Police Don't Understand Your Rights -- A Lawyer Explains
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
- In this episode, Ian Runkle dissects the recent Leduc RCMP Press Release, delving into the Traffic Safety Act, the challenges with stunting as a charge, and how it intersects with political expression. He then explores potential scenarios under stunting, addressing the Leduc RCMP's misinterpretation of the law, and wraps up with acknowledgements and final thoughts.
leducnow.ca/2023/11/22/leduc-...
Cases:
* R. v. Wells: www.canlii.org/en/ab/abpc/doc...
* R. v. Jones: www.canlii.org/en/ab/abca/doc...
* R. v. Pawloski: www.canlii.org/en/ab/abpc/doc...
0:00 Introduction and topic overview
0:25 Leduc RCMP Press Release discussion
2:03 Examination of the Traffic Safety Act
4:10 Challenges with stunting as a charge
6:27 Political expression and its protection
8:52 Potential scenarios under stunting
10:00 Leduc RCMP's misinterpretation of the law
11:43 Closing remarks and Patreon supporter acknowledgements
12:11 Final thoughts and sign off
Patreon: / runkleofthebailey
Locals: runkleofthebailey.locals.com/
BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay
All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.
I personally don’t want fragile people protecting and serving my community, I want strong intelligent people doing the job effectively.
I think writing a ticket is a pretty efficient way to end a tantrum.
Never met a bully that didn't have an ego that is fragile as glass.
Well most will need to quit
those kinds of people dont serve in a policing force/RCMP lmfao like are you mentally aware of everything rn?
Well you’re not very bright then, are you?
How thick does someone have to be not to realize that whenever a cop abuses authority to harass, detain, ticket, or arrest someone for offending them, they're proving that person right. Yet there are _so many_ police who are exactly that thick.
If you have a high I.Q. , they will not let you join the police force.
There is a court case out of San Diago, California. A man was rejected for being too intelligent,he sued the police department and lost.so yea, you can only be an idiot to be a police officer. At least in California USA..
I don't think abusive cops care about being right. It's about punishing to establish dominance. The same broken logic as in this line supposedly from the old world approach to military discipline
"The beatings will continue until morale improves"
As some American courts have ruled, intelligence is NOT, repeat, NOT a requirement to becoming a member of law enforcement. And, as Mr. Steve Lehto has recently pointed out on his channel, some schools in Louisiana are selling HS diplomas for less than $500 , which provides a ready source of 'education' for potential recruits seeking to become members of the 'brotherhood of the badge".
@@cementer7665 It's not just not a requirement, it's a detriment. _Jordan v. New London_ really put it all out there for everyone to see.
@@cementer7665 corrections, brotherhood of tugs and tax collectors
RCMP: We're going to keep writing you tickets until you stop hating us.
So today the bird IS the word.
Most drivers look when a cop as someone pulled over. Guess the police pulling someone over is 'stunting'.
Good point!
I guess drivers involved in accidents would get a stunting charge too, now wouldn't they? We could play with this for a while, couldn't we? Cheers.
i spent 5 miles in 1st gear on the highway a week ago. the reason, two cars somehow got together and hit the center divide on the other side of the road. they must have been "stunting" too. not in whatever caused the crash, but in the effect they had on traffic.
@@michaelheurkens4538 It's pretty cute that you think you had a point
Wasn't it Bill Blair who said it's important that laws are vague so the crown may use them however they like?
well Bill is an evil bastard so no surprise there
That's not necessarily a bill blair interpretation but a British Common Law thing
Treasonous is the WEF GLOBALIST liberal government!
It's amazing that they continue with making laws purposely vauge.
It's such a corrupt concept.
Bill Blair never met a human right he wouldn't violate. That f needs to be charged with crimes against humanity
I remember seeing an article that a Quebec judge said flipping the bird was a God-given right.
That's called "precedent" 😃
Several Quebec municipalities also have bylaws under which expressing yourself of giving them the bird is ‘insulting a police officer in the performance of their duties’ $500 fine.
No, in this country. They don't care, the response to the pandemic and the Freedom Convoys, made THAT fact abundantly clear.
after the convoy cops are public enemy #2 after Justanahole he is #1 give cops the finger every chance I get
Those were but drops in the bucket of end times signs.
People fighting like animals over TP, what will they do when true chaos rears its ugly head as prophecied?
Do you mean the Karen Convoy?
@richardpaquette8429 the convoy of special snowflakes
@@briannyob7799 🤣
When in doubt, the police will write up charges and let the courts sort it out. This, followed by overzealous prosecutors, turns the process into the punishment as of result of speech / actions the police don't like.
the process is the punishment
@@mck24601 Coutts men that are political prisoners.Tamara Lich ,on going $$$ court cases,and jailed , for " mischief" Finally found not guilty.Stand Up Canadians!!!
..and they take away your time .
People need to sue more
And the cops have no repercussion in the courts if they loose their case against you, even if you win a settlement. "Qualified immunity" for police, prosecutors and judges MUST end.
Misunderstanding isn't the issue!
Intent to abuse is the issue!
I went to court for stunting in a Dauphin, MB courtroom. The cops "witness" was a Winnipegosis town drunk who was being released from an overnight stay in the drunk tank when he saw me on an atv (driving on two tires, not a wheelie alternating left side then right side with donuts in between.) and went back to the station to report me. When the officer first approached me and asked me my name I told him "Ben", he then asked me "Is that you're full name then". To which I replied "If I told a five year old my name was Ben they would know thats not my full name". He then asked me if I had my licence on me to which I informed him I was going to be going through mud and water and didn't want to loose or damage my wallet in those conditions. He then had an emergency call on his radio and told me he would come by my house later to talk to me. Later when he came to my house and asked me if I wanted a ticket for not having my license on me (off road) I told him "I would rather get a fine for assaulting an officer" he then asked me If i was threatening him and I said "no I would just rather that ticket at the moment". They tried the whole stunting gig but I self represented and the judge told the crown prosecutor to shut up at one point as the idiot had no idea what he was talking about and his witness (town drunk) showed up completely pickled and couldnt even rember the day in question and thought he was summoned for something he had done. In the end the judge agreed that I was driving the atv as intended (it was a non work solid axle recreation/play model) in a recreation area that was safe to do so and the charge was dismissed. However the loud mouth before me who told the judge that he was the only one not being paid to be there and it was his responsibility to fight any fine even if he had done something, did get his fine quadrupled for wasting the court and everyone's time.
I f'ing love this story.
What is stunting? It's the catch all when the police don't like you but can't find a law that otherwise applies to arrest you for. Basically the motor sports version of disorderly conduct or obstruction.
Never heard the term here in the US. Is this a Canadianism?
Mischief is the equivalent of
@@timkellyD2R Most states have a similar named law but it's limited to performing actual stunts or driving on a road for a bet or wager. Basically it would be limited to street racers, or as a side charge on the more serious dangerous driving crime if the dangerous driving was for performance rather than trying to get away. It's vastly more easy for an officer to get a ticket upheld for any number of nonsense like speeding, crossing a traffic line, not signaling, plate lights, tint, blocking traffic, following too close, not signaling early enough (sometime as much as 250 feet is the state law). While stunting in the US tends to be limited to being able to prove money was bet on a race.
In Canada due to the open wording of the text of the law (ignoring all the case law), it's common for police to throw in a stunting charge to get back at people they don't like or offended them during a traffic stop.
In the states, the cops use "disorderly conduct" as their catch all law to retaliate against people that don't bow down to them. Their motto is, "show me the man and I'll find a crime."
i need a foil hat or something. i think you stole my thoughts.
before i even thought them.
HOW?
This is interesting. When I was in my teens, in Calgary, my friend drove off in his car to go to 7 Eleven. I was on the sidewalk in front of my house waiting for him to come back, and when I saw his car approach I immediately gave him the finger, just as many friends do. He pulled over and parked the car, handed me a slurpee and we were laughing, but a cop had seen me give him the finger and chose to hassle me about it. He literally told me I could be fined for "stunting". All these years later I finally find out the truth. Thanks Ian!
You are a great lawyer. Thanks for your time and teaching us our rights🙏🏻
As a commercial driver (in the US) I've seen the bird many a time because people don't know that a 14 ton vehicle doesn't work the same way as a sedan. I've also gone through trainings about resisting road rage. This has all taught me: drive safe no matter what the people around you think, and just keep your finger below the dashboard, because it makes you feel better :P
Yes sir. It's better to curse with the windows up.
also a cdl driver, have always got a warm fuzzy feeling when some dummy is so mad they flip me the bird.
I always say ''The person behind you isn't in charge of if you get home safely.''
only 14? a nice RV weighs that much.
what do you actually drive? a bus?
not knocking you at all, it's an honest job and we need good people doing it.
just curious, a full on 18 wheeler is 40 tons, before being overloaded. and plenty of wide or heavy load permits in use everyday. i've driven 6 ton shop trucks out to service those 18 wheelers on the side of the road, and had a license to drive them too (don't think i even have 1,000 miles in anything 10 ton or heavier, driving ain't my thing).
but i gotta know, what is a 14 ton rig?
does it got jakes? driveline retarders?
how many axles with what kind of braking system?
@@ARockRaider when i had it, only used my class A as a mechanic. towed other trailers behind a normal pickup enough to claim 6 figures mileage.
does not matter if it's a 16' foot fishing boat behind a dually (a load that truck can ignore) or 40 tons of truck and cargo, car drivers NEVER understand. you need space, you aren't going zero to sixty in 2.8 seconds, and you aren't going from sixty to zero in 100 feet.
They said you'll get a ticket and a court date. That can still be true ... you don't have to be guilty to get a ticket.
Yes, they didn't say you'll be convicted. You'll just have an inconvenience to have to waste a day in the court. That will teach ya to control your emotions, eh.
Sure, but you're okay with the Police issuing frivolous tickets?
@@Cataclysm1 Not at all ok with it. The process becomes the punishment. There should be negative consequences for the police who do this.
@@mck24601 100%
@@mck24601the rcmp has their own charter and in it “officer retention must take priority” or something along those lines idk it’s been awhile since I read it. They can basically do whatever they want. Wasting the courts time and tax payer dollars everyday!
Great share Runkle!
Always something new to learn in this channel! Thanks Runkle! ☺️
Sounds like the Seinfeld episode The Caddy where Kramer sues a woman for walking down the street wearing only a bra and causing him to crash the vehicle.
That is certainly outside of the norm (for better or for worse), so it must be a valid case of stunting!
The police DO know that this charge of stunting will not succeed in court, but they don't care. Giving the police 'the finger' will very likely get you a ticket and a court date, but it will likely not result in a conviction. This a perfect example of police using the legal process as the punishment, especially for 'contempt of cop' issues. Police that do this are just demonstrating corruption that likely pervades theirdaily behaviour on and off the job. These are disgusting people.
I love getting advertisments on youtube about dis-information from the government as the government puts out dis-information.
The police don't understand your rights but it doesn't matter. The police understand they are not accountable. In Alberta, you cannot sue the police in small claims court (no lawyer required). You have to sue the police in the higher court (Court of King's Bench) which will be costly. Who wants to pay $1000's for a lawyer to fight a $500 ticket?
The Alberta small claims court lacks the authority to hear civil claims against peace officers; s 9.6 (2)(d) the Provincial Court Act, RSA 2000, c P- 31. (PCA), provides: the court lacks jurisdiction in a claim or counterclaim against a judge, justice of the peace or peace officer for anything done by that person while executing the duties of that office.
what is the canadian phrase for "pro se"?
don't need a lawyer. just take some time to put together a well researched script for your questions in the deposition process and they will settle.
Otto the watchdog, american 1A youtuber, got some fresh deposition videos circulating. probably seen some already, other channels are covering.
soloyaker/armed fisherman has pro se depositions where he owns them, others do too.
@@nonenone-ll7ln
Pro se is the same term in Canadian courts. There is another problem.
Look up...
_Why it's 'almost impossible' to successfully sue police in Edmonton_
One quote from the above story: “There’s so much more procedure in Court of Queen’s Bench that if you don’t have any money, it makes it almost impossible,” said defence lawyer Erika Norheim.
Sue them personally and not as an officer. They will get no union protection that way !
CONCISE! you are of a public speaker with skill I envy. Us in the US, appreciate.
It is not that the badge wearing tyrants don't "understand your rights", it IS that they have been 'trained' to view our rights as an impediment to them, that prevents them (law enforcement) from doing their job.
And, assuming, that Canadian law enforcement has accepted "training assistance" from the FBI, there is no reason to believe that the Federal Bureau of Incompetence, has made a point of emphasizing the hatred that law enforcement has for INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, and therefore, the necessity of continuing the expansion of law enforcement's long desired establishment of a all-controlling police state.
The passage of the American "Patriot Act" gave ALL levels of law enforcement a giant boost in this quest, and with the FBI and Homeland Security defining Christians, veterans, gun owners, and those who oppose stricter government interference with our daily life, as "domestic terrorists", it has been made clear that law enforcement has declared war on LIBERTY.
This was written in US Bankers Magazine, Aug. 25, 1924.
“Capital must protect itself in every possible manner by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages must be foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When, through a process of law, the common people lose their homes they will become more docile and more easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of government, applied by a central power of wealth under control of leading financiers.
This truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of Capital to govern the world. By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance.
Thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves what has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.”
Your right it's about global control of the ppl this will get way worse, till Christ returns because it's evident now that the common ppl can't stop this evil plan ever.
OK what the hell is stunting? I've never heard of this before and apparently neither has Google when I just asked what it was???
There is an equivalent charge in Canadian military law, which is used to prosecute any behaviour not specifically enumerated: "Conduct prejudicial to the maintenance of good order and discipline." Any petty thing that bothers an officer or MP but is not specifically proscribed will draw that charge.
During my time in service I was amazed by the agility with which that charge was applied to the most chickenshyte of things. Anyone who has served can likely tell how they saw that charge applied.
Great video, Ian. Thanks for the information.
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
To all cops: You want your respect back? THEN EARN OUR TRUST BACK! Properly educate yourselves. Make each officer personally liable. As long as you fear integrity and accountability, you are NOT the good guys!
they hire the uneducated cops on purpose. theyre easier to indoctronate
Law enforcement agencies actively avoid hiring people who are fully informed on your legal rights, because people who're informed usually have strong opinions on where they think the law is wrong, meaning if they're hired as law enforcement, they're more likely to selectively enforce based on those strong opinions rather than just doing what they're told. The agencies don't WANT educated officers.
this lawyer is just as much of a criminal as the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
As a cop, i think that RCMP detachment does not know what they are talking about. I fight that ticket tooth and nail as that is a bs ticket.
But it still costs you thousands and there’s no opportunity to recover that from yet another useless rcmp member
@@liveemt actually not really that big of a cost other than maybe missing a day of work. I've had other tickets (like speeding, another traffic safety act violation) tossed out when challenged in court.
The possible consequences of not challenging it can actually be a greater cost if it effects your driving record and insurance.
@roberttoews2775 missing a day of work could cost you your house today. Not a big deal though eh?😂😂😂
@@barley12girl over the top much? Common sensibilities would easily suggest that your nonsensical reply is an extreme example and not one that would apply to the majority.
@@liveemtthousands?? You literally go to traffic court and say your peace. Jesus, people think they’re getting locked up for a traffic ticket🤦🏻♂️
I remember an auditing channel that was taking a video of a police station in Calgary. He was filming on the sidewalk right beside the road. He was told to move on by officers even though he was on the sidewalk. Auditor refused politely and got ticketed for stunting.
Excellent video. Thanks Ian. - A fellow freedom and law lover from south of the border.
Absolutely interesting. And absolutely educational. It is far too easy for cops to abuse their authority with zero repercussions. This needs to change.
As an American, I'm fairly used to seeing corrupt & violent cops, but I was shocked to see the way the freedom convoy protesters were treated by Canadian police.
This was great. I'd like to see more videos on charter protected rights.
this lawyer is just as much of a criminal as the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
@@truthteller367 You feeling ok buddy?
In fairness, the Charter isn't worth the paper on which it's written because of the preamble to the Constitution and because the courts have deferred to the government in almost every instance. The last eight years have proven that beyond any doubt.
I love those responses from the SCC that are like " yes we find the charter has been violated but in this case we think it's reasonable" lol
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
You’re absolutely correct. That’s why we need to press Pierre and the Conservatives to trash this present document and rewrite a new one. One that really protects citizens rights and freedoms. Not one that has a caveat such as “Notwithstanding “
"Horn not working, watch for finger."
If you're going to enforce the law, you should also be required to know it. Of course nobody can reasonably be expected to know every single law, but maybe if you're unfamiliar don't go aggressively enforcing on areas you're not sure about.
Yet...nobody "knows the law". There are too many laws, some very specific, some vague, some overly broad, all you can do is know where to find the law. I had a professor in law school who opened his first class of the year asking eager young students "who knows the law?" Hands went up, he chose a subject, and asked what the speed limit was at an intersection several kilometres away. The student did not know, Really? It's the law. Or at least it's "a" law so...
Law enforcement agencies actively avoid hiring people who are fully informed on your legal rights, because people who're informed usually have strong opinions on where they think the law is wrong, meaning if they're hired as law enforcement, they're more likely to selectively enforce based on those strong opinions rather than just doing what they're told.
@@chrismccarthy1455 I would argue this is a prime example of why there must be less laws, or at least less laws that apply to individuals.
Runtime of 13:37... l33t
Right! 😊
Thanks Geralt of Rivia!
"the offence of causing a disturbance under the Criminal Code of Canada." Defined
It is a criminal offence to engage in conduct that “disturbs the peace and order” in or near a public place.
Conduct that disturbs the peace and good order may include: "Swearing or the use of insulting or obscene language;"
Wow! I can see so many ways that THAT could be used against people! Its as bad as "Conducting an investigation," "Interfering with a public servant performing their duties," "Suspicious person(s)," and "Disturbing the Peace." Too vague, broad and subjective. And some, not all, cops will find a way to make it worse, sadly.
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
Ill flip you the thumbs.. to many times the real message is lost in communication .....❤😂❤
The Cops are real fast to understand one's rights when one of their buddies is being charge with a crime
Thanks! I hope you are feeling better!
I got a stunting ticket once, the judge said there must be intent to distract other users for it to be stunting
In a textualist interpretation of c.c.361.1 ...
...Wait, didn't they also claim flashing lights to warn of police was 'stunting'? To try to get people to stop it.
Thanks for covering this
I hope you emailed that town and informed them that can't actually write up a ticket for that. Good video
I voted for you on the gundies. Most dapper. Push out your viewers to show there support for you and vote!
Thanks for this Mr Runkle.
We're here for your thoughts and knowledge. No 'polishing' necessary. Get Well Ian!❤
Thanks for this Ian. Great video
I beat a stunting charge in an Edmonton court room once, many years ago, Ian, I know you'll understand how good it feels to "Win". I had that feeling and it was great! haha, true story. 🙂
Ian is 100% my fav “Elf mage” lawyer. 💪
Awesome video. Thanks
Thx for the education
Great stuff. Thanks
Thanks man. Much appreciated
I live in Alberta. During lockdowns I googled the emails of the head of RCMP in Canada. I used strong language and was visited three times at home and once at work. At no point did I break the law. I know RCMP or police need to follow the laws but seeing a couple people outside with no one else around outside in winter on ice playing hockey get arrested...WTF. I kept sending emails never threatening or acting a fool but pulling up news stories asking "WTF are you **** idiots doing" I'm old enough to know RCMP/police in Canada are better than in most places but when they happily arrest 2-5 people outside in the middle of nowhere in winter because they shouldn't be on a skating rink...My respect for police & RCMP is coming back but gone are the days when I had complete respect for what they do. It's insane what people will do if you give them money. It's mutated. It's worse. Less choose to take it. But here we are still living. Where are the lockdowns? Where are police knocking down doors?...Ian has a chill channel with a mix of people on all sides who live in peace. Props to those who donated on the recent stream. I should choose to be silent but this struck a nerve. PEACE
Ian, keep up the great work!
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
Love you Runkle!
Great video!
Love this kind of video clarifying vague laws and citizens' rights!
Very good video concerning freedom of digital speech and gestural opinions.
So what if you're walking down the street and give a cop the bird? How can that be stunting? Or is that a different nebulous charge?
They might try Causing a Disturbance but they'd also be wrong.
I hope you feel better soon!
I have a video of a cop in Bracebridge Ontario threatening to charge someone with stunt driving for giving him the finger. I have personally been charged with dangerous driving and failing to comply with an order over a similar interaction with the same detachment..
Just wanted to note how perfectly your channel name is. My dad loved Rumple of the Bailey. 🙂
Worst press release ever
It goes back past Harper too. I remember bumper stickers that had a middle finger, with the text "tax this Brian".
About 15 years ago, I was walking down the street after locking my bike. I was wearing a day-glo safety vest and as I crossed the street, a car t-boned a pickup at low speed. The woman in the car told the guy in the truck that she looked at me (you don't see construction workers with safety vests wearing bike shorts, I suppose)...
Love to hear your expert views on the use of profanity.
I'm wondering if this stunting law is found in other countries. England, USA, Ireland, etc...
well, in Germany, because of great concern over road rage, any kind of insulting gesture, in a car, can cost, i think €1000, about. CAD1500... road rage, at 220 Km/h, can be a mighty dangerous thing!
I went for a summer walk, and in doing so, I saw a little statue that was placed near the end of someones driveway. From a distance, it looked like the little baby statue was giving me the bird. As I got closer, I then could see that the baby statue had its hand extended, and in the hand of the statue, was a bird. I broke out laughing.
We can’t have law punishing people for their mistakes when the law makes more mistakes than they do.
police: policy enforcement. its literally in the name
Listen to this guy at your own peril. He's hilarious !!!
Flip them off using your ring finger. Be sure that it is recorded to prove which finger is used. Have a lawyer on speed dial and have fun.
If using the middle finger is 'stunting' and prosecutable, making a similar gesture that can be easily mistaken for the former is just as much stunting.
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
This is an important watch for anyone
Just the rear window? My dad had a massive sign on top of his car that said on one side that he's not voting for [insert local politician] and on the other accusing a local newspaper of colluding with said politician. He'd drive it around like normal, getting both approval and disapproval from people. When the politician held a rally, he drove circles around the block. Even the newspaper had to write about it, though they only mentioned the voting part of the sign, not the one accusing said newspaper of collusion (shocking, I know).
For US viewers, see SCOTUS opinions in Cohen v California and Washington v Montgomery.
I got a ticket for exactly that in Lethbridge!! Back in ‘91
We really need more videos like this! There are tons of videos on UA-cam about what your rights are if you're pulled over or stopped on the street by police, but these are all related to American laws.
I would love to inform my kids and even myself and friends what our rights are but I'm really at a loss where to start. You seem like the right guy for the job, would love to see some more of this kind of content from you, pretty please? 😘
this lawyer is no better then the cops are because he will not tell people what PERSON means and until they do all lawyers that took the bar are criminals. You want to be someone to look up to then tell everyone what you know because I am. This is also my wifes channel because I am banned from all social media for knowing the truth such as what a PERSON IS and where the word PERSON came from meaning the LATIN word PERSONA. In Canada a person means you are a body corporate, syndicate, or a trust meaning you are a corporation and until all lawyers tell the truth they are no better then the rest of the scum tricking all of us.
Every detachment gets the finger from me since February of 22.
Twice I have been ticked for stunting by the road pirates, loud exhaust (she told me I have a hole in my muffler), and loud stereo.
To quote a favorite TV show from the 1990s: "This is Canada -- after all -- where it is important to be polite." But NOT mandated by law.
I have been out of law enforcement now for over 20 years. That said, when I was a cop, I served from the rank of patrolman to Chief of Police when I medically retired. Thing is, cops are taught not the law, but how to enforce the law. Sure when the legislature finishes for their in session, the State would send out a representative to inform us of all the changes in the law, bur at no time during our police training at the academy were we taught how the law itself worked. Sure we were taught general code stuff about traffic enforcement, accident investigation, criminal investigation but that was the basics. I had quite an awakening when I went to college after an accident took me off the line, there I studied to be a legal assistant, that was, in short a cram course in what lawyers do and how to research the law then prepare documents that are used in court. I found myself wishing I had that education before taking to the street in my squad car, things would have been so much easier and understandable. I can see that there is no way that we can send every officer to an additional 2 years to study the law, but I do believe that some of the courses we took should be taught to police officer candidates who also attended the college where I graduated with my degree as a Legal Assistant.
Thanks!
My now deceased buddy and I received stunting tickest in 89 for posting a sign about a radar trap. Ended up paying it though it seemed like an over reach being I wasn't driving.
They should make "flipping the bird" a "grinching" offense payable by a $20 donation. Lol
Yeah those piggies aren't going to issue a statement that they were wrong.
I like how you say political expression is among the most highly protected rights.
Thanks IAN
Excellent, informative video. I have watched several american videos involving first amendment rights and have wondered where we stand. please do more, and get well soon.
Retaliatory charges and bruised egos....👏
🌶
I gre up in leduc. It was always a joke about stunting tickets was such a vague ticket. Bylaw Bob was the poster child of the local rcmp for his lack there of the law.
stunting where i live is over $1000 fine and you lose your license for a year. My friend got charged for going 40kmph over the limit
Yet we all rely on them and assume they know and abide by the rules (or at least people used to).
Awesome thanks