My 2012 platinum looks the exact same. It was the best third row then. I sat in everything (Escalade/navigator ect). I'm 6'2 275 and it's fine in the back. Looking to upgrade in the next 24 months. Wish they would redesign. Love my Toyota.
DM, A couple of months back Automotive News reported that TMC is in the middle of a complete redesign of their full fleet of body-on-frame trucks/SUVs. It may take another year or two for them to reach market but at least you know your 2012 should still be running strong when the new ones arrive.
KentB27 yeah they are I recently bought a 07 navigator with 90k miles for 11k. I wanted a lx570 or Land cruiser but they were all 30k+ . My navigator is sitting outside with a leaking radiator. In the 3 months I've owned it I've swapped the whole air suspension to coils(the airbags were leaking, Dealership did it for me for free ). a/c went out with previous owner so they had it replaced and overfilled had to bleed some out(dealership did it again for free) the radiator cap went out 2 weeks ago(easy fix just left me stranded had tow), the other day the heater hose burst right as I was pulling up home. ($80 part) installed it today and started filling up the coolant to realize something happened to the radiator as well and it was leaking horrblly. ($160). This was all in 3 months. I had a Lexus I bought with 200k and it didn't have one issue with for the year I own it. there's a reason they don't loose there value. I really love my navigator but I'm really hoping this is the end of it. If this keeps going I'm gonna have to get rid of it.
Right Lane Hog They also barely sell any of them. Their sales compared to the competition are absolutely laughable. Ford sells over 5x as many expeditions and GM sells over 10x as many Tahoe’s alone. That’s not even counting the Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade. That figure probably more than doubles when you include those trucks. People aren’t interested in buying an outdated truck that lags behind the competition. If they made the pricing more competitive they’d sell more of them.
I have this truck. 3 years now. Got it for under $50k. It’s an awesome truck. And I don’t care about the fancy stuff that makes other cars more expensive expensive and less reliable. Sure the new sequoia it’s better looking and fancier. But this one does everything right and I don’t have to worry about anything. Oil changes and that’s it.
Calling it a geriatric is unwarranted. Body - on - frame is the only way to go. I can’t wait to get back into a 4Runner or maybe a sequoia. To me, the only detractor is fuel economy and the emissions. Makes me feel guilty. Starting with an actual key is a great feeling.
This is not the first time you have sed that Toyota did a mail in job..I’m disappointed in Toyota... maybe Toyota believes it’s truck sales are held up by its older engineering... but I believe that the only ones buying this is people that know the trademark for owing a Toyota.. it’s reliable... but u can do reliable and updated tech and power trains...13 or 14 combined mileage is rediculious!!.. there needs to be an 8 or 10 speed here... great review Steve.. I completely understand your review.. it’s a lot to ask nearly 60k for all that to be missing
That might have been the case a decade ago but today the bank set residuals are going towards GMC Yukon at around 60% where Sequoia is 57-58%, so says Edmund's. forums.edmunds.com/discussion/43459/gmc/yukon/2017-gmc-yukon-lease-deals-and-prices
Why would they not put a smart key with push button start on this? Mindboggling oversight in my option. I like it but there a things that are simply missing...
Toyota needed to get it right with hp horsepower and torques fuel efficiency in all their engines both gasoline and diesels the third row seats can dropped out as Lexus L's 570 as the land cruiser is offering on selected models for those who wanted space like the range rover Vogue or rangerover sports.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes please Im dying for a jeep review and im particularly interested in how well it handles the grocery runs.
James Connor This is what people do with Wranglers: ua-cam.com/video/3UEZmItqDv4/v-deo.html This is not how Americans drive new Land Cruisers - sorry. If you think that you’re delusional.
@@stevehammes Plenty of us off road our landcruisers. If you were part of the group you'd know that. Hell there's a local here running his at the Baja1000 every year since he's bought the truck. Plenty of us who drive Lexus's off road as well. Get real. You don't run in these circles so how would you ever know? Plenty of clips on FB and instagram of folks building their LX's and LC's.
danny kelly, I really don’t care what it’s like at 100,000 miles. I get rid of vehicles after five years anyways. I’ve owned twenty vehicles and my diesel is by far my favorite.
Now... Why cant they find a way to get the V8 to be able to disable 4 cylinders when on the highway or on speeds say... above 65MPH??? Its 2018, nothing should get 14MPG anymore.... My 4Runner TRD Off-Road gets 18MPG... terrible too..
I don't dislike the look of the Sequoia's exterior, but the low-rent materials and poor design on the interior mean I'd never consider one, even used. They should have spent their TRD money on a redesigned/improved interior and that would have probably done more to boost sales for that model. Considering the money they're asking for these things, it doesn't even compete with segment competitors. And you'd think Toyota would want a piece of the Suburban/Tahoe/Expedition pie.
Another ace that’s in Toyota’s sleeve is the standard safety options that are standard even in the base model. However, I’m with you the Sequoia is dated and it’s why the Highlander outsells it 4-fold.
Billy Sou the Toyota PCS systems do not work and therefore insurance companies are not offering a discount. There are a couple of videos showing them running into obstacles on UA-cam.
maybe throw the new 8 speed in like the land cruiser and the mpg is so bad because of the gearing 4:30 great for towing but this isn't a 1 ton dually lol
All these complaints from people who don't own it. And if you have to ask what it's for then you don't need it. It's made for that guy who's going to need a reliable large SUV, with large family and has to toe and work daily with it. that's capable for actually off road and all terrain in sub zero climate to blistering hot temperature.
Same beast as before, huge weight, terrible handling and fuel economy, they slap HID lights and a couple of stupid gizmos and a $60,000 price for a 2007 Tundra cove-up with whistles and a pretentious idiot with fall for it.
I think moving forward they should make these monster SUVs unibody, with an option to have some sort of turbo v6 or v8 with cylinder deactivation. Just because people choose to have a large family doesn't mean they should have to suffer with the biggest gas guzzling thing ever if they choose an suv that can actually handle their family and cargo
In the Washington DC area the LC, sequoia and 4runner sell like hot cakes. I agree Toyota needs to be more progressive but they offer all the tech and refinement you need in their vehicles, just not in an ostentatious way. Look at Lexus.
I’ve spent a lot of time in sequoias and land cruisers and the land Crusier is so much better. The inside of the sequoia is beyond cheep. You failed to mention that there is almost no soft touch materials. The entire interior is constructed of cheep leather and hard plastic. My friend has a 2013 tundra platinum and on cold mornings all that hard plastic creeks and cracks over every tiny imperfection in the road. It’s unbelievable. The land Cruiser rides so much better is much quiter, looks and feels so much newer. It will also be way more reliable that a sequoia witch is already a very reliable truck.
Toyota has been floating on the reliability wave way too long, test drove this 2019 version..drives like a boat, fail. Tried domestic big 3, they were out of my price range and ended up with 2018 Armada SL with safety pkg, tows 8500lbs like a champ🤗, exceptional acceleration and small turning radius for its size, love the Armada. Test drive one and see for yourself! 😉
Yeah I wouldn’t buy this new. I would try and get a good CPO Lexus LX570 that’s a few years old instead. More luxury for the price but with the same truck and off roading capabilities.
Pretty sure the expedition and navigator have better third row seats. Consumer Reports thinks so, and so does motortrend. The third row in the 03 Expedition I had tons of space and was really high off the ground. And that seems to reflect what other reviewers are saying about the 2018 Expedition.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes I don't think that's fair to say. It may be better then the Explorer but the expedition has kinda been the third row seat comfort champ since 2003. And the last gen expedition(2015-2017) has more legroom. Plus even just looking at the seats tells the same story. The seats in the expedition are thick and tilted upwards so your thighs are supported, while they seem to be relatively flat and thin in the Sequoia. The Sequoia may be miles ahead of the Tahoe and Suburban that seems to dominate everyone's mindset when they think about full sized SUVs with third row seats, but I just don't think it's fair to say it's better then the Expeditions.
rangerover06sc The Expedition has a good 3rd row because Ford has moved into the 21st century and put independent rear suspension on the Expedition. Most of the competition still has space wasting solid rear axles in the rear. The 3rd rows on the GM trucks are laughable compared to the Expedition’s and Navigator’s
$59,840 is in line with the rest of the segment until you consider that most likely you won’t be getting a $10-15k discount on this thing like you will if you buy a Suburban or an Expedition. Toyota is notoriously stingy with discounts on trucks.
Land Cruiser is for off-road capabilities and prestige. If Toyota wants to reinvigorate Sequoia, they need to upgrade the tired power train, improve fuel efficiency, and add more techs.
The Land Cruiser is a serious off roader not a Suburban alternative. This is a Suburban alternative. This is not a hard core off roader. Land Cruiser really is designed for non US markets.
Toyota at the moment is the laziest car company when it comes to re-designing their cars most of these cars are at least 5 to 8 years old with no updates whatsoever shame on your Toyota
Amazing how folks don't understand the point of tried and true that will not fail, and would rather have some trash that falls apart outside of its warranty. Don't like it, buy something else. Plenty of us who care about a vehicle that works with less garbage to go wrong.
I think it's a great way for money saving bargains. You lose little and gain a lot. He is obviously discouraging people from Toyota but not trying to look to obvious. The right tow package would push it up to 10000 lbs.
JKIZZLLE Not really though because if you buy a GM or Ford full-size SUV you can easily get $10-15k off of the sticker price. Toyota won’t give discounts like that. You would never recoup that $10-15k more your paid upfront for the Toyota.
Most ppl who can TRUELY afford a 60k truck are not worried about an extra 100 bucks a month in gas vs. a more normal SUV. Most people who buy 60k vechicles have household incomes over 250k. Look up the stats.
indeed that 3rd row seat is spacious, I'm 5'10 and i can sit very comfortable, in the sequoia its all about space
My 2012 platinum looks the exact same. It was the best third row then. I sat in everything (Escalade/navigator ect). I'm 6'2 275 and it's fine in the back.
Looking to upgrade in the next 24 months. Wish they would redesign. Love my Toyota.
DM, A couple of months back Automotive News reported that TMC is in the middle of a complete redesign of their full fleet of body-on-frame trucks/SUVs. It may take another year or two for them to reach market but at least you know your 2012 should still be running strong when the new ones arrive.
My 02 Sequoia Limited 4x4 is doing just fine at 300k miles.
Ahhh i miss my sequoia! Sticker shock, its dated, and gets horrid mpg. BUT toyota reliability, resale, and i also love the way it drives & feels!
Ride quality is soooo good on those ! It's just time to update the whole truck
Nice. Now to those listening just buy a used a one for 30k less, then add which ever suspension you want.👍
Man O War yup..5100 all 4 1” spacer on my limited + air bag helper (deflated n i never tow).
Man O War Good luck finding one that’s depreciated to $30k that hasn’t had the piss driven out of it. These things are so overvalued used.
KentB27 yeah they are I recently bought a 07 navigator with 90k miles for 11k. I wanted a lx570 or Land cruiser but they were all 30k+ . My navigator is sitting outside with a leaking radiator. In the 3 months I've owned it I've swapped the whole air suspension to coils(the airbags were leaking, Dealership did it for me for free ). a/c went out with previous owner so they had it replaced and overfilled had to bleed some out(dealership did it again for free) the radiator cap went out 2 weeks ago(easy fix just left me stranded had tow), the other day the heater hose burst right as I was pulling up home. ($80 part) installed it today and started filling up the coolant to realize something happened to the radiator as well and it was leaking horrblly. ($160). This was all in 3 months. I had a Lexus I bought with 200k and it didn't have one issue with for the year I own it. there's a reason they don't loose there value. I really love my navigator but I'm really hoping this is the end of it. If this keeps going I'm gonna have to get rid of it.
@@97I30T ive been looking for a 14' or newer not a million miles for under $30k and not had any luck
@@MLProductions.1 only 90k miles and you're dumping $$ Toyota= reliability
So old. Toyota should discount these by $15k.
Sad thing is they won't do that because Toyota is notoriously stingy with discounts.
Old,reliable
They don't discount much because they don't have to.
Right Lane Hog They also barely sell any of them. Their sales compared to the competition are absolutely laughable. Ford sells over 5x as many expeditions and GM sells over 10x as many Tahoe’s alone. That’s not even counting the Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade. That figure probably more than doubles when you include those trucks. People aren’t interested in buying an outdated truck that lags behind the competition. If they made the pricing more competitive they’d sell more of them.
You are correct the competition sells many more but I would choose quality over quantity any day.
I have this truck. 3 years now. Got it for under $50k. It’s an awesome truck. And I don’t care about the fancy stuff that makes other cars more expensive expensive and less reliable. Sure the new sequoia it’s better looking and fancier. But this one does everything right and I don’t have to worry about anything. Oil changes and that’s it.
Calling it a geriatric is unwarranted. Body - on - frame is the only way to go. I can’t wait to get back into a 4Runner or maybe a sequoia.
To me, the only detractor is fuel economy and the emissions. Makes me feel guilty. Starting with an actual key is a great feeling.
Dream car. Perfection
Tail lights should have been LED those regular bulbs are horrible for 60k
Miguel Ircontar Agreed 100%
This is not the first time you have sed that Toyota did a mail in job..I’m disappointed in Toyota... maybe Toyota believes it’s truck sales are held up by its older engineering... but I believe that the only ones buying this is people that know the trademark for owing a Toyota.. it’s reliable... but u can do reliable and updated tech and power trains...13 or 14 combined mileage is rediculious!!.. there needs to be an 8 or 10 speed here... great review Steve.. I completely understand your review.. it’s a lot to ask nearly 60k for all that to be missing
Thanks!
Durability, reliability and re-sale value more than make up for the negatives.
It does have the highest residual value.
That might have been the case a decade ago but today the bank set residuals are going towards GMC Yukon at around 60% where Sequoia is 57-58%, so says Edmund's.
forums.edmunds.com/discussion/43459/gmc/yukon/2017-gmc-yukon-lease-deals-and-prices
Why would they not put a smart key with push button start on this? Mindboggling oversight in my option. I like it but there a things that are simply missing...
Hey Toyota, it's time for a Sequoia redesign.
Heming Feng They’ve been promising a redesign for both the Tundra and Sequoia for years and they seem to keep postponing it for whatever reason.
I suspect the redesign will arrive when it is ready unlike the competitors who let unsuspecting consumers discover the flaws.
Tundra, Sequoia and 4Runner are all being redesigned for the 2020 model year. Fall 2019 release.
Daniel B we are not accept redesign. We demand all new Toyota Sequoia, Tundra and 4Runner. Motherfucker Toyota company such lazy job!
If a Sequoia revs in the forest does it make a sound?
Just don't cut it down!
Toyota needed to get it right with hp horsepower and torques fuel efficiency in all their engines both gasoline and diesels the third row seats can dropped out as Lexus L's 570 as the land cruiser is offering on selected models for those who wanted space like the range rover Vogue or rangerover sports.
60k for that? No way!
We get that you dislike landcruisers. Your LC video was a review based on street driving for the soccer mom, which misses the point.
You’re right: most people who buy a new Land Cruiser drive right off the lot to their nearest off-road course.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes please Im dying for a jeep review and im particularly interested in how well it handles the grocery runs.
James Connor This is what people do with Wranglers: ua-cam.com/video/3UEZmItqDv4/v-deo.html
This is not how Americans drive new Land Cruisers - sorry. If you think that you’re delusional.
@@stevehammes Plenty of us off road our landcruisers. If you were part of the group you'd know that. Hell there's a local here running his at the Baja1000 every year since he's bought the truck. Plenty of us who drive Lexus's off road as well. Get real. You don't run in these circles so how would you ever know? Plenty of clips on FB and instagram of folks building their LX's and LC's.
Just buy an older used one, the tech is literally the same.
Way past due for a complete redesign
Seriously, this model has been stagnant for soooo long. I have a 2012 and this is barely different.
What a bummer, the new ones dont have the space like this
I’ll keep my 28 mpg’s on my TDI Audi Q7 that I picked up for only $39,000 with very low miles!
Give it 5 years or 100,000 miles and you’ll wish you didn’t keep it. Meanwhile this sequoia will be barely broken in.
danny kelly, I really don’t care what it’s like at 100,000 miles. I get rid of vehicles after five years anyways. I’ve owned twenty vehicles and my diesel is by far my favorite.
Now... Why cant they find a way to get the V8 to be able to disable 4 cylinders when on the highway or on speeds say... above 65MPH??? Its 2018, nothing should get 14MPG anymore.... My 4Runner TRD Off-Road gets 18MPG... terrible too..
I don't dislike the look of the Sequoia's exterior, but the low-rent materials and poor design on the interior mean I'd never consider one, even used. They should have spent their TRD money on a redesigned/improved interior and that would have probably done more to boost sales for that model. Considering the money they're asking for these things, it doesn't even compete with segment competitors. And you'd think Toyota would want a piece of the Suburban/Tahoe/Expedition pie.
Meadmaker 452
How's the drone, Steve? Hopefully, it didn't scuff up the Sequoia .
Billy Sou It’ll be back from repair shop on Friday. No damage to Sequoia
Another ace that’s in Toyota’s sleeve is the standard safety options that are standard even in the base model. However, I’m with you the Sequoia is dated and it’s why the Highlander outsells it 4-fold.
Billy Sou the Toyota PCS systems do not work and therefore insurance companies are not offering a discount. There are a couple of videos showing them running into obstacles on UA-cam.
Still more reliable than the rest.
Rest in peace to the drone...2018 to 2018
Andres Arteaga - Steve says his drone will be fixed by Friday.
Is Toyota tiring to clear out their old part bins?
It’s a V8 Sienna with a lift kit.
Thats why its cool af
anasim facts
Even the rav4 got a new facelift but this suv still like the same. This needs an update.
I still like this dinosaur 👍👍👍
I like the front end of this! I feel like this should have been a truck instead of an SUV
Dylan Wells the tundra...
maybe throw the new 8 speed in like the land cruiser and the mpg is so bad because of the gearing 4:30 great for towing but this isn't a 1 ton dually lol
All these complaints from people who don't own it. And if you have to ask what it's for then you don't need it. It's made for that guy who's going to need a reliable large SUV, with large family and has to toe and work daily with it. that's capable for actually off road and all terrain in sub zero climate to blistering hot temperature.
Same beast as before, huge weight, terrible handling and fuel economy, they slap HID lights and a couple of stupid gizmos and a $60,000 price for a 2007 Tundra cove-up with whistles and a pretentious idiot with fall for it.
I like this car)
I really wanna see this Toyota monster And The NISSAN patrol Nismo Race
It’s a dinosaur. Needs a total redesign from ground up. Way too expensive.
I think moving forward they should make these monster SUVs unibody, with an option to have some sort of turbo v6 or v8 with cylinder deactivation. Just because people choose to have a large family doesn't mean they should have to suffer with the biggest gas guzzling thing ever if they choose an suv that can actually handle their family and cargo
Go buy your unibody crap elsewhere. Plenty of those kinds of vehicles around. There's a huge market for body on frame with good reason.
You called it. Toyota made a grand highlander turbo and sequoia turbo
Why not update it to 2018. I dont get car companies that let cars go for so long with out a new update
🦖 🦕
In the Washington DC area the LC, sequoia and 4runner sell like hot cakes. I agree Toyota needs to be more progressive but they offer all the tech and refinement you need in their vehicles, just not in an ostentatious way. Look at Lexus.
I'd like the competition to 'progress' to the point of equaling Toyota's QDR.
This thing took 10 years to refresh and only the front gets updated? And there's no LED tail lights? What a joke lol This thing needs a redesign BADLY
I’ve spent a lot of time in sequoias and land cruisers and the land Crusier is so much better. The inside of the sequoia is beyond cheep. You failed to mention that there is almost no soft touch materials. The entire interior is constructed of cheep leather and hard plastic. My friend has a 2013 tundra platinum and on cold mornings all that hard plastic creeks and cracks over every tiny imperfection in the road. It’s unbelievable. The land Cruiser rides so much better is much quiter, looks and feels so much newer. It will also be way more reliable that a sequoia witch is already a very reliable truck.
Did they fix the chronic sludge problem with these vehicles? Don't buy them until they do.
Toyota has been floating on the reliability wave way too long, test drove this 2019 version..drives like a boat, fail. Tried domestic big 3, they were out of my price range and ended up with 2018 Armada SL with safety pkg, tows 8500lbs like a champ🤗, exceptional acceleration and small turning radius for its size, love the Armada. Test drive one and see for yourself! 😉
How’d the Armada work out?
@CM Burns Absolutely 💯 happy with it! 😊👍
based off teh Tundra but doesnt get the same updated treatments....smh...
Yeah I wouldn’t buy this new. I would try and get a good CPO Lexus LX570 that’s a few years old instead. More luxury for the price but with the same truck and off roading capabilities.
Pretty sure the expedition and navigator have better third row seats. Consumer Reports thinks so, and so does motortrend. The third row in the 03 Expedition I had tons of space and was really high off the ground. And that seems to reflect what other reviewers are saying about the 2018 Expedition.
I'll have the new one next month. We'll see but this is better than the previous Fords.
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Steve Hammes I don't think that's fair to say. It may be better then the Explorer but the expedition has kinda been the third row seat comfort champ since 2003. And the last gen expedition(2015-2017) has more legroom. Plus even just looking at the seats tells the same story. The seats in the expedition are thick and tilted upwards so your thighs are supported, while they seem to be relatively flat and thin in the Sequoia. The Sequoia may be miles ahead of the Tahoe and Suburban that seems to dominate everyone's mindset when they think about full sized SUVs with third row seats, but I just don't think it's fair to say it's better then the Expeditions.
rangerover06sc The Expedition has a good 3rd row because Ford has moved into the 21st century and put independent rear suspension on the Expedition. Most of the competition still has space wasting solid rear axles in the rear. The 3rd rows on the GM trucks are laughable compared to the Expedition’s and Navigator’s
KentB27, This Sequoia has independent rear suspension .
I thought the expedition had roomiest 3rd row!?
$59,840 is in line with the rest of the segment until you consider that most likely you won’t be getting a $10-15k discount on this thing like you will if you buy a Suburban or an Expedition. Toyota is notoriously stingy with discounts on trucks.
Mi futura adquisición
wow you would think it is from 2005.
TJC450 It came out in 2006 so you are not very far
Tony Joker 2008 was the release of the second gen Sequoia. Look up a 2005 sequoia, they look much different.
Land Cruiser is for off-road capabilities and prestige. If Toyota wants to reinvigorate Sequoia, they need to upgrade the tired power train, improve fuel efficiency, and add more techs.
Looks nice but that fuel economy.. yikes!
I’ve always hated the cruise control stalk for all the Toyota, it looks like a giant mole growing on the side.
Couldn't agree more! So outdated.
I like this car but its so expensive for me
I’d walk right away from this hot mess with no push button start nor cooled seats for that price may as well spend $20k more and get the land cruiser.
The Land Cruiser is a serious off roader not a Suburban alternative. This is a Suburban alternative. This is not a hard core off roader. Land Cruiser really is designed for non US markets.
Why race a tank? Just build an off road version Toyota
I could buy a slightly used 200 series Land Cruiser for $60k and go home with a big smile and no regrets.
need update it’s sooooo old
Toyota at the moment is the laziest car company when it comes to re-designing their cars most of these cars are at least 5 to 8 years old with no updates whatsoever shame on your Toyota
Raff Time Toyota, and Honda, have been testing on their laurels for sure.
This is untrue. Have you not seen the Camry, Corolla and RAV4? Nissan is lazier. Look at the Nissan Frontier.
Amazing how folks don't understand the point of tried and true that will not fail, and would rather have some trash that falls apart outside of its warranty. Don't like it, buy something else. Plenty of us who care about a vehicle that works with less garbage to go wrong.
I think the gmc savanna is worse
I think it's a great way for money saving bargains. You lose little and gain a lot. He is obviously discouraging people from Toyota but not trying to look to obvious. The right tow package would push it up to 10000 lbs.
This is Toyota's answer to a more well equipped Yukon and Expedition? Try again Toyota, you're so LAZY!
Terrible fuel economy.
Mag neto My father was going to buy either one of these or a Tundra and decided against it because of the abysmal gas mileage.
you will save in the long run due to almost 0 maintenance
JKIZZLLE Not really though because if you buy a GM or Ford full-size SUV you can easily get $10-15k off of the sticker price. Toyota won’t give discounts like that. You would never recoup that $10-15k more your paid upfront for the Toyota.
honestly thats pretty fair. It would have been nice to buy one of those fj cruisers though. They have lost nearly none of their original value.
Most ppl who can TRUELY afford a 60k truck are not worried about an extra 100 bucks a month in gas vs. a more normal SUV. Most people who buy 60k vechicles have household incomes over 250k. Look up the stats.
i wish for remove third row seat next year 2019!!!!
Why remove it? It folds down flat.
Right Lane Hog yeah I needed go to Toyota design center for 2019 Toyota Sequoia second row seat I am pretty satisfied and loved the tree
And I saw it for Lexus of Austin tx Lexus LX570 second row seat that’s was very biggest space many things
The new ford expedition is much much better and is still more reliable then this old shitt box
Time to ditch this old school truck
14 mpg. Lol! That worst than petrol v8
I've heard ppl are actually getting closer to 11mpg
That interior looks so cheap. Thought i was watching a Nissan truck.
Just buy a used one they all look the same
extremely outdated
Boring
Sucks... should be more sophisticated for that price.. 👎👎👎👎
Test drive complete. Meh. You can better spend your money elsewhere.