I got a clear conceptual framework from this discussion regarding solving ABSOLUTE VALUE problem, thank you so much for such an outstanding discussion.
I am watching this 7 years later and it is fun to watch :D I hope people who participated in this webinar 7 years ago got into their dream business schools and I hope the ones who follow will do too. Thank you for this fun, insightful session :)
Explained very well! Except watching it as a recording makes it very long. Relevant Content is 20 minutes, but class interaction is very distracting/ interruptive. I learned the concept well. Thanks!
In the last question , we know that x^2 > y^2 , so they have defined places on the number line , so that means if y is negetive it will always mean that it is larger than x always , making the answer D perhaps ???
In the last question (Q. 5), what would be the answer if x= -(1/2) and y= -(1/3)? It agrees with the given constraint that x^2 > y^2. The question stem does not tell about the properties of x and y i.e., whether it is integer or fraction. So if we consider statement 2 only or combine both statements, we dont have any definite answer to the question. X could be greater or less than y. Would not the answer be E? Please clarify.
LAST Q - ans given by teacher is wrong - in option 2 - given x is neg (suppose -ve 3) and since y is not given, so y could be positive 2 for example (-3> 2 is not possible even though 9 > 4 ) so x cannot be greater than y , also if y is -ve then x will be leSS than y (-3
![Mastering the GMAT Remainder Concepts in Number System [Webinar]](/img/n.gif)
I got a clear conceptual framework from this discussion regarding solving ABSOLUTE VALUE problem, thank you so much for such an outstanding discussion.
I am watching this 7 years later and it is fun to watch :D I hope people who participated in this webinar 7 years ago got into their dream business schools and I hope the ones who follow will do too. Thank you for this fun, insightful session :)
Thank you very much for the wonderful video. The way you explained the concept is awesome. Appreciate that!
Thoroughly grateful for this wonderful lecture
Quick Q, in 2nd last Q , it is given X < Y, so can't we ignore the reflection of Y as X will always be left to Y . Hence, shouldn't the ans be D?
Explained very well! Except watching it as a recording makes it very long. Relevant Content is 20 minutes, but class interaction is very distracting/ interruptive. I learned the concept well. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
In the last question , we know that x^2 > y^2 , so they have defined places on the number line , so that means if y is negetive it will always mean that it is larger than x always , making the answer D perhaps ???
Where can I find the other videos from this 740+ webinar series?
In the last question (Q. 5), what would be the answer if x= -(1/2) and y= -(1/3)? It agrees with the given constraint that x^2 > y^2. The question stem does not tell about the properties of x and y i.e., whether it is integer or fraction. So if we consider statement 2 only or combine both statements, we dont have any definite answer to the question. X could be greater or less than y. Would not the answer be E? Please clarify.
Does it belong to gtb nagar
Very nice explanation.
Glad you liked our videos. For more videos, write to us at online@jamboreeeducation.com
Please upload more such videos. Or could you please tell me where can I get access to more such webinars?
Hello Sunayana, we conduct such webinars weekly. Register at: www.jamboreeindia.com/Events
Questions and explanation atarte at 10:14
great work
Glad you liked it.
Cant thank you enough for this! :)
Um...could you please edit the webinar videos to cut out the breaks and small talk? Learnt a lot today :) ty for this video :))
Thanks Amrita
LAST Q - ans given by teacher is wrong - in option 2 - given x is neg (suppose -ve 3) and since y is not given, so y could be positive 2 for example (-3> 2 is not possible even though 9 > 4 ) so x cannot be greater than y , also if y is -ve then x will be leSS than y (-3
Good :)
" looking forward for " ?? its "looking for" or "looking forward to" ...... but that aside, nice video!!
Glad you liked this.