Canon EOS R5 | Full Camera Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
- I never normally review a camera to this level, but the R5 is so significant and packed with special features that I couldn't resist this time. Hope you find this helpful!
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link):
geni.us/canone...
Video footage and pictures of the camera taken with a Sony a7R II, but all the sample pictures and video you see are of course taken with the Canon EOS R5, with Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART and 60-600mm SPORTS lenses adapted on.
Support me on Patreon! / christopherfrost
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonE...
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonE...
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma5...
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonR...
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/Marumi...
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020...
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSm...
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC...
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1...
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMin...
Music:
'Sidewalk Shade', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons....
I appreciate reviewers who actually USE cameras (for more than a few hours) before reviewing them
Same. If there's one thing I've learnt about Chris from his channel, other than that his wife loves him dearly (see the way she looks at him even with a camera in his hand) is that he's a stickler for thoroughness. He'd rather be last but with substance rather than first with nothing to say.
same - and "photographers" that actually use and review the camera for Photography aka Stills Photography and not Videography or Filmmaking, if i want to get top brass in cinecams i'd buy a RED ... but i want a compact STILLS camera and reviews that not only show the addon feature of being able to record video - but use it for its primary function - taking stills.
same here
I tested it at the Best Buy for 10 min before writing my review. 💪🏼
I wonder why you have avoided Reviewing Cameras till now. Your Lens reviews are the best but this review is up there with the best camera reviews. I think you should start doing this more. AWESOME.
Thanks! The reason I avoid camera reviews is because they take me about four times longer to make than lens reviews, and I'm so pressed for time.
@@christopherfrost I understand. I have to say, your findings and observations are unique and add value even though there are many detailed reviews available, Drop these gems once in a while
@5:18 I thought that mirrorless cameras already had live DoF preview so I'm not sure why that button is needed.
@@Rollergold4 Canon cameras don't
@@christopherfrost It is a little obnoxious, but I think it's to give the sensor enough light for the autofocus to work well. Still, it would sure be nice to get away from this soon. Maybe with the R1?
Enough R5 fake-overexcited reviews,its time for real review
Thanks Chris
Why don't camera companies send you the review units or you just purposely don't want to? I mean, you're the first guy on UA-cam I would prefer for reviews.
There's a very good way to thank him for doing all this incredible work: by clicking on every single ad that you see on the channel :)
He can't say it, but he gets a ton of money if we do so.
Thanks mate! Keep up!
He's got a Patreon you can donate too. It's easier and can be a bigger monetary contribution than AdSense.
@@ej_tech I know, but not every one is willing to be a patreon. It costs nothing to add another click to your day :)
Nope, he won't get tons of money through ads. You'll have to have view up in the millions to have any significant income.
@@jan.tichavsky Full disclosure: I have so many reviews on UA-cam now that advertising does make an income for me. But like everyone else - I have bills and a mortgage to pay, and a new family to take care of :-)
@@christopherfrost Just subbed to your Patreon Chris. I'm Unemployed so I'm only on the $2 tier but I just felt the need to support what I consider to be the best reviews not only in photography, but possibly in any genre.
I love your standardised testing format, the calm tone and subtle humour, the classic smooth jazz, and the constantly concise, earnest and both technical and artistic advice you add to your work. and then you test them on APSC/full frame/vice versa too?? I don't think I've ever bought a lens that you haven't tested.
Also love the addition of suggestions for alternative lenses / items if you see an issue thats resolved by a competitor. You should be immensely proud of your work. If only every product category had a Christopher Frost.
The dream camera, i´m saving money for the R6 it will be a real upgrade for me, canon has something really awesome in this cameras.
Most will choose R6, at least in Europe where price difference is 40% more that in US.
@@tkermi Woah.
@@Methodical2 Yeah, in US dollars R6 costs here $3435 and R5 $5750. So the price difference is $2315...
If you have to save to buy the camera that means you can’t really afford it.
@@Ishijah1 Or the person is just being responsible about how he/she uses money. Only quite few people have so much money that they don't need to give any thought about $2,5k ($3,4k in Europe) purchase.
The review we’ve ALLL been waiting for
I hear you. Tough to find a positive review.
I just bought the R5, it rocks!! What blows my mind is that I spent a month or two watching UA-cam videos and researching the camera and this video is just being recommended to me now! WTF UA-cam?!?!?!? My favorite reviewer doing the best review of the R5 and I'm just seeing it now!!?? I watched it twice! Great job as always Chris! You nailed it exactly (and then some)! Best reviews on YT!!
Beautiful review! Just thought I should mention that the 4K aps-c crop mode looks really good, and is downsampled from 5,1K. It also never overheats.
I've seen a lot reviews about this camera but this was one of the better ones. Your mastery of photography and tech details is so good that you don't have to try so hard like a lot of other reviewers. Instead, you just pointed out the key features and issues. Nice work! Can't wait to put this camera to the test. One question: do you notice any appreciable difference in the color of images straight out of this camera compared to the EOS R?
AllGoodThingsNetwork it is a little cooler. I have both
@@pianofinger I heard that in a different review on YT as well. I currently have both as well and need to test this out. Thanks.
I noticed my images were slightly more red in some situations
I just love my R5 and RF lenses - Congratulations!
Thank you Chris for the best R5 Review so far, I have watched almost 100+ reviews but found your review much more helpful then other
Nice. You managed to talk about two features i didn’t know were in the camera and i have had mine since august 1 and called myself reading the manual. Interesting to know there is yet another IS problem too with a lens i own, as well! Thanks for the review.
I bought mine 3 weeks ago along with the F4.0 70-200mm and I have to say OMG. OMG what an amazing camera :)
I really like this style of reviews where the focus is actually on the product.
Mr. Frost, you are one of my favorite UA-cam reviewers. Great job as always.
There's no other camera in the world that i want more.
The old a7rii hold its own in the video department quite well....very surprising. It would be even better in Super35.
Yeah , not bad for a now 5 plus year old camera , the thing that comes to mind looking at all these camera reviews to me is that , all cameras have their strong and weak points , while it is easy to get carried away with the latest and greatest wizz bang models(and the grass is always greener .... ) , , if you have an old model that is still competent and with a good lens , you can still get great images and media .
I look at some of the good photo`s i have taken with my A73 , and i see no reason too spend 4 or 5 grand , or 6.5 grand in this case on another new camera body , and then a lens or two and in my region that in all honesty is only going to give very fractional improvement in image quality for the most part unless you are a pro or blowing up to poster size to sell or pixel peeping .
Great review Christopher. You brought some new details to light for me like the softness when using the fully mechanical shutter and the 1/8 stop aperture increments. 👌
Did they fix the problem?
This channel and camera conspiracies are the only review channels worth watching on UA-cam.
Hey, Chris. Have I ever mentioned how I love your calm and well balanced reviews? Thanks for that. I am glad got the R5; not because you will be testing RF lenses, but because you are owning such a great camera. Enjoy!
Watching this review i guess CF is a photographer that does video as well which is like 90% of us and that's why we relate to his vids ..its seams 90% of youtubers are Videographers
Well they do make videos... but alas a lot of them just ride the overheating wagon for views.
So glad you go the R5, happy to see more rf lens reviews :)
I can't wait to test some lenses on that 45mp sensor :-)
@@christopherfrost can you predict if the lenses will perform better or worse on a 45MP sensor than on a smaller sensor? Or is it not possible to say than in general?
@@patrick.771 a bigger MP camera like the R5 will better review how sharp a lens really is, compared to say a smaller 20mp camera like the R6
patrick771 I have the R5 and the rf 28-70, 70-200 and the 85 1.2. They look so much better on the R5 then the R which I also still have as my second camera .
Are you gonna review the R6? I bet most people here will go for the "budget" version.
Love your reviews, keep it up!
Yes, in US the price difference is "only" $1400 but at least in my country it's 2000€. And I guess that when A7 IV comes out it will affect more on the R6 price. So I'm very interested in R5 - R6 comparisons.
The R6 is for plebs. Just enjoy the review and become a patron.
CBTheMechanic On the planet I’m from a mirroless cam which basically has the 1dxiii internals for less than half the price is pretty awesome.
I dont see the R6 as a "budget R5". I see it as an option for a different market.
I hope Canon lend him the R6 for a while and he make a review for it.
Thanks for the amazing review, been following you for many years now, very clear and concise, very pleasing review, your review gave me the confidence to finally sell my 5dmk4 and order the R5, really looking forward to using it for many years to come.
Chris, an excellent review as always. You have a beautiful backyard at 20:00. It reminds me of the good memories of my childhood.
Hey Chris - your review is actually the first "full" review ive seen so far - the others i watch (Jared Polin and Tony Northrup) all only focussed on the video features so far and are holding back their full review - yet im only interested in the "stills" part of the camera - while owning my 6Dmkii now for 2.5 years i never took a single video with it :D ...
The only downside i see with the r5 is that its so prohibitivly expensive, clocking in a 4580$ here in switzerland (thats with the mandatory EF adapter), technically i could afford it but it feels very "wasty" - yet the R6 with its 20mp feels somehow... held back by the 20mp for a landscape photographer like me. I crop often, as in always, at least 20% and thats just format change... I hope that they will lower the price in a year or so to something reasonable. that said, this comment comes from a hobbyist and not someone that earns money with his photography, so my way of rating things is very different and price has a value of its own.
Still greate review as always!
I just hope one day youll show us how you do your focus char test on those 600mm lenses, or is your garden just so long? :-D
Gordon Laing from camera labs did a photograpby review.
4580$ is... just... so much money
As I am waiting on my R5 to arrive I have watched a ton of videos on it. In that time I have gone from excited to disappointed to excited. Your review of this camera was what I was hoping for, well done!
Just a great review . THANK YOU Christopher. I was buying the NIKON Z 7 2, but a 6 week wait just didn't cut it for me. My Sony 7 R stopped working and needed a new camera. I went to Adorama and was ready to just buy the NIKON , and was browsing around the Canon counter. Picked up the camera just for fun, as the price tag was prohibitive, and fell for it because of the ergonomics. I was trading in a lot of my equipment so it ended up costing me $1400. I must say the pictures are amazing. NOTHING to correct boost or sharpen. WOW. There are a lot of buttons I need to learn and functions but a little patience anything can be done.
Nice review Christopher. And the background music has me feeling like I'm in an old restaurant waiting for my pot of tea. I need to spend more time taking photos, but the EF 50 f1.2 on this camera is amazing. In video, when recording in temps of 65F or lower, I can filled up 328 GB CF cards and not even get an overheat warning.
same here. I have the RP and 7D and didn't do much videos at all other than use RP as web cam.
It's just much lighter to do video on cell phones. I think R5 or R6 will be my next buy...and the RF 70-200.
I just love to have IBIS and it will make all my non stabilized canon fix lens much more useful.
The 4K work flow is already time consuming. 8K will be a killer for my computer.
Dear Chris, Your reviews are always matter-of-fact and focused. When I want to know more about a particular product I always check your review. Well done!
You've got this review all wrong Christopher. You should start with the overheating issue and then never stop talking about it!
I 100% agree with your assessment that Canon marketed the 5R in a frankly bizarre way. This is a stills camera with added bonus of high quality video.
As a Canon shooter I think the R5 suits me perfectly apart from the cost, but I am working on that...
Thank you for the calm, real world review.
Its the best camera I have ever used. If you shoot in ambient temps of 65 degrees F or less - you likely will never overheat the camera. Even in 8K. For long form recording I point a small and silent usb powered fan at the ports, and it will record in all modes forever that way. Even in ambient temps up to about 80 degrees F.
Are you absolutely sure about that? If so you should make a video to demonstrate it for everyone. Serious professional technicians have been looking into the issue and not been able to fix it...
Christopher Frost Photography Yes. I have personally tested it myself. Many others as well. Multiple posts with pictures of times on the Canon Rumors Discord. I have filled my 512GB Cf Express Card after shooting over one hour of 8k IPB Video in a 79 degree room, with a silent USB fan pointed at the ports. I have repeated this test many times. It also works with 4kHQ, and 4K 60. I shot 4 sequences of 4K 120 this way and stopped because who needs 30 total minutes or more of continuous 4K 120. Many others have not even needed the fan if they shoot in 70 degree F or cooler. See the Ordinary Filmmaker. This is all with firmware 1.1. Also the UA-cam channel No Life has posted his videos with a small fan essentially recording 8k forever.
Hi Christopher, as usual a great review which I used to help me make a decision back in the day. I have had the R 5 for 2 years, I wonder if you feel an updated review maybe a good idea now, in view of all the firmware updates that have hopefully addressed many of the issues, particularly as this is still very much a current model?
You are one of my most favorite camera tech reviewer. You deserve more subscribers
Thanks for waiting a month to gather your thoughts for your review. I prefer this over straight-out-of-the-box type reviews, where the reviewers always seem overly excited and sometimes insincere. I think I'll be trading in my EOS R and buying an R5 to replace it, I'm so glad they got rid of the stupid multifunction bar and replaced it with a joystick! That was easily my biggest annoyance with the EOS R (I had a 5D MK2 prior to it). I'm mostly a stills shooter so the R5's shortcomings in video mode don't really affect me.
Great review as usual Christopher. We really need a Sony a9 (II) vs R5/6 AF sports comparison. I would lend you my a9 II however I live in Australia so a little bit far for a loaner.
I've seen a few comparisons and the R5 holds its own with the a9 cameras for sports shooting.
I agree. That would be a great comparison. Those are the cameras I'm interested in.
Lucky to have had it for five weeks already! I placed an order over six weeks ago and it looks like it will be Oct or Nov at the earliest before I receive mine. Great review, as always.
THE BEST REVIEW FOR THIS CAMERA. PERIOD.
Bravo Christopher! Another excellent review. If you had it to do over again - this of the Sony A7R IV?
Best reviewer ever in GB
Hello, Christopher. Delighted to have discovered your videos via this outstanding and intelligent review of the R5, which I'm hoping to make my next EOS purchase. So many nuggets you point out which have added more conviction to that purchase. Among them, so happy to learn that Canon has graciously acknowledged the fact that occasionally we EOS shooters have occasionally chosen to purchase aftermarket lenses such as Sigma ART, by including optimization for such lenses. Also delighted to see demonstrated just how effective the IBIS is on the R5. This is such a USEFUL review, I plan to watch it again (as my birthday - READ: Excuse to purchase sooner rather than later - approaches). It is so welcome to view camera reviews that are reasoned and devoid of noisy hype. Also, I appreciated your good taste in your music background. Needless to say, I have subscribed, and will look forward to viewing more of your work.
A review of the R5 for stills? FINALLY!
I just ordered this camera cuz I wanted to get into mirrorless but not pay the super high end price of the R3. After I ordered it I went into watching reviews on it and when I came across your channel I remembered I watched a lot of your videos back when I bought my first camera. Especially the weather sealing was one of my points I wasn‘t too sure about from reading it up on the internet. Thanks for talking about it too! So from all I heard in your video I‘m even more excited to get it into my hands and I‘m sure it will be a major upgrade over my 90D I‘ve used for a couple years now. Can‘t wait! Edit: I read the overheating issue in 8K video shooting has been adressed in firmware. Is it a different story now?
Well Christopher I must say, this is some fabulous review work. Really excelled yourself here. Made the R5 look like a better buy than most other big name UA-cam camera reviewers and correctly identified Canon mismarketed this as the 8K video beast when the real draw was actually the quite breathtaking stills performance. Really, you've pointed out some features like the partial F stopping that other reviewers just missed. Seems rather non-biased as well.
Bravo. The only problem is I want one now, where I hadn't previously. 🤔🙄😂
Thanks! Full-disclosure - the thing about it being mis-marketed was originally Gerald Undone's thought - his reviews are really excellent
@@christopherfrost I agree. You, him, Potato Jet and Epic Light Media are my go tos for good photography and videography tips and reviews. 👌
@@christopherfrost Gerald Undone is a Sony Schill who makes useless tests in his parents' basement where he lives. If the mis-marketing thing he said was true, the R5 wouldn't be the best selling camera of 2020 as it is.
Best reviewer ever I like native speaker reviews
Really like the moment when the CFexpress card pop out and you see Sony ! reminding me the a7SIII :)
He he. I love those Tough memory cards, and they're so fast.
I also already have the R5 for a few weeks and I am loving it. It's just an all around amazing photo camera.
Are you planning to retest the sharpness of the RF lenses you have already covered on this higher resolution body?
Question- What is the better option for concert photography ? I shoot small venues such as rap concerts and solo shows. (dark environments) . The A7RV or Canon R5?
Yes, I am - videos coming soon :-)
Thanks for your detailed review!
I have been waiting for your review to judge if I want to consider this as my new camera. You can clearly notice the ammount of work that has been put into the video!
The thing I'm missing (even it's topic is maybe better off in a second video) is how the R5 works with older EF (and maybe even EF-S) lenses. As far as I know, both should work for this camera.
Here's a thought about stabilization tests. Rather than just testing the maximum shutter speed of the camera, stabilized, and compare that to the reciprocal rule, also test the camera unstabilized. The reason for this is that you are assuming you will get a sharp image with the reciprocal rule shutter speed, which is often untrue on high megapixel cameras.
For instance, say you are shooting on a 50mm lens. You find that, with stabilization, you get sharp images at around 1/25, so you conclude the camera has 1 stop of stabilization. However, if you were to test the camera unstabilized, you may find out that you only get sharp images at around 1/200, so you are actually getting 3 stops of stabilization, not just 1.
The reciprocal rule is a thing from the film days, and although helpful on 24-megapixel cameras, they are a bit slow for higher megapixel cameras.
Using this method also bypasses the idea of having stable hands or not, as your 'base metric' (unstabilized tests) is based on your own hands as well, not some rule.
Edit: also, the way you said "Bokeh" at 14:06 is amazing :P
This is the best review I saw of this camera.
I have R5 for almost a month now Love it love it 😍
One of the best reviews of the r5. Well done!
When Chris can be bothered to make a camera review, you'd already know it's worth buying.
Brilliant review Chris. So much detail in here. Could never justify buying one but it's certainly am amazing camera that I'm interested in learning more about. And great to see Aberporth getting a look in as well as Llangrennog!
love your videos Chris. i have bought my lenses after watching your videos. i was planning on buying the R6. can you do a video on them as well?
canon got to keep you you tubers happy !!!!
Wow! The stabilisation for still photos looks amazing! Which is the biggest reason why I have one on order, so this was a very reassuring video :-)
Chris, really nice review. Thank you for your work!
I’m a metro Phoenix area native.. loving the ASU shirt... 👍👍👍
The video review is also good.
Wow thanks for this! I learned more than a lot of more popular reviews especially about the battery! Thanks Christopher!
Finally, the best review of EOS R5.
Finaly the best reviewer, reviewing the R5.
Great review and you covered all the bases as usual. It is funny that whilst some videographers are whining about the overheating (which for most people is really a non-issue), I agree with you that the standard 4K is disappointing in its quality. If Canon can improve that in firmware they really have the complete camera.
I hoped it was an A7RIV, but I do understand the choice, now you have a pretty much level playing field for the big full frame players resolution wise going forward!
That's my way of thinking in not upgrading to the a7R IV :-) I think the 40mp area is a great resolution to test lenses, you get to challenge their performance, but it's not too far away from 24mp for those who shoot on lower resolution cameras.
With a good LP-E6N battery, you also can achieve the 12 fps! They may not last as long as an NH battery, but in a pinch, they are useful! I hope you find a way to retest those RF lenses you looked at on the R, as there are a few features that are missing in some of them. For example, on the r5, there is that icon for IS that is enhanced on the r5 due to IBIS (I think) and you get the "hand+" icon in the VF rather than just the "hand". I think, IIRC, that this (hand+) means the two are working together. I had assumed this were true for all RF lenses, but apparently not. That feature does not work with the RF 24-105 F/4L or the RF 70-200 F/2.8L but it does work with the new RF 100-500 F/4.5-7.1L lens. So, I guess the combined IS (hand+) only works with RF lenses released recently and after/with the R5/R6.
Good camera in the winter months, keep your hands warm!! Canon did not market the R5 wrong they created a camera not fit for purpose. If a device has functionality it should work as described, if it doesn't work as described it clearly has design faults.
I so look forward to seeing reviews of the R5 as a stills camera. As always Chris your reviews are thorough and easy to understand. May I also say you remind me of Joaquin Phoenix.... with an English accent
Excellent review, especially the way you handled the comparison of video modes.
R5 with 24-105 L is 6700$ in my country , avarage monthly salary is 400$ so I can only watch videos of it :(
Which country do you live in?
Christopher Frost Photography Unfortunately Turkey , our money losing its value , wages are not high either
It is so irritating that everyone was so skeptical about Canon even being able to produce 8K and 4K120 full width. They did it and then everybody is upset because it heats up. I even heard several of these pundits say that it can do 3-10 minutes it will be a success, and then when cry because it isn't unlimited. What a bunch of whiny babies.
The problem isnt, that it overheats, the problem is, that the overheating is fake. I will overheat even if completely cooled and even after shotting only fotos it wont allow you to film anymore but you can trick it by changing the date and removing the battery without turning it off and all timers will reset until it actually overheats, which will even have a new different overheating icon. This is just pure BS and people are rightfully upset.
@@alexaudiovisuals Except that you nor they don't know that internal, non-obvious damage isn't be done to the camera. I will not ever buy a used R5/R6.
Agree, I don't think anyone would thank Canon if their R5 melted down because they were not cautious. I'm a Canon shooter for many a year but I agree they pushed the video specs too much and it just played into the 'Canon Cripple Hammer' theory Like Chris said it should have been marketed as a '5D Mk V' with a bump in video specs. For me it would be a great stills camera but I object to the $1=£1 then add another £300 for the R5. It can drop in price to a fair price over 2-3 years as far as I'm concerned. As I've never had IBIS and I'm a Landscales shooter the R is fine for me and allows me time tog et into the RF lenses.
Bingo. Many were saying the 8K would be a 30 second burst, or 4k 120 would not have AF. Then they got much more than that and complained. Then these same complainers (like Camera Conspiracies) got the cameras and were unable to get them to overheat in their extensive use.
The same people ridiculed at Sony when it overheated but when the same thing happens to them.
had an R5 and it overheated in Arizona...... I sold it and still shoot with my Canon 5DSR and my for video I use my 1DX MKiii .......
Best 👍 Review of this Canon R5 on UA-cam and I've seen them all
R5 dynamic range is 1.3 Stops better than my Eos R,it is also 0.2 better than Z7 and A7r4,R5 is monster,it has very clean shadows...this is not Dynamic test range that you have done in your video ,you have only tested the highligts recovery,shadow recovery is another story with R5,and also R5 and R6 does not have the faulty sensor as R and 5d mark IV which produces pretty bad banding into the long exposure-exposed for the hightligts photos.
Hi Chris, a great review of the R5. I had Canon gear, 7D II, 5DIV, 500 f4 II etc and had no problem moving to Panasonic G9 some two years ago. However the G9 is not a good wildlife camera that's why I am looking at the R5. One problem you mentioned, image blackout and a knocking sound, well I had this with the G9. It was the sensor/ibis which on the G9 is a combined unit and it was replaced under warranty. Some of the other problems you incurred will hopefully be improved with updated firmware.
Christopher, as always your knowledge of the Canon camera menu systems is second to none.. A brilliant video, indeed...!!! No click bait here. LOL! Hopefully, you will be able to compare the R5 to the R6 in the near future. Thanks again..
Welcome back to Canon! I was missing your channel :)
I never stopped testing Canon gear :-)
@@christopherfrost hmm as I'm following you since a long time, I noticed many Sony stuff and very few Canon these last times until the very last test of the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS 'II' USM. That's why I'm glad of this R5 review (even if I stay with a 5D mark IV... maybe one day R series ?... I love DSLRs). Keep up the good job ;)
great book collection
Finally a proper review of the R5!
Canon showed this in stock on thier website today so I ordered it. We'll see when it shows up.
Great review! Would love your review on he R6 as that is more the price point and mp size I was looking for.
Always a methodical and comprehensive review from Mr. Frost.
How does he get the menu recorded directly from the camera?
Using an external recorder
i hope to see a good long term review of this camera. in summer. either in the city or the dessert/parks or the usual outdoor wedding locations; and not indoors in air conditioned rooms.
Such a great review. I'm still waiting for my camera. How well do the Sigma lenses do with the camera and adapter for photography? I might have missed it in the video.
I've been using a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART lens adapted on and for stills and videos it's absolutely fantastic
Dynamic range is the reason why I am a Nikon shooter, though I must admit this camera is impressive.
This new Canon sensor is actually finally very, very close to the DR that Sony/Nikon have. At lowest ISO it has even better DR that those. Nikon sensors are made by Sony but I don't know if they have something added to them but I doubt that.
@@tkermi The better DR R5 has at lower isos is because canon is baking in a slight amount of noise reduction at low isos (till iso 640) into the raw file. Actual DR is still slightly behind Sony sensors. Although Nikon sensors are made by Sony, Nikon uses a base iso of 64 on Z7 compared to 100 in Sony cameras. So you do get slightly better DR out of Nikon cameras if you are shooting at iso 64 though this advantage does go away as you raise your iso.
@@bharathghanta Thanks for the info. I read about that forced NR in R5 raw but then there were some other people who did the testing with different program(s) and said that it was not happening. I don't know but I still guess there is some of that happening.
I shoot wildlife photography so for me slight differences in sensor performance are not that critical. But current Sony sensors are quite old, even though tweaked during the years. So I'm interested in what kind of an improvement - and when - will the next gen bring...
Maybe it's only more speed with stacked design like in A9 series but with same DR than current A7 series. But maybe Sony will also move to 16-bit readout with 4:1 binning from a very high initial pixel count. This might be what Canon is doing now with their upcoming ~90Mp sensor. Or at least I hope it's just not the super high resolution...
At ISO 100 the R5 has the best dynamic range of all full frame cameras. Go check the largest sensor testing site Photons To Photos . Net. The R5 has most of its dynamic range in shadows, sacrificing highlight recovery so its best to shoot photos (and video) underexposed and recovering shadows.
@@bharathghanta Not in my testing. I have recovered underexposed shots from the R5 and A7RIV and the R5 wins...The A7RIV has more noise and also has colour shifts in shadows that the R5 doesn't. Sharpness isn't lost and in fact can look sharper surprisingly than the A7RIV when recovered, so any noise reduction is minor.
Just want to thank you for for making this informative videos.. i love watching it again and again evry episode.. its like watching netfilix series..👍
this was a really well done review. I have mine on order and am looking forward to it and converting my 5D Mark IV to a backup camera.
Well, I would appreciate an R6 review. Thank you for your work and sharing all this information
I’m saving for this camera can’t wait to mount it on the RF 28-70 !
Thank you very much for another excellent review.
Appreciate you compiling this. While i’d welcome trying some of these, i value weight and portability maybe more than others. So, when i owned Canon FF dslrs i really loved their ef 40mm f2.8. And having recently switching to Nikon when switching to mirrorless, i’m really looking forward to seeing some reviews of Nikon’s newly released 40mm f2.
Great review Chris! I think this will be my next camera when I finally get rid of the A7R2
Voice memo/rate button-THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!!
As always a balanced and fair review Chris - thank you 😎😎😎
Very impressive camera. I need something better for low-light, so I've looked towards Sony in the future, but even with the tiny pixels in this sensor, it would still be a huge upgrade with that stabilization. Very impressive.
Great review. Thanks Christopher
Can't wait till I buy One looks brilliant
Such an INCREDILE review
Excellent review, bring on more camera reviews.