Yeah i think so, and I also thought of adding holes along the top of the pipe and covering them with an extra layer of pipe where I only close the top and leave the bottom open to allow extra air to enter the combustion.
Nice to see some innovations! I think it might be improved by allowing more air out at the top, the airflow seemed to get worse when you put the pan on top. Maybe you could lift the pan another inch or two?
@goldar4846 I would be good enough if I got the pile length ratio correct. I will soon be making a new and more effective type, that eliminates some of the constraints of the one in this video
What a lovely and cozy video!
And a beautiful rocket stove
Thanks, buhl. I appreciate the comment
Thats a great design. I feel like insulating the outside would increase its efficiency by a large margin.
Yeah i think so, and I also thought of adding holes along the top of the pipe and covering them with an extra layer of pipe where I only close the top and leave the bottom open to allow extra air to enter the combustion.
Nice to see some innovations!
I think it might be improved by allowing more air out at the top, the airflow seemed to get worse when you put the pan on top. Maybe you could lift the pan another inch or two?
Yeah I am trying to work that out. I will be making a new iteration soon
Nice man! Are the relatively narrow dimensions required? Could you scale it up 200% on the x and y axes for more cooking space at the top?
Yes, absolutely 💯.
nice
Thanks
Why do you keep the ash pan open?
Sometimes, it helps with the airflow
But you have a whole port at the bottom for airflow. Why is that not good enough?
@goldar4846 I would be good enough if I got the pile length ratio correct. I will soon be making a new and more effective type, that eliminates some of the constraints of the one in this video
@@JuliusTheFabricator Thanks. What is the correct ratio?
@@goldar4846 The ratio is 1:2:4: 1 part feed tube, 2 part burn chamber and 4 parts heatriser
nice
Thanks