How quickly they turn into bullies!! If 3 members of the public surrounded them in such a way it would cause a major problem. No consideration of such things as this behaviour is endemic
Why does the Jobcentre exist if when you enter all they tell you is “Do it online” or “the information is online” and they won’t let you film even a poster? Fantastic job, as usual, PTTP. Many thanks.
Many people must attend a Job Centre in person. I have never seen so many members of security in one job centre. This is evidence that one must have strong verbal communication skills if one is dealing with members of the public. It is also proof that having so many members of security interacting with one person can be detrimental. It aggravated the situation, not diffused it.
Because they sanction you for being 1 minute late for up to 6 months money, they have targets to sanction people a whistleblower spilled the beans on channel 4 news its on youtube, i think jobcentres will be scrapped soon though and the doylums who work their will have a hard time to get a job in the real world.
All these bootlicker scabs don't realize the government wants rid of them completely, which is why they're made to fuck over benefits claimants in any way they can. Idiots are working themselves out of employment.
These people have the absolute power to ruin people's lives by stopping their benefits on a whim. It is therefore incomprehensible to them that you don't do whatever they say.
Very true indeed. I've literally had them lie about me to get me a sanction. When I went back in I kicked off and they all shit themselves! I was there to rip one man's head off but the man wasn't there, luckily for him. Not bothered about the consequences as you can probably tell.
These aggressive guards is actually worse when gathered in a group, as it triggers this jungle law mentality whereas feelings will protrude as violence. What would happen without this manager, however poor job he to did? It’s beyond comprehensive how many can «work» doing absolutely nothing, and tragic comic in a place like this where people go to find real work.
@@janabbott3028 “Jungle law” is a term used in African countries. It starts with an instigator pointing the finger on someone for some “legit” reason , then the crowd eggs each other up and get violent against their prey. Typically they force tires around their victim, adds gasoline and set the victim on fire. Surely there are other solutions of jungle law, like stoning, kicking and stabbing - it’s a well known problem, and the police in those countries are safer walking away.
@@janabbott3028 Wikipedia names it “Jungle justice” and pinpoints Nigeria and Cameroon, but it happens all over Africa including Madagascar where tourists have been victims. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_justice
In a publicly funded office which assists people acquiring a job (allegedly) should a member of staff be asking PTTP in that tone if he is employed or claiming benefits? The most disgusting thing of all is how obvious it is that these services are simply not fit for purpose
@@robertmarkwell1993 Do you think that person was asking out of concern? The tone and attitude of these people is simply despicable. Surrounding members of the public and infringing their civil rights is not being concerned - its being a complete waste of public money. PTTP should wait outside ANY unemployment office in London and ask people coming out how they would rate the service.
@@robertmarkwell1993 I think public services should be fit for purpose. Whomsoever exposes wasted public money or criminal activity should be commended whatever their position in life. People who are an obstacle to such exposure may have something to hide.
What an awful place, with hostile unwelcoming staff. Appalling behaviour from these people in this Job Centre. A joke of a manager, staff who think they can axe (ask) if you are employed, on benefits, how you spend your days, have you not got better things to do and thrusting a hand/then newspaper in front of you and a motley crew of 'security' who don't follow the law by not wearing their badges required by law. Yet the public it appears have no rights and sadly some have to go to these buildings and do wonder if you didn't have a computer,phone or had a condition/syndrome/learning need/disability by which filming or taking pictures was the only way to access information? IMO is that not a potential barrier or discrimination?
SIA DON'T EMPLOY THEM. THEY PROVIDE THEIR LICENCE ONLY. THE DUMBEST PERSON IN THE WORLD CAN GET AN SIA LICENCE? THEN SECURITY COMPANIES EMPLOY THEM. IN THIS CASE IT'S G4S.
@@deathisdeadhaha the S.I.A are responsible for the issue of license to people who don’t know what the Job is and certainly what area they can control Yes they are not the employers just the control body
The majority of those security guards who couldn’t secure their trousers to their batty were at one time unemployed and have been sent to the course by the unemployment office - if you ask people in London they would think that’s the only thing the unemployment office offer.
So assault, threatening with violence. They didn't have the right to remove or trespassed you from a public place. So I trust you take action against these clowns. This place needs a mass audit.
@@RedCraig Again, a job canter is public and you cannot be trespassed unless you break the law in some way. Just watch his last video he did in a job center.
@@RedCraig Well, that's incorrect. Watch the **8 video, it's on paper. People cannot be removed from a public place unless they break the law in some way or create a disturbance and filming is not a disturbance, period.
A standard run in with the Job Centre security tribe, ready to show how it's done back home in the mud hut village. One of them even got a job behind a counter. Lucky you were not speared or sacrified for your efforts.
i think they should keep refering to people who are using government services as "customers" .. instead of the technically correct and more accurate term of CLIENT.. which in language suggests a duty of care from the provider to the CLIENT .. language is VERY important and also VERY telling of how people are treated..
@No Commentz The comment above is talking about technical language. “Employer” means the person who employed you. Employee and employer are both signatories to the same contract. Taxpayers are not the “employers” of public servants. As a tax payer you cannot be held accountable for any mistreatment or discrimination that employee might meet. That’s the difference. It’s juvenile to respond to a comment which opens up a debate about the correct terminology of consumers of public services with such an silly abstraction as “tax payers are the employers of all public servants”. Especially one which opens with something as definitive as a single sentence: “wrong”. He’s the opposite of wrong. He’s right and you’re wrong - definitionally wrong.
@No Commentz looks like you totally missed the point of my comment .. it was specifically regarding the use of the word CUSTOMER with regard to people who are in contact with mandatory JOB NETWORKS associated specifically with the provision of social services.. such as an unemployment payment.. they are in NO WAY A "Customer" of the JOB NETWORK .. nor are they a CUSTOMER of the government.. With regard to the JOB NETWORK a person in receipt of social services ADMINISTERED by the government THROUGH the job network .. are CLIENTS of said job network .. they are not CUSTOMERS of anything..
@@sensemusicofficial It's managment consultant nonsense language imported into public services since the 90s. The idea was that public sector needs more market incentives because markets are more efficient, so they decided to make public sector staff think like private sector staff by calling everyone a customer wanting good service and products instead of a client which is too difficult for these morons to understand.
I was in a so called job centre some years ago, while I was waiting a woman talking to staff was required to give medical information I couldn't help but overhear every word of it.
DWP sent me a huge envelope with some poor woman's medical history, face to face results and all her personal details. I called their complaints department who sent me a couple of return envelopes and a letter telling me they would take legal action against ME if I didn't send the documents back! I questioned the fact that she may have been sent my documents and they just put the wrong covering address page to each envelope. Totally incompetent. Took me 3 years with no benefits to get them to court where I won my case, but in that time I lost my house, so I have no time for them now. Sorry, I digressed slightly then.😂
Been working for 43 years. About 3 years ago, i used a Job Centre for the first time in my life and had no idea of the protocols. I actually put a suit on for my appointment, something upon arrival and seeing the other people there realised was a waste of time. And never in my life have i met a more colder human being than my interviewer. He didn't even look at me in the eye. I just stood up and left. Horrible place.
@@tilerman You do get the odd empathetic and pleasant "advisor" here and there, but they truly are very few and far between. I've had the occasional one that never really checked my work search and just asked me word of mouth what I've done and she took it as the truth whilst having a laugh in between.. Never kept me for longer than five minutes usually and I left with a smile. But totally agree, I've also had those that you just want to tell to stick it.
@@JynxedKoma On my visit there were people drinking, smoking drugs, a truly grubby place with, how can i put it, some rough characters. I guess the advisors have to deal with some tricky 'customers', but i wasn't one of them, i was there because i was genuinely in need of help. First impression. Not good at all.
Brilliant work by PTTP, respecting the right to film and not getting irate, unlike the people at the Jobcentre who seemed like a very unfriendly bunch.
11:48 And here we have a mother with a child who is a sheeple and follows the fake authority of the JobCentre staff. She won't stand up to them because she's scared of what they will do to her if she sides with PttP. But she also is one of the sheeple who thinks that someone who can see her personal information has a moral obligation to not pass it on, not realising that the legal obligation in keeping it private rests with the JobCentre. So the JobCentre is the one with no morals.
If the woman was so upset about it she'd find that she can't sue PttP when it was the failure of the JobCentre to keep her private info private. She'd be better off suing the JobCentre for their failures. And she'd get more money from them too.
A person must not pursue a course of conduct- by which he intends to persuade any person- not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or to do something that he is not under any obligation to do They are in breach of this themselfs
The man was attacked by the guard. The man holding the news paper has showed himself up. Anyone can walk in there with a camera in there pocket and record everything on the computer screens covertly. The police told the job centre to jog on when they called.
No, just another misinformed sheep, who doesn't know or value her GOD-given RIGHT to be a LIONESS! This is what audits (@ their best) are all about. If you don't know your rights; you can not receive nor be protected by your rights. 🪞
Thank you for your courage to bring this footage into the light and still walk around these animals that say that they are here to help and protect people but not.
8:15 The guy understands that PttP has done his homework and is therefore very knowledgeable about what he can lawfully do. Yet he carries on as if his authority trumps the law.
7:00 And the woman shows her lack of intelligence. The manager has started to understand that lack of engagement might work, but she has to stick her oar in and say that PttP can't record a sign - whilst he's recording it. Does she think her statement will automagically remove the footage of the sign from the video?
Man I love this dude, calm cool collective, and he knows his shit, doesn't play dumb treats people how they treat him! Well done bro, let me just say I have watched some serious amount of hours of audits from the UK 🇬🇧 and the US 🇺🇸, stumbled across this channel last night and am declaring this my new favourite channel. Keep up the good work bro. Wish you all the best.
I am glad to see that that other incident at the other job centre hasn't put you off Could we please have an update on that incident because the last time I heard the police said no further action
The guy putting the newspaper over the camera lens is a disgrace when he suggested that PTTP was deliberately filming the “little girl” as he specifically called her. The lowest of the low to suggest what he was obviously suggesting. My God who has the whip hand in this country now?
I started working in 1970 41 years later Unfortunately I had to use one of these shit holes that was 2012/13. The privacy back then was none existent, and as for being a customer that is bollocks you were a number. And you were seen by a (job coach) who really didn't give a shit about you . So keep exposing these tossers, maybe the rest of the Auditors could show up and give support.
Why? It was funny, but it looks kind of petty. Look at the comments here. Imagine if somebody called out all the mistakes people make - how would such a person come across?
@Rob Croley What's "regular English"? You've just argued that there is no such thing as regular English because it's changing all the time. How about this - if, in the opinion of experts in that language, the current correct pronunciation is "ask", then that's what it is. Doesn't matter what people 50, 100, 1000, or 10000 years ago thought, and it doesn't matter what people in 50 or 100 or 1000 years think. In our country at this time, the correct pronunciation IS ask. And don't tell me these afro-carribeans who popularised arks for ask are all doing it because their parents read Chaucer to them when they were growing up.
@Rob Croley Nice one. I look at the etymology of words regularly. Some of them have fascinating origins and wholly different meanings. I wouldn't have thought to do ask. Thanks.
@@OncleM Why is it such a big deal though? I mean are we going to tour the north of England to correct their pronunciation, or tell a random scot in London that they can't even speak English properly? Seems a bit petty, no?
How much is the taxpayer paying for these g4s donuts?….they outnumber the “customers” at any given time surely there’s some savings to be there on a national level?
@@bournagin4439 I'm refering to the way he will place himself between the aggressor and his camera and his camera is above his head and capturing the advancements of the bully. I find it puts thing in a better prospective. But different styles of auditing
He’s of the impression that not displaying an SIA Badge is an offence that has a possible 9 month prison sentence, yet is condoning the fact that they are not wearing them 🤷♂️
"Bye Mark, Miss you already. Hugs and Kisses!" 🤣🤣🤣 OMFG, That was the cherry on top of the icing on the cake for me. I spat my bloody tea over my computer; I'll tap you for a new one, hahahahaha J/k. The 🔔 End holding the paper up was so childish that he belongs in daycare, not a job centre. If he cannot handle you recording a few posters in a publicly funded place without throwing a tantrum, then maybe he is better off working on a remote island or somewhere else away from the above-ground and cameras, so sewers, maybe? 🤷🤔🤣🤣. A great set of VLogs. Well done again, PTTP! X
Thanks Peppa! Sorry about your computer 🙈😂 I know he was honestly so ridiculous so I just decided to make a joke out of it asking him to turn the pages for me 😂 none of them should be working there really should they haha x
@@powertotheproletariat Totally. To attack you like that was nothing short of criminal. He deserves to be sacked, at the very least. They were all unprofessional and lacked knowledge of our fundamental rights to film in public. For the trolls who don't like this, you are clearly either one of the W anchors who works there, or should I say WORKED, or you are a deluded 🐽
Hi Just to give you the heads up. As a security guard myself, it’s policy that no G4S guard or any guard for that matter is not allow to physically remove. It’s under SIA rules, and G4S state to all their guards they are not allowed to physically touch anyone, if someone refuses to leave then police is called to remove if necessary. Even with trespassing law they cannot physically touch you. The manager in this case is wrong as he should also know that guards can not touch anyone. It’s assault that’s why G4S forbid it. Just for your information.
Check the g4S policy if you don’t believe me. Reasonable force is correct but only when you are attacked first. Trust me I know I work as a security guard.
All those public employees need to be fired for complete incompetence, the disdain they have for the public is disgraceful, all as dumb as bag of hammers
Wow! No wonder the country is in a state when you have all these fools trying to sort out a simple problem. Every single one of them needs to be educated. Well done again to DJ
If the person @14.20 wants to make assumptions and accusations about YOU then we should do the same. I believe the only reason he works here is to get the names and addresses of single mothers with young female children for his later personal gratification. Isn’t that how accusations work😈.
Wow. That was honestly extremely difficult to watch. The absolute level of ignorance and intelligence. Claims to be trying to protect public information whilst having the public's information on public display despite being told it can clearly be seen by anyone looking. The guy in the white shirt was just totally beyond any logic comprehension with an array of pressumptions that he'd decided and was to ignorant to listen or understand whilst trying to prove how good an employee he is to his boss. I hope you pass all your findings to the highest level possible based on their treatment of a member of public acting lawfully, their attempt to stir up & instigate other members of public against you, their condescending & rude manner, failure to wear their SIA badges, their failure to kept the public's information private & confidential, their failure to alert the public of their right to private conversations in private rooms, their assault on you and hopefully once this is seen they be returning to the job centre as job seekers after their fired for such a poor performance in the fiduciary duties. I am a little disappointed that you didn't let them remove you, as that would've not been reasonable with no grounds for removing you from a public space we pay for and a bit gutted you didn't wait for the police to come educate them about the right to film in any public place.
Have you seen the first video? It is difficult to watch on so many levels. If one is dealing with the public, then one needs to have excellent communication skills. De-escalation skills didn't appear to be used at all. One os not going to have good results if several members of security surround a person. The behaviour was not the best. They might not have completed understood what he was doing. At the same time, they need to liaise a bit better with members of the public.
That clown in the white shirt needs to be nowhere near the public, he's an absolute danger to every single member of the public that come in contact with him. That manager couldn't manage his finger up his arse. Worst behaviour I have ever seen from public servants. If that clown of a manager is still in a job next week after his actions here I'll be shocked.
They we're no doubt told by the police that he was allowed to be there and do what he was doing, yet they continue to behave like this. Guy holding paper should be fired from what ever job he is meant to be doing.
I don’t understand what your purpose is. You allowed yourself to be attacked by security guards. You witness crimes and violations of GDPR. You walk out with nothing except a video. You can’t deny your purpose is only to film confrontations if that is all you do You should have called the police the moment you were assaulted. You can’t call this journalism until you have returned and show us that the screens are not protected and the guards are wearing their badges.
to expect screen protectors after on visit, and see no visible govt change of policy, does not mean a start has not been made; [if all customers took their phones in staff would soon look the other way.... or else close the centres all over the UK to be re-designed!] How many times have BBC Watchdog or Panorama seen no change in rogue biz, Govt depts, etc, after many many confrontations - it's the norm to carry on as before; those holding power hate truth and change; thus losing/questioning their power/status - it hits their smug pride; we see that in govt daily
Vulnerable customers watching a man harassed and attacked by security guards for just filming isn’t disturbing? Stupid petty and causing a disturbance. These officials are breaching peoples privacy every day but make a nonsense of someone with a camera. Passive aggressive woman who attacks someone’s rights and acts as if she is holier than everyone else. What a shambles of a government
How quickly they turn into bullies!! If 3 members of the public surrounded them in such a way it would cause a major problem. No consideration of such things as this behaviour is endemic
Why does the Jobcentre exist if when you enter all they tell you is “Do it online” or “the information is online” and they won’t let you film even a poster? Fantastic job, as usual, PTTP. Many thanks.
Many people must attend a Job Centre in person. I have never seen so many members of security in one job centre. This is evidence that one must have strong verbal communication skills if one is dealing with members of the public. It is also proof that having so many members of security interacting with one person can be detrimental. It aggravated the situation, not diffused it.
Because they sanction you for being 1 minute late for up to 6 months money, they have targets to sanction people a whistleblower spilled the beans on channel 4 news its on youtube, i think jobcentres will be scrapped soon though and the doylums who work their will have a hard time to get a job in the real world.
“Customers” ? What are they buying?
All these bootlicker scabs don't realize the government wants rid of them completely, which is why they're made to fuck over benefits claimants in any way they can. Idiots are working themselves out of employment.
Good point!!
These people have the absolute power to ruin people's lives by stopping their benefits on a whim. It is therefore incomprehensible to them that you don't do whatever they say.
Very true
Very true indeed. I've literally had them lie about me to get me a sanction. When I went back in I kicked off and they all shit themselves! I was there to rip one man's head off but the man wasn't there, luckily for him. Not bothered about the consequences as you can probably tell.
Yeah Welfare always try that shit anywhere you are in the world. government
And most don't.
This man is a total disgrace everybody should pay this job centre a visit💯
Oooh another mass audit Gimp
Yeah every unemployed bum should head down with their camera phones
Probably they all do to claim their doles. 😆
@@Fartman3000 have you elected your self as leader
@@Fartman3000 weird guy
These aggressive guards is actually worse when gathered in a group, as it triggers this jungle law mentality whereas feelings will protrude as violence. What would happen without this manager, however poor job he to did?
It’s beyond comprehensive how many can «work» doing absolutely nothing, and tragic comic in a place like this where people go to find real work.
@@janabbott3028 “Jungle law” is a term used in African countries. It starts with an instigator pointing the finger on someone for some “legit” reason , then the crowd eggs each other up and get violent against their prey. Typically they force tires around their victim, adds gasoline and set the victim on fire. Surely there are other solutions of jungle law, like stoning, kicking and stabbing - it’s a well known problem, and the police in those countries are safer walking away.
@@janabbott3028 Wikipedia names it “Jungle justice” and pinpoints Nigeria and Cameroon, but it happens all over Africa including Madagascar where tourists have been victims.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_justice
Jungle law... Bro 🤣
Jungle law most definitely displayed at its best 👌 as cesar said in rise of the planet of the apes.
In a publicly funded office which assists people acquiring a job (allegedly) should a member of staff be asking PTTP in that tone if he is employed or claiming benefits? The most disgusting thing of all is how obvious it is that these services are simply not fit for purpose
Because they are all a money making scam,just look how many G4stupids there are in every joke centre.
It is their job to ask that question to asses his suitability for a job or benefits. Doh!
@@robertmarkwell1993
Do you think that person was asking out of concern? The tone and attitude of these people is simply despicable. Surrounding members of the public and infringing their civil rights is not being concerned - its being a complete waste of public money. PTTP should wait outside ANY unemployment office in London and ask people coming out how they would rate the service.
@@froggydoggy8758 That would make an ideal job for PTTP as he has a lot of free time in his hands.
@@robertmarkwell1993
I think public services should be fit for purpose. Whomsoever exposes wasted public money or criminal activity should be commended whatever their position in life. People who are an obstacle to such exposure may have something to hide.
What an awful place, with hostile unwelcoming staff. Appalling behaviour from these people in this Job Centre. A joke of a manager, staff who think they can axe (ask) if you are employed, on benefits, how you spend your days, have you not got better things to do and thrusting a hand/then newspaper in front of you and a motley crew of 'security' who don't follow the law by not wearing their badges required by law. Yet the public it appears have no rights and sadly some have to go to these buildings and do wonder if you didn't have a computer,phone or had a condition/syndrome/learning need/disability by which filming or taking pictures was the only way to access information? IMO is that not a potential barrier or discrimination?
S.I.A. need to be seriously investigated regarding the people they are employing, absolutely shocking...
SIA DON'T EMPLOY THEM.
THEY PROVIDE THEIR LICENCE ONLY. THE DUMBEST PERSON IN THE WORLD CAN GET AN SIA LICENCE?
THEN SECURITY COMPANIES EMPLOY THEM.
IN THIS CASE IT'S G4S.
S.I.A are not employing them though they just issue the license they use
@@deathisdeadhaha the S.I.A are responsible for the issue of license to people who don’t know what the Job is and certainly what area they can control
Yes they are not the employers just the control body
The majority of those security guards who couldn’t secure their trousers to their batty were at one time unemployed and have been sent to the course by the unemployment office - if you ask people in London they would think that’s the only thing the unemployment office offer.
It amazes me that you gotta take a course to get the license and yet when they get it they haven’t got a bloody bean of what to do.
So assault, threatening with violence. They didn't have the right to remove or trespassed you from a public place. So I trust you take action against these clowns. This place needs a mass audit.
@@RedCraig Not from a public place. And a job center is a publice place.
@@RedCraig Again, a job canter is public and you cannot be trespassed unless you break the law in some way. Just watch his last video he did in a job center.
@@RedCraig OMFG, just watch his last video, he has it on paper that it is a public place and het can be there as long as he wants.
@@RedCraig Well, that's incorrect. Watch the **8 video, it's on paper. People cannot be removed from a public place unless they break the law in some way or create a disturbance and filming is not a disturbance, period.
@user-mu2bj7cf8h I don't think removing comments is lawful. It's a government entity, so the comments are public record.
A standard run in with the Job Centre security tribe, ready to show how it's done back home in the mud hut village.
One of them even got a job behind a counter.
Lucky you were not speared or sacrified for your efforts.
i think they should keep refering to people who are using government services as "customers" .. instead of the technically correct and more accurate term of CLIENT.. which in language suggests a duty of care from the provider to the CLIENT .. language is VERY important and also VERY telling of how people are treated..
@No Commentz The comment above is talking about technical language. “Employer” means the person who employed you. Employee and employer are both signatories to the same contract.
Taxpayers are not the “employers” of public servants. As a tax payer you cannot be held accountable for any mistreatment or discrimination that employee might meet. That’s the difference.
It’s juvenile to respond to a comment which opens up a debate about the correct terminology of consumers of public services with such an silly abstraction as “tax payers are the employers of all public servants”.
Especially one which opens with something as definitive as a single sentence: “wrong”. He’s the opposite of wrong. He’s right and you’re wrong - definitionally wrong.
I hate both terms.
@No Commentz looks like you totally missed the point of my comment .. it was specifically regarding the use of the word CUSTOMER with regard to people who are in contact with mandatory JOB NETWORKS associated specifically with the provision of social services.. such as an unemployment payment..
they are in NO WAY A "Customer" of the JOB NETWORK .. nor are they a CUSTOMER of the government..
With regard to the JOB NETWORK a person in receipt of social services ADMINISTERED by the government THROUGH the job network .. are CLIENTS of said job network .. they are not CUSTOMERS of anything..
✋👋✋👋
Just read his future 😂😅😁
@@sensemusicofficial It's managment consultant nonsense language imported into public services since the 90s.
The idea was that public sector needs more market incentives because markets are more efficient, so they decided to make public sector staff think like private sector staff by calling everyone a customer wanting good service and products instead of a client which is too difficult for these morons to understand.
I was in a so called job centre some years ago, while I was waiting a woman talking to staff was required to give medical information I couldn't help but overhear every word of it.
DWP sent me a huge envelope with some poor woman's medical history, face to face results and all her personal details. I called their complaints department who sent me a couple of return envelopes and a letter telling me they would take legal action against ME if I didn't send the documents back! I questioned the fact that she may have been sent my documents and they just put the wrong covering address page to each envelope. Totally incompetent. Took me 3 years with no benefits to get them to court where I won my case, but in that time I lost my house, so I have no time for them now. Sorry, I digressed slightly then.😂
The intensity of self-righteousness in defending their bullshit is astonishing.
My admiration for you knows no bounds. These people need to be shown what their responsibilities are and to be taken down a peg or three 🙏🇬🇧
You need to get out more then or stop using the substances you are taking.
@@romich4536 awesome. 👍👍
He won’t shag you
God help any one who has to go to this job centre for help.
Been working for 43 years. About 3 years ago, i used a Job Centre for the first time in my life and had no idea of the protocols. I actually put a suit on for my appointment, something upon arrival and seeing the other people there realised was a waste of time. And never in my life have i met a more colder human being than my interviewer. He didn't even look at me in the eye. I just stood up and left. Horrible place.
@@tilerman You do get the odd empathetic and pleasant "advisor" here and there, but they truly are very few and far between. I've had the occasional one that never really checked my work search and just asked me word of mouth what I've done and she took it as the truth whilst having a laugh in between.. Never kept me for longer than five minutes usually and I left with a smile. But totally agree, I've also had those that you just want to tell to stick it.
@@JynxedKoma On my visit there were people drinking, smoking drugs, a truly grubby place with, how can i put it, some rough characters. I guess the advisors have to deal with some tricky 'customers', but i wasn't one of them, i was there because i was genuinely in need of help. First impression. Not good at all.
I know Peter, the disgust in their voice when asking about my employment and they're expected to help the unemployed?!
The only help you will get from any job centre is called a sanction , they don't offer jobs just cohersive control and misery .
All these BLACKS with jobs we should have.
They should send Mystery Shoppers into Job Centres to assess their performance
Beer belly - overpaid - no idea of regulations - G4S - bully tactics - no idea of their regulations or authority - good video
Pregnant simon cowell
Brilliant work by PTTP, respecting the right to film and not getting irate, unlike the people at the Jobcentre who seemed like a very unfriendly bunch.
Definition of customer
1: one that purchases a commodity or service
Definition of client
1: one that is under the protection of another : DEPENDENT
I couldn't understand a word of most of the G4S staff AGAIN. If one of them put a finger on me i wouldn't be as professional as PTTP
This video is a pearl to all the racist people in United kingdom. The behaviour, the tone, the treats is totally unacceptable
11:48 And here we have a mother with a child who is a sheeple and follows the fake authority of the JobCentre staff. She won't stand up to them because she's scared of what they will do to her if she sides with PttP. But she also is one of the sheeple who thinks that someone who can see her personal information has a moral obligation to not pass it on, not realising that the legal obligation in keeping it private rests with the JobCentre. So the JobCentre is the one with no morals.
If the woman was so upset about it she'd find that she can't sue PttP when it was the failure of the JobCentre to keep her private info private. She'd be better off suing the JobCentre for their failures. And she'd get more money from them too.
Yep. That's two that are thicker than custard there.
No such word as sheeple…please stop messing with our language!
A person must not pursue a course of conduct-
by which he intends to persuade any person-
not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or
to do something that he is not under any obligation to do
They are in breach of this themselfs
The man was attacked by the guard. The man holding the news paper has showed himself up. Anyone can walk in there with a camera in there pocket and record everything on the computer screens covertly. The police told the job centre to jog on when they called.
That woman that started having a go at you for filming who didnt even work there is just pure Karen vibes
No, just another misinformed sheep, who doesn't know or value her GOD-given RIGHT to be a LIONESS!
This is what audits (@ their best) are all about. If you don't know your rights; you can not receive nor be protected by your rights. 🪞
Nearly 28,000 people have viewed this interaction at the time of my visit. A G4S Paradise for all who come here to apply for it.
When he corrected him “axed” 😂😂
Yes, but then again, he did continue to say “irrespective” isn’t a word,when it actually is.😂😅2:09
Power, you’re wasting your time, these two will never admit they are wrong, ignorance will out.
Thank you for your courage to bring this footage into the light and still walk around these animals that say that they are here to help and protect people but not.
Customers with health conditions, customers with addictions.... what is that, a health centre? What bullcrap.
Is this a job centre in Rwanda ?
Another racist in the comments
If only.
A job centre employs an entire battalion of completely unqualified 'security' dudes. What a joke..
Who's paying for all those security guards. Oh yes we are the taxpayer!
It's an office of assumptions and they have to realize not everyone is online because of the cost especially in these hard times
8:15 The guy understands that PttP has done his homework and is therefore very knowledgeable about what he can lawfully do. Yet he carries on as if his authority trumps the law.
Welcome to Her Majestys United Kingdom.
Why does that customer think we want to read his palm?
7:00 And the woman shows her lack of intelligence. The manager has started to understand that lack of engagement might work, but she has to stick her oar in and say that PttP can't record a sign - whilst he's recording it. Does she think her statement will automagically remove the footage of the sign from the video?
He's more like a hostage than a manager
Man I love this dude, calm cool collective, and he knows his shit, doesn't play dumb treats people how they treat him! Well done bro, let me just say I have watched some serious amount of hours of audits from the UK 🇬🇧 and the US 🇺🇸, stumbled across this channel last night and am declaring this my new favourite channel. Keep up the good work bro. Wish you all the best.
These security guards need arresting
When a jobcenter has more private security guards than staff then you know their purpose isnt to help people
💯
More bouncers than my local nightclub. They just kept coming out the woodwork 😅😂
Seriously bad management of Job centres should be rewarded by closing them down
Please ask your MP why G4S are allowed to control Job Centres
I am glad to see that
that other incident at the other job centre hasn't put you off
Could we please have an update on that incident because the last time
I heard the police said no further action
The guy putting the newspaper over the camera lens is a disgrace when he suggested that PTTP was deliberately filming the “little girl” as he specifically called her. The lowest of the low to suggest what he was obviously suggesting. My God who has the whip hand in this country now?
They would rather kill the messenger than address the message. When their lack of privacy protection is exposed, they lash out.
“I am the Captain now”
I started working in 1970 41 years later Unfortunately I had to use one of these shit holes that was 2012/13. The privacy back then was none existent, and as for being a customer that is bollocks you were a number. And you were seen by a (job coach) who really didn't give a shit about you . So keep exposing these tossers, maybe the rest of the Auditors could show up and give support.
So many G4S staff, why? Are there really that many public order offences in a job centre? Someone is making a lot of money from our taxes
I'm so glad you called him out on his pronunciation of ask.
I've yet to meet anyone from West Indies et al who can pronounce 'ask'. It's like asking an English person to pronounce 'loch' properly.
Why?
It was funny, but it looks kind of petty. Look at the comments here. Imagine if somebody called out all the mistakes people make - how would such a person come across?
@Rob Croley What's "regular English"?
You've just argued that there is no such thing as regular English because it's changing all the time.
How about this - if, in the opinion of experts in that language, the current correct pronunciation is "ask", then that's what it is. Doesn't matter what people 50, 100, 1000, or 10000 years ago thought, and it doesn't matter what people in 50 or 100 or 1000 years think. In our country at this time, the correct pronunciation IS ask.
And don't tell me these afro-carribeans who popularised arks for ask are all doing it because their parents read Chaucer to them when they were growing up.
@Rob Croley Nice one. I look at the etymology of words regularly. Some of them have fascinating origins and wholly different meanings. I wouldn't have thought to do ask. Thanks.
@@OncleM Why is it such a big deal though?
I mean are we going to tour the north of England to correct their pronunciation, or tell a random scot in London that they can't even speak English properly?
Seems a bit petty, no?
irrespective is most certainly a word in the English dictionary, kind of a racist attack on that guy.
I really wished he would’ve pushed past them at every opportunity, that newspaper tactic was Intrusive as hell
what a disgrace and embarrassing performance from the G4S staff, they have no idea of the law.
We seriously need an update on this!
I waited 45 mins for the police to come.
I hope you sued the scumbags!
What a ridiculous man. Waving a paper around.
2:40 - Journalist being prevented from walking around - is this kidnapping?
Are you stupid!!! You must be if you think this arrogant tosser is any kind of journalist
How much is the taxpayer paying for these g4s donuts?….they outnumber the “customers” at any given time surely there’s some savings to be there on a national level?
Imagine skipping this video to the part where there is a floating news paper talking to you 🤣
😂
8:04 🤣🤣🤣 they figure it out and STILL go along with the bit 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why does a job centre have 10 security jobsworths?
The old manager in the red sweater - HE IS COLOURING HIS HAIR 😀
Putting something in front of your camera is called Prior restraint and you have every right to remove it by force
I like the way bay area transparency deals with it.
@@dunningkruger4863 B.A.T. has the First Amendment to fall back on. We have corrupt Plod and woke Judges here.
@@bournagin4439
I'm refering to the way he will place himself between the aggressor and his camera and his camera is above his head and capturing the advancements of the bully.
I find it puts thing in a better prospective. But different styles of auditing
Legitimate visitors are made to feel uncomfortable and unwelcome in these places, why is that?
Watching your videos it is clear that UK job centers main purpose is to supply work for unskilled Nigerian migrants.
*"we don't have under cover customers"* - *THAT'S THE WHOLE FECKING POINT MASTERMIND
They won there. Well done job centre. Didnt need the police either.
Irrespective is a word though so that made you a little silly
Round 2 is needed at this job centre
He’s of the impression that not displaying an SIA Badge is an offence that has a possible 9 month prison sentence, yet is condoning the fact that they are not wearing them 🤷♂️
EGO POWER STRUGGLE TUG OF LAW... THEY LOSE..
This place needs well audited.
If you want to audit an unemployment office then you have started scrapping the bottom of the barrel in life.
@@robertmarkwell1993 *scraping
This is what happens when you give immigrants SIA badges.
Who is this man giving orders to another man .
Is this a public building ?
This is what they called diversity
Did that security guard have a license to advertise the daily express?
Probably not ....but maybe they do who knows...!!!
SHAMEFUL!
You must go do some audits in the Congo. I'm sure the relatives of these g4S goons there would be far less aggressive.
You think, do you.
"Bye Mark, Miss you already. Hugs and Kisses!" 🤣🤣🤣 OMFG, That was the cherry on top of the icing on the cake for me. I spat my bloody tea over my computer; I'll tap you for a new one, hahahahaha J/k.
The 🔔 End holding the paper up was so childish that he belongs in daycare, not a job centre. If he cannot handle you recording a few posters in a publicly funded place without throwing a tantrum, then maybe he is better off working on a remote island or somewhere else away from the above-ground and cameras, so sewers, maybe? 🤷🤔🤣🤣. A great set of VLogs. Well done again, PTTP! X
He belongs in an elocution class for sure.
Yes, for sure!
Thanks Peppa! Sorry about your computer 🙈😂 I know he was honestly so ridiculous so I just decided to make a joke out of it asking him to turn the pages for me 😂 none of them should be working there really should they haha x
If you think that's funny you need to get out more love 🤣
@@powertotheproletariat Totally. To attack you like that was nothing short of criminal. He deserves to be sacked, at the very least. They were all unprofessional and lacked knowledge of our fundamental rights to film in public. For the trolls who don't like this, you are clearly either one of the W anchors who works there, or should I say WORKED, or you are a deluded 🐽
Why do they have like 10 g4s goons anyway? That's a god damn waste of money before the terrible behaviour
Hi Just to give you the heads up. As a security guard myself, it’s policy that no G4S guard or any guard for that matter is not allow to physically remove. It’s under SIA rules, and G4S state to all their guards they are not allowed to physically touch anyone, if someone refuses to leave then police is called to remove if necessary. Even with trespassing law they cannot physically touch you. The manager in this case is wrong as he should also know that guards can not touch anyone. It’s assault that’s why G4S forbid it. Just for your information.
Check the g4S policy if you don’t believe me. Reasonable force is correct but only when you are attacked first. Trust me I know I work as a security guard.
Incredible there is always an easy way and a hard way to do things and when the paranoia sets in it’s seriously hilarious yet disturbing.
All those public employees need to be fired for complete incompetence, the disdain they have for the public is disgraceful, all as dumb as bag of hammers
I didn’t realise he flew to Africa to make this job centre video
I know a little over representation if it's only3.3 % of the population
@@dunningkruger4863 like TV adverts and the first people MSM find to interview.
Wow! No wonder the country is in a state when you have all these fools trying to sort out a simple problem. Every single one of them needs to be educated. Well done again to DJ
They are not fools, you are fools for allowing this to happen in YOUR country.
Been waiting on part 2 🙌 Thankyou I’ll watch now
G4S - Gagging for Steroids.
If the person @14.20 wants to make assumptions and accusations about YOU then we should do the same. I believe the only reason he works here is to get the names and addresses of single mothers with young female children for his later personal gratification. Isn’t that how accusations work😈.
Scuffy unprofessional staff again.
Ask not aks,class! Man destroying the English language and was told! 😂😂
I love it when they put their hand over the camera. I've got his fingerprints now.....
red jumper man is like a broken record leave or sit every time you try and explain they talk over you.
Was this Stockwell Africa?
Wow. That was honestly extremely difficult to watch. The absolute level of ignorance and intelligence. Claims to be trying to protect public information whilst having the public's information on public display despite being told it can clearly be seen by anyone looking. The guy in the white shirt was just totally beyond any logic comprehension with an array of pressumptions that he'd decided and was to ignorant to listen or understand whilst trying to prove how good an employee he is to his boss. I hope you pass all your findings to the highest level possible based on their treatment of a member of public acting lawfully, their attempt to stir up & instigate other members of public against you, their condescending & rude manner, failure to wear their SIA badges, their failure to kept the public's information private & confidential, their failure to alert the public of their right to private conversations in private rooms, their assault on you and hopefully once this is seen they be returning to the job centre as job seekers after their fired for such a poor performance in the fiduciary duties.
I am a little disappointed that you didn't let them remove you, as that would've not been reasonable with no grounds for removing you from a public space we pay for and a bit gutted you didn't wait for the police to come educate them about the right to film in any public place.
Have you seen the first video?
It is difficult to watch on so many levels. If one is dealing with the public, then one needs to have excellent communication skills. De-escalation skills didn't appear to be used at all. One os not going to have good results if several members of security surround a person.
The behaviour was not the best. They might not have completed understood what he was doing. At the same time, they need to liaise a bit better with members of the public.
People are so triggered by cameras.
That clown in the white shirt needs to be nowhere near the public, he's an absolute danger to every single member of the public that come in contact with him. That manager couldn't manage his finger up his arse. Worst behaviour I have ever seen from public servants. If that clown of a manager is still in a job next week after his actions here I'll be shocked.
lack of diversity in the workplace
They we're no doubt told by the police that he was allowed to be there and do what he was doing, yet they continue to behave like this. Guy holding paper should be fired from what ever job he is meant to be doing.
What country was this ?
I don’t understand what your purpose is. You allowed yourself to be attacked by security guards. You witness crimes and violations of GDPR. You walk out with nothing except a video. You can’t deny your purpose is only to film confrontations if that is all you do
You should have called the police the moment you were assaulted. You can’t call this journalism until you have returned and show us that the screens are not protected and the guards are wearing their badges.
to expect screen protectors after on visit, and see no visible govt change of policy, does not mean a start has not been made; [if all customers took their phones in staff would soon look the other way.... or else close the centres all over the UK to be re-designed!]
How many times have BBC Watchdog or Panorama seen no change in rogue biz, Govt depts, etc, after many many confrontations - it's the norm to carry on as before; those holding power hate truth and change; thus losing/questioning their power/status - it hits their smug pride; we see that in govt daily
Vulnerable customers watching a man harassed and attacked by security guards for just filming isn’t disturbing? Stupid petty and causing a disturbance. These officials are breaching peoples privacy every day but make a nonsense of someone with a camera. Passive aggressive woman who attacks someone’s rights and acts as if she is holier than everyone else. What a shambles of a government
That manager has NO control over his staff, who all need firing