2019 Porsche Macan 2.0 245 hp - Sensible Porsche? (ENG) - Test Drive and Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 бер 2019
  • Porsche Macan is the German sports car manufacturer's most popular model. Not the 911. The 2019 Porsche Macan was given a face lift, which includes some new headlights, colors, wheel design, and a less powerful 2.0 litre engine to meet emission standards. Two litres are nothing extraordinary in the SUV segment, but is it enough for a Porsche?
    Starting price: 60 000 euro
    As tested: ~85 000 euro
    Also watch:
    Jaguar i-Pace • Jaguar i-Pace (ENG) - ...
    Jaguar F-Pace • Jaguar F-Pace (ENG) - ...
    BMW X4 • 2019 BMW X4 G02 (ENG) ...
    BMW X3 • 2018 BMW X3 G01 (ENG) ...
    Porsche Macan • (ENG) Porsche Macan S ...
    Porsche Panamera • Porsche Panamera Turbo...
    Alfa Romeo Stelvio • Alfa Romeo Stelvio 280...
    Range Rover Velar • Range Rover Velar Luxu...
    Mercedes-Benz GLC • Mercedes-Benz GLC 350e...
    Volvo XC60 • Volvo XC60 2018 (ENG) ...
    Follow me:
    www.wieruszewski.com
    marekdrives
    @mwieruszewski
    marek_drives
    #MarekDrives #Porsche #PorscheMacan
    Thanks for watching Marek Drives reviews. If you liked it, here are several other channels you may enjoy: Autophorie, Autogefühl, Bob Flavin, Carfection, Doug DeMuro, Driven Car Reviews, TheSmokingTire, TheStraightPipes.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 186

  • @renzog1237
    @renzog1237 5 років тому +30

    “Not everyone wants to feel like a Lemans racer” then proceeds to complain it’s not a Lemans racer 😂

  • @MarekDrives
    @MarekDrives 4 роки тому

    Filmed with Panasonic Lumix GH4: amzn.to/2WIVgoL
    DJI Phantom4: amzn.to/2ZqUWaT
    and Insta360 One X amzn.to/2WI5EwX
    Edited on MacBook Pro: amzn.to/31zYWrR
    And my sunglasses, because some of you are asking Ray-Ban Justin: amzn.to/2WrSlvE
    (The above are affliliate links. If you buy products through them I get a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thanks!)

  • @9fiveb180
    @9fiveb180 5 років тому +31

    Are you seriously complaining about be keyless entry having a twist key instead of a push button when it performs the same function?
    It's also built that way because when the vehicle battery dies and you have to use the slide-out emergency key to enter the vehicle to jump start it, or if the battery dies in the key fob, you'll just pull that twist ignition key out and put your dead key fob into that space and be able to start the car. Saving you from having to call roadside assistance, which sometimes could take hours depending on where you are.
    Duh

  • @garym7607
    @garym7607 5 років тому +74

    Some professional reviewers have suggested that the base model handles better than the S because the engine, which is ahead of the front axle, is considerably lighter. Also, reviewers recognize that driving in the U.S. (where I live) doesn't offer much opportunity for high speed acceleration. The S sells for a considerable premium over the base (never mind the engine options above the S), and I don't believe you've made the case to reach that much deeper into my pocket.

    • @renzog1237
      @renzog1237 5 років тому +6

      Add a tuner to the 2.0 and you have a more trackable Macan for 8k less than the S.

    • @bak2mb
      @bak2mb 3 роки тому

      @@Bunzachi does it void the warranty? thanks

    • @SebastianStll
      @SebastianStll 2 роки тому

      @@Bunzachi i just got my macan, if i get the apr tune my warranty will get affected?

  • @slam44
    @slam44 2 роки тому +5

    I love the sound of a strained 4 cylinder high revving.

  • @yellowsheep1163
    @yellowsheep1163 3 роки тому +4

    Haha so much honesty and unbiased ! Love it.

  • @wieslawmachala6664
    @wieslawmachala6664 5 років тому +1

    Czesc panie Marku. Question.
    What is the difference in engine output between turbu and gts.

  • @taffymarsden
    @taffymarsden 5 років тому +23

    it's no coincidence that so many reviews now are rating the four as the best version. If the reviewer has reached the point of complaining that bottles stand to tall in the cup holder when there is a dedicated bottle holder in the door, I'm not sure he's a reliable reviewer.

    • @aammssaamm
      @aammssaamm 5 років тому +4

      This bottle complaint is really rediculous :)

    • @rc666
      @rc666 3 роки тому

      @@aammssaamm it' s not

    • @aammssaamm
      @aammssaamm 3 роки тому

      @@rc666 It is. You just don't own Macan.

  • @slinky702
    @slinky702 2 роки тому

    Thank u for the great video. Best honest video for this vehicle on UA-cam.

  • @mogsyman
    @mogsyman 5 років тому +8

    Good review - We are just about to take delivery of a 2.0L Macan fully loaded (ex-demo) however it’s only used on the school run and I am lucky enough yo have an F90 M5 for everyday gut-wrenching acceleration! I suspect if you weren’t aware there was a V6 350bhp engine available you would be happy regardless and let’s face it, come 2022 when all cars in Europe must abide by the speed limit it’s all pretty irrelevant anyway!

    • @medi2776
      @medi2776 3 роки тому

      mogsyman okay richass

    • @thechosenoneneo
      @thechosenoneneo 2 роки тому

      How is your m5 keeping has it had any issues as I was also looking at the m5 f90 model around 2019 plate but was worried about the reliability.

  • @TheDansen30
    @TheDansen30 5 років тому +12

    Kind of funny, 4 piston calipers braked and couldn't stop.... So what happen to those SUV with 1 piston? And many are worrying about the size of the engine. 6.1 sec is not slow for a SUV. Many professional reviewers said they couldn't tell the different between base vs S for normal driving.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      In traffic all cars are the same. Unless you need want to change lane fast, and need to accelerate. Once this is up to speed, it feels the same, as the V6. But as I said, it's a heavy car, and it needs all the stopping power it can get.

    • @patrickcloutier1571
      @patrickcloutier1571 3 роки тому +2

      This review is a real joke

  • @litespeed65
    @litespeed65 4 роки тому +1

    The 2020 Base Macan in Canada is $57800.
    Those RS wheels in the video aren't even an option, but adding the largest wheels available- the 20" Macan Turbo wheels as your ONLY option already adds $4790 bringing the price up to $63,880.
    You haven't added a single other option and you now equal the base price of the MB GLC 43 AMG and that has a Twin turbo V-6 with 385 HP.

  • @NotCommanderShepard
    @NotCommanderShepard 4 роки тому +2

    I'm left handed. In a world where everything is catered to right handed people, I love the fact that Porsche has that feature...even though it is for a completely irrelevant reason.

  • @davedesmond1713
    @davedesmond1713 5 років тому +27

    Marek, don't be so negative on the 2.0L engine. Yes it is a VW or Audi Q engine but so what. If you want a Porsche designed engine than buy the 3.0L. I've driven both Base and the S models and really there wasn't that much difference in performance...yes if you want Porsche Sound get the S. But you must realize the Base Macan is Porsche's biggest seller which means Porsche is expanding its customer base...business is business! Thanks!

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      Don't forget this is a heavy car. Standing start may feel similar, but Macan S has the power and especially torque to accelerate, when you're already on the go.

    • @bak2mb
      @bak2mb 3 роки тому +2

      owned an older S and now drive a2020 Base....happy with both!!

    • @Itsme-vo4fx
      @Itsme-vo4fx 2 роки тому +1

      @@MarekDrives So, who cares when you’re urban driving. I live in a city. That’s why I don’t drive a Ferrari (just half serious).

  • @tstabswf
    @tstabswf 5 років тому +1

    I notice that rear light bar brighter and dimmer intermittent, is it something that done by intention or just an effect of LED pulsation duty cycle with camera?

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      LED + camera frame rate.

    • @tstabswf
      @tstabswf 5 років тому

      @@MarekDrives Thank you.

  • @vvp1002
    @vvp1002 5 років тому +1

    Marek, nice You look finally recovery......How many Macans at the roads in a Poland? Is it popular?

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      Not many. Rich Poles prefer Cayennes.

    • @vvp1002
      @vvp1002 5 років тому

      thus a question- who's a target group for Macan? Women?

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому

      I don't know, but according to Porsche sales data Macan is their best selling model worldwide.

    • @cbatiau2528
      @cbatiau2528 5 років тому

      @@vvp1002 Women don't buy Porsches much... mostly men... Women buy Volvo, BMW, Mercedes, Land Rover, etc.

  • @JD-ny6pc
    @JD-ny6pc 4 роки тому +1

    Hello, I need to decide between the Macan S and the X3 M40I. Which one is better for responsiveness and short lag time? Thanks.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 4 роки тому +2

      Porsche.

    • @JD-ny6pc
      @JD-ny6pc 4 роки тому

      Hello again,Thanks for your quick reply. I appreciate it since I need to make a decision on the cars mentioned above this week.Would you say that the Macan S, without the sport chrono package, will respond better when you need to do a quick acceleration from low speed? (For example, if you are at stop sign and you need to take off very quickly, or if you are entering a highway and you need to raise your speed very quickly, or when you need to do a quick takeover manoeuvre.) Thanks. Enjoyed your video.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 4 роки тому

      I'd say don't take Porsche without Sport Chrono, unless you plan on driving it in Sport mode all the time.

  • @gregorytrane7828
    @gregorytrane7828 5 років тому +6

    Thanks for the honest review. The next generation electric Macon is going to be a wash in my opinion and not in the true spirit of the European sport car tradition.

  • @SkippyPB.
    @SkippyPB. 3 роки тому +4

    The guy is obviously comparing this to the Macan S and Macan turbo. While the two higher trim levels offer more performance, He fails to mention as to why people buy the regular Macan is the price point. Not everyone Needs to go a second faster. Not everyone needs a different exhaust sound. This base Macan checks all the boxes that most folks ail ever need. He’s obviously nit picking at every minor detail that he doesn’t seem fit.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 3 роки тому +1

      Actually I said this is sort of a replacement for the diesel Macan, which is for the more laid back owner, who doesn't need top performance. I also said it's just as good in traffic as any other Porsche, and that it sensible enough most of the time. My only 2 problems are lack of responsiveness if you don't use the sport response mode, and (IMO) insufficiently powerful brakes. This is a heavy, and relatively fast car, so it could use better brakes. If that is nitpicking, then perhaps you should go watch one of those dealer videos, that tell you only what's good on the new (insert whatever they have on stock).

    • @rustyme1122
      @rustyme1122 3 роки тому +1

      @@MarekDrives I have a 2017 base and always drive in sport mode. I recently had the dealer install sport plus. A very nice upgrade for when I want even better performance. You know like when every other pesky 4 cylinder 5 passenger SUV comes around thinking they can keep up. The poor braking performance was upgraded by getting rid of the stock Porsche organic brake pads. Still not as good as 6 piston calipers but very noticeably improved. The exhaust note is pretty weak but the vehicle is very quiet and a pleasure to drive on the highway. All in all I love my base.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 3 роки тому

      @@rustyme1122 I suppose with the upgrades it makes sense. Did you buy it new or second hand?

    • @rustyme1122
      @rustyme1122 3 роки тому

      @@MarekDrives I bought it new. Ordered it from a build sheet. It has quite a lot of options for a base.

  • @boiliveson3015
    @boiliveson3015 5 років тому +2

    I liked the old one but I think I like the q5 or velar more but this is a nice car

    • @intotheunknown6523
      @intotheunknown6523 3 роки тому +2

      I'm the other way around. I like the macan over the velar and audi. Only reason I would choose velar over the porsche is for the awesome entertainment system

  • @user-xk5so7wb2t
    @user-xk5so7wb2t 3 роки тому +4

    2L is Plenty for everyday driving. Traffic, most everywhere Rarely allows you to really Open up and feel/see the raw power.
    Plus the huge difference in gas Mileage & the multi 3L engine issues....
    So really a waste of Money, Unless you have more money then sense....

    • @bak2mb
      @bak2mb 3 роки тому +2

      so true..had to choose between a more $$ '18 GTS with 38K miles and a 2020 base with 21" Spyder wheels with only 10K miles and CPO till 11/26...went with the base and worry free for the next 6 yrs lol

  • @andersemanuel
    @andersemanuel 5 років тому +2

    I would love to see you review the 992. Any plans?

  • @sushantdas7
    @sushantdas7 5 років тому +2

    Nice car

  • @numbereightyseven
    @numbereightyseven 4 роки тому +1

    First time seeing your work. Wonderful dry humour

  • @wilsonksixonetour
    @wilsonksixonetour 5 років тому +4

    Hello Marek Drives
    ,
    Are you planning to drive also a Macan S to help us with the engine feeling differences?
    Thank you! :)

    • @swanblake
      @swanblake 5 років тому +1

      I mean if you ever drove a Golf R with an extra 200 lbs, it's alot like that

  • @AStick3Pedals
    @AStick3Pedals 5 років тому +7

    The pre-facelift sounds so much better!

  • @Paul-if1jq
    @Paul-if1jq 4 роки тому +3

    The 2.0 is a Vw GTi engine...

  • @johnthegamer7529
    @johnthegamer7529 5 років тому +1

    *Whats real fuel consumption in city ?*
    *Can anyone tell me that info ?*

  • @adammarkowitz7944
    @adammarkowitz7944 5 років тому +1

    Well done, and funny, review, sir. Thank you.

  • @racekar80
    @racekar80 4 роки тому +3

    Sorry I don’t agree, I have had both the base and the S loaners when I took my 911 in for service. The S is has a much smoother power delivery.

    • @bak2mb
      @bak2mb 3 роки тому

      agree...had the S and now a base...

  • @weezeraddoil
    @weezeraddoil 5 років тому +2

    All true . so true . best review ever on the Internet .

  • @BadGreekMofo
    @BadGreekMofo 5 років тому +5

    I hope they come out with a plug in hybrid before they go all electric!

  • @kevinn1158
    @kevinn1158 5 років тому +16

    A VW Golf GTI engine in a vehicle that costs 2.5-3 GTIs. Cue the Porsche snob justification. I love your honest comments Marek! Keep it up!

    • @scratchy996
      @scratchy996 5 років тому +9

      This car is great. It is the car you buy for your trophy wife, so she can be happy she drives a Porsche. It's slow enough so she doesn't get into trouble, the taxes and insurance are also cheaper, so you can pay for her Zumba classes.

    • @pavelderyagin5099
      @pavelderyagin5099 5 років тому

      @@scratchy996 Buys a car that is worth 85k because of the badge and is thinking about taxes and insurance :D nice logic

    • @pavelderyagin5099
      @pavelderyagin5099 5 років тому +3

      You know that both Golf and Porsche is VAG owned, right ?

    • @kevinn1158
      @kevinn1158 5 років тому +4

      @@pavelderyagin5099 Yes I do. And your point? If Porsche is so special, why didn't they use their own 4 cylinder with more hp? Or even put the 300hp version of this engine in the vehicle? You really need to be a Porsche slappy to buy into this car.

    • @pavelderyagin5099
      @pavelderyagin5099 5 років тому +2

      @@kevinn1158 I am afraid that its not Porsche's decision, but VAG's :D

  • @luvhuangwen77
    @luvhuangwen77 5 років тому +2

    Nice comment

  • @robertdevoy3119
    @robertdevoy3119 5 років тому +1

    The problem is all these 2.0 ltr turbo fours are too small. Why don't they bump it up to 2.5 ltr for more horsepower and torque? This would keep the keen handling of the lighter engine. However, even with that the price of a properly outfitted Macan is a very poor value. Porsche should just stay out of the 4 cylinder arena and leave that to the less haloed name plates. With a proper tire upgrade I bet the Mazda CX-5 Signature with its 2.5 ltr turbo four could outperform this 2.0 ltr Macan.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +2

      Taxes. At least in Europe in many countries engines over 2L displacement are additionally taxed. So car manufacturers either offer a significantly larger engine to make it "worth it" or try to keep it up to 2L.

    • @cbatiau2528
      @cbatiau2528 5 років тому +4

      Porsche sells base 2-liter Macans at a rate/ratio of around 8-1 or 10-1 when compared to sales of Macan S and Macan Turbo combined. Base Macan is Porsche's bread and butter; it allows them to do lots with vehicles having larger engines, which they may not be able to do otherwise. Evidently tens of thousands of buyers are very happy that Porsche doesn't "just stay out of the 4 cylinder arena"!

    • @robertdevoy3119
      @robertdevoy3119 5 років тому

      @@MarekDrivesNever knew that. I was wondering why there were so many 2 ltr engines.

    • @robertdevoy3119
      @robertdevoy3119 5 років тому +1

      @@cbatiau2528 Personally, I would prefer the four cylinder for its lighter weight upfront. It's a shame, but apparently taxes stand in the way of a 2.5 ltr four.

    • @Helpmegodproductions
      @Helpmegodproductions 5 років тому

      It's all about the handling. Putting more power on most other compact SUV s is like putting lipstick on a pig. Used to be that 911s put out the same horsepower as today's base Macan.

  • @boiliveson3015
    @boiliveson3015 5 років тому

    Why did they put less power?

  • @swanblake
    @swanblake 5 років тому

    I have to wonder, if Audi, VW, Porsche, Lamburghi, ECT are all going electric, why buy one over the other? With no distinguishing engine, transmission, sound, driven wheels, ect., why buy a Porsche EV SUV vs a cheaper Audi EV SUV that have the same chassis? I mean handling is going to be very similar given the weight and batteries in the floor for center of gravity.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому

      Good question. Weight should eventually decrease with the development of more dense and/or smaller batteries. I would assume there is going to be even more electronic tuning to make the steering and suspension feel more like Porsche or more like Audi. On the one hand I can imagine VW Group guarding their secret recipes like KFC, and on the other I can imagine more opportunities for aftermarket tuning. All you need is a laptop.

    • @Itsme-vo4fx
      @Itsme-vo4fx 2 роки тому +1

      My choice over all those premium electric cars will depend on which one gives me the longest electric extension cord. If I’m going to drive 200 miles or so at a time, I will need quite a long cord.

    • @Rumblingbelly
      @Rumblingbelly Рік тому

      This is a question that Im wondering currently. Should I get Q6 e-tron or Macan EV. Will be interesting to see the specs. I have a suspicion that Q6 will be too heavy/slow/boring.

  • @jannevaatainen
    @jannevaatainen 5 років тому +1

    I think it's still better to have a not very exiting but real engine sound, than a fake one that some manufacturers use. Great music on this video, btw.!

  • @macdds
    @macdds Рік тому

    We should not talk about 0 to 60 time of any ICE vehicle, rather talk about the ride quality, handling, driving dynamics etc. I am a Porsche fan but have been driving an electric car (a little over 50k new car price) that has 500hp with 3.8 sec 0 to 60. Since then, I no longer even look at those numbers in ICE cars anymore.

  • @davehollingworth1241
    @davehollingworth1241 5 років тому +9

    Regards breaking porsche say what ever the 0 to 60 time is 60 to 0 is half that about 3.4 seconds !,,
    Just a a typical UA-cam review with no understanding of porsche can you argue with Porsche’s best selling vehicle beating the 911 and all others for sales or are we all wrong so many people just like the sound of there own voice and a UA-cam channel nothing of any real content here.

  • @m4st3rm1nd9
    @m4st3rm1nd9 5 років тому

    why no push button start?

  • @robtt997
    @robtt997 5 років тому +3

    Lardy suv like this needs a lot more power to be enjoyable and more importantly proper big brakes . The latter is inexcusable.

    • @davehollingworth1241
      @davehollingworth1241 5 років тому +1

      robert tulloch
      Porsche Macan 60mph to 0 3.3 Seconds
      Porsche 911. 60mph to 0 2.1 Seconds
      What is inexcusable a neck brace 🤔

  • @dalibormilic139
    @dalibormilic139 5 років тому

    Quick survey and be honest everybody : this or Alfa Romeo Stelvio with 280 hp ?
    And why ?

    • @scratchy996
      @scratchy996 5 років тому +2

      Mercedes GLC.
      The Alfa will disintegrate in a few km.

    • @dalibormilic139
      @dalibormilic139 5 років тому +3

      Oh the prejudice 😁 as they say in our country better to have alfa and look good on tow truck than bmw and drive ugly 😉
      As far as mercedes drivers are concerned mother tought me to be nice to senior citizens 😁

    • @cbatiau2528
      @cbatiau2528 5 років тому +6

      Macan looks way better inside and out... More reliable, too...

    • @dalibormilic139
      @dalibormilic139 5 років тому

      Jup also twice the price ... and half the fun ... with engine for the masses where is a premium appeal of porsche ... except in a badge

    • @lellomatera3870
      @lellomatera3870 3 роки тому

      Commonplaces about Alfa .

  • @g00dfeeling
    @g00dfeeling 5 років тому +13

    Valid comment for a fake key and its placement.

    • @user-jf8gd3lv7q
      @user-jf8gd3lv7q 5 років тому

      Shitty comment for a smart PORSCHE key and the absolutely idiotic critizism about this detail!
      Listen, you idiots: if you don't have a fucking clue about PORSCHEs "philosophy" of not having a stupid "starter button", like all the others have, then just shut the fuck up!

    • @timmccabe4654
      @timmccabe4654 5 років тому +1

      I have the fake key in our cayenne. Its just as easy and more appealing to use than the push button in our other car. It’s novel and feels more performance oriented.

  • @livingcolours1541
    @livingcolours1541 5 років тому

    Your fake key theory is incorrect.
    Has to do with the wiring. Noting to do with the race days.

    • @delboy2596
      @delboy2596 5 років тому +1

      Care to explain? ua-cam.com/video/Baas-Er7d9o/v-deo.html

    • @pavelderyagin5099
      @pavelderyagin5099 5 років тому

      @@delboy2596 HAHAHAHA :DDD good find. I wonder if that guy will answer

    • @livingcolours1541
      @livingcolours1541 5 років тому +1

      @@delboy2596 At the porsche museum, they say the left side switch let Dr Porsche use the shortest amount of wire, based on where the other components were attached to the firewall in the original 356 cars.
      Reply

    • @livingcolours1541
      @livingcolours1541 5 років тому

      @@pavelderyagin5099 I have answered. Don't need to think it's funny when it's factual.
      The fuse panel is still on the left so placement on the left is a slightly shorter wiring run. Less wire, less weight. Go to the Porsche museum for yourself if you think it's still funny.

  • @fahadalswailem3221
    @fahadalswailem3221 5 років тому

    Is there a turbo on the 2.0

  • @user-sr9un4kl5q
    @user-sr9un4kl5q 2 роки тому

    50k

  • @THIRSTCREAMtv
    @THIRSTCREAMtv 2 роки тому

    I’m 28 years old and this is a strange choice test drive it an it’s slow as hell it’s just nice looking an techy. If u want something faster op for a 2019 cayenne same price an u get 330 hp in the base version.

  • @ericj.rowland4393
    @ericj.rowland4393 5 років тому

    Copied Lincoln with the rear taillight strip

  • @soldierovaslan
    @soldierovaslan 5 років тому

    Sensible means czuły, rozsądny to reasonable!!!

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому

      www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sensible

  • @RyanZNO
    @RyanZNO 5 років тому +12

    God I hate the new taillight design they’re going with across all their vehicles now. Reminds me of a dodge 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @alliejr
    @alliejr 5 років тому +6

    Buy a Q5 if you don’t like the traditional Porsche key mechanism. The brand is not for you.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +4

      I like how Porsche handles.

    • @alliejr
      @alliejr 5 років тому +1

      Marek Drives Haha yes. No doubt. Just “poking” you. Great review.

  • @user-ib5ib2lf9r
    @user-ib5ib2lf9r 3 роки тому

    IMacanS GET

  • @user-bp6bs9vl7s
    @user-bp6bs9vl7s 4 роки тому +2

    เอาสีน้ำเงินคันนี้ครับชอบมากเลยครับให้เปลี่ยนใจแล้วครับ

  • @cbatiau2528
    @cbatiau2528 5 років тому

    Regarding the fake key: yeah, I hate that, but in the base Macan you get a real key-ignition: you put the key fob in that location and turn it, as normal; your model has the keyless entry *option*, which you have to pay for -- and there is a UA-cam video for how you can take out that "fake key" so that you can insert your key fob normally, if you so desire.
    As for the price: 60k Euros is too much for this; here in America, our base price is only USD $50k, which translates to 44.5k Euros -- much cheaper! I would pay 44.5k Euros for this new base Macan, but not 60k Euros for it! Even with taxes here, it only comes to 47k Euros. I would love to know why there is such a big difference between the same vehicle sold in Europe vs. America.
    Two things that I hadn't noticed in the new Macan are the fake intake "vents" below the headlights and the weaker brakes -- disappointing. But I have driven both the Macan S and base Macan for model year 2018 (the previous "generation"), and I was unimpressed by the Macan S, which did not feel all that powerful and which has much worse gas mileage; I thought that the base Macan is a better buy for the money (sold here in base form for $10k less than the S).

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому

      Yes, I know you can take out the faux key and use the fob instead.
      As for the price difference, there's a hefty VAT on everything in Europe. Depending on the country its between 17 and 27 (!!!!) percent. So if we take US price 47k+19% VAT for Germany (I use German prices in my English reviews) we get about 56k, which is much closer to what you'd have to pay. The rest may result in differences in base specification across markets, probably some volume discounts, as US is one of the largest Porsche markets, etc.

    • @jeffs6090
      @jeffs6090 5 років тому

      I'd just prefer a push button like a normal car has these days. I get the heritage, but let's move on Porsche. Key fobs remain in the pocket now and push a button.

    • @cbatiau2528
      @cbatiau2528 5 років тому

      @@jeffs6090 I prefer inserting a key/fob into an "ignition" switch and turning... The new keyless-entry and keyless-start systems have been shown to be very vulnerable to hacking. And putting the key in an ignition switch gives you a place to have the key while you are in the car only, so you don't forget to shut the engine and lock the car when you leave. It seems pretty lazy to me to want this keyless entry and keyless start stuff in cars, and much more inherently dangerous. (Also, I can't imagine that Porsche will have anything but keyless entry/ignition with their forthcoming EVs; they're already there in their E-Hybrids. But I suspect there will be much more potential for hacking BEVs with keyless everything because they are silent -- you won't hear an engine coming on as the hackers drive away with your car.)

  • @AE-bk8tc
    @AE-bk8tc 3 роки тому

    Pre judgment review. Buy a hyundai.

  • @telemetryz
    @telemetryz 5 років тому

    Say no to bohunks.

  • @alex__2428
    @alex__2428 5 років тому +2

    Arrogant European review

    • @TassieLorenzo
      @TassieLorenzo 4 роки тому

      It's an arrogant European car, an Audi Q5 in a fancy suit...

    • @olasek7972
      @olasek7972 3 роки тому +1

      Alex __ you are arrogant

  • @jinxed_jinxed_3443
    @jinxed_jinxed_3443 5 років тому +1

    Well if it goes like stink, then i guess it should sound like shit :D

  • @sirp194
    @sirp194 5 років тому +1

    why not just get audi q5 if not buying the s? lol

    • @aammssaamm
      @aammssaamm 5 років тому +3

      It looks ugly.

    • @taffymarsden
      @taffymarsden 5 років тому +6

      The Porsche has a tweaked engine, Seven speed pdk box, Porsche steering, suspension and brakes and (despite how nice the Audi is) is better built. Best value suv on the market.

    • @sirp194
      @sirp194 5 років тому +2

      @@taffymarsdenThank you much for the info. Im assuming it holds its value better than a audi, bmw, or mercedes

    • @renzog1237
      @renzog1237 5 років тому +2

      The Q5 shares only about 30% of its parts with the Macan. Mainly the chassis

  • @minniesaab7255
    @minniesaab7255 5 років тому

    👍🏻🚘

  • @morganvon5664
    @morganvon5664 2 роки тому +1

    This sounds like the worst vehicle ever made. How does Porsche stay in business?

  • @joeyatwaini
    @joeyatwaini 5 років тому +4

    that tail light is so ugly. why did they do it????

  • @BillyNoMates1974
    @BillyNoMates1974 5 років тому +1

    This is just the start of tree hugging lefty feel good making the rules on cars.
    But why oh why stick a Porsche badge on a 2.0l car ?
    what next a 0.9l Renault engined Porche for urban running around.
    Aston Martin done that with the Cygnet and that didn't work out too well.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      Cygnet was an overpriced Toyota. I think it was a bad choice for badge engineering. The car itself was an interesting concept.

    • @BillyNoMates1974
      @BillyNoMates1974 5 років тому

      @@MarekDrives I agree the toyota was an interesting concept even if it was known as the washing machine(short upright stance)

    • @christophercurson8299
      @christophercurson8299 4 роки тому +2

      Porsche 356, 550 Spyder, the 1957 718, 904, 912, 914, 924, 944, 968 and even the 919 hybrid Le Mans racer had 4 cylinder engines. Engines sizes ranging from 1.1 litres to 2.5 litres. Many were VW / Audi sourced too. The very first Porsche - the type 64 had a 1 litre flat 4 engine, so it’s safe to say small 4 cylinder engines are in Porsche DNA. The latest 718 Cayman and Boxster use 2 litre flat fours too....guess that’s why Porsche think it’s fine to stick a Porsche badge on a 2.0 litre car.

  • @aliancemd
    @aliancemd 5 років тому

    Shitting on it the entire video...

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +1

      Yes, that great Porsche handling is an insult.

    • @joesmoe8983
      @joesmoe8983 5 років тому

      Marek Drives The bad far out weighed the good ass wipe.

  • @slimpickering1699
    @slimpickering1699 5 років тому +10

    What a strange, cynical review. Generally useless. Some people want this car and would like to hear from someone satisfied with the overall package. That's clearly not this guy.

    • @TassieLorenzo
      @TassieLorenzo 4 роки тому

      Well it's a pointless, cynical car... Designed to make money and nothing else.

  • @mkkm945
    @mkkm945 5 років тому +1

    Soon to be irrelevant. Tesla Model Y launching in the coming week with more power and less shitty sound. Audi just showed us a Q4-etron and even Porsche says they are electrifying it. It's almost as if they hope some suckers buy now to give them some money while they take their time developing the next generation one.

    • @renzog1237
      @renzog1237 5 років тому +1

      MK KM The only way Tesla sells any vehicles is due to state subsidies. I don’t see any here in Nevada.

  • @daryls357
    @daryls357 6 місяців тому

    Pessimistic Paul

  • @garyhsu9935
    @garyhsu9935 5 років тому

    so underpowered. you can get a camry with more hp.

    • @MarekDrives
      @MarekDrives 5 років тому +2

      But why would you want a Camry in the first place? :)

    • @taffymarsden
      @taffymarsden 5 років тому

      Hilarious. If you get to pick, which one will you go for :)

    • @bak2mb
      @bak2mb 3 роки тому

      @@taffymarsden lol good one

  • @davidplon9215
    @davidplon9215 5 років тому

    I personally would never buy a 2.0 liter Macan with 245 hp! This is a heavy car and needs some grunt to accelerate and pass plus if you drive with heavy right foot like me I wouldn't be happy. My guess is a grocery hauler and schlepping the kids to soccer games than I guess it's fine or you want to that Porsche badge on the hood. Anyone who like performance ain't buying this because there are other cheaper suv's with more power that you can get into for less.

    • @rustyme1122
      @rustyme1122 3 роки тому +1

      And every cheaper SUV with more power drive like shit in comparison.

  • @garyhsu9935
    @garyhsu9935 5 років тому

    porsche is such a ripoff brand.

    • @xcvxcvcxvxvcq
      @xcvxcvcxvxvcq 5 років тому

      Why you say that?

    • @joesmoe8983
      @joesmoe8983 5 років тому

      You just don’t own one, my little 718 is a blast😁😁😁

    • @gregspicer2091
      @gregspicer2091 4 роки тому

      Gary Jelly Belly Hsu

  • @antonyoantonyo7005
    @antonyoantonyo7005 2 роки тому

    Try another job.

  • @garyhsu9935
    @garyhsu9935 5 років тому +1

    2L is a joke