💰Do you watch UA-cam? if you do, here's how to turn your passion into an extra income from UA-cam, without ever showing your face or creating the videos yourself: l.viralprofits.yt/passion Shokz OPENFIT Earbuds - shokz.co/JakeTran
"Science is a systematic and methodological approach to understanding the natural world and the phenomena that occur within it." Where in this definition do you people see that science is an absolute fact? At the end of the day, it is a method developed by humans, so of course there are going to be mistakes and manipulations.
@@Dave_of_Mordor Science should always be questioned. Science requires questioning. Read the methods section to see if you can spot choices that likely favored the conclusion that the writer wanted. I married a scientist, who is always skeptical. She told me about some of the tricks that her colleagues would do in order to get a publication in a prestigious journal. A lot of science can't be replicated because it has been fudged to produce a certain outcome. Publish or perish!
Thankfully there are a FEW people who spend their lives proving that certain studies can NOT be replicated. Never trust any “science” until it’s been replicated quite a lot. And ALL FEDERALLY FUNDED STUDIES SHOULD BE PRE REGISTERED SO PEOPLE CAN AVOID PUBLISHIBG IMPORTANT NULL RESULTS!
The fact that you think we scientists get funding for completing studies like you would when making a commission goes to show that you have incorrect knowledge abt our trade.
That's just a symptom of a general lack, if not outright eschewing, of personal responsibility and accountability. It's not exactly surprising that she went that route, is it?
1.5 million for a professor's teaching position. While public school salaries are as low as 28k per year. And people wonder why college is so expensive, look at what they are paying these liars for. Shameful
College is super expensive and they can't afford to pay that high price is government garenteed loans. Just like hud and garenteed government loans for house made buying a house out of reach
That’s at Harvard. At state colleges salaries start at 55k. Private colleges is 79k nationwide. It also depends the department but the differences are not large.
Science is a process, a tool. If you apply it to groups of people, the answers cannot tell you what exactly each person will do… but it's still science.
I often help researchers with their studies, and you wouldn't believe how inept / corrupt the system is. Statistical significance isn't the whole picture anyway. Most people don't even know about Simpsons Paradox.
This pisses me off as a math grad student. People always assume I do statistics (or calculations). I always tell them stats is a pseudoscience and it is unbelievably easy to fudge results which is unlike math. Granted this is from the outside looking in, but hearing about these acedemia scandals confirms this. Plus these are only for people who are renowned. Imagine how many researchers at small schools who aren't known have fudged results to get a journal to accept a paper.
I made a PhD with only one single credit in the program in Ethics. That tells you how important Ethics actually is for a scientist. Don't be fooled by someone having some scientific degree. Most of the scientific work being done consists of pleasing and favoring the companies who pay for the research. In a nutshell, scientists please their patrons and not "SCIENCE" as truthful knowledge. Truth is usually not reported in science, only that what helps the patron make more money and what pleases the patron.
oh don't worry, there is now a bunch of "diversity" classes to make up for it. As for "ethics" all you need is an accusation of a microaggression all while plagiarism is simply ignored. Ethics have been abused to the point where systems to maintain ethical standards now work against ethical practices.
"Most of the scientific work consists of pleasing and favoring the companies who pay for the research" Yeah, like those studies that claim global warming is false? The ones that are funded by the likes of Cato, Heartland, and the fossil fuel companies? Such a braindead opinion is only made by people who know NOTHING about research. "I made a PhD" my arse!
You might get a scientist who honors what science is supposed to be but the company will just find another to approve what the other person refused. It’s a mess.
Science is a double-edged sword, and science can be used for evil or good, so you do not sanctify science as long as politics and the elites manipulate everything.
In my industry there is a saying that we were all told early in my career, “Successful people are willing to do things that unsuccessful people aren’t willing to do.” This was intended to mean “work harder”. Apparently it means something else to the elite class.
The economy too is grappling with uncertainties, global fluctuations, and pandemic aftermath, causing instability. Rising inflation, sluggish growth, and trade disruptions need urgent attention from all sectors to restore stability and stimulate growth.
Things are strange right now. The US dollar is becoming less valuable because of inflation, and other powerful nations waking up to trade in their own currencies. Good thing is, a lot of people still turn to the Dollar because of the safety is somehow assures. I'm worried about my retirement savings of about $420,000 losing value because of these factors and more. Where else can we keep our money?
Well, I suggest you make a diversification plan because it's been harder to build a good portfolio that stays afloat since covid-19. Personally, I garner knowledge from a brokerage advisor whom I work with, and I've actually made over $300K with their help since February. Very effective defensive strategies are used to protect my portfolio and make profits despite the ups and downs.
@@RosellaLCraigI find this intriguing. Could you please provide me with the means to get in touch with your Adviser? I am concerned about my dwindling portfolio.
@@marysakawa4628*My Fiduciary Adviser is MRS AVA KIMBERLY. She has since provide entry and exit points on the securities I focus on. You can look her up online if you care for supervision*.
WOW! Another eye-opening documentary worth watching. I never knew corruption can even erode supposedly unbiased and clean fields like science. It just comes to show that NOTHING AND NOBODY deserves a free pass without investigation. Thank you, Jake, for this awesome video.
The system really is the problem encouraging this behavior. I want to inspire more people to new systems that learn from the corruption and build in barriers to discourage toxic actions and encourage healthier ones. People that want slavery want to normalize toxic actions and people that want to normalize health want to normalize strength from health.
Yep just remove any data that disagrees, that's the least fraudulent method of falsifying data, because you're not adding fake information. But you are misleading people.
It's not even about vanity to fake results, you academia career can ONLY progress if you have your studies published in bigger and more important journals. These journals won't publish work that doesn't show anything worthwhile though, causing this issue.
Listen this should be a documentary I’ve been saying this for over 10 years most of these guys think we are dumb because they have phd but half the shit they tell us is speculative. Remember believe half of what you see and none of what you hear
The cases presented in the video show why peer review and reproducibility are so important - unless studies can be corroborated by independent parties reproducing similar results, single studies without any additional backing should always be viewed critically.
It is also important that many grantings based on research findings. So researchers are "encouraged" to have successful studies, which is a pressure on them to have a result one way or another that includes cheating.
Maybe there should be an auditing division in the science community that evaluates past experiments for authenticity. Then again I’m sure that will get corrupted too
im in university right now and the standards for students seems to have fallen as well. Im studying biomedical science as a pre-med and the number of classes that are geared toward medical practices such as my microbiology, organic chemistry, and bio statistics have had the exam score being very low. for most of the exams the average was around 50 for all 3 and becuz of this the university has curved the grade of the students so that they're barley passing. it seems that higher education is getting lax in their standards and the students dont seem to care that much about knowing the material and are entitled to a passing grade
absolutely, just the fact that teacher can determine the difficulty of the class and nobody cares about upholding high standards. the students barely have to try 😂 and the teachers barely have to even show up.
I've been noticing that professors are increasingly putting emphasis on projects and papers and not so much the tests. At least in the engineering discipline.
@@CareForEmAll this videos proves that if you can keep digging into the research, you can prove it is faulty. The problem is that most people rely on other people do the hard work. There are 10000s studies to review and more to conduct and only an certain amount of people.
Gino’s real blunder was atrociously lazy massaging of the numbers and a complete failure to cover her tracks. Yeah, typical office documents have a lot of metadata in them. Outliers also have extreme results on some statistical analyses, regression being one of the most significantly impacted.
Most veteran journalists are corrupt. What Theo Baker has can't be taught in schools and must be cherished and protected. His kind must be nurtured to serve our unscrupulous society.
There is a hidden case study about ego and insecurity in here somewhere. An analysis of this woman would probably help build some good hypothesis about this.
The answer to your last question is that thousands upon thousands of studies have been manipulated to achieve the desired outcome due to cherry picking data.... Happens everyday... It's all part of the social engineering program...
Shouldn’t the “clean” study have had a preliminary desirability survey and then a post survey? You can’t assign a specific result of increase without it. Did I miss whether the study did that?
I’m doing Econ research currently. I asked my advisor about citing psyc research for my paper and she strongly advised against it. A lot of psych studies are highly unreliable, easily manipulated, and are often disproven within a few years of being published. If I were to use that as a source, then it could negatively affect the integrity of my entire paper. Nooooo thank you
This makes me really angry as someone who’s going into debt doing psychological research like we already have such a bad rep for being “fake science” she is literally just making it worse
Once we, as a culture, decided to devalue and even deny, the concept of objectivity and truth, we were destined to lose science as well. Because if there is no truth, then of course everyone can “make” their own, according to what is good (or what they believe is best) for themselves. There’s a reason why the scientific era arose out of certain philosophical backgrounds and not from others.
Honestly this is why I don't believe anything or at least take it with a HUGE grain of salt. Internet trolls be like "wHeReS tHe PeEr ReViEwEd StUdY" as though two or ten people wouldn't lie their asses off and agree if it served them in some way.
What, are you referring to the observed temporary drop in global temperature during that time, as if it were to prove cyclicity? Because from my understanding, the drop was due to aerosols, sulphuric compounds and particulates partially blocking solar radiation in the atmosphere before it dissipated.
@@GTAVictor9128 nope. What part of “hotter,” do you not understand? Check actual records from 1920’s & ‘30’s, or check out Tony Heller, he’s done that research for you.
It's ironic because one would expect that a scientist , who is supposed to help people understand and improve their behavior and decision-making, would be less likely to engage in fraudulent or unethical behavior. The contrast between their knowledge and their actions highlights the complexity of human behavior and the fact that even experts in the field can make choices that contradict their training and expertise. This irony underscores the idea that human behavior can be influenced by a variety of factors, including personal motivations and circumstances…
There's a saying, "Those who can, do; those who cannot, teach." Thucydides wrote, "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." Interestingly, it seems that both of those sayings are no longer just sayings; they are unimpeachable fact.
Russia never even tried to debunk it, and it was in their best interest to debunk NASA to keep going the space race to the moon. But I agree there are weird things in there...
@@hermitcard4494 Well actually I did hear about some Russian journalist who tried to investigate as to how the U.S were able to get men to pass the Radiation belt surrounding the earth, to this day no other country has been able to do oddly enough, with the level of technology they had back then. When he was confronted by the Soviet government to not dig into Nasa, possibly in fear of geopolitical turmoil and complications into the space defense program.
@@hermitcard4494 it's all the same holding company, just different branches. The powers that be know to not push the space questions. Keep us filled with bread and war
She had to have known that none of her results could be replicated. What was the endgame? She knew it’d be discovered. Peer review is something you learn about at uni
Unlike any other field, science is the only stream where you cannot get away with misinformation. you will eventually get caught with their lies and mistakes. this video doesn't make me doubt the science, it just reassures me that science can have objective truth. And people like these investigators can rectify it.
You'll eventually get caught... if someone actually checks you, and decides to catch you. Many studies are never properly examined, replication is never attempted, and journals have the same incentive to cheat as researchers do. Most cheaters are forgotten about, nobody cares enough to check every research paper.
Not very familiar with phd research paper. But I wonder why people alter answers to support their hypothesis. If your hypothesis is : I will be rich if I go to casino every night. And the result proven : my hypothesis is incorrect. Isn’t it also okay to have the result that is to deny my hypotheses ?
You know what would be a good video doing a story about the Southerners who profited off the misery of others during the early part of the 20th century
Can U Expose David Sinclair On His Mouse Study. He Claims Aging Is Related To Loss Of Epigenetic Changes Overtime But He Doesn't Talk About Other Factors. He Also Had Made A Fortune Exaggerating His Anti Aging Products.
The creativity of dishonesty is only limited by imagination and opportunity, as there is no care for good behaviour and such hinderances - for anything but appearances..
It shocks me how little effort she put into faking the results. The cleaning products one was the worst. It would be SO easy to spread the fake numbers among a bunch of students instead of using extreme numbers on just a few students to skew the results. Additionally, inputting “Harvard” without checking to make sure that was was the paper was asking for is beyond comprehension. Especially when it’s in a spreadsheet. Did she not even glance over the results after she put the fake ones in? And then she sent these people the clearly fake results for the coin flip one? Oh my god. I don’t understand how a functional human, let alone a HARVARD PROFESSOR, being could be so dumb.
I dont get it. Its really really easy to fudge data on an Excel sheet in a way that no one will ever find it. Why did she do it in such an obvious manner?
3.03. Behavioral science is grounded on Freudian psychosexual confabulation, Erikson childhood development theory, Bandura Social learning theory and now clinical psychology by the American Psychological Association. Yet had Freud read Darwin, we would l have been spared 120 years of misdirection 😢.
💰Do you watch UA-cam? if you do, here's how to turn your passion into an extra income from UA-cam, without ever showing your face or creating the videos yourself: l.viralprofits.yt/passion
Shokz OPENFIT Earbuds - shokz.co/JakeTran
discount code?
John money
Do a story on fake dinosaurs. See how this billion dollar industry collapses. 80% of fossils were faked.
I'm not paying $180 for AirPods.
@@LeoUnna. 😅.
she cheated her study about honesty? thats nice
They are anti white and anti American they don’t care about honesty
☕🤣
Thats so wild
Lol
Proof we should trust nobody but ourselves
“ Science is real and should be trusted, but don’t forget that science can be manipulated ”
"Science is a systematic and methodological approach to understanding the natural world and the phenomena that occur within it."
Where in this definition do you people see that science is an absolute fact? At the end of the day, it is a method developed by humans, so of course there are going to be mistakes and manipulations.
@@Dave_of_Mordor Science should always be questioned. Science requires questioning. Read the methods section to see if you can spot choices that likely favored the conclusion that the writer wanted.
I married a scientist, who is always skeptical. She told me about some of the tricks that her colleagues would do in order to get a publication in a prestigious journal. A lot of science can't be replicated because it has been fudged to produce a certain outcome. Publish or perish!
Yes science can be manipulated just ask Big Pharma
@@Dave_of_Mordorhave you met the modern left? Science has now become their dogma/worldview
@@Dave_of_Mordorgo get your booster shot libtard
People refuse to understand "peer reviewed" tends to mean "if we agree this is true we get funding" not to mention the replicatability crisis.
Thankfully there are a FEW people who spend their lives proving that certain studies can NOT be replicated.
Never trust any “science” until it’s been replicated quite a lot. And ALL FEDERALLY FUNDED STUDIES SHOULD BE PRE REGISTERED SO PEOPLE CAN AVOID PUBLISHIBG IMPORTANT NULL RESULTS!
💯
EXACTLY. And those of us who recognize this are dismissed out of hand.
agree, replicatability crisis is not talked about enough. It's all you need to know, really.
The fact that you think we scientists get funding for completing studies like you would when making a commission goes to show that you have incorrect knowledge abt our trade.
Maybe she should've signed a pledge of honesty
Lmao
at the top of the page at that....
To the top of the page you go!
One at the top and another at the bottom.
It’s called testifying under oath
Amazing how brazen she was fabricating research on honesty. And she has the nerve to sue the people who exposed her. Utterly disgraceful.
That's just a symptom of a general lack, if not outright eschewing, of personal responsibility and accountability. It's not exactly surprising that she went that route, is it?
I mean…HONESTLY!?!!!! 😉
1.5 million for a professor's teaching position. While public school salaries are as low as 28k per year. And people wonder why college is so expensive, look at what they are paying these liars for. Shameful
Abd most professors teaching like shit
Plus all the good for nothing administrative class sucking the resources of the universities
College is super expensive and they can't afford to pay that high price is government garenteed loans. Just like hud and garenteed government loans for house made buying a house out of reach
It’s ridiculous, and those idiots just hammer in political ideology over everything else. Part of why the worlds going to shit
That’s at Harvard. At state colleges salaries start at 55k. Private colleges is 79k nationwide. It also depends the department but the differences are not large.
Social sciences are "soft sciences" for a reason. We used to be more skeptical of people calling surveys "science."
Science is a process, a tool. If you apply it to groups of people, the answers cannot tell you what exactly each person will do… but it's still science.
Couldn't agree more.
Yeah and somehow y'all have turned the "hard" sciences into soft science too
all of STEM has been just as corrupted as well
@@alexmipego it is triangulation
I often help researchers with their studies, and you wouldn't believe how inept / corrupt the system is. Statistical significance isn't the whole picture anyway. Most people don't even know about Simpsons Paradox.
🤔Umm-What’s that?..
This pisses me off as a math grad student. People always assume I do statistics (or calculations). I always tell them stats is a pseudoscience and it is unbelievably easy to fudge results which is unlike math.
Granted this is from the outside looking in, but hearing about these acedemia scandals confirms this. Plus these are only for people who are renowned. Imagine how many researchers at small schools who aren't known have fudged results to get a journal to accept a paper.
Tell me you know about Phacking without telling me 😂
@@Sedgewise47 look it up ON THE INTERNET. Sheesh.
@@jekku4688
🤔 So UA-cam video comments section don’t count as “Internet”?
I made a PhD with only one single credit in the program in Ethics. That tells you how important Ethics actually is for a scientist. Don't be fooled by someone having some scientific degree. Most of the scientific work being done consists of pleasing and favoring the companies who pay for the research. In a nutshell, scientists please their patrons and not "SCIENCE" as truthful knowledge. Truth is usually not reported in science, only that what helps the patron make more money and what pleases the patron.
I really wish we all could regain our 0ower from authority
oh don't worry, there is now a bunch of "diversity" classes to make up for it.
As for "ethics" all you need is an accusation of a microaggression all while plagiarism is simply ignored.
Ethics have been abused to the point where systems to maintain ethical standards now work against ethical practices.
"Most of the scientific work consists of pleasing and favoring the companies who pay for the research"
Yeah, like those studies that claim global warming is false? The ones that are funded by the likes of Cato, Heartland, and the fossil fuel companies?
Such a braindead opinion is only made by people who know NOTHING about research. "I made a PhD" my arse!
You might get a scientist who honors what science is supposed to be but the company will just find another to approve what the other person refused. It’s a mess.
Science is a double-edged sword, and science can be used for evil or good, so you do not sanctify science as long as politics and the elites manipulate everything.
In my industry there is a saying that we were all told early in my career, “Successful people are willing to do things that unsuccessful people aren’t willing to do.” This was intended to mean “work harder”. Apparently it means something else to the elite class.
Ain’t that the truth. It’s always what they “say” vs. What is actually meant and understood
Never met a person who never cheated before; successful people are cheaters.
Working hard alone has never gotten anyone success (at least not while they're still alive).
@@Icarus4002 I’ve literally never cheated. Not everyone is a cheater. But perhaps you are?
Like work hard?
The economy too is grappling with uncertainties, global fluctuations, and pandemic aftermath, causing instability. Rising inflation, sluggish growth, and trade disruptions need urgent attention from all sectors to restore stability and stimulate growth.
Things are strange right now. The US dollar is becoming less valuable because of inflation, and other powerful nations waking up to trade in their own currencies. Good thing is, a lot of people still turn to the Dollar because of the safety is somehow assures. I'm worried about my retirement savings of about $420,000 losing value because of these factors and more. Where else can we keep our money?
Well, I suggest you make a diversification plan because it's been harder to build a good portfolio that stays afloat since covid-19. Personally, I garner knowledge from a brokerage advisor whom I work with, and I've actually made over $300K with their help since February. Very effective defensive strategies are used to protect my portfolio and make profits despite the ups and downs.
@@RosellaLCraigI find this intriguing. Could you please provide me with the means to get in touch with your Adviser? I am concerned about my dwindling portfolio.
@@marysakawa4628*My Fiduciary Adviser is MRS AVA KIMBERLY. She has since provide entry and exit points on the securities I focus on. You can look her up online if you care for supervision*.
Now do one on how pharmaceutical companies do their research to prove the effectiveness of their medicines
You will have a long wait ,
Yes, especially SSRI's which are clearly sugar pills marketed en-masse.
They just tell us "safe and effective" and the sheeple believe it.
@@eyehatemyjob they can do multiple tests on safety and effectiveness and keep only the results that suit them
WOW! Another eye-opening documentary worth watching. I never knew corruption can even erode supposedly unbiased and clean fields like science. It just comes to show that NOTHING AND NOBODY deserves a free pass without investigation. Thank you, Jake, for this awesome video.
The system really is the problem encouraging this behavior. I want to inspire more people to new systems that learn from the corruption and build in barriers to discourage toxic actions and encourage healthier ones. People that want slavery want to normalize toxic actions and people that want to normalize health want to normalize strength from health.
When i went through M.E. school, i realized very quickly how easy it is to skew data results. I can make any data set confirm any hypothesis i want.
Yep just remove any data that disagrees, that's the least fraudulent method of falsifying data, because you're not adding fake information. But you are misleading people.
Anyone who has ever done a lab in high school or uni knows everyone fudges the numbers. I guess this carries on into adulthood.
Indeed - all too often students will fudge the numbers to conceal the fact they did the lab experiment wrong, so they don't have to start over.
Science can be questioned
Propaganda can't
Propaganda can't be questioned? Ok..
It's not even about vanity to fake results, you academia career can ONLY progress if you have your studies published in bigger and more important journals. These journals won't publish work that doesn't show anything worthwhile though, causing this issue.
That's scratching the surface of all what's wrong in academia
There's nothing more anti-science right now than the actual academic science industry.
Listen this should be a documentary I’ve been saying this for over 10 years most of these guys think we are dumb because they have phd but half the shit they tell us is speculative. Remember believe half of what you see and none of what you hear
'if you want to do bad things science is the most powerful way to do them'Richard Dawkins,,,Jake you are the best
Anyone can make ground breaking discoveries.
You don't need a piece of paper from a university to think.
The cases presented in the video show why peer review and reproducibility are so important - unless studies can be corroborated by independent parties reproducing similar results, single studies without any additional backing should always be viewed critically.
The whole system is full of 💩 and that only took 10 seconds🤯😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
It is also important that many grantings based on research findings. So researchers are "encouraged" to have successful studies, which is a pressure on them to have a result one way or another that includes cheating.
This happens all day, every day, in every discipline
Maybe there should be an auditing division in the science community that evaluates past experiments for authenticity. Then again I’m sure that will get corrupted too
That would be peer-reviewing I think
But not a lot of people do peer reviews because “who wants to be second?”
A company i love sponsored a creator i love and that just warms my cold little heart
im in university right now and the standards for students seems to have fallen as well. Im studying biomedical science as a pre-med and the number of classes that are geared toward medical practices such as my microbiology, organic chemistry, and bio statistics have had the exam score being very low. for most of the exams the average was around 50 for all 3 and becuz of this the university has curved the grade of the students so that they're barley passing. it seems that higher education is getting lax in their standards and the students dont seem to care that much about knowing the material and are entitled to a passing grade
absolutely, just the fact that teacher can determine the difficulty of the class and nobody cares about upholding high standards. the students barely have to try 😂 and the teachers barely have to even show up.
lol wut
I've been noticing that professors are increasingly putting emphasis on projects and papers and not so much the tests. At least in the engineering discipline.
So basically students purchase a degree instead of earn a degree.
It’s called grade inflation. It is actually the worst in the Ivy League.
Remember this when people tell you "trust the science!"
Inevitably, they seem to be talking about science like this...
"Trust the science" --- Anthony Fauci
You should trust the science, on huge data points that multiple people vetted.
@@T_Time_you say that like our scientist havnt been bought out for a hundred or so years 😂 we are being spoon fed lies
@@CareForEmAllif our scientists was brought out, people wouldn’t know the danger of cigarettes.
@@CareForEmAllwe are spoon fed lies, by channel like fox providing in court that they had to settle.
@@CareForEmAll this videos proves that if you can keep digging into the research, you can prove it is faulty. The problem is that most people rely on other people do the hard work. There are 10000s studies to review and more to conduct and only an certain amount of people.
Jake, I am about to fact check all of your mini documentaries!
watch the whole video before commenting eh?
idiot
Please do
The truth could slap you in the face and you still wouldn't believe it. I have actually research some of Jake's stuff and this man isn't lying.
@@aishar8482why have such a position? Everyone should fact checked. Are you taking everything Jake says as gospel?
Gino’s real blunder was atrociously lazy massaging of the numbers and a complete failure to cover her tracks. Yeah, typical office documents have a lot of metadata in them. Outliers also have extreme results on some statistical analyses, regression being one of the most significantly impacted.
Most veteran journalists are corrupt. What Theo Baker has can't be taught in schools and must be cherished and protected. His kind must be nurtured to serve our unscrupulous society.
gl with that, corruption is the name of the game
There is a hidden case study about ego and insecurity in here somewhere. An analysis of this woman would probably help build some good hypothesis about this.
Def!
10:50 you highlighted the wrong column in Red, the second time should be the right column. Consider changing this.
There's a professor at Howard who has been doing this for years too! His name is Chris Boxe. His forte is stealing other people's work too
@9:43 in her Cheaters=More Creative was almost like she was stroking her own ego
The answer to your last question is that thousands upon thousands of studies have been manipulated to achieve the desired outcome due to cherry picking data.... Happens everyday...
It's all part of the social engineering program...
Shouldn’t the “clean” study have had a preliminary desirability survey and then a post survey? You can’t assign a specific result of increase without it. Did I miss whether the study did that?
I’m doing Econ research currently. I asked my advisor about citing psyc research for my paper and she strongly advised against it. A lot of psych studies are highly unreliable, easily manipulated, and are often disproven within a few years of being published. If I were to use that as a source, then it could negatively affect the integrity of my entire paper. Nooooo thank you
Jake continues to deliver incredible content!
This makes me really angry as someone who’s going into debt doing psychological research like we already have such a bad rep for being “fake science” she is literally just making it worse
She has a bright future in the pharmaceutical industry, CDC, or NIH.
A freakin mennnnn
Once we, as a culture, decided to devalue and even deny, the concept of objectivity and truth, we were destined to lose science as well. Because if there is no truth, then of course everyone can “make” their own, according to what is good (or what they believe is best) for themselves. There’s a reason why the scientific era arose out of certain philosophical backgrounds and not from others.
This is why in science, do you have to re-run experiments over and over as well as have independent people re-run experiments.
She didn't cheat ... She Misinterpreted The Rules!
Now imagine what they did with covid.
Oh yeah. They fudged the numbers on that one.
No refunds
Honestly this is why I don't believe anything or at least take it with a HUGE grain of salt. Internet trolls be like "wHeReS tHe PeEr ReViEwEd StUdY" as though two or ten people wouldn't lie their asses off and agree if it served them in some way.
Well of course, look at “climatologists” hockey stick graph, where temps from 1920’s-‘30’s are grossly fudged or omitted
What, are you referring to the observed temporary drop in global temperature during that time, as if it were to prove cyclicity? Because from my understanding, the drop was due to aerosols, sulphuric compounds and particulates partially blocking solar radiation in the atmosphere before it dissipated.
@@GTAVictor9128 nope. What part of “hotter,” do you not understand? Check actual records from 1920’s & ‘30’s, or check out Tony Heller, he’s done that research for you.
It's ironic because one would expect that a scientist , who is supposed to help people understand and improve their behavior and decision-making, would be less likely to engage in fraudulent or unethical behavior. The contrast between their knowledge and their actions highlights the complexity of human behavior and the fact that even experts in the field can make choices that contradict their training and expertise. This irony underscores the idea that human behavior can be influenced by a variety of factors, including personal motivations and circumstances…
I think people don’t realize, it’s been this way since the days of Newton
This kind of things happens ALL THE TIME!
Remember when scientists were discovering new elements, instead of writing about honesty pledges?
Trust nothing, question everything.
There's a saying, "Those who can, do; those who cannot, teach." Thucydides wrote, "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." Interestingly, it seems that both of those sayings are no longer just sayings; they are unimpeachable fact.
Thankfully nasa and the history books always tell us the truth just like the majority of the governments 😂
Russia never even tried to debunk it, and it was in their best interest to debunk NASA to keep going the space race to the moon.
But I agree there are weird things in there...
@@hermitcard4494 Well actually I did hear about some Russian journalist who tried to investigate as to how the U.S were able to get men to pass the Radiation belt surrounding the earth, to this day no other country has been able to do oddly enough, with the level of technology they had back then. When he was confronted by the Soviet government to not dig into Nasa, possibly in fear of geopolitical turmoil and complications into the space defense program.
@@hermitcard4494Napoleon said history is a set of lies agreed upon.
They didn't question ours we didn't didn't question theirs.
@@hermitcard4494 it's all the same holding company, just different branches. The powers that be know to not push the space questions. Keep us filled with bread and war
Does anyone have the original footage of the speech’s or talks being given at the 11:45 mark in the video?
Money doesn't have a monopoly on greed. Academic institutions have shown this.
This is exactly why "Trust the science" is one of the most unscientific statements ever made.
She had to have known that none of her results could be replicated. What was the endgame? She knew it’d be discovered. Peer review is something you learn about at uni
Unlike any other field, science is the only stream where you cannot get away with misinformation. you will eventually get caught with their lies and mistakes. this video doesn't make me doubt the science, it just reassures me that science can have objective truth. And people like these investigators can rectify it.
Most naive response award goes to an Indian
You can't get away with misinformation, unless you pay the government well enough
You'll eventually get caught... if someone actually checks you, and decides to catch you. Many studies are never properly examined, replication is never attempted, and journals have the same incentive to cheat as researchers do. Most cheaters are forgotten about, nobody cares enough to check every research paper.
This is an important lesson in using critical thinking instead of just demanding a "source" and blindly following it.
Such a great content this is Jake Tran. No regrets subscribing.
She's living example of how cheaters aren't really creative. She disproved her own study lol.
Biggest waste of taxes. People are being paid good money to study irrelevance. 🤣🤣🤣
These videos are gold.
Not very familiar with phd research paper. But I wonder why people alter answers to support their hypothesis.
If your hypothesis is : I will be rich if I go to casino every night.
And the result proven : my hypothesis is incorrect. Isn’t it also okay to have the result that is to deny my hypotheses ?
well, I don't have to feel like people going to Harvard are superior anymore.
In the end, all that matters is making money and then more money.
Should she be like in jail or fired
You know what would be a good video doing a story about the Southerners who profited off the misery of others during the early part of the 20th century
For some reason hearing no one is going to care about a stupid pledge made my day and I can't stop laughing.
Can U Expose David Sinclair On His Mouse Study. He Claims Aging Is Related To Loss Of Epigenetic Changes Overtime But He Doesn't Talk About Other Factors. He Also Had Made A Fortune Exaggerating His Anti Aging Products.
Journals must require data sharing as a requirement for publication.
I think the problem is she didn't put a pledge on top of her thesis. 😌
The hypothesis (sic) for the cleaning study makes no logical sense regardless of manipulation.
Jake can you do a video on Allen Dulles or brics
We never hear about the scientific community.
The creativity of dishonesty is only limited by imagination and opportunity, as there is no care for good behaviour and such hinderances - for anything but appearances..
One of my class professor has to revised half of his materials when this came out since he used alot of her study
U are back😄😄
Science is the new religion for the masses
It shocks me how little effort she put into faking the results. The cleaning products one was the worst. It would be SO easy to spread the fake numbers among a bunch of students instead of using extreme numbers on just a few students to skew the results.
Additionally, inputting “Harvard” without checking to make sure that was was the paper was asking for is beyond comprehension. Especially when it’s in a spreadsheet. Did she not even glance over the results after she put the fake ones in?
And then she sent these people the clearly fake results for the coin flip one? Oh my god. I don’t understand how a functional human, let alone a HARVARD PROFESSOR, being could be so dumb.
Investigate Regeneron’s FDA research now !
"Science is influenced by secret societies" -National geography
It’s almost like I just rewatched Pete Judo’s documentary on the same exact people
How to: simply conduct a study which no one will bother to replicate, then publish your results. Then, Robert is your father's brother.
I dont get it. Its really really easy to fudge data on an Excel sheet in a way that no one will ever find it. Why did she do it in such an obvious manner?
can you make a video about the current israel war. im just curious to see what you have to say about it
No one talks about the phd student who found the irregularities and contacted the three guys (datacolada)
Does this also affect climate science?
3.03. Behavioral science is grounded on Freudian psychosexual confabulation, Erikson childhood development theory, Bandura Social learning theory and now clinical psychology by the American Psychological Association.
Yet had Freud read Darwin, we would l have been spared 120 years of misdirection 😢.
This is why you shouldn't believe every "according to scientists/researchers" studies.
All the corruption nothing will happen . It's all ridiculous
So this is what it is to be a scientist wasting money on random test lol
Pete Judo (a youtuber) also has a really good video on this topic!! Definitely recommend, as he has himself is an academic!
I think doing this in front of all the clever scientists was a galaxy brain idea to begin with
She was a behavioral scientist for marketing of goods and services.
She discovered nothing new.