How Did The Universe Actually Begin?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 вер 2023
- How Did The Universe Actually Begin?
► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
The most distant objects in the universe are also the most ancient. When we look at the Andromeda galaxy, we’re seeing it as it was 2.5 million years ago. Reflection of sunlight off of Jupiter takes 30 minutes to reach us, and even more nearby objects don’t show up exactly as they are right now.
The earliest light scientists have detected is from when the universe was just about a few hundred thousand years old. This early light helped us discover the Big Bang. But what caused it in the first place?
The universe could have been hibernating before something set it in motion; it may have collided with another universe, or perhaps, it’s a part of an eternal cycle of cosmic bursts and rebounds.
Why was the early universe invisible? How does energy define time, and why is 97% of the observable universe forever out of our reach? Could all this lead to another Big Bang?
We are on social media:
destinymediaa
The Destiny voice:
www.TomsVoiceovers.co.uk
Sourses: pastebin.com/raw/Rh7n7tmC
Anyone else watching this at 3am???
I was born with many difficulties in my life. Although I am not fully educated, I have a strong love for science and the universe. Thank you for bringing it to me. Love you
A cat looking at a washing machine doesn't know its a washing machine because the concept is simply beyond its intellectual capability.....I think when it comes to understanding what came before the big bang....humanity is the cat.
[2D is not the center of the universe,
0D is the center of the mirror universe]:
The mirror universe theory is based on the concept of parity violation, which was discovered in the 1950s. Parity violation refers to the observation that certain processes in particle physics don't behave the same way when their coordinates are reversed. This discovery led to the idea that there might be a mirror image of our universe where particles and their properties are flipped.
In this mirror universe, the fundamental particles that make up matter, such as electrons, protons, and neutrinos, would have their charges reversed. For example, in our universe, electrons have a negative charge, but in the mirror universe, they might have a positive charge.
Furthermore, another aspect of the mirror universe theory involves chirality, which refers to the property of particles behaving differently from their mirror images. In our universe, particles have a certain handedness or chirality, but in the mirror universe, this chirality could be reversed.
Leibniz or Newton:
Quantum mechanics is more compatible with Leibniz's relational view of the universe than Newton's absolute view of the universe.
In Newton's absolute view, space and time are absolute and independent entities that exist on their own, independent of the objects and events that take place within them. This view implies that there is a privileged observer who can observe the universe from a neutral and objective perspective.
On the other hand, Leibniz's relational view holds that space and time are not absolute, but are instead relational concepts that are defined by the relationships between objects and events in the universe. This view implies that there is no privileged observer and that observations are always made from a particular point of view.
Quantum mechanics is more compatible with the relational view because it emphasizes the role of observers and the context of measurement in determining the properties of particles. In quantum mechanics, the properties of particles are not absolute, but are instead defined by their relationships with other particles and the measuring apparatus. This means that observations are always made from a particular point of view and that there is no neutral and objective perspective.
Overall, quantum mechanics suggests that the universe is fundamentally relational rather than absolute, and is therefore more compatible with Leibniz's relational view than Newton's absolute view.
What are the two kinds of truth according to Leibniz?
There are two kinds of truths, those of reasoning and those of fact. Truths of fact are contingent and their opposite is possible. Truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible.
What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus?
Newton's calculus is about functions.
Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints.
In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation.
In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation.
What are the arguments against Leibniz?
Critics of Leibniz argue that the world contains an amount of suffering too great to permit belief in philosophical optimism. The claim that we live in the best of all possible worlds drew scorn most notably from Voltaire, who lampooned it in his comic novella Candide.
W Comment. tysm for the elaboration 😅
i concur, i think we live in a washing machine also
Yeah but believing in god is not the right answer, it’s actually the most inaccurate one
@udaiveersinghsandhu978 agreed but am not making the argument for or against a supernatural god rather I am arguing that human intelect is limited and as such so in our understanding of the universe
Thats the thing, they think they figured it out. I bet there is something even further from that. We just simply put have absolutely no way of finding out what it was.
The Entire Universe is in you as you. The knower of your experience is the Universe.
This is one of the most difficult questions that humanity has ever asked itself. Of course, finding the answer will take a very long time... a lot.
Destiny's narrator is a favorite, up there with Attenborough and the narrator for another YT show, History of The Universe.
Love the graphics and those bubbles and swirlies too.
"The Big Bang." Sounds like a typical weekend at yoir moms house.
It's always nice to see such detailed and informative videos on the most complex but at the same time important issue that could ever come to mind. Where did everything we see come from? I'm pleasantly surprised by the abundance of theories we have. This is already something. I think that in the future we will move even closer to this topic and some of them will begin to resemble the truth more than others. The most gratifying thing is that this all happens in real time and I can watch these discoveries live.😃
These channels are spam Ai generated pushing misinformation or disinformation basically a UA-cam chat gbt made these videos
after watching this video it is clear that humanity is beyond human understanding.
I love it when science contradicts itself. Science says there was nothing before the Big Bang, but Science says you can't make something out of nothing
It can't be possible to form such a universe I believe we are created by someone who is so powerful that we can't even identify in universe age now whether you call it god or gods - unknown most advance civilization ) or anything and do they/he created everything for a reason and do they/he see us or control ourselves do they/he really listen prays these are the questions we will find in life after death or never but I will still say that this earth sun everything that we have ever seen can't be created by just black holes and singularity because they die and every other living thing but how can someone die who have created time itself universe itself it can only be one powerful being who can create this unimaginable multiverse
@@munwarumrani3465then who created that God of gods? Who created the creation ? So on. Still difficult. We can’t comprehend. I guess we’ll have to enjoy our time on earth for now.
I created it all.
@@b0bd0le86 lol 😂
The laws of physics break down at the earliest moments of the Big Bang. We don’t even know what the laws would look like at that point so we can’t really speculate at what was even happening.
Here’s the thing nobody knows the beginning of everything and nobody knows the end it’s something beyond our comprehension we simply don’t know
Someone does know, he is here?
Amazing video!
Lol. This sounds like an entry from 'The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy...' "This is clearly impossible." Love it.
This stuff is so cool...like I love looking at the stars 🌟
another good video for my theory😊
Great❤ congratulations ❤
Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the totality of all things.
The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both.
The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.*
It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people.
[In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]:
1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force.
2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
9:45 Which picture is correct: The sectional image of a 3D cube 'typical section' of the universe, densely packed with galaxies in every direction.
Or: The universe is expanding like a balloon and everything (to limited depth) is found on the surface of the balloon called the edge of the Universe, nothing is in the center anymore but empty space, but only what is observed that existed back in time?
Maybe the expanding universe reaches a point where the vacuum at the center becomes so high it literally rips or sucks into existence another Big Bang matter 'universe' which then expands pushing away the old shell one, at which point the old one expands to the point it goes cols eventually breaking down into nothing.
Trust in urself, be a good detective.
There is an elephant in the room explanation for "dark matter". Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. This is illustrated in a common 2 axis dilation graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid.
This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, there would be no dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities.
It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter, in other words they have normal star rotation rates.
Wouldn't a big bang make a void in space where it blew outward? A collision of galaxies is more likely. How huge do galaxies grow?
Depending upon the attractions?
galaxies cluster and these cluster coalesce into larger clusters. You can google galaxy clusters
White holes?
No Tim, man's energy blew open the universe. I know this for a fact, and I can prove it. I have time, temperatures and equations, 13,888 on the dime. It's absolutely flat, the truth is amazing! I can not wait to share it with the world 🌍?
The 'bouncing universe' seems to me like the most logical pattern. Knowing the Laniakea supercluster is pulled to the, so called, Great attractor and all. Who knows how long this cycle may take, if its even true.
Laniakea is not gradationally bound. You can look it up on wiki
Hear me out… a lot of this is explained if we are in fact living in a simulation
A simulation answers nothing. All of the same questions remain, just moved up a level.
@@travr1131 how is it moved up a level? We have no idea what the physical constraints of the “parent” universe are. Perhaps they have completely different physical laws but simulated ours in the way they did to see the results.
@maxshuty right, but if the simulation writers exist, where did they come from? Even if their universe is different from ours, how did it come about? What came before their universe came to exist? Our universe being a simulation just kicks the can down the road, so to speak. The same questions remain.
@@travr1131 yup i agree. and something in the past has to be eternal, there's literally no way around it. other wise we will be kicking the can down an infinitely long road..
If there is a big crunch, I hope it's instantaneous. I don't want to see it coming.
When the big bang is always illustrated it goes out in a cone shape like it was shot down the barrel of a shotgun. But wouldnt it explode in a spherical shape going out in all directions.
Every vertical line on this "gunbarrel" diagram is a sphere with that line as its diameter.
We are not able to draw a 3 D sphere on a 2 D page and my telephone screen is certainly not capable of rendering 3 D images even though 3 D TV was a thing some years ago.
The big bang would have to be the most perfect sphere in the universe
@@silentvoiceinthedark5665
The Big Bang is an occurrence. It's not a physical, tangible thing.
Since we are unaware of what conditions are like beyond the universe in the greater Cosmos, any kind of shape of the universe, would be pure guesswork. We don't even know how many dimensions we are working with, in such a situation. Shapes may not even be a relative thing.
It's a fun thing to ponder, but unfortunately, there's little in the way of data.
🫥😶🤔
In 3 dimensions probably, but there are theoretically many other dimensions that only exist as our universe does. So yes in 3 dimensions it is a sphere but if you’re observing it from say the 5th dimensions who knows what shape that would take
Possibly because those cone diagrams include time as the x axis, in addition to describing the state. A sphere diagram would be much harder to read, those two descriptions together.
Obviously, anything that happened before the big bang is in a special category where time has no real meaning, however for me it seems more plausible that a death & rebirth situation happened instead of another universe just randomly bumping into ours, which just sounds ridiculous!.
Is there a way to simulate or to theorize that what caused the primordial black holes was the extreme bursts of energy generated by the matter antimatter annihilation, which then disturbed and caused the collapse of space-time in those particular spots?
I would not restrict the outcome of the universe to two possibilities a big rip for whatever else you thought of there are millions of possibilities in physics that could determine what happens.
We are bound to observe just until the visible horizon (unless the discovery of something completely new and extraordinary allows us to reach further). A lot of unimaginable things might have happened beyond it, of which we haven't the slightest clue. We live in a little visible universe (of 92 billion light years) in an incredibly vaster and unreachable cosmic sea.
Humans are just limited to the 3rd dimension. Time exists beyond it. Hence there's no way to go back or forward in time as a human.
According to the general theory of relativity time is linked with space forming the space-time matrix. The possibilities for a human of space-time travel are not foreseen, maybe are impossible for the reason of the cause and effect paradox.
@@neonboy1998well, you are just wrong. We CAN travel through time. Currently its thought we can only go forward, but some physicists think we will be able to go backwards eventually
[2D is not the center of the universe,
0D is the center of the mirror universe]:
The mirror universe theory is based on the concept of parity violation, which was discovered in the 1950s. Parity violation refers to the observation that certain processes in particle physics don't behave the same way when their coordinates are reversed. This discovery led to the idea that there might be a mirror image of our universe where particles and their properties are flipped.
In this mirror universe, the fundamental particles that make up matter, such as electrons, protons, and neutrinos, would have their charges reversed. For example, in our universe, electrons have a negative charge, but in the mirror universe, they might have a positive charge.
Furthermore, another aspect of the mirror universe theory involves chirality, which refers to the property of particles behaving differently from their mirror images. In our universe, particles have a certain handedness or chirality, but in the mirror universe, this chirality could be reversed.
Leibniz or Newton:
Quantum mechanics is more compatible with Leibniz's relational view of the universe than Newton's absolute view of the universe.
In Newton's absolute view, space and time are absolute and independent entities that exist on their own, independent of the objects and events that take place within them. This view implies that there is a privileged observer who can observe the universe from a neutral and objective perspective.
On the other hand, Leibniz's relational view holds that space and time are not absolute, but are instead relational concepts that are defined by the relationships between objects and events in the universe. This view implies that there is no privileged observer and that observations are always made from a particular point of view.
Quantum mechanics is more compatible with the relational view because it emphasizes the role of observers and the context of measurement in determining the properties of particles. In quantum mechanics, the properties of particles are not absolute, but are instead defined by their relationships with other particles and the measuring apparatus. This means that observations are always made from a particular point of view and that there is no neutral and objective perspective.
Overall, quantum mechanics suggests that the universe is fundamentally relational rather than absolute, and is therefore more compatible with Leibniz's relational view than Newton's absolute view.
What are the two kinds of truth according to Leibniz?
There are two kinds of truths, those of reasoning and those of fact. Truths of fact are contingent and their opposite is possible. Truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible.
What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus?
Newton's calculus is about functions.
Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints.
In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation.
In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation.
What are the arguments against Leibniz?
Critics of Leibniz argue that the world contains an amount of suffering too great to permit belief in philosophical optimism. The claim that we live in the best of all possible worlds drew scorn most notably from Voltaire, who lampooned it in his comic novella Candide.
In the natural number system, which includes zero and the positive integers, 1 is defined as the successor of 0. In other words, 1 is the next number after 0 in the natural number sequence.
Without zero, we would not have a starting point for the natural numbers, and therefore, we would not be able to define 1 as the successor of 0. So the existence of 1 is contingent upon the existence of 0, since 0 is the starting point from which we define the rest of the natural numbers.
In summary, 1 is contingent on 0 because 1 is defined as the successor of 0 in the natural number system, and without 0 as a starting point, we would not be able to define 1.
What is zero, anyway?
Our understanding of zero is profound when you consider this fact: We don’t often, or perhaps ever, encounter zero in nature.
Numbers like one, two, and three have a counterpart. We can see one light flash on. We can hear two beeps from a car horn. But zero? It requires us to recognize that the absence of something is a thing in and of itself.
“Zero is in the mind, but not in the sensory world,” Robert Kaplan, a Harvard math professor and an author of a book on zero, says. Even in the empty reaches of space, if you can see stars, it means you’re being bathed in their electromagnetic radiation. In the darkest emptiness, there’s always something. Perhaps a true zero - meaning absolute nothingness - may have existed in the time before the Big Bang. But we can never know.
Nevertheless, zero doesn’t have to exist to be useful. In fact, we can use the concept of zero to derive all the other numbers in the universe.
Kaplan walked me through a thought exercise first described by the mathematician John von Neumann. It’s deceptively simple.
Imagine a box with nothing in it. Mathematicians call this empty box “the empty set.” It’s a physical representation of zero. What’s inside the empty box? Nothing.
Now take another empty box, and place it in the first one.
How many things are in the first box now?
There’s one object in it. Then, put another empty box inside the first two. How many objects does it contain now? Two. And that’s how “we derive all the counting numbers from zero … from nothing,” Kaplan says. This is the basis of our number system. Zero is an abstraction and a reality at the same time. “It’s the nothing that is,” as Kaplan said.
He then put it in more poetic terms. “Zero stands as the far horizon beckoning us on the way horizons do in paintings,” he says. “It unifies the entire picture. If you look at zero you see nothing. But if you look through it, you see the world. It’s the horizon.”
Once we had zero, we have negative numbers. Zero helps us understand that we can use math to think about things that have no counterpart in a physical lived experience; imaginary numbers don’t exist but are crucial to understanding electrical systems. Zero also helps us understand its antithesis, infinity, in all of its extreme weirdness.
Why not a third alternative that a creator created the universe?
Because scientists tend to use science which requires provable facts, observation, and testing. If it didn't, it wouldn't be science. It'd be magic or faith, which is best left to others.
So a multiverse from nothing is science?@@zeuslgn
@@MHajyounes
Science is a technique for investigation that requires evidence. Faith shuns investigation and evidence in favor of a biased belief.
We have no idea what existed before the Big Bang or where all the energy/matter in it came from and likely never will.
That doesn't mean we choose to give up on investigating it and just chalk it up to magic unicorn farts just because that makes us feel good or some ancient dead guys wrote some stories that said so.
Mixing faith with science is counterproductive. Like mixing cotton candy in your pasta dinner. You can, but it'll be awful.
Great video! Are we going to see any new "Exoplanets" videos any soon?
But why is / was there energy?
How did the Big Crunch cycle begin tho?
Flat? So our universe could be sandwiched in between two other universes, perhaps they colided, creating our universe
Finally 🎉
Well the simulation noted by our Great scientists suggests it as human brain (cosmic web) like structure, but what's between our brains neurons space, what is that
Or what is our head boundry
I like your videos
what if the reason for the average temperature is quantum entanglement... I have 0 qualifications for this but just a theory. if everything in the known universe was once within an area 1 billionth of a particle, would it not be possible that it was all connected and then when it separated it would still have that connection? my understanding of quantum entanglement is that two subatomic particles can be liked together even throughout an infinite distance, still being able to communicate with each other instantaneously. could it be possible that all of the particles were connected at a point in time, making them still connected till this day? just a theory
Well, we certainly have all the time in the world for us, the human race, to discover the entire vast cosmic sea.
i love your videos!!!!!!!
They haven't said that. They've only just brought back samples. Why lie
God give me actual understanding about universe
Before our known Big Bang, the universe or space must have existed in a state of absolute nothing. A true empty void without limits. Unlimited potential where anything is possible.
You can't get something from nothing.
@@jdawsome4899 Ahh yes, that old chestnut. But then how could any of the primordial matter, the sub-atomic particles and elements, the building blocks, that went on to form everything for the big bang and the universe have always existed beforehand? All that matter had to have started out life from somewhere in the distance past. It wouldn't have just always infinitely been there.
@@stephencollins8739 God is timeless and can do all things. Simple.
@@jdawsome4899 Ahh yes, another old chestnut. If we can't explain it, religion and God is the answer. 🙄
@@stephencollins8739 it takes more faith to believe that something came from nothing than to believe in a creator behind the created. Did you see the person who made your car? The universe is the only thing on this planet where people have to see it to believe it.
In my room i never saw anything forming in the air ,how the big bang formed from void
Where did the bomb come from to start things going?
ahh my daily dose of sleep medicine
Trust the scienc!
I'm just wondering if anyone could understand if they believe if it's possible the cell came before the big bang and why they believe so and if they believe if the microscopic cell mightve been created first and it created the uni erse
Is the narrator a real person or a computer voice?
Sounds like the kurzgesagt guy
Real I believe
From all the videos I have watched about the big bang the only conclusion I have come to about the universe is anything is possible statistically as long as time is infinite. Given enough time something can rise from nothing 🧠
Boltzmann brain ?
No beginning and no ending
You sound like the guy from Kurzgesagt.
I have never believed in the Big Bang Theory as an explanation for the origin of the universe. It's completely speculative and specious. Just as ants / insects / all animal species on Earth will never know that Earth is just one of 8 planets in our solar system, or there is such a thing call solar system, we humans will simply never know what is the origin of the universe, as it's beyond the realm of our understanding. We can't even find an answer to the cliched question - what came first - the chicken or the egg ?
The egg came first. A bird similar to a chicken laid it but through evaluation it changed.
@@drewstewart5716 Nice. So where did That bird come from ?
Destiny have made a video about life and the evolution of life watch it out
@@munwarumrani3465 Yes, have watched it. The documentary by Attenborough on Netflix is way better yet my primary questions remain unanswered. Humans / no one can ever figure out how our universe came to be. Big Bang is just total BS.
if you can think about it, you can make it
The big bounce, eh?
So I haven’t watched this vid as of yet, but I was thinking about this just the other day; before the Big Bang everything was in one location, all the matter in the universe, and apparently it was like this for an infinite amount of time …but really I think it would be more appropriately called an indefinite amount of time, if it was infinite it would never have changed? I was thinking that it seems that most people think of the big bag as if they are external to this concentrated ball of matter (assuming it was spherical, don’t know why just makes sense?), but you could never have been external because everything in the universe was in that one location, including all the matter that makes you you. So it must have been as hot as hot can be inside this location, because gravity would be insanely high, and everything would be so tight there must have been some friction or something that made everything get really hot, leading to a massive explosion creating the Big Bang …but how did all that matter get there in the first place? Maybe it was a Universe before, and somehow all the matter got pulled together, like an impossibly big black hole? What if it’s a cycle, and the Universe sort of recycles itself? Maybe it’s done this many many times before?
😂😂 love how you make sure to point out you HAVEN’T watched the video yet but throw out your theory which, wait for it, was mentioned in the video & you just so happened to be pondering about it a plank moment before this video was uploaded!! Genius Genius Genius!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
@@shawna.4601 😂 It’s true! And I am going to watch it, just think it’s strange I’ve been thinking about it lately is all 😂 …wish I was a genius.
…watched it, and it hurt my brain! 🤯
@@gapster77 Love em but they hurt my brain too! The universe is such a fascinating, crazy & interesting place, I’m surprised more ppl aren’t into it cuz I want to know all her secrets
@@shawna.4601 Agreed. The future of the Human Race is dependant on us leaving Earth. Humans used to stand on beaches staring at the Ocean, wondering if there was anything over the horizon. All that’s changed is the brevity of it, we stand on the shoulders of those that academically made a difference to Humanity, as a species we are equipped with the tools to soon set out, to explore and map the Solar system, to eventually traverse the ocean of stars, to seek out new wonders. To seed our Galaxy. We will encounter other forms of life, and maybe we will find other star sailers in the void?
17:00 the music sounds like blade runner 2049
How many absurd things people say and invent.
The universe and the "nature" follows rules that guarantee its stability and expansion.
Everything, every life, every movement of an atom follows rules.
The right question then would be, not how the universe was formed but where all these rules/laws come from!
Maybe from chaos, as science says?
If this were the case, only due to the quantity of laws that govern the entire universe and its other dimensions, that 10^-∞ (10 to the power of minus infinity) possibility that everything could have been created by chance would have occurred!
Think people think!
If I can only see the visible universe , but we know it's much bigger. Now if that's the case how do we see the light from the beginning? Shouldn't that beginning light be way out at the edge way passed our visible universe ? Never made sense to me at all
My Theory Is There Was No Big Bang The Universe Was Always Here And There’s No End To It ,It Goes Forever Ever In Any Direction !!!
You just explained God. Good job!
@@jdawsome4899no, no they didnt. An infinite Universe doesnt need a creator. In fact it pretty much debunks the idea of a creator. It means it has ALWAYS existed, and ALWAYS will.
@@drewmadenew3000 So, where will u go after life?
all evidence shows that the universe had a beginning and that its not eternal. somthing in the past is eternal though, but the universe doesnt fill the bill.
@@iamBlackGambit "all evidence" does NOT point to a beginning. SOME evidence, maybe even a lot, but there is plenty pointing towards an eternal universe, that's objective fact.
The big bang supposes all materia we know of was at one point as small as a human being..
When someone crushes the moon down to the size of an atom i’ll start believing the big bang theory.
If u crushed a moon down to the size of an atom it would become a blackhole
No one knows and I doubt that anyone will ever know!
Where did the Big Bang happen?
Where was the accumulation of matter/energy at the exact moment when the Big Bang began?
once again, it is said to all start from some random stuff, the real question is how it THAT there. The creation of the universe is beyond our comprehension and can not be explained scientifically or by a human being
Wat made the big bang
Not many people agree, but I've always thought *black holes* are a conduit to another universe.
It does sound like a reach, but consider that ......
The birth of the universe it a huge explosion of matter .... Now matter doesn't just appear from nowhere and it has to be reconstituted/recycled, so what if the big bang is the birth of a *black hole,* resulting in the birth of a new universe?
What if the matter from that big bang is material the black hole, that has been consumed from from planets, stars etc, and reconstituted into the universe created by the *black hole?*
The cycle continuing infinitum, which also lends credence to the many worlds theory.
A black hole imploding is the big crunch, the death of that universe.
Since there are so many black holes, it means that the material it being passed down through each black hole, and in turn through each black hole is countless black holes that form, continuing forever which again the multiverse theory, with the hypothesis that it consists of an infinite universe with infinite earths.
I hope I've been able to explain it well enough as to not confuse anyone.
But the similarities of the life and behaviour of black holes and the life and behaviour of universes are unnervingly paralleled and kind of match up.
The universe has to be infinite. For it not to be the endless dark empty space would have to come to an end and be replaced by...... what? What could replace the space? It has to be eternal because the alternative is that there used to be nothing and then something came into existence. You can't get something from nothing so there must always have been something - hence no beginning.
right! theres where an eternal creator comes in, evidence shows that the universe had a beginning.
@@iamBlackGambit The opposite is true!
@@iamBlackGambitwho created the eternal creator? And who created the creator of the eternal creator?
@@TheeliteMMA-ms4vz if you knew what eternal means, you'd know your question is irrelevant.
@@iamBlackGambit It means something that lasts forever, that has nothing to do with anything. All matter in the universe is eternal, you’re saying something had to create the Big Bang and I’m saying something had to create God.
ok, i'm confused. you say dark energy is whats causing the universe to expand faster but then you say "dark energy's relentless push eventually overwhelms gravity's pull"... why would the universe suddenly start contracting? i'm sorry but you're contradicting yourself.
Here is my thhought...if matter cannot be created nor destroyed...where the hell this all this matter come from...and the big bang bull shit does not hold water and lots amount of energy would have been needed...where did tgis energy come from? Have we forgotten the conservation of mass law? And what triggered this mass explosion...
No answers
How did we get here? Who put the universe exactly there where it is? It cant just form from something. Someone have to put something to somewhere to exist there. Or our brains just cant handle it? But i want answers
But someone can’t just appear from nothing can they?
@@TheeliteMMA-ms4vz Yes, someone or something cant appear from nothing. Someone have to put something to somewhere so that something can exist in that place. Like Big Ben, people built it and now its there, but without people it would never exist there. I hope you understand what i mean xd
Answer= we don't know
Nobody truly knows.
Was There Anything Before The Big Bang?
Yes... Three dates and a bottle of wine.
صرف وڈیو بنانے سے حقائق سامنے نہیں لائے جا سکتے ۔
Relax. Dont be afraid. Its nothing worse than death. And we all die. Dont be scare. Everything is going well. It hurt a little, but then its over. Belive me. Im pissed of.
Subhan allah in his creation everything in a perfect order and place there is no way the entire universe came from a coincidence very perfectly set up like this it's definitely a divine power only that's behind the trigger" for the universe formation the more i wonder and watch this videos the more i get stronger in my faith❤
Inflation and collapse are underway, have you been to a grocery store recently?
Before the universe there was god
The title doesn't make much sense since it uses a theory and not a fact when mentioning this "big bang" word. The big bang is fiction, but worse it's not even science fiction
I think a fairy in the clouds is more fiction imo
Was there a big bang?
It means we are not real
Some people's imaginary friend made it !
Is this channel a.i powered??
God is the answer
🙏🙏🙏
Perhaps it was just God creating the Big Bang.
And maybe the earth is flat 🤣
In the beginning there was nothing and then there was existence, in the end there is nothing, so there is nothing to understand but nothing. Let’s just party while we exist.
😮woq
It doesn’t make any sense to me that people can believe in such simple and irrational explanations the Bible gives for the universe’s creation. You can believe that light was simply spoken into existence yet have to flip a switch to that uses electricity to power a lightbulb? You don’t speak the lights on. You don’t create life by using your own ribs. Life’s to complicated to have been so simple to create. 😊
That's stupid 💯🤦♂️✝️
God spoke LET THERE BE LIGHT!!!! BOOOOOOM and that’s how it begun He is all mighty
There is no god
We don't know either way. Both to me are religion.
We have a believer, an atheist and an agnostic in here
And another atheist
That's what the cult says yes
Second
Allah was there.
First
Yes,there was something before the Big Bang. John 1:1- In the beginning, there was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God. Put your faith in the creator of the universe and all that is in it.His name is Jesus, and if you trust in him, your sins will be forgiven, and your lives will never be the same! God bless you all ❤🙏🏿
Amen
God believers and lovers won’t like this video 😂😂😂 they don’t believe in the Big Bang 😂😂
Yes greta say climate change did this....sheesh
My theory is that gravity compressed a mass of particas , comprising them so dence it creates a perfect combination of fusion it explodes and the gravity repelles like a elastic band pulling the mass to the edge of the universe. By H Welsh Valley comando dj society. TM !
God is great
Quantum information, Quantum entanglement,
Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality,
Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge.
Spacetime emerge, Mathematics Emerge, Holographic principal.