Glad to hear that, @rickhaun! It makes the production process more time-consuming, but if it improves the experience, it’s worth every minute of work. 😉
Thank you for reassuring me about the improvements, @Arzola7. Your feedback is truly valuable in cases like this. Steve is on the list, but it takes some time to get to him (others are already scheduled), so please bear with me. 😉
Converting it to 2024 money is appreciated. I'm a bit of a figure hound myself, often Googling those figures when it peaks my interest (as it so often does). However, while I'm actually very good at digesting information quickly, even I had to pause the video several times to read all the figures. Might I suggest you slow the crawl a little so I don't have to keep pausing.
Thank you, @FrancisXLord! I'm glad you like the improvements. Feedback like this really keeps me motivated. The crawl is already slightly slower compared to my previous non-inflation-adjusted videos, but I’ll definitely consider slowing it down even more-perhaps gradually, from one video to another, to find the sweet spot. In the meantime, consider using UA-cam's built-in playback speed options. Thank you again; your input is truly valuable to me. 🙂
New additions to the format are great! You are the only one I trust with these stats despite others trying to copy. Unless they are on your channel, in my eyes, they don't exist! keep up the good work and btw Jack Lemon, Brad Pitt and Sean Connery?
Thank you, @Derek-vg3fg! Your words really mean a lot to me right now. I’ve also noticed some copycat channels, and it’s quite sad how they’re trying to turn my idea into a mass production of low-quality videos based on poor research. They clearly lack genuine enthusiasm and passion, yet they still manage to grab some views. Anyway, loyal viewers like yourself are truly priceless, and I hope people will notice the difference in quality and passion over time. Lemmon, Pitt, and Connery are all added to the list, and I will cover them all eventually. Thanks again for your support; it's much appreciated. 😉
Finally I would assume at some point you'd want to do directors as well like Nolan and Abrams and Spielberg etc...just to mix it up. Again good work and GL
I think its a good idea what u did with these cards. I think maybe in the future u should do videos like these from time to time with the actors that didnt have this type of cards from previous videos ( sylvester s. arnold s. , harrison f. ant the rest of them) to be updated.
That's an excellent idea, @MihaiRiz1! Thank you! Also, I’m grateful for your feedback-it's great to know whether an update like this resonates with the audience.
Also you always read about hneetodays movies need to make not double but closer to 2.5x their budget to break even depending on the blockbuster sized scale of the production. Now i hear its over 2.5x. It would be interesting to have that info also if it's possible and not exceedingly difficult
That's true, @Moist369! I use that ratio when allocating the labels. It would make sense to include it too, but the cards are already sooo packed. I'll consider it-maybe test it and ask the community, as I did this time. 😉
Thank you for bringing this up, @patmacmanus! A 'Bomb' is when a movie earns less than its budget at the box office. A 'Flop' is when it earns less than 2x its budget at the box office. Why? Because box office earnings are split between the studio and the theaters, so a movie needs to earn more than twice its budget to actually turn a profit. I hope this clarifies things for you too, @steveleslie2170. I may have to find a way to highlight this in my videos. Thank you both for tuning in!
Could you please explain to me what a Flop or Bomb in a Movie, when the Movie is Profitable. With Michael there was at least 5 Movies that were Profitable but called a Bomb. Thanks
Thank you for bringing this up, @scottcleary4128! A 'Bomb' is when a movie earns less than its budget at the box office. A 'Flop' is when it earns less than 2x its budget at the box office. Why? Because box office earnings are split between the studio and the theaters, so a movie needs to earn more than twice its budget to actually turn a profit. I hope this clarifies. I may have to find a way to highlight this in my videos too. Thank you for tuning in!
I feel it’s a bit too much adding today’s numbers into the video. It’s a lot to digest. I think the speed is perfect and I wouldn’t change it. Thank you for today’s video.
Thank you for sharing that, @lloydg8324! Agreed, it's a double-edged sword. That's why I conducted a poll about this before actually making it happen. The feedback has generally been positive regarding this improvement, so maybe I'll stick with it for a while. We'll see in the long run. If you feel it's too much, maybe just concentrate on the figures you're more interested in. In my case, it's actually the adjusted values-it's easier for me to comprehend the magnitude of the sum than the original figures. Hope this helps, and thank you for tuning in! 😉
The format is great. Keep doing it. The salary "in 2024" numbers are appreciated!
Thank you, @ChadPrestonOfficialThree! I think I’ll stick with it, then. 😉
Love all that you have added
Glad to hear that, @rickhaun! It makes the production process more time-consuming, but if it improves the experience, it’s worth every minute of work. 😉
Yes, please continue with this new format
Thank you, @two-sml! It really means a lot to be reassured about improvements like these.
The adjusted amount is awesome = keep it! Where's the Steve McQueen video?
Thank you for reassuring me about the improvements, @Arzola7. Your feedback is truly valuable in cases like this. Steve is on the list, but it takes some time to get to him (others are already scheduled), so please bear with me. 😉
Converting it to 2024 money is appreciated. I'm a bit of a figure hound myself, often Googling those figures when it peaks my interest (as it so often does). However, while I'm actually very good at digesting information quickly, even I had to pause the video several times to read all the figures. Might I suggest you slow the crawl a little so I don't have to keep pausing.
Thank you, @FrancisXLord! I'm glad you like the improvements. Feedback like this really keeps me motivated. The crawl is already slightly slower compared to my previous non-inflation-adjusted videos, but I’ll definitely consider slowing it down even more-perhaps gradually, from one video to another, to find the sweet spot. In the meantime, consider using UA-cam's built-in playback speed options. Thank you again; your input is truly valuable to me. 🙂
You can adjust the speed yourself. There's a setting called "playback speed".
Love the improvements
Glad to hear that, @CeeJay591! I really appreciate your feedback. 😉
New additions to the format are great! You are the only one I trust with these stats despite others trying to copy. Unless they are on your channel, in my eyes, they don't exist! keep up the good work and btw Jack Lemon, Brad Pitt and Sean Connery?
Thank you, @Derek-vg3fg! Your words really mean a lot to me right now. I’ve also noticed some copycat channels, and it’s quite sad how they’re trying to turn my idea into a mass production of low-quality videos based on poor research. They clearly lack genuine enthusiasm and passion, yet they still manage to grab some views. Anyway, loyal viewers like yourself are truly priceless, and I hope people will notice the difference in quality and passion over time. Lemmon, Pitt, and Connery are all added to the list, and I will cover them all eventually. Thanks again for your support; it's much appreciated. 😉
That great! please keep on doing it
Thank you for reassuring me about this, @eranshalom! Much appreciated.
He is worth every penny. A great actor 😅
Since this is a stats video, then all those additional stats make a lot of sense to show us. Very helpful ty & GL
Thank you for reassuring me about this, @Moist369! Much appreciated!
These get better every week. Keep up the good work
Glad you like them, @40yearoldman! Your feedback truly keeps me motivated!
Love this new format! Thanks for putting in the work!
Glad to hear that, @authorjohnwquinn! Thank you for the reassuring me about this. It's crucial to know whether an update like this works or not.
Finally I would assume at some point you'd want to do directors as well like Nolan and Abrams and Spielberg etc...just to mix it up. Again good work and GL
Of course, I want to cover directors too, @Moist369! 😁 I think I'll start with Spielberg. It might take a couple of weeks, though, so bear with me.
I like the new format.
Thank you for reassuring me, @ttlayli! It's truly valuable to know whether a change like this resonates with the audience.
The additional charts and adjusted for inflation is much better.
keep it in
Thanks for confirming, @Balvenie9091!
I think its a good idea what u did with these cards. I think maybe in the future u should do videos like these from time to time with the actors that didnt have this type of cards from previous videos ( sylvester s. arnold s. , harrison f. ant the rest of them) to be updated.
That's an excellent idea, @MihaiRiz1! Thank you! Also, I’m grateful for your feedback-it's great to know whether an update like this resonates with the audience.
nice updates to your format, easier for dumb guys like me to comprehend ...great job!
Glad to hear you love them, @billverge7822! By the way, I think people who consume infographic content are far from being 'dumb.' 😉
I liked it !
Thank you, @yojimbodog!
Yes, it was good. Keep going
Thank you for reassuring me about this, @ollienilson1644! I really appreciate it.
Also you always read about hneetodays movies need to make not double but closer to 2.5x their budget to break even depending on the blockbuster sized scale of the production. Now i hear its over 2.5x. It would be interesting to have that info also if it's possible and not exceedingly difficult
That's true, @Moist369! I use that ratio when allocating the labels. It would make sense to include it too, but the cards are already sooo packed. I'll consider it-maybe test it and ask the community, as I did this time. 😉
Steven Segal, Sidney Poitier, Charles Bronson.
Poitier? We're kindred souls, @PUFFFIRE! His work and influence are amazing! Thank you for adding him to the list. 😉
I'm a little confused. What constitutes a flop, a bomb?
Yup, a 20 to 50 million dollar profit isn't a flop...I think a few were mistakes.
Thank you for bringing this up, @patmacmanus! A 'Bomb' is when a movie earns less than its budget at the box office. A 'Flop' is when it earns less than 2x its budget at the box office. Why? Because box office earnings are split between the studio and the theaters, so a movie needs to earn more than twice its budget to actually turn a profit. I hope this clarifies things for you too, @steveleslie2170. I may have to find a way to highlight this in my videos. Thank you both for tuning in!
THE STAR CHAMBER. A " bomb ". It was an absolutely awesome movie.
Could you please explain to me what a Flop or Bomb in a Movie, when the Movie is Profitable. With Michael there was at least 5 Movies that were Profitable but called a Bomb. Thanks
Thank you for bringing this up, @scottcleary4128! A 'Bomb' is when a movie earns less than its budget at the box office. A 'Flop' is when it earns less than 2x its budget at the box office. Why? Because box office earnings are split between the studio and the theaters, so a movie needs to earn more than twice its budget to actually turn a profit. I hope this clarifies. I may have to find a way to highlight this in my videos too. Thank you for tuning in!
Thanks for the Information 😊
You save us time with the salary adjustment to 2024.
Jake Gyllenhall. Steve Martin, Jeff Bridges
Nice picks, @piettefrank! And thank you for the feedback about the updates. Much appreciated.
Can we get Will Smith next please
He's coming in approx. 2 weeks, @himeclue32, so bear with me.
The new way much better😊
Glad to hear you like it, @valerieirvin4330! It's valuable to know whether an update like this resonates with the audience. Thank you. 😀
Do Dustin Hoffman
I will surely do, @Jhill057! Added to the list. 😉
Wow it looks like MD had a hard time picking hit movies unless it was a franchise in the 2000s
Adjusted for inflation is good but its too much info to view without stopping
Thank you for the feedback, @BLRayBanUK. Do you think slowing the crawl down a bit would enhance the experience?
@BoxOfficeJoe if you're gonna put that much info then absolutely yes :)
The Street of San Francisco series,how much he earn on that.
I feel it’s a bit too much adding today’s numbers into the video. It’s a lot to digest. I think the speed is perfect and I wouldn’t change it. Thank you for today’s video.
Thank you for sharing that, @lloydg8324! Agreed, it's a double-edged sword. That's why I conducted a poll about this before actually making it happen. The feedback has generally been positive regarding this improvement, so maybe I'll stick with it for a while. We'll see in the long run. If you feel it's too much, maybe just concentrate on the figures you're more interested in. In my case, it's actually the adjusted values-it's easier for me to comprehend the magnitude of the sum than the original figures. Hope this helps, and thank you for tuning in! 😉
JAMIE FOXX
On the list, @jklcomedyalonestarproducti3079! Thanks for tuning in!
CHRISTIAN BALE
JASON STATHAM
JEAN CLAUDE VAN DAMME
JIM CARREY
ROWAN ATKINSON
MICHAEL B.JORDAN
WESLEY SNIPES
PATRICK WILSON
Quite a list, @faiuzahmed1690! They're all great choices. I’m especially curious about Rowan Atkinson. 😉 Stay tuned-I’ll cover them all!
CHRISTIAN BALE
Thank you, @faiuzahmed1690! Noted.
Gene Hackman ....Robert Redford ?
Retro picks, @seawave34! Noted.
CHADWICK BOSEMAN
Another great pick, @jklcomedyalonestarproducti3079! Noted.