still? I guess its still very similar in that department? If you had to choose TN would you go new 95, the 2018 95 or old SV95?
Which racket would you choose to be more complete and better? pure aero 2019, yonex ezone 100 2022, yonex vcore 100 2023? Thank you
Certainly on my list to trial along with VCorePro 97. The VCore 98 looks most adaptable and control-oriented but with some power of the 3
The 18x20 is soooo nice
@@cadethompson3617 Elaborate further please? I am going to be doing a racquet review on the VCorePro 97D 18x20 whenever I can get my hands on one that doesnt = losing a solid part of one's weekly wage!
I have the 2021 VCorePro97H, which has phenomenal plow through, but is quite heavy. Watch out for over-spec rackets (heavier than the target weight), which can put strain on your arm (from shoulder to elbow to wrist), if your strokes aren’t perfect (most of us).
Of course, 16x19 will offer a bit more spin, and 18x20 more control.
Ideally, try lots of rackets with different strokes (flat and spinny groundies, serves, volleys, …) to see which racket suits you best. The specs are only somewhat useful. Then, ask your stringer for recommendations, based on your play style and any issues.
Thanks for the review. Hit with the outgoing 98 since it came out. Can't wait to try the new one. Also trying the prince ats 98 this week... Wondering which one will be the keeper. Whats your say comparing those two?
Question for you and the community. Does the vcore 98 has more power than a vcore pro 100? What has a bigger impact on the control vs power scale, headsize or the flex of the raquet?
I just tried the 98 and 100 today. The 100 is more powerful, but the ball shoots off the string bed fast. As a result, I don't have much time to put more spin to the ball, which translates to lower control for the 100. The 98 has a longer dwell time and very good feel at impact. I have the chance to do more to the ball because of the longer dwell time and can hit a heavy ball. So I'd say 100 is for beginner who don't have developed techniques yet. And 98 is definitely more controlled and hits a heavy ball for people who have the right swinging motion. Also, 98 isn't that hard to use compared to some other typical control oriented 98 that are targeted at really good players.
In summary, 100 is easy to use, targeted at casual players who don't have fully developed techniques. 98 will be stronger than 100 in the hands of people who have the right swinging motion, and is much easier to use compared to some of the other control oriented 98, such as radical mp, tf40, blade v7.
@@fluffy_skye the 100, various gens of it, is more commonly found on the pro tour seemingly than the 98 vcore. Granted, that's balanced that way thanks to the wta tour, but the wta tour are better than the majority of tennis players in the world.
Let's also note that the top spin specialists on the male pro tour use equivalents to the 100. The leading average forehand RPM players largely use such frames. And there's a reason for it. The launch angle is higher. Access to spin is easier. A pro player can't let ego decide their equipment. They will use what works. And it's no coincidence that players quite often dial into their strengths with their setup, and customisation plays a huge role in this as well.
It's actually all not so simple. At a basic level, the 98 is actually a less effective racket. It is inferior compared to the 100 in winning the battle of ball Vs racket. The 98 would require a heavier spec in order to match it, and any advantage in swing speed with a thinner smaller head would be cancelled out by that heavier spec.
The 98 has its own advantages though. Namely, slightly more control over targeting. It also has a lower launch angle. A lower launch angle can put more time pressure on an opponent, as it takes less time to reach your opponent. For beginner/intermediate/lower advanced players, in stock, who don't have good control over their swings yet, the less effective stringbed (doesn't win the battle of ball Vs racket as well as 100 in stock) can be like an assistant. It helps you to control the ball. It's like how a pure drive helps a beginner hit with more consistent depth. A 98 can potentially help you keep more balls in. You have to bring more of your own control with the 100. One of the best ways to do that is to use a lot of spin.
However, most rec players would play better with the 100, even if they don't think so. Most rec players don't hit overly hard. They don't have much control. They're not very fit. The fundamentals just aren't there in most cases. The 100 has a more effective hitting area. This means you don't have to be as accurate. You have more effective mass at different points on the stringbed, and in reality this translates into less variation in depth and pace under pressure. So play anyone any good and the 98 in the hands of the majority of rec players is going to feed the opponent some easier balls. But given enough time on the ball, the less effective stringbed of the 98 can help keep more balls in by helping the player with control (more precise stringbed and in stock more lost energy at contact, meaning a weaker ball less likely to sail).
A high level player using the 98 may opt for a heavier spec to increase the effectiveness of its hitting area relative to the players needs including contact point. Some may even use it fairly light but swing speed makes up for it. Alcaraz would be a great example, who uses a near stock spec Babolat pure aero Vs, a direct competitor to the vcore 98.
But make no mistake, both the ATP and wta have plenty of 100 users. So this idea of them just being for beginners is entirely false.
Op. Yes and no.
The first bit I'll go with is power Vs control scale. The better a racket wins the battle of racket Vs the ball the more control and power you can find with the racket. It doesn't necessarily mean you'll actually get more control and power by increasing its effectiveness in this area. Even at the top level. Simply, the more effective mass where you make contact with the ball the more power and, technically, control, with other factors playing a role. You can have two rackets, one that's 300g and another that's 315, but the 300 one could have more effective mass. To increase the effective mass, you can do things like increase its swing and twist weight. Of course, other variables also contribute, like string spacing/pattern and all the other things. For example, a pure drive has very effective hitting weight values, as it literally hits like a heavy racket. But it doesn't have great directional control. Design choices, and quality control, also dictate the effective hitting mass at different points of the stringbed out of the box.
On that note, according to data you can find on the tennis warehouse university site, the vcore pro 100 (keep in mind quality control, even with Yonex, as you could put two of one model against each other and have one winner) is the more powerful of the two. It better wins the battle of ball Vs racket across stringbed.
I have not actually personally tested the vcore pro 100, but I'll assume it's stringbed does not provide the same ease of access to spin as the vcore 98. The vcore 98 may have a higher launch angle potentially. The vcore 98 should swing faster as well, so depending on the swing style this could quite easily play a role in the outcome.
My technique is quite whippy and modern, and I suspect in stock form I'd find my range and more effective hitting with the vcore 98 over the vcore pro 100. But flatter hitters may find more success with the vcore pro 100 for example. But it isn't necessarily as black and white as this.
Everything comes together really to form the outcome. So head size, string pattern (and string spacing at key areas for you), beam shape/thickness, layup, RA, racket length, strings, tensions, it's spec, and so on all affect its performance. And what performs best in what areas will also depend on the individual player. So just because a racket is slower on paper for example it doesn't always mean a given player will hit a less effective shot with it. There are numerous variables. It's about pairing the player with the setup.
In a basic sense, there will be traits you'll gravitate towards over time though. This can even change over time. But my point is through trial and error you can find things you like in a racket and that can begin to narrow the range you like. And all the UA-cam reviews in the world aren't going to tell you what you like, as in you personally like or find with a racket. You'll have to find out for yourself.
@@fluffy_skye wta use vcore 100 and you dare say it's not for advanced players
The new '23 VCore 98 is now my primary. Very plush. Very easy to use!
How would you compare the Vcore 98 to Ezone 98?
I’m demoing the 2021 vcore 95 and I like it. You think the new one is better? Is the power much different?
I tried the Iga and did not like it because of the power. That’s why inlike the Vcore 95 but hace used it only 3 or 4 times.
Which one would you recommend, the new vcore or the 2021 vcore?
I drive the ball with topspin. I have a one handed backhand.
I know you said this is your favorite vcore 95 yet in the video.
Excellent roundup review with really useful information.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I used to like stiff racquets because I could feel connected to the ball and had the best feedback
Obrigado! Nice job! Have a good year!
Thanks Samuel! Muito obrigado
For Vcore 2021 (98) users: Yes, the 2023 is more powerful. With the same settings I used with the 2021, the first couple of days I just couldn't keep the ball in the court with the 2023. BUT!!! I added two pounds and I just love this new version. I felt I didn't lose control and gain more depth, more bite on my serve and maybe it's me but also better results when blocking returns.
What do you mean added 2 pounds?
@@5ammy13 I think he means the string tension he added two pounds to
@@TimelyAdventure ah okay makes sense. I was thinking purely in terms of racket weight and wondering how one would add 2 pounds to a racket lol. If just assumed he meant 2g 😂
@@5ammy13 that’s what I thought at first 😂
The 100 sounds like my 2019 aero, but with more comfort.
Thank you for your good contribution. Question about the Yonex Vcore 98: I play the previous model. and as a tennis teacher, I really appreciate that he is grip-heavy. I notice the top-heavy racket in my arm after several hours. Is this new model just as grip-heavy? Thanks and regards Marcus
You and many often talk about racquets/strings these days being stiffer and causing a lot of arm issue for people. But then anytime you and I test racquets that come with dampening that make a racquet comfortable and arm friendly, we complain about losing the feel of the ball.
So how should a racquet be made? what racquets would you go for to have an arm friendly racquet? Since switching to nat gut I havent had arm issues but just curious what you think about vibration dampening racquets
The Vcore 95 shape has changed a lot form the 2021 and it made a huge difference ! So that is a drastic changed
You forgot about the best racket: Prince Tour 100p. Spin, Control, Comfort and power. It's like a Vcore 95, but then in a 100 inch.
Versus the Ezone?? What's your preference?
With all the dampening in the handle you mention would you ever consider adding a dampener on to the stings? I have a much older vcore and use a string dampener.
In your opinion, if you had to choose one YONEX racquet to go to battle with for DOUBLES only, which would you choose? Would that change if you were 65 years old? I would be grateful for your thoughts.
v7 is softer but i prefer the denser pattern from the v6!
Thx for the review! What are the pros / cons of the 100 vs the new extreme mp?
I would like to feel the racket very fast in the air, accelerate with a lot of wrist, kyrgios style, bublik (keeping proportions) and play with a lot of Topspin. If I want my racket to feel more agile and faster, is it a good idea to add weight to the 12 o'clock? Is it convenient for it to be a small space in the rim of the racket? If I put weight on the entire hoop, will the racket feel very heavy? I need help, I would appreciate it. I would like to feel the yonex vcore 98 as similar as possible to the previous version or better yet to the 2018 one
I bought 98 after using Aero… bro Thats the gamechanger, i feel the ball more than on babolat. Nice frame i want to try 95 now.
Great review!
Please tell us, if you can check, vcore 100 has more open string spacing than older 2021 version?
The 98 2023 has closer than 98 2021, we can see on another review on youtube.
Thanks!
How noticeable is the vdm in the 95? Does it ruin feel. Thank u
Great review and insight, really appreciated
Jonas, how are they with the one handed backhand and with flat hitting??
Always very insightful and helpful review. Thank you. I haven't demoed this racket yet but I am definitely going to. Currently using the pure aero for probably at least 6 years now (green version and I don't know what year they came out and also sure that they're not the 1st iteration). Just interesting knowing that this is a spin racket but used by Rybakina who I think could be considered as flat hitter? Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.
How did it compare with the 2018 vcore 95? Was the R/A the same?
That was the best version of 95
I've only gotten to try the new 98 and I did a review on it. We have some similar but also differing observations. Excited to try the 95 as well and should be soon! Hoping to love it.
I’m interested to hear your take on why no pro’s use this vCore 95 even though most play testers seem to agree that it’s a good racquet?
You might recall I have an Estusa Power Beam braided (my favourite raacquet). I have been advised to try Yonex as I need another racquet ( I have two Head Flexpoint Prestige but don't use them much). I want to give the 95 a try. The Estusa is listed as 92 sq inch but in reality it is more 95 in size, good size sweet spot due to unusual head shape. I think Yonex will be similar.
You get spin from the string not the racket. All the modern strings are polyester. Hexagonal, square etc. Go for a 17 gauge string. 1.18 or 1.23 and you will get a lot of spin. Racket manufacturers want you to think that you get spin from the frame but that is hog wash. But you will need a dampened frame to handle the stiffness of the polyester string. 😊
Hi Tennisnerd, another great review, thanks! By the way, I'll ask a question because I'm getting close to buying a new racket and I don't really know which one to buy. I am looking for a tennis racket that will suit my game. I play pretty hard topspin forehand and flat two-handed backhand. I have a good flat serve and kick. Will any of these tennis racquets suit my style? If not, do you have any suggestions? Thank you in advance and best regards!
How does the power and control on the 95 compare to 2023 Gravity Pro? I’m curious as to wether I’d be sacrificing a bit on this to gain more spin?
Which in your opinion do you recommend? The new vcore 98 or the new upcoming babolat 98? In terms of control and spin.
vcore 98 2023 vs pure aero 100 2022. which one do u prefer mate?
Which one do you prefer. SHIFT or VCORE 95
Currently playing with 95 2021. Was excited to try this new vcore 95 but something just did not click for me. I'll probably demo it a few more times but I don't know :(... I could not hit a single OHB to save my life during practice.
How would you (or anyone in the community) compare the power level to the Pure Aero 98? Part of the reason I chose the 6th gen VCore over the Aero was because I felt I couldn't fully control my forehand on the Aero.
You can look at data on tennis warehouse university site. I'm not sure of their process exactly, but I assume they select one racket from each model to get the data, so we have to keep in mind that quality control is always going to be a factor (as in you could compare two of exact same model and get different results). This even goes for Yonex, whose quality control, while great compared to other brands, is hardly on point across the different specs (they're usually really good with static weight I've found, staying within the +/-5ish grams of their target, but even that makes a difference).
However, long and not so black and white story short, the pure aero Vs (haven't seen data for the new Aero 98 yet) should have higher effective mass on average across it's stringbed (hitting weight, which is not static weight). This means, on paper, more power.
Contrary to popular belief, Babolat rackets commonly have more effective hitting areas (forgiveness, meaning size of decent hitting area). And this is also the case here with the pure aero vs. this means, on average, the further away from the center of the stringbed you go, which is particularly important for modern topspin hitters who make contact further up on the stringbed, the pure aero Vs becomes notably superior in this regard (with very little difference in the center of the stringbed).
The model the 2023 version replaces, or at least one of the prior ones (but think it means the 2021 version), has a superior stringbed as well to the 2023 version. The lower RA of the new one will be contributing to that (although the 2023 vcore 95 has a superior stringbed to the original SV version I noticed, despite lower RA, highlighting how it's the sum total of design choices that matter).
However, note that it isn't always this black and white, even more so the better you get. The lower your level of fundamentals the more black and white it will be (so a pure drive will give a beginner easier power and depth than a Blade, but this isn't 100% of the time so straightforward at higher levels).
Point is. Try different rackets where possible if it's of interest. It's really the only way to really know for you personally.
But yea, on paper, if we take away the player and we just look at the racket itself, the pure aero Vs at least has more power. I assume the pure aero 98 will do as well.
How does this compare to the Ezone 98 2022? Is it as plush and provide similar control and power?
i wish that the next version of the 95 has 60 ra and no dampening
I've never played with a V-core, only briefly with the Ezone. How is it different from say the head speed mp, babolat pure drive VS etc? I didn't like the aero as the ball flys off the racket too much. I love the babolat pure drive from 2009 and 2012 but not the later ones
Thanks for the review! Just broke my Clash 100 yesterday and going to order the VCore 98 (will use your link to TW). What string & tension do you recommend for VCore 98? I'm a female, 3.5-4.0 player. Previously use Head velocity 17 (with 52, 53'ish) on my Clash 100. Play average 4-5 times a week.
Jonas I just tried the Yonex 100 in a 300 static weight(I know) and while pocketing, stability, power spin were fine I also tried a Technifibre T-fight 315 static that I thought was a 100 hoop but in fact a 98 hoop. Technifibre rumors were all true I simply hit a heavier ball enormous plough through man that was very noticeable, excellent racquet but off center power hitting punished more than the Ezone. So this week no Ezones available I'm trying a VCore 98. 100 size definitely fun I hear you but as you're totally familiar less accuracy. So I alsi demoed a Wilson Shift 300 light. It was fun at first but again off center wasn't as plush as Ezone but plenty of feel. The balance on Technifibre was best I ever tried off the shelf. I have a Babolat Pure Aero this weekend but made in China so not building my hopes up. I've heard from other UA-camrs launch angle took you long, that's partly why I'm trying my consistency with VCore 98. Thank you for your trademark candid review much appreciated! Can you do a string review please Jonas... www.grapplesnakeusa.com/collections/sets/products/alpha-set
Hi,
How would you compare the Vcore 100 vs the Ezone 100? I ma looking to buy one but when I look at the specs they are very similar.
Jonas you missed the last cross on the 98
Yes, noticed that BIG gap myself and then counted one cross less 18 instead of 19
did he? wow
Have you hit with the new Yonex VCORE 100+ 2023? Very curious to get your thoughts on this extended version of the Yonex VCORE 100 2023.
Hello nice video is Vcore 98 similar to Tecnifibre Tfx-300 in term of spin , control and power? Thanks
Vcore 95 2022 and Vcore 95 2021 which is better according to you Sir🎇
can't wait for the 2023 ezone! fundamentally, i am expecting more or less the same tech being used here in the VCore to be moved over to the ezone line.
The EZONE will not be refreshed until 2024. They released a new paint job in 2022.
Hello everyone. Tell me please. Which strings with Vcore 98 on AO does Tommy Paul use?
Thanks!
Higher luanch angle, is good or bad for the slice ?
I am playing with VcorePro100 since 3 years, but maybe i need something a bite more powerfull. But i don’t Want loose thé feeling and the control of my slice in backhand and i love cross short angles with my forehand or offensive flat along the line.
In serve, I use slice and Kick. Never flat.
Better for me to stay with my VcorePro100 or change for Vcore100 or Vcore98?
A high launch angle is not great for a sliced backhand, as it will produce a shot that floats rather than stay low and get through the court. Which is the reason why tight string patterns are generally the best on that shot. There is, however, a way to tame it in frames which have an open string pattern, which is to use a round poly string with good control. My favorite one when I use open 16x19 patterns is 4G Soft. It lowers the launch angle, which provides me with good control on the backhand slice, and allows me to flatten the ball on the forehand.
New 95 is the best ive hit. Attack or defend and the comfort is there. Hated the 98
How is the vcore 100 compared to pure aero 100, in terms of power, control and spin?
I really like the vcore 98. Everyone says that the ezone 98 has much more control. But i felt the opposite.
I know VCORE is the "spin" racquet of the Yonex Family. But has no one compared the throat of the VCORE and the EZONE? The EZONE throat is basically identical to the Pure Aero, while the VCORE throat is closer to the Pure Drive (and VCORE PRO is same as the Pure Strike)?
Is it just me, or does it just seem like marketing bs. How is it the Pure Aero frame and the EZONE frame are more similar than the VCORE frame, but no one has an issue with accepting that the Aero and the VCORE are the "spin" machines? Or are there other features that make them the spin machines they are marketed to be?
Still learning tennis. But I'm really stuck between getting the new Pure Aero 98 or the VCore 95 or 98. The Pure Aero VS is currently my favorite racket. But the 61/62 RA rating is really tempting on these.
Frankly, if you are still learning, it's better to stick with 100 sq.in. At a push, you could try a 98, but a 95 is going to do your game no favor. Not just in terms of power, but in terms of tolerance to mishits. There are two types of players who can get away with a 95:
- very good players (5.0 and up) who have got very good technique and hit the ball very clean
- old timers (like me) who hit more flat because that's how they learnt tennis back then, probably with a smaller racquet
@@johnnyguitar6697 I have a couple 100 inch rackets. Regular Pure Aeros. But I seem to like the 98 inch more headlight rackets better(Pure Aero Vs, Extreme Tour). I feel a little more connected to the smaller head size.
@@JohnSmith-pb4ri You might want to try the Vcore 98 and the Ezone 98. They're both good sticks. Ezone for more poser, Vcore for more spin.
@@johnnyguitar6697 Thanks. I'll probably look at the VCore 98. Probably wait on a few more reviews before deciding between the VCore 98 and Pure Aero 98.
What does everyone recommended the best string for the 2023 V-CORE 98
What are these rackets like for a single handed? Currently use the ps97 but want something with a bigger sweet spot.
if you are to choose one, would it be Vcore 100 2023 or auxetic xtreme mp?
Good review again… I’ve been following you for a few years now and I don’t know if this was specifically the playing footage you used for this video but your tennis seemed to have improved quite a bit. Looked good out there: good pace and great movement. Good job!
Two reasons :
1) "This was specifically the playing footage you used for this video" 😂
2) The tall guy was a good player and got dialed in with the Vcores with no problem. Yet his serves lack pace, indicating customisation was necessary for more serious play. The consistency and non-aggressive play of the tall guy benefited the opponent though 😆. In a sense, just like feeding balls. The ball path (and the placement) was consistent, giving tennis nerd more than enough time to set up 😆
Another great review! Thank you 🎾😎 This is THE racquet review channel
Thanks John! 🙏🏼
I guess my question would be...how much power do I lose going from a Pure Aero VS to a VCore 95?
That’s what I did one ear ago. It is noticeably less powerful, but you gain a lot on control. I used Hyper-g with the PA VS at 50/48 lbs, I found that VCore plays better with PolyTour Pro (softer and more powerful) at the same tension
Hi, Jonas. For those who suffer from tennis-elbow issues, which line-up of Yonex' models shoud we go for: Vcore, Vcore Pro or EZone? Saludos desde Murcia 😃
te recomiendo la línea sx de Dunlop, son potentes, con excelente spin, pero a la vez bien flexibles, con un poliester soft tipo Hiper G o TOUR BITE a no más de 45 libras no deberías tener problemas, siempre mantenerse alejado de RA s superiores a 68.69. Otra opción en esa línea Head Extreme MP.
@@pablogastonroig1621 Gracias por el consejo, amigo. No obstante, me gustaría probar alguna Yonex.
@@raul.tortosa está versión con 65 de RA debería ser mucho más flexible que su antecesora. Igualmente la cuerda es el 50%. Normalmente el codo de tenista es una combinación de raqueta muy rígida con tensiones altas.
wondering if you are going to review the vcore tour now that is finally available more globally?
would you say the previous gen is more control oriented than this version?
just ordered one after your review... very curious of the result 🙂
I hope you like it!
I really wished you had used the same strings and tensions in all of the racquets for a more accurate assessment...
Congratulations and Thanks for your review, it really helped me understand more about the difference and what to expect.
Today I am using Ezone 98 2022, Do you think there is much difference between both and what improvement New Vcore brings?
According to tennis warehouse university data, there's minimal difference in effective hitting weight at different points of the stringbed (2023 vcore 98 Vs 2022 ezone 98). They're practically even.
Keep in mind they probably use only one racket per model to get the data though, so quality control always a factor.
However, what the above means, on paper, is that they should have about the same power potential. Hitting weight is a huge factor in determining how well the racket wins the battle of ball Vs racket you see, with the better it wins the battle the more energy that gets transferred to the ball leaving the racket. More power.
But these two are getting basically the same data here. So power should be similar. However, there are different variables. One big one that comes to mind here is that the vcore 98 has a faster swinging beam, especially if you have more modern spin technique. So in this regard you might be able to get the vcore going with easier force, giving you more power.
Another difference between the two is the launch angle. The vcore has a higher launch angle. Whether that's good or bad depends on you as an individual player. If it doesn't play to your liking, you can lower the launch angle through customisation, string choice, and/or increasing the tension. But as a base if super high launch angles aren't your thing it's probably best to skip it.
Taking the above into account, the slightly lower launch angle of the ezone will make it easier to apply more time pressure. As in, you can more easily rob your opponent of time by the ball reaching your opponent more quickly (like in a linear racing game with main path and shortcuts, in a way). So in this sense, for a player who wants a more direct but still spin focused racket, the ezone may have slightly more effective power.
The ezone has a slightly more precise feeling stringbed.
The vcore has an ever so slight advantage in effective comfort thanks to lower vibration count.
I'd say on average the vcore 98 is for modern spin focused players that want a blend of precision and high kicking topspin or direct hitters who lean towards higher launch angles for safer margins (less likely to hit net, dipping trajectory helping more balls stay in, potentially, for certain play styles). The ezone 98 is more for modern baselines who favor a blend of a blade and an aero, so a more balanced approach where they may mix up flat and heavy spin more often or a heavier spin player seeking among the most precise stringbeds among spin kind of frames.
Personally I prefer the vcore 98. Spin is a big part of what I want to do on the court, and I find the vcore slightly more to my liking.
However, the previous version of the vcore 98 has higher effective mass at key areas than the 2023 version. In reality this means it should hit a harder more effective ball. One of the things that's usually missed is that players, rec or pro, ideally want to have good effective hitting weights where they make contact with the ball. So in my case, to get my target hitting weight range with the 2023 version, I'd need to have a slightly higher spec. Which is easy enough to do with customization. But one of my priorities is to have a low spec with high hitting weight values, so it's an unnecessary sacrifice for me that I'd avoid. But others will have their own findings and conclusions as we all are different players with different skills, strengths and weaknesses, swing styles, and so on.
There are always some unknown elements though for us as individual players and how we will find such and such racket and spec etc. So really the best way is generally to try for yourself.
Tennisnerd have you tried head lynx tour in the 95? The 1.25mm runs thicker more like 1.27 and so has quite a low launch angle and I'm wondering if that mixed with control and spin potential of string could make it one of those magic fits. I haven't tried myself I'm considering buying this frame though.
Did you try it?
Head Lynx Tour 1.25mm champagne is my go to string. I currently use the VC95 v6 customised to static weight 352g, swing weight 330, leather grip + overgrip, weight at 10&2, tension 50lbs. It’s a magic wand for me. Recently tried the v7 with the same setup, slightly higher tension but doesn’t work. The difference is the frame layup/geometry and flex changes in the 2023 model. Yonex have lost that VCore DNA, I feel although I haven’t tried the 2018 model but the shift to make their rackets more flexible is losing customers to better frames out there. I’ll be trying out my VC95 v7 with a slightly higher tension 52/50(mains/crosses) and a little weight(2 grams total) at 11 and 1. I now completely understand why Karue Sell strung his VCore at such a high tension to tame the launch of the open 16x20 string bed in the v7. I believe Karue also used Head Lynx Tour champagne when he used to use the v6.
more powerfull, Vcore 100 2023 or Ezone 100 2022?
Hi, do you try with grapplesnake tour m8? I want to try at 36/38? I use Sigmund fire at 43 w wcultra cable at 45… it’s a great combo for the new 98
How is its power+spin potential compared to Head Extreme Tour? I really like the Head but 305 g is a bit too light (I use EZone 98 Tour), but I didn’t like the previous VCore 95’s swingweight.
Is the 95 an alternative to my RF Pro Staff 97 in terms of feel and control ? I want to have something with a little more power and a lighter weight than the RF. It has to be quick through the air. I really enjoyed the RF 90s because of hof fast they are through the air and the control but they are too small for todays game.
the yonnex is gonna have way more power and flex. they are essentially two different rackets. if u go from pro staff to v core, you will essentially lose everything that make that makes the pro staff what it is
I know it is a very subjective feeling, but compared to which racket would you rather advise Yonex Vcore 100 or the Babolat pure aero 2023?
i have been playing with a 2018 vcore pro100. thinking of getting a 98 instead of 100. would be hard to adjust when playing both reackets interchangeably during games? not pro and not competitive player. just social player abt 3.5 who aims to return shots consistently to get rallies going. any suggestions welcome!
please compare power, maneuverability and spin with head extreme and PureAuro 98(VS)
Not sure If I would like overly muted racquets. My arm would certainly benefit, but my volleys and drop shots not so much.
I am currently playing the Ezone Tour 2022, this thing doesn't even care about a dampener, because there is nothing left to dampen!
Dampeners don't do anything for reducing vibration though.
hi! great videos!
Do you know when is that the v core 10 2023 will be available to buy ( what date)
Thanks! I don't know exactly, but they are available for pre-sale now and should be out early March.