It’s the 3rd Party e-mount glass from Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang and Tokina make Sony the hands down value leader. Compare the cost of a 3 or 4 lens package from Nikon or Canon against comparable e-mount options and the cost difference is staggering. What you can get for $3,000-$3500 from Tamron/Sigma for e-mount would cost upward of $8000 from Nikon or Canon. Buy the a7iii now, load up on e-mount glass and in 2021 the a7IV will leapfrog the R6/Z6 performance.
Even now during April 2024 I have bought this Sony A7iii with 28=70mm kit lens and Tamron 70-300 RXD iii lens and have found your comments are perfectly true and fitting. Thank you from India.
@@Life_Is_A... no it is in perfect condition like new with a 7$ tempered glass installed!! The camera performs amazing for being 4 years old and for 900$ used I don't think you can get anything better
@@donzokor5312 he's probably salty that even now, three years later he can't afford it. I've used a Canon and Nikon in the past and jumped to Sony. This is hands the BEST sub $2k FF camera.
I upgraded to the a7iii 2 years ago from the a7ii. ( main reasons 1. Battery life, 2. Auto tracking). This is a great camera and buying better glass is all you need
Bought a used A7ii a few months ago to decide whether I really wanted to go mirrorless. Fell in love with it immediately and after a couple weeks replaced the kit 28-70 with a Tamron 28-75. Followed that with Tamron 70-300 and 17-29. Super happy with this lens combo! Lightweight, inexpensive and amazing performance. All that said, I’m now getting ready to put the a7ii back on eBay and pick up an a7iii body. Wish I’d done that initially, but c’est la vie. After all of the amazing reviews and recent comparisons like this one, I have no question about my decision!
I have had my A7iii for over two years and it was and still is stunning, when released there was little on the market to compete, even today I see no reason to change. The regular firmware updates seem to keep the camera relevant. I also have a Sony A7Riv, which is also incredible, however, other than resolution, the A7iii is not far behind.
I can use this video to remind some peeps that regardless of the "flaws", this camera is the catalyst for the sub 2k full frame mirrorless goodness we can enjoy from all manufacturers today.. it's crazy that it's already 3 years..
The price is end of 2023 the same. Official sellers sell refurbished with guarantee for 1.150 - 1.300 Euro. Used private 1k. But I got one for 830euro with two batteries, original package. Only thing 50k shutters. People taking 10 pics per year but only buy Sony A7III with less than 10i shutters. 50k is nothing. One of my best buys 830 Euro for a mint condition A7III.
I was very lucky, my local camera store got this camera two weeks before official launch, so I could use it on an America trip with my old band. Felt in love immediately and that hasn't changed until this day. The a7III is a truly amazing camera and since you can get it for around 1500 Euros in Germany (original price was 2300) it is more than worth its money, no matter what the a7IV can do.
I have it for 2 years now. And I print a lot for my home walls. My sweet spot is at 70x100cm prints but I also made a three row panorama and is crisp sharp at 2x1 meters print ! I Just love this camera.
This camera is the reason I won't buy the R6. Although after 2 years I still don't like it as a camera, it is a fantasticly powerful tool that has made me a lot of money. The value is unbeatable.
I recently upgraded from the a7ii to the a7iii and I have to say I am really amazed by the a7iii. The autofocus is amazing and I mainly got it for the dual SD card slots and silent shutter. For the price you can't beat it. The a7c looks great but not having the dual SD is a deal breaker for me.
Worried it will be good but not a possible ~$1k more than the A7iii which can be had for as little as £1200 (recent blink and you miss it deal on Amazon recently).
@@daudabappa932 you don't just pay for improvements - you pay for future-proofing. If you plan on holding onto the camera for a few years, it's worth it to invest in the newer features, faster processor, better color science, superior autofocus, better LCD screen, a screen that flips out, an improved EVF, an improved sensor, possibly better ergonomics. You get those benefits every single time you shoot. So if you shoot 10 times a month, and you hold onto the camera for at least three years, that's at least 360 photography sessions that you will enjoy those benefits. That's worth $1,000 to me.
Definitely worth waiting for the A7IV. Even if someone were looking to invest in their first full frame camera, I would recommend the A7C. Not that the A7III is bad, far from it. It’s just that the A7C has newer features such as real time tracking, better AF, IBIS + Gyro and the flip out LCD screen. The A7IV will be a BEAST!
@@lacijunga Yes, due to the smaller body / weight. Nonetheless, the A7C records Gyro Data and the footage can be stabilized in post processing. I think the A7IV will hace the Active Image stabilization that the A7SIII has.
I think you should have mentioned the software, image edge, and desktop options. Additionally Sony has a ton of integrated options for recording audio, and flashes etc.
Good to read that. I was not sure about the a7iii vs the r6. Got the a7iii plus the Sony FE 35mm 1.8 and 3 extra years of sonys premium service. For 1800€ after cash back the decision wasn't that hard anymore.
@@Nearest_Neighbor as for me the dealbreaker was inbody image stabilization :) but I totally agree, Canon mirrorless is more expensive, especially their RF lineup, which is also quite limited to chose from.
Got the A7rii since launch.. until today still using that. I guess I'll only change when that finally give up on me. The A7iii/A9 AF already outclass A7rii by quite abit. Cant imagine the future.
@@andremifsud604 Hmm. If you consider a more overall and standard camera.. then a7iii is better. Since it AF faster and has 2 card slot. However.. if what you shoot dont move fast and you like to see more details in your photo.. then a7rii is better. Personally, I am not so concern over 1 or 2 card slot.. although many would say 1 card slot is a deal breaker. I have been shooting over 10 years.. I never had card failure before.. alas.. if shit want to happen.. it will happen..
I’ve had my a7iii since October 2018. I’m still loving all the features about the camera, as I’m shooting both photo and video equally. The battery life is amazing. One thing I’d wish the a7iii had is a quick charge option. Other than that I do agree the screen is a bit lacklustre, but with a recent addition on the atomos ninja v, it makes up for it to a certain degree. I cant wait to see what the a7iv will offer, and hopefully the upgraded features would justify upgrading the a7iii!
@@PTSOPHOTO yeah! Usually there’s websites that can track it, you’ll just need to take a picture on an as card, and drop that file onto the tracker, it Weill then read the file # and tell you what your camera shutter is at
Hi Dan, thank you for another great vídeo! Would you tell me how do you focus on that photos of the dancers in the rain and the cars in the desert ? I mostly shoot people but if they move a little faster, I lose the focus. If I ask a model to come towards me running or walking fast, the photos come out of focus. For this I use "Wide" with the face/eye tracking on. Would you tell me what focus settings you used in the photos I mentioned above, please? Thank you so much in advance!🙏
Appreciate that! So my bigger question is what lens are you using. The camera itself should be able to track in that setting but maybe your lens needs a faster focus motor. Wide with the face/eye tracking on is all perfect. You just need a lens with a fast AF motor and good communication with the camera
@@learningcameras Thank you so much for answering... I'm using a Sigma 85mm 1.4 DG DN. But, regardless of the lens you use, just out of curiosity, what settings did you use for this 2 situations, the dancers and the cars in the desert! TIA
I rented the a7c and I don’t think it is worth the price. Missing all the custom buttons and the grip is horrible. The camera all together feels very cheap
Got the Panasonic S5 over this for travel photography. That pixel shift mode might be handy for landscapes. The autofocus might not be the best in low light but is still an upgrade over DSLRs I used before. Paired with Sigma 24-70 2.8
@@learningcameras Perfect thanks for the feedback! So a buddy and I are going to share lenses and this is the lens that he actually already has;-) What would be your second lens choice with a little more zoom to compliment the A73? Thanks
I've been waiting to upgrade from my APS-C Sony A6500, which I purchased about 6 months before the Sony A7III was launched... to the Sony A7IV. Come on Sony 1st Quarter 2021?
You did an amazing job on this video! I have been scavenging a lot of the a good camera for my budget and this helped tremendously. The way to explain and give information without the viewer doing the research is top notch. Thank you so much!!
Right now the Sony A7III is one of the best for that although also because it's a little bit older, it doesn't have some of the latest video features. Also check out the Panasonic S1 which is great although autofocus in video can sometimes struggle
@@learningcameras I think I’ll go with the Sony a7iii I love your videos ! I’d to see how you edit your videos or photos . What software do you use ? Do you have a behind the scenes on the wedding videos you shoot . The lenses & settings for the camera . Great content thank you so much brother .
@@christopherg5147 So I use Premiere which I have a love/hate relationship with lol. I don't really have any BTS of the video stuff I do but I have gotten a bunch of requests recently so maybe it's time! Feel free to let me know if there is anything specific you want to see and I'll work on it. Thanks so much Christopher!!!
Still rocking my A7ii and I am so happy with it! Luckily I didn’t get a Canon or Nikon back then... I think getting nicer Glas is actually more important then a new camera ... .
Have one on order now. My first full frame camera. Looking forward to expanding the type of shots I may now be able to obtain, especially low light and Astro . Coming from a micro 4/3 system .
So Nikon has come through with countless promised updates including RAW video output over HDMI on the original Z6 which no one thought was possible so I believe them. Also, most of the cameras that can record full frame 4k60 (canon R6/R6) actually look better in APSC mode because the cameras have to pixel bin/line skip in full frame mode where APSC mode has a full pixel readout. So absolutely true however I personally don't have much of an issue with that
@@learningcameras z6II is oversampling from 6k to 4k at 24fps just like the a7III, there is no way the crop mode would be better than the 6k oversampled 4k, this is not 40+mpx sensor. The Raw option in the original Z6 is heavily line skipped with a ton of moire, detail loss and false color, nice option but not impressive at all, actually much worse than the internall oversampled 4k option.
It's only 4K60 because most cameras can't oversample 4K60...it simply requires too much processing so they either line skip or crop. I'm telling you as someone who has used cameras that do both, cropping is better. So until a camera can oversample 4K60 full frame, the crop mode always has more detail
Good morning Dan, I see that you already had the Sony a7III and now you have the a7IV. I want to buy a camera to start with leisure photography and I would like to know your opinion as to whether it is worth the difference in price from one to the other or whether I would be better served with the 7III. Thanks
I hope you don’t have any problems with it once it is out of warranty because Sony has gone up a lot on repair parts. I have a A7iii that developed a problem with the shutter blades and was quoted a repair cost of $175.00 for the part and $200.00 labor to repair it at my local camera shop that is a repair center. Two days later they called me and said Sony went up on the price of the shutter assembly to $350.00 for the part. They told me that a Sony wants people to buy the latest models and don’t want to support older cameras. Sony no longer supports the A6500 which is not that old.
If I was mainly shooting stills, I’d be picking up the A7RIII (which I did, then sold it, and I'll be buying another!). That camera is such fantastic value now; Only slightly more than the A7III, less than half the price of an R5, and 42MP is the sweet spot for me. Price vs features vs output vs native glass selection... It's awesome. Video-wise, the Lumix S5 is a great camera, too. Definitely worth a mention. Every modern camera is fantastic with almost identical output though. I’d choose based on the native glass for my needs.
hi im looking to purchase my first camera. I'm mainly going to use it for videos but I really want to use it for photos as well. I'm also familiar with cameras and am not shy to do some research and how to properly take advantage of them either. I'm having a hard time deciding between this or the A7C.
Couldn't justify the price of an R6. I bought an A7III with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8 lens brand new, and it was cheaper than the R6 body alone.. I use a Canon R5 at my workplace, and it's hard going to an A7III for personal/freelance work (Mainly the autofocus, I primarily do video work), but you just can't beat that value.
My a7siii is gonna be delivered today 😀 with the 16-35 gm, also gonna pick up the cheap Sony 85 1.8 and I’m thinking of adding a telephoto.. 70-300 tamron f4.5-6 what do you thin? I say 90% of my stuff will be shot with the 16-35 and I’ll probably be shooting 95% during day light so the f4 plus should be ok ?
Awesome!!! I'd look at the Tamron 70-180mm instead of the 70-300. I doubt you will need the extra reach, you can always crop in post, and the F2.8 aperture and quality of the 70-180 are better. Enjoy the SIII!!!
Not a pro but just a photography lover here...and I love my Sony a7iii, so thank you very much for this video, let's me know my money was well spent!!! Would you happen to know if there will be another firmware update in the near future to update some or any of the issues you spoke of? It's been awhile.
Awesome!!! So I really don't expect another big firmware update since there is likely an A7IV around the corner. I actually think they planned to release one this fall but delayed it
Your video was really beneficial. I'm interested in either purchasing the Sony A7iii w/ an FE 28-70 mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Lens OR a Nikon Z6ii w/ a NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S. I will be primarily shooting photography but also dabbling in cinematography. I'm concerned (based on my research) that the Sony isn't as durable as the Nikon and won't be able to hold up or handle the elements as well. I live in the Northeast, so some of the best photos will take me to cold (and potentially wet) locations. If I'm overthinking it and the Nikon's rougher/grippier looking "weather proof" exterior is just a facade, please tell me. Likewise, I keep hearing videographers praise the Sony over the Nikon, but then hear a decent number of photographers brag about the colors of Nikon over Sony. I'm trying to ease back into photography, but want to invest in an ecosystem that I see myself using ten years down the line (really want to avoid buying glass and then switching to a competitor later). This will be my first time shooting w/ more than my phone in almost 6 years. I first learned on an old 35mm film Canon, and later my Canon EOS 550D. Looking forward to making the jump into mirrorless FF camera. Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Awesome! So I'd agree that the Nikon Z6II is built more rugged (not that the A7III will have an issue...no clue) and in most areas, the Z6II does come out a little ahead of the A7III. Sony took video to a new level with the A7III hence why so many use and rave about it but since then Nikon has caught up with the A7III. In Sony's defense though, the A7IV is definitely an improvement to both the Z6II and A7III it's just that it also happens to be $500 more. I will also say that Sony's ecosystem is better than Nikon at the moment and probably will maintain that so keep that in mind. If you really want the best of the best for years to come, consider saving for the A7IV otherwise between the A7III and Z6II, the Nikon wins with video, colors, and ruggedness while the A7III wins with autofocus and ecosystem. Overall Image quality is pretty similar on both. Either camera will be a huge update from the 550D though!
I'd absolutely love to get my hands on one to start my own business! Losing your business because of covid sucks but I definitely see that as a sign to start a new chapter in my life and photography has always been a passion of mine! :) Love the review, you've inspired me Dan!
Definitely an opportunity to start a new chapter! Covid was pretty rough to photography too though. Most of my time pre covid was spent shooting weddings which were ALL canceled as were my travel plans and thus a bunch of sponsored videos. The nice thing about doing your own thing is that you are free to adapt and find new areas to thrive in so stay inspired and coming up with new idea!
I have 5dmk2 too and I want to upgrade to a7r3, a7 3 or R6. Are you happy with a7iii? Do you think a7r3 would be better choice? I will use ef lenses with Sigma mc-11.
@@mordavian I'm happy with the A7III, yeah. I take a LOT of photos since I shoot some events, and in my own time do street and portraits, so for me the amount of time I spend editing RAW files is a huge issue. So that's why I didn't want the extra resolution of the A7RIII--it would fill up too much hard drive space and slow down editing. I considered going for Canon too... but the Sony has a lot of lens options that are cheaper right now, like good Sigma options. And when I was shooting DSLR I never felt like Canon was so kind to their customers. Plus, Sony still does have more leeway with their RAW files, which is important to me. I like being able to brighten the shadows significantly if I need to.
(My current lenses are the Sigma 24-70 2.8 and Sigma 85mm 1.4 new version. I plan to get the Sony 35mm 1.4 G-Master and Sigma 14-24 2.8 as my next two lenses.)
@@Tzadeck thank you for your answer. I don't have a plan to replace my lenses yet. I have ef 70-200 ii, 100L, 85L and Sigma 50 art. I had a6300 few years ago and I used it with the same lenses as a second cam. I was happy because it was small but I did not like ISO performance and I sold. I used it with Sigma mc-11. Focusing was not accurate and not so fast. If I return to Sony now I will face the same situation but I need some extra megapixels, ibis and ISO performance. R6 has wonderful specs but the biggest issue is its low mp value. My 5dm2 is already 21mp. I don't want to pay nearly $3000 and have 20 mp's although it has 4k60fps, 1dxm3 sensor and lots of other new features. I am really confused. I don't want to select eos r because of 30 mp either. A7r3 has 3 year old sensor but I will not be able to use it at maximum capacity with ef lenses.
Hey Dan, I've spent weeks debating what Sony is right for me I want to shoot quality video occasionally and also take photos more of a hybrid and it seems in the Sony line the A7III is still the best for both. Thoughts? Should i wait for the A7IV?
Have you tried Leeming LUT? It balances the Sony colors really well and makes them much easier to work with. Not the same as Fuji but way better than stock Sony
Nice and timely review. How do we access the menu item descriptions that begin at 6:32? I have this camera and the a7r IV. I am a stills amateur shooter and use the a7III often. I keep the 55mm Zeiss f1.8 sonnar lens on it practically permanently.
As someone who shoots more video, and isn't quite invested in any system... It's a little tough. The A7C's awesome touch tracking features, smaller footprint for gimbal work is nice. But in the end it's still 8 bit colour. The GH5 though, has everything else except autofocus and low-light performance. R6 is totally out of the question. Anything that has a chance of overheating can't be used. Z6ii looks good, but not enough 3rd party lenses for budget options. S1 was a little appealing to me, but the L-mount is the absolute worst out of all full frame mounts currently and I'm not sure if I should even invest into it yet. hmmm........
Hahaha, I'm with you. There are definitely some cons with most of the $2000 systems out there right now. The A7SIII fixes all of that but it costs a bit more
Hey I was thinking to buy a7iii but as of now it is 2 yr old camera and still best ......but I am having a trouble to make choice that should I wait for Sony a7iv because it may be coming soon....what are your thoughts on it. Help me on it😊
So torn on whether to pick one up or hope for some improvements in the a7iv, seems there is no way they don’t incorporate at least some of these enhancements into a newer model.
It looks like they delayed the A7IV so I doubt we will see one now for at least 3-6 months so keep that in mind. I'd say if you are a photo shooter, jump on this deal right now. If you are a video shooter that's where most of the potential improvements in an A7IV will be seen
@@learningcameras thank you sir. Obviously like most we just want it all. It could give you a handy with three fingers and someone would still say wish it used 4
@@learningcameras Must be something serious going on inside Sony, because they know full well that the longer they delay the A7IV, the more out-of-date it'll be on arrival.
If you're a beginner man, this is perfect for it. I've had it for a while now, and it's very reliable. Amazing colors, stability, especially with a Gimbal, plus amazing AF! The AF is incredible on top of low light, for football shots. It's really good. Especially for beginners.
Definitely this or an a a7riii they can be found relatively cheap! The a7c is smaller, and doesn’t have as many custom buttons, but it’s autofocus is slightly better than the a7iii
I was considering picking this camera up for a start up UA-cam channel, but also for taking underwater stills with an ikelite case. Would you recommend any other cameras to look at for those two vastly different goals?
So this camera would be the best if you wanted to accomplish both of those with one camera. But if one of those needs is more important than the other, let me know! The A7c would be better for UA-cam but it's new and I'm not sure if they have underwater cases
Hey, I want to upgrade my gear and looking to get a new camera. I mainly focus on wildlife photography for the new camera. My old camera is a Nikon D5300. I want to update to a full-frame. The 3 main things are weight, price, and lenses availablety. Do you have any recommendations? I was thinking Sony A7III or nikonZ6?
Hi Dan, if you were to choose between a used A7 III, Canon R7 or R6. Which would you choose. It's just for hobby macro, wildlife family. I own a A7r II but it's AF is to slow and the battery life sucks. Hope you can help me out. Keep up the good work 👍
Hey. The A7III is still pretty solid for photos but when it comes to video, the R6 is much better and even the R7 too would be a better choice. So if you ONLY shoot photos, I'd say the A7III or R6 but if you also shoot video, the R6 would be my top choice. The problem with the R7 is Canon doesn't have any good APSC lenses so you really need full frame lenses so you might as well save up and get a full frame camera
Thanks for your advise Dan, appreciate it. I'm (not yet) into video. Eventhough it looks if I'm the only one these days 😂 The Canons appear to me because of their focus tracking. It'l come down to the R6 or 7. Greetz from the Netherlands
Hi im looking for an upgade from my nikon crop sensor to mirror less , my only use will be taking portraits and wedding pics, how good is a7iii when it comes to taking portraits, group pics wedding pics, please update
Hey awesome video... I'm currently looking and its really difficult. I've a budget of about 2k € and this needs to include a camera + a good lense for product photography and life style shots. I've been looking at the sony a7iii, z6, eos rp, eosr. What would you go with? Wish you the best, Seb
and here is the question ..sony a7iii or fuji xt4 mostly for video ???? the only think that hold me back fro the xt4 is the AF issues >>> what do you thin ?? thank you
So the video features on the XT4 were awesome but I did have some AF issues which I outlined in my review and functionality wise, it just wasn't amazing for video. But, it does have the 4k60 advantage so tough call!
Dan great video. I think it is time to trade-up to mirrorless camera. My son's wedding is coming up and I feel it is right time to trade in my entry DSRL for mirrorless. I am currently a Nikon owner and comparing the Sony A7iii over the Z6 or Z6ii. The main reason is the price, I think it is the right time. I know that there will be learn curve, but I think the Sony A7iii is worth the experience. Am I right? or Should stay with Nikon? I am retire person and can't buy a new mirrorless camera every time some new comes out. The Honda Civic I have is 13 years old and have over 210,000 miles on. Your input will be appreciated.
Dan, I'm thinking about getting a Sony RX10 IV, but it has the low light, dynamic range, sharpness and DOF limitations compared to the A7 III. Is there any software out there that can simulate or select depth of field in post production (or in camera)? If a small sensor has a wide DOF, isn't it easier to defocus part of the frame later than to sharpen? Also, how do you rate the RX10 IV (if at all) in comparison to the A7 III in terms of color, color depth, dynamic range, detail and DOF. Thanks for any answers to these questions.
Hey! So I believe the new Luminar NEO (coming in February) will have shallow DOF simulations to make it seem more like a full frame camera. The RX10 definitely doesn't touch the A7III when the A7III is paired with an amazing wide aperture lens. Where the RX10 advantage comes in is compared to the A7III with a basic kit lens. And while the A7III will still be better, the RX will be close enough in quality to the A7III/Kit lens especially at lower ISO in decent light and at a much lower price than the A7III. But if you to add a $5000 in lenses to the A7III to buy a 24-70 and 70-200 F2.8, the A7III would be a noticeable improvement to all areas of image quality, build, and features.
Is it normal to get a bit of delay or lag when viewing photos on Sony A7iii ? I’m concerned something might be wrong and don’t want to sell me camera if there is an issue. Some photos change instantly when using the wheel to scroll through photos but then sometimes it will just delay 5-10 seconds before changing , as if the memory is struggling or something
Check out this comparison to help you a bit better but a tough choice: ua-cam.com/video/x3iSr7sYdtI/v-deo.html The A7C does come with some free extras now though: bhpho.to/30uYprD
I'm contemplating buying the a7iii as I'm creating online courses, will be doing video logs, travel logs, and enjoy photography. I can pick it up for less than 2k second hand and I might have an interesting deal. Though, the a7c tends to be a few hundred more at this point, I'm not sure its worth the 300-400 more. I'd rather put that in a lense instead ...
So worth it is tough to define but I'll give you a few examples. Typically creating an online course might require filming for more than 30 minutes. It's horrible to be done with your filming only to find out that the camera stopped recording half way though because you went over the 30 minute limit the A7III had. Also, having a flip screen allows you to identify some potential issues like non recording or potentially out of focus problems. The A7c does have eye AF during video which the A7III doesn't have which could come in handy. Stuff like that! Non of them are quality upgrades but it certainly could help with online courses and vlogs
I have a question does the camera oversample from 6k in crop mode as well, or is it only in Full frame? I'm asking because I have some crop lenses and obviously it will compromise some pixels in photo mode, but was wondering if there is any quality loos in video mode when used with crop lenses since 4k only requires 8mpx.
So no, in the crop mode it only has a smaller area of the sensor it can use so it can't sample from 6k. However it does a full pixel readout in 4k so still great quality...but with less sensor area there is also a small reduction in low light performance and potentially dynamic range in the crop mode
I currently own a7ii and I have been waiting for a7iv. Earlier I thought that a7iv would come out in 2020 but now it seems like probably Q3 of 2021...I started doing paid jobs several months ago. Even though I got nice photos and my clients were satisfied with them, there were also some frustrating moments with my a7ii. I was really looking forward to a7iv but since a7iv won't come out any time soon, now I am trying to decide what to do. An important photoshoot is coming up soon and I even thought about getting an used a7iii while waiting for a7iv. Having two cameras would be also beneficial for occasions like wedding. Or should I just keep using a7ii hoping for a7iv to come out this Fall...
So the A7III isn't really a big update for photo quality...it's more about the hardware/features/video. So I'm all for getting a used A7III but if image quality is your concern, don't update just for that
Thanks! It does have weather sealing so it will be decent in those conditions. I believe the bottom of the camera is the most vulnerable. It's not the most weatherized rugged body in the world but it does have seals in most areas
Dan: Thanks for this informative review. I'm considering buying a Sony A7III but I may want to buy a newer Sony model. What is a comparable Sony full-frame mirrorless that was released after this camera? I mainly take photos of cityscapes, architecture, landscapes, street and candids. Thank you!
Im looking to buy the A7iii mainly for music videos, but also to take fast, quality photos.. you mentioned the a7c and the z6ii. I was looking at the Z7, but would like a price range under 2000. any suggestions?
So the A7c has better video with improved AF, unlimited recording, and a flip screen so I tend to prefer it to the A7III for video. The Z6ii is way better than the Z7 for video and even has a few advantages to the Sony so one of those two would be the best!
Who thinks the A7III is still worth picking up???
Also, just found this deal with like $100's of free gear with an A7III: adorama.rfvk.net/dX1G3
Keep it up good work sir
sony a7iii or e-m1 mark ii?
Definitely the A7III because of the larger sensor. Huge difference in low light performance and the A7III has better AF
@@learningcameras hmm if you can buy e-m1 mark with 12-40 pro for 1200 Euro vs only body a7iii for 1400 euro? Which camera would you choose
@@yesmanyesmanyes Thank you for the quick reply
It’s the 3rd Party e-mount glass from Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang and Tokina make Sony the hands down value leader. Compare the cost of a 3 or 4 lens package from Nikon or Canon against comparable e-mount options and the cost difference is staggering. What you can get for $3,000-$3500 from Tamron/Sigma for e-mount would cost upward of $8000 from Nikon or Canon. Buy the a7iii now, load up on e-mount glass and in 2021 the a7IV will leapfrog the R6/Z6 performance.
@Gabriel Rafi Just search for Tamron e mount lenses. Some of the best quality for the price.
@Gabriel Rafi chick tamron 24-75 it will be good start and also sony 90mm it will take you to expert level
What about the Apsc
Even now during April 2024 I have bought this Sony A7iii with 28=70mm kit lens and Tamron 70-300 RXD iii lens and have found your comments are perfectly true and fitting. Thank you from India.
best camera of the decade and will be relevant for 5 ore years!!!still using the a7rii with amazing resukts as well!
100% not true.
How's the screen treating you on that a7rii. Did it come off yet.
@@Life_Is_A... no it is in perfect condition like new with a 7$ tempered glass installed!! The camera performs amazing for being 4 years old and for 900$ used I don't think you can get anything better
@@Life_Is_A... oh quit it! did it come off yet LMAO....I own 2 of them with over 100,000 pics on each and not one single issue....
@@donzokor5312 he's probably salty that even now, three years later he can't afford it. I've used a Canon and Nikon in the past and jumped to Sony. This is hands the BEST sub $2k FF camera.
I upgraded to the a7iii 2 years ago from the a7ii. ( main reasons 1. Battery life, 2. Auto tracking). This is a great camera and buying better glass is all you need
Bought a used A7ii a few months ago to decide whether I really wanted to go mirrorless. Fell in love with it immediately and after a couple weeks replaced the kit 28-70 with a Tamron 28-75. Followed that with Tamron 70-300 and 17-29. Super happy with this lens combo! Lightweight, inexpensive and amazing performance. All that said, I’m now getting ready to put the a7ii back on eBay and pick up an a7iii body. Wish I’d done that initially, but c’est la vie. After all of the amazing reviews and recent comparisons like this one, I have no question about my decision!
I have had my A7iii for over two years and it was and still is stunning, when released there was little on the market to compete, even today I see no reason to change. The regular firmware updates seem to keep the camera relevant. I also have a Sony A7Riv, which is also incredible, however, other than resolution, the A7iii is not far behind.
I can use this video to remind some peeps that regardless of the "flaws", this camera is the catalyst for the sub 2k full frame mirrorless goodness we can enjoy from all manufacturers today.. it's crazy that it's already 3 years..
I can't believe it has been 3 years already..
Yeah, feels like I bought my a6500 last week but it's 2 years already
That’s because it hasn’t been. It launched April 2018.
It doesn’t seem like 3yrs cuz 2020 was a throw away year lol
@ when is almost 6 months considered close to the next year lol
@ Alright 5 months, my bad
The price is end of 2023 the same. Official sellers sell refurbished with guarantee for 1.150 - 1.300 Euro. Used private 1k. But I got one for 830euro with two batteries, original package. Only thing 50k shutters. People taking 10 pics per year but only buy Sony A7III with less than 10i shutters. 50k is nothing. One of my best buys 830 Euro for a mint condition A7III.
I switched from Nikon to Sony about 2 years ago, I have the a7iii and a7Riii. Both are amazing cameras.
Which do you like more?
@@1durch0 Sony way better auto focus, lens are super sharp too.
Thanks, and which of these two Sony’s 😁
@@1durch0 whichever you’re budget Allows
A73 or z6 ?
Most seamless transition into an ad I've ever seen. Well played.
I found it extremely annoying, i don't know why but i find it hard to trust him now after that stupid move.
I baught this masterpiece last year and still enjoying shooting with it :)
how's it for photography?
@@FrancoEnElMedio Really Awesome ! 😍🙌
I was very lucky, my local camera store got this camera two weeks before official launch, so I could use it on an America trip with my old band. Felt in love immediately and that hasn't changed until this day. The a7III is a truly amazing camera and since you can get it for around 1500 Euros in Germany (original price was 2300) it is more than worth its money, no matter what the a7IV can do.
I have it for 2 years now. And I print a lot for my home walls. My sweet spot is at 70x100cm prints but I also made a three row panorama and is crisp sharp at 2x1 meters print ! I Just love this camera.
Just went from cropped sensor to full frame. I purchased a7iii and so far sooo great.
Waiting for sony to launch A7iv so that i can buy A7iii (used) at very low price :p
I just bought one for $1200!
@@luisvdesign where did you buy it from?
@@luisvdesign second hand?
same here!!
I got one for 1000 at b&h. I seen it n I grab it real quick. The lowest I've ever seen for on that site
This camera is the reason I won't buy the R6. Although after 2 years I still don't like it as a camera, it is a fantasticly powerful tool that has made me a lot of money. The value is unbeatable.
I recently upgraded from the a7ii to the a7iii and I have to say I am really amazed by the a7iii. The autofocus is amazing and I mainly got it for the dual SD card slots and silent shutter. For the price you can't beat it. The a7c looks great but not having the dual SD is a deal breaker for me.
Have you noticed a reddish tint of the lcd main screen in a7 III? It drives me crazy that, A7 II does not have it
@@jankosiek I havent noticed that
i would seriously recommend ANYONE looking for an amazing photography/video camera to buy this, especially since it’s on sale right now
I'm looking to pick it up soon to replace my Canon T8I, do you know a good place to pick it up on sale again?
@@ripvanwinkle1854 nope not right now. but maybe around the fall/winter it’ll go on sale at B&H
@@westernpigeon I’ll have to keep an eye out I guess
Just knowing the A7IV is around the corner makes me wanna wait for those updates.
Worried it will be good but not a possible ~$1k more than the A7iii which can be had for as little as £1200 (recent blink and you miss it deal on Amazon recently).
@@daudabappa932 you don't just pay for improvements - you pay for future-proofing. If you plan on holding onto the camera for a few years, it's worth it to invest in the newer features, faster processor, better color science, superior autofocus, better LCD screen, a screen that flips out, an improved EVF, an improved sensor, possibly better ergonomics. You get those benefits every single time you shoot. So if you shoot 10 times a month, and you hold onto the camera for at least three years, that's at least 360 photography sessions that you will enjoy those benefits. That's worth $1,000 to me.
Definitely worth waiting for the A7IV. Even if someone were looking to invest in their first full frame camera, I would recommend the A7C. Not that the A7III is bad, far from it. It’s just that the A7C has newer features such as real time tracking, better AF, IBIS + Gyro and the flip out LCD screen. The A7IV will be a BEAST!
@@alvarolachner you're right but actualy a7iii has better IBIS
@@lacijunga Yes, due to the smaller body / weight. Nonetheless, the A7C records Gyro Data and the footage can be stabilized in post processing. I think the A7IV will hace the Active Image stabilization that the A7SIII has.
Just purchased, absolutely loving it so far!!
same
And you will love it indefinetly
I think you should have mentioned the software, image edge, and desktop options. Additionally Sony has a ton of integrated options for recording audio, and flashes etc.
I recently switched from Canon system to Sony and the camera I got was a7 III. Worth it ✊
Good to read that. I was not sure about the a7iii vs the r6. Got the a7iii plus the Sony FE 35mm 1.8 and 3 extra years of sonys premium service. For 1800€ after cash back the decision wasn't that hard anymore.
@@Nearest_Neighbor as for me the dealbreaker was inbody image stabilization :) but I totally agree, Canon mirrorless is more expensive, especially their RF lineup, which is also quite limited to chose from.
Just got it within the month, can see myself not chasing any anytime soon!
Just purchased mine today and downloaded your manual. Can't wait to see what type of shots and videos I produce with this camera!
Awesome!!! Hope it works out amazing
I don't know anything about cameras, but I am more into making video Your a real professional bro nice work
Got the A7rii since launch.. until today still using that.
I guess I'll only change when that finally give up on me. The A7iii/A9 AF already outclass A7rii by quite abit. Cant imagine the future.
Do you think the 500 euro difference between the Rii and iii is worth saving up? Purely stills
@@andremifsud604 Hmm. If you consider a more overall and standard camera.. then a7iii is better. Since it AF faster and has 2 card slot. However.. if what you shoot dont move fast and you like to see more details in your photo.. then a7rii is better.
Personally, I am not so concern over 1 or 2 card slot.. although many would say 1 card slot is a deal breaker. I have been shooting over 10 years.. I never had card failure before.. alas.. if shit want to happen.. it will happen..
Quick resume: it's still worth it! It's a great hybrid camera, go get it now!
Very nice 3 years later review! Thank you.
Nikon user here but have to give it a like 😀.”Clean” and accurate review,quite refreshing these days 👍
I appreciate that!
I’ve had mine over 2 years. So many photo shoots and wedding films... and it’s never failed me once.
I’ve had my a7iii since October 2018. I’m still loving all the features about the camera, as I’m shooting both photo and video equally. The battery life is amazing. One thing I’d wish the a7iii had is a quick charge option. Other than that I do agree the screen is a bit lacklustre, but with a recent addition on the atomos ninja v, it makes up for it to a certain degree. I cant wait to see what the a7iv will offer, and hopefully the upgraded features would justify upgrading the a7iii!
Have you had any issues with the shutter? In other words have you passed the estimated 200,000 shutter count on the a7iii
@@adrianalcaraz6469 hmm I’m not too sure. Any idea how I can find out the shutter count?
@@PTSOPHOTO yeah! Usually there’s websites that can track it, you’ll just need to take a picture on an as card, and drop that file onto the tracker, it Weill then read the file # and tell you what your camera shutter is at
Hi Dan, thank you for another great vídeo! Would you tell me how do you focus on that photos of the dancers in the rain and the cars in the desert ? I mostly shoot people but if they move a little faster, I lose the focus. If I ask a model to come towards me running or walking fast, the photos come out of focus. For this I use "Wide" with the face/eye tracking on. Would you tell me what focus settings you used in the photos I mentioned above, please? Thank you so much in advance!🙏
Appreciate that! So my bigger question is what lens are you using. The camera itself should be able to track in that setting but maybe your lens needs a faster focus motor. Wide with the face/eye tracking on is all perfect. You just need a lens with a fast AF motor and good communication with the camera
@@learningcameras Thank you so much for answering... I'm using a Sigma 85mm 1.4 DG DN. But, regardless of the lens you use, just out of curiosity, what settings did you use for this 2 situations, the dancers and the cars in the desert! TIA
I rented the a7c and I don’t think it is worth the price. Missing all the custom buttons and the grip is horrible. The camera all together feels very cheap
Got the Panasonic S5 over this for travel photography. That pixel shift mode might be handy for landscapes. The autofocus might not be the best in low light but is still an upgrade over DSLRs I used before. Paired with Sigma 24-70 2.8
I have to say, Sony’s really hold up well over time. I’m still using my a7 as a point and shoot.
That flex haha
Yup. Same here!
The 7 IV will be my last camera if it comes with the new touch menu and high resolution screen!
Hi Dan, what lens would best suit this camera? I am looking for a sort of all rounder lens to do it all:-) thanks
This is definitely the first lens I would buy: bhpho.to/3yFYDwl
@@learningcameras Perfect thanks for the feedback! So a buddy and I are going to share lenses and this is the lens that he actually already has;-) What would be your second lens choice with a little more zoom to compliment the A73? Thanks
A 70-200 or the 85mm F1.8 is a good 2nd option. Depending on your budget
I've been waiting to upgrade from my APS-C Sony A6500, which I purchased about 6 months before the Sony A7III was launched... to the Sony A7IV. Come on Sony 1st Quarter 2021?
You did an amazing job on this video! I have been scavenging a lot of the a good camera for my budget and this helped tremendously. The way to explain and give information without the viewer doing the research is top notch. Thank you so much!!
Thanks so much!!! So glad it helped
I’m in the market to buy a camera to do some wedding events , personal client work ,some photography but 70 video 30 photos recommend a73 or a73
Right now the Sony A7III is one of the best for that although also because it's a little bit older, it doesn't have some of the latest video features. Also check out the Panasonic S1 which is great although autofocus in video can sometimes struggle
@@learningcameras I think I’ll go with the Sony a7iii
I love your videos ! I’d to see how you edit your videos or photos . What software do you use ?
Do you have a behind the scenes on the wedding videos you shoot . The lenses & settings for the camera . Great content thank you so much brother .
@@christopherg5147 So I use Premiere which I have a love/hate relationship with lol. I don't really have any BTS of the video stuff I do but I have gotten a bunch of requests recently so maybe it's time! Feel free to let me know if there is anything specific you want to see and I'll work on it. Thanks so much Christopher!!!
I love my A7iii, I use a tamron 28-75 and a sigma 100-400. I only need it for stills and don’t do any video so it suits my needs to a tee
Still rocking my A7ii and I am so happy with it! Luckily I didn’t get a Canon or Nikon back then...
I think getting nicer Glas is actually more important then a new camera ... .
Have one on order now. My first full frame camera. Looking forward to expanding the type of shots I may now be able to obtain, especially low light and Astro . Coming from a micro 4/3 system .
That intro though 😍🔥
Is it 4k?
Nikon Z6II can't record in 4k60, nikon only promised this in future firmware update but it will be only avaible in super35 (aps-c) crop
So Nikon has come through with countless promised updates including RAW video output over HDMI on the original Z6 which no one thought was possible so I believe them. Also, most of the cameras that can record full frame 4k60 (canon R6/R6) actually look better in APSC mode because the cameras have to pixel bin/line skip in full frame mode where APSC mode has a full pixel readout. So absolutely true however I personally don't have much of an issue with that
@@learningcameras z6II is oversampling from 6k to 4k at 24fps just like the a7III, there is no way the crop mode would be better than the 6k oversampled 4k, this is not 40+mpx sensor. The Raw option in the original Z6 is heavily line skipped with a ton of moire, detail loss and false color, nice option but not impressive at all, actually much worse than the internall oversampled 4k option.
It's only 4K60 because most cameras can't oversample 4K60...it simply requires too much processing so they either line skip or crop. I'm telling you as someone who has used cameras that do both, cropping is better. So until a camera can oversample 4K60 full frame, the crop mode always has more detail
Good morning Dan,
I see that you already had the Sony a7III and now you have the a7IV.
I want to buy a camera to start with leisure photography and I would like to know your opinion as to whether it is worth the difference in price from one to the other or whether I would be better served with the 7III.
Thanks
Sorry for the late reply! The A7III is absolutely fine unless you shoot video, then the upgrades on the A7IV are WELL worth it
love the review! recently bought one. best investment ever
Awesome!!! Yeah, hard to regret picking this up!
I hope you don’t have any problems with it once it is out of warranty because Sony has gone up a lot on repair parts. I have a A7iii that developed a problem with the shutter blades and was quoted a repair cost of $175.00 for the part and $200.00 labor to repair it at my local camera shop that is a repair center. Two days later they called me and said Sony went up on the price of the shutter assembly to $350.00 for the part. They told me that a Sony wants people to buy the latest models and don’t want to support older cameras. Sony no longer supports the A6500 which is not that old.
I wouldn’t recommend anyone getting this camera. Sony has gone up significantly on repair parts and they will probably release the A7IV early in 2021.
@@The_Essential_Light how early do you anticipate the 7iv
@@bubbachunky9 I would expect it by March of 2021
If I was mainly shooting stills, I’d be picking up the A7RIII (which I did, then sold it, and I'll be buying another!). That camera is such fantastic value now; Only slightly more than the A7III, less than half the price of an R5, and 42MP is the sweet spot for me.
Price vs features vs output vs native glass selection... It's awesome.
Video-wise, the Lumix S5 is a great camera, too.
Definitely worth a mention.
Every modern camera is fantastic with almost identical output though. I’d choose based on the native glass for my needs.
hi im looking to purchase my first camera. I'm mainly going to use it for videos but I really want to use it for photos as well. I'm also familiar with cameras and am not shy to do some research and how to properly take advantage of them either. I'm having a hard time deciding between this or the A7C.
Couldn't justify the price of an R6. I bought an A7III with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8 lens brand new, and it was cheaper than the R6 body alone.. I use a Canon R5 at my workplace, and it's hard going to an A7III for personal/freelance work (Mainly the autofocus, I primarily do video work), but you just can't beat that value.
My a7siii is gonna be delivered today 😀 with the 16-35 gm, also gonna pick up the cheap Sony 85 1.8 and I’m thinking of adding a telephoto.. 70-300 tamron f4.5-6 what do you thin? I say 90% of my stuff will be shot with the 16-35 and I’ll probably be shooting 95% during day light so the f4 plus should be ok ?
Awesome!!! I'd look at the Tamron 70-180mm instead of the 70-300. I doubt you will need the extra reach, you can always crop in post, and the F2.8 aperture and quality of the 70-180 are better. Enjoy the SIII!!!
Not a pro but just a photography lover here...and I love my Sony a7iii, so thank you very much for this video, let's me know my money was well spent!!! Would you happen to know if there will be another firmware update in the near future to update some or any of the issues you spoke of? It's been awhile.
Awesome!!! So I really don't expect another big firmware update since there is likely an A7IV around the corner. I actually think they planned to release one this fall but delayed it
Your video was really beneficial. I'm interested in either purchasing the Sony A7iii w/ an FE 28-70 mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Lens OR a Nikon Z6ii w/ a NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S. I will be primarily shooting photography but also dabbling in cinematography. I'm concerned (based on my research) that the Sony isn't as durable as the Nikon and won't be able to hold up or handle the elements as well. I live in the Northeast, so some of the best photos will take me to cold (and potentially wet) locations. If I'm overthinking it and the Nikon's rougher/grippier looking "weather proof" exterior is just a facade, please tell me. Likewise, I keep hearing videographers praise the Sony over the Nikon, but then hear a decent number of photographers brag about the colors of Nikon over Sony. I'm trying to ease back into photography, but want to invest in an ecosystem that I see myself using ten years down the line (really want to avoid buying glass and then switching to a competitor later). This will be my first time shooting w/ more than my phone in almost 6 years. I first learned on an old 35mm film Canon, and later my Canon EOS 550D. Looking forward to making the jump into mirrorless FF camera. Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Awesome! So I'd agree that the Nikon Z6II is built more rugged (not that the A7III will have an issue...no clue) and in most areas, the Z6II does come out a little ahead of the A7III. Sony took video to a new level with the A7III hence why so many use and rave about it but since then Nikon has caught up with the A7III. In Sony's defense though, the A7IV is definitely an improvement to both the Z6II and A7III it's just that it also happens to be $500 more. I will also say that Sony's ecosystem is better than Nikon at the moment and probably will maintain that so keep that in mind. If you really want the best of the best for years to come, consider saving for the A7IV otherwise between the A7III and Z6II, the Nikon wins with video, colors, and ruggedness while the A7III wins with autofocus and ecosystem. Overall Image quality is pretty similar on both. Either camera will be a huge update from the 550D though!
@@dswatson83 Thanks for your reply! Thinking I may pull the trigger on the Nikon.
I'd absolutely love to get my hands on one to start my own business! Losing your business because of covid sucks but I definitely see that as a sign to start a new chapter in my life and photography has always been a passion of mine! :) Love the review, you've inspired me Dan!
Definitely an opportunity to start a new chapter! Covid was pretty rough to photography too though. Most of my time pre covid was spent shooting weddings which were ALL canceled as were my travel plans and thus a bunch of sponsored videos. The nice thing about doing your own thing is that you are free to adapt and find new areas to thrive in so stay inspired and coming up with new idea!
I just bought this camera finally, haha. Upgrading from a Canon 5DII... so a three year old camera seems practically new to me, haha.
I have 5dmk2 too and I want to upgrade to a7r3, a7 3 or R6. Are you happy with a7iii? Do you think a7r3 would be better choice? I will use ef lenses with Sigma mc-11.
@@mordavian I'm happy with the A7III, yeah. I take a LOT of photos since I shoot some events, and in my own time do street and portraits, so for me the amount of time I spend editing RAW files is a huge issue. So that's why I didn't want the extra resolution of the A7RIII--it would fill up too much hard drive space and slow down editing.
I considered going for Canon too... but the Sony has a lot of lens options that are cheaper right now, like good Sigma options. And when I was shooting DSLR I never felt like Canon was so kind to their customers. Plus, Sony still does have more leeway with their RAW files, which is important to me. I like being able to brighten the shadows significantly if I need to.
(My current lenses are the Sigma 24-70 2.8 and Sigma 85mm 1.4 new version. I plan to get the Sony 35mm 1.4 G-Master and Sigma 14-24 2.8 as my next two lenses.)
@@Tzadeck thank you for your answer. I don't have a plan to replace my lenses yet. I have ef 70-200 ii, 100L, 85L and Sigma 50 art. I had a6300 few years ago and I used it with the same lenses as a second cam. I was happy because it was small but I did not like ISO performance and I sold. I used it with Sigma mc-11. Focusing was not accurate and not so fast. If I return to Sony now I will face the same situation but I need some extra megapixels, ibis and ISO performance. R6 has wonderful specs but the biggest issue is its low mp value. My 5dm2 is already 21mp. I don't want to pay nearly $3000 and have 20 mp's although it has 4k60fps, 1dxm3 sensor and lots of other new features. I am really confused. I don't want to select eos r because of 30 mp either. A7r3 has 3 year old sensor but I will not be able to use it at maximum capacity with ef lenses.
Hey Dan, I've spent weeks debating what Sony is right for me I want to shoot quality video occasionally and also take photos more of a hybrid and it seems in the Sony line the A7III is still the best for both. Thoughts? Should i wait for the A7IV?
Looking to make a move from Nikon to Sony l looked on the Sony A7III. What is the next Sony on the line up after the Sony A7III. I am into portrait
Probably the Sony A7RIV. It has an upgraded AF system, slight body improvements, and a better viewfinder than the A7III
well i still like A73 but now i like fuji color scene.. how we can set like that on A73? please advise
+1
Have you tried Leeming LUT? It balances the Sony colors really well and makes them much easier to work with. Not the same as Fuji but way better than stock Sony
how has the Sony a7iii held up in rain? have you ever had to shoot with water or rain involved?
Game changing camera. Can’t wait for the a7iv, although we’d still be fine with the a7iii
Nice and timely review. How do we access the menu item descriptions that begin at 6:32? I have this camera and the a7r IV. I am a stills amateur shooter and use the a7III often. I keep the 55mm Zeiss f1.8 sonnar lens on it practically permanently.
I have all my guides posted here: Sony A7III Menu Guide: geni.us/A7guides
You can use a coupon code LC20 for 20% off as well!
can you use the old minolta dsrl lenses with this?
As someone who shoots more video, and isn't quite invested in any system... It's a little tough.
The A7C's awesome touch tracking features, smaller footprint for gimbal work is nice. But in the end it's still 8 bit colour.
The GH5 though, has everything else except autofocus and low-light performance.
R6 is totally out of the question. Anything that has a chance of overheating can't be used. Z6ii looks good, but not enough 3rd party lenses for budget options.
S1 was a little appealing to me, but the L-mount is the absolute worst out of all full frame mounts currently and I'm not sure if I should even invest into it yet.
hmmm........
Hahaha, I'm with you. There are definitely some cons with most of the $2000 systems out there right now. The A7SIII fixes all of that but it costs a bit more
I was thinking of getting the Nikon 6II but reviews state the AF BIF tracking is terrible.
How is the Sony A7III with BIF AF?
I'm just wanna wait for the A7IV
Hey I was thinking to buy a7iii but as of now it is 2 yr old camera and still best ......but I am having a trouble to make choice that should I wait for Sony a7iv because it may be coming soon....what are your thoughts on it. Help me on it😊
I am just to buy a a7 iii but have read some problems with the shutter. Schoud I be worried about that or go ahead and buy this camera???
Do you think the a73 is a good b cam to the a7s3 or should I get the a7c. I own the a73 thanks
I personally prefer the A7c to the A7III for video...better AF, unlimited recording, and the flip screen. Not a big upgrade but those come in handy
@@learningcameras thank you you helped make my decision, subbed
So torn on whether to pick one up or hope for some improvements in the a7iv, seems there is no way they don’t incorporate at least some of these enhancements into a newer model.
If you have a need for a good camera right now then don't hesitate otherwise wait.
It looks like they delayed the A7IV so I doubt we will see one now for at least 3-6 months so keep that in mind. I'd say if you are a photo shooter, jump on this deal right now. If you are a video shooter that's where most of the potential improvements in an A7IV will be seen
@@learningcameras thank you sir. Obviously like most we just want it all. It could give you a handy with three fingers and someone would still say wish it used 4
@@learningcameras Must be something serious going on inside Sony, because they know full well that the longer they delay the A7IV, the more out-of-date it'll be on arrival.
@@TheRealMisterProtocol I was told had a fire in factory as well as if covid not bad enough
Did the a73 get the update that the a9 did so when you change lenses the shutter comes up and the sensor retracts?
Nope...but I honestly don't remember the A9 getting that
Does it have wi fi to connect to phone and download photos?
8:04 - which camera & lens did you shoot it with?
what about for sports videography? would you prefer the A73 or newer model for beginners?
If you're a beginner man, this is perfect for it. I've had it for a while now, and it's very reliable. Amazing colors, stability, especially with a Gimbal, plus amazing AF! The AF is incredible on top of low light, for football shots. It's really good. Especially for beginners.
Definitely this or an a a7riii they can be found relatively cheap! The a7c is smaller, and doesn’t have as many custom buttons, but it’s autofocus is slightly better than the a7iii
You may also like the Sony a6600, which is an apsc sensor, but has even better autofocus. You can find an a7iii used in the same price range thoug
I was considering picking this camera up for a start up UA-cam channel, but also for taking underwater stills with an ikelite case. Would you recommend any other cameras to look at for those two vastly different goals?
So this camera would be the best if you wanted to accomplish both of those with one camera. But if one of those needs is more important than the other, let me know! The A7c would be better for UA-cam but it's new and I'm not sure if they have underwater cases
Hey, I want to upgrade my gear and looking to get a new camera. I mainly focus on wildlife photography for the new camera. My old camera is a Nikon D5300. I want to update to a full-frame.
The 3 main things are weight, price, and lenses availablety. Do you have any recommendations? I was thinking Sony A7III or nikonZ6?
damn that sponsorship transition was SMOOTH
Hi Dan, if you were to choose between a used A7 III, Canon R7 or R6. Which would you choose. It's just for hobby macro, wildlife family. I own a A7r II but it's AF is to slow and the battery life sucks. Hope you can help me out. Keep up the good work 👍
Hey. The A7III is still pretty solid for photos but when it comes to video, the R6 is much better and even the R7 too would be a better choice. So if you ONLY shoot photos, I'd say the A7III or R6 but if you also shoot video, the R6 would be my top choice. The problem with the R7 is Canon doesn't have any good APSC lenses so you really need full frame lenses so you might as well save up and get a full frame camera
Thanks for your advise Dan, appreciate it. I'm (not yet) into video. Eventhough it looks if I'm the only one these days 😂 The Canons appear to me because of their focus tracking. It'l come down to the R6 or 7. Greetz from the Netherlands
do you think there is a update coming for the a 7 III to use it with the new LA-EA5 adapter?
Great video dude. Love the content here. Top quality. Looking forward to more 👍
What are your thoughts on the Canon 90D? Is that a good alternative for purely video?
Hi im looking for an upgade from my nikon crop sensor to mirror less , my only use will be taking portraits and wedding pics, how good is a7iii when it comes to taking portraits, group pics wedding pics, please update
The A7III is great for that...amazing eye autofocus so great for portraits and weddings
@@learningcameras Thank you , i finally ordered my sony A7iii, just waiting for its arrival 😊
Hey awesome video... I'm currently looking and its really difficult. I've a budget of about 2k € and this needs to include a camera + a good lense for product photography and life style shots. I've been looking at the sony a7iii, z6, eos rp, eosr. What would you go with? Wish you the best, Seb
Just bought mine this summer and I've been loving it since!
and here is the question ..sony a7iii or fuji xt4 mostly for video ???? the only think that hold me back fro the xt4 is the AF issues >>> what do you thin ?? thank you
So the video features on the XT4 were awesome but I did have some AF issues which I outlined in my review and functionality wise, it just wasn't amazing for video. But, it does have the 4k60 advantage so tough call!
Dan great video. I think it is time to trade-up to mirrorless camera. My son's wedding is coming up and I feel it is right time to trade in my entry DSRL for mirrorless. I am currently a Nikon owner and comparing the Sony A7iii over the Z6 or Z6ii. The main reason is the price, I think it is the right time. I know that there will be learn curve, but I think the Sony A7iii is worth the experience. Am I right? or Should stay with Nikon? I am retire person and can't buy a new mirrorless camera every time some new comes out. The Honda Civic I have is 13 years old and have over 210,000 miles on. Your input will be appreciated.
Dan, I'm thinking about getting a Sony RX10 IV, but it has the low light, dynamic range, sharpness and DOF limitations compared to the A7 III. Is there any software out there that can simulate or select depth of field in post production (or in camera)? If a small sensor has a wide DOF, isn't it easier to defocus part of the frame later than to sharpen? Also, how do you rate the RX10 IV (if at all) in comparison to the A7 III in terms of color, color depth, dynamic range, detail and DOF. Thanks for any answers to these questions.
Hey! So I believe the new Luminar NEO (coming in February) will have shallow DOF simulations to make it seem more like a full frame camera. The RX10 definitely doesn't touch the A7III when the A7III is paired with an amazing wide aperture lens. Where the RX10 advantage comes in is compared to the A7III with a basic kit lens. And while the A7III will still be better, the RX will be close enough in quality to the A7III/Kit lens especially at lower ISO in decent light and at a much lower price than the A7III. But if you to add a $5000 in lenses to the A7III to buy a 24-70 and 70-200 F2.8, the A7III would be a noticeable improvement to all areas of image quality, build, and features.
Is it normal to get a bit of delay or lag when viewing photos on Sony A7iii ? I’m concerned something might be wrong and don’t want to sell me camera if there is an issue. Some photos change instantly when using the wheel to scroll through photos but then sometimes it will just delay 5-10 seconds before changing , as if the memory is struggling or something
You shouldn't have lag like that. It could lag for a split second but if you are seeing that much time, something is up
I am going to buy my first camera should I go for a7m3 or a7C for professional photography videography cinematography and vlogging
Check out this comparison to help you a bit better but a tough choice: ua-cam.com/video/x3iSr7sYdtI/v-deo.html
The A7C does come with some free extras now though: bhpho.to/30uYprD
I'm contemplating buying the a7iii as I'm creating online courses, will be doing video logs, travel logs, and enjoy photography. I can pick it up for less than 2k second hand and I might have an interesting deal. Though, the a7c tends to be a few hundred more at this point, I'm not sure its worth the 300-400 more. I'd rather put that in a lense instead ...
So worth it is tough to define but I'll give you a few examples. Typically creating an online course might require filming for more than 30 minutes. It's horrible to be done with your filming only to find out that the camera stopped recording half way though because you went over the 30 minute limit the A7III had. Also, having a flip screen allows you to identify some potential issues like non recording or potentially out of focus problems. The A7c does have eye AF during video which the A7III doesn't have which could come in handy. Stuff like that! Non of them are quality upgrades but it certainly could help with online courses and vlogs
I have a question does the camera oversample from 6k in crop mode as well, or is it only in Full frame?
I'm asking because I have some crop lenses and obviously it will compromise some pixels in photo mode, but was wondering if there is any quality loos in video mode when used with crop lenses since 4k only requires 8mpx.
So no, in the crop mode it only has a smaller area of the sensor it can use so it can't sample from 6k. However it does a full pixel readout in 4k so still great quality...but with less sensor area there is also a small reduction in low light performance and potentially dynamic range in the crop mode
@@learningcameras thanks for that.
do you think it is still worth it? now 7 months after the video#s been published
What is the lense in the thumbnail?
135mm F1.8 GM
I currently own a7ii and I have been waiting for a7iv. Earlier I thought that a7iv would come out in 2020 but now it seems like probably Q3 of 2021...I started doing paid jobs several months ago. Even though I got nice photos and my clients were satisfied with them, there were also some frustrating moments with my a7ii. I was really looking forward to a7iv but since a7iv won't come out any time soon, now I am trying to decide what to do. An important photoshoot is coming up soon and I even thought about getting an used a7iii while waiting for a7iv. Having two cameras would be also beneficial for occasions like wedding. Or should I just keep using a7ii hoping for a7iv to come out this Fall...
So the A7III isn't really a big update for photo quality...it's more about the hardware/features/video. So I'm all for getting a used A7III but if image quality is your concern, don't update just for that
@@learningcameras Thank you for your advice!
Is the sony a7iii worth it for bad weather? Like light rain and snow? Thank you for your great videos
Thanks! It does have weather sealing so it will be decent in those conditions. I believe the bottom of the camera is the most vulnerable. It's not the most weatherized rugged body in the world but it does have seals in most areas
What camera are you using to record this video please
Shot it with this camera: bhpho.to/30Wfhat
Dan: Thanks for this informative review. I'm considering buying a Sony A7III but I may want to buy a newer Sony model. What is a comparable Sony full-frame mirrorless that was released after this camera? I mainly take photos of cityscapes, architecture, landscapes, street and candids. Thank you!
Im looking to buy the A7iii mainly for music videos, but also to take fast, quality photos.. you mentioned the a7c and the z6ii. I was looking at the Z7, but would like a price range under 2000. any suggestions?
So the A7c has better video with improved AF, unlimited recording, and a flip screen so I tend to prefer it to the A7III for video. The Z6ii is way better than the Z7 for video and even has a few advantages to the Sony so one of those two would be the best!