I bet somewhere on this planet any american citizen once said 3 minutes in the rest of the world are 2:46 in the USA. That‘s why they still don‘t use the metric system ;)
@@vitorossi7839 Yeah, Soviet/Russian planes are designed to tolerate a landing with the gear up and still be flyable without major repairs afterwards, so I doubt a heard landing would do much.
Spent a few hours once watching planes land at Corfu airport and each time there was this weird noise. So now I know it was wake turbulence. I thought it was an oddity of the acoustics of the lagoon at the end of the airport.
Actually the F35 was a Royal Air Force/ Royal Navy Air Fleet test pilot testing the landing capabilities of the aircraft on the HMS Queen Elizabeth just after she was commisioned and on shake down deployment for the crew. And if you had taken the time, you'd have seen the RAF roundel just front of the cockpit.
I don't think airliners use reverse thrust anymore because some bean counter figured it's cheaper to replace brake pads than burn up so much fuel to stop the airliner.
In 1976, at Nellis AFB, NV, a navy pilot flew a jet black F-4 with a Playboy bunny painted on the vertical stab. He deployed the chute while still in a flare above the runway. It was awesome. I was watching him from the top of an F-111 on the flightline.
The B757 has notoriously strong wing tip vortices... as I recall, ATC applies the same spacing behind for following aircraft as are used for 'heavy' aircraft.
In the early 80's I was stationed at Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station. I watched an F-14 Tomcat accidently deployed its chute right after take-off. He hit his after burners and pitched up. Looked like an unintentional cobra maneuver. Thick black smoked billowed of the chute until it detached from the plane. Of course the pilot turned around and headed back to the runway. I wonder how long it took him to live that down....If ever.
Are you sure you are not talking about F-4 Phantom? As far as I know, that's the only american navy fighter jet with a drag chute. And I am not even sure the navy variant had a drag chute. Air Force jets often have drag chute. F-16 and F-35A for example, of modern era fighters. On the other hand F-15 does not because it's massive air brake is enough. American jet drag chutes are seldom used because they are meant for really short or bombed runways, or harsh conditions like ice on the runway. When you need to stop in a hurry.
3 Minutes of Aviation wouldn't be the same without clickbaity titles, the occasional overeager plane spotter, and all the aviation nerds finding fault in every clip lol
I lived under the heathrow flight path for 10 years. That wake turbulance would kick in about 15 seconds after a big bird flew over. Always blew my mind.
Nope, the pilot deployed the chute too early. According to Yahoo News, the plane nearly overshot the runway so that is probably why the pilot 'stepped on the brakes.' No sane pilot, regardless of the aircraft, would deploy the braking parachute with the plane still in the air.
before anyone says this is a clickbait channel,it is not.by the way,the 757 was actually called a heavy,even though it was narrow,because of its powerful wake turbulence.boeing tends to have a habit of wake turbulence.......lets not forget 587.when pilot error combined with a airbus design flaw made it dive when the pilot tried to stop wake turbulence by shaking the rudder.
The DA 42 oil trail is about normal for a DC6. Stitting next to the port wing on a flight on a DC6b back in 1960 I watched a constant stream of oil flowing over the enginge cowlings and wings. However the props kept turning!
i mean soviet jets were designed for such landings. The doctrine surrounding them made it so they could be able to land on "road airfields" (just a litteral wider stretch of road, going in a straight line. seen a couple in my life) so basically the landing gear was made to be extra durable for such landings in case of the regular airfields being bombed
It's just the way to make a "short landing" with a su22, no mistakes, just the textbook maneuver ...By the way this a F35B from the Marine Corps not US Navy at all
to be fair to the anti 3 min of aviation,that was a amphibious thingy.ok,i dont even remember the name.but i remember it had amphibious somewhere......... and to be fair to my side,he/she makes videos,not lessons.
The good news is that on the Diamonds, an engine out is a low drama event. The bad news is, the FAA, IRS, and others so trashed the light plane market that Diamond is now a ChiCom company.
The pilot of the Polish Su-22 intentionally released his parachute at such an altitude to reduce his speed and shorten his run-in. The pilot has very high skills. Normally, a braking parachute is released immediately after touchdown.
Он недоучка и бывший двоечник. Летел на повышенной скорости, парашют мог оторваться. Это предпосылка к лётному происшествию. За такую бездарную посадку должны были отстранить от полётов.
Back in a former life when I worked on Phantoms, pilots were regularly deploying the brake chute just before landing, I have no idea what they were trying to achieve (other than stressing the mechanism and the chute).
The engine failure was caused by the oil leak, not the other way around. Also, that was not an aircraft carrier. It's what used to be designated as an LHA. Granted, they are based on the USS Wasp - a WWII aircraft carrier.
That wasn't an aircraft carrier. It was an amphibious assault ship, either an LHA or LHD class. F-35B's don't land vertically on carriers. That's why there's strictly a carrier-based F-35C variant.
I sometimes hear a similar noise when a landing Airbus A320 series aircraft flies over at about 5000'. I wondered what it was, could it be wake turbulence noise too?
Su 22 landing during the air show in 2019. Opening a chute was a part of practice in the Polish Air Force. The landing gear of Russian planes are much more durable than their Western counterparts. Still a harsh landing.
I always thought it was automatic the parachute being deploy !! ?I saw a couple of F- 4 Phantoms land and deploy their parachutes in September just gone ! As they landed .
Assuming the triple has a QTAW, AAL probably exceeded it with that much brake energy. I hope they weren't expecting a fast turn around. (QTAW may just be a 737 Max thing with the carbon brakes though.)
The Su-22 has deployed the chute on purpose for demostration, they can do that as the MiG-29 they can provoke a shorter flare and the gear is strong enough to absorb the impact, this plane was ok to fly again!!
better since the plane would have more airspeed, having more lift and needing less power to stay up which gives it more head room if it needs to go around
Millisei hääli mina kuulsin stagna ajal Ämari lennuvälja läheduses kalasatades kui MIG-id harjutasid maandumist.Maapinnani jäi kümmekond meetrit kui käivitati forssaaz.Lärm oli meeletu,terve sisikond tahtis välja rabeleda.
What happens when a commercial jet smokes it's breaks that bad? Are they required to check them out, or are the brakes expected to take a certain amount of abuse like this?👍✌🎄🤶🎅
Brakes used on commercial jets are on another level. To me it just looks like a cold day so we can better see how hot the brakes actually get. The brakes and everything else offcourse are visually inspected before next flight.
@@henninghellerud I've had high performance brakes on a car, and when I was using them heavy they would light up Orange! But, never smoked the pads, and I can imagine plane brakes being of at least the quality of my expensive auto brakes, probably the same, but much, much larger!😅
no, it didn't. but I bet it feels really good to look as ignorant as the people who posted this crap. Standard short field Su22 Manouver. See it at any air show in Poland or talk to any Su 22 vet
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
3 Minutes of aviation but the video is only 2:46 long. Inflation hits everyone.
It’s close enough!
I bet somewhere on this planet any american citizen once said 3 minutes in the rest of the world are 2:46 in the USA.
That‘s why they still don‘t use the metric system ;)
lol
@@boerieza Bet it took 14 seconds to complain about the length of the video. If so, they got their 3 minutes of entertainment.
He deployed his parachute too s-
The TUI wake turbulence was crisp
HAWK TUI
Ruined the moment @@oceso
Crisp? Who says that? Tard
@@ocesoget a new line looser
That wake turbulence sound was incredible!
Wow! That wake turbulence noise was amazing.
The parachute wasn't too early. It was part of training 😂😂😂
exactly, training to exit runway ASAP
Those tires went pop though and the harsh drop potentially damaged the landing gear and the frame besides it. All in all it was pretty botched.
@@Laerei given it's a Sukhoi plane, i highly doubt that this landing would damage the landing gear in any significant manner.
@@vitorossi7839 Yeah, Soviet/Russian planes are designed to tolerate a landing with the gear up and still be flyable without major repairs afterwards, so I doubt a heard landing would do much.
@@Laerei As far as I know the case. No damage was recorded. I don't think they consider jet tyres a damage.
Spent a few hours once watching planes land at Corfu airport and each time there was this weird noise. So now I know it was wake turbulence. I thought it was an oddity of the acoustics of the lagoon at the end of the airport.
Bombardier small jets also make wild wake turbulence noises too. Spent a few afternoons at YOW watching and listening... pretty eerie.
Marine corps F-35B landing on an amphibious assault ship
Edit: bruh, it calls the F-35 an Air Force jet in the description. Make up your mind lmao
I came here to write this comment
Actually the F35 was a Royal Air Force/ Royal Navy Air Fleet test pilot testing the landing capabilities of the aircraft on the HMS Queen Elizabeth just after she was commisioned and on shake down deployment for the crew. And if you had taken the time, you'd have seen the RAF roundel just front of the cockpit.
@@Bacchus173 A That is not the HMS QE. B You can see the stripes on the roundel showing that it is a US roundel and not the RAF. Thanks for playing.
@@plastictsubasa1390 Same....lol
@@plastictsubasa1390me too
Amazing footage and thrilling moments! The hard landings and wake turbulence sounds are intense, and that F-35 vertical landing is a must-see!
This channel must be run by a bot. The USN does not fly that plane. The MARINES do.
Wait - on the last one, wasn't it the oil leak which caused the engine failure in the first place?
Orrr - did something on the engine 'fail' to cause the oil leak? d'oh ... ;-0
Just hope the other engine was not serviced by the same guy.....
This was normal oil leakage.
Oil leak: interesting to clearly see the feathered prop.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183lol, no.
1:04 "incredible stuff" => just some hot brakes... 🤣🤣🤣
Yes I'm sure you see that live in front of you every day.
I've never seen it, so, yeah, pretty incredible
@@AudieHolland It's not a big deal mate... come one 😅😂
@@thessalonician You're the one making a big deal out of it.
The F-35B is the US Marine Corps version not the Navy's version and that is an Amphibious Assault Ship not an aircraft carrier.
Well, it does carry an aircraft 😅
SW is out of line, but he is not wrong.
@@Sierra-Whisky still not technically an aircraft carrier
@@gibbo_303 seriously!? Ok, thnx.
takes way too much time to get it on deck.
I didn't know wake turbulence even makes a noise at all😮😅
That sounds very cool and kinda like a sci-fi sound effect.
Smokin brakes on that American triple "incredible stuff". You've got some low expectations in life SDTV 😂
there are people watching 20 grown men pass a ball between each other and even riot when a team wins or lose, so yeah, we can say incredible stuff 🤣🤣
I don't think airliners use reverse thrust anymore because some bean counter figured it's cheaper to replace brake pads than burn up so much fuel to stop the airliner.
*EXCELLENT+++ variety on this one!*
In 1976, at Nellis AFB, NV, a navy pilot flew a jet black F-4 with a Playboy bunny painted on the vertical stab. He deployed the chute while still in a flare above the runway. It was awesome. I was watching him from the top of an F-111 on the flightline.
The B757 has notoriously strong wing tip vortices... as I recall, ATC applies the same spacing behind for following aircraft as are used for 'heavy' aircraft.
Doesn’t the 757 rate as a heavy? Odd does that only apply to double aisle sized aircraft?
In the early 80's I was stationed at Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station. I watched an F-14 Tomcat accidently deployed its chute right after take-off. He hit his after burners and pitched up. Looked like an unintentional cobra maneuver. Thick black smoked billowed of the chute until it detached from the plane. Of course the pilot turned around and headed back to the runway. I wonder how long it took him to live that down....If ever.
F14 with a chute???
Are you sure you are not talking about F-4 Phantom? As far as I know, that's the only american navy fighter jet with a drag chute. And I am not even sure the navy variant had a drag chute. Air Force jets often have drag chute. F-16 and F-35A for example, of modern era fighters. On the other hand F-15 does not because it's massive air brake is enough. American jet drag chutes are seldom used because they are meant for really short or bombed runways, or harsh conditions like ice on the runway. When you need to stop in a hurry.
F-35 was landing on an LHA / D. Landing Assault Ship. Not a "carrier".
So I wasnt the only one :)
@@dangernoodle235 you were not the only one. It almost looks like the LHD-4 Boxer.
Does it carry airplanes? Then its a carrier. 😝 (but yes its defiantly not the GR Ford)
@@rharbarenko. Yes use to carry AV-8 Harriers but now F-35’s
Only because we're Americans, to everyone else, that is what a carrier is, we have floating airports too.
3 Minutes of Aviation wouldn't be the same without clickbaity titles, the occasional overeager plane spotter, and all the aviation nerds finding fault in every clip lol
Do you think the faults are intentional, fishing for comments?
@@willdejong7763 👍Engagement is king
Misinformation is a huge problem. They're doing their bit to correct it.
I like the SU-22 airbrake.
1:21 okay THIS surprised me! I was like how can you hear wale turbulence, and then….!
I lived under the heathrow flight path for 10 years. That wake turbulance would kick in about 15 seconds after a big bird flew over. Always blew my mind.
1:36 This is awesome!
Sadly, no Aerosucre
They've been quiet lately, at least on this channel.
Deploying the chute early is standard procedure for a SU-22
yep, two major mistakes/clickbaits in one clip...not cool
@@Jedif82 This channel has been very click batey. Which is annoying because it doesn't need to be.
🤷♂
Is it also standard practice to slam the tail into the ground because of a stall after you've deployed the chute?
Nope, the pilot deployed the chute too early. According to Yahoo News, the plane nearly overshot the runway so that is probably why the pilot 'stepped on the brakes.'
No sane pilot, regardless of the aircraft, would deploy the braking parachute with the plane still in the air.
That is an assault ship, not an aircraft carrier ;)
Well that changes everything! 🙄
@@gpaull2 This is the internet, pedantry is mandatory :D
It's also a Marine F35. Navy doesn't fly the B model.
@@crystallineentitybut to be even more pedantic, it is a ship carrying an aircraft. Who cares? Does it really matter that much?
@@timweather3847 To those who are in or have been in the Navy and have served on these ships, yes, it does matter.
before anyone says this is a clickbait channel,it is not.by the way,the 757 was actually called a heavy,even though it was narrow,because of its powerful wake turbulence.boeing tends to have a habit of wake turbulence.......lets not forget 587.when pilot error combined with a airbus design flaw made it dive when the pilot tried to stop wake turbulence by shaking the rudder.
@@thetruthbehindplanes brahhh i can't go anywhere without finding you 😭
1:23 that sounded like teletubbies windmill
Marine Corps F-35 variant, not a Navy F-35 variant and landing on an LHA by the markings, not an Aircraft Carrier!
The US Navy does not fly the F-35B. That is the US Marines.
1:24 such an amazing sound
good video 🤙
The commentary of the landings are incredibly unbelievably ANNOYING
They’re being live streamed
Thumbs 👎🏻
Are they any better on your channel? 🤔
Annoying is a big understatement. I was thinking of some expletives for the commentary.
Then don't watch then.
That wake turbulence sound had me thing K.I.T.T. from Knight Rider was about to show up....lol
The DA 42 oil trail is about normal for a DC6. Stitting next to the port wing on a flight on a DC6b back in 1960 I watched a constant stream of oil flowing over the enginge cowlings and wings. However the props kept turning!
Have a safe flight...
i mean soviet jets were designed for such landings. The doctrine surrounding them made it so they could be able to land on "road airfields" (just a litteral wider stretch of road, going in a straight line. seen a couple in my life) so basically the landing gear was made to be extra durable for such landings in case of the regular airfields being bombed
✅❤️👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼 thumbs up, my favorite aviation channel ever!!!!! Thanks you so much 🙏🏼✝️
It's just the way to make a "short landing" with a su22, no mistakes, just the textbook maneuver ...By the way this a F35B from the Marine Corps not US Navy at all
These spotters like the sound of their own voices ffs.
Yet you still watch them. Go figure.
Finally a NOT CLICKBAIT tittle! That plane definitely did not like the landing.
It did everything ok, they were training short landing, the smoke was from the tires -> no damage to the airframe....
Marine Corps F-35, not Navy.
Who cares, both are fascist
Not an aircraft carrier either.
Didn’t they give the F-35 to the Marines so that they could land on a carrier also?😂
to be fair to the anti 3 min of aviation,that was a amphibious thingy.ok,i dont even remember the name.but i remember it had amphibious somewhere.........
and to be fair to my side,he/she makes videos,not lessons.
Same thing
it is not too early. they actually train to deploy parachute while still airborne
it was still a little early, or more rather, he was just abit too high
Why wouldn't wake turbulence have its very own sound? Thank you for learning me sthg new today too 1:23.
That last clip looked expensive......
Yep. I was thinking (as well as the pilot) ‘This will be expensive’
expense is the last thing to worry about , I wonder if they were able land safely with 1 engine on a small plane
1:00 were they Brembo ceramics?
Ah so that’s the sound I hear as planes suddenly come over where I live out in rural NZ. It always starts with that whooping sound.
Same here in semi-rural Surrey, UK - always wondered what it was. Sometimes it goes back up again.
Nice vid
You haven’t even fully watched it yet 😂
@ sorry for supporting my favourite content creator
@@AirCadet_1I know, my favourite as well but I’m just saying that you can’t say anything before you haven’t watched full video yet
@ damn come you’re dangerous issues Bro
It would be funny if you watched it and it was utter ass
Aircraft mechanic here, the oil on that last one was the blackest I’ve ever seen, I’m seriously questioning the maintenance on that plane.
The good news is that on the Diamonds, an engine out is a low drama event. The bad news is, the FAA, IRS, and others so trashed the light plane market that Diamond is now a ChiCom company.
I love when the navy performs their iconic vtol landings and when the marine corps land using a breaking wire
other way around but yeah
The pilot of the Polish Su-22 intentionally released his parachute at such an altitude to reduce his speed and shorten his run-in. The pilot has very high skills. Normally, a braking parachute is released immediately after touchdown.
Он недоучка и бывший двоечник. Летел на повышенной скорости, парашют мог оторваться. Это предпосылка к лётному происшествию. За такую бездарную посадку должны были отстранить от полётов.
757 The Brilliant
Back in a former life when I worked on Phantoms, pilots were regularly deploying the brake chute just before landing, I have no idea what they were trying to achieve (other than stressing the mechanism and the chute).
Wake turbulence sounded scary, like UFO
Airplane can fly okay with one engine operating still, just slower than before!😊
Great video!
Cool
The engine failure was caused by the oil leak, not the other way around. Also, that was not an aircraft carrier. It's what used to be designated as an LHA. Granted, they are based on the USS Wasp - a WWII aircraft carrier.
I don’t think the engine failure caused the oil leak, more likely the oil leak caused the engine failure!
Ah so the noise I hear when planes fly over is wake turbulence.
I come from this city. Su-22 is an invention :) Świdwin greets :)
That wasn't an aircraft carrier. It was an amphibious assault ship, either an LHA or LHD class. F-35B's don't land vertically on carriers. That's why there's strictly a carrier-based F-35C variant.
Fair enough. Still a vessel of some description.
I sometimes hear a similar noise when a landing Airbus A320 series aircraft flies over at about 5000'. I wondered what it was, could it be wake turbulence noise too?
So the engine failure caused the severe oil leak?
That SU-22 going to need a new set of tyres.
Su 22 landing during the air show in 2019. Opening a chute was a part of practice in the Polish Air Force. The landing gear of Russian planes are much more durable than their Western counterparts. Still a harsh landing.
who needs a chiropractor when u can hop in an su22 and do a ryanair landing
Deployment of the parachute in Su-22 at 6 ft is a trick to reduce landing roll, practiced for more than 20 years.
F-35 vertical landings are noisy, but an osprey is like 3x louder and vibrates the ground 1/2 mile away
I don't know who the shouty b-end was and I'm glad.
The TUI wake turbulence sounds the the ja-37 griphen
that is why we need two engines.
Is not too early. It's common practice in Polish Air Force to land on short runways as roads.
No ceramic pads?😮
That wasn't early. That was para-braking with style.
1:34 that’s not an aircraft carrier
If you’re such an expert on these matters why didn’t you tell us what it is, if not an aircraft carrier?
@ I’m not really an expert, but I believe it is an amphibious assault ship used by the US marines
@inncogneato6341 It's an amphibious assault ship. Any 15 year old who likes military stuff knows this. You live in a hole kid? Lol
That’s,a “drag chute” not a parachute!
I bet that was a hard landing. Ouch. Surprised it still flew at all after popping the chute 20 feet off the ground.
Vertical landing... well... the Harrier did this already 40 years ago, so nothing special.
And a helluva lot cheaper.
I don't think it was the sound of waketurbulences, it was the Doppler effect.
I always thought it was automatic the parachute being deploy !! ?I saw a couple of F- 4 Phantoms land and deploy their parachutes in September just gone ! As they landed .
Hey, the title was actually not clickbait for once.
What causes the smoke in that American 777
heat
You owe us 13 seconds of aviation footage
Assuming the triple has a QTAW, AAL probably exceeded it with that much brake energy. I hope they weren't expecting a fast turn around. (QTAW may just be a 737 Max thing with the carbon brakes though.)
The Su-22 has deployed the chute on purpose for demostration, they can do that as the MiG-29 they can provoke a shorter flare and the gear is strong enough to absorb the impact, this plane was ok to fly again!!
That's a USMC F-35 not US Navy, the Navy is only equipped with the C variant which doesn't have VTOL capability.
How well could that landing be done if the aircraft carrier was actually moving?
About as well. I've seen many clips.
better since the plane would have more airspeed, having more lift and needing less power to stay up which gives it more head room if it needs to go around
U.S. Navy operates F-35C, which does not have VSTOL capability. the aircraft shown, a F-35B, is operated by the U.S. Marine Corps.
The F-35B is flown by the US Marines. The Navy and some Marine Squadrons fly the F-35C.
That is a USMC F-35B the Navy doesn't operate the vstol version
2:17 *Not feathered?*
I'll never stop being amazed at the power that F-35 has to produce to pull off a vertical landing
Now reusing old videos? Sad
There's nothing unusual about early drag chute deployment.
Bro landed like a fucking DJI Mavick
Ahh yes, the 2JZ-GTE swapped 757 and its STUTUTU blow off valve noise
Millisei hääli mina kuulsin stagna ajal Ämari lennuvälja läheduses kalasatades kui MIG-id harjutasid maandumist.Maapinnani jäi kümmekond meetrit kui käivitati forssaaz.Lärm oli meeletu,terve sisikond tahtis välja rabeleda.
What happens when a commercial jet smokes it's breaks that bad? Are they required to check them out, or are the brakes expected to take a certain amount of abuse like this?👍✌🎄🤶🎅
BRAKES. And you don't touch them...they are hot.
Brakes used on commercial jets are on another level. To me it just looks like a cold day so we can better see how hot the brakes actually get. The brakes and everything else offcourse are visually inspected before next flight.
@@henninghellerud I've had high performance brakes on a car, and when I was using them heavy they would light up Orange! But, never smoked the pads, and I can imagine plane brakes being of at least the quality of my expensive auto brakes, probably the same, but much, much larger!😅
And the Polish Airforce pilot’s career also landed likewise.
no, it didn't. but I bet it feels really good to look as ignorant as the people who posted this crap. Standard short field Su22 Manouver. See it at any air show in Poland or talk to any Su 22 vet