Are Expensive Sunglasses Worth the Money

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @tayejus8413
    @tayejus8413 9 років тому +572

    The fish can tell the difference.
    If a fish swims up and sees you wearing cheap sunglasses he'll assume you're using cheap bait, he'll laugh and quickly swim away.
    If he sees you wearing expensive sunglasses he'll assume you're using a very nice tasty bait, he'll stop and pause for a bit while he admires you're sexy shades then go bite you're hook....Bam! Got em!

    • @99destroyer11
      @99destroyer11 9 років тому +1

      +Dilbert Doe your* your sexy shades nvm i'll leave now.

    • @عبداللهمنصور-ج3ط
      @عبداللهمنصور-ج3ط 9 років тому

      +Dilbert Doe هههههههه

    • @DJ-ij6lh
      @DJ-ij6lh 7 років тому +1

      Dilbert Doe LMAO

    • @eyelkenc9483
      @eyelkenc9483 7 років тому

      I found those professional fishing glasses, with 3 different lenses(3 in 1), Check on this site;
      bit.ly/2yNCjnT

    • @juicyboi2923
      @juicyboi2923 7 років тому +1

      I doesn't matter if they see his sunglasses if they see 3his hair they wil be out of there really fast

  • @alexandrosfrangoulis
    @alexandrosfrangoulis 8 років тому +77

    i wore cheap glasses for years.I bought a pair of costas cheap. i will never wear cheap glasses again. the difference is astonishing in my opinion.

  • @jasoncolon7000
    @jasoncolon7000 9 років тому +2

    I was in the same situation as you. A friend convinced me after 2 weeks to buy a pair of Maui Jims. I had a hard time thinking of spending that kind of money on 1 pair of sunglasses. I had the exact mindset as you. But I have to tell you that there is an incredible difference with the quality of the lenses and frame. As Joe mentioned your eyes do get very fatigued easier with cheaper lens sun glasses. I know this first hand when I used the cheap ones out fishing because I didn't want to get salt water on my Maui's. When I returned my eyes were blood shot red due to the cheaper lenses not protecting my eyes the way the Maui lenses protected them. Now I use nothing but a quality pair of lenses. Also as you stated the picture is better due to quality lenses. I promise you there is a difference.

    • @Blasthoff
      @Blasthoff 9 років тому

      Jason Colon Well guess what? You don't have to spend $260+ to get UV protection polarization. Yes, there will be some "actual" quality differences between el cheapo $5 and $260 glasses, but what about in between? By in between, I mean $20-$30 vs $260 which would narrow the gap considerably quality wise. What you are left with are marginal differences and about $230 of snob appeal. Of course anyone spending $260 will defend that action at length.

    • @jasoncolon7000
      @jasoncolon7000 9 років тому

      I have had PRK surgery and I am far from a snob. Been working my life since I was 14. As a person that could barely see 5 ft in front of me it's all about protection for my eyes. And like a mentioned prior that I noticed the difference when my eyes were red which means the sun got through those cheap lenses and was damaging my eyes. However with the Muai I tell you I haven't had that happen since. It's much more noticable to me probably because the layer that was taken from my eyes makes my eyes a little more sensitive however if it's happening to me I'm sure it's happening to anyone else on a different scale.

  • @DeepaManjax
    @DeepaManjax 8 років тому +1

    I read a lot of comments about eye protection; I do not wear any glasses and have protected them. I also vote for people who said expensive ones have quality. I would have liked them to be 50-60% cheaper though.

  • @joebleaux7039
    @joebleaux7039 10 років тому +149

    I am an Optician by trade and I will say this from my experience fishing over the last 25 years with sunglasses.
    *I have used the best and the worst.
    *There are different quality Polarized lenses on the market.
    The $5.00 Berkley's are not bad but there are subtle draw backs you can notice with extended use.
    Your eyes will most likely get fatigued faster without an Anti-reflection coating on the back side of the lens.
    *Visual acuity can be subjective.
    *Everyone will appreciate detail differently.
    *Lens color will play a part in how you see.
    -Amber is my favorite because it enhances colors more then gray and your vision driving in overcast or rain is sharper.
    -Gray is the best for those peak sunshine hours.
    -Green is great for tennis, golf, and early morning and late evening fishing.
    -Rose lenses tend to be a great middle ground between amber and gray.
    A good pair will have a quality Polarization with an AR coating. I can go into more detail if you all would like but it will be a wall of text.
    My summation would be, Polarized something is better then nothing. A quality polarization will bring out more detail then a cheap polarization. I keep some Berkley quality frames for myself and friends to use in a pinch but I love my Maui Jims the best Costa a very close second.

    • @dawnpatrol
      @dawnpatrol 10 років тому +5

      Thanks, this is important info. Its not about the money when it comes to protecting your eyes. Especially if you have had lasik or prk.

    • @zoffinger
      @zoffinger  10 років тому +15

      Thanks for your insight, Joe. You mentioned visual acuity being subjective; For instance, might wearing good sunglasses be like wearing good shoes? To a person with bad feet, good, quality shoes might make a world of difference, while to someone with healthy legs, back, feet, etc. they might be fine all day, wearing flip flops.

    • @joebleaux7039
      @joebleaux7039 10 років тому +8

      That is correct.
      Also, I have many people that are simply more perceptive then others which can be good and bad. I can have say two brothers come in together and one will jump for joy with how good they can see with them when we test them outside. His brother will shrug his shoulders and say what's the big deal about these glasses. Both of the brothers are not wrong in their impressions. On another note, if you have perfect vision verse close but not perfect the individual will have a different perspective as well. If say you have a very slight correction in your vision that is not corrected the difference in the sunglasses will not be very apparent as well.
      An analogy you could apply would be this, regular polarization and no treatments make you see in HD but Maui Jim or Costas give you Blu-ray. I can see the difference in Blu-ray verse HD but it really does not matter to me. Good sunglasses enhance the colors that you see regardless of tint color. I could also go into Bi-gradient tints as well. Bi-gradient tints make the sunglasses squint for you, this may sound crazy but this helps a lot as well.
      I am sort of like you Marty in the sense that I can function just fine with my Berkley's but I can tell a difference with my other glasses. For instance, when I am say tuna fishing and you have deep water and tons of surface glare the AR really makes it worth while to have the Costas on all day long. If you are standing verse sitting you may notice a bigger difference in what you can see as well.When I am on my kayak, I don't have the same perspective as standing on a boat.
      Oh damn, My two vices, fishing and glasses (shop talk to me). I know this does not clear up every question so please ask more if you would like to. I'd love to answer them. Its the least I could do considering all of your awesome content you give us! Keep up the great work Marty!
      Also, try the sunglasses again and look out on to a large body of water when it is sunny with no hat on. Try them as well while driving in different conditions. If its gloomy or rainy your amber lenses should give you more detailed vision verses the gray tinted lenses.
      If you don't mind me asking, when was your last eye exam? Men your age usually don't get checked often if ever till they notice something is off for at least two weeks or a month. : )

    • @joebleaux7039
      @joebleaux7039 10 років тому

      Edward Hall I sell Maui Jims for the normal retail prices because they are the current versions. The cheapest will be at Sam's or Costco because they sell all of the discontinued versions that still have the quality lenses of course.

    • @joebleaux7039
      @joebleaux7039 10 років тому

      Edward Hall local sporting goods stores will sell relatively cheap yet serviceable sun glasses. Just make sure your kids get the polarized forms at least. Save the Maui and Costas till they are around driving ages. I find more kids will appreciate them at that age usually.

  • @spawn11
    @spawn11 4 роки тому +1

    I only buy 10-15$ sunglasses. They work great and comfortable. Only draw back they break after a year. Not sure how long expensive ones will last.

  • @DrZiggyzoo1
    @DrZiggyzoo1 7 років тому +19

    Anyone will be "surprised" by how "similar" $5 glasses are compared to $250 glasses. The problem is, you're flipping them on and off in a period of one day. Go fishing a whole summer with good glasses like Costa Del Mar, Maui Jim, Oakley, etc. Then one day toward the end of the summer, put on the $5 Berkley. Then you'll be able to understand the difference in quality. I used to be the same cheapskate glasses guy until I got a pair of Oakley's for Christmas 5 years ago. Anytime I put on $5 glasses, they are complete pieces of crap. I'll never buy a cheap pair of glasses ever again. He even nailed it at the end around the 10:00 mark. Your vision is intangible, but the optical improvement is for sure noticeable if you wear them enough.

    • @evaldasbus9174
      @evaldasbus9174 4 роки тому

      you never buy Oakley again ,you will wait them for Christmas probably

    • @DrZiggyzoo1
      @DrZiggyzoo1 3 роки тому +1

      @@evaldasbus9174 Nah I've bought a pair of Costa and Maui's with prescription lenses now that I wear glasses. It makes any $250 pair seem cheap now. Prescription are over $500 unfortunately.

  • @edperry6199
    @edperry6199 3 роки тому +2

    I have an old pair of Calcutta sunglasses I've had for 18 years that cost $25.
    I see all the guides wearing fancy glasses and thought, I needed a pair. For the price, I expected to see through the water, through the fish and see what it had for dinner. NO DIFFERENCE in vision. NONE ! I returned the Costa's and got my money back. I figured it out. All the guides get guide discounts and brings the prices WAY down.
    So In all actuality, the expensive ones are just fashion statements. "I spent more money - I'm brilliant!"
    Guys that say they are better, are simply trying to justify their waste of money, Horse hockey !

  • @tovarasulsecretargeneral2822
    @tovarasulsecretargeneral2822 5 років тому +31

    i am not into fishing but for some reason i like to watch this guy talking

    • @Trompi2211
      @Trompi2211 4 роки тому

      Same. No idea about fishing. Just watched his boat build. He’s a lovely inspiring ‘oke. Such integrity too.

    • @SaltySeaCaptain
      @SaltySeaCaptain 4 роки тому

      Zoffinger is just a cool, down to earth kinda dude

  • @simodahed
    @simodahed 4 роки тому +4

    As a pilot and I also drive a lot, this is my verdict about high-end sunglasses: First, high quality sunglasses are not those well known designer trash, but those who are specialized in making sunglasses such as: Serengeti and Maui Jim which I consider top notch, so you pay for the quality (optics, frames, technology...) and not for the name of the brand. I have tried all high quality sunglasses: Maui Jim, Revo, Smith, Oakley, Ray-Ban you name it, and I find Serengeti to have the best quality in terms of optics and frames, not to mention their great various designs. Another thing to mention here: please do not buy cheap sunglasses, you'll feel instant dizziness and eye fatigue, and that's something the camera lens won't reveal. Also, polarization of Serengeti sunglasses is integrated within the lens, you are not going to experience any form of eye fatigue, however, cheap sunglasses use polarizing filters which is much cheaper and worse. Do yourself a favor and buy good pair of sunglasses and I recommend Serengeti, you won't just protect your eyes, but you'll have greater experience with the tints they offer.

    • @TheMrJurand2
      @TheMrJurand2 Рік тому

      Serengeti funboy 😆

    • @simodahed
      @simodahed Рік тому

      @@TheMrJurand2 I have now 5 pairs of Serengeti. Love them all

    • @didamnesia3575
      @didamnesia3575 Рік тому

      ​@@simodahedRandolph Engineering and Maui Jim are my personal favorites. Optical quality matters

    • @simodahed
      @simodahed Рік тому

      @@didamnesia3575 Try Serengeti

  • @SmokeRingsPipeDreams
    @SmokeRingsPipeDreams 8 років тому +42

    Good, honest review!

  • @tikitavi7120
    @tikitavi7120 9 років тому +6

    Spent 400 for a pair of Oakley Juliets that are worth more than I paid ten years ago. They are the finest sunglasses I have ever owned. Completely comfortable for all day wearing. I cannot get that with cheap sunglasses.

  • @MrTatts64
    @MrTatts64 10 років тому +12

    I have had years and years of cheap sunglasses. Never once damaging or losing them whilst fishing. It's always been once I have taken them home again hat the problems occur. Last year though, I did "invest" about £35 (about 2 and a bit times the money I usually pay) and they were more comfortable (I got a wide head) came with a nice case and cloths to keep them clean, but they also came with a lanyard. But the main reason I bought these ones.... They FLOAT! Fishing in continually cloudy water, the only real benefit I have had locally for polarised sunglasses is that it reduces the glare when casting into the sun. I have been able to fish in such circumstances for much longer without getting a head ache from the glare. But that is it. I don't wear them when generally out and about unless I am out looking for signs of fish activity early in the spring and summer. They just live atop the pc (so I know where they are and dont lose them in the home as usual), gathering dust..
    Great video and great review too, Marty. Not because of your verdict, but because of your honesty and willingness to stand against the crowd. Nice one!!

  • @SmokinBriar
    @SmokinBriar 9 років тому +33

    I think the cost of higher priced sunglasses are really unseen to the eye. I do believe that the lenses are a HUGE difference from the cheap to the expensive. It may not be something you can notice instantly, but the protection you get from the sun is what it's really all about. Think about this.....if Walmart sells those glasses for $5.00, Berkley most likely has about $2.00 into them! Now ask yourself....do you REALLY believe you are getting 100% UVA and UVB protection for that price? You only have one pair of eyes. Protect them my friend because as you know, Florida sun ain't no joke!

    • @10.11.9
      @10.11.9 8 років тому +2

      +Smokin' Briar Sound advice.

    • @joannrhamadan4246
      @joannrhamadan4246 8 років тому +4

      Plus them berkleys would shatter if hit with anything in the face .

    • @OverTheSevenSeas
      @OverTheSevenSeas 7 років тому +1

      I second that! Anybody unsure why you need UVA protection: look up macular degeneration, learn that it causes blindness, is untreatable and bad sunglasses make the progression of sight loss worse.. Good sunglasses on the other hand will protect your eye health. (I made another comment just above this one (commenting on the optician's comment) with a longer contribution.

    • @noblelies
      @noblelies 7 років тому +1

      You can get UV protection from a plastic bag. It's not really that expensive. Don't get scammed. Luxottica has you in their pocket. Don't know who they are? Use Google.

    • @dylanclay2741
      @dylanclay2741 3 роки тому

      @@noblelies yea but how fast does that UVA coating wear off on cheap glasses ? Any cheap glasses or had the coating would come off within a year

  • @jewf01
    @jewf01 8 років тому +8

    I run a few sunglass optic locations and their is a huge difference. First off those five dollar glasses are made with Triacetate. It is used for cheap sunglasses or clip-on sunglasses. It is cheaper price and lightest weight. You are just ruining your eyes with those garbage. Triacetate is not 100% safe for your eyes. It's a spray on film. Which translates if it rubs off, or scratches, the uv from the sun gets in. Second off, triacetate is not meant for your eyes to look through, hence the low price. Your just damaging your eyes. Thirdly, you have no anti reflective coating which reflect uv. Lastly, if they are not at least polycarbonate grade or better your optical clairty is very low and it's straining your eyes. And yes... all Costa's are polarized. Major difference in quality. Bro do not buy 5 dollar glasses unless you want your eyes to go to shit. You can get a descent pair of polarized glasses for everything, for about $50. Suncloud as an example and they too have a life time warrenty. My opinion is that while I agree to an extent about Costa, try Smith.

    • @XxBigDAWG22xX
      @XxBigDAWG22xX 8 років тому +5

      Nick Prosperie thank you for actually knowing the difference i thought everyone on here was gonna be ignorant on the different.

  • @SolarfallBaits
    @SolarfallBaits 10 років тому +5

    what i think you might be actually spending on more expensive sun glasses is probably build quality and more exotic coating methods that they put on the lenses. in some of them you can get prescription lenses too so that amps up the prize. In actual performance, i don't really see them being a whole lot better ether if you compare them to cheaper shades the differences to me are very small.

  • @jeremynorton3832
    @jeremynorton3832 10 років тому +13

    Dropping those in the water is like losing a GoPro. No Thanks! I have the $5.00 ones and they work just fine.
    Great Video!

  • @ylism
    @ylism 9 років тому +5

    I noticed the higher cost lenses has a more mirror like reflection, while the other pair did not, that may add more protection for the eyes on the water where sun glare is a problem, and more so for some people, I always prefered the copper amber lenses..

  • @adamwalsh2389
    @adamwalsh2389 5 років тому +3

    I use Edge Dakura Polarized Safety Glasses. $26 bucks on Amazon.
    Super comfortable, protects your eyes really well and they are sturdy.

  • @chipfilmstv
    @chipfilmstv 9 років тому +8

    Its fashion. Which is fine, as fashion has its place in culture, but desinger polarized glasses wont help somebody see fish better than most utility polarized glasses. The way to improve the ability to see fish, is by practicing looking for fish. The more you practice, the better ya get at it. Concentration and intensity also improve. You get 5 guys on a boat (with good vision), wearing a wide variety of sunglasses, and one guy of the 5 will consistently see the fish first. Over and over, Not always. But more so often than not. Its the guy that is used to focusing his attention on the water, and not drifting mentally, or getting distracted. Its not the glasses.

    • @zoffinger
      @zoffinger  9 років тому +4

      I thought about that yesterday as I tried to distinguish redfish from the random patches of grass on the flat and figured there must be people that are just better at picking up their slight movements giving them away, simply because they pay better attention. I agree with you Chip, 100%

    • @chipfilmstv
      @chipfilmstv 9 років тому +2

      zoffinger More so than target fish, vision intensity is even more crucial when it comes to select bait acquisition. Its all about Watertime. The more time you spend on the water, the stronger your vision intensity gets. All the good sunglasses work. Don't go for the Super cheep Polarized glasses because they may not provide the right UV protection. Your pupils dilate because of the tint, but they arent being protected from UV light. Make sure your shades have decent UV and the polarization is good to go.

  • @niro56
    @niro56 7 років тому +3

    Thank you for the honest review. Maybe not 5$ but some 15-20$ decently made ones with tough lenses and AR on top would be great.

  • @captainchippy8559
    @captainchippy8559 9 років тому +21

    the polarization film rubs right off on the berkleys after a couple of uses in saltwater watch..

    • @troyperales6873
      @troyperales6873 3 роки тому

      That's exactly what happened to my cheap sunglasses after only one time of being splashed.

    • @dylanclay2741
      @dylanclay2741 3 роки тому

      @@troyperales6873 I used to use berkley sunglasses along with Walmart Ozark trails and by the end of each summer the polarized costing would always burn off. I now have Costas with the 580 e glass and there's no comparison

  • @blinderb1032
    @blinderb1032 8 років тому +3

    Just picked up a $20 pair of XPS glasses from BPS. So far I like them far more than either pair of my Oakleys or my Maui Jim. Thanks for the video.

  • @blazerman61
    @blazerman61 8 років тому +18

    never skimp on eyewear or footwear!!...

    • @Roosyer
      @Roosyer 5 років тому

      or underwear!!

    • @User-es2yz
      @User-es2yz 4 роки тому

      Corvux IX especially not underwear

    • @elvisrickey4625
      @elvisrickey4625 4 роки тому

      That's what Grandma with the bunions and thick glasses used to say.

  • @bobmarks7919
    @bobmarks7919 5 років тому +4

    What I love about my costas is the comfort. And quality. Every time I put cheap glasses on they are shaped weired. And they are not rubberd like costas are in the right places

  • @bigbean1986
    @bigbean1986 10 років тому +15

    What I love about Costa sunglasses is I can get them in prescription.

    • @hatch7x
      @hatch7x 6 років тому

      As a long time, older guy, fly fisher who needs to change flies on the water the prescription option is a big deal. I fish for trout around the country and saltwater flats of the Caribbean as well as the inland bays of the Texas gulf; which is to say a variety of environments. I'm a believer that quality sunglasses provide superior optics with reduced eye fatigue ever since I bought my first pair of Smith Optics about 20 years ago. Also, I found glass provides better optics/clarity than polycarbonate. Now on my second pair of Costas I highly recommend them. Be advised of price though. The $260 cost as noted in the video is for non-prescription glasses. If, like me, you need prescription and progressive bifocals the cost is more like $800. That's a bit pricey, but not much more than regular glasses with a similar prescription with an anti-glare coating. It would be nice though if Costa took vision insurance.

    • @theguariscos4874
      @theguariscos4874 5 років тому +1

      600$ ouch

  • @thomaslowery3576
    @thomaslowery3576 3 роки тому +2

    Don’t know how I came across this video but I remember when I switched from cheapies to my first pair of costas and I never looked back because I could tell a huge difference in quality especially when you clean the cheap ones and the cheap polarization film comes off. I can dump a full of sand on my 580g lenses and rub them clean with a with a regular rag and no scratches. Do that with a cheap pair and see what happens. Also lense color on open water with costas makes a huge difference. It doesn’t make you see deeper in the water per say but what it does is takes the glare 100% away from the top of the water and give you a clearer field of view and also real polarized glasses keeps all the nasty uv rays out of your eyes.

  • @bgslade1
    @bgslade1 10 років тому +2

    For $5 you can carry a few spares in the boat/tackle box in case you loose them over the side or accidentally step or sit on them. $260 would ruin a good day of fishing

  • @hANNAbONE
    @hANNAbONE 5 років тому

    Costa & Maui Jim & Ray Bans are the "YETI" of sunglasses // ALL MARKETING. Get yourself some ShadyRays and call it good...plus, that terrific warranty. Thank you for the video, well done and honest. Good Job.!

  • @kylecarmody1352
    @kylecarmody1352 9 років тому +3

    love your honest review. I compared cheap flying fisherman glasses to overpriced Oakley years ago. been rocking the cheapo flying fisherman's ever since.

  • @mikezarate1727
    @mikezarate1727 6 років тому +1

    This was one of the best videos I’ve seen in a very long time. I’m subscribed to your channel now because it is easy to tell that you are humble, honest, and kind. Thank you.

  • @voicemint
    @voicemint 8 років тому +2

    I don't think $200+ for a pair of sunglasses is worthwhile. However, there are many great sunglasses to be had around $100. A $20 pair of sunglasses will certainly feel cheaper than ones costing $100, and they won't perform as well in terms of wear and tear, overall longevity. For folks who have a very tough time with not losing sunglasses, the $20 option is probably the way to go. For those who value and care for their sunglasses, the more expensive pair is definitely worthwhile. Because it's not just about UV400 protection, but about optical correctness. I have one pair of sunglasses made by Nikon that I've owned since 1996. 20 years. And aside from a few minor nicks to the lenses, they're in terrific shape (I plan on keeping them another 20 years).

  • @RoguePhysicist
    @RoguePhysicist 9 років тому

    Tip: don't use your shirt to wipe the lenses. $260 glasses should have come with a microfiber cleaning cloth. Always use that. Using your shirt will put very fine scratches on the surface of the lens. Over time it will become noticeable.

  • @perlaepifaniatorreja6177
    @perlaepifaniatorreja6177 8 років тому +1

    Honest review...for me the best sun glasses in my experience are polaroid lenses...fancy frame or not...it is lense that matters for 100% care & protection of your eyes.

  • @Charsept
    @Charsept 10 років тому +8

    $15 sunglasses gives you a little more options. I'd call that a good middle ground.

  • @cjada82
    @cjada82 9 років тому +1

    I use the Rebel, blue lense and white frame sunglasses that you can find next to those berkley shades and they work well. I've had my fair share of designer shades. Considering wear and tear in sunglasses, I'd rather use a handful of the Berkley, Rebel, and Yum sunglasses.

  • @sliceheartshot4341
    @sliceheartshot4341 9 років тому +13

    i'm right there with ya man! most ppl who spend that kinda money on glasses will usually sit there and bash the cheap ones because their afraid to look stupid.thanks for the honest review!

    • @treydrier3169
      @treydrier3169 9 років тому +1

      SLICE HEARTSHOT
      If you feel good with what you wear whether it be nice apparel, shoes or sunglasses then more power to ya. But to say that someone who spent a couple hundred dollars on quality shades or shoes or whatever doesn't want to look stupid....that's really quite contrary to reality.

    • @holdem5180
      @holdem5180 9 років тому

      +SLICE HEARTSHOT wrong pal , i always got the 5 dollar ones and they were fine, till i bought some oakley half jackets for 110.00 most i ever paid , kept them mint for 7 yrs, then sold em for 65 and the kid loved em.... now im looking for new flak jackets 2.0 and they are def worth it........

    • @brettsreeftank3079
      @brettsreeftank3079 7 років тому

      holdem5180 mine broke after a year so I fixed them and less then a year later they completely fell apart. Getting a pair of costas soon

  • @youtang
    @youtang 8 років тому +2

    Thank you for a good hinest review. I just stumbled apon this video. It looked hard for you towards the end there. I am a young father first and a fisherman second. I am on a budget and I appreciate the honesty in this video. I would like you to know that you earned a new subscriber. Thank you for saving me a bunch of money.

  • @GreatWhite7
    @GreatWhite7 9 років тому

    I know of one brand that is worth the money (Mako in Australia). I bought a pair and after 9 years they were scratched, but still usable. I bought a pair of Raybans next (as I was overseas), and got 6 months out of them. I used to only get 6 months out of my Oakleys also. My next pair of Makos were stolen after 3 years, and the next pair, I ran over after 3 years.

  • @jojo-dn7qb
    @jojo-dn7qb 5 років тому +1

    if i could wear cheap shades i would. i wear prescription shades down here in florida. i have to pay extra but having health care benefits helps with the overall cost.

  • @arhlenitchon4866
    @arhlenitchon4866 7 років тому +1

    i got two polarizref the one cheap and more expensive. the cheap one give me hallunication vision when you see reflective light. the more expensive its clear

  • @sinlokemp
    @sinlokemp 9 років тому +10

    You sure got disappointed half way through the video. But this video has been an eye opener. Actually all the fancy (Ray Ben, Oakley, Versace, Polo & 100 other more brands) sun glasses are own by one company 'Luxottica' in Italy. Even the sunglass retails and eye care clinics. They monopolise the entire world sunglass business. Yes I agree the fancy glasses are all over priced! I rather buy a cheaper yet decent glasses over the big brands!

    • @Guerrilla-Green
      @Guerrilla-Green 9 років тому +7

      “People buy over-priced brands that they think they like, at prices they don't like, to impress shitty people that they don't like."

    • @maverickdallas1004
      @maverickdallas1004 7 років тому

      Check out Liberty Sport, the maker of Rec-Specs. All of their products are extremely durable, safety grade and recognized the world over. They are modestly priced and most can also be fitted with prescription lenses.

    • @TheWallsocket
      @TheWallsocket 6 років тому +1

      Its funny you mention that because the glasses he tested in this video are Costa's, one of the few big brands NOT owned by Luxottica.

    • @Daddy53751
      @Daddy53751 6 років тому

      And to add insult to injury, I just got a new pair of real Ray-Ban sunglasses MADE IN CHINA! They are making them in China now.

    • @jorgevelez442
      @jorgevelez442 6 років тому

      Is there some glasses for about 50 $ whith good cuality?

  • @MichaelHadac
    @MichaelHadac 6 років тому

    I think the best solution is to Download a "RayBan" polarized picture to your phone. Keep it there when you want to purchase good polarized glasses. It will show you everything, when you check the glasses you want to purchase! Just Rotate them above the "RayBan" image. Then decide which are better for you.. it's a small file but it works great!

  • @tigerbalm666
    @tigerbalm666 8 років тому +13

    80% status/profit/marketing costs, 10% higher quality and design, 10% hype...

  • @scrundy541
    @scrundy541 6 років тому +1

    Yeah you're right. But... Investing in your passion is important. I think you need to be buying top quality gear if you can. It also adds to confidence on the water which may be superstition, it still feels better. Even if everything looks the same.

  • @unionse7en
    @unionse7en 8 років тому +1

    Berkeley has polarized amber versions too, i've been using them for years, best value in glasses ever, same 5 bux, i always go for polarized amber with the least amount of darkening.

  • @BradXP
    @BradXP 10 років тому +1

    I personally love costas warranty. Also if you buy a old pair of costas for really cheap and call them for a repair. You can get any pair of your choice. I think the fee was only like 70$

  • @staxx979
    @staxx979 10 років тому +1

    Dropped mine cracked the glass lens sent them in and they charged me $90 buck so yeah 260+90= 👎 now they are cracked again and sitting in my closet. Thanks for your honest opinion.

  • @Joe_1971
    @Joe_1971 8 років тому +36

    I know on me cheap glasses gives me a headache, where as quality glasses don’t.

    • @bradleedavis6276
      @bradleedavis6276 8 років тому +3

      same here

    • @firewire8912
      @firewire8912 8 років тому +3

      +Bradlee davis very true. Oakleys i love

    • @illduitmyself
      @illduitmyself 8 років тому +5

      depends on the UV capability and comfort on the bridge of your nose

    • @O3ODORSOLUTIONS
      @O3ODORSOLUTIONS 6 років тому

      same here i can't wear cheap glasses they give me headaches

    • @MuahMan
      @MuahMan 3 роки тому

      @@firewire8912 Oakley got bought by Luxotica and are made in China now. They are no different than the $5 Berkley's. Costa with the 580 glass are the real deal.

  • @Midiman741
    @Midiman741 9 років тому

    I found a nice happy medium...Polaroid lenses, about $100...totally confortable, great polarization, and the amber tint.

  • @pcdubya
    @pcdubya 5 років тому +2

    Spied a little thing and I followed her all night
    In a funky fine Levis and her sweater's kind of tight
    She had a west coast strut that was as sweet as molasses
    But what really knocked me out was her cheap sunglasses

  • @KayakChris
    @KayakChris 10 років тому

    I actually use a pair of those Berkley glasses but with amber lenses. I think the cable I use to keep them around my neck cost me close to 3X what the glasses cost! lol I've wondered myself if there was a significant difference between expensive glasses and the cheapies. Thanks for the review.

  • @chillyann69
    @chillyann69 9 років тому +2

    my hubbie has caught tons of fish with the 5$ and 15$ pair of sunglasses sight fishing in the gulf and bay....never had an expensive pair yet, cant imagine how much better we would do.

  • @robertovalenzuela832
    @robertovalenzuela832 7 років тому

    One of the main reasons for price dif. is the process of polarization,there 3 types with the best for your vision protection and less eye fatigue obviously being more expensive,which also is more expensive to do.

  • @myloft5633
    @myloft5633 9 років тому

    I owned several brands as most people.
    If it can help some the best bang for the money I experienced is Serengeti.
    And one of the best filtering you can ever get.
    Espcially if you are a driver or pilot with the "driver gradient".
    Plus they're durable.
    I had some WileyX for more "intense" activity: they're ok but they didn't last me more than 5 years before one of the legs broke off from the frame (poor molding quality, the glasses never took a beating) whereas my Sergenti are still here.
    Sergenti doesn't have the most comforable frames but they're improving.
    Peace.

  • @WisconsinEric
    @WisconsinEric 10 років тому

    I have a couple pair of expensive Maui Jim triple polarized fishing glasses, and I noticed a huge difference in clear water vs cheapo fishing glasses. In stained water that is more common here in Wisconsin, there is not as much difference between them in terms of visibility into the water.

  • @falquot3
    @falquot3 10 років тому +1

    I completely agree with you no need too spend lots of money on sun glasses when you can buy much cheaper ones and have much more money to spend on actual fishing equipment. I would only spend up to a maximum of $40 for sun glasses just for that little extra quality so they don't break as easy, great video man and G'day from one of your Australian Fans! I wish you could experience some of our fishing here I think you would love it!

  • @valentinchiriac9117
    @valentinchiriac9117 4 роки тому

    you can verify easy polarization. You are in an intersection and if you can see the guy at the wheel opposed to you, it means the remove the glare, they are polarized. otherwise, if you can't see through the shining windshield, they are not polarized. If you can look directly into the sun for 3 seconds, they are polarized and good quality.

  • @youknee1
    @youknee1 10 років тому +13

    i have a pair of Costas and a pair of cheapo glasses also. The difference I notice is in the eye fatigue, my eyes seem to get tired after all day fishing with the cheapo glasses and with the Costas they don't. but maybe its in my head LOL!

    • @dawnpatrol
      @dawnpatrol 10 років тому +3

      Yep you are on the money. I have too noticed this.

    • @joebleaux7039
      @joebleaux7039 10 років тому +5

      The Better lenses include and Anti-Reflection coating on the back of the lens. All Maui Jim's and Costa's have the AR coating.

  • @lawrenceegilsson852
    @lawrenceegilsson852 4 роки тому

    I can't say about Costa's, but I always wore cheap shades. Then I put on a pair of Maui Jim's Peahi's and fell in love.
    The clarity and how they felt on my face was AMAZING! I wore them for six years before I broke them. Two years later after countless twenty - fifty dollar shades I bought another pair of Peahi,s. I even tried other pricey brands, however, non of them had the same impression on me. I found the same pair of Peahi's from Maui Jim, put them on and completely felt the same eight years earlier.
    If you aren't going to constantly brake, loose or have someone steal them, I will spend the money on good shades everytime.

  • @TangoUniform300
    @TangoUniform300 10 років тому +1

    I will keep my Oakley Polarized glasses. I have had them for 15 years. So the difference is not only in the lens, but the frames as well. I do however keep two pair of cheaper glasses for guests.

    • @chipfilmstv
      @chipfilmstv 9 років тому +2

      Yeah if you keep your stuff nice. Sweet designer shades are luxury.

    • @salsun7437
      @salsun7437 9 років тому +2

      I have had my $3 pair of sunglasses I got at a flea market 25 years ago. They must be high quality if I've had them that long.

  • @ZX6RIDER541
    @ZX6RIDER541 5 років тому +1

    I agree I always wear cheap glasses for my regular construction job but I wouldn't trade them for my Oaklys I can tell the difference when I wear them

  • @ItachiUchiha-ur1br
    @ItachiUchiha-ur1br 5 років тому +5

    The Maui Jim Sea House Aviator shades are Amazing! Especially in Blue Hawaii.

  • @schuylercollier
    @schuylercollier 8 років тому

    Marty. Amen. Just saw this video. I have had a pair of Tuna Alley CDM's replaced twice! The rubber falls off the bottom. The lifetime warranty has a few catches as well. They don't replace for free. Picked up a pair of XPS glasses at Bass Pro for $24. Love them. Don't believe the hype. Live on the edge.

  • @workingclasswoodsman
    @workingclasswoodsman 9 років тому +2

    This is a great topic. I have worn every pair of sunglasses in my life and the ONLY difference I notice is that cheaper sunglasses seem great out of the box but tend to lose quality very soon. You also have to be careful of counterfeit glasses. A real pair of Oakley's will give you years of quality service. Oakley, like some other expensive company's take longer to make and are labor and material related as well and cost reflects that. I like Native myself and they retail for around 150.00. My biggest fear of expensive glasses is losing them. Lot's of good info here..

    • @salsun7437
      @salsun7437 9 років тому +1

      Did you wear my sunglasses?

  • @ethanmcdowell9677
    @ethanmcdowell9677 5 років тому

    I have a pair of Costa del Mar Fathoms and a pair of Maui Jim Big Wave polarized. Tried several different pairs before dropping the cash for the spendy ones and I'll never go back. My Costas have been in warranty repair three times for lens replacement and I've paid less that $20 each time. The Jims are my backups.

  • @richsam287
    @richsam287 5 років тому

    I purchased one pair of shades over 100 dollars and felt like a fish biting a hook. I felt taken. I ALWAYS purchase 20-30 dollar range and are always happy.

  • @billdill9592
    @billdill9592 9 років тому +6

    I love my costas and will never go on the water with out them, they are the BEST.

  • @aHydrasa
    @aHydrasa 9 років тому

    For me, the difference is in comfort. I bought a $5 pair of polarized glasses when I started fishing and got massive headaches from the glasses when wearing them for hours. It was the way they sat on my ears. From that, I went out and bought a $150 pair of polarized Oakley Flak Jackets and have had them for 5 years without any issues. I put them on my face and forget they are there because they are so comfortable. In a pinch I'd definitely use the cheap ones but a high-end pair is well worth the money if you're going to wear them every day.

  • @birdsnake420
    @birdsnake420 7 років тому +2

    Thanks for that review, don't really have 150-250 to spend on glasses. Recently heard about polarized sunglasses so I'll be going to Walmart or Sportsmans to look for some cheapies.

  • @trickykid73
    @trickykid73 9 років тому +1

    What about eye strain ? I bought a cheap pair , wearing them for just 5 hours gave me a headache . Not cool . Went for broke and bought a very expensive pair of Oakley ( i suffer with very light sensertive eyes ) . They are amazing , i wont go back to cheap lenses ever . But this is only my opinion .
    .

  • @stuartfill6601
    @stuartfill6601 5 років тому +1

    I've just bought a pair of Oakley c-wire blue Ice iridium polarised sunglasses for 95p from a charity shop. You can get high quality for peanuts if you look hard enough.
    Great videos by the way.

  • @joeblow3219
    @joeblow3219 9 років тому

    They are completely worth it to me. I have 580G green mirror, and just ordered a pair with 580G blue mirror. I also have SpiderWire glasses from walmart. My Costa's fit my head much more comfortable... I can wear them all day with out noticing I have them on. The lens quality isn't even a comparison.. My Costa lens are way better than my Spiderwires...

  • @bobthbldr3
    @bobthbldr3 5 років тому

    I used to fish quite a bit and started out wearing the cheap polarized glasses and then invested in a good pair. I would suggest wearing the cheap ones all day in bright sun and then another day wear the better ones. I could tell the difference in clarity and comfort. Polarized glasses are dimensional, the expensive ones are lined up horizontal where the cheap ones tend to be a little off. Tilt your head sideways and the polarization goes away. I think the better glasses are way overpriced but they do seem to be a little better.

  • @roadrunner8428
    @roadrunner8428 6 років тому

    Over the past 30 years I went from $10.00 to $30.00 sunglasses. I then purchased Ray Ban Aviators and threw out all of the cheap glasses. I then learned why I was getting headaches and some blurriness after wearing the cheap ones for an extended period of time. I then found the Oakleys and Costas. I will never purchase cheap sunglasses again, my eyes are so relaxed with these newer pieces and you can also replace the lenses when they have worn out, as I usually do once a year. Your eyes are not replaceable, you get what you pay for. Take care of your eyes.

  • @jaredrandall3251
    @jaredrandall3251 7 років тому

    I have a pair of Oakley Radars that of course are polarized, but just bought a new pair of Costa Blokes with the green mirror. Just the comparison of what you can actually see in the water makes a huge difference. The oakleys have really disappointed me with the quality. I think if you specifically buy the Costas for fishing (green mirror) are much better than the cheap ones. The clarity is also much better and not nearly as much distortion

  • @johnstrand2247
    @johnstrand2247 6 років тому

    I can sure tell a difference and after a few months, you will find that blue coating to be coming right off the cheapies. Also look at fine detail like leaves changing in color and then there is a huge difference with the Costas.

  • @thomasnapp3680
    @thomasnapp3680 6 років тому

    So I'm a truck driver and my eyes started to have problems when I would first wake up so I went to Walmart and seen the eye doctor and after a few minutes they recommend a better version so I spent $50 the most I've ever spent on sunglasses and 2 months later my eyes were perfect again so I spent the money on Costa and have had no eye trouble at all in the last 2 years

  • @AmericanPrideHB
    @AmericanPrideHB 7 років тому

    Get Bomber Eyewear. They float, very durable and low cost.

  • @jeramiebentley4054
    @jeramiebentley4054 7 років тому

    one thing i have noticed in less expensive sun glasses the can give you a head ache if the lenses are not shaped right. Like motion sickness or something.

  • @MW3gamebattlesHD
    @MW3gamebattlesHD 10 років тому +1

    I agree with you on the sunglasses but why don't you feel the same way about the powerpole?

  • @grizzlycountry1030
    @grizzlycountry1030 7 років тому

    Lost my oakley sunglasses. Bought a cheap pair. Noticed a huge difference driving home towards the sunrise after being on duty all night. Still had to put my visor down with the cheap pair.

  • @pir842
    @pir842 8 років тому

    Unfortunately those of us who need prescription glasses have to spend a bit more on sunglasses. Transition lenses are the way to go. 2 in 1.

  • @saltire546
    @saltire546 6 років тому

    I have tried out loads of my fishing pals glasses and the medium priced glasses seem to be the best buy regarding build quality and seeing fish underwater and removing the glare.

  • @edgit69
    @edgit69 10 років тому

    What's bad for me is I have a astigmatism in my eyes requiring perscription lenses for distance and reading and prescription polorized glasses and frames the cost is ridiculous. Ive tried contacts to use regular sunglasses but the contacts irritate my eyes. Wish I was fortunate enough to have good vision.

  • @revive5
    @revive5 2 роки тому

    The best way tto find their value is to check them with a UV meter see which one really have the lowest or outright blocking UV A/B which is the only thing that matter.

  • @oakland002
    @oakland002 9 років тому

    I use the cheap one all the time..
    It's just like my reels n rod setup , under $30 , my brothers stuffs are over $1k, yet we catch just as much fish , sometime they catch more , other times I end up catching more ..
    It's just a status thing

  • @TheAmick218
    @TheAmick218 8 років тому +26

    paid 267 after tax for my Costas. No regrets. Amazing glasses.

    • @naturesfinest4218
      @naturesfinest4218 8 років тому

      you might not be an angler on a budget eh

    • @jewf01
      @jewf01 8 років тому

      If you are on a budget try Suncloud. They are all UV 400, polycarbonate lenses. Not that cheap garbage for $5. They will run you around $50 but they too have a lifetime warrenty.

    • @naturesfinest4218
      @naturesfinest4218 8 років тому +3

      It's only garbage because you see yourself above them. If they're $5 and work well, are they really garbage? I thought the purpose of sunnies is how they work.

    • @jewf01
      @jewf01 8 років тому +6

      No it's garbage because the material of the lens (low grade plastic) is bad for your eyes. Your better off wearing nothing. If you can buy a polarized Polycarbonate for $5 then it's worth it but you can not. The cheapest pair at Walmart that was a poly was $29 and it was a spray on film coating. It's about the overall protection.

    • @naturesfinest4218
      @naturesfinest4218 8 років тому +2

      I'm just playing devil's advocate lol, I wear Oakleys and Costas... but growing up less than fortunate, I don't think cheap things are bad if the functionality is there.. what about low grade plastic lenses in bad for your eyes?

  • @thegreatadventures2024
    @thegreatadventures2024 6 років тому

    I’ve noticed the eye fatigue drops with the more expensive of Costa’s and a little more clear quality as well.

  • @mrchallenger7616
    @mrchallenger7616 8 років тому +1

    Oakley sunglasses are the best in my opinion ! High quality optics and frames, they will last alot longer ! Sunfactor 4 out of 5 is not the kind of protection you will find in cheap sunglasses ! I have the Oakley T-Wire from 1998 and they are still going strong ! I use them every summer and they are not scratched up yet ! Absolutely awesome !

  • @bronzemouthwarrior4049
    @bronzemouthwarrior4049 4 роки тому

    I think that there is probably not much of an initial difference when you’re looking through both and comparing the view. I have found the difference is in all day use. Wearing glasses for 8-10 hours is different than peeking through them for a minute or two. Higher end glasses make a big difference. A big difference in how my eyes feel at the end of the day.

  • @CaptianConstruction
    @CaptianConstruction 9 років тому +1

    I don't see the Costas and similar glasses as anything more than a status symbol. I do like my $160 WileyX glasses though, and here's why; WileyX glasses are next to indestructible. I have slung rocks from my weedeater and hit my lenses, and the rock just bounces off. Don't try that with those Costas unless you want an eye full of glass! They are OSHA approved safety glasses. Also the ones I got(model: AirRaid) come with a removable foam gasket that basically turns them into goggles; keeps dirt and debris out, and totally blocks out glare so I can see into the water. These are the same type of glasses worn by a lot of our special forces guys so that should say something!!! Check'em out and I think you will 'see' a BIG difference! Tight lines buddy

  • @akidsguideouside
    @akidsguideouside 10 років тому

    those $5 sunglasses rock! they stood up to almost a year of bowfishing and are still going when in 3 days in the beginning of the year i broke 3 more expensive pairs and for the price of one of the expensive pairs i bought a BUNCH of spares so I have some for my buddies to use

  • @drdoutdoors1603
    @drdoutdoors1603 5 років тому

    I just got my costa saltbreaks in today with the green lenses and within 10 minutes I can tell that they are better quality polarized lenses than the oakley's that i've used for the past ten years. I love oakley's but the polarization and clarity of these glasses are much better in my opinion. I still love oakley's but for fishing, costa will be my choice for now on. I've owned the cheap Walmart glasses, they work but not as good nor do they last as long. The lense protection will begin to peel in no time but you can go pick up another pair for 10 bucks. I'm just blown away at the clarity of the Costa's!

  • @charlesyoung9972
    @charlesyoung9972 10 років тому

    I got a a couple of Costas, I like the frame and the rubber gripping material on them. here in South Texas it gets humid during the dog days of Summer and that gripping material really hold. Plus the glass cuts down on the scratching. great vid

  • @pcdubya
    @pcdubya 5 років тому

    There are people driving around with 2 foot wide " Costa " or " Yeti " stickers on their back windows? Never understood that loyalty myself but you have to hand it to the manufacturers for building a brand they are able to sell for 10 times more for being a little better. I have some glass lens Smith's I paid about 130.00 for.

  • @honestabe4760
    @honestabe4760 6 років тому

    You seem honest and intelligent I want a quality pair of sunglasses just don't want Oakley or to have that confused look you have

  • @mikel7732
    @mikel7732 7 років тому

    Oakley polarized, big difference.

  • @goodwater2020
    @goodwater2020 9 років тому +1

    Thanks for reveiw. I've used warranty but had to pay to get them looked at and then pay 50 n some to replace. Next pair wore out n half time. They wanted 80 plus to fix. Thats not warranty stated at all. Nose peice deteroiated on both glasses n left sticky sludge on my nose. Costa Hype! Debatting on trying Salt Life with Zeiss lense. Poor boy trying to protect his eyes.

  • @charlespinson6693
    @charlespinson6693 5 років тому

    First, thank for this comparison post. Now onto the subject of this post. I have used less expensive angler shades and have had great results. The problem becomes extreme eye fatigue after wearing the cheaper/less expensive glasses. I found that my eyes were forced to work much harder to focus creating this eye fatigue! (My Opinion Only)...