This video is part of the second course of our *ElectrONiX* massive open online course (MOOC) series. You can sign up for the course *ElectrONiX - Digital* for free on the following link: imoox.at/course/digital ElectrONiX MOOC series: imoox.at/series/electronix
Great video! But at 8:34, why do you use the conjunctive minimal form (since you're looking at the zeros), but then multiply ('and') the variables and separate the terms with a '+' ('or')? I learned it's the other way around. And my other question is: at 9:29, you took the solution from the Karnaugh map for Y and randomly created a Y dash out of it without inverting the terms so that the equation remains correct. I would appreciate a quick response because my test is on Tuesday :D Thank you!
in the last example, did you serialize the two paths (1: A(B+CD) 2: C'(BD+A'B'D') ) when turning into pull up? I think they remained parallel in your representation
You guys keep thanking below the comment section without really paying any attention? The truth table and logical expression for XOR is totally wrong and nobody noticed??? Thats XNOR, can you guys really pay some attention?
![CMOS Example [Inv(A+B*C)*C+D]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y2y2evaLys4/mqdefault.jpg)
This video is part of the second course of our *ElectrONiX* massive open online course (MOOC) series.
You can sign up for the course *ElectrONiX - Digital* for free on the following link: imoox.at/course/digital
ElectrONiX MOOC series: imoox.at/series/electronix
Simple and clear! Very high quality material
Thank you for the nice feedback :)
We are glad you like it.
Great video! Thank you very much.
We are glad you like it.
Thanks great explaining ❤
Thank you very much for this
You're welcome :)
nice explain 🙏
We are glad you liked it :)
Great video! But at 8:34, why do you use the conjunctive minimal form (since you're looking at the zeros), but then multiply ('and') the variables and separate the terms with a '+' ('or')? I learned it's the other way around. And my other question is: at 9:29, you took the solution from the Karnaugh map for Y and randomly created a Y dash out of it without inverting the terms so that the equation remains correct. I would appreciate a quick response because my test is on Tuesday :D Thank you!
in the last example, did you serialize the two paths (1: A(B+CD) 2: C'(BD+A'B'D') ) when turning into pull up? I think they remained parallel in your representation
agree
wow nice video
Nice video bu where is the examples solution for the 3 variables?
Can't you just put one inverter at the end instead of one per input?
finally someone that isnt indian (no offense but i dont understand the indians)
Exactly my thought lol. Why are there so few electronics tutorials from non-indians? So strange.
You guys keep thanking below the comment section without really paying any attention? The truth table and logical expression for XOR is totally wrong and nobody noticed??? Thats XNOR, can you guys really pay some attention?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XOR_gate
wow nice video