One other way to look at this is use time as a scale instead of length. A picosecond is to one second as one second is to approximately 31,689 years. (Wikipedia). It is small but I think we can relate better to a second then a millimeter. Then multiply pico x 1,000 to get to a femto. If m not mistaken a. Crew at MIT was able to achieve either a pico or femto pulse with a laser.
We’re literally a bunch of atoms , learning about a bunch of atoms on a bunch of atoms EDIT: guys this was a simple joke and you all advocating religious conversion down there💀💀 EDIT: Thanks @swenmify for correcting me , we “learn about something “ and we “study something “
I still can't believe that a meter, being about 3 feet long, contains enough space to contain a million hairs parked side by side, That floors me I didn't think it would be a million, maybe like 12,000 hairs would comprise a meter
If the universe is infinitely big, why can’t it be infinitely small? Solar systems, galaxies act a lot like protons and neutrons with electrons orbiting them. Maybe there’s little planets living in each of us lol.
The end of the film Men in black where the aliens are playing marbles with the galaxies/multiverses is probably the best way to describe the two extremes of unimaginably huge to inconceivably small
I always thought what if that’s how the curvature of space actually works? That as we zoom out from our planet its no different than an atom in the spec of a strand of hair. But this fold is in a multitude of dimensions and time so rather than travelling to another location in space you could just shrink.
Just to add - if the atom were the size of a baseball stadium, then the nucleus would be the size of a ping pong ball. So, at the atomic level, there is a massive jump to its nucleus.
@@side5029 relationship is ~0.6-1.1angstrom to ~1.7^-5Angstrom. So roughly a factor of 15000. Very coarse sand is around 2mm. So your baseballfield is about 30m.
@@abc123lov7 Atoms are made up of three main subatomic particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons carry a positive charge, neutrons are electrically neutral, and electrons carry a negative charge. Additionally, there are other subatomic particles such as quarks, which are the building blocks of protons and neutrons, and higher-mass particles like mesons and bosons, which mediate forces between particles. Over 200 subatomic particles have been discovered through particle physics research
Check out quantum computers and mechanics and you see the multiverse probably does exist. Which makes antman even cooler to think about it being based on real science
It still blows my mind as a 30 yr old man that we know this type of detailed information. Everything seems so simple when you go outside and do everyday things.
Know is a strong term. We have good evidence for atomic theory. We cannot see atoms. We can repeat the expected results of their properties put to a test
@@TamaraKane The growth boggles the mind. That the smallest thing can make the biggest thing; feels like an understood universal law AND a silly wizard's joke all at once.😂
@@beetlebob4675 haha. Yes! Science is magic to me! I really don't understand why or how our universe happened or what it's for, but it's all incredible.
There is no such thing as electron orbits, electrons is in superposition it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Its like a wave around atom. And you cannot predict exact place till measurement. You may only assume probability of its position. The closer to the nucleus of an atom, the more likely it is there when we measure it. Nano world is not like things we could see by eyes.
Careful measurements of chemical quantities and ratios lead Dalton to firmly state that atoms exist. Dalton’s cathode ray experiments showed that atoms had parts, starting with the electron. Rutherford’s gold foil experiment showed that the positive parts were in a nucleus which was many orders of magnitude smaller than the atom itself. The SLACC experiments at CalTech in the 60s showed protons have parts, the quark. And many many more experiments. We can now actually see atoms using atomic force microscopy.
I think we have gents from the North of England to thank for that. JJ Thompson and James Chadwick were from Lancashire/Cheshire. They both worked with Ernest Rutherford, although technically from New Zealand his father was Scottish and mother from Essex, but we will forget about the Essex bit!
@@Ketchup_zzzzz between the 3 of them they discovered the electron, neutron and Proton, basically the atom as we know it. Bohrs is still a theory and basically involved how the electron moves around the nucleas in orbits. The players in the atom had already been discovered.
What blows my mind is that this ever shrinking down from hair to atom just goes on forever. Something is always made up of something smaller. As the same happens on the big side of the scale. Like a person to a planet to the universe and so on.
Because CGTN is a chinese news site that is partially or completely funded by the chinese government. CGTNEurope is the European branch of said news company. The fact that it specifies "Europe" should actually be what tells you that it's not a European company, and that it instead has European satellites. Specifying the national origin of the branch of the company that is producing a thing is common when dealing with news companies that are based out of non-European and non-American countries.
@@clairetellkamp6253 and why don't they show that scary warning on the BBC site which is mostly funded by British government? Or on MSNBC is or other channels which make money off of wars directly by the US government?
@@lukaswilliams5851 google my frien, I can't explain the entire thing as I'm not a mathematician by profession but there are 32 pieces in a game of chess and 64 squares to move on, add other variables such as certain pieces being able to move any number of spaces they choose. And remember you could have at least several hundred games that were the exact same except for one move.... It's a very large number my friend like billions of trillions
@@simonmorris-p7m current measuring methods and viewing beyond our current capabilities are the only thing standing in the way of identifying and classifying smaller materials
The concept of understanding infinitely smaller materials can be understood simply by cutting a piece of paper in half, then cut that piece in half and continue to cut each half in half, there is no point in wich the paper can't be split into two pieces regardless of how small the particles are by cutting it in half you can always be 100% certain that there is an equal amount left to the piece removed, it would be silly to think you could ever remove something by taking only half, there is an infinite amount times you can do this, therefore understanding that it's simple to see how we can infinitely zoom in smaller and smaller, so long as we have the technology to view it.
in mass, but not in size. A proton is 1 fm, but an electron is 0, however if you confine it to a space smaller than a hydrogen atom/137, it will generate antimatter.
Very interesting since China cracks down so much on Western social media there. They want to be a part of our social media here, while denying access to our social media there. Funny how that works.
Amazing that we continue to break the building blocks of our world, knowing full well that once broken, these decaying atoms can start other 'normal' matter (atoms) decaying! And we can't stop the atoms from decaying, or fix a single one! The end of our world will be because we have done this.
The word creation implies a creator, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion. You also made several active claims that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.
There is no such thing as electron orbits, electrons is in superposition it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Its like a wave around atom. And you cannot predict exact place till measurement. You may only assume probability of its position. The closer to the nucleus of an atom, the more likely it is there when we measure it.
@@WhoThisMonkeyWhy would it need to do that? Any logic behind that or are you quoting some scientist who was just trying to erase theistic notions by implanting their own head canon into reality and expecting us to be intrigued?
@@WhoThisMonkey This implies a sentience to the Universe, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion. You also made an active claim that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.
Now prove that molecules formed proteins by chance 4 billion years ago, as well as carbohydrates in the exact same place on earth as a fuel source in order to spontaneously emerge as the first living cell Waiting for the proof that such a thing occurred naturally without human interference
"hair cells" Hair isn't made of cells, but mostly keratin. It's basically tiny horns... Or maybe a horn is a giant hair strand? In any case.. "hair cells" are a specific thing in the inner ear. Other wise you have hair follicles and hair grows out of them.
@@Dacentrurus I can sympathize with your curiosity. All I mean to say is that OP clearly doesn't get it. OP is hyper focused on a specific term that OP imagines has only one definition, that only describes one very specific thing. OP imagines that they are clever and wise, that they are in some way, minor or otherwise, smarter than others, quicker than others, or that they may perceive things more deeply or clearly. In reality, OP's mind is sluggish and their vision is cloudy. Moreover their perception is lacking both outward and inward. I called the OP and NPC because in certain cases of simulation theory there are NPCs, just like one might find in a video game. The NPCs don't necessarily realize that they are NPCs but instead carry on through life bumbling about thinking that they understand this or that but when they speak it is apparent to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that they are just running off of their basic programming. No depth. No real reasoning. Just the idea of something and they can't explain how they've arrived there or even what the logical conclusion might be. Furthermore, even when presented with indisputable fact from uncorruptible sources, they refuse to abandon the nonsense that they previously proffered. So they may be referred to as NPCs, bumping off of the walls and carrying on their dialogue scripts even when it makes no sense contextually, or even when the content makes no sense. Obviously it goes deeper than that, and I have other meanings wound into this theme but you'll get the gist from this interaction. Cheers
No, atoms are typically measured in picometers (pm) or angstroms (Å), which are smaller units of length than a femtometer (fm). A femtometer is equal to 10^-15 meters, whereas a picometer is 10^-12 meters, and an angstrom is 10^-10 meters.
@TheBlackmanIsGod this is just wrong, though it's an easy mistake to make. The exponents you listed are correct, but when considering negative exponents the "more negative" exponents means the measurement is smaller. For example, cm are 10^-2 m while mm are 10^-3 m. So, yes, the video WAS correct
I was working at lathe with numerical control nc210 16a20. We produced corpuses for bearings, its accuracy was 10 micrometrs at diameter 150 mm. Machine was so precise that we don't needed grinding...
I once learned, if you scale a hair to the size of a football field an atom has the size of a human hair. Not sure that helps. But... it is pretty small!
That's what I came for 😂 This is obvious signs of a creator and sustainer, it boggles my mind how people can't see, but God says in the Quran about veils being over peoples hearts, so their intellect can't connect the dots
a creator only make sense for us humans who have a start and an end, we grow up around figure authorities so our entire perception of things is that there is something/someone above us, to comfort us or to understand our universe, maybe everything was always here, that there is no limit in time, no limit in size. there is absolutely no proof about a creator or not, we just can't know, can't guess correctly but everything is possible, religion might be totally accurate or totally wrong. or maybe who knows maybe god is actually "allah" because after all we're told the universe started with an explosion :)
@@Typon Scientists unanimously agree that the universe has a beginning, so it must have an end. The question here is: How can something that is unconscious(The universe) create or bring something into this world that is conscious(Humans)?
@@lastsupperapologetics5710 Juses never said i'm god or worship me, all what we find in your bible is Juses saying : "Im goning to my god and your god" "Not my will, but yours be done" and the most important thing he said : "Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the (only) true God " so jesus has god and god can't have god but all you do Christians is following what the church teaches not what Jesus taught
Would it be accurate to presume that if an atom's nucleus was the size of a green pea laying at the middle of the 50 yard line, the closest electron would be a whiff of energy somewhere up in the nose bleed section of the third deck?
There's an error in the graphic, where we zoom into the strand of hair, which is 100um: The zoom isn't enough, resulting in hair "cells" that appear about 80um while the graphic is trying to tell us that they are 10um. Confusing, tsk tsk. Also, hair is composed of protein filaments, not cells as in the graphic. Please correct this misinformation for the public.
FYI, this is a China State Media Channel. 🛑 Misinformation is their Modus Operandi, and they don't acknowledge mistakes. However, their biggest mistake is that UA-cam is 🚫off-limits🚫 behind China's Great *intranet* Firewall - ..and yet 🇨🇳CGTN operate multiple UA-cam channels to launder their propaganda. It's laughable, they are trying to legitimize themselves, drawing views with poorly-regurgitated click-bait "science and education" shorts. 🏚️🧹🧹🌹🇨🇳🌹!
For context. 1 m = 1000 mm and 1 mm = 1000 micrometers and 1 micrometer = 1000 nanometers and 1 nanometer = 1000 femtometers. So a single hair is 1/10 of a mm thick or 100 micrometers. 😊 If you want to know it in USA metrics search it on Google but this is normal people units. 👍🏼
If someone calls you a loser, you would be mad, can't you ever just see a woman without your mind wondering to disgusting stuff? What is wrong with you? get therapy ! Nonsense behavior, your parents didn't do their jobs.
What I find amazing is how much space there is between the nucleus and the electrons and between other atoms. If you compress them all together so that there is no space between them like on a neutron star, a teaspoon of matter weighs several tons.
Props to the lady for staying so still
I think they stole her hair for an experiment, idk why and how they would put a real lady under a microscope
Man it's uber difficult to stand so still that someone can zoom into the nuclues of your hair atom. She should be paid more money.
True man, she has a *mountain* of patience.
@@myriadYT Don't trust him he's lying she wasn't even there, it's just a photo from Google
@@Bilal_is_jokingthats my sister 😡
Just as space is unimaginaly huge, the microverse is just as unimaginaly small. Truly fascinating!
I think a human is about the size of the Milky Way to an electron
Antman vibes
@@hmu05366What does that even mean?
My theory is that our universe is a living being. And each of us are our own universes 😅
@@facelessandnameless it very well could be. Maybe what we will see beyond an atom.
We gonna need a magic schoolbus to reach that nucleus
or my profile pic
This doesn't have anywhere near enough upvotes
Yeah because it's all cartoons anyway.
Challenge accepted
“Pleeeaaase be a normal field trip…”
"One thousandth of a trillion of a meter" my mind cannot comprehend 😂
One quadrillionth of a meter. A millionth of a millionth of a thousandth of a meter.
@@chesterdamolester6990thank you, that’s much better
Process 😂
One other way to look at this is use time as a scale instead of length.
A picosecond is to one second as one second is to approximately 31,689 years. (Wikipedia).
It is small but I think we can relate better to a second then a millimeter.
Then multiply pico x 1,000 to get to a femto.
If m not mistaken a. Crew at MIT was able to achieve either a pico or femto pulse with a laser.
@@danieljohnson2662 and laser exceeded the speed of light in a rare case when gone through cesium steam
The universe is to us what we are to a atom.
If that’s the case, I wonder if our atoms hate each other? Do oxygen atoms hate carbon atoms? 🤔
@@spyterusI see what you did there
As above so below. As within so without. As the universe so the soul...
@@notachannelanymore-y1g how many footballs field / hot dogs more vast shall you say it is?
@@notachannelanymore-y1gis it? There's no knowing that
Hopes and prayers for the camera man to make it back safely from the quantum realm.
*Gets trapped for five hours, sorry, years :)
💯😂
Ant man tried it too
hehehe!
Imagine whole civilisations living down there totally impervious from our giant macro world full of instability and wars.
I still can't grasp how small an atom is
As small as my pp
Then you’re getting it right
Teensy
The size of your brain ? (We'll, it's a joke, you know !)
Well you’d need VERY small hands to grasp an atom
man didnt go all the way down to a plank length 😔
Plank length -- that's about eight feet, isn't it? 😉
@@Milesco My guy my Plank is green, one eyed, live under the sea.
@@Milesco it's actually black, 7 eyed. live in mars
Planck length? I believe that’s about 10^25 times smaller than an atom.
@@Landon-_ that's as small as the intelligence in Washington DC.
We’re literally a bunch of atoms , learning about a bunch of atoms on a bunch of atoms
EDIT: guys this was a simple joke and you all advocating religious conversion down there💀💀
EDIT: Thanks @swenmify for correcting me , we “learn about something “ and we “study something “
Bruh
consciousness is not atoms though
Consciousness is immaterial- one of the proofs that God exists
And electronsand quarks and cellphone
And electrons and quarks and cells
If you made a tardigrade the size of earth, an atom would be the size of a basketball
Nah more like 1 or 2x the size of the moon. Definitely not the size of the earth.
Nah is would be the size of a football stadium with the *nucleus* being the size of a basketball
I don't want earth-devouring water bears,
thank you very much !
@@kbxbrdr1 times the size of the moon is the size of the moon. The math isn’t mathing for you.
😂1 x the size of the moon!!’👀😳🤨😀
That’s great. I ❤it.
It’s amazing how small atoms are yet how much we can find out about their properties using crude, macroscopic experiments
It's used on bombs making
Small? U call that small? Get a grip on life!
@@Z1bi Its used in more than bomb making, it helps us to create electricity and chemical reactions
@@nemiw4429 we know, we know. Nothing beats your pp for smallest thing in the world.
@@Z1biIt's used in literally everything. Atoms make up everything you see. What you think of is likely nuclear fission.
The camera avoided all the hair conditioner molecules.
I still can't believe that a meter, being about 3 feet long, contains enough space to contain a million hairs parked side by side, That floors me I didn't think it would be a million, maybe like 12,000 hairs would comprise a meter
There's a tiny universe down there where Scott Lang have been...
@@raymacouttinho3524 ?
Ant man is f*cking your mind!!!!
ua-cam.com/users/shortsJdTHYzz3BKE?feature=share
@@y...salvador...y1497daddy chill
Only 0.03 % of universe is made of atom
“i want a little off the top.”
“a little? i gotchu”
Barber: So what can I do for you?
Customer: I want to understand Nuclear Physics.
Barber: I got you
Fr😂
🤣
And that's how you have it: Barberheimer cinematic universe 💈
@@a-dwido you know what a pico-meter, nano-meter, pfinto-meter is ?!
Good, back to school 🤣
@@fpostolache why would I? My motivation of finishing them was to get away from genius wannabes like you 🤡
This is basically the opposite of the video were they zoom out to show how small we are. Except this makes us look big
Why is the vid paid by the Chinese government
We're medium sized
@@johncharles.5087Phoenix A 💀
If the universe is infinitely big, why can’t it be infinitely small? Solar systems, galaxies act a lot like protons and neutrons with electrons orbiting them. Maybe there’s little planets living in each of us lol.
I hate to be that guy but the Power of Ten video also went smaller and smaller too at the end
The end of the film Men in black where the aliens are playing marbles with the galaxies/multiverses is probably the best way to describe the two extremes of unimaginably huge to inconceivably small
The fourth film could well be the men in black "fleeing" the universe and going to meet/face these giants 😂
For some reason, I think about that scene often.
That was fantastic.
I always thought what if that’s how the curvature of space actually works? That as we zoom out from our planet its no different than an atom in the spec of a strand of hair. But this fold is in a multitude of dimensions and time so rather than travelling to another location in space you could just shrink.
underrated
Just to add - if the atom were the size of a baseball stadium, then the nucleus would be the size of a ping pong ball. So, at the atomic level, there is a massive jump to its nucleus.
*a grain of sand, not a ping pong ball
@@side5029 relationship is ~0.6-1.1angstrom to ~1.7^-5Angstrom. So roughly a factor of 15000. Very coarse sand is around 2mm. So your baseballfield is about 30m.
That's why neutronium is so very heavy.
Is it safe to say that there are smaller things going on in the nucleus? Is it an infinite inward way of smaller atoms, in the atoms?
@@abc123lov7 Atoms are made up of three main subatomic particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons carry a positive charge, neutrons are electrically neutral, and electrons carry a negative charge. Additionally, there are other subatomic particles such as quarks, which are the building blocks of protons and neutrons, and higher-mass particles like mesons and bosons, which mediate forces between particles. Over 200 subatomic particles have been discovered through particle physics research
the credits of ant man:
Check out quantum computers and mechanics and you see the multiverse probably does exist. Which makes antman even cooler to think about it being based on real science
@@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438do u hv something called sense of humour ?
@@virendraverma8082He's just showing his faccts. Speaking of which, where are your faccts?🤨
They really should give physics lessons in the credits of those movies. Pretty sure every fan would stay if Morgan Freeman narrated it.
@@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438atoms can't be shrunk down even more.... that is simply how the physics of it works...
Big respect to the camera man who even became small for presenting us a new picture of the real atoms....
So you're telling me there's a universe in my hair ? Perfect.
You're a walking multiverse.
👁️👄👁️
If you blew up an atom to the size of the Milky Way Galaxy. A planck length would be equivalent to a small tree on earth.
Wow, I did not know that. Guess I got something cool to tell to others.
wow
Sounds like there is infinity in both directions.
@lrayvick probably, the bible says, "In Him, we move and have our being."
If God is infinite, then this adds up to me.
Pretty small
It still blows my mind as a 30 yr old man that we know this type of detailed information. Everything seems so simple when you go outside and do everyday things.
Know is a strong term. We have good evidence for atomic theory. We cannot see atoms. We can repeat the expected results of their properties put to a test
Nothing is so simple. Even the act of breathing requires the sacrifice of a million cells
Crazy
What I learn today: inside small thread there're smaller thread, inside smaller thread there're small ball, inside small ball there're smaller ball
And imagine, when the nucleus is split, a force of destruction spanning miles can be created. Astonishing.
Wait that's not exactly accurate. Isn't it only the uranium nucleus?
@@WeyardWiz uranium and plutonium. Fission occurs when these atoms are split, generating enormous energy. Still quite crazy how that can happen.
@@TamaraKane
The growth boggles the mind. That the smallest thing can make the biggest thing; feels like an understood universal law AND a silly wizard's joke all at once.😂
@@TamaraKane
Right so not all atoms then just those two
@@beetlebob4675 haha. Yes! Science is magic to me! I really don't understand why or how our universe happened or what it's for, but it's all incredible.
the first vid ive seen where there arent electrons swirling around an atom on a fixed lane xd finally someone uses orbitals for their representation
fr i think the people making these videos just grab their concepts online and are mostly just editors making videos interesting for the people.
❕️
People are catching up.
If to be exactly concise, protons and newtrons mustn't have a clear boundary either. But this's good enough.
They don't actually have a color either
Comparing to a mm rather than a meter seems a lot more helpful
Props for showing a more accurate representation of electron orbits. 👏🏾 👏🏾
There is no such thing as electron orbits, electrons is in superposition it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Its like a wave around atom. And you cannot predict exact place till measurement. You may only assume probability of its position. The closer to the nucleus of an atom, the more likely it is there when we measure it. Nano world is not like things we could see by eyes.
Seeing this really hybridized my p orbital
Why black hands, it's irritating
I can't even imagine how scientists made research on these atoms ? HATS OFF TO THEM 🎉
Well thought out models to explain experimental results, and well thought out experiments to validate said models.
Careful measurements of chemical quantities and ratios lead Dalton to firmly state that atoms exist.
Dalton’s cathode ray experiments showed that atoms had parts, starting with the electron.
Rutherford’s gold foil experiment showed that the positive parts were in a nucleus which was many orders of magnitude smaller than the atom itself.
The SLACC experiments at CalTech in the 60s showed protons have parts, the quark.
And many many more experiments. We can now actually see atoms using atomic force microscopy.
I think we have gents from the North of England to thank for that. JJ Thompson and James Chadwick were from Lancashire/Cheshire. They both worked with Ernest Rutherford, although technically from New Zealand his father was Scottish and mother from Essex, but we will forget about the Essex bit!
@@patricksmith4424 Although they had put their hard efforts to do research on these atoms only Bohr's(Danish Physicist) Model was widely accepted.
@@Ketchup_zzzzz between the 3 of them they discovered the electron, neutron and Proton, basically the atom as we know it. Bohrs is still a theory and basically involved how the electron moves around the nucleas in orbits. The players in the atom had already been discovered.
The microverse within is just as provocative and mysterious as the macroverse without.
Respect to the camera man who grew so tiny to show us the smallest unit
How tf you grow tiny??!
@@crossangels9772It's a meme
We can't see any element's atom till now.we don't have this type of technology. This is only a animation
@@mdraishansari4663he is saying sarcastically fool
@@crossangels9772 grow does not only mean become larger, it can just mean become. "He grew tired"
Neutrinos are crazy to me, if you were the size of the whole observable universe, a neutrino would be the size of a golf ball.
Well I did have pretty big lunch 🥪😮💨
Wow!😮
- IQ
props to the guy who was there to measure it
@@sinajakelic big props
The zoom honestly explains more than any of these units of measure.
Props to the tiny camera man!
Dang your so creative and witty! How do you come up with this kind of material? 😮
What blows my mind is that this ever shrinking down from hair to atom just goes on forever. Something is always made up of something smaller. As the same happens on the big side of the scale. Like a person to a planet to the universe and so on.
Will end up in pure energy
@@josephantony3296 nice. I like that.
@@danwhitehurst9592 i think the minute particle will be a entangled pair of twisted energies.
This taught me more about the measurements than 2 months of intro to chemistry has 😐
Yeah they don’t really talk about that in intro
The nature of the Universe is so stunning.
That’s where employers find the joint I smoked 4 months ago.
Why does UA-cam notify me about "CTGN is partially or completely financed by the Chinese Government"? A UA-cam channel which is called CTGNEurope?
Because CGTN is a chinese news site that is partially or completely funded by the chinese government. CGTNEurope is the European branch of said news company. The fact that it specifies "Europe" should actually be what tells you that it's not a European company, and that it instead has European satellites. Specifying the national origin of the branch of the company that is producing a thing is common when dealing with news companies that are based out of non-European and non-American countries.
Probably to let you know not to trust it. China likes to spread misinformation and negativity
What don't you understand about "Chinese Global Television Network?"
@@michaelwoods8654 The part that doesn't actually say "Chinese Global Television Network" AT ALL, but instead says "CTGN Europe".
@@clairetellkamp6253 and why don't they show that scary warning on the BBC site which is mostly funded by British government? Or on MSNBC is or other channels which make money off of wars directly by the US government?
Kudos to the girl for letting them use her hair .
Wow explained, Superb animated concept.... 🤟
And get this; there’s more different ways to shuffle and arrange a simple deck of cards (52!) than there’s atoms on earth 🤯
Similar fact: there are more possible games of chess than stars in the observable universe.
That means I'll never be able to play every game of Klondike Solitaire! I'm sad.😢
@@danielholland2988that doesnt sound right
@@lukaswilliams5851 google my frien, I can't explain the entire thing as I'm not a mathematician by profession but there are 32 pieces in a game of chess and 64 squares to move on, add other variables such as certain pieces being able to move any number of spaces they choose. And remember you could have at least several hundred games that were the exact same except for one move.... It's a very large number my friend like billions of trillions
@@lukaswilliams5851 It's not right. There are more possibe games of chess than there are atoms in the universe, by far.
"The human imagination starts to get blurry"
So naturally, we will speed up the zoom.
Props to the cameraman for shrinking into an atom
He got a lot of experience on set with the antman movie 🎬
You could continue zooming in forever and never view the smallest point
Except all the concepts of measurement & stuff breaks down eventually, this is the Plank length
I thought atoms are the smallest point?
@@MinecraftKing-nd1zo nope atoms are the current smallest point however it's fairly simple to understand atoms are made of something.
@@simonmorris-p7m current measuring methods and viewing beyond our current capabilities are the only thing standing in the way of identifying and classifying smaller materials
The concept of understanding infinitely smaller materials can be understood simply by cutting a piece of paper in half, then cut that piece in half and continue to cut each half in half, there is no point in wich the paper can't be split into two pieces regardless of how small the particles are by cutting it in half you can always be 100% certain that there is an equal amount left to the piece removed, it would be silly to think you could ever remove something by taking only half, there is an infinite amount times you can do this, therefore understanding that it's simple to see how we can infinitely zoom in smaller and smaller, so long as we have the technology to view it.
Atoms being that small is crazy to think about. You know what’s more crazy? How small electrons are at about 1/1800 of a proton!
in mass, but not in size. A proton is 1 fm, but an electron is 0, however if you confine it to a space smaller than a hydrogen atom/137, it will generate antimatter.
I don’t see any comments mentioning the UA-cam warning that this channel is funded by the Chinese… if anyone else saw that reply to me please
Yes very interesting
saw it too
Who else 😢
Very interesting since China cracks down so much on Western social media there. They want to be a part of our social media here, while denying access to our social media there. Funny how that works.
Big praise to the model to remain stand still while the cameramen zoomed on her hairs
Amazing the fact that we have this knowledge and how much still not known.
Amazing that we continue to break the building blocks of our world, knowing full well that once broken, these decaying atoms can start other 'normal' matter (atoms) decaying! And we can't stop the atoms from decaying, or fix a single one! The end of our world will be because we have done this.
As a science student I was expecting he would go more deeper into protons and neutrons to show is quarks and gluons😆. Nice video btw ❤
The universe is and infinite ♾️ loop from the smallest structure in creation to galactic super clusters. It's your favorite song on repeat forever
There are different Atoms? It depends on the subatomic materials, the Electrons, the Protons and the Neutrons, what material they form.
Woah👏 this is underrated
Uh no
uni verse = one song
❤
The word creation implies a creator, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion.
You also made several active claims that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.
He didn’t show the cross on mobile game ads!
Lol
Fr bruh
Wow you actually used proper visualisation for electron orbitals!!
There is no such thing as electron orbits, electrons is in superposition it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Its like a wave around atom. And you cannot predict exact place till measurement. You may only assume probability of its position. The closer to the nucleus of an atom, the more likely it is there when we measure it.
I for some reason imagined myself with a bunch of big red and white nucleus on my head
😂😂
Most people don’t think about how it works.
At the fundamental quantum level we are just ideas. We are energy fields earnestly being something.
I like the way you worded that, very interesting
Maybe life is just a way for the universe to know itself. 🤷🏼♂️
@@WhoThisMonkeyWhy would it need to do that? Any logic behind that or are you quoting some scientist who was just trying to erase theistic notions by implanting their own head canon into reality and expecting us to be intrigued?
@@WhoThisMonkey This implies a sentience to the Universe, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion.
You also made an active claim that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.
@@Goujiki
Notice the key word 'Maybe.'
I made no active claim. 🤦🏻♂️
Intriguing but moreover it is incredibly fascinating
*You know what's even smaller?*
_....the chances that E didn't off himself._
An even smaller thing is yo
Wat is e 😊
This is also mentioned in Bhagwat Geeta 😊❤ Hare Krishna
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
@@Luketa1978 just go n check..... then do Ahahaha....🤣🤣🤣
Truly amazing design of creation..
Mine is still smaller😔
Congratulations for cameraman, again making an amazing job
شكرا على هذه المعلومات ، نهاركم سعيد من المغرب 🇲🇦🙏❣️
How many quadrillionths of an atom is morrocan
@@stephenzaccardelli5863 sorry bro , don't understand ur question
"That of the human HERE"
I was looking for this comment 😂
Whatta amazing, I'm hugely interested in this
Chemistryyyy
Now prove that molecules formed proteins by chance 4 billion years ago, as well as carbohydrates in the exact same place on earth as a fuel source in order to spontaneously emerge as the first living cell
Waiting for the proof that such a thing occurred naturally without human interference
Props to cameraman for having such a stable hand. Not as easy as it looks when zoomed that far in
"hair cells"
Hair isn't made of cells, but mostly keratin. It's basically tiny horns... Or maybe a horn is a giant hair strand?
In any case.. "hair cells" are a specific thing in the inner ear. Other wise you have hair follicles and hair grows out of them.
Hair forms from stem cells. It's made up of "keratinized cells".
And? Still made of atoms.
Another NPC just has to speak. Smh
You know your dialogue is restricted but you just speak anyway. Poor NPC.
@@goodcitizen3780what the heck are you saying
@@Dacentrurus
I can sympathize with your curiosity.
All I mean to say is that OP clearly doesn't get it. OP is hyper focused on a specific term that OP imagines has only one definition, that only describes one very specific thing.
OP imagines that they are clever and wise, that they are in some way, minor or otherwise, smarter than others, quicker than others, or that they may perceive things more deeply or clearly.
In reality, OP's mind is sluggish and their vision is cloudy. Moreover their perception is lacking both outward and inward.
I called the OP and NPC because in certain cases of simulation theory there are NPCs, just like one might find in a video game. The NPCs don't necessarily realize that they are NPCs but instead carry on through life bumbling about thinking that they understand this or that but when they speak it is apparent to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that they are just running off of their basic programming. No depth. No real reasoning. Just the idea of something and they can't explain how they've arrived there or even what the logical conclusion might be. Furthermore, even when presented with indisputable fact from uncorruptible sources, they refuse to abandon the nonsense that they previously proffered.
So they may be referred to as NPCs, bumping off of the walls and carrying on their dialogue scripts even when it makes no sense contextually, or even when the content makes no sense.
Obviously it goes deeper than that, and I have other meanings wound into this theme but you'll get the gist from this interaction.
Cheers
No, atoms are typically measured in picometers (pm) or angstroms (Å), which are smaller units of length than a femtometer (fm). A femtometer is equal to 10^-15 meters, whereas a picometer is 10^-12 meters, and an angstrom is 10^-10 meters.
Riiiiiggghhhttt.... I was gonna say the same thing
Larger bro. Larger*
@TheBlackmanIsGod this is just wrong, though it's an easy mistake to make. The exponents you listed are correct, but when considering negative exponents the "more negative" exponents means the measurement is smaller. For example, cm are 10^-2 m while mm are 10^-3 m. So, yes, the video WAS correct
MINUS!!!!!!
I was working at lathe with numerical control nc210 16a20. We produced corpuses for bearings, its accuracy was 10 micrometrs at diameter 150 mm. Machine was so precise that we don't needed grinding...
Vin Diesel doesn't get it.
Would have been more awesome if this was narrated by Morgan Freeman.
I once learned, if you scale a hair to the size of a football field an atom has the size of a human hair. Not sure that helps. But... it is pretty small!
Shout-out to the camera man who stole the shrink ray from gru to shrink himself to film all of this for us
Crickets....
How can anyone not realize that there is a Creator behind this great and accurate creation !??
That's what I came for 😂
This is obvious signs of a creator and sustainer, it boggles my mind how people can't see, but God says in the Quran about veils being over peoples hearts, so their intellect can't connect the dots
@@timpinkstone6093 Yeah , may Allah guide them and enlighten their hearts
a creator only make sense for us humans who have a start and an end, we grow up around figure authorities so our entire perception of things is that there is something/someone above us, to comfort us or to understand our universe, maybe everything was always here, that there is no limit in time, no limit in size. there is absolutely no proof about a creator or not, we just can't know, can't guess correctly but everything is possible, religion might be totally accurate or totally wrong. or maybe who knows maybe god is actually "allah" because after all we're told the universe started with an explosion :)
@@Typon Scientists unanimously agree that the universe has a beginning, so it must have an end. The question here is: How can something that is unconscious(The universe) create or bring something into this world that is conscious(Humans)?
@@lastsupperapologetics5710 Juses never said i'm god or worship me, all what we find in your bible is Juses saying : "Im goning to my god and your god"
"Not my will, but yours be done"
and the most important thing he said : "Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the (only) true God "
so jesus has god and god can't have god but all you do Christians is following what the church teaches not what Jesus taught
Big day for Griffith, got his own unit of measurement.
Here before the video explodes.
Would it be accurate to presume that if an atom's nucleus was the size of a green pea laying at the middle of the 50 yard line, the closest electron would be a whiff of energy somewhere up in the nose bleed section of the third deck?
Can you please speak English and not American?
😮mind blowing 😮😮
There's an error in the graphic, where we zoom into the strand of hair, which is 100um: The zoom isn't enough, resulting in hair "cells" that appear about 80um while the graphic is trying to tell us that they are 10um. Confusing, tsk tsk.
Also, hair is composed of protein filaments, not cells as in the graphic.
Please correct this misinformation for the public.
yeah, they're just crossfading to the next graphic and barely zooming in, rendering the visualisations pointless
FYI, this is a China State Media Channel. 🛑
Misinformation is their Modus Operandi, and they don't acknowledge mistakes.
However, their biggest mistake is that UA-cam is 🚫off-limits🚫 behind China's Great *intranet* Firewall -
..and yet 🇨🇳CGTN operate multiple UA-cam channels to launder their propaganda.
It's laughable, they are trying to legitimize themselves, drawing views with poorly-regurgitated click-bait "science and education" shorts.
🏚️🧹🧹🌹🇨🇳🌹!
SubhanAllah Allah create this so accurate.
For context.
1 m = 1000 mm and 1 mm = 1000 micrometers and 1 micrometer = 1000 nanometers and 1 nanometer = 1000 femtometers.
So a single hair is 1/10 of a mm thick or 100 micrometers. 😊
If you want to know it in USA metrics search it on Google but this is normal people units. 👍🏼
Giantess🥵!
If someone calls you a loser, you would be mad, can't you ever just see a woman without your mind wondering to disgusting stuff? What is wrong with you? get therapy ! Nonsense behavior, your parents didn't do their jobs.
do better😐
Mashallah
WOW look at all the space between everything.
👍
props to the air as well for staying so still
This animation is taken from CERN UA-cam video, title is called the Voyage Into The World of Atoms.
Absolutely incredible
What I find amazing is how much space there is between the nucleus and the electrons and between other atoms. If you compress them all together so that there is no space between them like on a neutron star, a teaspoon of matter weighs several tons.
The cameraman never dies fr
I like how the periodic table looks so organized (Design) and how although atoms seem to make sense of the world, it's still just a theory.
And to think atoms are EVERYTHING! so cool.
Thats why always you should say الحمد لله و الشكر لله ❤️
That clears it up
Unimaginably and unfathomably smol
I don't understand how the universe operates so well using building blocks that are so incredibly small. The GPU of reality must be incredible.
it's like solid reality is made of non-solid energy
Atomic diminished small and also very powerful😊😊😊
Literally mind blowing 🥶
Props to the camera men that filmed the atoms
Para lo micro y lo macro igual, inimaginable!!!