the 3 liters t macan it's faster on th 0 to 100 of hal second than to 200 they are more or less same time. 200 kilos less worth 90hp. weird , don't u think so??
@@ripdiptatterchip3851 more like 6 seconds. The acceleration started at 0:02, and 100 was reached at 0:08. Seconds are not as quick as y’all think patna trust me.
That's about the same as my Toyota Blade Master - a 2007 Corolla body with the Lexus / Highlander 3.5-litre 206kW V6. 0 to 180 in 18 or 19 seconds. (The Blade has a 180km/hr limiter, being JDM). Still, the Blade costs less than one-tenth of one of these Macans.
0-100 : 5.9sec, 100-200 : 20sec.
Very good performance for a 4L in a such heavy car.
ʎɯɐᗡ 2 liter
@@hacker007300 Yes, i've mean "4 cylinders in Line".
Top
Focus ST numbers literally. 252Hp.
Vw engine ?
the 3 liters t macan it's faster on th 0 to 100 of hal second than to 200 they are more or less same time. 200 kilos less worth 90hp. weird , don't u think so??
Do you have SPORT PLUS or PSE (exhaust)?
Alex Dinca 👎🏻
No
how many secs? and do u have sport exhaust or sport chrono
7-8 seconds
@@ripdiptatterchip3851 more like 6 seconds. The acceleration started at 0:02, and 100 was reached at 0:08. Seconds are not as quick as y’all think patna trust me.
it's alright to do that once in a blue moon. Keep doing that and you will fork out money for a brand new PDK gearbox
224)
That's about the same as my Toyota Blade Master - a 2007 Corolla body with the Lexus / Highlander 3.5-litre 206kW V6.
0 to 180 in 18 or 19 seconds. (The Blade has a 180km/hr limiter, being JDM).
Still, the Blade costs less than one-tenth of one of these Macans.
but yours is dreadful Toyota. Absolute piece of shit FYI.
But your Toyota is a useless piece of shit. Acceleration maybe is the same. But yours sucks in all other areas.
No, id still get the 6 cylinder version if I had the money, it sounds far better.
100-200 24 sec omg
its not porsche))
It’s 20sec.
bu yaxsi cekmir