People like this kausikan guy should not be allowed to air his racist and pro western nonsence and all of those from the Global South who make up the majority of the World’s population should ignore him.
This kausikan (means sheet stirrer in Chinese), does not have much insights. All he does is regurgitates points without going into details on why things are the way they are.
I.know many politician in Malaysia like that...They are like Ticks sucking bloxd but no idea how to raise funds to tje country...Keep on attacking Minister that geberating incpme to the country.
@@jonwijaya8539 you can ask him if he lives long enough in China, speak to Chinese people (officials and common people) in different provinces. This old toad has no idea what he is talking about. You can ask him questions how the party select its leaders in a complex system in CCP. I bet he hasn’t got a single clue.
Maybe it's because most of the Chinese are not able to use UA-cam due to it being blocked by the Great Fire Wall, and even the few that are able to use VPN or other methods to use UA-cam won't be able to understand your video due to language barrier, so statistically the odds of Chinese people getting angry with you is a lot lower simply because they are unable to watch your video one way or another.
Listen to him. His statement is full of “I think, I don’t think.”This guy has no data, to back up unsubstantiated ideas unlike Professor Kishore Mahbubani.
Obtuse argumentative logic, saying "I think" means no substance? "I think" is a thought that can be based on objective and factual analyses and corroborated with stats. DumS
First of all, "clickbait" is a tactic often used by clever individuals. If he were truly insignificant from China's perspective, the Chinese embassy wouldn't feel the need to issue statements against him. Additionally, search for his name in Global Times, you'll find more evidence there.
He talks bluntly, but sense? It's OK to be blunt, just a matter of style. But his views are definitely grounded on his assumptions that communism is bad, regardless of why China needs that at least in foreseeable future. What is he looking for in XJP's mediocrity? What is his expectation of XJP to be successful leader? XJP serves the Chinese, he lifted a huge portion of his population from poverty, albeit not by himself alone. XJP does not service this self-centred arrogant clown.
We have a name for such rubbish remember It belongs to this tribe in Singapore which, by virtue of their knowledge of English language looked down on the rest of singaporeans .. But theie place and value in Singapore has plummeted greatly. ..they think they are whi te@@ahsunhon6402
This is UA-cam so pro-China comments are welcome to rant as much as they want, Its not Weibio in China with censorship. Just don't be racist and take the low road by insulting his name. Get used to hearing what you may not like. Singapore's Minister of Defence Dr. Eng is also a fresh breeze of air in ASEAN which needs to balance itself being at the vortex.
@@Goye41 Brainwashed China-can-do-no-wrong Singaporeans like you are laughable and obtuse 🤣🤣🤣 ALL foreign policy and diplomatic successes that Singapore have been enjoying are contributed to by Bilahari, who was perm sec of MFA for years. Rolling on the floor laughing
Whatever makes China uncomfortable is labeled anti-China. I fully support Bilahari Kausikan and Taiwan. In fact, I always affirm that Taiwan is an independent country. To the communists: stay out of Singapore.
You may regard any area as a country, a community, a township, etc.. but legally no one recognizes it. Taiwan was expelled from the UN and replaced by the PRC, which is the sole legal government of China, and it has full diplomatic relations with more than 190 countries, including your country, which also recognizes PRC as the so legal government of China and Taiwan is part of China.
@@donm-v5s While it is true that the People's Republic of China (PRC) is recognized by the United Nations and most countries as the official representative of "China," the status of Taiwan is by no means determined by the PRC or the UN especially the government of China is not legally elected. Furthermore, the expulsion of Taiwan from the UN involved corruption. Any action that involves corruption is not legal. Legally speaking, based on history, the de facto government of China is the KMT that now reside in Taiwan. That implies, on the contrary, China is part of Taiwan. Recognition of the PRC as the government of China does not necessarily mean that all countries accept the PRC's claim over Taiwan. Taiwan operates as a self-governing entity with its own government, military, currency, and legal system. Despite lacking widespread formal diplomatic recognition, Taiwan maintains robust economic, cultural, and unofficial diplomatic relations with many countries, including some of the world's largest economies. Taiwan's expulsion from the UN in 1971 (Resolution 2758) replaced its seat with the PRC as the representative of China, but the resolution did not explicitly address Taiwan's sovereignty or its status as part of China. While countries maintain formal relations with the PRC, many adopt a "One China Policy" that is intentionally vague and does not explicitly recognize Taiwan as part of the PRC. For example, the United States acknowledges the PRC's position but does not accept it as a legal fact, maintaining strong informal ties with Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations Act. Under international principles, such as the UN Charter, the people of Taiwan have the right to determine their political future. The island's vibrant democracy reflects the will of its people to maintain a distinct identity separate from the PRC. The PRC chose to disregard the UNCLOS ruling. It has no right to talk about international law anymore.
In my view, no one is truly foolish. It's not about who is more intelligent or wiser, but about finding solutions to conflict rather than fueling it. We must strive to view global conflicts from a neutral, third perspective, even when they directly affect us.
@@tanteckleng3665 wiser but he doesn’t get invited to big global conferences with important business and political leaders and policy makers. He can only bluff young blur students. Hahah
People like this kausikan guy should not be allowed to air his racist and pro western nonsence and all of those from the Global South who make up the majority of the World’s population should ignore him.
This kausikan (means sheet stirrer in Chinese), does not have much insights. All he does is regurgitates points without going into details on why things are the way they are.
Kausikuan - Cantonese for shit stirring stick.
100% agree with you
I.know many politician in Malaysia like that...They are like Ticks sucking bloxd but no idea how to raise funds to tje country...Keep on attacking Minister that geberating incpme to the country.
Racist padded m6&cciiaa 😢😢😢puppets
@@jonwijaya8539 you can ask him if he lives long enough in China, speak to Chinese people (officials and common people) in different provinces. This old toad has no idea what he is talking about. You can ask him questions how the party select its leaders in a complex system in CCP. I bet he hasn’t got a single clue.
This guy is just mouthing the western propaganda n I won’t b surprised that he’s on their payroll 😂
The more I hear from Him.. The more nonsense I hear
This guy talks nonsense unlike the Professor...not factual and rather out of emotion...
A nonsense talker
His name in Cantonese is hilarious
Bila in malay is when. Hari in malay is day. Kausi in cantonese is play with shit. Kan .. will leave it to your imagination.
If you know he is an Indian Singaporean， you will understand why he is a China-hater.
Undiplomatic diplomat !
🤔So far, unlike Indian bhakts, no pro-Chinese is calling me "anti-China" for posting this. A stark difference. Amazing! 🤔
Maybe it's because most of the Chinese are not able to use UA-cam due to it being blocked by the Great Fire Wall, and even the few that are able to use VPN or other methods to use UA-cam won't be able to understand your video due to language barrier, so statistically the odds of Chinese people getting angry with you is a lot lower simply because they are unable to watch your video one way or another.
Thanks for posting sir
Listen to him. His statement is full of “I think, I don’t think.”This guy has no data, to back up unsubstantiated ideas unlike Professor Kishore Mahbubani.
Obtuse argumentative logic, saying "I think" means no substance? "I think" is a thought that can be based on objective and factual analyses and corroborated with stats. DumS
Spore doesn’t need a Jimmy Lai
He is just a nonsense guy... Big mouth but nothing Much!
It's also called "ALL Mouth and NO TROUSERS"!
No one in Singapore will mention this man Kausikan. An empty vessel trying to be like Mr Kishore Mahbubani in the international arena of politics
Your English tells me you’re not Singaporean🤣 stop it China online troll army😂 a lot of Singaporeans actually know him and more will, too bad🤭🤭😘
(Bilahari Kausikan) - (A - Former) - (Permanent - Secretary) - (Unfortunately) - is - (A - Very) - (Un - Polished) - (Former) - (Political) - (Appointment - Holder) - 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 - with - (Lack) - of - (Decorum) - 🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️ - (Grace) - 🔸️🔸️🔸️🔸️🔸️ - (Style) - 🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️ - of - (A - Statesman) - 🖐🖐🖐🖐🖐 - I - Guess - (That's) - (The - Reason) - (He) - (Did - Not) - (Go) - (Very - Far) - in - (Polity) - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - If - (He) - Had - Run - For - (A - Political) - (Seat) - (He) - (Would - Not) - (Have - Gone) - (Very - Far) - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - As - (Obviously) - (He) - is - (Not) - (A - People) - (Person) - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - & - (Behaved) - (More) - Like - (A - Dictator) - (Craving) - For - (Control) - That - (He) - (Accused) - (The - President) - of - (China) - 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 - was - (Engaging - In) - 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 - (His - Disposition) - is - (More - Attuned) - To - (A - Ruffian) - 🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️🔹️ - & - (A - Gangster) - 🔸️🔸️🔸️🔸️🔸️ - Than - That - of - (A - Former) - (Permanent - Secretary) - 🖐🖐🖐🖐🖐 - (What) - (A - Pity) - 😁😁😁😁😁 - (Very - Pathetic) - 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 - (His) - (4 - Years) - 🗓 🗓 🗓 🗓 🗓 - At - (Columbia University) - Had - (Clearly) - (Brain - Washed) - (Him) - 🖐🖐🖐🖐🖐 - & - (Not - Able) - To See - (Beyond) - (The - Surface) - ❌️❌️❌️❌️❌️ - (Very - Shallow) - in - (Outlook) - ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ ✅️ -
Small dot island country, don't hear too serious, not the same level with Lee K Y
Good points!👏👏👏
This guy is a mediocre among Singaporeans.
He even seems to know what kind of weapons US will supply to Taiwan!
No point！ Keep talk talk talk！
Respect to this gentleman, he says the truth.
bull
Don’t say something stupid and bring harm to Spore!
.."..amazing words smith skills, to try to make self appear smarter than he really is,..",..is my impression of thie Chindian Academic
Please dun flatter him by thinking that China hates...who is he in China peespective .. Goodness ..click bait ?
First of all, "clickbait" is a tactic often used by clever individuals. If he were truly insignificant from China's perspective, the Chinese embassy wouldn't feel the need to issue statements against him. Additionally, search for his name in Global Times, you'll find more evidence there.
This man talks sense very bluntly. Great
He talks bluntly, but sense? It's OK to be blunt, just a matter of style. But his views are definitely grounded on his assumptions that communism is bad, regardless of why China needs that at least in foreseeable future. What is he looking for in XJP's mediocrity? What is his expectation of XJP to be successful leader? XJP serves the Chinese, he lifted a huge portion of his population from poverty, albeit not by himself alone. XJP does not service this self-centred arrogant clown.
We have a name for such rubbish remember
It belongs to this tribe in Singapore which, by virtue of their knowledge of English language looked down on the rest of singaporeans .. But theie place and value in Singapore has plummeted greatly. ..they think they are whi te@@ahsunhon6402
Why LKY read his report and went direct to him. Why Sg Gov booted Kismore from LKYSPP.
You are a PROXY yourself
All debts in china is humongous, household as well as local government. The only thing that rose is humongous debts.
Why going to Taiwan in quick succession •••
Singapore recognizes Taiwan as an independent country.
Really 😂
@@riseofchina ofc
Sure bo. Lawrence said no no le
@@pohkhui He does not represent me nor others.
Don't talk nonsense!
This is UA-cam so pro-China comments are welcome to rant as much as they want, Its not Weibio in China with censorship. Just don't be racist and take the low road by insulting his name.
Get used to hearing what you may not like. Singapore's Minister of Defence Dr. Eng is also a fresh breeze of air in ASEAN which needs to balance itself being at the vortex.
This is not true. UA-cam has deleted most of my comments because l have been shadow banned and blacklisted.
We Singaporeans love him❤❤❤💪🇸🇬💪🇸🇬💪🇸🇬💪🇸🇬
Please DON'T speak for me or every Singaporeans . . . !
He's not in the same class as Professors Kishore Mahbubani or Tommy Koh!
Of course Singaporeans love him because Singapore is purely pro-Western. Its economy is highly dependent on Western investment to survive.
@@Goye41 Brainwashed China-can-do-no-wrong Singaporeans like you are laughable and obtuse 🤣🤣🤣 ALL foreign policy and diplomatic successes that Singapore have been enjoying are contributed to by Bilahari, who was perm sec of MFA for years. Rolling on the floor laughing
Arrogant
Whatever makes China uncomfortable is labeled anti-China. I fully support Bilahari Kausikan and Taiwan. In fact, I always affirm that Taiwan is an independent country. To the communists: stay out of Singapore.
Good because l don’t ever want to visit Singapore.
You may regard any area as a country, a community, a township, etc.. but legally no one recognizes it. Taiwan was expelled from the UN and replaced by the PRC, which is the sole legal government of China, and it has full diplomatic relations with more than 190 countries, including your country, which also recognizes PRC as the so legal government of China and Taiwan is part of China.
@@donm-v5s While it is true that the People's Republic of China (PRC) is recognized by the United Nations and most countries as the official representative of "China," the status of Taiwan is by no means determined by the PRC or the UN especially the government of China is not legally elected. Furthermore, the expulsion of Taiwan from the UN involved corruption. Any action that involves corruption is not legal. Legally speaking, based on history, the de facto government of China is the KMT that now reside in Taiwan. That implies, on the contrary, China is part of Taiwan. Recognition of the PRC as the government of China does not necessarily mean that all countries accept the PRC's claim over Taiwan.
Taiwan operates as a self-governing entity with its own government, military, currency, and legal system. Despite lacking widespread formal diplomatic recognition, Taiwan maintains robust economic, cultural, and unofficial diplomatic relations with many countries, including some of the world's largest economies.
Taiwan's expulsion from the UN in 1971 (Resolution 2758) replaced its seat with the PRC as the representative of China, but the resolution did not explicitly address Taiwan's sovereignty or its status as part of China.
While countries maintain formal relations with the PRC, many adopt a "One China Policy" that is intentionally vague and does not explicitly recognize Taiwan as part of the PRC. For example, the United States acknowledges the PRC's position but does not accept it as a legal fact, maintaining strong informal ties with Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations Act.
Under international principles, such as the UN Charter, the people of Taiwan have the right to determine their political future. The island's vibrant democracy reflects the will of its people to maintain a distinct identity separate from the PRC.
The PRC chose to disregard the UNCLOS ruling. It has no right to talk about international law anymore.
He may be a Spore citizen, but really he is brown outside, white in side.
And he is no economist. I hope he is not a product of NUS!
Bilahari is much wiser than Kishore and George Yeo.
In my view, no one is truly foolish. It's not about who is more intelligent or wiser, but about finding solutions to conflict rather than fueling it. We must strive to view global conflicts from a neutral, third perspective, even when they directly affect us.
He is a total idiot
Really? Is your assessment objective?
@@tanteckleng3665 wiser but he doesn’t get invited to big global conferences with important business and political leaders and policy makers. He can only bluff young blur students. Hahah