It's crazy to think how ancient the techniques they're using seem to be and this was only the mid 90's! It seriously makes you wonder what kind of technology will be considered run of the mill 20 years from now...
They get away with it more often than not. It’s the scariest part of all of these kinds of shows-knowing there are more out there that never get caught than ones that do.
I can't help but think that this technique could produce false positives for many reasons. It could also produce 'false negatives' for many reasons. I'd be reluctant, if I was on a jury, to accept this as 'proof' of guilt.
Juries are always intentionally stocked with Stupid People. Instead of getting a Jury of your "peers", you are more likely to end-up with a Jury stocked with people who watch way too much Daytime Television. Heck, if they REALLY WERE a Jury of Your Peers, they each would have figured out how to GET OUT OF JURY DUTY in the first place!! [
Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean it's not reliable. First off this is extremely basic digital enhancement from the 90's, the technologies they use today are way more incredible. And second off they are rigorously tested for repeatability and a strict chain of custody is maintained. Trust me, these technologies are incredible and certainly reliable. Otherwise the scientific community wouldn't dare endorse them. Do you know how the scientific method even works? It's all about trying to prove your theory _wrong_ and most things that can stand up to that scrutiny from a massive pool of professionals can certainly be counted on.
@@johnberry5275 If you end up with a stupid jury perhaps you should be looking at yourself, because you're probably an even bigger idiot for ending up in a position where your freedom or life hangs on their scrutiny. Don't be so quick to judge others.
_IT WAS A HOAX, FOLKS!!!!_ I know this bc I’m a highly skeptical psychologist and thought it sounded like BS ,so I looked it up!. I called it! You all should really use the Internet to look into these cases before getting all riled up! That’s what it’s there for!
@ Lisa Smyth, Amazing to think we've came from finger printing to DNA of all matters to Now Brain Finger printing!!. I Just wonder what will be the next thing to catch Criminals.... Possibly some kind of brain finger printing that will literally make the criminals Say exactly what happened in there own words... 'Almost like being Hypnotized but more in depth!!'.. Like you said though it is Amazing what Scientists have discovered, Never mind what they have discovered over even just the Last 50/60 year's..🤔👍
@@scottthebrave695 - As long as there will be criminals who try to commit the “perfect crime” the technology must gets better and better to catch them. The criminals will never get away with a murder, unless no one cares for the victim.
@@TheRight-handedStranger , Yes Sara i do Agree in what you are Saying. But Criminals have 'Always' been Playing a Cat and Mouse Kind of Game with Technology, Time Changing, etc, etc Over the Years....
The actress for Dawn looks very different than the actual victim. I've seen this case on Forensic Files. It's tragic though, her family describes her as such a lovely person.
I actually forced 20 random people to sit tied up in chairs with electrodes attached to their heads showing them pictures of my family vacation. All I eventually discovered was that they all hated me with a passion. I can't figure out why.
Another great video of The New Detectives showing advanced technology. Very interesting indeed. Love these shows, they are awesome. Thank you for sharing it. 👍👍👍👌👌
First i would like to say that forensic teams are really really good at what they do, very professional. Now that being said, first i would try to re-create the print from my own hand before risking the actual evidence to a untested process. So if successful or not, i still have the evidence available for when the science catches up. Still this technician is brilliant in his skill and methods. And when we get better with the science of evidence, less innocent people will be in jail or have a criminal record. That is what i call "Progress", all the while proactively moving forward.
'Brain fingerprinting' makes a grandiose claim: to know the nature of a thought and to be able to actually recognise such a 'thought'. The word 'quackery' springs to mind.
To skip all the ads, drag the progress bar to the end and then hit replay. If you're on a playlist, drag progress bar past yellow dots and then back to the beginning. You're welcome.
People! Get rid of the ads by hauling the red button along to the end of the video, then haul it back to the beginning. No ads! I'm watching it without any ads, nor do you have to pay for premium.
Down UA-cam Vanced off internet. Google owns UA-cam and the Playstore so they have an illegal monopoly and don't have it but u can find it on ur browser
I have actually met Princess Diana bodyguard,very nice and down to earth man,looking at his scars I would honestly say that I would believe he has know memory of the crash,lucky man to get out alive.
4 роки тому+12
Today "brain fingerprinting" is not an accepted technique for either this or that; "fringe" is maybe the best word.
Researchers found that out pretty quickly. People tend to be intrigued enough by time saving devices that they’ll take a lot on spec, even if it’s costing some cash.
How would brain fingerprinting work for someone who is insane? Someone who is schizophrenic or some other mental illness might cause irregular brain activity in responses
"Brain fingerprinting" ... easily defeated by invoking the 5th amendment, sticking with it, and refusing all interrogation. As an example: talk with a cardiac surgeon about chemical and anesthetic (or any other kind of) psychosis. Some experiences are "real" enough to be 100-&-truly-%-believed by the subject, yet are 100-and-truly-%-false.
Does anyone realize how dangerous brain-finger printing could be to freedom... They could judge people on the basis of politics, loyalty or opposition to the current government. Police feel that they have the right to probe your mind? The device may be based on science but the conclusions drawn are not.
Psychopaths pass polygraphs with regularity, bc they’re accomplished liars and have no conscience. And that whole brain fingerprinting, or whatever was a hoax.
Y ku y Orión uno u you ooo odio yu yu oyó you y initiation of Y y Our y You yoyo yo yo-yo yoy you you outpourings you y options ohm you you youjo. Koi ik out i cv Tuin I’m Koi i I. O koiij i. I. Ok I’m O o. V O. K. Mo b ob osaid O. O. O I Cm O i. Ohm i o. V Orión. M. Ii mo. I Oo. O VM o o. M o. I’m Koi koi kimono o o ooijobob oh. I o mo. O B O. O o K. I om O. O. O. K. Kibbo oo Is oiij Mg. Mov oki v. Vo voik Voo mv o m. O Jo o. man v I I’m o so u you’ll. U ku you y up y
Y ku y Orión uno u you ooo odio yu yu oyó you y initiation of Y y Our y You yoyo yo yo-yo yoy you you outpourings you y options ohm you you youjo. Koi ik out i cv Tuin I’m Koi i I. O koiij i. I. Ok I’m O o. V O. K. Mo b ob osaid O. O. O I Cm O i. Ohm i o. V Orión. M. Ii mo. I Oo. O VM o o. M o. I’m Koi koi kimono o o ooijobob oh. I o mo. O B O. O o K. I om O. O. O. K. Kibbo oo Is oiij Mg. Mov oki v. Vo voik Voo mv o m. O Jo o. man v I I’m o so u you’ll. U ku you y up y
Look at D.N.A. Look how many of these people have gotten a knock on the door 30 years later. If you learn nothing else from these programs you learn that homicide cases never go away. If you did it, I believe you will get caught at some point. It is a little scary though to think that at some point they may have the technology to read your mind.
I agree with all 3 of these comments. I hope I don't sound too much like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat here but what if our brains are already being fingerprinted through cell phones, computers, ear buds, smart tv's/phones/watches, fitbits etc. We already know they're listening to us from conversations we have and then the ads or videos that are "suggested" for us. Like the other comment here.... technology is scarier and is far more advanced than we know. (Yikes, I really DO sound like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat lol) Cheers all 🙂
@@9333Jhatch I thought I was nuts that ads kept appearing on facebook or youtube that were about stuff I had been talking about. Not anything I had done a search for.
@Anne Arteaga A Clockwork Orange, novel by Anthony Burgess, published in 1962. Set in a dismal dystopian England, it is the first-person account of a juvenile delinquent who undergoes state-sponsored psychological rehabilitation for his aberrant behaviour. In the movie, the guy is bound, eyes pried open, and forced to watch images and hear sounds.
They can't perfectly replicate it so it would just be pointless. They knew it worked already and it was their only choice so there was nothing to lose.
An attorney and a district judge allowed a group of us business students to sit in on a trial. We learned much. From my perspective, only the ‘dull’ defendants get caught.
Sitting in one trial won’t tell you that. There are plenty of murderers on death row who were certified geniuses by Mensa, but the really smart ones get caught bc they rate their abilities too highly.
I would be very skeptical about relying on that brain fingerprinting technology. The testing they demonstrated here relied on using words and acronyms that only particular people would recognize. If the machine only detects recognition in a brain, then I could think of endless scenarios in which false positives could be generated. If you were showing a picture of a woman who was a victim, then many people might recall an old friend or classmate who happened to look like her. I don't know if this tech could discern the difference. Also, an evidential weapon, like a knife or a gun could easily resemble one that you've seen or owned before. In fact, I would presume that most weapons used in a crime are ones that many people would recall seeing in their past. If the technology was very precise in determining how well you know an image and how recent it was saved in memory, then this maybe could be a good investigative tool like the polygraph.
AAANNDD that's why the Lie Detector Test is not admissable in court. The only thging it's good for ... if you get a guilty person on the machine, is trip them up with guilty thoughts, allowing them the oppurtunity to make mistakes.
at 7:55 she is pouring the batter into a glass container which is on top of the stove coiled burner, and it looks like she's pouring the batter over the burner.
What if we watch a movie of a crime? We would have a memory of that. Also, it's unclear if Farwell's "study" was blinded with Farwell blinded to the status of participants.
The FBI did their own test, using the Farwell equipment/software. They put FBI cadets, and non-cadets, into the test (to try to detect who was, or was not, an agent/cadet.)
Why don’t we see these brain tools being used at all now? This was a long time ago... so I haven’t seen any crimes that this tool has been used in. This seems like a pretty legit tool to be using.
How do you know they are not being used? Just because it isn't in tv shows doesn't mean it isn't used. Most of the tv stuff is BS anyway (at least the way they show it is).
I strongly believe that The Old Standard, the Polygraph Machine, is not a Lie Detector, but, instead, it is actually a *Peer Pressure* detector. For example, consider all the times when a witness claims to have seen either *Ghosts* or *Little Green Men* or *Bigfoot* . The witness _knows_ that The Prevailing Peer Group wants everyone to always say that "Ghosts do not exist!" (
And if they're willing to divulge these particular criminal apprehending techniques - just imagine the techniques they; local police, state police, the FBI, etc, are utilizing to catch criminals.
Why didn't the police ran the vacuum cleaner inside the house even if he looked meticulously clean you know the police could have picked up a hair of that person that killed her inside the vacuum cleaner bag
Idk why the guy in the lab didn’t test a small patch of the fabric before submerging the evidence lol🤦🏼♀️ they could have gotten some blood and put a hand print of the same fabric and tried it with that first lol
All you had to do was google it and you’d have found out it was a hoax....there isn’t going to be that kind of technology in a long, long time, if ever. For one thing, how do you “test” a memory?? In order for a psychological technology to work, it has to be studied and tested, then a paper has to be published in a peer reviewed journal. Then, researchers working in the same area (peers) conduct studies exactly as done in the published study and tabulate results. The technology has to be successfully replicated several times until it’s given a stamp of approval. Again....how do you “test” a memory? Right. You can’t. Brain fingerprinting didn’t even get published, it was so bogus.
If your interested in getting rid of the adds just start the video...skip to 10 seconds from the end...let it play out then press restart...adds gone!!!
If you develop brain fingerprint software or thoughts interface, it should be kept a secret. The implications of such technology affect national security. A pilot aided by thoughts interface artificial intelligence is undefeatable. His response time would be incredibly short. His strategy and tactics would be impeccable. His spatial perceptions would be augmented by the artificial intelligence, in real time.
Funny thing, I see the same cars being used in most every episode. When they mentioned "high performance sports car" in the Archie Woods story I knew it would be the red Camaro used in several other episodes. Few other cars I see is silver silver Mercury Cougar and various pick up trucks.
Kirkland- Washington- Seattle- 1995 - Randy a passerby noticed the door was open in an apartment and found a woman later identified as Dawn Ferring murdered in the house and called the police and a man named Eric Hayden who lived in the same apartment complex became a suspect. My comments kept disappearing here.
It is great the new digital technology and the advancements with new ways to catch criminals and find evidences. This new brain fingerprinting is awesome! A great tool to find criminals committing murders or any other type of crimes. Wow! Truly awesome!
why didnt the guy trying to get the print off the sheet do a test first🙄 like using his own fingerprint on a sheet and seeing if it worked instead of almost ruining a piece of evidence on a hunch
Maybe the next technology is EYE SCANNING or EYE FINGER PRINTING ...to know what the killer have seen during his killing spree...though just pure imagination in my part.
The brain is not a piece of hardware and human memory isn't permanently implanted in it. In fact, memories like dreams are largely the product of one's own creati0n. Such devices could be useful tools for "convicting" and punishing various "enemies of the State," however.
OK: Scenario. A well known celeb/personage gets killed with an axe. If you show the suspected perpetrator a photo of the celeb. their brain will respond in the affirmative. Show the suspect an axe and their brain will respond in the affirmative; a recognition of the victim and weapon is acknowledged. Will the police propose that this implies guilt? If so you could potentially have 3-4 billion suspects. A ridiculous proposition!
*wow* implicating your motorcycle gang in a double homicide instead of taking the heat for something _you_ did? I'm sure he had a *great* time when he got to prison.
the brain image thing sounds ok but what if the cops bring in somebody that thought about killing a person the victim but never really did do it. Perhaps they had dreamed of it at some point . The mind would have made images and those images could be similar to what happened in a crime thus making the graph show a positive that is really a negative
Amazing how luminol changed investigation. What before took such difficult analyses can now be done in moments with a spray from a bottle.
It's crazy to think how ancient the techniques they're using seem to be and this was only the mid 90's! It seriously makes you wonder what kind of technology will be considered run of the mill 20 years from now...
Just in my lifetime has been amazing
They get away with it more often than not. It’s the scariest part of all of these kinds of shows-knowing there are more out there that never get caught than ones that do.
I can't help but think that this technique could produce false positives for many reasons. It could also produce 'false negatives' for many reasons. I'd be reluctant, if I was on a jury, to accept this as 'proof' of guilt.
Juries are always intentionally stocked with Stupid People. Instead of getting a Jury of your "peers", you are more likely to end-up with a Jury stocked with people who watch way too much Daytime Television. Heck, if they REALLY WERE a Jury of Your Peers, they each would have figured out how to GET OUT OF JURY DUTY in the first place!!
[
Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean it's not reliable. First off this is extremely basic digital enhancement from the 90's, the technologies they use today are way more incredible. And second off they are rigorously tested for repeatability and a strict chain of custody is maintained. Trust me, these technologies are incredible and certainly reliable. Otherwise the scientific community wouldn't dare endorse them. Do you know how the scientific method even works? It's all about trying to prove your theory _wrong_ and most things that can stand up to that scrutiny from a massive pool of professionals can certainly be counted on.
@@johnberry5275 If you end up with a stupid jury perhaps you should be looking at yourself, because you're probably an even bigger idiot for ending up in a position where your freedom or life hangs on their scrutiny. Don't be so quick to judge others.
_IT WAS A HOAX, FOLKS!!!!_ I know this bc I’m a highly skeptical psychologist and thought it sounded like BS ,so I looked it up!. I called it! You all should really use the Internet to look into these cases before getting all riled up! That’s what it’s there for!
@@voraciousreader3341 so what does psychology say about a person who excessively overuses exclamation points?
Amazing to watch these series and see how far the tech has become!..
@ Lisa Smyth, Amazing to think we've came from finger printing to DNA of all matters to Now Brain Finger printing!!. I Just wonder what will be the next thing to catch Criminals.... Possibly some kind of brain finger printing that will literally make the criminals Say exactly what happened in there own words... 'Almost like being Hypnotized but more in depth!!'.. Like you said though it is Amazing what Scientists have discovered, Never mind what they have discovered over even just the Last 50/60 year's..🤔👍
Yes your right on that one
Pop0p
@@scottthebrave695 - As long as there will be criminals who try to commit the “perfect crime” the technology must gets better and better to catch them. The criminals will never get away with a murder, unless no one cares for the victim.
@@TheRight-handedStranger , Yes Sara i do Agree in what you are Saying. But Criminals have 'Always' been Playing a Cat and Mouse Kind of Game with Technology, Time Changing, etc, etc Over the Years....
You know I think I've just about seen all these episodes. I still watch them cause I cant always remember what happens. But love this channel.
The actress for Dawn looks very different than the actual victim. I've seen this case on Forensic Files. It's tragic though, her family describes her as such a lovely person.
In re-enactments, they don’t need to find lookalikes. It’s all about recreating the drama of the situation!
I actually forced 20 random people to sit tied up in chairs with electrodes attached to their heads showing them pictures of my family vacation. All I eventually discovered was that they all hated me with a passion. I can't figure out why.
LOL
👀🤔😂😂
Very interesting information about the advance of forensic science. I'm very glad that the perpetrator was caught
Honestly speaking, detectives I wish I was one of you. Thanks.
Another great video of The New Detectives showing advanced technology. Very interesting indeed. Love these shows, they are awesome. Thank you for sharing it. 👍👍👍👌👌
The New Detectives series ended 17 years ago in 2004. The narrator was Gene Galusha who dies in 2008.
First i would like to say that forensic teams are really really good at what they do, very professional. Now that being said, first i would try to re-create the print from my own hand before risking the actual evidence to a untested process. So if successful or not, i still have the evidence available for when the science catches up. Still this technician is brilliant in his skill and methods. And when we get better with the science of evidence, less innocent people will be in jail or have a criminal record. That is what i call "Progress", all the while proactively moving forward.
'Brain fingerprinting' makes a grandiose claim: to know the nature of a thought and to be able to actually recognise such a 'thought'. The word 'quackery' springs to mind.
To skip all the ads, drag the progress bar to the end and then hit replay. If you're on a playlist, drag progress bar past yellow dots and then back to the beginning.
You're welcome.
Thank you.
Thank you I hate the adds...
You are so smart! Thank you!
Or just use ad block plus for free
Or download a adblocker like everybody else!
I like this series (and I've subscribed) because it's SO FREE OF SENSATIONALISM👍👍👍👍
@ Crime Watch Daily. Their style of journalism is so annoying.
I agree and the narrator is awesome
dont be a snowflake
People! Get rid of the ads by hauling the red button along to the end of the video, then haul it back to the beginning. No ads! I'm watching it without any ads, nor do you have to pay for premium.
I was watching youtube adS when i was constantly disrupted by archie woods story.... wth....
Awesome, lol!!
Down UA-cam Vanced off internet. Google owns UA-cam and the Playstore so they have an illegal monopoly and don't have it but u can find it on ur browser
I have actually met Princess Diana bodyguard,very nice and down to earth man,looking at his scars I would honestly say that I would believe he has know memory of the crash,lucky man to get out alive.
Today "brain fingerprinting" is not an accepted technique for either this or that; "fringe" is maybe the best word.
Researchers found that out pretty quickly. People tend to be intrigued enough by time saving devices that they’ll take a lot on spec, even if it’s costing some cash.
@33:06 technician needed a bigger “Back-Stop” than that clipboard .... When demonstrating arterial spray.. 😂
How would brain fingerprinting work for someone who is insane? Someone who is schizophrenic or some other mental illness might cause irregular brain activity in responses
My exact question!!
Those old gateway computers were rock solid until the caps dried up!
Isn't that true for everything? I used to rebuild old recording equipment. 99% of the time capacitors were the culprits!
The amount of ads are absurd!!
You can drag the cursor to the last part then go back to the very beginning to avoid the ads
Do you mean to drag the curser to the beginning of the show? It doesn't seem to work but I don't know if I'm doing it right...
@@JosannaMonik drag cursor almost to the end then drag it back to beginning and let it play.
Ads? Zero ads for me. Only chanel on YT that i dont get ads on tho...
@@JosannaMonik drag it to the end , let it play last few seconds then hit replay
"Brain fingerprinting" ... easily defeated by invoking the 5th amendment, sticking with it, and refusing all interrogation. As an example: talk with a cardiac surgeon about chemical and anesthetic (or any other kind of) psychosis. Some experiences are "real" enough to be 100-&-truly-%-believed by the subject, yet are 100-and-truly-%-false.
Does anyone realize how dangerous brain-finger printing could be to freedom... They could judge people on the basis of politics, loyalty or opposition to the current government. Police feel that they have the right to probe your mind? The device may be based on science but the conclusions drawn are not.
@@Larkinchance I guess in that respect, a polygraph would be the same thing.
Ted Bundy passed a polygraph, no way would I trust a brainwave test..
Psychopaths pass polygraphs with regularity, bc they’re accomplished liars and have no conscience. And that whole brain fingerprinting, or whatever was a hoax.
@@voraciousreader3341 Essequibo was
Is it physically possible to have any more ads in an hour long show than this channel?!
Nice to see someone learning from Morgz
@Jakob Benson just download an adblocker, no need to manually skip ads or risk watching one to get past the others
My advice is install Ad Block. It works like a charm. :)
Elizabeth Darsey, thanks for saving me lots of aggravation. Ads annoy the hell out of me. I never listen or watch 'em
I just read you message, so I will not be watching!!!!
Amazing technology......especially the "brain finger printing concept".......... Truly spaced age stuff.
Killer had to be stark raving insane to do what he did. Killers look like everybody else, I've found out from these videos. Horrifying.
Y ku y Orión uno u you ooo odio yu yu oyó you y initiation of
Y y
Our y
You yoyo yo yo-yo yoy you you outpourings you y options ohm you you youjo.
Koi ik out i cv Tuin I’m
Koi i
I. O koiij i. I. Ok I’m O o. V
O. K. Mo b ob osaid
O. O. O
I Cm
O i. Ohm i o. V
Orión.
M. Ii mo. I
Oo. O VM o o. M o. I’m
Koi koi kimono o o ooijobob oh. I o mo. O
B
O. O o
K. I om
O. O.
O. K. Kibbo oo
Is oiij
Mg. Mov oki v. Vo voik
Voo mv o m. O
Jo o. man v
I I’m o so u you’ll. U ku you y up y
Y ku y Orión uno u you ooo odio yu yu oyó you y initiation of
Y y
Our y
You yoyo yo yo-yo yoy you you outpourings you y options ohm you you youjo.
Koi ik out i cv Tuin I’m
Koi i
I. O koiij i. I. Ok I’m O o. V
O. K. Mo b ob osaid
O. O. O
I Cm
O i. Ohm i o. V
Orión.
M. Ii mo. I
Oo. O VM o o. M o. I’m
Koi koi kimono o o ooijobob oh. I o mo. O
B
O. O o
K. I om
O. O.
O. K. Kibbo oo
Is oiij
Mg. Mov oki v. Vo voik
Voo mv o m. O
Jo o. man v
I I’m o so u you’ll. U ku you y up y
@@biiornpermit5655 interesting point you made there. Fascinating even.
@@biiornpermit5655 What's your point genius ?
*@Argile* - Which killer?? And you’re mostly seeing actors, just thought I’d mention that!
i dont know whats scarier..the crime, or brain fingerprinting.
Look at D.N.A. Look how many of these people have gotten a knock on the door 30 years later. If you learn nothing else from these programs you learn that homicide cases never go away.
If you did it, I believe you will get caught at some point.
It is a little scary though to think that at some point they may have the technology to read your mind.
Technology is scarier
I agree with all 3 of these comments.
I hope I don't sound too much like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat here but what if our brains are already being fingerprinted through cell phones, computers, ear buds, smart tv's/phones/watches, fitbits etc. We already know they're listening to us from conversations we have and then the ads or videos that are "suggested" for us.
Like the other comment here.... technology is scarier and is far more advanced than we know.
(Yikes, I really DO sound like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat lol) Cheers all 🙂
@@9333Jhatch I thought I was nuts that ads kept appearing on facebook or youtube that were about stuff I had been talking about. Not anything I had done a search for.
This reminds me of the movie "A Clockwork Orange". If you've seen the movie, you know what I'm talking about.
@Anne Arteaga A Clockwork Orange, novel by Anthony Burgess, published in 1962. Set in a dismal dystopian England, it is the first-person account of a juvenile delinquent who undergoes state-sponsored psychological rehabilitation for his aberrant behaviour. In the movie, the guy is bound, eyes pried open, and forced to watch images and hear sounds.
@Anne Arteaga LOL. I was 14. I didn't see the movie until many years later. I read the book first.
I'm singing in the rain!
Part of the clockwork orange was filmed in Thamesmead, where I grew up.
That was one weird movie
Thanks for this and all your uploads.
11:00 were they really that dumb? They could have tested it on a non- crucial evidence cloth or am I missing something 🧐
They can't perfectly replicate it so it would just be pointless. They knew it worked already and it was their only choice so there was nothing to lose.
An attorney and a district judge allowed a group of us business students to sit in on a trial. We learned much. From my perspective, only the ‘dull’ defendants get caught.
Sitting in one trial won’t tell you that. There are plenty of murderers on death row who were certified geniuses by Mensa, but the really smart ones get caught bc they rate their abilities too highly.
I got halfway through and still no mention of "brain fingerprinting" so I looked it up. I knew something with such a stupid name must be bogus.
The real crime here was the 1,318 adverts.
@d3adsoulja always get one idiot.. let me know when your Adblock works on mobile 👏
Some darn good police work. Brilliant.
I would be very skeptical about relying on that brain fingerprinting technology. The testing they demonstrated here relied on using words and acronyms that only particular people would recognize. If the machine only detects recognition in a brain, then I could think of endless scenarios in which false positives could be generated. If you were showing a picture of a woman who was a victim, then many people might recall an old friend or classmate who happened to look like her. I don't know if this tech could discern the difference. Also, an evidential weapon, like a knife or a gun could easily resemble one that you've seen or owned before. In fact, I would presume that most weapons used in a crime are ones that many people would recall seeing in their past. If the technology was very precise in determining how well you know an image and how recent it was saved in memory, then this maybe could be a good investigative tool like the polygraph.
AAANNDD that's why the Lie Detector Test is not admissable in court. The only thging it's good for ... if you get a guilty person on the machine, is trip them up with guilty thoughts, allowing them the oppurtunity to make mistakes.
In the Kirkland case the guy received 26 years.
Someone else did it , but I can't tell you who it was. That always works huh? Brain finger printing? Watch out "Minority Report(movie)?"
I'm always amazed why murders think they can get away with the muder
at 7:55 she is pouring the batter into a glass container which is on top of the stove coiled burner, and it looks like she's pouring the batter over the burner.
What if we watch a movie of a crime? We would have a memory of that. Also, it's unclear if Farwell's "study" was blinded with Farwell blinded to the status of participants.
The FBI did their own test, using the Farwell equipment/software. They put FBI cadets, and non-cadets, into the test (to try to detect who was, or was not, an agent/cadet.)
I'll bet you get reminded of the prevailing 'Karen' même about 10 times per day.
@@johnberry5275 I do 🤪
Why don’t we see these brain tools being used at all now? This was a long time ago... so I haven’t seen any crimes that this tool has been used in. This seems like a pretty legit tool to be using.
How do you know they are not being used? Just because it isn't in tv shows doesn't mean it isn't used. Most of the tv stuff is BS anyway (at least the way they show it is).
How Long Does It Take To Cook A Grit?
Is It Possible To Eat Just One Grit ?
You have to use brain fingerprinting to cook a grit.
Yes one grir
that detective clump dude ever shut his damn eyes or what?
off the adderall to catch criminals with incredible efficiency
14:37 lol, windows 95 ? in 2020 you are fugged.......... tecnology will find you instant
Why the hell would you sleep there with your partner, the guy thinks your a thief...🤦
I strongly believe that The Old Standard, the Polygraph Machine, is not a Lie Detector, but, instead, it is actually a *Peer Pressure* detector. For example, consider all the times when a witness claims to have seen either *Ghosts* or *Little Green Men* or *Bigfoot* . The witness _knows_ that The Prevailing Peer Group wants everyone to always say that "Ghosts do not exist!" (
It's not advisable in court because its bunk science.
It's mind blowing all the tool's they have nowadays..
What ads ? You all watchi some dunky channel,,!,
you mean 20 years ago xD
Yup, you can't get away with murder these days
And if they're willing to divulge these particular criminal apprehending techniques - just imagine the techniques they; local police, state police, the FBI, etc, are utilizing to catch criminals.
Yeah over 20 years ago imagine now
Yay, Science! ⚗️🔬🧬🦠🧫🧪🌡
Why didn't the police ran the vacuum cleaner inside the house even if he looked meticulously clean you know the police could have picked up a hair of that person that killed her inside the vacuum cleaner bag
What a great way to get your house vacuumed free of charge!
Idk why the guy in the lab didn’t test a small patch of the fabric before submerging the evidence lol🤦🏼♀️ they could have gotten some blood and put a hand print of the same fabric and tried it with that first lol
Only 1,000 commercials during this episode, so exactly how do people use these to go to sleep?
Brain fingerprinting seems promising but has ways to go. It would be great if they fine tune and develop it further to make it foolproof to errors.
All you had to do was google it and you’d have found out it was a hoax....there isn’t going to be that kind of technology in a long, long time, if ever. For one thing, how do you “test” a memory?? In order for a psychological technology to work, it has to be studied and tested, then a paper has to be published in a peer reviewed journal. Then, researchers working in the same area (peers) conduct studies exactly as done in the published study and tabulate results. The technology has to be successfully replicated several times until it’s given a stamp of approval. Again....how do you “test” a memory? Right. You can’t. Brain fingerprinting didn’t even get published, it was so bogus.
Not feeling sorry for a drug dealer killing a drug dealer but
If your interested in getting rid of the adds just start the video...skip to 10 seconds from the end...let it play out then press restart...adds gone!!!
Adblockers or UA-cam premium and you will never see another ad or have to go through the process you are currently doing
Paul Hollywood was a Consultant on that case thats how an accurate time of death was established... but the brownies were a dry for him..
I heard paul attended the victim's bake off ...er send off.
You can run, but you can never hide!!
If you develop brain fingerprint software or thoughts interface, it should be kept a secret.
The implications of such technology affect national security.
A pilot aided by thoughts interface artificial intelligence is undefeatable.
His response time would be incredibly short. His strategy and tactics would be impeccable. His spatial perceptions would be augmented by the artificial intelligence, in real time.
Funny thing, I see the same cars being used in most every episode. When they mentioned "high performance sports car" in the Archie Woods story I knew it would be the red Camaro used in several other episodes. Few other cars I see is silver silver Mercury Cougar and various pick up trucks.
"....10:30 a.m. in the morning." WTF?
who's not nervous questioned by investigators ?
Magnificent technology
Under the best of conditions finger prints are not foolproof
Kirkland- Washington- Seattle- 1995 - Randy a passerby noticed the door was open in an apartment and found a woman later identified as Dawn Ferring murdered in the house and called the police and a man named Eric Hayden who lived in the same apartment complex became a suspect. My comments kept disappearing here.
35:28 WTH was that tongue?!? 😂
It does say the second crime was happening in 1987, yet, at 25:22 they show us a 1997 calendar . Now I am confused :)
Sometimes a crime that is noted and dated emerges years later due to new evidence
I don't know why they didn't try their own print on a similar fabric and dip it in amino black before dipping the real fabric with the print
It is great the new digital technology and the advancements with new ways to catch criminals and find evidences. This new brain fingerprinting is awesome! A great tool to find criminals committing murders or any other type of crimes. Wow! Truly awesome!
Tell me you’re joking. Brain fingerprinting proved to be a hoax.
Why didn't he get some blood, a matching sheet and test ways to pull a print instead of using the actual evidence as a test?
0:08 damn I didn’t know this was one of those films
He was notified at 10:30 a.m. in the morning. Not 10:30 a.m. in the evening.
I bet theres friggin ads in that brain fingerprinting too !
Skip right to the end then press the replay Button
Didn’t say what sentence the first one got. This is the first one of these programmes I’ve watched that didn’t.
He only got 26 years, which is a complete miscarriage of justice, and may be the reason his sentence wasn’t included.
Why they need a search warrant for a murder scene?
In the Archie Woods case? Because they hadn't yet proved that it was the murder scene.
Can you say "F I F T H A M E N D M E N T"?
why didnt the guy trying to get the print off the sheet do a test first🙄 like using his own fingerprint on a sheet and seeing if it worked instead of almost ruining a piece of evidence on a hunch
Maybe the next technology is EYE SCANNING or EYE FINGER PRINTING ...to know what the killer have seen during his killing spree...though just pure imagination in my part.
The eye does not see, or remember what it has seen. That’s all in the brain.
The brain is not a piece of hardware and human memory isn't permanently implanted in it. In fact, memories like dreams are largely the product of one's own creati0n. Such devices could be useful tools for "convicting" and punishing various "enemies of the State," however.
OK: Scenario.
A well known celeb/personage gets killed with an axe.
If you show the suspected perpetrator a photo of the celeb. their brain will respond in the affirmative.
Show the suspect an axe and their brain will respond in the affirmative; a recognition of the victim and weapon is acknowledged.
Will the police propose that this implies guilt? If so you could potentially have 3-4 billion suspects. A ridiculous proposition!
Looking at the thumbnail I thought jeez Tucker looks rough.
Did they honestly say they hoped the hand print would finger the killer?
You need to watch some James Cagney movies
I thought the guy was Joe Walsh. But how dumb can you be to wipe your hands on a sheet?
Poor girl !
Was Hayden released from prison?
*wow* implicating your motorcycle gang in a double homicide instead of taking the heat for something _you_ did? I'm sure he had a *great* time when he got to prison.
Why do I feel it's similar to lie detector test ????
Amazing
Nice
video!
the brain image thing sounds ok but what if the cops bring in somebody that thought about killing a person the victim but never really did do it. Perhaps they had dreamed of it at some point . The mind would have made images and those images could be similar to what happened in a crime thus making the graph show a positive that is really a negative
The moral of the story is.......always carry your own tissues 👍🏻
Brain fingerprinting doesnt work. One can keep his eyes at the corner of the screen and look at no pictures at all
Too many Ads. Stopped watching it. Real Responders should learn to be optimal to be successful not greedy.
download Adblock on Google Chrome (its free and not sketchy) and you will never see ads on youtube!
@@mallom6226 Thanks Mallo
Or, it also works to fastforward until comletely end,then rewind almost til start,( whitout stop ), and then you can se it all with no ads.
@@bezzerwizzer6448 thanks
dam the ads!!!!!!!!
LESS COMMERCIALS. THIS IS RIDICULOUS
Skynet will use these techniques to track us down.
Angelnet will destroy skynet
I wish the description said what year this happened.
They keep saying May 12th but not the year
I heard "1995".
1995. He said it around the 2:12 mark
Maybe this technique will help keep innocent people out of jail.
So the girlfriend lets the police in the house and they are inspecting all over BEFORE they have a search warrant?
It's called a consent search