Excellent channel. You both should be so proud of what you have created and the leadership you have shown in trying to deliver the 4th Estate in the manner it was intended. Unherd's work during C19 was how media should have behaved .I have listened to Rfk Jr in well over a dozen long form interviews. His explanation of issues such as vaccines is sensible when in long form. He has a PHD in corporate capture ,which makes him extremely threatening to the entrenched bureaucracy/special interest groups and the doner class, hence why he is smeared so much . He is an easy target to chop up and smear on soundbites out of context. We are at a point now where I think the broader society realises that we have drifted into a form of "Crony Capitalism " and "Special interests Democracy . A reset is necessary before the notion of Socialism takes hold on the disaffected middle class and youth. This clearly cannot be achieved without fresh outsiders such as Rfk Jr .
excellent text, many thanks & greetings from Berlin, my wife and I watched UnHerd from Germany nearly the whole US ELECTION night and it was a gas. Regards.
@@lizgilbert9129 , it’s just a political buzzword that gets used a lot. It basically just means aggressive or intense on a particular matter. I’ve always assumed it comes from how a hawk studies and attacks prey.
Outsiders hellbent on reforming an entrenched bureaucracy will need to surround themselves with experienced, low-profile insiders who agree with reformist goals. That can happen, but it is not guaranteed. And I don't see Trump tolerating the existence of anyone who outshines him. Musk's days asTrump's BBF are numbered.
They all share one common trait: they are all the top reality tv stars. There was always the danger that when we fell in love with reality tv, it would become reality.
Vance will be President of the Senate. If He can't get majorities next year, he'd settle for a tie. Elon and Vivek have his back. THEY ARE NOT BACK STABBERS, THANK GgD.
That’s false. Most antiwar people, left and right, are all either hostile, or indifferent, to the Israel-Palestine conflict, or they condemn what you (erroneously) call “Israel's genocide.”
Americans are just tired of all the noise coming from Israel, they hope Trump will end it even if it means fast-tracking Israel's annexation of Gaza. They don't really view that as a war, they believe Israel is fighting terrorist and quickest way to end it is help Israel annihilate them. So in a sense they are antiwar because they want the conflict to be ended once and for all. Allowing Gaza exist would mean that wars will continue to erupt in the future. My bet is that by the end of Trump's second term Palestinian idea will be dead, no one will ever even consider two state solution that only democrats were talking about anyway.
There are some interesting ways that Trump and RFK Jr. connect. For instance, Trump doesn't like offshore windmills, and RFK Jr. said they should be removed because they are whale killers. RFK Jr. accuses the Democrats of ignoring toxic chemicals in favor of a climate agenda.
Your argument that more establishment people have more ability to tear down an establishment is ludicrous do you make the argument that all DEI positions should be old white men because they have the most experience with old white men and would be best suited to tear down old white men?
Trump's goal is about the future. The majority of his picks are young, successful, and can communicate in front of the camera. These are the key ingredients to winning an election. IMO we are not only good for the next four years, but good for the next 12 years. That is a very deep bench. He can't afford another repeat of the state going after him after he leaves office.
Hawkish/dovish is the dichotomy used to describe a politician's approach to foreign policy. A hawk is someone who is more keen to intervene in foreign affairs, militarily if need be, a dove is someone who is very hesitant to do so.
The term hackish is often associated with an unjustified drive for violence, and I believe it deserves reconsideration. You should consider creating a special feature on China's hackish maneuvers in Latin America and their connection to the migrant crisis, particularly in the case of Venezuela. By the way, I recall the not so great piece on Venezuela you ran a few months ago.
Stop trying to start that stupid stuff. No one can run as VP when they have already been president for 2 terms. This is silly. Are you a Democrat or just an undercover CIA trying to start stuff?
** Hegseth Experience: Actually, it is not unusual for secretary, defense to have his amount of experience-or even less. Case in points: during the Bush administration secretary, defense, Donald Rumsfeld who had even less experience.
Women in journalism and public life - the only thing that matters is who slept with whom. What has any of this got do with public policy and running a government ?
@@kevinmcfarlane2752 You used the words "successful or effective" - this is notable, because these words do not suggest the politician in question actually did anything good. For example, Stalin was certainly both successful and effective, but Russia would almost certainly have been better off if Stalin had been ineffectual. There are other measures of fulfilling public duties, beyond effectiveness. It is good for society, if a morally upstanding politician is effective. If, however, the politican is not morally upstanding - then from the perspective of society, the less effective they are, the better.
Emily doesn’t understand what redundancy means. It is not efficiency. Redundancy in organizational terms is a good thing- if person A or system A is out, then person B or system B can fill in. Having only one person in the government that can fulfill a task is not efficient. If a two people have different roles day to day but can fill in for each other if needed, that is redundancy. So you can fire 3 people and train 2 people to do those 3 people’s jobs. That’s more redundancy AND more efficiency.
UnHerd is not intended to be a MAGA talking shop. I do watch and enjoy MAGA and other conservative content, but I also like to consume content somewhat like this, for a different perspective.
After watching this it is hard to not have a much more pessimistic view. RFK who I think can clean up (because he has the knowledge about the departments he will be overseeing, and has long has plans on how to do it), I don't have so much doubt about; and I think he will stay in his lane on the environmental issues because he is smart enough to pick his battles. Other than that, I don't see much of the ... cleaning up of 3 letter agencies, stopping wars and foreign meddling, return of privacy and freedom and the fight to remove censorship, stopping environmentalism lies and propaganda machinery and indoctrination of our children and young, stopping the revolving doors mechanisms and general systemic corruption, making life hard for woke idiocy (in all its forms). Where is all of that in this ? Is it going to be like last time .. lotsa hot air, but not able to change anything about the big machine after all ?
Everyone except Matt Gaetz would do fine as long as the Senate and House don’t try to block them. Pete definitely could do the job, if you’ve read his books I don’t think he’s naive at all about the Bureaucracy
Wow This Gaetz person sounds hands-down awful, even for having the imprisoned self-confessed liar Joel Greenberg as his “best” friend, no matter if “ex”. The quality of these two people (who got elected or appointed) is beyond bad - both are without conscience.
Well, at least Gaetz is out of the picture. There goes one unqualified moron. The question is which is the next unqualified and inexperienced moron he'll choose now. Isn't Dr. Phil available?
So I guess you’re ok with Biden, Harris and their band of “qualified professionals” who have got us to the brink of nuclear war with Russia. I hope you’re a Brit and not an American. The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result.
You're right, the moment someone gets one thing wrong we should forever stop listening to what they have to say on every subject. We should only listen to people who have never gotten anything wrong.
Tulsi Gabbard went straight to Trump Tower in 2016 to as Trump for the same cabinet-level positions she's looking for now, Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense. She might've endorsed Sanders but when she did so she called him "a strong leader", in keeping with her pro-authoritarian views. Gabbard is an expert in psychological warfare and she tends to use her expertise to lobby against the US on almost every issue; she's done a lot to hide her radical religious views and she's definitely not America First.
@herrrobert5340 She was brought up in the Science of Identity Foundation, led by Chris Butler, a counterculture communist anti-war activist that broke with the Hare Krishna movement and founded his own religion. Her father is one of the most anti-gay politicians and Tulsi's hostile attitudes towards Islam are evident in her voting record and support for the War on Terror. Her aunt, recently murdered by a close friend, believes that Tulsi's views seem motivated by Butler's extremism: “Once again I find my niece’s apparent penchant for parroting extremist toadies such as Tucker Carlson and vile ‘strongmen’ such as Vladimir Putin, to be problematic and deeply troubling,” Sinavaiana Gabbard, a retired professor of English at the University of Hawaii, told The Independent. “It gives me no pleasure to note that Tulsi’s single governing principle seems to be expedience, which is in effect no principle at all.” Tulsi's political career has led her to conceal the most controversial aspects of her religion, saying that she is a practicing Hindu and that she regrets her support for homosexual conversion therapy. However, given the pattern she's following, she seems to behave like most politicians, especially religiously motivated politicians, that conceal their true beliefs in exchange for more power and authority.
@@vesterwolf Yeah I dunno about being emotionally manipulated by an opportunistic cult leader as a child as being a good thing. Usually a yogi is a Sadguru type, not someone that supports the War on Terror. It's the combination of things that sets off alarm bells, but yeah I guess a lot of people are fooled by Christian apologists too.
Fantastic job by, Emily. She's a huge asset to Unherd.
Emily is the only honest talented reporter of this generation , in my eyes she is the face of legacy media.
Honestly, if you think it the old media probably has been lying for decades because we didn't have the free info we have now.
lmao
💯
Kind of an insult.
I admire her immensely as well; but she's not alone.
I like Emily, smart and genuine
Gaetz just withdrew
Gud
Excellent channel. You both should be so proud of what you have created and the leadership you have shown in trying to deliver the 4th Estate in the manner it was intended.
Unherd's work during C19 was how media should have behaved .I have listened to Rfk Jr in well over a dozen long form interviews. His explanation of issues such as vaccines is sensible when in long form. He has a PHD in corporate capture ,which makes him extremely threatening to the entrenched bureaucracy/special interest groups and the doner class, hence why he is smeared so much . He is an easy target to chop up and smear on soundbites out of context. We are at a point now where I think the broader society realises that we have drifted into a form of "Crony Capitalism " and "Special interests Democracy .
A reset is necessary before the notion of Socialism takes hold on the disaffected middle class and youth. This clearly cannot be achieved without fresh outsiders such as Rfk Jr .
excellent text, many thanks & greetings from Berlin, my wife and I watched UnHerd from Germany nearly the whole US ELECTION night and it was a gas. Regards.
Emily is brilliant!
Smart woman .... she tells the truth how refreshing.
What'd she say?
appreciate this type of summary content, beats wading through US legacy and social media.
Take a shot every time you hear the word “hawkish”.
Yep. Really annoyed me. And what does it mean ?????
@@lizgilbert9129 , it’s just a political buzzword that gets used a lot. It basically just means aggressive or intense on a particular matter. I’ve always assumed it comes from how a hawk studies and attacks prey.
It's an extremely important distiction if you care about going to war(s).
@@JB-Monby particular matter you mean wasted taxes and dead babies
It means warmonger
Emily should be one of those podcast asking great questions for Unhurd....🇺🇸
She has a podcast on unherd lol it's called undercurrents.
Eh…?
Why is every candidate held to the opinion of Tucker Carlson. Don't give him so much power
Because he's brilliant and honest
Thanks Freddy
Very interesting times ahead
Matt Is a chess move and withdrawn his pick !
Outsiders hellbent on reforming an entrenched bureaucracy will need to surround themselves with experienced, low-profile insiders who agree with reformist goals. That can happen, but it is not guaranteed. And I don't see Trump tolerating the existence of anyone who outshines him. Musk's days asTrump's BBF are numbered.
Musk is the definition of conflict of interest
I don’t think she said “hawkish” enough
Sad when that’s the best description for plenty of people in the federal government. War-monger would be a proper description too.
Wow honest opinions. More please
Just got a alert matt G just withdraw his nomination...
Confirmed on twitter.
Good.
Dr. Oz lost PA because he didn't know their sports teams. Fetterman was at least from PA.
Thanks!
Yes Tsun Tzu said “Know your enemy and know yourself “ so an outsider has a 50% chance of implementing change, at best
The first ever us secretary of defense was an ex boxer turned wall street finance man, let's not get carried away with the experience required
They all share one common trait: they are all the top reality tv stars. There was always the danger that when we fell in love with reality tv, it would become reality.
Vance will be President of the Senate. If He can't get majorities next year, he'd settle for a tie. Elon and Vivek have his back. THEY ARE NOT BACK STABBERS, THANK GgD.
These administrative decisions seem appropriately aligned with the current times 🤡
Trump is gathering himself a team of idiosyncratic apprentices similar to his 'apprentice' TV show.
Who's going to get fired first?
Detective of Money Politics is following this very informative content and cheers from VK3GFS and 73s from Frank from Melbourne Australia
She talks almost as fast as Shapiro.
urgh... The Hill
She left for Breaking Points lol
thanks for providing the best honest and unbiased information
All the antiwar people seem to have a massive blind spot for Israel's genocide.... Who can't you critisize?...
That’s false. Most antiwar people, left and right, are all either hostile, or indifferent, to the Israel-Palestine conflict, or they condemn what you (erroneously) call “Israel's genocide.”
Americans are just tired of all the noise coming from Israel, they hope Trump will end it even if it means fast-tracking Israel's annexation of Gaza. They don't really view that as a war, they believe Israel is fighting terrorist and quickest way to end it is help Israel annihilate them. So in a sense they are antiwar because they want the conflict to be ended once and for all. Allowing Gaza exist would mean that wars will continue to erupt in the future. My bet is that by the end of Trump's second term Palestinian idea will be dead, no one will ever even consider two state solution that only democrats were talking about anyway.
Tucker Carlson & Russ Vought - Break Down DOGE and Trump's cabinet picks
There are some interesting ways that Trump and RFK Jr. connect. For instance, Trump doesn't like offshore windmills, and RFK Jr. said they should be removed because they are whale killers. RFK Jr. accuses the Democrats of ignoring toxic chemicals in favor of a climate agenda.
Toxic chemicals are a valid environmental concern. The climate agenda is 100% bogus.
Use presume too much a little bit too negative but are entitled to your opinion
Apparently Matt Gaetz wasn’t worth the political capital…
It's called a recess appointment.
You can tell Emily’s been listening to mearsheimer lectures 😂 I love it
Your argument that more establishment people have more ability to tear down an establishment is ludicrous do you make the argument that all DEI positions should be old white men because they have the most experience with old white men and would be best suited to tear down old white men?
There might be some truth to that argument - if it refers to people who were previously in the establishment, but are now apostates.
DEI shouldn't even exist.
A reality based, unbiased Journalist in America?
That’s the third one I have seen in less than a month. What gives?
Disaster
Didn’t trump try using more insiders the first time?
The press room should be of podcast only for 4yrs,the big 3 is out....
The louder the establishment moans and cries about Trump’s picks, the more we know they’re good for the country and bad for the establishment
Trump's goal is about the future. The majority of his picks are young, successful, and can communicate in front of the camera. These are the key ingredients to winning an election. IMO we are not only good for the next four years, but good for the next 12 years. That is a very deep bench. He can't afford another repeat of the state going after him after he leaves office.
Get Kim Scheppele on the show, she'll explain it perfectly, not that you already know what's going on.
What does hockish? hawkish? Mean?
Hawkish/dovish is the dichotomy used to describe a politician's approach to foreign policy.
A hawk is someone who is more keen to intervene in foreign affairs, militarily if need be, a dove is someone who is very hesitant to do so.
@@nicobruin8618outstanding desription.
The term hackish is often associated with an unjustified drive for violence, and I believe it deserves reconsideration. You should consider creating a special feature on China's hackish maneuvers in Latin America and their connection to the migrant crisis, particularly in the case of Venezuela. By the way, I recall the not so great piece on Venezuela you ran a few months ago.
Hackish or hawkish?
@@Lobishomem Thanks, I meant hawkish.
Great analysis - thanks!
Trump will be VP in #2028. I think all these people need to show fast results. Great analysis👍
Stop trying to start that stupid stuff. No one can run as VP when they have already been president for 2 terms.
This is silly. Are you a Democrat or just an undercover CIA trying to start stuff?
Superb analysis.
** Hegseth Experience: Actually, it is not unusual for secretary, defense to have his amount of experience-or even less. Case in points: during the Bush administration secretary, defense, Donald Rumsfeld who had even less experience.
TRUMP, the wind of change😅
I love Emily. See her play… 1:15 1:19
Elon Musk convinced Joe Rogan to endorse Trump.
It's just impossible for some people to consider the thought that people can come to their own support of trump eh.
'unconventional'
Yeah, I noticed that too.
Women in journalism and public life - the only thing that matters is who slept with whom. What has any of this got do with public policy and running a government ?
The problem is not the women but the other party and the hangers on.
You don't think personal responsibility and morality has any bearing on how someone will fulfil their public duties?
Bill Clinton and Epstein agree
@@JakubMMajewski In practice, it doesn’t. Think of all the successful or effective politicians who’ve had morally reprehensible personal behaviour.
@@kevinmcfarlane2752 You used the words "successful or effective" - this is notable, because these words do not suggest the politician in question actually did anything good. For example, Stalin was certainly both successful and effective, but Russia would almost certainly have been better off if Stalin had been ineffectual. There are other measures of fulfilling public duties, beyond effectiveness. It is good for society, if a morally upstanding politician is effective. If, however, the politican is not morally upstanding - then from the perspective of society, the less effective they are, the better.
Underage women?
Emily doesn’t understand what redundancy means. It is not efficiency. Redundancy in organizational terms is a good thing- if person A or system A is out, then person B or system B can fill in. Having only one person in the government that can fulfill a task is not efficient. If a two people have different roles day to day but can fill in for each other if needed, that is redundancy. So you can fire 3 people and train 2 people to do those 3 people’s jobs. That’s more redundancy AND more efficiency.
RFK junior an idealist 😂 . He’s a menace.
Sorry but no.
Your mocking voice gives you away.
You both want more nice discourse ?
i want action.
Amen!
UnHerd is not intended to be a MAGA talking shop. I do watch and enjoy MAGA and other conservative content, but I also like to consume content somewhat like this, for a different perspective.
I've heard the lefts perspective.
I just wish she would slow her rate of speaking.
I’m so happy he picked a strong and experienced true public servant in Rubio.
Lifelong politician, not public servant. Serving the public would mean not living off our taxes your entire career.
After watching this it is hard to not have a much more pessimistic view.
RFK who I think can clean up (because he has the knowledge about the departments he will be overseeing, and has long has plans on how to do it), I don't have so much doubt about; and I think he will stay in his lane on the environmental issues because he is smart enough to pick his battles.
Other than that, I don't see much of the ... cleaning up of 3 letter agencies, stopping wars and foreign meddling, return of privacy and freedom and the fight to remove censorship, stopping environmentalism lies and propaganda machinery and indoctrination of our children and young, stopping the revolving doors mechanisms and general systemic corruption, making life hard for woke idiocy (in all its forms).
Where is all of that in this ? Is it going to be like last time .. lotsa hot air, but not able to change anything about the big machine after all ?
Everyone except Matt Gaetz would do fine as long as the Senate and House don’t try to block them. Pete definitely could do the job, if you’ve read his books I don’t think he’s naive at all about the Bureaucracy
They won’t be able to get it all done. But if they can get half, or even a third, of it done that would be amazing.
Wow
This Gaetz person sounds hands-down awful, even for having the imprisoned self-confessed liar Joel Greenberg as his “best” friend, no matter if “ex”.
The quality of these two people (who got elected or appointed) is beyond bad - both are without conscience.
Well, at least Gaetz is out of the picture. There goes one unqualified moron. The question is which is the next unqualified and inexperienced moron he'll choose now. Isn't Dr. Phil available?
I literally just made that exact joke to someone, only sadly I wasn’t really joking.
So I guess you’re ok with Biden, Harris and their band of “qualified professionals” who have got us to the brink of nuclear war with Russia.
I hope you’re a Brit and not an American. The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result.
🫣🫢😶🤪😂🤣😂🤣😂
Well, they're all better than you.......
Emily thought Trump would loose, so why care what she has to say lol😂
She predicted he'd lose, which is fair. She didn't lie and say Kamala would win by 400 points, and she certainly didn't HOPE it.
You're right, the moment someone gets one thing wrong we should forever stop listening to what they have to say on every subject.
We should only listen to people who have never gotten anything wrong.
@@nicobruin8618 specially polarized elections, something so easy to predict.
What does that have to do with anything? I thought Trump was going to loose, I am happy he won but in my view it was unexpected.
Can`t stand Carlson. Got played by Putin
Tulsi Gabbard went straight to Trump Tower in 2016 to as Trump for the same cabinet-level positions she's looking for now, Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense. She might've endorsed Sanders but when she did so she called him "a strong leader", in keeping with her pro-authoritarian views.
Gabbard is an expert in psychological warfare and she tends to use her expertise to lobby against the US on almost every issue; she's done a lot to hide her radical religious views and she's definitely not America First.
How does she have radical religious views?
@herrrobert5340 She was brought up in the Science of Identity Foundation, led by Chris Butler, a counterculture communist anti-war activist that broke with the Hare Krishna movement and founded his own religion. Her father is one of the most anti-gay politicians and Tulsi's hostile attitudes towards Islam are evident in her voting record and support for the War on Terror. Her aunt, recently murdered by a close friend, believes that Tulsi's views seem motivated by Butler's extremism:
“Once again I find my niece’s apparent penchant for parroting extremist toadies such as Tucker Carlson and vile ‘strongmen’ such as Vladimir Putin, to be problematic and deeply troubling,” Sinavaiana Gabbard, a retired professor of English at the University of Hawaii, told The Independent.
“It gives me no pleasure to note that Tulsi’s single governing principle seems to be expedience, which is in effect no principle at all.”
Tulsi's political career has led her to conceal the most controversial aspects of her religion, saying that she is a practicing Hindu and that she regrets her support for homosexual conversion therapy. However, given the pattern she's following, she seems to behave like most politicians, especially religiously motivated politicians, that conceal their true beliefs in exchange for more power and authority.
@@ErinMagner82 not all bad then lmao
@@vesterwolf Yeah I dunno about being emotionally manipulated by an opportunistic cult leader as a child as being a good thing. Usually a yogi is a Sadguru type, not someone that supports the War on Terror. It's the combination of things that sets off alarm bells, but yeah I guess a lot of people are fooled by Christian apologists too.
First view first like first comment.
Joke podcast