I believe one of the reasons he chose to use just iron sights and not a scope was that the lens on a scope can reflect sunlight and give away his position. So it would seem like he was at a disadvantage when really his opponents, at least the other snipers he faced, were giving themselves away.
Also scopes were still in their infancy and not well sealed and cold conditions could cause them to fog internally and they limit the hours you can shoot because of light requirements. Many more reasons in the pre wwii days to mistrust optical technology.
Bicycle is cheap, quiet, needs no fuel or hay, faster than walking. WW2 era Finland had not plenty fuel production or lorries. A horse was number 1 transport.
The Soviet army is marching through the Finnish swamps when they hear shouting from the other side of a nearby hill: "I bet one Finn can beat ten Soviets!" The Soviet officer laughs at this and sends ten of his best soldiers to deal with this guy. After a couple of minutes of shooting they hear the voice again: "I bet one Finn can beat a hundred Soviets!" The officer, now enraged, sends a hundred soldiers to silence this cocky Finn. A few minutes of shooting and screaming later, the voice shouts again: "I bet one Finn can beat a thousand Soviets!" The officer is now absolutely furious with this enemy, but knows that nobody could possibly beat 1000 soldiers alone, so he accepts the challenge once more and sends 1000 of his men. Nearly 15 minutes of shooting, screaming, and bright flashes later, a lone Soviet soldier comes crawling back over the hill with severe burns, covered in blood and half of his leg mangled. Panicked, he yells to his comrades: "Don't go up there! It's a trap! There are actually two of them!"
@@viking_nor watched it long time ago, got curious, did some digging, took me about 2 - 3 days, on and off, it was just propaganda with 0 proof, just words, the only truth about him was he survived the horrors fighting Russia from a very advantageous points, caused ridiculous amount of casualties, but lost the war non the less. His numbers are actually his platoon numbers with him and other 2 survivors from his platoon, both never said a word that Simo was a hero, a very excellent marksman but very resilient and very tough. Everything else are said by the Finland government, and to make it worse, he actually suffered heavy wounds and half of the war he was just recuperating in a hospital, and after recuperated, joined other regiments which again, not a word from them either.
I believe one of the reasons he chose to use just iron sights and not a scope was that the lens on a scope can reflect sunlight and give away his position. So it would seem like he was at a disadvantage when really his opponents, at least the other snipers he faced, were giving themselves away.
That and i thinh the shooting distances arent in hundred meters if forest often.
He also had wider view of the area so he did not need to refocus scope after every shot. Just pick the next one on the row, line, whatever.
Also scopes were still in their infancy and not well sealed and cold conditions could cause them to fog internally and they limit the hours you can shoot because of light requirements. Many more reasons in the pre wwii days to mistrust optical technology.
They say why he used it in the video. You should watch it😂
Plus, a lot of the Russian troops were wearing a shade of green instead of white. So a lot of them weren't hard to see
Keep the FE videos coming!! His content is excellent and very well researched.
This was really interesting!😮 You two are great!!👍
I have been waiting when you learn about finland 😊
Hauska nimimerkki. :D
Awesome! this is such a great story!
Also, in those low of a temperatures, a scope has the tendency to frost the lenses, making them useless unless cleaned
Bicycle is cheap, quiet, needs no fuel or hay, faster than walking. WW2 era Finland had not plenty fuel production or lorries. A horse was number 1 transport.
Sisu ! You endure harshness ! Somebody must do the hard work ! I volunteer and I do not need reward for that ! That is thoughness !
For another way of looking at his story, the band Sabaton has a song about him.
Funny watching this with "his" signature spirit drink "Leikattua". Not his but in his camp this drink was inveneted.
I suggest you watch his videos to the end. He almost always has a little clip at the end that is related to the story he tells
The most amazing part of the story is that he killed all 542 enemies in the span of 100 days, which is just over 3 months. 😳
The sniper he shot was from 490 meters away...
Actually the real number might have been as much as 800 kills. He took down with machine guns many too, sniped over 500.
Hey guys 👋 what's up?
Comment for the algorithm
Not the Russians, the Soviets. But I can see why it's easy to mix them up
The Soviet army is marching through the Finnish swamps when they hear shouting from the other side of a nearby hill:
"I bet one Finn can beat ten Soviets!"
The Soviet officer laughs at this and sends ten of his best soldiers to deal with this guy. After a couple of minutes of shooting they hear the voice again:
"I bet one Finn can beat a hundred Soviets!"
The officer, now enraged, sends a hundred soldiers to silence this cocky Finn. A few minutes of shooting and screaming later, the voice shouts again:
"I bet one Finn can beat a thousand Soviets!"
The officer is now absolutely furious with this enemy, but knows that nobody could possibly beat 1000 soldiers alone, so he accepts the challenge once more and sends 1000 of his men. Nearly 15 minutes of shooting, screaming, and bright flashes later, a lone Soviet soldier comes crawling back over the hill with severe burns, covered in blood and half of his leg mangled. Panicked, he yells to his comrades:
"Don't go up there! It's a trap! There are actually two of them!"
Terror of Marocco name came from service in Foreign Legion and some drinking...check out the history. 😁😁
Can you reaction history of word war one by epic history tv channel please
isnt it 500sniper kills+ then 270+riffle
Watch the video and find out
@@viking_nor watched it long time ago, got curious, did some digging, took me about 2 - 3 days, on and off, it was just propaganda with 0 proof, just words, the only truth about him was he survived the horrors fighting Russia from a very advantageous points, caused ridiculous amount of casualties, but lost the war non the less. His numbers are actually his platoon numbers with him and other 2 survivors from his platoon, both never said a word that Simo was a hero, a very excellent marksman but very resilient and very tough. Everything else are said by the Finland government, and to make it worse, he actually suffered heavy wounds and half of the war he was just recuperating in a hospital, and after recuperated, joined other regiments which again, not a word from them either.
She is so beautiful
Cringe some more pls
Your sound is not very good.
Guys can you fix your terrible audio? 🙏🏼