Penderecki Violin Concerto No.2 'Metamorphosen'
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
- K. Penderecki(con.) and Juyoung Baek(violin) perform Penderecki Violin Concerto No.2 'metamorphosen' with Korean Chamber Orchestra at Concert hall, Seoul Art Center, 18th December, 2013 under Seoul International Music Festival.
After listening of Violin Concerto once again I finally understood that Penderecki - R.I.P. - was a paramount genius of symphonic music, and a rare example of composer who could write incredibly for strings. There is no other alive.
Another great representative of modern classical music died. You have shaped modern music for a long time - thank you! March 29, 2020 / R.i.p.
RIP, K.Penderecki. Your amazing music will live on.........
Today we honor a real genius who touched our hearts immeasurably. A great loss, God bless him!
A sad, sad day, today. Glory to him. Thanks for every moment I spent listening to his fabulous music.
This was less contemporary, dissonant and mind-boggling than I expected! Kudos Monseiur Penderecki!
Penderecki will be played on my funeral. I love the timeless tune in it. My family hates it but will play it on my funeral
+Schloss Wendischbora because your family loves you:-)!
+Schloss Wendischbora Which Penderecki piece will they play? For a funeral, I recommend the Passacaglia from his 3rd Symphony (or the whole symphony!).
I'd like to have his Requiem played on my funeral, but ending funeral with Mahler's 9th, that'd be the best funeral ever, as encore I'd take Penderecki's Threnody over Hiroshimas Victims, just ro remind humanity not to have wars never again but embrace in eternal piece
in eternal peace
I feel like your gravestone will be the greatest challenge here .. you're gonna need a loads of room for all of those names
Rest in Peace Maestro Penderecki. I first heard Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima 45 years ago when I was 12. Life changing.
This is one of my favorite violin concertos. Right up there with the Berg.
R.I.P Penderecki.
RIP . His music is always very emotional which is a very important factor in good music.
His music is from the guts and it's deep. Never shallow.
We are lucky to have had him and that he rebuked serialism.
Serialism in my opinion is the negation of music.
Penderecki developed an absolutely original style of musical expression. His symphonies are fantastic. Utrenja has been the perfect musicality for me. Absolutely Brilliant!
Your music will remain forever
W przeszłości nie byłem fanem muzyki symfonicznej. Od niedawna zacząłem jej słuchać przez internet i słuchając tego utworu przeżywam to duchowo i psychiczne, można powiedzieć metafizycznie.
Does youtube translate? If so, how do I do it? Thanks.
32:15 i can feel that, very beautiful, very dark, very unique.
Amazing!! My baby loved this représentation.
WOW!!!!!! Talk about intensity!!! Just WOW
Pięknie i z wielkim uznaniem dla Mistrza.
I've listened to thisc5 or 6 times neoromantic in places but very German orchestration and enough tonalism that the emotions are recognizable. not as old fashioned as the many symphonies but of course it still ain't mono,Berio or Boulez . I like it more and more with each hearing . Woman is fabulous and as always he conducts as the composer should: he knows what he wants !
This is very old fashioned - old fashionedly dissonant, the soundtrack of a clichéd horror film. Whatever happened to beauty...
Piękny koncert.Dziękuję.
What I wouldn't do to see this performed live one day...
Amazing to hear the great man conducting!
You can´t hear it. He´s not wearing a microphone!
@@DeathRattlingWhore bruh you know what they mean, lol
Wspaniały utwór, doskonałe wykonanie, przerażająca orkiestra.......
A fantastic concerto: enchanting, odd, gloomy, explosive, serene, quirky, brilliant! Ju-young Baek, however, played even better in the recorded performance with the Royal Philharmonic under Nowak. Penderecki, of course, is the master creator, and kudos goes to him for all eternity for a marvelous work!
Amazing! Such great music!
Truly a master
Absolutely Brilliant!
Uno de los grandes del siglo 20 . Música contemporánea que se deja oír y disfrutar. Nos deja grandes obras. Paz en su tumba.
He doesn't look bad for 80.... I think the soloist did a good job too. Out of Penderecki's later music, for some reason I've always found this concerto quite difficult to engage with, but this recording has persuaded me it might be worth a listen from time to time.
Starts at 01:00 Stunning performance, thank you for sharing this.
Ayer tuvimos la oportunidad de ver al Maestro dirigiendo este concierto en el Auditorio de Ferrol con la Orquesta Joven de la OSG.
Un placer
Just heard Maestro conducted this yesterday in HK. A very beautiful piece and Prof Baek has a great performance!
Fascinating... the man himself...
Composição estranha e belíssima.... E Juyoung Baek é uma violinista excepcional.
This is over the top!!!
RIP Penderecki 🖤
That's the great man himself, conducting. Wonderful piece.
descansa em PAZ K.PENDERECKI
No conocía al señor, pero es excelente, vi un documental de grandes compositores y este es uno de ellos... genial concierto
Lamentablemente murió hoy...
This is the most enjoyable work from Penderecki I have heard yet. I have heard about three others over the years.
Juyoung is perfect!
Вы знаете, я обожаю характер этой музыки
Concerning anyone who decides to rudely insert their advertisement in the middle of a true piece of art, devoid of any aesthetic appreciation, I swear a blood oath that I will never buy your product, ever.
👏👏👏👏👏 for violinist!
Thank you.
mashaalla ... very nice
Muy buen concierto. Se agradece el upload!!!
A very great master-art performance of my favorite composer...
A remarkable performance of one of the major works of the recently deceased composer who appears in this video conducting his own work. The Korean Chamber orchestra looks like a full blown orchestra rather than a chamber one. Juyoung Baek appears secure and in complete control of this fiendishly difficult work. The concert follows the traditional structure even though the music is more contemporary. It is a work easy to lsten to, with nice moments and melodies.
nice
piekne piekne
music starts at 01:00
Muy buena interpretación.
Thanks a lot !
So gladI came back to this . This music full of ideas , intensity even in the old fashioned idiom it's still memorable ! Muller was right to champion him and Previn ! I must find the score ! 3:30 Allegro with astounding 3note motif put to good use ! 5:35 , 6:04 ,6:55 -7::00trills with wind scalar passages, the3note motif gets treatment full scale. More Star violinists should or will take this up . It's not as long as the Shostakovich as much as fun s either Bartok and not as oldfashioned as my fave Prokofiev .Not as new as WNton Marsalis gold Violin concero ro Bolcolm's or Jennifer Higdon or that wonderful english woman Bridget?
Came here because Sounds of Nightmare Machine. Expand your horizons 👍
wow
This music is more modern Shostakovich
It would not be a problem if it still were music.
There are some similarities and motives from Shostakovich cello concertos.
@@maniakdz how is this not music...
Он в итоге оказался для меня определяющим для моего творческого пути
i've always wondered about the laws of harmonic vibrations have over the laws of natural vibrations.
Нечего говорить, способ изложения уникальный,
с каждым годом, как вы думаете
Great music to have a panic attack to!
11:48 12:09
To ja już pozostanę przy Bachu i Biberze...
It's me or is it possible to recognize themes of Shostakovich's 1st cello concerto?
For example 6:30
atucsuc I agree with you
Agreed
In a general way, I do not understand at all the radical change of Penderecki from avant garde to neoromantism. This appears to me as unfruitful as Stravinski's neoclassicism or Richard Strauss' postromantism. Nevertheless, we must take the works as they are and acknowldge that this conceerto is very well written, a convincing piece of this surprising neoromantic evolution. Ac many of there reromntic/neoexpressionsis xeores, the worl is lon and; in my mind, is not contrasted enough to justify such a length. However, this strange set of works is quite lyrical, very well wtitten and will probabni remain a singuar time in the story o the music, just as for instance the neoc=lassic works of Stravinski, which we have the opportunity to hear from time to time.
From Wikipedia, Penderecki stated his reasons for his style change as follows (incidentally his later work is eclectic like Shostakovich):
Penderecki explained this shift by stating that he had come to feel that the experimentation of the avant-garde had gone too far from the expressive, non-formal qualities of Western music: 'The avant-garde gave one an illusion of universalism. The musical world of Stockhausen, Nono, Boulez and Cage was for us, the young - hemmed in by the aesthetics of socialist realism, then the official canon in our country - a liberation...I was quick to realise however, that this novelty, this experimentation and formal speculation, is more destructive than constructive; I realised the Utopian quality of its Promethean tone'. Penderecki concluded that he was 'saved from the avant-garde snare of formalism by a return to tradition'
After all the bag tricks you kind of want to go back to something that bleeds and reads like a coherent narrative.
The hell are you talking about? This just sounds like a boring horror film without any sense of melody!
This might be the most conventional piece from him I've heard thus far...or at least it seems so to me near the beginning, 3:30-ish, haha...
Извините, конечно, но Пендерецки , наше все
I don't understand. Why is this music so engaging and interesting? It feels like it has structure, like the parts relate and grow one from another. Does it have some harmonic framework that just wooshed over my head unheard? How can it seem all of a piece with so little connecting melody? I can tell it's not completely atonal but I have no knowledge of harmony to explain with. What sorcery is this?
Its called metamorphosis!
Koncert jubileuszowy Pendereckiego - zobaczcie materiał - ua-cam.com/video/bRrhysmkfwk/v-deo.html
"...after what seemed to them like a two hour ride down from the surface vessel on a frigid elevator, the deep submergence vessel was all the way down to 13,000 feet depth... the Abyssopelagic layer! The sonar officer on the surface ship asked them to switch on their powerful floodlight as they were approaching the area where surface sonar showed the megalithic ruins to be. So Jensen, the Norwegian pilot of the submersible switched on the floodlights and the deep ocean floor was illuminated before them. His French and Russian crewmates crowded up to the 5-inch-thick front porthole window for a look outside. At first, all they seemed to see were scalloped rocks all over and spindly black crabs here and there. The sonar officer radioed to them that they should be able to see it by now. 'You're only 50 meters from the northern wall. You should see it by now', he urged. So they looked out the window into the darkness ahead and saw that the floodlight did seem to be bouncing off a vertical upthrust. But upon closer inspection, it was no natural upthrust. There were what looked like ancient carvings all over this upthrust, which now seemed to soar upward. With the thrusters propelling it, the little deep diving sub ascended up along the wall to the top, a soaring 97 meters! and once at the top, they saw the wall was at least 30 meters thick and inlaid with an elaborate network of grooves and tracks! But the real shock came when they crested the inner edge of the wall and swooped down into the arena below! The structures they saw defied explanation. Who were the ancient builders and and did they build these ancient ruins and monolithic towers and... statues of what appeared to be ancient combatants with strange handweapons and even beasts with strange shapes! But the deepest mystery of all was the one unspoken: just how did the ancient ones build all these works of staggering archictecture... three miles down on the Atlantic seafloor?! It was the question none of them dared to whisper but hung in the air like a dense fog. And then the sonar indicated some really tall objects ahead so they pointed the floodlights ahead 27 degrees left and there they stood... the giant pillars... over 500 feet high, whose tops blossomed into sophisticated architecture of some mysterious purpose! "Who were they and why did they build this down here?" And the answer would be that they did not build it underwater. They built it in the of the flourishing of their violent preflood civilization and then the ocean came later, as a result of the great Flood which buried their mighty civilization in great judgment, hidden and put away from the eyes of the world above. Until now. Perhaps some terrifying secrets were better left... undisturbed!"
Christian e.g. Okay, I'm doing my very first Penderecki binge. First time I've gone more than one song in one sitting. And your comments about this lost city keep popping up. And yes, I keep reading them. And I'm not even sure if I'm doing so in the right order.
Please indulge me, sir, what are you doing? Honestly. Is this coming from a book? Is it real? Or has the music this genius wrote (the only thing that actually scares me to tears) caused you to blow a gasket and start either writing what is the deranged fiction of your innermost imagination, or divulge a great secret not one of us should ever know about?!!!! Or is it me?!!!!! Have I gone mad?!!!!!!!!!! Am I even reading this?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or has the darkened wall out there past the foot bed of my really come and swallowed me whole into this abyss "you have written about"?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why am I binging Penderecki?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eminently fair question. In fact i am writing a story about something that was discovered on Google Earth in 2009 on the Madeira Plain on the Atlantic seafloor that is about 80 by 108 miles in area, a clearly manmade ancient constrution, shaped like a grid pattern that the gov't is lying and saying is a "sonar blip" but bloggers are calling it "Atlantis" but i believe it to be an ancient preflood citg and i have listen to this cd of this concert for inspiration as i write the story because it so perfectly captures the scene, nothing more. i am unabpe to hear this without connecting it to that megalithic artifact but if someone else doesn't share my vision, feel free to disregard my comments
a hoax www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2096928/Google-Earth-removes-gridlike-pattern-sparked-lost-city-Atlantis-rumours-map.html
@@klassysax - Thanks for the link. I'm inclined to call it more of a mistake than a hoax, but it's good to have it cleared up.
굿
Clintton
Nono not mono
Извините, за присутствие
괜찮다.^^주영아
I think you're right 🤔
Regente......quem??? que pena!!!
Совсем охренели- в музыку вклинивать рекламу.
Маэстро!?, благодарочка, знаете, ваша техника изобрела ступенечку , для некоторых дурочечков, напланетных, "кроты подземные", не так ли
Why even bother tuning?
So that it doesn't end up sounding like something by Stockhausen I guess...
Jazgot
disturbing. Haha Gira, Galas, Burtner
Бред какой-то
There's absolutely nothing in this music. Complete lack of real talent
Right! Nothing except beauty and great emotion.
You have got any soul
@Jan Krendel There's lots in this music. You just don't hear it, which is fine. I have the same problem with Coltrane and Schoenberg, can't hear a thing in them. If you want a program to go with the music, all you have to do is scroll up and read Christian e.g. 's posts.
Maybe you regard incomprehensibility as a sign of quality. But the quality of a piece isn't proportional to how difficult it is to understand and follow. Rating as the best those pieces that are the most like random sounds, I suggest comes from a belief it'll be seen as proof of an outstanding mind. But beauty should be the thing, and if a piece is such that beauty is recognised the 1st time you hear something-while that may make it seem fair to try to disparage it as being "child's play"(in that it wasn't necessary to struggle for many listens in a quest to unearth the supposed quality-which often never materializes)-it also means it's at the top of greatness.
@@darrylschultz6479 You just described pop music - music that sounds great on the surface. Great music grows on you, IN you. The more you listen, the more you unwrap its beauty. Which is how we came to the term "difficult music." Many people dislike certain types of music because they have not or will not spend any time listening to them. The musical literacy of the general populace is at an all-time low.
Which is not to say that any music you like on first listen can't be great or has no hidden layers. To that I will simply point to Mozart.