Both are whack jobs. It is amazing how much patience the Judge has dealing with such characters. Seriously I would lose my patience dealing with such people. Hats off to the judge really.
lol. you going to get a lawyer to draw up a contract for a 500 dollar job when the lawyer charges 500? you do realize that a simple note is a contract but is not a sound contract which means that based on the wording and not terms and conditions, I can easily get out of a contract. Most people are not smart enough to draw up a contract because all contract has terms and conditions to protect the person who is drafting the contract and not so much for the person recieving the contract... Also all contracts must have a start and end date otherwise it can not be enforced but I bet you didnt know that but here you are passing judgment on things you are not educated about. There is a reason most lawyers work involves contract and contract disputes even when drafted by attorneys
He said "colorization" lol, no one who works in film would say that, it's called color correction. That, plus when he said that a 20 min short film with an amateur writer/Director wouldn't be that much work?! This guy is a fraud. Not that the defendant is much better, lol. If you can't afford to pay professional crew members, you might as well shoot it on an iPhone, not ask for "volunteers"
She wanted a lot for free and didn't make eye contact with the judge. She was looking everywhere but straight ahead. I'm wondering who those guys were with her. She seemed nuts to me.
the plaintiff is a total tool. with the backtalk he gave the judge I’m surprised she didn’t kick him out. and why is he suing for an extra 2 grand when their deal was $500? he’s definitely shady
LOL - If this guy was a janitor, he'd say he's a "sanitation engineer." If she was a paralegal, she'd call herself an "experienced attorney." They are both self-inflated, fast-talking and grandiose. I can't. 😂😂😂😂
Not only do you have 2 of the most annoying people on the planet in this case.. you also have a dude in the back that can't stop shaking his head. ffs - I couldn't wait for this to end lol
so, women arent strong enough to hold a door open they need a man to do it? cmon now.. by the way, you didnt notice he has a walking stick, dont be ableist.
I couldn’t believe the plaintiff interrupted JM and saying something like she didn’t let him speak, wow, he did do a lot of talking, and even tho she ruled in his favor, he still seemed upset bc he wasn’t allowed to talk anymore. What a dushe bag
Often the losing party complains to Doug in the hall that she didn't let them speak. Looks like the plaintiff thought he was going to lose and couldn't control himself until the hall interview. The judge even pointed out to him that she was about to rule in his favor.
Meaning he is on disability, when on disability if you make over so much, they take your disability away. So people do work under the table, so the government doesn't know about the money, which is illegal. She was just pointing out that he was scamming.
Both the plaintiff and defendant were both self centered and entitled in my opinion. That’s why they didn’t get along at all; they’re too much alike. Kudos for Judge M. for always being professional and spot on regarding her rulings
13:20 This is why I love Judge Mathis and Judy. After that comment both of them would’ve stood up and said verdict for the defendant! They would not stand still for that type of disrespect!
She now has to pay $500 for his footage. Now he's being ridiculous after the verdict saying, "if she uses any of it she will need to credit him blah blah blah OR they will end up back in court" ... dude, let it go already. Let this be a lesson learned. Next time use a contract that spells out all the details.
@@claraesparza7030. Exactly + the fact he didn't want to send her stuff as she wanted , but wanted her to come over and ... "Work together in his home" 🥴 Creep !
The guy in the back shaking his head whenever they said something unbelievable like "I don't have the facebook post" , "my script is registered with WGA" was the MVP!
WHAT? I don't understand why he won anything at all, he held the video hostage and she thought her only way of obtaining it was by agreeing to pay for it and then when she realised she wasn't going to be getting it, cancelled the cheque. So why did the judge order her to pay his full ransom in order to get an unfinished version? This is so wrong on so many levels. If he had kidnapped a child would the judge order the parent to pay the ransom just because they had agreed to, to get their child back?...
More than likely the agreement that they made was made before the hostage situation. He probably demanded more money before he gave it back to her. That’s where the misunderstanding is for me they didn’t really clear that part up…
There is something wrong with both of them! She seems like she’s a couple french fries short of a happy meal and he seems like a manipulative jerk! Best of luck to both of them!! 🤪
6:58 I can't one bit blame Judge Milian for getting exasperated with these two. They are definitely childish, and IMO are not material people for working in the movie industry.
I love it when one of the litigants comes in dragging a cane, a walker, or even in a wheelchair that they clearly don't need, in order to try and get that sympathy vote from JM.
They do tht @ the "pain specialist " you see them walking normal in parking lot then they get close to door they start leaning & moaning using their canes& walkers it's hilarious 😅😂😅😮 but it kinda makes me mad it hurts real patients with pain issues
Defendant acts like Amber Heard and looks like Paris Hilton all rolled into one, but this wasn't a criminal case and she's not a victim. She and the plaintiff are both off the charts. 🙄
The point the guy made during the interview at the end was the killer. She didn't have a written agreement with the guy that his services were a work-made-for-hire so he still owns the copyright to his work.
I'm not sure I believe the plaintiff. He is a piece of work! However, the defendant is irritating in her mannerisms and body language. I don't believe her either, and she isn't poised enough to do stand-up. Absolutely no eye contact with JM. Plaintiff is sweating big time 😄 The communication between the two of them is so immature. JM hit that nail on the head. I wish JM had told her she doesn't have to bend forward to speak into the mic.
She did a lot of leaning forward speaking into the mic as if she was a cashier at Walmart or worked at McDonald's. Maybe she was trying not to look so nervous. I don't know.
He thought he was going to lose so he said you have not let me talk lol, that's the judge on the pc she yells at you so much you don't know which way she's going, even though she already knew who was going to win before sitting down she makes it look like a jerry springer show and the crazy lady didn't help.
I literally just turned 30. Planned a whole wedding this year pretty much on my own. And even I know that you need to get EVERYTHING IN WRITING !!! Who expects that a verbal contract is enough these days ???
... anyone know if that footage ever saw the light of day. I would love to see the $500 project so self-important and indulgent that two lunatics went on daytime television to squabble over it. I bet it's bad... REAL bad... like, The Room bad...
That plaintiff was creepy as hell. I wouldn't go to his house alone either after he called her a prostitute. Then he called her "hun". Did you see the way the judge looked at him and raised her eyebrows? I've had narcissist boyfriends before and they acted just like him.
both are pretending to be more than what they are
That's showbiz, kid!
Exactly
😂😂😂
That’s it in a nutshell! Nailed it!!
😂😂
"Are you off your meds again?" 😂
THEY BOTH ARE OFF THEIR MEDS.
Be careful of what makes you laugh. 🙏🏾
The defendant is definitely off her meds in court lol.
When a case is over 13 minutes, you know it's going to be good
Period! 😅
Yes 🍿
Yep, if it's anything less, I don't bother watching it.
Both are whack jobs. It is amazing how much patience the Judge has dealing with such characters. Seriously I would lose my patience dealing with such people. Hats off to the judge really.
She gets paid really well to deal with goofy people.
She’s on $500,000 a year to sit through cases. It’s a TV show.
👏🏽 💯
Love these professionals who don't use contracts.
Ikr
lol. you going to get a lawyer to draw up a contract for a 500 dollar job when the lawyer charges 500?
you do realize that a simple note is a contract but is not a sound contract which means that based on the wording and not terms and conditions, I can easily get out of a contract. Most people are not smart enough to draw up a contract because all contract has terms and conditions to protect the person who is drafting the contract and not so much for the person recieving the contract...
Also all contracts must have a start and end date otherwise it can not be enforced but I bet you didnt know that but here you are passing judgment on things you are not educated about. There is a reason most lawyers work involves contract and contract disputes even when drafted by attorneys
If all that work is deemed worth $500 by the plaintiff, then he must not have that much experience in doing what he claims is his livelihood.
He said it was worth over two thousand the amount he sued for but they agreed to $500.
He's on disability
Plaintiff is a complete jerk. And the defendant is crazy
He said "colorization" lol, no one who works in film would say that, it's called color correction.
That, plus when he said that a 20 min short film with an amateur writer/Director wouldn't be that much work?! This guy is a fraud.
Not that the defendant is much better, lol. If you can't afford to pay professional crew members, you might as well shoot it on an iPhone, not ask for "volunteers"
He expected being payed in another form .
The defendant does not strike me as someone who would be good at stand up comedy.
😂😂😂😂 yea I can see that,😂😂😂😂😂 but looks can be deceiving
Probably why she works for Claire's now lol.
If course she sucks at comedy, she's a conservative.
Just in being loud = “funny”
She wanted a lot for free and didn't make eye contact with the judge. She was looking everywhere but straight ahead. I'm wondering who those guys were with her. She seemed nuts to me.
the plaintiff is a total tool. with the backtalk he gave the judge I’m surprised she didn’t kick him out. and why is he suing for an extra 2 grand when their deal was $500? he’s definitely shady
Geez. Tool was the first word I immediately thought of when he was talking to Doug in the hallway. Absolute perfection description for him.
I agree. At 13:12 he muttered over the Judge "wow I didn't get to talk"... she told him "no money for pain and suffering in a contract case".
She is also a tool because she said that disabled people aren't supposed to make a lot of money.
@@Clara-cp7oh When did he say that?
He performed a service and should be paid.......
LOL - If this guy was a janitor, he'd say he's a "sanitation engineer." If she was a paralegal, she'd call herself an "experienced attorney." They are both self-inflated, fast-talking and grandiose. I can't. 😂😂😂😂
i wonder if hes not the janitor who take a video of two women making it out in a toilet with a hidden camera, lol
that's kind of what everyone does on a resume
all padded nonsense to make it look more than what it really is
I prefer the title "Day Porter" for a janitor it's super fancy!!
Why is she staring at the wall and the ceiling half the time?
She's needs to be DRAMATIC.
Why do I not trust either party?
Because you are wiser than the both of them!
Because they are pretentious
Me either
No kidding
Cause they're both batshit 😂
Defendant is “nuts”!!! Plaintiff is a jerk!
That sums it up!
😂😂😂😂righttttt….the defendant is kinda abnoxious.
She also seems intoxicated. Sheesh.
and vice versa!
they both fit both descriptions IMO
That woman's mouth is HUGE! When she threw her head back laughing, 7:02. Frightening!
😂😂😂
😂😂😂 I didn't even notice I went back to see on purpose 😂😂😂😂 priceless 😂😂😂
frightening? more like inviting 😏
😭😭😭
Okkkkkkk😂😂😂
Defendant is talking to the ceiling, floor, chairs, podium but barely the Judge! Nutso!
Indeed…and the plaintiff is a nutty one himself.
That's an indication that she's lying. That's why Judge Judy makes all her litigants look at her in the eyes.
This woman is way too hyper
And narcissistic and manipulative
Looks high as a kite, and overly dramatic
Prob on drugs
Just a little....😂
No I think she has some kind of health problem
She scared me as soon as she opened her mouth.
Same here. Lol
I don't believe she was so scared of him, or of anyone. SHE is the scary one.
Not only do you have 2 of the most annoying people on the planet in this case.. you also have a dude in the back that can't stop shaking his head. ffs - I couldn't wait for this to end lol
😂
First thing I saw was plaintiff walking through the door not holding the door for the two women he brought with him.
so, women arent strong enough to hold a door open they need a man to do it? cmon now..
by the way, you didnt notice he has a walking stick, dont be ableist.
He was walking with a cane and his daughter or niece held the door for him.
I couldn’t believe the plaintiff interrupted JM and saying something like she didn’t let him speak, wow, he did do a lot of talking, and even tho she ruled in his favor, he still seemed upset bc he wasn’t allowed to talk anymore. What a dushe bag
Often the losing party complains to Doug in the hall that she didn't let them speak. Looks like the plaintiff thought he was going to lose and couldn't control himself until the hall interview. The judge even pointed out to him that she was about to rule in his favor.
imagine using him for a wedding, lol i think he will be a good vidio taker at a funeral, lol
@@BobBlumenfeld He was mad because he was suing for $2500 and only received $500, which to him was a loss.
These two belong together. Birds of a feather....
😂😂😂
They ahould get married and live happily ever after.
It’s crazy how people are ALWAYS claiming that they *”Never had a chance to talk”.* 🤦🏽♀️
Anybody else reminded of Amy's Bakery from Nightmare Kitchens?
😂 “The online haters and bullies”
Kitchen Nightmares* - not even Gordon Ramsay could help those people.
Meow meow
@@ConfusedinJuly OH!! You speak her language, too?
Yes!
500 bucks for all that work is a steal. They both seem crazy.
She was crazy for sure. He might just want to get laid.
Fr
She seems to be on something
Her affect suggests that she's "as dodgy as a nun with a machine gun". Guys should be very careful when dealing with women like her.
Defendant had a bit of a Janice Dickinson crazy vibe going on.
And some Sandra Bernhard.
She's all over the place.
“He’s disabled, he’s not supposed to make a lot of money”… excuse me, what?!
Meaning he is on disability, when on disability if you make over so much, they take your disability away. So people do work under the table, so the government doesn't know about the money, which is illegal. She was just pointing out that he was scamming.
@@michellehawkins1027so how does that entitle her to free work, to take advantage of his disability status
@@camellia8625 It doesn't, I just explained what was meant by the remark is all.
Why would people work for free for you, lady?? 🤔
I was thinking the same thing.
It's typical in small, indie projects to perform work gratis in exchange for exposure and resume-building.
They were both very weird. Strange personalities
I just want one of them to say “Ayeeee!!! Come on!! I’m walkin’ hea’!!” One time 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
5:27 😂😂 wow settle down woman!! She definitely forgot her meds this morning lol
Both the plaintiff and defendant were both self centered and entitled in my opinion. That’s why they didn’t get along at all; they’re too much alike. Kudos for Judge M. for always being professional and spot on regarding her rulings
Howie Mandel looks different with glasses.
#giggle
You do realize glasses are kind of Howie's thing, right?
That Blond is drunk or high
#both
I read her as autistic
This guy has a serious anger issue. And she is really high strung. Hope this give them both some comfort to be over.
Yeah he’s literally seething with rage
Wow, talk about arrogance!
She really thinks she’s something, a legend in her own mind. lol
"We were friends" "We BECAME friends" 🤣😂🤦🏾♀️
13:20 This is why I love Judge Mathis and Judy. After that comment both of them would’ve stood up and said verdict for the defendant!
They would not stand still for that type of disrespect!
Mathis is too sensitive! Judy is just a nut!
She follows the law not her feelings.
Follow the law, not your feelings
@@tesstickles1280hey hey hey no Judy slander lol😂
Judge Judy would have reduced them both to tears...
The defendant is such a loudmouth that she gets very little sympathy. That's a lot of work for $500.
It is, but he agreed to do it for free
The defendant is a man
She now has to pay $500 for his footage. Now he's being ridiculous after the verdict saying, "if she uses any of it she will need to credit him blah blah blah OR they will end up back in court" ... dude, let it go already. Let this be a lesson learned. Next time use a contract that spells out all the details.
Theyre both wacky...no wonder it didn't work out🤪🤪🤪
He walked in like Willy Wonka 🤣😂 first impression.
He looked more like he was a member of the Mafia the way he sauntered into the courtroom.
She can't even look JM in the eyes when she lies. She's so shifty.
Plaintiff is more than creepy. He's shady. He told her $500 because he thought he was going to get a 'bonus'. 🤢
Exactly 💯😂 - nasty boy!
Exactly. Did you see his face when the judge read the "ok hun" text? He knew he was caught.
@@claraesparza7030. Exactly + the fact he didn't want to send her stuff as she wanted , but wanted her to come over and ... "Work together in his home" 🥴 Creep !
she's annoying with the way she's talking
Always always put things in writing. Have a contract. Have a contract. Simple as that. 😊😊😊
And get a receipt!!!
The guy in the back shaking his head whenever they said something unbelievable like "I don't have the facebook post" , "my script is registered with WGA" was the MVP!
She (the defendant) didn't make eye contact once! She's crazy!!
lol she reminds me of Rhoda and sometimes of barbara streisand. love them both
They're both nuts. She was crazy for asking him to work for free, and he was crazy for agreeing to it
She thought that her look was going to get her project for free and he’s mad that she wasn’t giving him play and so here they are .
Wow, they both think way too highly of themselves. She's annoying af
$500 for filming and editing a 20 minute production is actually a steal of a deal. So he cannot be a true professional.
I was surprised she didn't show any comedic talent in the hallway. That was her 15 seconds of potential fame. Say something funny!
Funny? I'm pretty sure that is not possible. For her.
LMAO Doug trying to move her along...
She's lying she can't even look judge in eye or even talk to judge while looking at her!!!
Omg that poor child.
Children of crazy narcissists, it's NOT YOUR FAULT ypur parent can't love you. They are BROKEN and evil.
WHAT? I don't understand why he won anything at all, he held the video hostage and she thought her only way of obtaining it was by agreeing to pay for it and then when she realised she wasn't going to be getting it, cancelled the cheque. So why did the judge order her to pay his full ransom in order to get an unfinished version? This is so wrong on so many levels. If he had kidnapped a child would the judge order the parent to pay the ransom just because they had agreed to, to get their child back?...
No she agreed in writing to pay for his work. It was in the texts regardless of what she claimed.
This is nothing like kidnapping a kid. She agreed to it instead of taking him to court. 🙄
Lay off the drama pills already. 💊
More than likely the agreement that they made was made before the hostage situation. He probably demanded more money before he gave it back to her. That’s where the misunderstanding is for me they didn’t really clear that part up…
There is something wrong with both of them! She seems like she’s a couple french fries short of a happy meal and he seems like a manipulative jerk! Best of luck to both of them!! 🤪
OMG! She did the "Corporate Erin" swallow at 1:50. 🤦🏾♀️
She’s just here to be seen on TV. 15 minutes of game.
Fame
@@nightsky3981 She is totally nuts.........insane
Game is right. They both tried to run game.
"...they saw the vision of my creativity." LOL.
The plaintiff is a creep. And you can tell he's not very talented because if he starts crying because of $250 or $500 that is pretty pathetic.
Artist thinking that other artist should do work without payment is really a mystery to me
They are both artists - of the BS kind.
BRAVO Judge Millan.
It's only 0:30 and the description for the plaintiff seems over-the-top.
I LOVE Judge Milian! She’s brilliant! She’s my woman crush!
6:58 I can't one bit blame Judge Milian for getting exasperated with these two. They are definitely childish, and IMO are not material people for working in the movie industry.
LoL the judges centering breath at the beginning is everything
I love it when one of the litigants comes in dragging a cane, a walker, or even in a wheelchair that they clearly don't need, in order to try and get that sympathy vote from JM.
They do tht @ the "pain specialist " you see them walking normal in parking lot then they get close to door they start leaning & moaning using their canes& walkers it's hilarious 😅😂😅😮 but it kinda makes me mad it hurts real patients with pain issues
same as the whiplash car accidents, @@Jenny-uv4dl
"If you're good at something never do it for free."
The defendant is like a cartoon character. She's acting like she's on stage during her trial. I can't even take her seriously.
Defendant acts like Amber Heard and looks like Paris Hilton all rolled into one, but this wasn't a criminal case and she's not a victim. She and the plaintiff are both off the charts. 🙄
More $ for your worth? - Judge shut his mouth quick- “You Creative Types” 😆 - -> Now go home.
I can’t imagine working with either of these wacky people!!
The defendant is crazy she can’t even look at the judge straight in the face and the plaintiff is a total tool
These litigants totally deserve each other
9:39 I've seen LOTS of episodes of court shows, but I haven't seen many people get as hostile in the courtroom as this woman did here.
Guest appearance by Howie Mandel
😂 😂 😂
The Wish version of Howie Mandel 😂
The point the guy made during the interview at the end was the killer. She didn't have a written agreement with the guy that his services were a work-made-for-hire so he still owns the copyright to his work.
She was trying to get something done for nothing
Plaintiff: we became friends on Facebook.
Judge: What are you ten...
God bless this Judge!!! ❤
I'm not sure I believe the plaintiff. He is a piece of work! However, the defendant is irritating in her mannerisms and body language. I don't believe her either, and she isn't poised enough to do stand-up. Absolutely no eye contact with JM. Plaintiff is sweating big time 😄 The communication between the two of them is so immature. JM hit that nail on the head. I wish JM had told her she doesn't have to bend forward to speak into the mic.
She did a lot of leaning forward speaking into the mic as if she was a cashier at Walmart or worked at McDonald's. Maybe she was trying not to look so nervous. I don't know.
Why would people donate their skills to someone who is capable of paying? Or.
Why would someone ask people to donate!?!? That's gutsy
She's talking and not looking at the judge. This shows that she's not being truthful since she can't even look at the judge in the eye.
This Defendent needs to take a breath. She seems like she had one to many cups of coffee 😂
The plaintiff is beyond annoying.
They’re both nuts but she clearly lied and didn’t want to pay him
How is she looking at everyone at the same time?
If you're talking about the judge, I would say she's scanning the room back and forth. She's been questioning litigants for so many years.
The plaintiff behaves like a petulant child, does not have the proper disposition for this line of work. The defendant is not much better.
He thought he was going to lose so he said you have not let me talk lol, that's the judge on the pc she yells at you so much you don't know which way she's going, even though she already knew who was going to win before sitting down she makes it look like a jerry springer show and the crazy lady didn't help.
Why is that little girl there?😂
I literally just turned 30. Planned a whole wedding this year pretty much on my own. And even I know that you need to get EVERYTHING IN WRITING !!! Who expects that a verbal contract is enough these days ???
its never been a good idea, not to have a contract,
@user-hi9pk1ng8k lol who hurt you? Your spouse apparently
as soon as the defendant opened her mouth I knew this would be a good one 😂😂 both are nuts
Why does she open her mouth so wide?
... anyone know if that footage ever saw the light of day. I would love to see the $500 project so self-important and indulgent that two lunatics went on daytime television to squabble over it. I bet it's bad... REAL bad... like, The Room bad...
That plaintiff was creepy as hell. I wouldn't go to his house alone either after he called her a prostitute. Then he called her "hun". Did you see the way the judge looked at him and raised her eyebrows? I've had narcissist boyfriends before and they acted just like him.
Creepy as hell? He didn’t do anything wrong you don’t even know the guy, your prob divorced Elaine
I think she got this wrong He blackmailed her and she allowed it
I cannot imagine an industry, that would see this video and decide to hire either of these prima dona's?
the defendent is so pretty but when she started talking i did not think she would sound so loud and hyper. & theyre both not believable.
She really isn’t especially when she opened her mouth.
Kevin and Karen throwing the toys out of the stroller