An another way to look at it is to notice how Adam (representing all of mankind) barely reaches out to God, and leans on to the earth. Meanwhile God reaches out fully to reach Adam, because God loves us and wants to be with us but as humans with a sinful nature, we barely make an effort to reach for God and rather cling on to earthly things.
yeah, well maybe he should not have dumped all this anxiety and pain and loss on us. Maybe we need a little more tangible help if we gonna believe all this crazy shit. And Idk what book you reading, but Old Testament God, his love is TOUGH love at best. At worst, he's a drunk child abuser that just lost his job and gonna flood us. JESUS loves us. God loves His message. But you're right, Adam is just too school for cool man. That dude smoked something
I really hope even more people become aware of this channel. These videos are just done perfectly: the narration, the original interpretations, the nuanced and insightful way you present the artworks, just the overall setup of the videos.... the pacing....I really appreciate these small gems and the work that goes into producing them. Thank you.
@@nebiyu.a4695 “what is the creation of Adam?” A pretty simple straightforward question is the stupidest thing you’ve ever heard? You must not get out much.
@@nebiyu.a4695not to mention completely wrong 😭 If you’ve learned about Michelangelo then you’d know that all of this is so wrong. He was DEVOUTLY religious and this would be considered blasphemous by anyone in those ages. Also the bellybutton point???? You really think that Michelangelo knew that bellybuttons even had a purpose? 😭
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl your point? are Christians not allowed to reminisce about their own religion?, including if its factual and not just the creation of fear mongering human beings
I love this change of perspective you're giving. Really, your videos are deeply insightful and, for me, they reflect on what I think is the most important thing about art: the challenge of the established preconceptions. Thanks for your work!
@Ana Begins The only ignorant one here is you, fort art isn't something written in stone, it's something that each individual interprets differently. Art is subjective.
No art is expression of the artists thoughts or feelings which is subjective. Look at music, poetry and literature there is always something the artist wants to convey. You are the one who is ignorant.
@@eaterbattery I believe an art piece’s subjective interpretation can exist only if the author deems the work itself subjective. If he doesn’t then any interpretations oftentimes hold much less substance than the original message as one can only hope to understand what’s inside someone else’s head, the only clues being an author’s biography and background. If I take, say Norman Rockwell’s “Freedom of Speech” and say “Well, I see this as a poorly-clad worker standing up to the oppression of the well-dressed bourgeoisie as he’s the one who gets to speak over them”, that interpretation would sort of work, yet ludicrously disregard the original idea that everyone deserves equal freedom of speech; the social standing of men depicted was picked out by Rockwell for a whole another set of ideas, certainly not socialistic or revolutionary ones. How can one express his own ideas in a world where everyone interprets them in their own selfish, often self-serving ways?
The shape of the drapery resembling a brain could also be a representation of God as the mind which operates creation. This would also have interesting implications since it looks like God the father is spilling out of the drapery with all the other figures as if the representation of God is not really what God is, just how God chooses to represent himself to Adam.
Carl Jung wrote that there was another meaning behind the religion. That God was the mind, when you pray its really meditation, to remind you of everything good you have. That heaven and hell were 2 different states of mind irregardless of your situation you could live your life in either great ecstacy or great despair depending on the way you perceived the world. And that you could be an angel or devil depending on which of those states you influenced in those around you.
Masterful video. I think many people take the idea of Gods being man's creation as degrading or even blasphamous, but when you look at the issue as humans creating ideas that could unite them, inspire them, teach them, and lead them better than they could themselves than it is beautiful. Gods being our creation doesn't make it degrading just as Human rights, Laws against slavery, or Ideals of freedom being our creation doesn't make it degrading. You can believe in something you created.
You know, this comment blew my mind. When you actually think about it, what if first man, or like early man created a supernatural force to believe in so he could have faith in all that is happening in the world. Maybe they needed strength, or to feel they were part of something. I mean, every religion does that. Even the pagans, believe in the idea of the universe or nature, maybe they just needed that super powerful force to believe in. Plus the greeks also have kaos I mean. Wow.
@@paulkihiu4743 You are actually on point - common myths and ideas are a social cohession, a uniting force of common values that can hold together massive societies. Religions and governments are reflections of our common traditions and values made manifest in a form of scripture, law, or just common decency. Sometimes we hold onto traditions for far too long and that's when an outdated law or a religious dogma may start to become too restrictive - our values change with time and conditions after all. I gained this amazing insight from the book *Sapies: Brief History of Humankind* by *Yuval Noah Harari* - it reads like a novel and packs more knowledge than a college degree. I would heartily recommend it to you.
God is above humanity, better than anything humanity could ever dream of making, it's turely blasphemous to think that a perfect being was created by the most imperfect things to walk the earth
The idea that god was created by people is always striking and impressive. It is always very interesting topic and always gives some depth to our cultures, philosopies and lives.
in my subjective opinion i think the painting represents humanity and the relationship they have with god, that why their fingers aren't touching. god is reaching out arm fully extended trying to reach and touch Adam, but Adam's hand is relaxed and unextend, all Adam has to do is to put his finger up and he has touch god but in the painting he's choosing not to do so, not only to me does it represent creation but also free will. again it's my opinion Michelangelo if he was still around would probably debunk what I said, but he's not around it's up to use to decided what things mean to us.
Fantastic. Loved this one. There is an artwork by Damien Hirst that explores the an uncannily inverted concept of this painting by Michaelangelo entitled 'The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living'. Regardless of how you interpret it, who doesn't love a mystery at the end of a day? Perhaps even the notion of God (or the workings of our own mind) being elusive, fickle or slightly beyond our reach is also what's just as enduring about this. Staring up at the roof evokes awe and wonder, much like our ancestors gazing up at the sky wondering. Dreaming. Imagining.
What a unique take. I’d never considered it before, but you almost have me convinced now. I almost feel like the relaxed state of Adam with the blank stare into nothingness, vs and the dynamic depiction of God, represents Adam in thought about why he is here on this earth. Reaching for the stars, contemplating what it means to live. To that note it brings life as to why their fingers are not making contact. Adam is reaching for something he can not physically touch, but God (something only Adam can see in his mind) is a contemplative thought reaching out towards Adam.
Michelangelo also heavily disagreed with the church in his personal writings. There’s a lot of history supporting the theory that this piece was a middle finger to the church. Very clever man!
I like the second interpretation, it makes sense. My teacher never asked my class to interpret it in our way. We’re always taught one interpretation at school and it’s the first one showed in this video. As if it was the correct one.
i really like the second interpretation it took me off guard at the beginning because i thought about it while also thinking about my religion but the moment i thought of it in a more philosophical way it made me thunk about how even if the painting shows what seems to be god and what seems to be adam it doesn't have to have a religious meaning or interpretation ,,, i dont know that just made me feel a lot more free for some reason haha
@GO GAMER 18+ if you think that you completely misunderstood what he said. He was saying he can appreciate the cultural impact of mythology. That doesn’t mean he believes in said mythology.
Another way to look at it is that the "brain", inteligence, consciousness is what made Adam, humanity, what it is, howbit differentiates from other animals
@@user-ti6ix5tn2o I meant it more in a way of understanding your physical presence in the universe not just going forward and following impulses and reacting to emotions but being conscsious and curious about your place on the Earth few animals achieve something close to that, one of the tests is whetever they understand, that the animal in the mirror is themselves
@@danielwordsworth1843 according to most researchers the mirror test is bias. Animals like dogs and blind bats with poor eye sights are treated an unfair and bias test. If the test is to determine your own unique natural smell emiting from your body. Ofcourse humans would fail but dogs would surpass
@@danielwordsworth1843 I understand what you mean but 1/ couldn't the "Holy Spirit" be both "spirit" as "intelligence"... and "spirit" as "animation", both conscious and inconscious, spirit and soul, "esprit et âme", both cognitive spirit and living spirit ? 😀 2/ Do you really think that human beings are more conscious and curious than animals of their place on Earth ? 😀 When I see what human beings have already done to Earth, I have some doubt about it 😀... and I don't see any animal species destroying the planet Earth on which they are living... like human beings do. 😀
I, like some others here, think the second interpretation leaves even more room for interpretation with the idea that both were created as a projection of Michelangelo. I think that’s kind of like the Gnostic idea of a divine spark being in each of us. Kind of a mirror of Merkabah mysticism, and how God’s throne lies at the end of a labyrinth within our own psyche. Maybe that lends credence to both interpretations being correct at some level. Creations, yet at some level, manifestations of God. God is, after all, described as transcendent AND eminent. Maybe we each experience that little God voice in our heads a bit differently. Maybe that’s why faith is a personal journey🙂
This is why it’s important that the discussion surrounding the interpretation of art must move beyond merely the artist’s intent and into what the art tells us about the artist, about its origins, about the world, about ourselves. We begin by asking what the creator means with their creation and proceed to wonder what the creation say about the creator. And that encompasses the interpreter as well. A perfect work of art to illustrate this.
Some thoughts that come to mind as i look at this painting: The mind of the artist is the god of its creation. Adam was created by God through the mind of Michelangelo. The artist brings his imagination to life. God is an artist and Adam is his masterpiece.
Watching this, I sort of came up with my own interpretation, where the figure on the left is actually God, and the figures on the right are Adam and Eve and their descendants.
Yes and they could be reaching out for god to seek his forgiveness years after committing the sin but God isn't willing to forgive so he's holding back and looks unbothered
@@rishitamalhotra7564 I thought of it as God doesn't need to save humanity, but chooses to save out of compassion. Man on the other hands, needs salvation, and hence is trying their best to touch God, similar to the story of the woman who was healed by just touching Jesus. But of course this isn't a mainstream interpretation, and it's probably wrong.
As a devout Christian/Catholic, Michelangelo probably wouldn't flip the role of the creator and created, but it's an interesting twist. God the Father, in the Judeo-Christian tradition, is a pure spirit, without a physical body. So the standard Christian understanding of humans, being "made in the image of God" is chiefly in human's soul/spirit, not so much the physicality like shape, size or color. God endowed human beings above all other animals with rational eternal souls, similar to His own. The two most important powers of this "spiritual/soul image" that humans get from God is the will and the intellect. Free will to choose love and intellect to know. A human being who know and love God, a human being who know and love his neighbors, fulfill the very purpose of which he was created for. The Judeo-Christian anthropology transcends race, genders, social-economic status of human beings. It gives humans inherent dignity, value and rights simply because he/she is God's most beloved creations, carrying God's very soul. This world view is beautiful and good for human flourishing. Totus tuus
How do you know he was devout? Was Da Vinci pious? I've long since believed that Da Vinci at least was something of a Deist. Like our founding fathers who believed in a "creator" and a higher power but conspicuously excluded Jesus or Christ or Chirch or even God from our most important contributions to Westetn Civ: Dec of indy and Constitution
@@burtan2000 I don't know actually. Only God can read hearts. His arts are heavily Catholic. Last supper, pieta, Sistine chapel,...I assumed one gotta be into the object of one's art to spend that time and effort perfecting it.
@@burtan2000 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." God was on the founders' mind for sure. The Creator gave these rights. Government is supposed to protect these rights. Life, liberty and happiness are all central motives of Catholicism.
As a catholic I'll have to disagree with this interpratation hahaha Though the interpratation of a man creating a painting which represents the creation of himself, created by God, brings my attention. Once I heard a thought of Tolkien, I don't remember how it exactly went, but was in the lines of: if we were created by a creator God, by his own image, then we would be creators as well, in the sense of creating art. And being an aspiring artist this motivates me so much, knowing that making art is an aspect of Our Lord we all carry.
Oh I absolutely love it! Now I'm disappointed for not having thought of that before! I love the idea that a god creating a being in its image makes this being a creator. And which of these beings are the ultimate creators if not artists? Brilliant! Thanks for the input!
I hope you are doing well, friends 🥰. I invite you to worship our creator and to see the evidence of his existence. In his book, the holy Quran, more than 1400 years ago: scientific miracles (expansion of the universe, the chemical composition of humans, the front of the head function, the mountains functions as pegs, factor determines Gender, and etc.….), historical miracles, metaphysical miracles, numerical miracles, linguistic miracles, arrangement miracles, the unmet challenge of bringing something like it, the preservation miracle, and others. The prophet of Islam, Muhammed (may blessing and mercy of God be upon him) miracles: the prophecies of his advent in the Bible and the Torah, the historical miracles performed by him that we knew by narrators, the scientific miracles In his sayings, the metaphysical miracles and knowing some things in the future by the knowledge of the creator, and others. Logical proofs: Religious comparisons, Issues in the religions except Islam, The superiority of Islam over other religions to guarantee rights and the survival of life, the innate of worshiping a god (mentioned in the Quran), the illiteracy of the prophet of Islam and the Benefits of saying that this Qur’an is from him, the perfection of our creation (mentioned in the Quran), and others. for further information, don’t hesitate to ask me. Watch these two videos prospectively, please. ua-cam.com/video/VwZwczHLAL4/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/BOoMxN8Qbm0/v-deo.html this is the most essential website for illustrating the evidence. www.islamreligion.com/en/articles thanks...
I know this video is over a year old, but thank you! It made me realise that my interest in theology and creativity culminates in an interest in simply art. Amazing content!
As myself being a Christian I have to say that though I disagree it still is a very interesting thought that I am a little suprised by(not rly bc I've heard of this idea bf) but I did like when you said that it can impact even people outside the Christian world and that hypothesis can rise from this work. Though in Christian theology God doesn't have gender nor a skin color when talking about the Father I found your idea interesting about what you said. Though Adam probably would've been a tanned person that God in a more "accurate" work would be tanned also since they are in the middle east where the people lived back then or Africa rather somewhat. I respect the fact that people might disagree with me but I either way enjoyed the video though it didn't convince me. Love your work man and have an awsome day everyone.
This is so cringe, every culture in the World, was depicted in a way that make them look like them this was in 15-16th century italy the christian god become the european god for example african countries can depict god as black if they want because they were also cristians, Just like europe can depict god as european
Well that was thought provoking and fun! As a Christian in the 21rst century, I think an argument could be made that both interpretations can be true, that neither interpretation cancels the other out. After all, it should go without saying that what we ultimately believe about God unavoidably reveals what we believe about ourselves. Thanks for the insights, they are genuinely helpful.
There are so many Christians in these comments being very narrow-minded about the second interpretation, as if the very idea and thought exercise is harmful in some way. It's refreshing to see someone who is secure enough in their faith to explore the idea. I agree with you, both interpretations can be true at the same time, a kind of symbiotic relationship between God and humanity. The point of presenting two different readings isn't to disprove one or the other, but rather to show that each view can reveal different ideas.
About the “god was the creation” interpretation, I noticed something: Say you just completed an art piece, just like Michelangelo. When you’re done, what do you do? You step back, look up at it, and relax for a moment, happy that the work is done, exactly like what Adam is doing in the painting. Idk probably just me looking to deep but still it’s interesting to me how it aligns
This is wonderful. I love a secular look at this painting. Honestly I find the secular interpretation more moving and rich in meaning than any ecclesiastical approach.
Please go in sequence to understand Creation of Man... *YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THIS UNTILL YOU ARRANGE VERSES IN CORONOLOGY* The Point is *How Angels know man or dominant or successor, will spread mischief Corruption and bloodshed?* How Angles know of Blo od 2;30? Angles don't have blo od in their body..... This clearly means There were creatures that had Blo od before humans and that use to fight, create mischief and corruption. Blo od means ??? Before man there was dinosaurs with blood that use to fight to control territory and fight of resources of territory SO CLEAR SO EVIDENT.. It means Man is built basically to fight and control all resources for himself. But education taught by God or Religion makes him Civilized, Sacrificing, Loving and Caring. Please go from Big Bang 2;117 / to 9 billion years of process to Creation of Earth 41;11 / 21;30 Decisions to create earth or process of creation of earth after Big Bang 79;29 Make up of Earth and creation of life with blood, on earth 2:29 *Check first sending of Iron the important constitution of Blood 57;25* No Iron No Blood *Then sending of water by meteoroids 78; 14 to first sea and first microbial life / 29;19-20 Botanical Big bang 78;16 / 19;31 and Creation of Oxygen to help warm blooded animals 79;33 The Panspermia and evolution in 3 dark periods (unknown to man/science) 39;6 and Then Creation of dirty stinking black mud from dying or Corpus of animal life 55;14 No black Mud or Teen No Humans… *After creation of Black Mud 7;12 38;76 / 15;33 Decision of Creation of man 2;30 and *Still Humans was not named Insaan or Basher 2;30 but dominant* *Creation of Souls of man or pre humans first and called first time Insaan 33;72* Then loading of all soul or all pre humans, in black mud and giving life to first man Adam and taking oath 7:172. Then creation of Adam from black mud 55;14 and educating Adam 2;31 / 7;11 (still not Hawa AS) They Adam show his education and Prostration and Creation of Satan 2;34 / 7;12 Creation of Satan 15;31 / 17;61 / 20;116 / 38;74 Then creation of Hawa AS and advised to live “”both of you”” in heaven 2;35 / 7;19 / 20;117 Then they ate the tree and sent down on earth temporarily 2;38 / 7;24 / 20;123 Then Humans started life on earth as short period 2;36 / 7;24 and as test 67;2 / 11;7 / 6;165.
Wow I’ve never thought of this painting as Adam creating “God” but now it makes so much sense. With the idea of God being in the brain and almost a thought of Adam, I’m interpreting this picture as Adam reaching for a perfect ideal version of himself, his highest self, and that is the idea of God. It’s above him, just out of reach, and you can tell Adam doesn’t have full faith in himself, which is why he’s lazily reaching out. But God has full faith in him, which is why He’s reaching out so confidently and erect. I think it’s perfectly fitting of what we as humans deal with when we’re trying to become better people and a better version of ourselves. All the doubt that we deal with chasing our “highest” aspirations. Amazing! This channel is amazing!Just earned a new subscriber! Thank you!
This was definitely a very interesting interpretation. I've never sat down to intently think about any religious art works, so this was a full exercise 😅
This was fascinating!! I’ve been on a “painting interpretation/explanation videos” binge recently, and the videos on religious paintings are by far my favorite. (I.e. this video and another video on the fallen angel portrait.)
I love your page dear one. I've been binge watching your videos since yesterday. Your intriguing narration has my mind in such a beautiful creative place. Looking at art as you talk has been like watching a great film. Continue to create content beautiful soul. 💖💖💖💖💖
You mentioned, that the red bubble that surrounds God and the angels, might be the representation of a brain. But I think, there is another way to look at it. That red bubble, might also represent a womb, supporting the idea, that Adam created God, even more. So, the red bubble is a brain on one hand, implicating, that Adam imagined a God, and on the other hand, also a womb, implicating, that through Adam's imagination of God, God was created.
this was the best video i have ever watched about art!!! thank you so much for doing this! as most of the young people, i have attention issues as well but i didnt get bored listening you for a second and didnt close the video in the middle of it! thanks again, keep up the good work
Id even take it a step further, because we don't know what the "real" Adam would have looked like-- this Adam and this God are both being created in Michaelangelo's image.
It's not the wrong image. You can even hear the illuminated sing to Adam now and the "event" is coming. Adam was code for "atom", the atomic structure in the center of our galaxy
@@24muneca3 "I was just an only child of the universe And then I found you, and then I found you You are the sun and I am just the planets Spinning around you, spinning around you" "I am a collapsing star with tunnel vision But only for you, but only for you My head is stripped, just like a screw that's been tightened too many times When I think of you, when I think of you" ua-cam.com/video/7YAAyUFL1GQ/v-deo.html
Amazing. I have always kept a distance from this painting because of my beliefs. I thought that nobody would interpret it as I did just because of the symbolism of the piece (yes, I'm that egocentric, lol). But today I decided to look it up. To me, the meaning of the painting has always been the latter. How else could we explain the strong connection to the thought that God is only in our minds? Those angels surrounding him could be those pushing religion as an agenda, in very simple terms. It's truely comforting when I find my observations to be on the right path. I think I'm going to like this channel.
Hi, when you talked about that 2nd modern idea of comprehension of "THe creation of Adam" I got an illumination. AND THIS 2ND IDEA SEEMS TOTALLY CORRECT to me. As a non christian man (in my opinion) this could be totally possible because in the religion is said that God created us, but as WE created the religion, soWE CREATED GOD TO OUR IMAGE as you indirectly said. Man I love your videos and your ideas, keep working as good as you are doing.
This essay reminds me a lot of my favourite part of Dan Simmons' Hyperion, in which he reinterprets the myth of Abraham as Abraham testing God as much as the other way around. İt made a huge impression on me when I first read it.* *Spoiler alert but it goes like this: Abraham fully commits to killing his son because if God intervenes then He is a God of love and therefore worthy of Abraham's affection. İf God doesn't intervene then He isn't a God of love and thus is undeserving of worship.
Also, may I add that the figures with God almost looked like they were supporting him, almost looked like they were holding him up. Why would a supremely powerful being require support?
Dude i am a scientist. Im not an artist or havent studied art, or nothing like that. There are thousands, tens of thousands of science channels on YT. But your's, about art and not science, is my favourite channel in the whole platform. Your content is just so great. DONT STOP !
I always thought that it was Adam, not God, who looked more comfortable in the painting. God, to me, is the one struggling to reach Adam, almost scaping from the creatures around him, and extending his finger, similar to the gesture of a newborn baby who reaches to the warm of their parents, to touch the slightly open hand of Adam, which appears more dominant. It´s also Adam´s hand position the element that strikes to me the most in this analysis, since although God is indeed a little bit more elevated in the painting, it is Adam´s hand, in contrast to his position, the one slightly upwards, dominanting God´s hand. But hey, I agree that this is a much more modern take on the painting, but I still appreciate the new perspective. Thanks!
The positions of their fingers give me the feeling that God is active, pointing towards Adam to give him life, while Adam's hand is passive, receiving it. The words at (4:30) are from Michelangelo??? Where did he write it? Is it a book?
I wonder if Adam ever see satan or lucifer I think he would beat them like here's my theory that if god sends Adam to defeat lucifer as he once said he was created in he's own image so imagine that satan attacked and Adam sees the attacked and reflects it back like ur fighting ur own self so when Adam sees it he though it is he's own image trying to do the same thing back to it
i love this channel, i dont come here a lot but everytime i do its always a great experience, unfortunately for you i have adhd and hyperfixate on random things quickly, that being said keep up the good work
I've always been taken with this line of thought from Alfred North Whitehead: "It is as true to say that God is permanent and the World fluent, as that the World is permanent and God is fluent. "It is as true to say that God is one and the World many, as that the World is one and God many. "It is as true to say that, in comparison with the World, God is actual eminently, as that, in comparison with God, the World is actual eminently. "It is as true to say that the World is immanent in God, as that God is immanent in the World. "It is as true to say that God transcends the World, as that the World transcends God. "It is as true to say that God creates the World, as that the World creates God.
Absolutely stunning. I want to get this as a tattoo, but I very much disagree with religion and the church. However, I love renaissance paintings and the thought of God being in a human brain, which the church very much disagrees with, makes me want it even more now. Thank you for this wonderful insight.
To think people would go so far as to think that God only exists in our solely in our heads, He is so far beyond our level of understanding, he truly is our omnipotent creator, the father of all things, May all glory come to Christ, the king of all kings
@@gabethenutpalma6033 If the Creator is so far beyond our understanding, who are you to insist so fervently that your interpretation of him is correct? Even if we assume that our universe MUST have been created by some kind of sentient being, there are thousands of other religions. What makes yours more correct? And what about all the dead religions which are no longer worshipped? They all believed just as fervently as you do in their own religions, that their Gods were real and the world would be destroyed if they stopped believing. And nothing happened! So what are Christianity's odds? And how do we even know any Earthly religion describes the true god? I won't believe a thing without proof.
@@saucevc8353 i wouldnt even need proof dude, I just wish he'd give us SOMETHING. It really feels like the universe has equal good and bad, without a great benevolent deity in the sky watching over us. Yin yang style. That's why I'm agnostic
@@okuyasuniijimura it's intrinsic properties of matter more specifically atoms to become an octet (stable form). I think that why we see opposing elements to everything, cause neutral can't be made without a "positive" and "negative".
@@okuyasuniijimura but the universe doesn't work under stability. Since you are not completely religious I assume that you belive in the big bang theory. When the universe was created there were an equal amount of matter and anti matter, they were formed in pairs. Matter and anti matter when together annihilate each other to leave only the purest of energy. If that was the case our universe would have been just energy. But every one in billion chances matter would survive the annilation and that matter is what that made our current universe. We seen bodies made of matter but not anti matter. The amount of anti matter is very low compared to matter in our universe. If everything was truly stable, nothing would've existed.
i've always thought that Adam is chilling, just there, not making effort to reach out. god, on the other hand, is fierce for the touch. Adam's relaxed posture always made me think that the holy being wasn't god, but Adam's life itself
Thank you... I have this painting on my wall in the Family/ Living Room. I've been fascinated with Michelangelo as long as I've been fascinated with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart ❤
another way to look at it a bit egocentrically is that the red drapes represent a womb and humans can create another human making them a god in some sense
I think another interesting way of looking at the 2 men in the painting would be not as separate people but rather as one person at different times/ages. The youthful Adam looks as though he is "limp" yet he has all the optimal physical attributes of a strong young man, meaning he has all the tools to be active, make use of his gifts and shape his future, yet for what reason? The reason may be the life he sees ahead of himself as now an older man but with a beautiful woman surrounded by many (possibly his own) children, which would fit into the traditional idea of the masculine dream. While he may feel tired to work towards this dream and can only reach out with seemingly low effort, his future is reaching for him in an active or, as used in this video, "dynamic" manner since it is what he(a man) is destined to become. To me this idea is plausible and at the least consistent in itself in addition to fitting into the idea of the masculine journey in both modern and ancient times. As a final note: What is there to "create" other than your very own future?
Very interesting how anatomy and dissection as first occurred during around 14th and became a normality by the 16th century in the study anatomy. "The creation of adam" really captures this with its attempts at anatomical preciseness of the figures and the "brain" behind god. Great vid!
It may come as a weak point of view, but I think it's possible he intended both interpretations. Even though the Renaissance had a strong Catholic presence, they still had a Roman (and therefore Greek) influence. Religious syncretism, especially in those days was something that was surely discusses at length. When the wine was flowing and Michelangelo and his friends were discussing art, poetry, philosophy and more, it's easy to see him coming to the conclusion that religion may be a creation of man. Does that mean it's blasphemy? Of course not. If an omnipotent God exists, there's no way he would be offended by mortal musings. Does that mean Michelangelo was a secret atheist? No. I'm sure he intended the painting to represent strongly both views. That's the tension that has kept this fresco as iconic as it is. It plays both sides. It seems unfair, and to the western mindset it surely is. But that's what makes it interesting.
You are projecting her e. Not only were atheist close to unheard of during these times {desist thinking was far more common} but there is no real reason for us to think that they weren't Christian. Vast majority of Greco-Roman thought wasn't atheist. It mostly talked about the divine
@@A-G-A-G that's just the people in control manipulating with fancy words... I believe the mind is conscious which is what humans always knew before all this mind trick mind control going on in today's world
What a fascinating interpretation! At first I was quite surprised by the thumbnail of the video which says “what if God is the creation of Adam” however, as I continue to watch, it surely does make sense of how God can or possibly be the creation of Adam. Especially, at the latter part of the video.
Hahaha I might have to change the thumbnail then! The goal of this video is not to refute the existence of a god, but to show the wide range of possible interpretations (even opposite ones) that a masterpiece such as this one can inspire.
@@TheCanvasArtHistory Ah, yes, it is after all only in the form of the question, the _exploration_ of the matter of a god's existence, or at least what Michelangelo's work can suggest about it, being the point central to the video.
Late but I think this perspective is interesting even if you don’t take it as “humanity made up religion”. Faith is by nature believing in something without concrete proof and our minds fill in the infinite gap. It’s all about perspective on how we perceive God
I will say, the use of the word “myth” can be offensive due to the fact that the word itself means false or untrue whereas those stories to many are truth.
The word carried connotations of something being untrue or at the very least and exaggeration of truth but I don't think the base word actually means that. Mythology without those connotations simply refers to the shared religious storyline of a culture or multiple cultures.
When i asked the question on the thumbnail to my Christian friend a few months ago, they got all offended and blasted at me for not believing in the absolute truth
Back when I was young and "Total Recall" came out, I was frustrated with the end because, though it suggested that the whole story might have happened in the mind of the protagonist, it didn't state it explicitly. It was only when I was older (having forgotten the movie entirely for years) that I realized this ambiguity was entirely purposeful, and by far a better ending, and meaning, than one or the other decisive answer. The same is true for Inception, where the ambiguity of the ending is the point. I think here with the Chapel, it's interesting that God and Adam are situated dead center. The progress in theory begins on one end and centers on the creation of Adam, but looking at it differently, it becomes a mandala, where the creation of God progresses backward in time, radiating out from the center. This is the nature of thought and memory, which generates from the ever-shifting now, both forward as planning and conjecture, and backward as memory. Memory, if you will, is our time travel, showing us the shape of that which no longer exists, and perhaps never existed. Even from a non-religious point of view, the creation of God could also be seen as the creation of man. Arguably, humanity is defined by our quest to understand the universe and what makes it tick. This quest ultimately becomes cyclical, bringing us back to ourselves, like a mobius strip or a mandala, radiating out from the self into the past, the future, and throughout the universe as we perceive it, and then back to our own brain, which is all we have to understand any of it. It's all happening in there, after all. And yet, the most comforting notion in the world, at least to me, is that when my brain stops working and turns to worm food, the universe, or God, if you will, goes on. If there is such a thing as immortality, it exists in the entirely conjectural place where the self and the universe cross over, right there in the center of the image. The place where Humanity creates God, while at the same instant, God creates humanity. The mystery of existence, if there is such a thing, that both are happening at the same time, at all times. Or maybe I'm reading way to much into it.
Beautiful interpretation. It could continue on and on and you just start looking at the image from a completely different perspective!! Cheers for that
First, I don't agree with making any carving or image representing anything in heaven or not in heaven. Because 1) God says not to do it 2) It makes people interpret it as a reflection of THE truth. An example is this picture, where many philosophers and scholars had tried to analyze this depiction of God (which is untrue) and make assumptions about who God is and what He is as if this is an irrefutable picture of God that exactly depicts God and all that He is. As is mentioned in this video, this is a modern way of thinking about how maybe God is an idea we came up with at some point in time and Michelangelo didn't hold this view. This is just a great painting he did, inspired by something he deeply believed in and wanted to depict. (Again, I disagree with doing so and God also specifically commands not to do so.)
Michelangelo was a known pagan and hid little nods toward the Christians saying "this is what I think of your faith." So, God being Adam's creation is an interesting interpretation that could very well be correct.
I also saw the drapery as anatomical, but I saw it as representing the heart, god being in the heart of humanity, which could align with the first interpretation. I love the way this painting show multiple meanings, even if unintended, that applies especially with what we now know
An another way to look at it is to notice how Adam (representing all of mankind) barely reaches out to God, and leans on to the earth. Meanwhile God reaches out fully to reach Adam, because God loves us and wants to be with us but as humans with a sinful nature, we barely make an effort to reach for God and rather cling on to earthly things.
Awesome analogy!
I absolutely love this insight
Well said
This is for sure what it was meant to show. how are people not seeing it lmao
yeah, well maybe he should not have dumped all this anxiety and pain and loss on us. Maybe we need a little more tangible help if we gonna believe all this crazy shit.
And Idk what book you reading, but Old Testament God, his love is TOUGH love at best. At worst, he's a drunk child abuser that just lost his job and gonna flood us. JESUS loves us. God loves His message.
But you're right, Adam is just too school for cool man. That dude smoked something
I really hope even more people become aware of this channel. These videos are just done perfectly: the narration, the original interpretations, the nuanced and insightful way you present the artworks, just the overall setup of the videos.... the pacing....I really appreciate these small gems and the work that goes into producing them. Thank you.
Yes
Just no. The video title is the stupidest thing ive ever heared
@@nebiyu.a4695 “what is the creation of Adam?” A pretty simple straightforward question is the stupidest thing you’ve ever heard? You must not get out much.
@@rohegarcia2802 bro. The creation of adam is the creation of adam. Its really obvious so i think its dumb
@@nebiyu.a4695not to mention completely wrong 😭
If you’ve learned about Michelangelo then you’d know that all of this is so wrong. He was DEVOUTLY religious and this would be considered blasphemous by anyone in those ages. Also the bellybutton point???? You really think that Michelangelo knew that bellybuttons even had a purpose? 😭
This was such interesting interpretation. I noticed that the veil behind God looked like a brain, but I never considered that he was inside it
Not at all he ignores that who made this picture were Christians
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl your point? are Christians not allowed to reminisce about their own religion?, including if its factual and not just the creation of fear mongering human beings
@@tanuki9333 he is twisting the crap out of that art in very unnatural way to force his beliefs on them
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl not at all lmfao
@@tanuki9333 yes. He is forcibly seeing his own beliefs in the art projecting his beliefs into it when there is nothing supporting his beliefs in them
I love this change of perspective you're giving. Really, your videos are deeply insightful and, for me, they reflect on what I think is the most important thing about art: the challenge of the established preconceptions. Thanks for your work!
@Ana Begins
The only ignorant one here is you, fort art isn't something written in stone, it's something that each individual interprets differently. Art is subjective.
No art is expression of the artists thoughts or feelings which is subjective. Look at music, poetry and literature there is always something the artist wants to convey. You are the one who is ignorant.
@@eaterbattery I believe an art piece’s subjective interpretation can exist only if the author deems the work itself subjective. If he doesn’t then any interpretations oftentimes hold much less substance than the original message as one can only hope to understand what’s inside someone else’s head, the only clues being an author’s biography and background. If I take, say Norman Rockwell’s “Freedom of Speech” and say “Well, I see this as a poorly-clad worker standing up to the oppression of the well-dressed bourgeoisie as he’s the one who gets to speak over them”, that interpretation would sort of work, yet ludicrously disregard the original idea that everyone deserves equal freedom of speech; the social standing of men depicted was picked out by Rockwell for a whole another set of ideas, certainly not socialistic or revolutionary ones. How can one express his own ideas in a world where everyone interprets them in their own selfish, often self-serving ways?
The shape of the drapery resembling a brain could also be a representation of God as the mind which operates creation. This would also have interesting implications since it looks like God the father is spilling out of the drapery with all the other figures as if the representation of God is not really what God is, just how God chooses to represent himself to Adam.
Oo love this addition
I remeber the scene which Robert Ford (Anthony Hopkins) say something similar in Westworld s1.
That’s exactly what I thought!!
Carl Jung wrote that there was another meaning behind the religion. That God was the mind, when you pray its really meditation, to remind you of everything good you have. That heaven and hell were 2 different states of mind irregardless of your situation you could live your life in either great ecstacy or great despair depending on the way you perceived the world. And that you could be an angel or devil depending on which of those states you influenced in those around you.
@@coldcrush5921 so basically "I can be your angle….or yuor devil"
Masterful video. I think many people take the idea of Gods being man's creation as degrading or even blasphamous, but when you look at the issue as humans creating ideas that could unite them, inspire them, teach them, and lead them better than they could themselves than it is beautiful. Gods being our creation doesn't make it degrading just as Human rights, Laws against slavery, or Ideals of freedom being our creation doesn't make it degrading. You can believe in something you created.
You know, this comment blew my mind.
When you actually think about it, what if first man, or like early man created a supernatural force to believe in so he could have faith in all that is happening in the world. Maybe they needed strength, or to feel they were part of something. I mean, every religion does that. Even the pagans, believe in the idea of the universe or nature, maybe they just needed that super powerful force to believe in. Plus the greeks also have kaos I mean. Wow.
@@paulkihiu4743 You are actually on point - common myths and ideas are a social cohession, a uniting force of common values that can hold together massive societies. Religions and governments are reflections of our common traditions and values made manifest in a form of scripture, law, or just common decency. Sometimes we hold onto traditions for far too long and that's when an outdated law or a religious dogma may start to become too restrictive - our values change with time and conditions after all.
I gained this amazing insight from the book *Sapies: Brief History of Humankind* by *Yuval Noah Harari* - it reads like a novel and packs more knowledge than a college degree. I would heartily recommend it to you.
@@theDoctorwitTardis thankyou so much for sharing this 🙏 this is like wow.
Yes
God is above humanity, better than anything humanity could ever dream of making, it's turely blasphemous to think that a perfect being was created by the most imperfect things to walk the earth
The idea that god was created by people is always striking and impressive. It is always very interesting topic and always gives some depth to our cultures, philosopies and lives.
God created people, not the other way around
@@cardboardcapeii4286nah
@@cardboardcapeii4286 proof of it is from a book that was written by humans
in my subjective opinion i think the painting represents humanity and the relationship they have with god, that why their fingers aren't touching. god is reaching out arm fully extended trying to reach and touch Adam, but Adam's hand is relaxed and unextend, all Adam has to do is to put his finger up and he has touch god but in the painting he's choosing not to do so, not only to me does it represent creation but also free will. again it's my opinion Michelangelo if he was still around would probably debunk what I said, but he's not around it's up to use to decided what things mean to us.
Do you belive that ideas pop out of no where in your head randomly?
@@biosavat9475 Yes and no? Most ideas are, even if you do not notice, drawn from inspiration. However each idea is unique in its own way.
@@biosavat9475 that's God showing you something
Fantastic. Loved this one. There is an artwork by Damien Hirst that explores the an uncannily inverted concept of this painting by Michaelangelo entitled 'The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living'. Regardless of how you interpret it, who doesn't love a mystery at the end of a day? Perhaps even the notion of God (or the workings of our own mind) being elusive, fickle or slightly beyond our reach is also what's just as enduring about this. Staring up at the roof evokes awe and wonder, much like our ancestors gazing up at the sky wondering. Dreaming. Imagining.
Absolutely 🤗
What a unique take. I’d never considered it before, but you almost have me convinced now. I almost feel like the relaxed state of Adam with the blank stare into nothingness, vs and the dynamic depiction of God, represents Adam in thought about why he is here on this earth. Reaching for the stars, contemplating what it means to live. To that note it brings life as to why their fingers are not making contact. Adam is reaching for something he can not physically touch, but God (something only Adam can see in his mind) is a contemplative thought reaching out towards Adam.
Well said
Michelangelo also heavily disagreed with the church in his personal writings. There’s a lot of history supporting the theory that this piece was a middle finger to the church. Very clever man!
Heart observation, made me understand a little bit more
I love this! Great video, and great interpretation! Very insightful! 👏👏👏
The other side of his brain
I like the second interpretation, it makes sense. My teacher never asked my class to interpret it in our way. We’re always taught one interpretation at school and it’s the first one showed in this video. As if it was the correct one.
i really like the second interpretation it took me off guard at the beginning because i thought about it while also thinking about my religion but the moment i thought of it in a more philosophical way it made me thunk about how even if the painting shows what seems to be god and what seems to be adam it doesn't have to have a religious meaning or interpretation ,,, i dont know that just made me feel a lot more free for some reason haha
It is a religious painting made by Christians........ You are projecting what you want to see. Nothing more or less
@GO GAMER 18+ if you think that you completely misunderstood what he said. He was saying he can appreciate the cultural impact of mythology. That doesn’t mean he believes in said mythology.
@GO GAMER 18+
you have an interesting thinking style.
Another way to look at it is that the "brain", inteligence, consciousness is what made Adam, humanity, what it is, howbit differentiates from other animals
Animals are conscious of their experience. Is a horse not conscious?
@@user-ti6ix5tn2o I meant it more in a way of understanding your physical presence in the universe
not just going forward and following impulses and reacting to emotions
but being conscsious and curious about your place on the Earth
few animals achieve something close to that, one of the tests is whetever they understand, that the animal in the mirror is themselves
@@danielwordsworth1843 according to most researchers the mirror test is bias. Animals like dogs and blind bats with poor eye sights are treated an unfair and bias test. If the test is to determine your own unique natural smell emiting from your body. Ofcourse humans would fail but dogs would surpass
@@danielwordsworth1843
I understand what you mean but
1/ couldn't the "Holy Spirit" be both "spirit" as "intelligence"... and "spirit" as "animation", both conscious and inconscious, spirit and soul, "esprit et âme", both cognitive spirit and living spirit ? 😀
2/ Do you really think that human beings are more conscious and curious than animals of their place on Earth ? 😀
When I see what human beings have already done to Earth, I have some doubt about it 😀...
and I don't see any animal species destroying the planet Earth on which they are living... like human beings do. 😀
I used to hate art but after a few days of watching your videos i'm starting to love it
I, like some others here, think the second interpretation leaves even more room for interpretation with the idea that both were created as a projection of Michelangelo. I think that’s kind of like the Gnostic idea of a divine spark being in each of us. Kind of a mirror of Merkabah mysticism, and how God’s throne lies at the end of a labyrinth within our own psyche. Maybe that lends credence to both interpretations being correct at some level. Creations, yet at some level, manifestations of God. God is, after all, described as transcendent AND eminent. Maybe we each experience that little God voice in our heads a bit differently. Maybe that’s why faith is a personal journey🙂
Exactly bruh, I think you have the best comment here.
This is why it’s important that the discussion surrounding the interpretation of art must move beyond merely the artist’s intent and into what the art tells us about the artist, about its origins, about the world, about ourselves. We begin by asking what the creator means with their creation and proceed to wonder what the creation say about the creator. And that encompasses the interpreter as well. A perfect work of art to illustrate this.
When I tell you I choked on my own saliva when I saw this title,
This channel has some very interesting content, thankyou for sharing 😭😭
bruh i also choked on my own saliva but not because of anything
Some thoughts that come to mind as i look at this painting: The mind of the artist is the god of its creation. Adam was created by God through the mind of Michelangelo. The artist brings his imagination to life. God is an artist and Adam is his masterpiece.
Absolutely the best interpretation I have read thus far! Kudos!
that interpretation you provided is so refreshing and I can't believe I hadn't thought of it
Watching this, I sort of came up with my own interpretation, where the figure on the left is actually God, and the figures on the right are Adam and Eve and their descendants.
Yes and they could be reaching out for god to seek his forgiveness years after committing the sin but God isn't willing to forgive so he's holding back and looks unbothered
@@rishitamalhotra7564 I thought of it as God doesn't need to save humanity, but chooses to save out of compassion. Man on the other hands, needs salvation, and hence is trying their best to touch God, similar to the story of the woman who was healed by just touching Jesus.
But of course this isn't a mainstream interpretation, and it's probably wrong.
that’s a really good interpretation
As a devout Christian/Catholic, Michelangelo probably wouldn't flip the role of the creator and created, but it's an interesting twist.
God the Father, in the Judeo-Christian tradition, is a pure spirit, without a physical body. So the standard Christian understanding of humans, being "made in the image of God" is chiefly in human's soul/spirit, not so much the physicality like shape, size or color. God endowed human beings above all other animals with rational eternal souls, similar to His own.
The two most important powers of this "spiritual/soul image" that humans get from God is the will and the intellect. Free will to choose love and intellect to know. A human being who know and love God, a human being who know and love his neighbors, fulfill the very purpose of which he was created for.
The Judeo-Christian anthropology transcends race, genders, social-economic status of human beings. It gives humans inherent dignity, value and rights simply because he/she is God's most beloved creations, carrying God's very soul. This world view is beautiful and good for human flourishing.
Totus tuus
How do you know he was devout? Was Da Vinci pious? I've long since believed that Da Vinci at least was something of a Deist. Like our founding fathers who believed in a "creator" and a higher power but conspicuously excluded Jesus or Christ or Chirch or even God from our most important contributions to Westetn Civ: Dec of indy and Constitution
@@burtan2000 I don't know actually. Only God can read hearts. His arts are heavily Catholic. Last supper, pieta, Sistine chapel,...I assumed one gotta be into the object of one's art to spend that time and effort perfecting it.
@@burtan2000 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
God was on the founders' mind for sure. The Creator gave these rights. Government is supposed to protect these rights.
Life, liberty and happiness are all central motives of Catholicism.
@Andrew not aware of such myths. Pretty sure the God of Judaism is a pure spirit. Do tell.
Well said
As a catholic I'll have to disagree with this interpratation hahaha
Though the interpratation of a man creating a painting which represents the creation of himself, created by God, brings my attention. Once I heard a thought of Tolkien, I don't remember how it exactly went, but was in the lines of: if we were created by a creator God, by his own image, then we would be creators as well, in the sense of creating art. And being an aspiring artist this motivates me so much, knowing that making art is an aspect of Our Lord we all carry.
Oh I absolutely love it! Now I'm disappointed for not having thought of that before!
I love the idea that a god creating a being in its image makes this being a creator. And which of these beings are the ultimate creators if not artists?
Brilliant! Thanks for the input!
I hope you are doing well, friends 🥰. I invite you to worship our creator and to see the evidence of his existence.
In his book, the holy Quran, more than 1400 years ago:
scientific miracles (expansion of the universe, the chemical composition of humans, the front of the head function, the mountains functions as pegs, factor determines Gender, and etc.….), historical miracles, metaphysical miracles, numerical miracles, linguistic miracles, arrangement miracles, the unmet challenge of bringing something like it, the preservation miracle, and others.
The prophet of Islam, Muhammed (may blessing and mercy of God be upon him) miracles:
the prophecies of his advent in the Bible and the Torah, the historical miracles performed by him that we knew by narrators, the scientific miracles In his sayings, the metaphysical miracles and knowing some things in the future by the knowledge of the creator, and others.
Logical proofs:
Religious comparisons, Issues in the religions except Islam, The superiority of Islam over other religions to guarantee rights and the survival of life, the innate of worshiping a god (mentioned in the Quran), the illiteracy of the prophet of Islam and the Benefits of saying that this Qur’an is from him, the perfection of our creation (mentioned in the Quran), and others.
for further information, don’t hesitate to ask me. Watch these two videos prospectively, please.
ua-cam.com/video/VwZwczHLAL4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/BOoMxN8Qbm0/v-deo.html
this is the most essential website for illustrating the evidence.
www.islamreligion.com/en/articles
thanks...
I know this video is over a year old, but thank you! It made me realise that my interest in theology and creativity culminates in an interest in simply art. Amazing content!
Wow. This video ignited me more than I thought it’d.
It was kinda deep, and you’re right there. Humans have been divinising everything they don’t understand. By this, we create our own gods.
As myself being a Christian I have to say that though I disagree it still is a very interesting thought that I am a little suprised by(not rly bc I've heard of this idea bf) but I did like when you said that it can impact even people outside the Christian world and that hypothesis can rise from this work. Though in Christian theology God doesn't have gender nor a skin color when talking about the Father I found your idea interesting about what you said.
Though Adam probably would've been a tanned person that God in a more "accurate" work would be tanned also since they are in the middle east where the people lived back then or Africa rather somewhat. I respect the fact that people might disagree with me but I either way enjoyed the video though it didn't convince me.
Love your work man and have an awsome day everyone.
This is so cringe, every culture in the World, was depicted in a way that make them look like them this was in 15-16th century italy the christian god become the european god for example african countries can depict god as black if they want because they were also cristians, Just like europe can depict god as european
@@francoisdaureville323 Yes I know, how is this cringe. They can but it's just not accurate to the biblical narrative that's all.
its amazing how a video about a new interpretation would have so many comments with all kinds of other interesting interpretations of the painting
Well that was thought provoking and fun! As a Christian in the 21rst century, I think an argument could be made that both interpretations can be true, that neither interpretation cancels the other out. After all, it should go without saying that what we ultimately believe about God unavoidably reveals what we believe about ourselves. Thanks for the insights, they are genuinely helpful.
There are so many Christians in these comments being very narrow-minded about the second interpretation, as if the very idea and thought exercise is harmful in some way. It's refreshing to see someone who is secure enough in their faith to explore the idea. I agree with you, both interpretations can be true at the same time, a kind of symbiotic relationship between God and humanity. The point of presenting two different readings isn't to disprove one or the other, but rather to show that each view can reveal different ideas.
GODLIKE THUMBNAIL TEXT. Got me really seeing a new perspective through that short sentenced.
About the “god was the creation” interpretation, I noticed something:
Say you just completed an art piece, just like Michelangelo. When you’re done, what do you do? You step back, look up at it, and relax for a moment, happy that the work is done, exactly like what Adam is doing in the painting.
Idk probably just me looking to deep but still it’s interesting to me how it aligns
This is wonderful. I love a secular look at this painting. Honestly I find the secular interpretation more moving and rich in meaning than any ecclesiastical approach.
probably because you don't believe it, and if that's the case then of course you do.
@@Ex_Nihilo777 Maybe you’re the one with belief problems.
"So it is written: “The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit." 1 Corinthians 15:45
Please go in sequence to understand Creation of Man...
*YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THIS UNTILL YOU ARRANGE VERSES IN CORONOLOGY*
The Point is
*How Angels know man or dominant or successor, will spread mischief Corruption and bloodshed?*
How Angles know of Blo od 2;30?
Angles don't have blo od in their body.....
This clearly means
There were creatures that had Blo od before humans and that use to fight, create mischief and corruption.
Blo od means ???
Before man there was dinosaurs with blood that use to fight to control territory and fight of resources of territory
SO CLEAR
SO EVIDENT..
It means Man is built basically to fight and control all resources for himself.
But education taught by God or Religion makes him Civilized, Sacrificing, Loving and Caring.
Please go from Big Bang 2;117 / to 9 billion years of process to Creation of Earth 41;11 / 21;30
Decisions to create earth or process of creation of earth after Big Bang 79;29
Make up of Earth and creation of life with blood, on earth 2:29
*Check first sending of Iron the important constitution of Blood 57;25*
No Iron No Blood
*Then sending of water by meteoroids 78; 14 to first sea and first microbial life / 29;19-20
Botanical Big bang 78;16 / 19;31 and Creation of Oxygen to help warm blooded animals 79;33
The Panspermia and evolution in 3 dark periods (unknown to man/science) 39;6 and
Then Creation of dirty stinking black mud from dying or Corpus of animal life 55;14
No black Mud or Teen No Humans…
*After creation of Black Mud 7;12 38;76 / 15;33 Decision of Creation of man 2;30 and
*Still Humans was not named Insaan or Basher 2;30 but dominant*
*Creation of Souls of man or pre humans first and called first time Insaan 33;72*
Then loading of all soul or all pre humans, in black mud and giving life to first man Adam and taking oath 7:172.
Then creation of Adam from black mud 55;14 and educating Adam 2;31 / 7;11 (still not Hawa AS)
They Adam show his education and Prostration and Creation of Satan 2;34 / 7;12
Creation of Satan 15;31 / 17;61 / 20;116 / 38;74
Then creation of Hawa AS and advised to live “”both of you”” in heaven 2;35 / 7;19 / 20;117
Then they ate the tree and sent down on earth temporarily 2;38 / 7;24 / 20;123
Then Humans started life on earth as short period 2;36 / 7;24 and as test 67;2 / 11;7 / 6;165.
Wow I’ve never thought of this painting as Adam creating “God” but now it makes so much sense. With the idea of God being in the brain and almost a thought of Adam, I’m interpreting this picture as Adam reaching for a perfect ideal version of himself, his highest self, and that is the idea of God. It’s above him, just out of reach, and you can tell Adam doesn’t have full faith in himself, which is why he’s lazily reaching out. But God has full faith in him, which is why He’s reaching out so confidently and erect. I think it’s perfectly fitting of what we as humans deal with when we’re trying to become better people and a better version of ourselves. All the doubt that we deal with chasing our “highest” aspirations.
Amazing! This channel is amazing!Just earned a new subscriber! Thank you!
Just goes to show that believing and loving something you’ve created is a special ability we possess as humans. I think it’s beautiful.
What a wonderful way to put it, the thing that always struck me the most was the care and tenderness in the hands reaching out
This was definitely a very interesting interpretation. I've never sat down to intently think about any religious art works, so this was a full exercise 😅
This was fascinating!! I’ve been on a “painting interpretation/explanation videos” binge recently, and the videos on religious paintings are by far my favorite. (I.e. this video and another video on the fallen angel portrait.)
the channel is one of the most beautiful i have come across
I love this new perspective a lot. It totally makes sense.
I love your page dear one. I've been binge watching your videos since yesterday. Your intriguing narration has my mind in such a beautiful creative place. Looking at art as you talk has been like watching a great film. Continue to create content beautiful soul. 💖💖💖💖💖
You mentioned, that the red bubble that surrounds God and the angels, might be the representation of a brain.
But I think, there is another way to look at it. That red bubble, might also represent a womb, supporting the idea, that Adam created God, even more.
So, the red bubble is a brain on one hand, implicating, that Adam imagined a God, and on the other hand, also a womb, implicating, that through Adam's imagination of God, God was created.
Tips fedora
I love this interpretation
@@biosavat9475 Thank you :D
Or God is in the brain/womb because it's a representation of God creating everything.
Adam doesn't have a womb...
this was the best video i have ever watched about art!!! thank you so much for doing this! as most of the young people, i have attention issues as well but i didnt get bored listening you for a second and didnt close the video in the middle of it! thanks again, keep up the good work
Id even take it a step further, because we don't know what the "real" Adam would have looked like-- this Adam and this God are both being created in Michaelangelo's image.
It's not the wrong image. You can even hear the illuminated sing to Adam now and the "event" is coming.
Adam was code for "atom", the atomic structure in the center of our galaxy
@@deathbydeviceable wait what i never heard that
@@24muneca3
"I was just an only child of the universe
And then I found you, and then I found you
You are the sun and I am just the planets
Spinning around you, spinning around you"
"I am a collapsing star with tunnel vision
But only for you, but only for you
My head is stripped, just like a screw that's been tightened too many times
When I think of you, when I think of you"
ua-cam.com/video/7YAAyUFL1GQ/v-deo.html
@@deathbydeviceable thank you I had never heard it and it's nice
Amazing. I have always kept a distance from this painting because of my beliefs. I thought that nobody would interpret it as I did just because of the symbolism of the piece (yes, I'm that egocentric, lol). But today I decided to look it up. To me, the meaning of the painting has always been the latter. How else could we explain the strong connection to the thought that God is only in our minds? Those angels surrounding him could be those pushing religion as an agenda, in very simple terms. It's truely comforting when I find my observations to be on the right path. I think I'm going to like this channel.
Hi, when you talked about that 2nd modern idea of comprehension of "THe creation of Adam" I got an illumination. AND THIS 2ND IDEA SEEMS TOTALLY CORRECT to me. As a non christian man (in my opinion) this could be totally possible because in the religion is said that God created us, but as WE created the religion, soWE CREATED GOD TO OUR IMAGE as you indirectly said. Man I love your videos and your ideas, keep working as good as you are doing.
Interesting, plausible, thought provoking. Thank you.
This essay reminds me a lot of my favourite part of Dan Simmons' Hyperion, in which he reinterprets the myth of Abraham as Abraham testing God as much as the other way around. İt made a huge impression on me when I first read it.*
*Spoiler alert but it goes like this:
Abraham fully commits to killing his son because if God intervenes then He is a God of love and therefore worthy of Abraham's affection. İf God doesn't intervene then He isn't a God of love and thus is undeserving of worship.
One of the best UA-cam videos I’ve ever seen
Also, may I add that the figures with God almost looked like they were supporting him, almost looked like they were holding him up. Why would a supremely powerful being require support?
Dude i am a scientist. Im not an artist or havent studied art, or nothing like that.
There are thousands, tens of thousands of science channels on YT.
But your's, about art and not science, is my favourite channel in the whole platform.
Your content is just so great. DONT STOP !
I always thought that it was Adam, not God, who looked more comfortable in the painting. God, to me, is the one struggling to reach Adam, almost scaping from the creatures around him, and extending his finger, similar to the gesture of a newborn baby who reaches to the warm of their parents, to touch the slightly open hand of Adam, which appears more dominant. It´s also Adam´s hand position the element that strikes to me the most in this analysis, since although God is indeed a little bit more elevated in the painting, it is Adam´s hand, in contrast to his position, the one slightly upwards, dominanting God´s hand.
But hey, I agree that this is a much more modern take on the painting, but I still appreciate the new perspective. Thanks!
Wrong God is being active and standing above Adam while Adam is being passive to attached to the material desires and to the earth to reach God
I proposed this same idea to my professor and she loved it didn’t think someone made a video about this, great fkn vid my boy
The positions of their fingers give me the feeling that God is active, pointing towards Adam to give him life, while Adam's hand is passive, receiving it.
The words at (4:30) are from Michelangelo??? Where did he write it? Is it a book?
Sorry for the confusion!! Those words are completely from me. I was just giving visual support to what I was saying. :)
I wonder if Adam ever see satan or lucifer I think he would beat them like here's my theory that if god sends Adam to defeat lucifer as he once said he was created in he's own image so imagine that satan attacked and Adam sees the attacked and reflects it back like ur fighting ur own self so when Adam sees it he though it is he's own image trying to do the same thing back to it
i love this channel, i dont come here a lot but everytime i do its always a great experience, unfortunately for you i have adhd and hyperfixate on random things quickly, that being said keep up the good work
I've always been taken with this line of thought from Alfred North Whitehead:
"It is as true to say that God is permanent and the World fluent, as that the World is permanent and God is fluent.
"It is as true to say that God is one and the World many, as that the World is one and God many.
"It is as true to say that, in comparison with the World, God is actual eminently, as that, in comparison with God, the World is actual eminently.
"It is as true to say that the World is immanent in God, as that God is immanent in the World.
"It is as true to say that God transcends the World, as that the World transcends God.
"It is as true to say that God creates the World, as that the World creates God.
I am so glad this video was recommended! While listening I scrolled through your videos and I cannot wait to binge watch them!
Where do you find all these paintings reproduction in such high quality?
Wikicommons
Absolutely
Oh ininow You find them in vaciant city it's they smallest city in the workd
google has a database with high res copys of a ton of artists, at least the famous ones. i think its called scholar something
Dascinating take on this. Really some food for thought.
Absolutely stunning. I want to get this as a tattoo, but I very much disagree with religion and the church. However, I love renaissance paintings and the thought of God being in a human brain, which the church very much disagrees with, makes me want it even more now. Thank you for this wonderful insight.
To think people would go so far as to think that God only exists in our solely in our heads, He is so far beyond our level of understanding, he truly is our omnipotent creator, the father of all things, May all glory come to Christ, the king of all kings
@@gabethenutpalma6033 If the Creator is so far beyond our understanding, who are you to insist so fervently that your interpretation of him is correct? Even if we assume that our universe MUST have been created by some kind of sentient being, there are thousands of other religions. What makes yours more correct? And what about all the dead religions which are no longer worshipped? They all believed just as fervently as you do in their own religions, that their Gods were real and the world would be destroyed if they stopped believing. And nothing happened! So what are Christianity's odds? And how do we even know any Earthly religion describes the true god? I won't believe a thing without proof.
@@saucevc8353 i wouldnt even need proof dude, I just wish he'd give us SOMETHING. It really feels like the universe has equal good and bad, without a great benevolent deity in the sky watching over us. Yin yang style. That's why I'm agnostic
@@okuyasuniijimura it's intrinsic properties of matter more specifically atoms to become an octet (stable form). I think that why we see opposing elements to everything, cause neutral can't be made without a "positive" and "negative".
@@okuyasuniijimura but the universe doesn't work under stability. Since you are not completely religious I assume that you belive in the big bang theory. When the universe was created there were an equal amount of matter and anti matter, they were formed in pairs. Matter and anti matter when together annihilate each other to leave only the purest of energy. If that was the case our universe would have been just energy. But every one in billion chances matter would survive the annilation and that matter is what that made our current universe. We seen bodies made of matter but not anti matter. The amount of anti matter is very low compared to matter in our universe. If everything was truly stable, nothing would've existed.
i've always thought that Adam is chilling, just there, not making effort to reach out. god, on the other hand, is fierce for the touch. Adam's relaxed posture always made me think that the holy being wasn't god, but Adam's life itself
here after Gotg 3
Thank you...
I have this painting on my wall in the Family/ Living Room. I've been fascinated with Michelangelo as long as I've been fascinated with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart ❤
Just found your channel and am loving and learning so much from every video so far, keep up the amazing work!
another way to look at it a bit egocentrically is that the red drapes represent a womb and humans can create another human making them a god in some sense
I think another interesting way of looking at the 2 men in the painting would be not as separate people but rather as one person at different times/ages. The youthful Adam looks as though he is "limp" yet he has all the optimal physical attributes of a strong young man, meaning he has all the tools to be active, make use of his gifts and shape his future, yet for what reason? The reason may be the life he sees ahead of himself as now an older man but with a beautiful woman surrounded by many (possibly his own) children, which would fit into the traditional idea of the masculine dream. While he may feel tired to work towards this dream and can only reach out with seemingly low effort, his future is reaching for him in an active or, as used in this video, "dynamic" manner since it is what he(a man) is destined to become. To me this idea is plausible and at the least consistent in itself in addition to fitting into the idea of the masculine journey in both modern and ancient times. As a final note: What is there to "create" other than your very own future?
Very interesting how anatomy and dissection as first occurred during around 14th and became a normality by the 16th century in the study anatomy. "The creation of adam" really captures this with its attempts at anatomical preciseness of the figures and the "brain" behind god. Great vid!
Great video brother
Of course the real question must be who created the ground that Adam lay on?
I loved the tittle, attractive, with a good Question! I never saw your channel before, but your thinking ability is truly outstanding.
Did god make man, or did man make god
Fascinating perspective.
It may come as a weak point of view, but I think it's possible he intended both interpretations. Even though the Renaissance had a strong Catholic presence, they still had a Roman (and therefore Greek) influence.
Religious syncretism, especially in those days was something that was surely discusses at length. When the wine was flowing and Michelangelo and his friends were discussing art, poetry, philosophy and more, it's easy to see him coming to the conclusion that religion may be a creation of man.
Does that mean it's blasphemy? Of course not. If an omnipotent God exists, there's no way he would be offended by mortal musings.
Does that mean Michelangelo was a secret atheist? No. I'm sure he intended the painting to represent strongly both views. That's the tension that has kept this fresco as iconic as it is. It plays both sides. It seems unfair, and to the western mindset it surely is. But that's what makes it interesting.
You are projecting her e. Not only were atheist close to unheard of during these times {desist thinking was far more common} but there is no real reason for us to think that they weren't Christian. Vast majority of Greco-Roman thought wasn't atheist. It mostly talked about the divine
I really enjoy this type of thought exercise. Expanding our vision can lead to expanding our knowledge
I love the west world interpretation of this piece- representing consciousness
What's the east world interpretation then
@@24muneca3 westworld* the HBO series that heavily revolves around the question of what is consciousness
@@A-G-A-G that's just the people in control manipulating with fancy words... I believe the mind is conscious which is what humans always knew before all this mind trick mind control going on in today's world
@@24muneca3 wtf are you on about.
What a fascinating interpretation! At first I was quite surprised by the thumbnail of the video which says “what if God is the creation of Adam” however, as I continue to watch, it surely does make sense of how God can or possibly be the creation of Adam. Especially, at the latter part of the video.
I love the ideas presented, but it simply cannot be the case that Adam is creating God, since God is the active one, as you yourself pointed out.
I was just there. Wish I had seen this video before going. What an interesting take on it.
My mind has been absolutly obliterated, and pieced back together after this explanation. Subbed, and looking forward to more content! 🖌
nicely explained!
I want to learn more
The thumbnail: "Atheism 101"
Hahaha I might have to change the thumbnail then! The goal of this video is not to refute the existence of a god, but to show the wide range of possible interpretations (even opposite ones) that a masterpiece such as this one can inspire.
@@TheCanvasArtHistory Ah, yes, it is after all only in the form of the question, the _exploration_ of the matter of a god's existence, or at least what Michelangelo's work can suggest about it, being the point central to the video.
I like the second interpretation. Makes a lot of sense and a different aspect to consider.
Did anyone see the arm that’s under Adam ??
O shit👁️👁️
Thought provoking interpretation. Thank you.
Late but I think this perspective is interesting even if you don’t take it as “humanity made up religion”. Faith is by nature believing in something without concrete proof and our minds fill in the infinite gap. It’s all about perspective on how we perceive God
I agree, fantastic comment
so glad i found this channel.
I will say, the use of the word “myth” can be offensive due to the fact that the word itself means false or untrue whereas those stories to many are truth.
The word carried connotations of something being untrue or at the very least and exaggeration of truth but I don't think the base word actually means that. Mythology without those connotations simply refers to the shared religious storyline of a culture or multiple cultures.
When i asked the question on the thumbnail to my Christian friend a few months ago, they got all offended and blasted at me for not believing in the absolute truth
the answer is obvious: they're sheep and their ego gets the better of them.
Dude this whole thing is a thought experiment, but also is blasphemous, which is the most unforgivable sin. No shit he responded that way.
Chills.
God looking at this video🤨
Tittle got me hooked.
You are doing God's work guys!!! Keep it up and thank you for your devotion
You're not doing God's work if you're trying to manipulate his word to fit your worldly view
@@anonspectre1796 you could say the same about religion lmao
@@v0canon no religion doesn't twist anything... religious PEOPLE manipulate God's word
Back when I was young and "Total Recall" came out, I was frustrated with the end because, though it suggested that the whole story might have happened in the mind of the protagonist, it didn't state it explicitly. It was only when I was older (having forgotten the movie entirely for years) that I realized this ambiguity was entirely purposeful, and by far a better ending, and meaning, than one or the other decisive answer. The same is true for Inception, where the ambiguity of the ending is the point.
I think here with the Chapel, it's interesting that God and Adam are situated dead center. The progress in theory begins on one end and centers on the creation of Adam, but looking at it differently, it becomes a mandala, where the creation of God progresses backward in time, radiating out from the center. This is the nature of thought and memory, which generates from the ever-shifting now, both forward as planning and conjecture, and backward as memory. Memory, if you will, is our time travel, showing us the shape of that which no longer exists, and perhaps never existed.
Even from a non-religious point of view, the creation of God could also be seen as the creation of man. Arguably, humanity is defined by our quest to understand the universe and what makes it tick. This quest ultimately becomes cyclical, bringing us back to ourselves, like a mobius strip or a mandala, radiating out from the self into the past, the future, and throughout the universe as we perceive it, and then back to our own brain, which is all we have to understand any of it. It's all happening in there, after all.
And yet, the most comforting notion in the world, at least to me, is that when my brain stops working and turns to worm food, the universe, or God, if you will, goes on. If there is such a thing as immortality, it exists in the entirely conjectural place where the self and the universe cross over, right there in the center of the image. The place where Humanity creates God, while at the same instant, God creates humanity. The mystery of existence, if there is such a thing, that both are happening at the same time, at all times.
Or maybe I'm reading way to much into it.
Beautiful interpretation. It could continue on and on and you just start looking at the image from a completely different perspective!! Cheers for that
liked this piece so much i had a custom ring made showing the creation of adam
First, I don't agree with making any carving or image representing anything in heaven or not in heaven. Because 1) God says not to do it 2) It makes people interpret it as a reflection of THE truth.
An example is this picture, where many philosophers and scholars had tried to analyze this depiction of God (which is untrue) and make assumptions about who God is and what He is as if this is an irrefutable picture of God that exactly depicts God and all that He is.
As is mentioned in this video, this is a modern way of thinking about how maybe God is an idea we came up with at some point in time and Michelangelo didn't hold this view. This is just a great painting he did, inspired by something he deeply believed in and wanted to depict. (Again, I disagree with doing so and God also specifically commands not to do so.)
Michelangelo was a known pagan and hid little nods toward the Christians saying "this is what I think of your faith." So, God being Adam's creation is an interesting interpretation that could very well be correct.
i am speechless this video was insane bro
I also saw the drapery as anatomical, but I saw it as representing the heart, god being in the heart of humanity, which could align with the first interpretation. I love the way this painting show multiple meanings, even if unintended, that applies especially with what we now know
I love the way you thought about this!
This video was 🔥
Very thought provoking 🎯
This literally blew my mind