This should have at least connected with Wyze Hub, for remote setup (like temporary access codes), or remote unlock. This feels like 2015 tech. I was almost about to "upgrade" my existing Wyze Locks with these, until, "bLuEtOoTh OnLy". I guess it makes sense that this is way cheaper than the Wyze Lock.
Having no Alexa/Google Assistant is the only issue I have. The original Lock has this and is also Bluetooth. It uses a small plug in hub to communicate with WiFi and I wish it would be done this way again at least so smart assistance could be used to better integrate it with other smart home echo systems. I love a lot of this but that is the only deal breaker for me.
The problem with integrating it with a digital assistant is that makes it inherently less secure. For me, it would have been a deal-breaker if it WAS connected to Google/Alexa.
Is the "Interior Lock Component" (the inside half with the hand bolt) also weather proof? If they are, I was thinking these would be great for fence gates.
i like the bluetooth only option for security and i like th 20 fingerprints and codes for small apartments . but as an installer , i really wanted to see a tapered deadbolt for locking doors with weather stripping that tend to gap slightly whn they clos e
Wouldn't allowing any amount of random numbers before and/or after your password make it less safe? Cause now you can try multiple password combinations in one try.
No. It is actually safer because no one will know how many random numbers you have prior and after. This can make it appear that the password is super long and you wouldn't know which series of numbers is the correct one. It just increased the combination of passwords too infinity without having you have to remember such a long number.
Right. It makes it easy to guess PINs of any length. If someone guesses 1234567890, it will match 1234, 12345, 123456, 1234567, 2345, 23456, and many others.
@@jmrdrgz Just the opposite. It's like making your password "superman," but then allowing it to unlock if the word "superman" appears anywhere in what's entered. I could enter the entire dictionary all at once and it would let me in. They call it "anti-peep" because it supposedly allows you to trick anyone watching over your shoulder by entering a bunch of extra digits. But, if those extra digits work when I enter my pin, they'll work when they do it too.
I thought about this more, and it's not a security issue. The PINs are 4-8 digits, which is a huge amount of combinations. The lock has a temporary lock-out when there are too many failures, so it would take years to guess randomly. It's easier just to smash a window
@@andrewziem370 I agree that it's not a security issue. I suppose I misspoke. What I meant is that it doesn't actually mitigate what it proposes to mitigate.
I love how clean this looks, and the features and price point is 👌. However I need to have traditional key access to stay compliant with my apartment’s lease agreement. Having key access would also give me great peace of mind knowing I have a non-electric way to enter if the battery dies or there’s some weird glitch. I know you can’t make everyone happy but for me this is a miss. Looking forward to the next series of Wyze smart locks.
Yup… The emergency power input helps, but I don’t usually have a power bank on hand, and they shouldn’t exactly be kept in a hot vehicle, and pulling up in the yard as close to the door as can to string a 10’ USB C cable from the cab to the door seems excessive. At that point, I’d probably just climb the fence, dig out the hidden key in my back yard, and use the back door. Or, I could just keep a physical key in the bottom of my center console. When I bought my first smart lock, a physical key was a must. In the probably 8 years I’ve had a smart lock installed, I’ve only needed the key one time after one of the four AA batteries randomly decided to die, which dropped the voltage enough the lock thought it was dead. Grabbing the key from my truck was a lot easier than hopping the fence…
@@RandomBogey "Looking forward to the next series of Wyze smart locks." well, it was the LAST generation product which had the physical key (and wifi, and etc.). Horses for courses, as they say.
Since its bluetooth and not wifi, is the app useless when not in the house? So if I'm in the store, I won't see any details of who unlocked/locked, etc?
Good looking lock. Does the assembly come with a key for the entry side? I’d like to install this on a door that has a very large window. To prevent break-ins by just reaching in and turning the lock. Thanks…
Not sure I understand how the one time code would work when "away from your house". How would the lock know the one time code when out of range? Also is there any possibility to add auto unlock when let's say a trusted device (main phone) connects to bluetooth when walking up to the door? Love to hear back and am a huge fan of the Wyze product line!
I have this same question. If there’s no WiFi connection, how would the lock know about the one time code? Would the person need to download Wyze in order for this option to work?
It uses an internal encryption key to generate codes remotely in a 4 hr window. You can't pick the temp code it is given too you. The time windows are also determined by a set time range. Each code grants one time access. It's really the best option for an emergency remote entry
So with this lock, you cannot lock and unlock from the app unless you are in bluetooth range, correct? That function is limited to only the wifi version?
@@andrewziem370 what about needing it unlocked twice while you are gone? Example, friend went to grab something but, on the way out, friend forgot something. Can't use the temp code twice.
@@rewlazman you get 16 codes every 4 hours. You can also add people such as a friend with their own permanent code or fingerprints. Then you can restrict each person to have access at certain times of day or day of week
If it's not connected to wifi... How can you generate a one time code while away from home? How would the lock become aware of the newly generated one time code?
It randomly generates up to 16 codes per hour, and then the app displays 1 of these codes for you to use once in a 4 hour widowed timeframe. Kind of like those 2FA tokens that generate codes when you press the button on them, except this one let's that code displayed be used for up to 4 hours. Hopefully, only the "displayed" code is valid and not all 16 codes that are generated.
Why not come out with a new keypad with fingerprint reader that we can connect to our existing first gen locks? I like the wifi functionality and exposed keyhole on my current locks, I just want the fingerprint reader!
Everything about this lock is perfect, except one. If the battery dies when I am out of the house. When I come back and need to unlock the door I will need a power source? Does this mean I need to carry a power source? I would rather have the option to carry a key to unlock this if the battery dies. Is this correct or did I miss something in the video?
If the battery dies, connect a portable battery by USB-C to the front of the lock. Just watch out for the battery indicator, so this doesn't happen. I'm not sure what the indication will be exactly. On my house, we also have the garage and back doors as alternate entrances.
Will Wyze ever make a Smart Lock that doesn't use a deadbolt? I just want a regular doorknob/lever that you need a code/app to activate the handle. This is for an interior door that doesn't have a deadbolt.
is there any future plan to allow it to connect to Samsung Smartthings hub or similar bridge so I could connect this to Alexa/google if I wanted to? it would be nice to have the choice to add to wifi or not depending on what people needed.
Is there a function like "automatically lock in 3 minutes after unlock", it's crucial if someone forget to lock after entering or mis-push the unlock button on app.
They will only need the app if you want them to be able to open from the app. If you set them with a fingerprint they can open that way without the app.
At this time of age, should at leat have a rechargeable battery. Most people already mentioned wifi. My guess is that you guys are starting slow and cheap and work your way up, and eventually have rechargeable and wifi capabilities.
It happens once during the initial pairing. It either is TOPT (Time-based one-time password) or similar. TOPT is seen in Google Authenticator, Okta, RSA, and other apps
I was thinking the same thing... Where is the logic board? Is it in the motor portion of the lock or keypad portion? Is there any magnetic shielding? Etc etc... Lol @lockpickinglawyer for testing 😁
Wyze seem to be continuing to want to be the Jack of all products and master of few. Could it be they’re spreading their software engineers to thin by trying to support a large product line rather than supporting/improving/perfecting a not as large line. A 2K, 5GHz WyzeCam V4 would be a nice start. New features or even a new model of the watch. Master and perfect what made you Wyze.
They already perfected their cameras, and their locks, and their thermostats. Their app is also perfect, and everything gets regular updates... You simply have an opinion, and it's wrong.
@@starmc26 So you can keep your iPad in landscape orientation an still view everything properly throughout the app without the need to turn it to portrait? If your answer is no, then maybe “perfect” is just an exaggeration.
@@BlaqViper You most CERTAINLY can veiw the cameras in landscape mode. The app is a cell phone app, they don't have a version for PC's, laptops and tablets. If they did, it would work PERFECTLY. YOU are asking it to work in a way which it isn't intended.... USER ERROR!!
@@starmc26 If it was truly a “cell phone app” it would fill the full screen of an iPad. This is an app that hasn’t seen an overhaul in years and is FAR from “perfect”.
So i need to be i bluetooth range to setup a one time code for the dog walker or a buddy to grab something. That makes no sense. I cant open it from the app from anywhere in case i need someone to grab something at my house. So unless i plan that ill have an emergency im screwed?
No, you do not need to be in range to generate one-time codes. It either is Time-based one-time password (TOTP) or something similar. If you enabled two-factor auth for your Wyze account, you already use TOTP
I understand why you wouldn't want wifi because of the battery factor, but could you incorporate a hub type of thing where it can be plugged into an outlet within Bluetooth range that can talk to the lock and the hub is connected to wifi
wifi wouldn't kill the battery that quickly. my current smart lock uses wifi and battery life last about 7-8 months. plus i can use Alexa to unlock it too
I almost agree it could be less secure, but the PINs are 4-8 digits. It's practically impossible to guess this randomly, even with the anti-peep making it easier. This isn't like the movies where they brute force combinations in seconds. First, you have to type them. Second, there is a security temporary lock-out that will stop accepting codes when there are too many failed attempts, so it would take many years. It's easier just to smash a window or use a crowbar.
I like the look....But why would you not have WiFi on this?? or at least have it connect to the Wyze sense hub???It is of no use to me with just Bluetooth ..... WiFi is the way to go on this guys...This could be a hit with WiFi.
Send me one and I'll prove how unsecure it is in a UA-cam video. If I can't break into a door with it installed properly within 60 seconds. Then I'll buy 4 units.
Please STOP making home automation gear without WiFi! This should have WiFi, the lamp should have WiFi, the scale should have WiFi, the Band should have WiFi. I'll pay the $5 extra.
How is the anti-peep technology "anti-peep"? If it works for me when I enter extra digits, it will work them when they enter the same extra digits! This is actually LESS secure, not more.
It could be made useful if it stored the random non-PIN portion and then locked out the lock if it saw the same random pattern again for a certain period, like say 1 week. That way you can enter your PIN while someone watches, by disguising it, but, if they come back behind you and try it it just locks out the door. Then when you aren't being watched just punch in your PIN normally, and don't worry about accidentally locking yourself out.
I agree it could be less secure, but the PINs are 4-8 digits. It's practically impossible to guess this randomly, even with the anti-peep making it easier. There is a security temporary lock-out that will stop accepting codes when there are too many failed attempts. It's easier just to smash a window or use a crowbar.
@@andrewziem370 I'm with you there, hell, most modern houses you can just use a box cutter or keyhole saw and go through a wall. Practically no alarm systems work for that either.
This should have at least connected with Wyze Hub, for remote setup (like temporary access codes), or remote unlock.
This feels like 2015 tech. I was almost about to "upgrade" my existing Wyze Locks with these, until, "bLuEtOoTh OnLy".
I guess it makes sense that this is way cheaper than the Wyze Lock.
You can do one time access codes from anywhere because they are based on the unique panel rolling code.
Now we need a Wyze Lock & Bolt hybrid, where we have WiFi connectivity with a keypad built into the lock
I think they intended the lack of wifi as a security feature?
Having no Alexa/Google Assistant is the only issue I have. The original Lock has this and is also Bluetooth. It uses a small plug in hub to communicate with WiFi and I wish it would be done this way again at least so smart assistance could be used to better integrate it with other smart home echo systems.
I love a lot of this but that is the only deal breaker for me.
Agreed!
The problem with integrating it with a digital assistant is that makes it inherently less secure. For me, it would have been a deal-breaker if it WAS connected to Google/Alexa.
@@BrandonRasaka you can't have anyone just say "unlock the door".. it asks you for a pin, also, you can turn that function off.
Is the "Interior Lock Component" (the inside half with the hand bolt) also weather proof? If they are, I was thinking these would be great for fence gates.
Unfortunately not, but I've passed this request to the team for future consideration!
I have the Wyze Lock and just ordered this for my garage. We'll see how if the BT connection works properly. I can always return it if it's crap
A few times the Bluetooth wouldn't connect for me but usually works fine. Yesterday it worked on another floor through several walls
i like the bluetooth only option for security and i like th 20 fingerprints and codes for small apartments . but as an installer , i really wanted to see a tapered deadbolt for locking doors with weather stripping that tend to gap slightly whn they clos e
Wouldn't allowing any amount of random numbers before and/or after your password make it less safe? Cause now you can try multiple password combinations in one try.
No. It is actually safer because no one will know how many random numbers you have prior and after. This can make it appear that the password is super long and you wouldn't know which series of numbers is the correct one. It just increased the combination of passwords too infinity without having you have to remember such a long number.
Right. It makes it easy to guess PINs of any length. If someone guesses 1234567890, it will match 1234, 12345, 123456, 1234567, 2345, 23456, and many others.
@@jmrdrgz Just the opposite. It's like making your password "superman," but then allowing it to unlock if the word "superman" appears anywhere in what's entered. I could enter the entire dictionary all at once and it would let me in. They call it "anti-peep" because it supposedly allows you to trick anyone watching over your shoulder by entering a bunch of extra digits. But, if those extra digits work when I enter my pin, they'll work when they do it too.
I thought about this more, and it's not a security issue. The PINs are 4-8 digits, which is a huge amount of combinations. The lock has a temporary lock-out when there are too many failures, so it would take years to guess randomly. It's easier just to smash a window
@@andrewziem370 I agree that it's not a security issue. I suppose I misspoke. What I meant is that it doesn't actually mitigate what it proposes to mitigate.
I love how clean this looks, and the features and price point is 👌. However I need to have traditional key access to stay compliant with my apartment’s lease agreement. Having key access would also give me great peace of mind knowing I have a non-electric way to enter if the battery dies or there’s some weird glitch. I know you can’t make everyone happy but for me this is a miss. Looking forward to the next series of Wyze smart locks.
Yup… The emergency power input helps, but I don’t usually have a power bank on hand, and they shouldn’t exactly be kept in a hot vehicle, and pulling up in the yard as close to the door as can to string a 10’ USB C cable from the cab to the door seems excessive. At that point, I’d probably just climb the fence, dig out the hidden key in my back yard, and use the back door. Or, I could just keep a physical key in the bottom of my center console. When I bought my first smart lock, a physical key was a must. In the probably 8 years I’ve had a smart lock installed, I’ve only needed the key one time after one of the four AA batteries randomly decided to die, which dropped the voltage enough the lock thought it was dead. Grabbing the key from my truck was a lot easier than hopping the fence…
@@RandomBogey "Looking forward to the next series of Wyze smart locks." well, it was the LAST generation product which had the physical key (and wifi, and etc.). Horses for courses, as they say.
YOU MIGHT WANT TO TRY OUT LOCKLY IT HAS EVERYTHING YOU NEED EXCEPT THE HIGH COST
@@21boxhead You might want to try turning off caps lock, it gets your point across without looking like a crazy person yelling
@@RandomBogey I NEVER TURN THEM OFF
Since its bluetooth and not wifi, is the app useless when not in the house? So if I'm in the store, I won't see any details of who unlocked/locked, etc?
Outside of your house you can generate one time use codes to let people in, and you can use your Wyze cameras to monitors who's coming in
Come on wyze that lock should have wifi and even a built-in camera.
They're probably going to refresh the size lock . Notice how this one isn't called wize lock V2 or anything
I actually just canceled my order because it didnt have WiFi. Kinda pissed its not integrated to my systems.
@@naturalphenomenon7877 what sense getting that lock if you can't operate it from anywhere.
The lack of wifi seems to be a security feature. I bought the lock, and it seems fine without the wifi.
I’m so getting this !!! Can you u lock this from anywhere, or just the 16ft Bluetooth range ???
Only BT range
Bluetooth range for the app lock, and you can set an auto-lock based on time.
Outside BT range, you can generate a one-time use code in the app
Good looking lock.
Does the assembly come with a key for the entry side?
I’d like to install this on a door that has a very large window.
To prevent break-ins by just reaching in and turning the lock.
Thanks…
No, but wouldn't they just go through a window instead?
Kramer would've hit the door hard if Jerry had have had one of these! 🤣
It’s a shame not Wi-Fi sticking with the first one
Weird, because the only reason I'm buying this is because it's bluetooth, which has better battery life than wifi locks.
@@SummerSausage1 it’s not weird if I am just other side of the world I can open the door to family with Wi-Fi you can’t do with Bluetooth
@@giovanniturco6428 Isn't that what the code is for? Just text them the code.
@@SummerSausage1 The original is also Bluetooth AS WELL AS wi-fi.
Not sure I understand how the one time code would work when "away from your house". How would the lock know the one time code when out of range? Also is there any possibility to add auto unlock when let's say a trusted device (main phone) connects to bluetooth when walking up to the door? Love to hear back and am a huge fan of the Wyze product line!
I have this same question. If there’s no WiFi connection, how would the lock know about the one time code? Would the person need to download Wyze in order for this option to work?
It uses an internal encryption key to generate codes remotely in a 4 hr window. You can't pick the temp code it is given too you. The time windows are also determined by a set time range. Each code grants one time access. It's really the best option for an emergency remote entry
You TEXT the code to someone needing in AT the door. THEY enter the code onto the keypad.
Such an awesome lock bolt! Do you make it for larger doors?
Size queen.
So with this lock, you cannot lock and unlock from the app unless you are in bluetooth range, correct? That function is limited to only the wifi version?
yeah so, bluetooth only lets you be lazy from the couch. not being able to unlock while miles away is a deal breaker for me.
You can remote unlock by generating a one-time use code in the app and messaging it to someone at the house
@@andrewziem370 what about needing it unlocked twice while you are gone? Example, friend went to grab something but, on the way out, friend forgot something. Can't use the temp code twice.
@@rewlazman you get 16 codes every 4 hours. You can also add people such as a friend with their own permanent code or fingerprints. Then you can restrict each person to have access at certain times of day or day of week
If it's not connected to wifi... How can you generate a one time code while away from home? How would the lock become aware of the newly generated one time code?
It randomly generates up to 16 codes per hour, and then the app displays 1 of these codes for you to use once in a 4 hour widowed timeframe. Kind of like those 2FA tokens that generate codes when you press the button on them, except this one let's that code displayed be used for up to 4 hours. Hopefully, only the "displayed" code is valid and not all 16 codes that are generated.
Why not come out with a new keypad with fingerprint reader that we can connect to our existing first gen locks? I like the wifi functionality and exposed keyhole on my current locks, I just want the fingerprint reader!
Probably not worth all the R&D costs.
This seems like a cool lock but I do wish it was an all in one device instead of two. These features + WiFi would be great
@@iKingRPG what R&D??.... It's literally just adding a fingerprint reader to the already existing keypad, and updating firmware and software.
Everything about this lock is perfect, except one. If the battery dies when I am out of the house. When I come back and need to unlock the door I will need a power source? Does this mean I need to carry a power source? I would rather have the option to carry a key to unlock this if the battery dies. Is this correct or did I miss something in the video?
If the battery dies, connect a portable battery by USB-C to the front of the lock. Just watch out for the battery indicator, so this doesn't happen. I'm not sure what the indication will be exactly. On my house, we also have the garage and back doors as alternate entrances.
Are the wyze water/leak sensors hardwired? I dont want to have to forget to replace batteries for them.
Hey Wyze guy - my finger is a wizard! 😂
Is it worth it to upgrade over the original Wyze lock?
Will Wyze ever make a Smart Lock that doesn't use a deadbolt? I just want a regular doorknob/lever that you need a code/app to activate the handle. This is for an interior door that doesn't have a deadbolt.
I feel like market for that is a lot lower than the number of people who want a smart lock for an exterior door
Can this work with the Wyze Bluetooth-WiFi bridge from Wyze OG Lock?
No
is there any future plan to allow it to connect to Samsung Smartthings hub or similar bridge so I could connect this to Alexa/google if I wanted to? it would be nice to have the choice to add to wifi or not depending on what people needed.
Really hope this isn't a replacement for the original wyze lock. The option of keeping the exterior look and key capability is the selling feature
I love my 1st gen. Wish this had RFID and WIFI.
I love Wyze , the only issue is they are not Howmkit compatible
Will this survive Canadian winters? (-40 celsius)
Is there a function like "automatically lock in 3 minutes after unlock", it's crucial if someone forget to lock after entering or mis-push the unlock button on app.
Yes, there is auto lock
I just got my 1st gen wyze lock installed , 😒😒😢😢😭😭😭.
30 days return policy
If I set up multiple users with a passcode and/or fingerprint access to this lock, do they need to have the Wyze app on their phone too?
They will only need the app if you want them to be able to open from the app. If you set them with a fingerprint they can open that way without the app.
Can I get one for review? Testing this in Canadian weather would be interesting 😉
I am concerned about no key backup cause if the motor broke, then your screwed
Exactly!!
There is a key backup
@@pcbutts1 i didn't see a keyhole so how can there be a key backup?
@@rewlazman You are correct, I was wrong.
Sweet lock! But can you please make a Smart Lock that doesn't use a deadbolt? I use the regular handle lock most of the time. Thx
Just fix your door
Next, you'll be asking for a lock that works on a screen door handle...... Just get a deadbolt.
@@starmc26 Dude, no need for the smart ass reply. People are free to make requests. Relax!
At this time of age, should at leat have a rechargeable battery. Most people already mentioned wifi. My guess is that you guys are starting slow and cheap and work your way up, and eventually have rechargeable and wifi capabilities.
It's pretty easy to just buy rechargeable batteries at the store these days.
4:45 How does the lock get synced with the onetime password if I’m away from home? Obviously I will not be in the Bluetooth range.
It happens once during the initial pairing. It either is TOPT (Time-based one-time password) or similar. TOPT is seen in Google Authenticator, Okta, RSA, and other apps
But all the features in the app only work in bluetooth range right? So if I'm miles from my home, how does the one time code actually work?
My thoughts exactly. You'd have to set it up waaaaay in advanced, or just give them the main code (then change it later) if you're away.
The one time code is generated based on your device internal rolling code. It's already sync when your app pairs with the lock initially
What thickness of the door it can be installed?
I just bought the original one!!!!!!!!!
Could I pair my current Wyze Lock Hub puck to connect the Wyze Lock Bolt to the Google Home Environment ?
No, there's no wifi on this thing
Would love to see what Lock Picking Lawyer would do to this thing.
I was thinking the same thing... Where is the logic board? Is it in the motor portion of the lock or keypad portion? Is there any magnetic shielding? Etc etc... Lol
@lockpickinglawyer for testing 😁
Seriously.. in the era of smart ecosystem. Prev era technology..
I want integrated keypad / fingerprint sensor with wyze lock original features not this :(
Wyze seem to be continuing to want to be the Jack of all products and master of few. Could it be they’re spreading their software engineers to thin by trying to support a large product line rather than supporting/improving/perfecting a not as large line. A 2K, 5GHz WyzeCam V4 would be a nice start. New features or even a new model of the watch. Master and perfect what made you Wyze.
They already perfected their cameras, and their locks, and their thermostats. Their app is also perfect, and everything gets regular updates... You simply have an opinion, and it's wrong.
@@starmc26 So you can keep your iPad in landscape orientation an still view everything properly throughout the app without the need to turn it to portrait? If your answer is no, then maybe “perfect” is just an exaggeration.
@@BlaqViper You most CERTAINLY can veiw the cameras in landscape mode. The app is a cell phone app, they don't have a version for PC's, laptops and tablets. If they did, it would work PERFECTLY. YOU are asking it to work in a way which it isn't intended.... USER ERROR!!
@@starmc26 If it was truly a “cell phone app” it would fill the full screen of an iPad. This is an app that hasn’t seen an overhaul in years and is FAR from “perfect”.
@@BlaqViper it fills the screen PERFECTLY and COMPLETELY on iphones AND android PHONES.
So i need to be i bluetooth range to setup a one time code for the dog walker or a buddy to grab something. That makes no sense. I cant open it from the app from anywhere in case i need someone to grab something at my house. So unless i plan that ill have an emergency im screwed?
No, you do not need to be in range to generate one-time codes. It either is Time-based one-time password (TOTP) or something similar. If you enabled two-factor auth for your Wyze account, you already use TOTP
I have wyze lock... Wish I didn't so I could get this. Maybe come out with a biometric keypad?
So does it have the Auto Unlock feature like the original?
I'm guessing you didn't watch the entire video. @5:15
@@PaoloCabacoy
I did watch the entire video, I wouldn’t comment if I hadn’t. Nothing was mentioned about the Auto Unlock feature.
Can this door lock work with Google assistant? 🤔
No, there is no wifi
good evening, you amde breathtaking picture!
I understand why you wouldn't want wifi because of the battery factor, but could you incorporate a hub type of thing where it can be plugged into an outlet within Bluetooth range that can talk to the lock and the hub is connected to wifi
wifi wouldn't kill the battery that quickly. my current smart lock uses wifi and battery life last about 7-8 months. plus i can use Alexa to unlock it too
See Lockly for an example of this
Why not with WIFI ?
It seems to be a security feature to prevent hacking. It may also extend battery life. I recently bought it, and it seems fine as is.
NO WIFI = NO DEAL
It's awfully cheesy that the video cuts just when he puts his finger on the sensor - exactly so you can't tell how long it really takes to unlock.
Any numbers before and after?? That is terribly insecure. That makes it so easy to bruit force.
I almost agree it could be less secure, but the PINs are 4-8 digits. It's practically impossible to guess this randomly, even with the anti-peep making it easier. This isn't like the movies where they brute force combinations in seconds. First, you have to type them. Second, there is a security temporary lock-out that will stop accepting codes when there are too many failed attempts, so it would take many years. It's easier just to smash a window or use a crowbar.
I like the look....But why would you not have WiFi on this?? or at least have it connect to the Wyze sense hub???It is of no use to me with just Bluetooth ..... WiFi is the way to go on this guys...This could be a hit with WiFi.
Nice👍
Send me one and I'll prove how unsecure it is in a UA-cam video. If I can't break into a door with it installed properly within 60 seconds.
Then I'll buy 4 units.
Here's a way to break into any house with any lock in sixty seconds: either crowbar the door or smash the window.
I like my normal wyze lock better since it allows me to use my keys. When Russia hits us with an EMP attack, all of you will be “locked out”.
Hence the reason this doesn't have Wi-Fi.
Please STOP making home automation gear without WiFi! This should have WiFi, the lamp should have WiFi, the scale should have WiFi, the Band should have WiFi. I'll pay the $5 extra.
How is the anti-peep technology "anti-peep"? If it works for me when I enter extra digits, it will work them when they enter the same extra digits! This is actually LESS secure, not more.
It could be made useful if it stored the random non-PIN portion and then locked out the lock if it saw the same random pattern again for a certain period, like say 1 week. That way you can enter your PIN while someone watches, by disguising it, but, if they come back behind you and try it it just locks out the door. Then when you aren't being watched just punch in your PIN normally, and don't worry about accidentally locking yourself out.
@@shawn2444 Nice thinking!
I agree it could be less secure, but the PINs are 4-8 digits. It's practically impossible to guess this randomly, even with the anti-peep making it easier. There is a security temporary lock-out that will stop accepting codes when there are too many failed attempts. It's easier just to smash a window or use a crowbar.
@@andrewziem370 I'm with you there, hell, most modern houses you can just use a box cutter or keyhole saw and go through a wall. Practically no alarm systems work for that either.
The question is! Why is it black 😥
Black is the new black.
No thank you, anything like the wyze first camera, that became obsolete because it was prone to being hacked. Oh that wyze never said for 2 years👎
Excellent. Another item with inevitable security flaws that will get thrown into the ever growing Wyze graveyard.
What security flaw does this pick have?
The lack of wifi is a security feature
Neat.
Tone it down, Bubba. You're not as funny as you think you are.
I just ordered!!!!
I'm sorry 😔
yeah yeah yeah BUT! do me a favor and make sure i don't receive 25 gazillion emails from you guys. sick and tired of this shit
@Channel you are naive:) believing that unsubscribe link works is like believing that biden is a president