I know your being funny, but I liked his sincere hope that once the brutality, cruelty, and despair of war could be recorded through audio and video and witnessed firsthand it would either be enough to deter a person or at least know that they're a psychopath.
Love how every depiction of the future just says more about the time it was predicted than anything. It's usually always "like our time, except now flying cars".
@@KCJbomberFTWfiction inspiring reality is shockingly common. The amount of technology that we have that some engineer found in a sci fi book and decided we needed that tech is worth giving a Google
@@anselpeneloperainblossom-s3489 yeah but less so in terms of modern architecture I’d love for a planned skyscraper or museum design from the 1920s to be built today
You could buy firearms without a license in France and many other European countries like Sweden and Germany until about shortly after WWI and there were no restrictions on carrying, so yes, not carrying a weapon seemed a bit strange to most people in 1771.
@@mikejones7593 Good point. But I feel like we're at a loss for not carrying blades normally anymore. If we are worried about untrustworthy people carrying weapons, that's even more reason for normal people to. I guess that applies to guns but blades deserve their place
@@PrinceArthur636 If everyone has weapons, some may be more eager to use them than others. It's best we didn't empower ourselves with tools for murder. A fight in fists is easily preventable. A fight with weapons? That's something you can't interfere with without risking your own life in.
Now knives are making a widespread comeback in European cities because immigrant gangs carry blades and lots of people also carry them for protection...
Our ideas of a distant future conjure up visions of massive technological change, whereas this 1771 author’s ideas of the distant future center around societal perfection.
its ironic too that in order to acheive this eden like society where each person is oriented to the good of all requires a level of unity and compliance that could only be acheived by the complete suppression of all other ideas and a mechanism of state that system of either rewards those those who comply and punishes those who wont until they do and therefore by necessity it would have to be incredibly tyrannical and oppressive.
@@brianschmidt9919 I have to agree with your statement. This is pure socialism and suppression. The biblical heaven could be something like this, and I’m not interested.
@@EmilyTienne well it is our thing after all. Humanity has the ability to manipulate and craft the world to her image like no other animal (that we know of) does.
It's actually impossible to think how the world will be different 1000 years from now. As 1000 years ago we would never even be able to think of such a concept as a phone or laptop.
Anytime someone wants to criticize the founders of the USA, consider the concepts here: the attempt at democracy, freedom of speech, egalitarianism, and how horrific some of this author's fantasies are in proposed practice.
This is the best recommendation the UA-cam algorithm has ever sent me. I usually find this quality of stuff by looking for a topic and searching until i find something good. This was my first recommendation today.
This man had really peculiar viewpoint: the american and african colonies were abolished and the slaves freed themselves while colonizers begged for forgiveness. However, people in China were made to learn latin alphabet, Poles were thanking Tsar Katherine for 'taking care of Polish chaos' and Scotts and Irishmen were eager to be stripped out of their national identity.
Well, the idea was that freedom only extened to a point that education was supposed to correct. Everyone in his society would think the "correct" way... but. there's a big difference between "wrongheadedness" and the absurd suffering of slavery. He wasn't _that_ heartless.
with respect to the chinese using the latin alphabet, I feel as if he was saying they willfully adapted the use of the latin alphabet because it was "better", no force involved. Just the authors personal view that everyone in the world would of course eventually use the latin alphabet.
@@dannydetonator The more DMT we release while dreaming, the more intense, realistic and visionary the dreams become. External DMT like from the usage of Ayahuasca forces it, but such dreams can also come incidental without psychoactive drugs. Also related: Archetypal dreams.
@@Jakob.Hamburg just one hour ago I finished rewatching Inception and wonder if there are actual drugs/ sedatives out there that can enhance lucid dreaming...then I see this comment.
I like how the idea of a car or modern transportation was so foreign to people in the past that it wasn’t even something they thought of in fiction. Like the idea wasn’t even conceivable and was beyond imagination. makes you think unimaginable things will take over the world in the next 500 + years that we now can’t even think of.
@@MercedesxooI just looked it up bro… most of his flying inventory was man powered. Most wouldn’t work or would be very dangerous. However it is believed his parachute and hand glider could of actually worked
I just discovered this channel through watching this video and I completely agree. Just scrolling through some of the video titles tells me I’m definitely going to love this channel!
This (the book) despite being very clearly intended to be read as an utopia of sorts, and thus being presented with very positive lens, has the feeling of having something very fundamentally wrong underneath the appearances. Although admittedly that is probably a result of how naively it presents the ideas.
No, it really is messed up because this society requires most of humanity to get rid of personal desires and come together unanimously under a strict set of ideologies.
It's dehumanizing and like someone else commented there is an uncanny valley effect occurring because people intuitively know humans are not inherently paragons of virtue and selflessness. For a society akin to those portrayed in this novel to exist humans would have to become something different all together.
@@GearZNet Yea and in this alternate universe you see nothing but homogenous cultures, societies. It feels written from a very elitist, pretty racist perspective. What I really like is that our visceral reactions just speak to how human ideas facilitate our material conditions and our material conditions effect our ideas. No matter what we are slaves to our environment and varying utopian fictions are only a result.
I love how these old-timey 'utopian' societies all rely entirely on _everyone_ suddenly and unanimously agreeing with the author on everything and acting entirely selflessly all the time.
True, it's almost as if everyone acted selflessly no one would even need to be selfish. These authors may be idealistic but at least they're capable of being optimistic enough to see the good in humanity
@@l-e-v-117 its almost as if such an idea goes against human nature and not just the "bad" parts, and necessitates cruel and total control over people's lives and the most pervasive propaganda you can imagine
@@theblingcycle these autors where gnostics, they believe in this obscure religion that dictates that a "gnosis" (knowledge) can elevate the soul and "unlock" your potential, essentially making you a god. It's the same seed that drives communism, that being: every human is a good person, but capitalism perverse their good nature, in a post-capitalist society everyone will have unlocked their godhood by the means of revolution (the gnosis of commies). They don't accept the idea of the original sin, that we are imperfect by nature, to them Satan was the good guy all along and he wanted to help humanity by giving the Apple to the humans (we have Apple now and they are overpriced products, Satan didn't know shit about technology).
in my humble opinion, i dont think humans will ever be capable of entire selflessness. although we have big developed brains we are still animals at the end of the day, we fight and squabble and we always have
OP, you are right on lol. There is some AU vibe right here too. Isekai = "Sekai" means World, "I" means another/different. Pronounced roughly as Ee-se-kye. A genre where the MC (or others) for some reason dies and their soul and a new body/identity got to live a second life in another world, or got bodily transmigrated while still alive to another world; either by the mistakes or whims of a highest being(s) that controls the world(s), sudden random dimensional glitches/cracks/wormhole, or by forced summoning by the other world's local beings/people with the absolute intent of using the MC/characters as their otherworldly human tools (war, saviour, soulmate, whatever else).
It's wild to me that even in this vision of an enlightened progressive future where a prosperous reborn Aztec empire rules North America and a black Spartacus has brought justice and peace for the descendants of slaves in the new world, the Irish and Polish are still considered incapable of governing themselves lol colonial era European prejudices are truly fascinating
speak for yourself, you've been brainwashed to believe that - this platform is complict in it as is its parent company google and many others as well - dont buy into the lie that says white means weak. i know who i am and no amount of indoctrination could change the faith i have in in my abilities or my peoples. all i have to do is remember the incredible number of advancements and accomplishments that help make our world a better safer healthier more enjoyable place to live and know that they exist because we dreamt of them built them spoke them sung them wrote them wrought them and did them. im incredibly proud and feel fortunate to be part of a such a great strong and capable people and its from them that i rightly source my strength and confidence and so should you
That’s a very interesting and well done video! I’d love to see some analysis of other old Utopian writings, maybe from Sir Thomas More, William Morris, Alexander Bogdanov or Alexander Chapayev.
As a Pennsylvanian, the idea that we are the only colony that survived is *so* funny to me. Not sure a lot of us would want to survive if coffee was banned though!
@mechupaunhuevon7662you're right about the formal definition of the term they happened to use, but I think the broader point they were trying to get at about it actually being a dark and oppressive society still stands
Gentle actual background music, soft voice, great narration stupendous images and Fascinating topic, s use of image. As an art historian now subscribed. Thank you. subscribed.
Every time I open UA-cam and see a Kings and Things upload, I know it's going to be a great evening. I've been hooked since I discovered the rulers of Bavaria series.
Your channel is one of the best of YT, I'm recent follower and I can't express how good this is man. Continue like this, please. Everything is perfect.
One of my favorite Future speculations ever heard, havent finished yet, but enjoying it so much. My favorite part so far is how everyone is still religious, even more so, but a more rational, benevolent type. It is far more interesting than the 20th century staple of "everyone is atheist"
tl;dr - this is just the 18th century equivalent of "everyone is atheist" It makes more sense when you consider that deism (what you're describing) was the equivalent of today's atheism back then and occupied the same niche - an edgy antiestablishment belief adopted by bourgeois people who wanted to express their discontent with the stuffiness and formalism of state religion. The core motivation of deism is stripping religion of frivolous and irrational aspects, and making everything simple and unadorned; its attacks on the church establishment were nothing that low-church Protestants hadn't said about Catholics a century earlier and weren't still saying in the 18th century. Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, deism won out almost everywhere, and now found itself attacked by a newer, younger version of itself which fulfilled that same role in society: atheism.
@lempereurcremeux3493 i guess that is true though. but if i memory serves, his ideas of neo-deism still contain culture and traditions, unlike most other forms of deism and atheism, which is why I find it interesting.
In this fantasy everyone is agnostic, as are the majority of Americans now. I seldom see atheism in science fiction, usually religion isn't mentioned or the characters remain bizarrely and improbably religious, such as star trek.
@user-wi9hv2pb2q wait, theres religion in star trek? im not familar with the show. But what i mean is yes, religion is usuallh ignored. Star Wars, Man After Man, All tomorrows, i cannot think of religion being detailed there, other than a vague, destructive dogma. But I am not too familar with these either ao i could be wrong
The characters in Star Trek do not remain bizarrely and improbably religious. What are you in about? Have you even watched Star Trek? No one is religious in Star Trek. Even the Klingons who appear to be at first actually just engage in a more secular ancestor worship with a bit of mysticism involved. Although they do have a Valhalla like Heaven. Anyway the Humana in Star Trek are not religious and religion, when it is rarely mentioned, is portrayed in a negative light. Like alien fanatics.
Right and the writer doesn’t seem to acknowledge how fucked that is lol. When George Orwell wrote about the memory hole he made it sound like the end of the world when something would be thrown down it.
Very interesting, you can definitely tell that he is imagining a world in which the ideals of the Enlightenment are true but as is inevitably the case, it was impossible for him to predict social and especially technological advances in the future
What he could not favom is that man is not inherently good. There's clear precursors to progressivism in this text. A lack of understanding of what drove history to progress to where it was at that time. Obviously far easier to see in hindsight.
@@mitchellcouchman1444 "Thou who are to bring felicity upon the earth! thou, alas! that I have only in a dream beheld..." It's moreso utopian fiction than speculative, what the writer dreams France will look like in the future.
I sense an opportunity for a book where Mercier finds himself in Paris of the 2020s after his ‘death’ and compares it to his own image of the future to be written…
Tbh, it's actually kinda funny, in a twisted way, given how people love to predict the uncertain future, just to feel as though they'll end up being right by then, and all of a sudden, they get "psych!" by fate itself.
This isn't a utopia. This is a dystopia under a thin veneer of utopia. This actually feels like the 'utopian' upper city in Demolition Man. People are brainwashed into a cult of pacificism and timidness with no freedom of thought. The most obvious cracks in the veneer, for instance, when it is stated that princes who inherently disagree, are punished by experiencing war for there entire lives. That is a worse punishment that being in prison. This society took down the bastille (that actually did take down crimimals) for being unethical but harshly punishes any thought that is out of line.
And of course book-burnings of anything seen as useless, shaming those who think differently and dare to write about it. Sound much like the two political parties of the US and their allies worldwide.
I’m sitting here thinking “dude no one is gonna believe you could make something that could mimic voices and sounds” in that day and age. Then I remember its 2024 and I’m watching this on my phone while I eat an uncrustable
Futurists in the 1700s: "In the future we will be a society of peaceful philosophers" Futurists in the 2000s: "In the grim darkness of the far future there is only war"
@ love that game so much, definitely the closest vibe to the video. But a full on open world explicitly in Paris in this world would be so cool. Did Paris have “Victorian” vibes/architecture at some point? I only think of England when I think Victorian
What is referered to as Poland at 36:20 was in fact Polish-Lithuanian confederation. Calling it Poland is pretty much the same as refering to Great Britain as England. It was pretty democratic, if you're noble, which I guess counts as anarchy for those living in absolute monarchies like Russia or France of 18th century
@@PeterSchmuttermaier We don't know enough about collective happiness to engineer it. Attempts at doing so at the cost of free thought are guaranteed to end in collective misery.
@@PeterSchmuttermaierI mean, in an absolute sense, it's certainly the enemy of agreement and therefore contentment, which is the best anyone can hope for. Problem is forcing people to conform doesn't eliminate free thought, and actually makes their discontent greater.
Yeah, there's some real sci-fi right there. They basically understood what vision and hearing were, so he could imagine a world where they're manipulated, even without industry to help it along.
@@victorpedrosoceolin3919 1927, Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS was the first mainstream movie to use AI as a theme. But there were discussions of the idea of an "automaton" and how to build one, going back to the time of Socrates.
@@DerHammerSpricht well, metropolis was not that long ago, i can totaly see that And the greeks had some forms of automations if i remember, but putting people to do that was cheaper so they never really went on with it I am gonna search the automaton thing, it sounds curious
Dear KAT, Thank you for this well presented piece, it is easy to understand why you chose it. I agree with other posters that the obvious basis for this work was to act as a Socioeconomic commentary on the writers own time. However it must be remember that "Futurism" as a concept did not even exist, nor was "Technology" a living part of that writers daily life. When Mercier published this work the late 1700's the primary form of information storage was The Book, and to understand ALL human knowledge, one man could read all the written material in those books, making a pile about as high as a man. In my life time alone I have seen the emergence of twelve ( 12) invented information storage systems ( and I am sure I am leaving some out that I have forgotten ), as result it has become necessary to create artificial memory-machines just to manage the explosive growth of information and knowledge, and this growth rate continues exponentially. Much like reading a prediction of what the creation of heavier than air machine flight would mean in 100 years per Scientific American circa 1890, there is the incredible failure see the development of thermonuclear destruction, or to understand functioning machines beyond the farthest reaches of their known space. The implication is that even our own "Futurism" of 100 years from today is woefully meager. However the interesting point, is that the futurism of the 1700's and the futurism of 2000's is in the differences of focus. Mercier was interested in exposing how advanced human culture and politics had become, where as ours is always based upon a "technological changes". Perhaps this difference is because ( unforeseen by Mercier ) we experienced the world shaking failures of created "Utopias" in the intervening years, and the terrible price created as a result. We have found out what Mercier did not know, that the enlightenment as he understood it, was not a panacea, and could even create greater horrors then was possible for him to ever imagine in his most unguarded nightmares.
I must say I disagree with your comment about the next 100 years, most is the 1960-1980s radically over estimated technology in the vast Majority of areas, the only really exception is computers but even in those spaces there is the prediction we would have true AI (not what we have today)
Guy travels to 2024 "I see you have orderly traffic, everyone drives on the right. I bet you do not have a nobleman with 6 horse carriage racing recklessly through the city and plowing through people'' A red Ferrari flies into the view, takes out the light pole and crashes into some people. Guy ''Never mind...''
Guy: "This thing can display a moving painting that gives any information? Alright, let's see what's happening to the world." The TV then started broadcasting about Russians bombing Ukraine and threatening the West with nuclear bombs, the US ruled by a senile old man and spends a lot on military stuff, China ruled by communists and more authoritarian than any absolutist kingdoms, brutal cartels fighting in Brazil, then another pride parade event just started in Paris. Guy: "Oh lord, the future is ruled by jesters..."
Guy: "This thing can display a moving painting that gives any information? Alright, let's see what's happening to the world." The TV then started broadcasting about Russians bombing Ukraine and threatening the West with nuclear bombs, the US ruled by a very old man and spends a lot on military stuff, China ruled by communists and more authoritarian than any absolutist kingdoms, brutal cartels fighting in Brazil, then another pride parade event just started in Paris. Guy: "Oh lord, the future is ruled by jesters..."
This is really specific and unrelated to the video topic, but I was really surprised to hear Beethoven’s op.18 no.6 slow movement at 2:40, a piece that I spent countless hours practicing and performing this year. Great find!
It is always amazing that no one in the deep past could envision a dramatically different APPEARING future. The city of Paris looks more ancient Greek than modern. Like this anecdote still has them in petticoats and living in 18th century homes with horse-drawn carriages. It isn't a huge jump to think that mabe the carriages would propel themselves in the future, or that lights would exist that weren't candles but gave off light "in the way of the sun" with no need to change it. How difficult it is to imagine simple trousers and the concept of the "t-shirt" which is absurdly simple. Or communication across the air which would be fantastic, but is not out of the realm of imagination. The ones in the more modern era predict the idea of smartphones, but they still retain bulky batteries and wires. It is interesting to observe the human imagination does not take dramatic risks with predictions.
This mindset reveals a great deal about our current society, and how we fixate on technological progress, as much as it reveals that people throughout history had different priorities.
@@trudieangelica good point. Most likely the people in the late 1700's didn't even have the ability to invision (or even fathom) what we know later on as technology, so they focused on social progress or political matters as the future advancements that would matter most. It's likeif you asked a Neanderthal what the future would be like... they just wouldn't have a clue what was even capable of being created in 100,000 years. He'd probably say "the mammoth will be extinct and all of us will have different kinds of fresh meat and fruit year round, and the wooden shelters we make will be stronger and warmer at night"
Most outlandish part of this future is “no one it above the law” and “2% tax or less with a woolen regularly donating extra to the state”. What a world that would be
Not it isn't. The Time Machine happens in the year 802701 We're still closer to 1895 the year it was published. I don't see why that should surprise us.
The only unrealistic thing about the whole story is that a crowd gathered around when he arrived to the future. Most likely everybody would ignore him as people will be either completely antisocial, or they'll already be used to seeing so much weird stuff that nothing can surprise them anymore.
Very unique and creative vision of the future, charming by its intellectualism, respect for the common human, pastoralism and overall simplicity, even if I'm not a fan of how it glamourizes book burning (almost like he had a dent against non-philosophical litterature, especially romance, so much it's funny, "No fun allowed") or the condescendant view of the author on Scotland and Ireland for daring to exist as their own thing. I find it however deeply interesting in how ahead of the curve in mainstream opinion it was on realizing the cruelty of empires and enslaving people and how it treats with respect and sameness human beings of different parts of the world and their cultures (outside Scotland and Ireland), very rare in the 18th century.
It’s interesting how he got some things at-least partially right. For starters, Slavery Did end, although not in the violent way he predicted. He predicted China and Japan opening their borders, although China is still fairly isolated as of 2024. He predicted the end of Serfdom in Russia, although incredibly early. He predicted the fall of the Ottoman Empire, which was impressive because its decline wouldn’t start for a few decades. He predicted a United Italy, which was impressive because it wasn’t considered until after the Napoleonic War. But most interestingly, he somehow predicted the rise of Atheism. That would’ve been nigh undoable back then, yet he did it.
I swear I love this channel! Every upload is excellent in it's eclectic nature while maintaining the aspects of the historical theme of the channel. Always well done. Also, it's 40 minutes long!!! Perfect for sending me to dreamland
Five centuries earlier Roger Bacon did predict self propelled vehicles and flying machines. Interesting that this Mercier did predict some kind of video display and sound playback kept separately. Or course fossil fuels are finite so by 2440 a lot of products of the industrial age may have been and gone.
Fossil fuels are finite but our ability to produce energy isn't, at least in the same way. And I doubt a futurist writing at the start of the industrial revolution would consider the idea that resources are finite, that has only come to the forefront in the last century or so. Regardless, I don't think industrialism should be considered at all when discussing this book since I don't think the author had any way of considering it when writing it.
I've heard a little bit about this book from Laurent Dubois' "Avengers of the New World," a book about the history of the Haitian Revolution which references and takes its title from that passage about the statue. Interesting to learn more about how Mercier envisioned the future!
There's the story 'A True Story' written by the Syrian author Lucian of Samosata in the second century. Why isn't THAT credited as the first science fiction novel? 🧐
If you’re calling speculative fiction the same as sci fi then there’s the source of the issue. I know they’re linked and held equivalent at times but if you count anything speculative why not count religious prophecy? Revelations and Ragnarok. No, no. Speculative fiction is a good word for this, a term I like is social science fiction. Books that reimagine the social and economic landscapes of the future. The Blazing World is a book written in 1666 by Margaret Cavendish, this too is a work that gives beautiful insights into a future only the past could imagine.
As Apanblod mentioned, the first known piece of literature best fitting the “sci-fi” genre would likely be A True Story by Lucian of Samosata written in the 2nd century AD. Another contender might be Somnium (The Dream) by Johannes Kepler written in 1608. It has been considered to be one of the earliest works of science fiction by people such as Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov.
First encounter with 'Kings and Things'. Brilliantly put together ... nice narration and choice of music ... I'd heard the glass harmonica before but hadn't realised how old it was! Great care taken with choosing paintings and other illustrations - that alone must have taken hours of research, although I was surprised to see the modern Sydney Opera House at 31:14. Congratulations on a very well produced audio-visual that sustained interest over the full forty minutes. R (Australia)
The most interesting part is trying to picture a "futuristic" society that never experienced the industrial revolution. A future, yet religious and agrarian society that is still friendly to monarchy over republicanism.
This is a refreshing and absolutely lovely film, which we are so glad ☺️ that you made. The artistic selections chosen are exquisite and our life is better for having seen them. thank you.
Amazing how much more self aware they were than we give them credit for. It's almost as if we've progressed technologically but regressed intellectually in some aspects.
I would love to see what people 400 years from now will think of our Sci-fi and just how outlandish it was, I can imagine a lot of ridicule around how Star Trek portrays the 2300s - 2400s despite how good it would be.
@@PRH123 Not a chance. Even if our current infrastructure-dependent civilization breaks down, too much is still known. People will still be able to read books, melt scrap metal and glass, draw wire, &c. We will be able to rebuild civilization from almost any imaginable collapse.
@@arcadiaberger9204 think about it, in the 2nd half of the 19th century, long after the industrial revolution had already started, natural resources in many places were laying on the Earth's surface where they could easily obtained, for example the pure copper in northern Michigan, petroleum in Pennsylvania, coal seams near the surface, etc. Those easily accessible resources are gone, most significantly hydrocarbon energy sources that drove the industrial revolution. Those resources are now being sourced from deep under the ocean, or boiled out of oil sands. When humanity is knocked back to the wood and stone age, they won't be able to repeat those steps and easily access those resources again. Not to mention also that the knowledge of how such things are done is in the heads of a very tiny group of people, and each of them is an expert in their narrow field, none is a master of all of them. If those people are knocked off in the descent back to the wood age, the rest of us who can't hardly put together Ikea furniture are not going to be able :)
@@PRH123 If modern civilization collapses, people will make tools out of scrap metal-- there will be unbelievable amounts of it from the ruins of our civilization. While future people probably won't be able to watch old sci fi shows and movies, some sci-fi books will survive. I hope the future society doesn't burn its books for being frivolous entertainment.
Funny how in this type of utopian decriptions (modern and, evidently, older too) the solution to religious intollerance it's always something on the line of "all the people are (more or less explicity) forced to belive the same, simple, things and dissuaded/prohibited to diverge from that". Where it's supposed to be the enlighted tollerance and liberty in that?!
@@DinoCism it's a full on contraddiction. Everyones is religious, but any actual discussion about it is frowned upon and nothing can go beyond simple governament approved beliefs. It looks more the dream of a particulary authoritarian medieval pope that an actual humanist utopia.
@@enriquesanchez2001probably that's what happened, but isn't it a little iphocrytal? "Once my beliefs will be the dominant ones there will be true peace and tolerance". Thats legit how terrorist groups justify they're violence.
I love how 'imaginative' and 'out there' the futurism vision from people back then. Its so refreshing. Its so much better than contemporary era where people's imagination and vision seem to be stuck on old and tired popular scifi tropes, so its either star wars or blade runner.
you could read or watch other things, halo is one of my favorites but none of those you mentioned were meant to envision the actual future as in what it would likely be like, especially star wars isn't even set in the future and certainly does not try to be accurate, neither does blade runner i believe
Watching this again. Great episode and fascinating subject matter. I love to hear what people in the past thought the future would be like. Sometimes they got it almost right. Thumbs up!
So basically this guy goes centuries into the future, and his favorite part was sitting in front of the TV. love it
😂😂
This is the best comment.
I know your being funny, but I liked his sincere hope that once the brutality, cruelty, and despair of war could be recorded through audio and video and witnessed firsthand it would either be enough to deter a person or at least know that they're a psychopath.
Sounds like idiocracy.
@@sforza209 Sounds like what we're all doing right now.
I've never considered a future without the industrial revolution, it's so cool to imagine a distant future like 2440 being so old fashion
It's far enough out for a collapse and reformation. He might not be as off-the-mark as we think, lol.
@@joshmnkytrue omg! i hope so
It’s crazy to think this could’ve happened. Human progress really wasn’t inevitable
@@Valentin-oc5nh u hope women are nothing more than companions for men
@@Valentin-oc5nh you hope for a global societal collapse within the next 300 years?
Love how every depiction of the future just says more about the time it was predicted than anything. It's usually always "like our time, except now flying cars".
I love that the architect of paris was so inspired by this book he did what the book wanted 100 years later building giant avenues
Yea, and sort of universal desires, like being able to fly,
@@KCJbomberFTWfiction inspiring reality is shockingly common. The amount of technology that we have that some engineer found in a sci fi book and decided we needed that tech is worth giving a Google
@@anselpeneloperainblossom-s3489 yeah but less so in terms of modern architecture
I’d love for a planned skyscraper or museum design from the 1920s to be built today
@ metropolitan life North building original design can be completed today if funded
I love the fact that not having a sword when walking down the streets of paris was considered highly futuristic back then.
You could buy firearms without a license in France and many other European countries like Sweden and Germany until about shortly after WWI and there were no restrictions on carrying, so yes, not carrying a weapon seemed a bit strange to most people in 1771.
it still is in UK xd
@@mikejones7593 Good point. But I feel like we're at a loss for not carrying blades normally anymore. If we are worried about untrustworthy people carrying weapons, that's even more reason for normal people to. I guess that applies to guns but blades deserve their place
@@PrinceArthur636 If everyone has weapons, some may be more eager to use them than others. It's best we didn't empower ourselves with tools for murder. A fight in fists is easily preventable. A fight with weapons? That's something you can't interfere with without risking your own life in.
Now knives are making a widespread comeback in European cities because immigrant gangs carry blades and lots of people also carry them for protection...
Our ideas of a distant future conjure up visions of massive technological change, whereas this 1771 author’s ideas of the distant future center around societal perfection.
its ironic too that in order to acheive this eden like society where each person is oriented to the good of all requires a level of unity and compliance that could only be acheived by the complete suppression of all other ideas and a mechanism of state that system of either rewards those those who comply and punishes those who wont until they do and therefore by necessity it would have to be incredibly tyrannical and oppressive.
@@brianschmidt9919 I have to agree with your statement. This is pure socialism and suppression. The biblical heaven could be something like this, and I’m not interested.
It's interesting that we are so technology-leaning on how we imagine the future today. I love the idea of imagining distant future on a moral aspect
@@M.Alfonso Agreed. We, as a whole, have come to tie human worth to the acquisition of substance (money, property, things).
@@EmilyTienne well it is our thing after all. Humanity has the ability to manipulate and craft the world to her image like no other animal (that we know of) does.
It's actually impossible to think how the world will be different 1000 years from now. As 1000 years ago we would never even be able to think of such a concept as a phone or laptop.
Holtzman effect
To think? Or to be right?
1000 years in the future is easy to predict: Richard Nixon will be president
Maybe not. But at least we know what the 41st millennium will be like.
40 years ago few would have been able to conceive a phone or laptop.
The Tower of Babel book burning and the mask of shame re-educators part was terrifying
Its like an 18th century Brave New World with a heaping dose of 1984.
@@wyatttyson7737 Except the person writing it thought it was a good idea.
Leftists do love their book burnings
Anytime someone wants to criticize the founders of the USA, consider the concepts here: the attempt at democracy, freedom of speech, egalitarianism, and how horrific some of this author's fantasies are in proposed practice.
@@user-wi9hv2pb2qand slavery
This is the best recommendation the UA-cam algorithm has ever sent me. I usually find this quality of stuff by looking for a topic and searching until i find something good. This was my first recommendation today.
This man had really peculiar viewpoint: the american and african colonies were abolished and the slaves freed themselves while colonizers begged for forgiveness. However, people in China were made to learn latin alphabet, Poles were thanking Tsar Katherine for 'taking care of Polish chaos' and Scotts and Irishmen were eager to be stripped out of their national identity.
Well, the oppression olympics were somewhat different back then...
He had the best viewpoint
Well, the idea was that freedom only extened to a point that education was supposed to correct. Everyone in his society would think the "correct" way... but. there's a big difference between "wrongheadedness" and the absurd suffering of slavery. He wasn't _that_ heartless.
with respect to the chinese using the latin alphabet, I feel as if he was saying they willfully adapted the use of the latin alphabet because it was "better", no force involved. Just the authors personal view that everyone in the world would of course eventually use the latin alphabet.
to be fair chinese people today use english letters for pinyin in everyday life, it's much faster than having to write out characters
The most unbelievable part of this story was the entire British Isles uniting together as Great Britain.
Yup! The English will never live down what they did to Ireland/Scotland, not in hundred generations
The uk does. Its one island
@@pierren___ But they are only in a sort of mini-union, aren't they?
They're still seperate countries.
@@pierren___ go on over to scotland and call em english, hahahahha
@@Helperbot-2000 no matter how far they twist it, they are
That is one hell of a nap
Reminds me of Ray Wiley Hubbard's Conversation with the devil 😂
He might have taken some.. ahem, dream enchancers like ayhuasca or something before bedtime
my man SNOOZED
@@dannydetonator The more DMT we release while dreaming, the more intense, realistic and visionary the dreams become. External DMT like from the usage of Ayahuasca forces it, but such dreams can also come incidental without psychoactive drugs. Also related: Archetypal dreams.
@@Jakob.Hamburg just one hour ago I finished rewatching Inception and wonder if there are actual drugs/ sedatives out there that can enhance lucid dreaming...then I see this comment.
I like how the idea of a car or modern transportation was so foreign to people in the past that it wasn’t even something they thought of in fiction. Like the idea wasn’t even conceivable and was beyond imagination. makes you think unimaginable things will take over the world in the next 500 + years that we now can’t even think of.
I know and it was SO CLOSE to the Industrial Revolution but not close enough so there’s just more limited technology
What about Leo davinci helicopter origin
@@MercedesxooI don’t believe that would be like a modern day plane or even the first plane wright brothers.
@@MercedesxooI just looked it up bro… most of his flying inventory was man powered. Most wouldn’t work or would be very dangerous. However it is believed his parachute and hand glider could of actually worked
Next 50 years even. Things are going way faster now
One of the best history channels on UA-cam, no contest.
I can think of some
I just discovered this channel through watching this video and I completely agree. Just scrolling through some of the video titles tells me I’m definitely going to love this channel!
This (the book) despite being very clearly intended to be read as an utopia of sorts, and thus being presented with very positive lens, has the feeling of having something very fundamentally wrong underneath the appearances.
Although admittedly that is probably a result of how naively it presents the ideas.
No, it really is messed up because this society requires most of humanity to get rid of personal desires and come together unanimously under a strict set of ideologies.
@@UltrafalconVX7 sounds like modern day liberalism to me lol
It's like an uncanny valley effect applied to the whole world
It's dehumanizing and like someone else commented there is an uncanny valley effect occurring because people intuitively know humans are not inherently paragons of virtue and selflessness. For a society akin to those portrayed in this novel to exist humans would have to become something different all together.
@@GearZNet Yea and in this alternate universe you see nothing but homogenous cultures, societies. It feels written from a very elitist, pretty racist perspective. What I really like is that our visceral reactions just speak to how human ideas facilitate our material conditions and our material conditions effect our ideas. No matter what we are slaves to our environment and varying utopian fictions are only a result.
I like how even an 18th century man recognized that synthesizers were cool
🤘😂
Its interesting that all the buildings have rooftop gardens, a popular future city idea nowadays is rooftop lawns
I love how these old-timey 'utopian' societies all rely entirely on _everyone_ suddenly and unanimously agreeing with the author on everything and acting entirely selflessly all the time.
True, it's almost as if everyone acted selflessly no one would even need to be selfish. These authors may be idealistic but at least they're capable of being optimistic enough to see the good in humanity
@@l-e-v-117 its almost as if such an idea goes against human nature and not just the "bad" parts, and necessitates cruel and total control over people's lives and the most pervasive propaganda you can imagine
@@theblingcycle these autors where gnostics, they believe in this obscure religion that dictates that a "gnosis" (knowledge) can elevate the soul and "unlock" your potential, essentially making you a god. It's the same seed that drives communism, that being: every human is a good person, but capitalism perverse their good nature, in a post-capitalist society everyone will have unlocked their godhood by the means of revolution (the gnosis of commies). They don't accept the idea of the original sin, that we are imperfect by nature, to them Satan was the good guy all along and he wanted to help humanity by giving the Apple to the humans (we have Apple now and they are overpriced products, Satan didn't know shit about technology).
in my humble opinion, i dont think humans will ever be capable of entire selflessness. although we have big developed brains we are still animals at the end of the day, we fight and squabble and we always have
Utopia literally means “no place.”
This is some wacky french isekai
This is literally a isekai!
what is that
@@AmazingRebel23A quick search says it’s Japanese fantasy about a person transported to another world
nahh broo just made a world full of chill folks
OP, you are right on lol. There is some AU vibe right here too.
Isekai = "Sekai" means World, "I" means another/different. Pronounced roughly as Ee-se-kye. A genre where the MC (or others) for some reason dies and their soul and a new body/identity got to live a second life in another world, or got bodily transmigrated while still alive to another world; either by the mistakes or whims of a highest being(s) that controls the world(s), sudden random dimensional glitches/cracks/wormhole, or by forced summoning by the other world's local beings/people with the absolute intent of using the MC/characters as their otherworldly human tools (war, saviour, soulmate, whatever else).
It's wild to me that even in this vision of an enlightened progressive future where a prosperous reborn Aztec empire rules North America and a black Spartacus has brought justice and peace for the descendants of slaves in the new world, the Irish and Polish are still considered incapable of governing themselves lol colonial era European prejudices are truly fascinating
I'm not sure an empire of any kind ruling north america would be progress but sure.
speak for yourself, you've been brainwashed to believe that - this platform is complict in it as is its parent company google and many others as well - dont buy into the lie that says white means weak. i know who i am and no amount of indoctrination could change the faith i have in in my abilities or my peoples. all i have to do is remember the incredible number of advancements and accomplishments that help make our world a better safer healthier more enjoyable place to live and know that they exist because we dreamt of them built them spoke them sung them wrote them wrought them and did them. im incredibly proud and feel fortunate to be part of a such a great strong and capable people and its from them that i rightly source my strength and confidence and so should you
@@Mrpersonman0 i mean is colonialism progression?
@@Mrpersonman0Well, this dude was wishing for an empire in Europe, too. It was certainly his idea of of progress.
@@arlynnecumberbatch1056 by definition, yes.
Can’t wait to see people in 2440 react to this the same way we reacted in 2015 to Back to the Future II
In our next reincarnations hihi...
Plot twist it all comes true!
@@RockBrentwood Sounds like some vaguely Confucian fear-mongering.
> implying there are people in 2440
I'm afraid you'll have to wait.
That’s a very interesting and well done video! I’d love to see some analysis of other old Utopian writings, maybe from Sir Thomas More, William Morris, Alexander Bogdanov or Alexander Chapayev.
How kind of everyone to have carried on with life around him without disturbing him, for the hundreds of years that he slept.
Just like Fry, Buck Rogers an Not Sure
As a Pennsylvanian, the idea that we are the only colony that survived is *so* funny to me. Not sure a lot of us would want to survive if coffee was banned though!
Where did he said that ?
@@pierren___ i was skipping through the video and at number 8 it says that about Pennsylvania soon after
@@RyRy2057 number 8 ?
@@pierren___ oh yeah sorry like, when you hit 8 on the keyboard it skips to 80% through the video
@@RyRy2057 oh yeah i found around 32:00
"Theology? Yeah, we use that as a memetic warfare agent"
Sorry bro I cannot come today, I got sent to the Hell again for developing a warlike disposition.
"Under peaceful conditions, the warlike individual sets upon himself!"
~Friedrich Nietzsche
Bros like, evil people just play COD as punishment.
I hear this part and suddenly goes "oh, you mean All quiet on the Western Front ?"
What's weird you can search it in UA-cam and some people call it relaxing
Once again, every video on this channel just inspires me to create a more beautiful and pleasant world, thank you so very much king
I could easily see how this "utopia" could be twisted into the most depressing dystopia ever imagined... geez what a great concept for a novel.
I agree, the bookburning was what made it click for me that it was a fascist hell.
Mao also burned countless books , is he a Fascist?
@@auangauthentication958 yes
It reminds me of the whole whole thing and self censorship that’s going on now
@mechupaunhuevon7662you're right about the formal definition of the term they happened to use, but I think the broader point they were trying to get at about it actually being a dark and oppressive society still stands
This was extraordinarily well crafted. Bravo! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Gentle actual background music, soft voice, great narration stupendous images and Fascinating topic, s use of image. As an art historian now subscribed. Thank you. subscribed.
"Who's that bald guy?"
"That's Jean Luc. He runs a vineyard outside of town. He's kinda... Weird..."
That's about 420 years from now. Pretty sure it's 100% accurate.
After the nukes go off a few hundred years pass and people forget about the modern times and the industrial revolution 😅...😢 🍻
Every time I open UA-cam and see a Kings and Things upload, I know it's going to be a great evening. I've been hooked since I discovered the rulers of Bavaria series.
Your channel is one of the best of YT, I'm recent follower and I can't express how good this is man. Continue like this, please. Everything is perfect.
Me too and I agree.
Mixture of Utopian and Dystopian ideas wrapped in a retro-futuristic package.
stop defining, just experience it
@@sample455 Stop resisting citizen! Just like... let it happen bro ;)
Predicting the future is a fun exercise, but we are all prisoners of our own time and thoroughly limited. Excellent video. Thank You.
THE 2 MONTH UPLOAD SCHEDULE IS REAAAALLLL
I actually thought I'd be able to get this out by early February at one point ... I never learn, it always takes longer than expected 😑
@@kingsandthingsdon’t stress about it, love the content and if it takes longer to make it so be it
@@kingsandthingsquality over quantity
One of my favorite Future speculations ever heard, havent finished yet, but enjoying it so much. My favorite part so far is how everyone is still religious, even more so, but a more rational, benevolent type. It is far more interesting than the 20th century staple of "everyone is atheist"
tl;dr - this is just the 18th century equivalent of "everyone is atheist"
It makes more sense when you consider that deism (what you're describing) was the equivalent of today's atheism back then and occupied the same niche - an edgy antiestablishment belief adopted by bourgeois people who wanted to express their discontent with the stuffiness and formalism of state religion. The core motivation of deism is stripping religion of frivolous and irrational aspects, and making everything simple and unadorned; its attacks on the church establishment were nothing that low-church Protestants hadn't said about Catholics a century earlier and weren't still saying in the 18th century.
Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, deism won out almost everywhere, and now found itself attacked by a newer, younger version of itself which fulfilled that same role in society: atheism.
@lempereurcremeux3493 i guess that is true though. but if i memory serves, his ideas of neo-deism still contain culture and traditions, unlike most other forms of deism and atheism, which is why I find it interesting.
In this fantasy everyone is agnostic, as are the majority of Americans now.
I seldom see atheism in science fiction, usually religion isn't mentioned or the characters remain bizarrely and improbably religious, such as star trek.
@user-wi9hv2pb2q wait, theres religion in star trek? im not familar with the show. But what i mean is yes, religion is usuallh ignored. Star Wars, Man After Man, All tomorrows, i cannot think of religion being detailed there, other than a vague, destructive dogma. But I am not too familar with these either ao i could be wrong
The characters in Star Trek do not remain bizarrely and improbably religious. What are you in about? Have you even watched Star Trek? No one is religious in Star Trek. Even the Klingons who appear to be at first actually just engage in a more secular ancestor worship with a bit of mysticism involved. Although they do have a Valhalla like Heaven. Anyway the Humana in Star Trek are not religious and religion, when it is rarely mentioned, is portrayed in a negative light. Like alien fanatics.
28:07. I love how you use the image of Abu Simbel. It was the perfect image to show during the narration at that point. Exceptional clip. As always.
The book burning and author censorship via mandatory shame masks was so dark so suddenly 💀
The part its portrayed as a good thing too is interesting, idk if that's the influence of how its presented here or how its presented in the book tho
Poor Sappho was wronged!
@@mitchellcouchman1444Yoooo does anybody else think this guy a shameful fool 😹🫵 I think we all know what time it is fr 👺🫳
Right and the writer doesn’t seem to acknowledge how fucked that is lol. When George Orwell wrote about the memory hole he made it sound like the end of the world when something would be thrown down it.
@@sagitarriulus9773 one person’s utopia is often another person’s dystopia.
Very interesting, you can definitely tell that he is imagining a world in which the ideals of the Enlightenment are true but as is inevitably the case, it was impossible for him to predict social and especially technological advances in the future
What he could not favom is that man is not inherently good. There's clear precursors to progressivism in this text. A lack of understanding of what drove history to progress to where it was at that time. Obviously far easier to see in hindsight.
@@mitchellcouchman1444 yes
He predicted electricity and internet.
He litterally did and thats why he wrote this book. 🤦♂️
@@mitchellcouchman1444 "Thou who are to bring felicity upon the earth! thou, alas! that I have only in a dream beheld..." It's moreso utopian fiction than speculative, what the writer dreams France will look like in the future.
This is a thought-provoking video about a thought-provoking book. Thanks so much for bringing it to my attention!
I sense an opportunity for a book where Mercier finds himself in Paris of the 2020s after his ‘death’ and compares it to his own image of the future to be written…
Go for it! I think there's lots of opportunity for a funny story that reflects our time back to ourselves!
When 1914 began everyone "Thought" the future was so bright, the sky was the limit. Then June 28th happened. You cannot predict history
Tbh, it's actually kinda funny, in a twisted way, given how people love to predict the uncertain future, just to feel as though they'll end up being right by then, and all of a sudden, they get "psych!" by fate itself.
The future was bright. But it only came after 31 long years)
Not quite, optimistic SF remained popular until the 1950's.
This isn't a utopia. This is a dystopia under a thin veneer of utopia. This actually feels like the 'utopian' upper city in Demolition Man. People are brainwashed into a cult of pacificism and timidness with no freedom of thought. The most obvious cracks in the veneer, for instance, when it is stated that princes who inherently disagree, are punished by experiencing war for there entire lives.
That is a worse punishment that being in prison. This society took down the bastille (that actually did take down crimimals) for being unethical but harshly punishes any thought that is out of line.
20:06 Holy shit this is wild. There is no way this guy was trying to make a utopia here.
The book burning part definitely gives it away
one need to think of the context in which its exist, the author already living in dystopia.
And of course book-burnings of anything seen as useless, shaming those who think differently and dare to write about it. Sound much like the two political parties of the US and their allies worldwide.
By your logic then, every society is dystopian as every society has taboos violating which will lead to ostracization and other punishments.
I’m sitting here thinking “dude no one is gonna believe you could make something that could mimic voices and sounds” in that day and age. Then I remember its 2024 and I’m watching this on my phone while I eat an uncrustable
Shows how limited our imaginations are compared to the grand scale of universe and time
The bit about attacking an enemy with religion/theology was pretty great.
Or as we call it today, attacking them with propaganda.
Spore moment.
@@comradecockatoo3558all they’re missing is a giant hologram coming from one of the ships of a pastor reading the city biblical verses
I love your video/editing style, its really peaceful and intriguing to watch
Futurists in the 1700s: "In the future we will be a society of peaceful philosophers"
Futurists in the 2000s: "In the grim darkness of the far future there is only war"
the two world wars, especially the second, gave quite a scar to mankind
@@strogonoffcore Also, relevantly, this book aims to portray a bright hopeful future, whereas the point of Warhammer 40k is exactly the opposite.
@@storotso Also also: you can't really make a table top game based on utopian peace
And neither is correct. Every era comes with its goods and bads. Trying to see the world as either optimistic or pessimistic is naïvity.
The real retro-futurism. haha
necro-futurism
Classical futurism
This would be a dope setting for an open world video game
Tyranny of King Washington?
@@fictionsmith3688ac3?
Lies of P
@ love that game so much, definitely the closest vibe to the video. But a full on open world explicitly in Paris in this world would be so cool. Did Paris have “Victorian” vibes/architecture at some point? I only think of England when I think Victorian
@@fictionsmith3688 is that the AC3 expansion?
That was absolutely amazing, very interesting indeed. Thanks for uploading this!
What is referered to as Poland at 36:20 was in fact Polish-Lithuanian confederation. Calling it Poland is pretty much the same as refering to Great Britain as England. It was pretty democratic, if you're noble, which I guess counts as anarchy for those living in absolute monarchies like Russia or France of 18th century
reffering to the dominant nation of the "union of equals" is a very common practice that tells a lot about the nature of multinational societies.
Did you understood he elogise it ?
Most nobles were left wing progressists in the 18 century
@@pierren___ there was no sutch thing in the 18th century, the term right wing only came to existende in the 19th century
@@theaverageportugues4200 bro never heard about the french revolution .
Ever notice how often utopia is based on everyone agreeing with the utopian? The first casualty of utopia is free thought
Well said.
So do you mean that free thought is the enemy of collective happiness?
@@PeterSchmuttermaier We don't know enough about collective happiness to engineer it. Attempts at doing so at the cost of free thought are guaranteed to end in collective misery.
@@PeterSchmuttermaierI mean, in an absolute sense, it's certainly the enemy of agreement and therefore contentment, which is the best anyone can hope for. Problem is forcing people to conform doesn't eliminate free thought, and actually makes their discontent greater.
A truly free society is a dangerous society. A truly safe society is a controlling society. There's no way of winning
Crazy how he predicted radio and tv
Crazy how long ago people were predicting AI/robots.
@@DerHammerSpricht where, please?
Yeah, there's some real sci-fi right there. They basically understood what vision and hearing were, so he could imagine a world where they're manipulated, even without industry to help it along.
@@victorpedrosoceolin3919 1927, Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS was the first mainstream movie to use AI as a theme. But there were discussions of the idea of an "automaton" and how to build one, going back to the time of Socrates.
@@DerHammerSpricht well, metropolis was not that long ago, i can totaly see that
And the greeks had some forms of automations if i remember, but putting people to do that was cheaper so they never really went on with it
I am gonna search the automaton thing, it sounds curious
12:43 if only seeing videos of battles was enough to convince leaders not to go to war, Mercier would be pretty disappointed in the present
Dear KAT, Thank you for this well presented piece, it is easy to understand why you chose it. I agree with other posters that the obvious basis for this work was to act as a Socioeconomic commentary on the writers own time. However it must be remember that "Futurism" as a concept did not even exist, nor was "Technology" a living part of that writers daily life.
When Mercier published this work the late 1700's the primary form of information storage was The Book, and to understand ALL human knowledge, one man could read all the written material in those books, making a pile about as high as a man. In my life time alone I have seen the emergence of twelve ( 12) invented information storage systems ( and I am sure I am leaving some out that I have forgotten ), as result it has become necessary to create artificial memory-machines just to manage the explosive growth of information and knowledge, and this growth rate continues exponentially.
Much like reading a prediction of what the creation of heavier than air machine flight would mean in 100 years per Scientific American circa 1890, there is the incredible failure see the development of thermonuclear destruction, or to understand functioning machines beyond the farthest reaches of their known space. The implication is that even our own "Futurism" of 100 years from today is woefully meager.
However the interesting point, is that the futurism of the 1700's and the futurism of 2000's is in the differences of focus. Mercier was interested in exposing how advanced human culture and politics had become, where as ours is always based upon a "technological changes". Perhaps this difference is because ( unforeseen by Mercier ) we experienced the world shaking failures of created "Utopias" in the intervening years, and the terrible price created as a result. We have found out what Mercier did not know, that the enlightenment as he understood it, was not a panacea, and could even create greater horrors then was possible for him to ever imagine in his most unguarded nightmares.
I must say I disagree with your comment about the next 100 years, most is the 1960-1980s radically over estimated technology in the vast Majority of areas, the only really exception is computers but even in those spaces there is the prediction we would have true AI (not what we have today)
the glass harmonica sounds so haunting.
Needs a revival.
It's called an "armonica", BTW.
this was the most interesting thing I've seen in awhile, very well made
Guy travels to 2024 "I see you have orderly traffic, everyone drives on the right. I bet you do not have a nobleman with 6 horse carriage racing recklessly through the city and plowing through people''
A red Ferrari flies into the view, takes out the light pole and crashes into some people.
Guy ''Never mind...''
"Unfortunately, I see you still haven't burned all the books yet."
Guy: "This thing can display a moving painting that gives any information? Alright, let's see what's happening to the world."
The TV then started broadcasting about Russians bombing Ukraine and threatening the West with nuclear bombs, the US ruled by a senile old man and spends a lot on military stuff, China ruled by communists and more authoritarian than any absolutist kingdoms, brutal cartels fighting in Brazil, then another pride parade event just started in Paris.
Guy: "Oh lord, the future is ruled by jesters..."
Guy: "This thing can display a moving painting that gives any information? Alright, let's see what's happening to the world."
The TV then started broadcasting about Russians bombing Ukraine and threatening the West with nuclear bombs, the US ruled by a very old man and spends a lot on military stuff, China ruled by communists and more authoritarian than any absolutist kingdoms, brutal cartels fighting in Brazil, then another pride parade event just started in Paris.
Guy: "Oh lord, the future is ruled by jesters..."
You meant Mustang 😂😊
Hey, at least we have television and great audio now - you just have to buy a dozend different things which barely work together.
This is really specific and unrelated to the video topic, but I was really surprised to hear Beethoven’s op.18 no.6 slow movement at 2:40, a piece that I spent countless hours practicing and performing this year. Great find!
It is always amazing that no one in the deep past could envision a dramatically different APPEARING future. The city of Paris looks more ancient Greek than modern. Like this anecdote still has them in petticoats and living in 18th century homes with horse-drawn carriages. It isn't a huge jump to think that mabe the carriages would propel themselves in the future, or that lights would exist that weren't candles but gave off light "in the way of the sun" with no need to change it. How difficult it is to imagine simple trousers and the concept of the "t-shirt" which is absurdly simple. Or communication across the air which would be fantastic, but is not out of the realm of imagination. The ones in the more modern era predict the idea of smartphones, but they still retain bulky batteries and wires. It is interesting to observe the human imagination does not take dramatic risks with predictions.
This mindset reveals a great deal about our current society, and how we fixate on technological progress, as much as it reveals that people throughout history had different priorities.
@@trudieangelica good point. Most likely the people in the late 1700's didn't even have the ability to invision (or even fathom) what we know later on as technology, so they focused on social progress or political matters as the future advancements that would matter most. It's likeif you asked a Neanderthal what the future would be like... they just wouldn't have a clue what was even capable of being created in 100,000 years. He'd probably say "the mammoth will be extinct and all of us will have different kinds of fresh meat and fruit year round, and the wooden shelters we make will be stronger and warmer at night"
@@Rayrard the full book is not described here. He did predicted simpler clothing and electricity and internet
@@Rayrard for the greek style it is explained by the improvement it brought since the renaissance + its pretty and natural
@@pierren___ Electricity was a known phenomenon at the time, I believe.
"Corruption has been stamped out of the legal system"
Is probably the most humerus line in this video
It’s weirder given the book burning part honestly
Most outlandish part of this future is “no one it above the law” and “2% tax or less with a woolen regularly donating extra to the state”. What a world that would be
People can pay voluntary taxes now.
I am pretty sure no-one ever has.
We are closer to the writing of the book than the date it speaks of. That's insane to think about!
Not it isn't. The Time Machine happens in the year 802701
We're still closer to 1895 the year it was published. I don't see why that should surprise us.
This guy predicted the video screen and CGI. What insane powers of speculation you must have to predict that and so many other things correctly.
Jim Morrison predicted EDM/Drum-n'-Bass
There was a Roman author predicting space travels 2000 years ago, although his story was supposed to be ironic.
@@francisdec1615 I think you are talking of Lucian's "True Story".
Really good video I always learn new stuff on this channel
The only unrealistic thing about the whole story is that a crowd gathered around when he arrived to the future. Most likely everybody would ignore him as people will be either completely antisocial, or they'll already be used to seeing so much weird stuff that nothing can surprise them anymore.
Beautiful art collection. Thank you for your hard work! ❤
Okay .. Kings and Things is one of the best history channel names ive seen. Simple yet elegant
Very unique and creative vision of the future, charming by its intellectualism, respect for the common human, pastoralism and overall simplicity, even if I'm not a fan of how it glamourizes book burning (almost like he had a dent against non-philosophical litterature, especially romance, so much it's funny, "No fun allowed") or the condescendant view of the author on Scotland and Ireland for daring to exist as their own thing. I find it however deeply interesting in how ahead of the curve in mainstream opinion it was on realizing the cruelty of empires and enslaving people and how it treats with respect and sameness human beings of different parts of the world and their cultures (outside Scotland and Ireland), very rare in the 18th century.
Here here
@@l4zrh4wk Hee hee
Some things are really useless... some books are really useless
@@pierren___ so what? Still not a reason to burn them.
@@Game_Hero it actually is lmao. Back in the days you had to save paper
The thing that is most offensive to me is the book burnings lol
This is truly fascinating, and a wonderful video, thank you.
I really appreciate the effort and length of the video
This was pretty well thought out, not in the way its realistic but just good. Maybe that's what it takes to start a trend
It’s interesting how he got some things at-least partially right.
For starters, Slavery Did end, although not in the violent way he predicted.
He predicted China and Japan opening their borders, although China is still fairly isolated as of 2024.
He predicted the end of Serfdom in Russia, although incredibly early.
He predicted the fall of the Ottoman Empire, which was impressive because its decline wouldn’t start for a few decades.
He predicted a United Italy, which was impressive because it wasn’t considered until after the Napoleonic War.
But most interestingly, he somehow predicted the rise of Atheism. That would’ve been nigh undoable back then, yet he did it.
How did he predict the rise of atheism? In the book, society is deeply religious and there are almost no atheists
I swear I love this channel!
Every upload is excellent in it's eclectic nature while maintaining the aspects of the historical theme of the channel.
Always well done.
Also, it's 40 minutes long!!!
Perfect for sending me to dreamland
What a wonderful channel it makes you think about the past and how the future would be fascinating 😊
Five centuries earlier Roger Bacon did predict self propelled vehicles and flying machines. Interesting that this Mercier did predict some kind of video display and sound playback kept separately. Or course fossil fuels are finite so by 2440 a lot of products of the industrial age may have been and gone.
Fossil fuels are finite but our ability to produce energy isn't, at least in the same way. And I doubt a futurist writing at the start of the industrial revolution would consider the idea that resources are finite, that has only come to the forefront in the last century or so. Regardless, I don't think industrialism should be considered at all when discussing this book since I don't think the author had any way of considering it when writing it.
I've heard a little bit about this book from Laurent Dubois' "Avengers of the New World," a book about the history of the Haitian Revolution which references and takes its title from that passage about the statue. Interesting to learn more about how Mercier envisioned the future!
How people in 2012 imagined 2025: Black Ops 2
Why is this novel not credited as the first science fiction novel? (Currently credited to Frankenstein) It is pure speculative fiction
There's the story 'A True Story' written by the Syrian author Lucian of Samosata in the second century. Why isn't THAT credited as the first science fiction novel? 🧐
If you’re calling speculative fiction the same as sci fi then there’s the source of the issue. I know they’re linked and held equivalent at times but if you count anything speculative why not count religious prophecy? Revelations and Ragnarok. No, no. Speculative fiction is a good word for this, a term I like is social science fiction. Books that reimagine the social and economic landscapes of the future. The Blazing World is a book written in 1666 by Margaret Cavendish, this too is a work that gives beautiful insights into a future only the past could imagine.
The first sci-fi story ever written was Gilgamesh lmao
As Apanblod mentioned, the first known piece of literature best fitting the “sci-fi” genre would likely be A True Story by Lucian of Samosata written in the 2nd century AD. Another contender might be Somnium (The Dream) by Johannes Kepler written in 1608. It has been considered to be one of the earliest works of science fiction by people such as Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov.
By the way, the very first book of a genre is not placed in that genre because it technically didn't exist yet.
this is so well produced, its beautiful, soothing to watch:)
First encounter with 'Kings and Things'. Brilliantly put together ... nice narration and choice of music ... I'd heard the glass harmonica before but hadn't realised how old it was! Great care taken with choosing paintings and other illustrations - that alone must have taken hours of research, although I was surprised to see the modern Sydney Opera House at 31:14. Congratulations on a very well produced audio-visual that sustained interest over the full forty minutes. R (Australia)
The most interesting part is trying to picture a "futuristic" society that never experienced the industrial revolution. A future, yet religious and agrarian society that is still friendly to monarchy over republicanism.
What a coincidence! Today, I did a study of this book in my philosophy class, having never heard of it before
In university? Or are you in a country where they teach philosophy in high school?
Now I want a entire movie/game based on this future!
There is already a 1984 videogame.
This is a refreshing and absolutely lovely film, which we are so glad ☺️ that you made. The artistic selections chosen are exquisite and our life is better for having seen them. thank you.
Man, the illustrations are beautiful.
Amazing how much more self aware they were than we give them credit for. It's almost as if we've progressed technologically but regressed intellectually in some aspects.
Recreational Mathematics? This is definitely a dystopia
I had a sudoku loving ex date
I would love to see what people 400 years from now will think of our Sci-fi and just how outlandish it was, I can imagine a lot of ridicule around how Star Trek portrays the 2300s - 2400s despite how good it would be.
They may have no way to watch it, if they are living by making stone and wood tools.
While the Details probably wont be correct, space travel will 100% be a core part of civilization by then.
@@PRH123 Not a chance. Even if our current infrastructure-dependent civilization breaks down, too much is still known. People will still be able to read books, melt scrap metal and glass, draw wire, &c. We will be able to rebuild civilization from almost any imaginable collapse.
@@arcadiaberger9204 think about it, in the 2nd half of the 19th century, long after the industrial revolution had already started, natural resources in many places were laying on the Earth's surface where they could easily obtained, for example the pure copper in northern Michigan, petroleum in Pennsylvania, coal seams near the surface, etc. Those easily accessible resources are gone, most significantly hydrocarbon energy sources that drove the industrial revolution. Those resources are now being sourced from deep under the ocean, or boiled out of oil sands. When humanity is knocked back to the wood and stone age, they won't be able to repeat those steps and easily access those resources again.
Not to mention also that the knowledge of how such things are done is in the heads of a very tiny group of people, and each of them is an expert in their narrow field, none is a master of all of them. If those people are knocked off in the descent back to the wood age, the rest of us who can't hardly put together Ikea furniture are not going to be able :)
@@PRH123 If modern civilization collapses, people will make tools out of scrap metal-- there will be unbelievable amounts of it from the ruins of our civilization.
While future people probably won't be able to watch old sci fi shows and movies, some sci-fi books will survive. I hope the future society doesn't burn its books for being frivolous entertainment.
Love your vids. Keep it up!
very beautiful naration, estetic of video and editing. enjoyed the story very much, thank you!
Funny how in this type of utopian decriptions (modern and, evidently, older too) the solution to religious intollerance it's always something on the line of "all the people are (more or less explicity) forced to belive the same, simple, things and dissuaded/prohibited to diverge from that". Where it's supposed to be the enlighted tollerance and liberty in that?!
Just one person's view.
"There are no atheists, *everyone* is religious... but they're all somehow super chill about it."
@@DinoCism And so it goes... in that man's mind.
@@DinoCism it's a full on contraddiction. Everyones is religious, but any actual discussion about it is frowned upon and nothing can go beyond simple governament approved beliefs. It looks more the dream of a particulary authoritarian medieval pope that an actual humanist utopia.
@@enriquesanchez2001probably that's what happened, but isn't it a little iphocrytal? "Once my beliefs will be the dominant ones there will be true peace and tolerance". Thats legit how terrorist groups justify they're violence.
I love how 'imaginative' and 'out there' the futurism vision from people back then. Its so refreshing. Its so much better than contemporary era where people's imagination and vision seem to be stuck on old and tired popular scifi tropes, so its either star wars or blade runner.
you could read or watch other things, halo is one of my favorites but none of those you mentioned were meant to envision the actual future as in what it would likely be like, especially star wars isn't even set in the future and certainly does not try to be accurate, neither does blade runner i believe
Most science fiction isn’t trying to be a realistic look at future history
Visions of the future alway tell you more about the time they were envisioned in than the future
I was a rush since I woke up later than expected so I put the video on 1.5x but hey! great video!
Watching this again. Great episode and fascinating subject matter. I love to hear what people in the past thought the future would be like. Sometimes they got it almost right. Thumbs up!
Wow that guy described a TV perfectly. Absolute legend