The KEY to UNDERSTANDING people: the carrot and the stick

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2023
  • Most of the popular metrics people use to understand others -- attachment styles, Myers-Briggs, love languages -- are functionally useless for predicting behavior. The key to understanding others lies in appreciating the incentives under which they are operating: the carrot and the stick. Keep in mind that, in order to be motivating, these incentives don't actually have to exist in reality: they need only exist in their perceptions. In this episode, I discuss some of the ramifications of these observations.
    Social Media
    Facebook: profile.php?id=1...
    LinkedIn: / orion-taraban-070b45168
    Instagram: / psyc.hacks
    Twitter: / oriontaraban
    Website: oriontarabanpsyd.com
    Orion's Theme: • Enrico Deiana - Orion'...
    Thinking of going to grad school? Check out STELLAR, my top-rated GRE self-study program based on the world's only empirically-validated test prep system. Use the code "PSYCH" for 10% off all membership plans: stellargre.com.
    Become a Stellar affiliate and earn a 10% commission for every membership purchased by a new student you conduct into the program: stellargre.tapfiliate.com.
    GRE Bites: / @grebites4993
    Become a Psychonaut and join PsycHack's member community:
    / @psychacks
    Book a paid consultation:
    oriontarabanpsyd.com/consulta...
    Sound mixing/editing by: valntinomusic.com
    Presented by Orion Taraban, Psy.D. PsycHacks provides viewers with a brief, thought-provoking video several days a week on a variety of psychological topics, inspired by his clinical practice. The intention is for the core idea contained within each video to inspire viewers to see something about themselves or their world in a slightly different light. The ultimate mission of the channel is to reduce the amount of unnecessary suffering in the world.
    #psychology #personality #wisdom

КОМЕНТАРІ • 416

  • @psychacks
    @psychacks  7 місяців тому +24

    Most of the popular metrics people use to understand others -- attachment styles, Myers-Briggs, love languages -- are functionally useless for predicting behavior. The key to understanding others lies in appreciating the incentives under which they are operating: the carrot and the stick. Keep in mind that, in order to be motivating, these incentives don't actually have to exist in reality: they need only exist in their perceptions. In this episode, I discuss some of the ramifications of these observations.
    Social Media
    Facebook: facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090053889622
    LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/orion-taraban-070b45168/
    Instagram: instagram.com/psyc.hacks
    Twitter: twitter.com/oriontaraban
    Website: oriontarabanpsyd.com
    Orion's Theme: ua-cam.com/video/WrXBzQ2HDEQ/v-deo.html
    Thinking of going to grad school? Check out STELLAR, my top-rated GRE self-study program based on the world's only empirically-validated test prep system. Use the code "PSYCH" for 10% off all membership plans: stellargre.com.
    Become a Stellar affiliate and earn a 10% commission for every membership purchased by a new student you conduct into the program: stellargre.tapfiliate.com.
    GRE Bites: www.youtube.com/@grebites4993
    Become a Psychonaut and join PsycHack's member community:
    ua-cam.com/channels/SduXBjCHkLoo_y9ss2xzXw.htmljoin
    Book a paid consultation:
    oriontarabanpsyd.com/consultations
    Sound mixing/editing by: valntinomusic.com
    Presented by Orion Taraban, Psy.D. PsycHacks provides viewers with a brief, thought-provoking video several days a week on a variety of psychological topics, inspired by his clinical practice. The intention is for the core idea contained within each video to inspire viewers to see something about themselves or their world in a slightly different light. The ultimate mission of the channel is to reduce the amount of unnecessary suffering in the world.
    #psychology #personality #wisdom

    • @johnbrill7909
      @johnbrill7909 5 місяців тому

      What do you think of the Enneagram?

    • @1Whipperin
      @1Whipperin 3 дні тому

      Behaviorism never fails if properly understood.

  • @HominisLupis
    @HominisLupis 3 місяці тому +21

    Hey Dr. O, this is a guy currently in Bumfuck, India, that's thanking you with what I can afford, in a disastrous currency thats taking a whooping against the dollar, because i just want to say... Thank you.

    • @BMWS1000RRR
      @BMWS1000RRR 3 місяці тому +3

      Damn, this is alot of money.

  • @Doberman_6773
    @Doberman_6773 7 місяців тому +183

    As a reformed people-pleaser, I agree 100% with Dr. Taraban; I just wish I had known this earlier in life.

    • @MrBoxofplastic
      @MrBoxofplastic 7 місяців тому +11

      Amen to that.

    • @jonathanthomas2444
      @jonathanthomas2444 7 місяців тому +22

      Same. His explanation made perfect sense. My perception about people's disapproval or other 'negative' responses was disproportionately inflated in my mind.

    • @rm6857
      @rm6857 7 місяців тому +4

      Best is just to not care...

    • @Pk-wu9tl
      @Pk-wu9tl 7 місяців тому

      so true. Only realised that now.@@jonathanthomas2444

    • @Doberman_6773
      @Doberman_6773 7 місяців тому +3

      @@rm6857 As a default position, yes; keep your eye out for exceptions though.

  • @AncientTrogloxene
    @AncientTrogloxene 7 місяців тому +16

    "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle."
    -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
    Hold a contract to their head and make them do it.
    Well done. Discovering the internal sticks and carrots can be difficult.

  • @matthewtalks2970
    @matthewtalks2970 7 місяців тому +77

    A literal goldmine you are. Would love a more practical example of how we can apply this in real life situations, like a case studie of some sorts, comments are always welcome! Have a great weekend all ❤

    • @distinctloafer
      @distinctloafer 7 місяців тому +21

      You gotta tip him in proportion to the value you feel you've derived from the video first.

    • @CeceliPS3
      @CeceliPS3 7 місяців тому +5

      He rarely gives practical examples.

    • @Hollowed2wiz
      @Hollowed2wiz 7 місяців тому +13

      ​@@CeceliPS3yeah, psychacks is like the teacher that explain the lesson but don't always give exercises with the correction. To have something a little bit more concrete I would recommend the channel hoe_maths. There you can see a lot of examples of what psychacks is talking about but in the context of modern dating for people in there 20's.
      Then again, hoe_maths is like half theory, half practice.
      For true case studies the best is still to do your own experiences. Learn the principles taught by these channels, think how you could verify these principles in your own life, do the experiments, analyze the results and conclude how accurate and useful their ideas are to your own circumstances. Kinda like the scientific approach.

    • @matthewtalks2970
      @matthewtalks2970 7 місяців тому

      @@Hollowed2wiz Thank you for your very elaborative response, it is appreciated!

    • @matthewtalks2970
      @matthewtalks2970 7 місяців тому

      @@distinctloafer Hahahaha smooth

  • @sliggoon
    @sliggoon 7 місяців тому +39

    i was just thinking about this yesterday. it's important to listen actively to what people are saying and then think about why they might be saying it or acting the way they are

    • @valdius85
      @valdius85 7 місяців тому +3

      Listen and ask, not listen and assume 😂

    • @susanhaines7358
      @susanhaines7358 3 місяці тому

      Great comment

  • @kylemacdougall8355
    @kylemacdougall8355 7 місяців тому +72

    It's absolutely true that carrots and sticks are often subjective, and they can vary a lot from person to person. But isn't it possible that certain psychological frameworks (like the Big Five personality traits) could help us gauge how likely a person is to respond strongly to a certain carrot or stick? It seems like the carrot-and-stick idea and the psychological frameworks wouldn't necessarily be in conflict with each other.

    • @HawkeyeVoid
      @HawkeyeVoid 7 місяців тому +12

      Yeah behaviorism “carrot and stick” is useful, but not in isolation

    • @peggz223
      @peggz223 7 місяців тому +8

      I suppose as an experienced phycologist, Taraban is very interested in a single person’s perception and experience in life, like one of his many clients, it is his job after all lol. Those formal phycological frameworks could definitely be used to generalize a person’s behavior and predict their perspectives, that make sense to me. It’s quite attractive to the general population because it’s broad, quick and simple, a lot less strenuous and time consuming than years of professional education and study.

    • @codniggh1139
      @codniggh1139 7 місяців тому +3

      Most of them are BS. It has been knwo that all of those personality tests don't work, that is known since 1940 when they were made, and psuchologist said this, the ones that made them. But yes, for general population is fun and simple to have something like that that tell you a personality. That is also why in the US Supreme Court, psychological test are forbidden as proof, even if therapy is recommended that only work as a starting point becauise maybe the diagnosis will change. this is why is not so useful to know personality, specially for people that is not psychologist.

    • @anonbattler
      @anonbattler 7 місяців тому +4

      Exactly what I thought. The personality models actually help with understanding someone's motivations as everyone has their own personal versions of carrots and sticks. If Tariban as a psychologist were to assess someone based on his or her psychological carrots and sticks, his assessment would likely be mappable to one of the categories from the personality frameworks.

    • @nunyabidness3075
      @nunyabidness3075 7 місяців тому +3

      @@codniggh1139There are lots of disagreements on how useful the type systems are, as there has been forever. So you hear they are useless and useful depending on who you ask.
      I learned about the Myers Briggs from a chaplain in the Army. He accurately predicted the short careers of myself and another new officer in our class based on our type. We also probably had the two highest IQ scores in our class, lol.

  • @John-qt3vt
    @John-qt3vt 7 місяців тому +15

    Possibly my favorite channel on UA-cam currently.

  • @mbg9650
    @mbg9650 7 місяців тому +17

    Living an average life style shouldn't be considered a severe punishment but thanks to social media, it is to guess which gender.

    • @BB-te8tc
      @BB-te8tc 7 місяців тому +7

      I love being boring. It makes me more adaptable and flexible and content not having to be the center of attention

  • @shouldawoulda69
    @shouldawoulda69 7 місяців тому +269

    1st psychologist I have ever seen that states love language is BS!

    • @hachiroku8677
      @hachiroku8677 7 місяців тому +34

      That's why we're all here. lol

    • @patc2515
      @patc2515 7 місяців тому +26

      Honest question here, what makes you say that love languages are BS? In my experience and from what I've seen in others where there are not major behavioral issues with the man or woman involved, learning about and knowing how to work with your partner is love language and they yours has been of nothing but a benefit and I would say it is without a doubt a real thing. I wouldn't say it's everything by any means or that by knowing the love language concept all problems go away or anything like that but I don't understand how someone could say that it's total BS? It's essentially a form of communication and when people align in their ability to communicate in a way the other can hear, there's really only benefit to be had there. I'm sure there's something to support saying they are BS but I don't know what am I missing?

    • @ArmedAssociation
      @ArmedAssociation 7 місяців тому +39

      It's BS because if a woman tells you her love language is food and you give her different food experiences while neglecting what actually motivates her to want to secure you such as your income or status, then you will quickly learn food doesn't matter as much as she led you to believe.

    • @pazzodi3
      @pazzodi3 7 місяців тому +21

      ​@@patc2515as Orion stated it's another form of being self absorbed. Look up the Greek story of Narcissus. Society has become individuals that want to become a persona of success and not a human of value. The entire premise of love is that it's free, not that it wants something in return or that it must be earned, it's free... So there's no one love language, everything must be included, hence why in a former video Orion explains the origin of love from knights that played the game of love and romance with married women. And even when you give any form of love it just be a voluntary sacrifice. Which means humiliation and suffering which makes it a passion. And who are in passion when it comes to romance... Men. So us men are telling women those love language regulations, are BS

    • @msc8382
      @msc8382 7 місяців тому +8

      ​@@ArmedAssociation "It's BS because if a woman tells you her love language is food and you give her different food experiences while neglecting what actually motivates her to want to secure you such as your income or status, then you will quickly learn food doesn't matter as much as she led you to believe."
      That doesn't mean it doesn't work, it means they're lying to you but don't realise themselves. As pazzodi3 put it, its another form of being self-absorbed, and belongs to the scarcity mindset. They're scarce on something, so they hyperfixate on it like a starving animal. Would you argue that when you're starving you can be yourself?
      And it isn't that women don't understand the languages, but they lack the boundaries to bind language to their love. So it doesn't mean they don't have a love language, it means they don't know what love is for them in a way that they can communicate.
      @pazzodi3 "So us men are telling women those love language regulations, are BS"
      Might be possible I'm misunderstanding what this means. Regardless amma guess and respond with:
      You can tell its BS all you want, and that men are making it up to feel better, but down the line everyone has motivations that can be classified, and love language is simply such classification model. Its therefore not bullshit, albeit I'll argue its not as affective to understand a person's motivations. But hey, if someone isn't honest with you, then by all means no classification model can be accurately applied unless you understand the originating motivation behind their expressions. Its simply guessing before that point.
      PS: Not sure what my tone is, but I'm mostly engaging with curiousity. No intentions to offend anyone.

  • @michaeljeffery7466
    @michaeljeffery7466 7 місяців тому +26

    Its pretty easy to understand people. Everyone's full of shit, just identify their motives & you can cut through the bullshit.

    • @Doberman_6773
      @Doberman_6773 7 місяців тому +12

      3 basic principles -
      1. Most human interactions are manipulative;
      2. Most human relationships are transactional;
      3. Most people have no issue getting a 'good deal' at your expense.

    • @bgoodfella7413
      @bgoodfella7413 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Doberman_6773Could these 3 principles be largely influenced and propagated by Consumer Capitalism since, according to Marx, fundamentally depends upon worker exploitation and social alienation?

    • @jonprince3237
      @jonprince3237 7 місяців тому +1

      @@bgoodfella7413 well, which came first, humans or capitalism?

    • @bgoodfella7413
      @bgoodfella7413 7 місяців тому +1

      @@jonprince3237 In many primitive tribes and even third world "socialist" communities today, human relationships are not manipulative and transsactional. They are based on ancient traditions and family ties based on spiritual principles like respecting Mother Nature which Industrialization and burning oil does not.
      You are just a deductive reasoner of your own subjective philosophy which isn't as bright or intelligent as you believe it to be.

  • @aaditpatel9924
    @aaditpatel9924 7 місяців тому +15

    This makes a lot of sense, I really like this episode. Can you expand on this concept further do an episode on how to figure out the carrot and stick incentives that matter to people?

  • @Esther_33
    @Esther_33 6 місяців тому +2

    Im 34, married 10+ years. We have 2 kids and loce each other deeply. Those metrics are all helpful when used together to understand our partners. Men and women think differently and miscommunications are a huge burden on marriage. Understanding my husband is ISTP and im INFP, really helps us give each other space and freedom to accept one another and not try to force the other to change. We accept each others God given natures, but we needed help to figure out how to navigate our differences. Your advice is an added layer of helpfulness but that alone isnt going to keep a marriage for a lifetime. Thats just behaviorism, there is more to connection than "psychology" its MANY LAYERS DEEP.

  • @PayneMaximus
    @PayneMaximus Місяць тому +1

    I understand your analogy with the carrot and the stick; the incentive and the punishment.
    However, I've learned that there are three ways in which to control other people's behavior:
    1. Incentives (carrot)
    2. Emotions
    3. Force (stick)
    Emotions can be a powerful form of control, and can include virtually all emotions, including:
    1. Hatred (you ignite hatred in someone about something and they are likely to do something they wouldn't do otherwise)
    2. Shame (shameful people are likely to withdraw and forfeit multiple activities)
    3. Honor/virtue/etc (people are likely to do things if you convince them that such is the "right" way, the "virtuose" way)

  • @redblue2456
    @redblue2456 7 місяців тому

    Dr.Taraban you’ve come at the right time for us.

  • @the_eerie_faerie_tales
    @the_eerie_faerie_tales 7 місяців тому +1

    Dr. Orion Taraban is a true gift! Thank you and Happy Holidays.

  • @daniellyons6473
    @daniellyons6473 7 місяців тому +13

    Awesome episode! Thank you for what you do!!

  • @MDCigan
    @MDCigan 7 місяців тому +4

    I think your point about incentives and punishment driving behavior is excellent but I've personally found BOTH MBTI and Love Languages phenomenally useful in understanding people and women I date

    • @MDCigan
      @MDCigan 7 місяців тому +2

      For example, love languages basically outlines what you and someone else see as "rewards". My GF and I share physical touch as our #1 and acts of service and words of affirmation so we both find it naturally rewarding the way we both interact

  • @sandywright7554
    @sandywright7554 7 місяців тому +19

    Am so glad you raised this topic Orion. Admittedly I personally like the Meyers-Briggs Personality Profiling as a Framework for filtering. Being an INFJ, Intuition and gut instinct is almost 99.9% accurate for me, however I do concede that the MB Framework may not be everybody's cup of tea... it is used widely today in job selection. I believe the system has merit.
    P. S. : I Love your channel... whether you know this or not... by helping men back to their Devine Masculine, you are allowing women to step back into their Devine Femininity.😊

    • @Tubalcane_6.8
      @Tubalcane_6.8 7 місяців тому +1

      I agree with your perception, his diatribe reduces human function down 2 a risk / reward reaction similar 2 training a dog 4 good behavior. I use the MBTI as part of a composite, it not only provides insight but also allows me 2 determine if I can make the needed adjustments 2 fit a given personality. Carrots & Sticks, like Trix, R 4 kids

    • @strikingitrich7630
      @strikingitrich7630 7 місяців тому +3

      Meyer-Briggs is about as useful as astrology and Tarot cards.

    • @stephanvillavicencio5679
      @stephanvillavicencio5679 7 місяців тому +1

      you beat me to speak. i too am an INFJ. I love myers briggs. I am still learning about the "cognitive functions." i will admit that it is a bit "difficult to navigate" for the average person. (i theorize that intuitive persons would be able to put it to work.) Nevertheless, I still believe that Dr Taraban has given me much useful insight, especially the tips that bring me "back to earth," such as embracing the masculine and feminine qualities of people.

    • @RaeAria
      @RaeAria 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@stephanvillavicencio5679I think we enjoy Meyers Briggs because we finally feel understood. Infjs are rare and often misunderstood. Not exactly an easy personality type.

    • @irisowenomoruyi663
      @irisowenomoruyi663 7 місяців тому +1

      @@strikingitrich7630Not true! I study Vedic astrology and Meyers Briggs is most advanced.

  • @ismaelhall3990
    @ismaelhall3990 7 місяців тому +1

    I will always be impressed by this gentleman.

  • @meditationstation2000
    @meditationstation2000 7 місяців тому +1

    This man doesn’t miss!

  • @GG-lm9ik
    @GG-lm9ik 7 місяців тому +1

    Any time you are ready to start doing long form talks, I’m ready to pay for them. Love your insights.

  • @noahbbbell
    @noahbbbell 7 місяців тому

    You just helped me get started on putting some finishing touches on somethings. Big appreciation, which is why I'm commenting cause that's about all I can do to support this big dawg wisdom.

  • @risseeuwe
    @risseeuwe 7 місяців тому +24

    The incentives concept and the personality frameworks like MBTI complement each other. I find the MBTI theory extremely helpful in predicting my own and others behaviour, and to understand what makes people tick. Knowing someone’s MBTI type definitely helps with finding their strengths or what they like, and their blind spots or their fears.

    • @irisowenomoruyi663
      @irisowenomoruyi663 7 місяців тому +1

      True!

    • @joshua_finch
      @joshua_finch 6 місяців тому

      Why does an INFJ's auxiliary have to be extraverted feeling? Why couldn't it be extaverted intuition?

    • @joshua_finch
      @joshua_finch 6 місяців тому

      How is introverted feeling different from introverted thinking?

    • @joshua_finch
      @joshua_finch 6 місяців тому

      I have read Jung on types and didn't get satisfying answers.

  • @dougscribner
    @dougscribner 7 місяців тому +4

    Love how you boil things down to easy to understand concepts... in a hard to understand, seemingly inconsistent and confusing field of study (human behavior). You bring such clarity.

  • @ayodike
    @ayodike 3 місяці тому +1

    This is one of the most PRACTICAL videos I have watched, thank you.

  • @maxspiess1990
    @maxspiess1990 7 місяців тому

    A LOT of wisdom in this video, as always, Thanks for sharing all these videos for free

  • @timothybaker4091
    @timothybaker4091 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you.
    You made me realize that I am the perfect carrot for my person of interests present and intermediate future. Now we need to check our personal compatibility.

  • @seanwalker2555
    @seanwalker2555 7 місяців тому +2

    Thanks Orion

  • @valdius85
    @valdius85 7 місяців тому +1

    It makes sense.
    My life experience so far teaches me that most people don’t care to act and they’d rather destroy the relationship. Taking for granted is very common. You spoke about it already.

  • @A.Robert
    @A.Robert 3 місяці тому +1

    Very usefull video. The way Dr. Taraban describes psycholgy is amazing!

  • @yungnatedagreat
    @yungnatedagreat 7 місяців тому +2

    I found you're yt channel out yesterday and your videos are insightful, as a 20 yr old guy. This seems to be better source of information than those diluted online videos on men and women and relationship dynamics.

  • @Green-I-be
    @Green-I-be 7 місяців тому +1

    I'm very much appreciating this content. Not only it is useful in relationships of love. But it's very important, normal relationships with colleges, neighbours and friends.
    Thank you

  • @jeanpaul4100
    @jeanpaul4100 7 місяців тому +2

    I have been working on detachment and find myself farrr less anxiuos. Thank you for the lesson.

  • @margaretc5679
    @margaretc5679 6 місяців тому

    Eye-opening perspective. Thank you!

  • @RShaun
    @RShaun 7 місяців тому +1

    As always, great insights.

  • @angamerc5373
    @angamerc5373 7 місяців тому

    This is an awesome talk. Very insightful.

  • @Rheynez
    @Rheynez 7 місяців тому

    Thank you Orion

  • @DoodleDuduDude
    @DoodleDuduDude 7 місяців тому

    You’re outstanding. Thank you ✊

  • @MostlyBuicks
    @MostlyBuicks 7 місяців тому +2

    Yes, incentives and motivations are the best predictor. It tells you WHY people do what they do. People do things for a payoff. You may not UNDERSTAND what they consider a payoff, but that is irrelevant to understanding their motivation and incentive.

  • @jimdandy8996
    @jimdandy8996 7 місяців тому

    Excellent discussion

  • @PioLisieux
    @PioLisieux 7 місяців тому +20

    You speak with authority and logic. Just two of the reasons why I watch you and respect your content.

  • @asiamonet8830
    @asiamonet8830 7 місяців тому +5

    Great video!
    I laughed almost the entire time. I never knew it but, i guess i spent all this time working out my own carrots and sticks, realizing that others do the most to try and figure out what they are. I suppose that ive landed on the ethics part of the situation and practical application.
    The thumbnail is righteous illustration because how you piece together the notes generally LOOKS crazy...

  • @coldandafraid
    @coldandafraid 7 місяців тому +8

    Honestly im using this more introspectively. Like when you say how people tend to imagine carrots and sticks that dont exist in reality. Although i feel confident in my ability to be realistic, i think paying more attention to where my ideas of sticks comes from can help with my anxiety issues i deal with day to day. Ive always had success "logic-ing" my way out of mental ruts, and this is a very useful tool for such endeavors!

    • @user-uc7qb1su4e
      @user-uc7qb1su4e 7 місяців тому

      What are some examples of sticks and carrots? You don’t have to say your own ones

  • @poface2
    @poface2 7 місяців тому +1

    I think the myers briggs is useful to understand oneself. Helped me understand that being creative is more important than to keep trying to push my creativity aside to fit in to society. And it's been true since I've made creativity a priority and stopped trying do what other people do well naturally to keep up with them. I now carve my own path in my skill set. Mbti helped me there.

  • @radzhurl8711
    @radzhurl8711 7 місяців тому

    When you have been hurt narcissists and healing and seeing reality then Dr Taraban gives the absolute truth, I was chasing the carrot to avoid pain...but only pain comes more and more.❤

  • @nehanshu17
    @nehanshu17 7 місяців тому +1

    Daammn! This goes hard! I’m so glad I subscribed to this channel🔥🔥

  • @marriagecausesdivorce7540
    @marriagecausesdivorce7540 7 місяців тому +12

    Listening to people like Dr David Buss and The Lead Attorney, both seem to agree a very important personality trait in the wife is calmness, peacefulness, patience, tolerance to stress, emotional stability, agreeableness. If your wife is aggressive, bossy, combative, disagreeable you will end up in a high conflict divorce.

    • @ALForb
      @ALForb 7 місяців тому +3

      All due respect, it's wild that this observation is considered insightful. Aggressive, bossy, combative people generally don't do well at maintaining any kind of relationship. It should be as simple as saying "just find someone you get along with", but from what I can tell from the whingings of redpilled guys, most of them seem to just zombie-walk into relationships, and after applying zero selective measures, they're utterly shocked to find their spouse is a antisocial disaster (who likely saw the guy for the sucker he was).

    • @ssing7113
      @ssing7113 7 місяців тому

      Well yes. But a lot of people don’t want that or they wouldn’t be married to these “crazy women” 😂
      Some people like the highs of conflict. Tension. Jealousies. Arguments. Never knowing where you stand. . Or all these women would be single and also it’s biased to put that on women. Men are just as crazy and crap as there is that type of women

    • @showcase0525
      @showcase0525 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@ALForbif you think most guys have the optionally to apply selectiveness that your holding in your mind, then you might reevaluate your position.

    • @ALForb
      @ALForb 7 місяців тому +1

      @@showcase0525 I think I understand what you're saying...
      I didn't say it was easy. I went through seven lonely years of celibacy before I met my wife. It was well worth the wait.

    • @showcase0525
      @showcase0525 7 місяців тому +3

      @@ALForb Glad you had a positive outcome, but unfortunately your experience is reinforcing my point. No optionality, no means to apply selective measures.

  • @tommywei4165
    @tommywei4165 6 місяців тому

    this dude is elite, every video he makes is a goldmine basically

  • @mrpuzzz
    @mrpuzzz 7 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @the_eerie_faerie_tales
    @the_eerie_faerie_tales 7 місяців тому +38

    I can't wait for your book!! Please let us know soon as it's out. I will be getting it right away!
    *y'all he mentioned this on a recent show with FnF 😊

  • @showxating9885
    @showxating9885 7 місяців тому

    I'm not sure if your name sounds like a hyperspace lane or the frequency that's sets minds up to understand how other people work, but you're on point consistently and without the nonsense modern psychology has adopted in fear of their own carrot/stick decision. I jest as someone who gave his kids 800 years old names, so your parents have to be cool. I'm much more well versed in the oddities of human interactions and reactions, but you manage to repeatedly put observations I've made into words. Thank you.

  • @CarlWithACamera
    @CarlWithACamera 7 місяців тому +1

    I've long said that fear of loss, in the stock market, is 4x the motivator versus greed (opportunity for gain). This is why so many sell at the bottom, when pain is greatest, completely missing the fact that this is also when opportunity is actually greatest. I was off by only a fraction in my calculation.

  • @rastalique8114
    @rastalique8114 7 місяців тому +3

    In gambling, I ALWAYS remember the many of losses over the few wins. (I live in Vegas, so I sometimes put a twenty in a machine at a grocery store. )

    • @PewterPan
      @PewterPan 2 місяці тому

      Maybe you should stop doing that.

  • @RupertMcGruber
    @RupertMcGruber 7 місяців тому

    Great topic! Please expand in future videos!

  • @rome6872
    @rome6872 7 місяців тому +1

    Brilliant rundown. One must ask what in your opinion is the best way to find out someone's sticks & carrot.
    The 1st thought is to ask questions, but the subject may not even know it themselves because most people live in a personal reality and not true. Questioning them may work but also may not. Maybe a mixture of questions and observations but the latter takes longer.

  • @bjchen728
    @bjchen728 7 місяців тому

    Thanks

  • @ALLAHFRNDLY
    @ALLAHFRNDLY 7 місяців тому

    i think youre exactly correct

  • @Tom-9147
    @Tom-9147 6 місяців тому

    Thanks from Austria! Great content!

  • @patrickgrengs7594
    @patrickgrengs7594 7 місяців тому +1

    Yes, right there at 3:53 -- "Human Action" -- the distillate of Ludvig von Mises book by the same name. Individuals (Human Beings) work toward their own individual benefit -- each of their Human Actions is performed as a means to avoid pain (or discomfort) Or to seek pleasure (comfort)... actions are often cumulative in terms of manifesting a meta-goal such that a measure of discomfort is party to a larger pleasure (achievement). Climbing a mountain (literally) is just one example of this paradigm. If the goal's measure of value is diminished, then the amount of discomfort accomodated will decrease to the point of recognizing a Critical Point -- find a new goal, change directions, invest resources accordingly.

  • @inalee7212
    @inalee7212 7 місяців тому

    Your video is so amazing. Keep it up and you will do GREAT

  • @roses6564
    @roses6564 5 місяців тому +1

    Fantastic insight. Yes, it fits with my experience. :)

  • @jenniferkopp2923
    @jenniferkopp2923 7 місяців тому

    Fascinating

  • @Raul.bm7
    @Raul.bm7 7 місяців тому

    wow, this was gold

  • @BrunoGabrielAraujoLebtag
    @BrunoGabrielAraujoLebtag 7 місяців тому

    That's a powerful framework...

  • @15690asdfg
    @15690asdfg 2 місяці тому

    amazing

  • @alikhalil2863
    @alikhalil2863 7 місяців тому

    The best!

  • @Bibbo8844hdbks
    @Bibbo8844hdbks 7 місяців тому

    Good stuff Doc.

  • @ertewqrqwerqrweqqwer
    @ertewqrqwerqrweqqwer 7 місяців тому

    The Dr. Does it again

  • @KomalSingh-cm8gc
    @KomalSingh-cm8gc 7 місяців тому

    Mind blowing,orion :)

  • @Dr.guydoingthings
    @Dr.guydoingthings 5 місяців тому

    I’ve thought this for a long time.

  • @zoraster3749
    @zoraster3749 7 місяців тому

    “When value is clear, decisions are easy.”

  • @andrewcliffe4753
    @andrewcliffe4753 7 місяців тому

    Great video

  • @diegotejera2742
    @diegotejera2742 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice mid century setup Doc 😉

  • @btwthblood
    @btwthblood 7 місяців тому

    People like to understand themselves and others.

  • @gabrielsanto6034
    @gabrielsanto6034 5 місяців тому

    This is awsome

  • @leonardmilcin7798
    @leonardmilcin7798 7 місяців тому +9

    Unfortunately, the problem with incentives is that not many people really react to incentives as much as we think they do.
    Heck, even I procrastinate constantly and even when in my best interest would be to get myself to really focus on my work for couple of days.
    I am also regularly putting off making important decisions or actions even when I know in my best interest is to do them quickly.
    So incentives is something that is good to understand but we also have to understand that many people behave irrationally or contrary to their own interests and they are frequently aware of the fact that they are hurting themselves with their own actions -- and still can't do much about it.
    Some people I know can act according to their incentives and just this is enough to get them to be wildly successful. Yes, just not sabotaging yourself is enough to be very successful person.

    • @psychacks
      @psychacks  7 місяців тому +18

      Keep in mind that incentives are what *actually* motivate behavior -- not what we might think *should* do so.

    • @cmdplaytowin
      @cmdplaytowin 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@psychacks not just positive incentives, avoiding pain or loss is also an incentive to get off your butt. Contentment is another a factor that plays a role in how aggressive or conservative a person might be.

    • @codniggh1139
      @codniggh1139 7 місяців тому +1

      procrastination is also a matter of carrot and stick, but very complex, because people procatrstrinate beause the internalized stick is more powerful than the apparent carrot.

  • @irisowenomoruyi663
    @irisowenomoruyi663 7 місяців тому

    MBTI helped me immensely in choosing a partner in my culture. Lol!
    True! You always have to consider their environment & values.

  • @user-kt5gr8gy4o
    @user-kt5gr8gy4o 7 місяців тому

    Love your channel bro

  • @johnathonlay5302
    @johnathonlay5302 3 місяці тому

    Please elaborate further or give examples of both carrots and sticks in another video! Great content!

  • @cesarcaminero-fr3zv
    @cesarcaminero-fr3zv Місяць тому

    Valeu!

  • @gborghi01
    @gborghi01 7 місяців тому

    Sun in Leo 🤣 I love you Doc! This is gold

  • @cucdeceas
    @cucdeceas 7 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @sagu1lar
    @sagu1lar 7 місяців тому

    Personalities in human beings are a very real thing.

  • @aidend3423
    @aidend3423 7 місяців тому

    Makes sense

  • @VE_LORD
    @VE_LORD 7 місяців тому

    using carrot and sticks are fine and as you pointed out finding out what is a carrot and what is a stick to every individual is extremely variable. now this is where I think other frameworks come in, carrot and sticks! yes I agree, so what framework would you use to know whether something is a stick or a carrot for a particular individual, if you decided to use trial and error on every human on the planet there would be a lot of variance but some people would still fall closer to some than others. then you would have created your own framework. For example a person's father passes away, some people would like to be constantly around other people while some would like to be alone, and just like that a category has been created. as you said most people are not special and we all know someone in our lives who behaves very similarly to someone else that we are also close to. I simply would not recommend going trial and error with every single person in our lives, even if that's what most people do, understanding them a little before hand will definitely be more effective in getting what one wants in almost all scenarios. As someone with a Ph.D in psychology i would to clarify if you think all the research on personality types (Big five and MBTI) was a waste of time and it is not really useful?

  • @user-xl9oi7qs2f
    @user-xl9oi7qs2f 4 місяці тому +1

    “You’re really only limited by the punitive function of society and your own conscience” 🤣🤣

  • @TheIgnoredGender
    @TheIgnoredGender 7 місяців тому +7

    Now I'm in the mood to snack on some carrot sticks

    • @the_eerie_faerie_tales
      @the_eerie_faerie_tales 7 місяців тому +1

      But the important question is... with or without ranch? ☺

    • @leonardvanonselen
      @leonardvanonselen 7 місяців тому

      A GSOH is always refreshing...I definitely chuckled 👍

  • @eche1492
    @eche1492 7 місяців тому

    Taurus Sun and Moon. As a manager of people it is difficult to determine what is the reward for some people. One would think $$$, but that's not always the case. Some people like the stick and use it to get attention, in this case the stick is the carrot!

  • @shriashish21
    @shriashish21 7 місяців тому +9

    This is a FANTASTIC episode. Could you do a more detailed follow up episode on how to determine what peoples carrots and sticks are?

    • @jonathanthomas2444
      @jonathanthomas2444 7 місяців тому

      Sentiment is the same. It felt like a teaser. I was so locked in and then tue episode ended.😅

    • @RupertMcGruber
      @RupertMcGruber 7 місяців тому

      Agreed, too interesting a topic! Please expand.

    • @Tnc874
      @Tnc874 7 місяців тому +1

      Letting them talk about their past is the easiest way. We are all children who grow up and are forced to be adults. But I think its pretty easy. We are all human, with the same brain chemicals surging thru out bodies. But you definitely have to get an understanding of their childhood

    • @Daniel-ef7nk
      @Daniel-ef7nk 7 місяців тому

      True we need more concrete examples

  • @alexvignolo7798
    @alexvignolo7798 5 місяців тому

    My high school economics teacher preached the same thing about incentives. Does that make love a business? It’s certainly an exchange of services. Often negotiated passive aggressively by women.

  • @pooya9288
    @pooya9288 7 місяців тому

    holy shit! that was awesome. i never thought about it that way!

  • @monikasolymos2396
    @monikasolymos2396 Місяць тому

    I think, that the sticks and carrots are consequences of deeper emotions, and even the perception of them is.
    My father used to quote someone, I don't remember who:" If a woman loves you, she forgives all your mistakes, but if she doesn't, she won't even forgive what you do right."

    • @monikasolymos2396
      @monikasolymos2396 Місяць тому

      Or maybe it was with flaws and streghts, but it is the same,

  • @Mr.C_101
    @Mr.C_101 7 місяців тому +3

    In a Post-Apocalyptic world, I'll be using this to RULE and RECRUIT my Gang of Looters ... and I'll have an actual Stick that I will nickname "Carrot"

  • @payan166
    @payan166 10 днів тому

    Edit this: although I like most of your contributions, I must say this one really disappointed me. I am a coach and know how personality types can help people see their own filters, as well as the filters of others. Of course filters are not all what count, but in a Family setting or office relationship, it really helps.

  • @user-lj9hv3zz9u
    @user-lj9hv3zz9u 2 місяці тому

    Heck yeah. Been a kind person, but not really a nice guy. Gets me into trouble with my narcissistic younger violent alcoholic brother. On an island in the middle of the ocean so I can’t escape, so I go no contact/ as I have aged I feel like Bartleby the scrivener, I would prefer not to, so I stay in my lane and seek out people who are purpose driven towards life and less victim driven. Also appreciate people who don’t choose the red or blue pill, I prefer the third pill, the choice not to choose. Choice is so convoluted these days. Anyway, you are a cool dude, appreciated your Mark interview. Next level intellectual rambling you can do, love it. I definitely can’t afford to talk to you, but if I could, I would. Funny how money is the best incentive for most carbon units these days. I find incentives in the now and maybe one day living under a bridge cause I just couldn’t get into society and it’s group psyche. Resisting anyway. ❤😂🤙

  • @robertbeckler5058
    @robertbeckler5058 7 місяців тому +1

    Groovy

  • @jamescollins408
    @jamescollins408 7 місяців тому +1

    You need to identify someones AGENDA.
    That is a good indicator of how someone will behave.

  • @ALForb
    @ALForb 7 місяців тому +4

    It's true that incentives carry a lot of explanatory power when it comes human behaviour (and the behaviour of life in general), but it's unwise for one to move through their interpersonal terrain with carrots and sticks at the forefront of their thoughts. Prioritizing "getting what you want" out of a social life is what a psychopath does. In my experience, that kind of person can be successful in a Machiavellian sense, but they don't tend to build meaningful relationships. You need to have a genuine and affectionate curiosity about individuals if you're to truly understand them in a way that enriches your social life.

    • @psychacks
      @psychacks  7 місяців тому +1

      So...is building meaningful relationships and having genuine curiosity what you want out of life?

    • @ALForb
      @ALForb 7 місяців тому +1

      @@psychacks Yes, good point. But doing so doesn't involve many carrots or sticks.

    • @ssing7113
      @ssing7113 7 місяців тому +2

      I’ve found the people that say they aren’t driven by ego / narcissism … and want to be altruistic are the ones you have to worry about most
      This is life and best to understand the game then live in fantasy land. How many men got screwed over thinking “but she loves me” or how many women think offering sex will make a man commit to them. It takes more then “love” to turn the wheels of life
      I always have to use the analogy. You love your wife conditionally. No you don’t have unconditional love for her. If she wanted to do whatever she wanted and you unconditionally supported that. Then you’d be ok if she brought over three dudes and kicked you out of your house to have fun in bed with them. No you would not love that person anymore because why….. an unmet expectation that you have in the relationship she would never dare dream of doing something like that. It’s all conditional at the end of the day. Best accept it so you don’t get ran over at the railroads of divorce court or at least be informed what consequences could be.

    • @ALForb
      @ALForb 7 місяців тому +1

      @@ssing7113 I don’t deny at all that there’s always a layer of game theory happening, not only in all human interactions, but in all of nature, and I think it’s interesting and it’s good to have an understanding of it. But there are many other layers in a relationship, especially with a friend or spouse, including (sure, always conditional) love. Perhaps I’m a sap, but I’ll always intentionally focus on my affection for people over ever contemplating their carrots/sticks, and this outlook has resulted in a social life and a marriage that keep me happy and healthy. Again, I agree that one should have some awareness of incentives, but I find that people who put an intentional focus on game theory in their relationships tend to reap what they sow.

    • @serge6598
      @serge6598 7 місяців тому

      What if my stick is other people trying to figure out what my carrot and sticks are and my carrot is people just trying to chill and hang out and not stress too much about trying to get things from me.

  • @rockinstrumentalcovers2063
    @rockinstrumentalcovers2063 7 місяців тому

    It,s better to be feared than loved Machiavelli once said.