📌 FIND ONE HERE: bit.ly/3rBZT4x • bit.ly/3RLCIPT 🔓 Missed something? OPEN the description box ABOVE. You'll find it! 🆘 Hit THANKS☝to highlight your Question + give thanks for the help you receive! ☝ NO Links, Self Promotion, or Personal Info. Please stay on topic and be respectful.
Hi Andrew - if I put my Onkyo RZ-50 in pure direct mode, would I not have a ton of more functionality for $1200.00 vs an $1800.00 strictly 2.1 amp with nowhere near the functionality? What are yours and Kristie's thoughts?
@@Audiomainia2310 Well, if you require 5.1 Home Theater, the Onkyo makes more sense. I don't know about "more functionality". For stereo music alone, the 1000A does as much and with better (and more stable) power and fidelity than the Onkyo. The Onkyo cannot handle 4 ohm loads and lower with grace. This more or less comes down to the use of a very beefy 2 channel class A/B power supply vs. a switching class D that is asked to handle 11(!) channels.
Thank you, Andrew and Kristi for this timely video! I really wish more stereo receivers or integrated amps would come with HDMI given the convenience for movies & TV. At the end of the day, I just want a nicely constructed piece of HiFi equipment that is pleasant to look at and listen to, while being able to pull double duty for our entertainment room.
It’s dumb to think y’all are a ‘lone wolf’ because this is an amazing community. Thankful for your commitment to all your viewers. This channel is my only ‘must watch’ audio channel.
@@chrisveltman1795 Hmm, interesting. Appreciate you letting me know. FWIW, Kristi and I don't shy away from communication and/or collaboration, it's just that we're either a) never asked or b) have been other creators' punching bag for years which makes it hard to want to participate in a back-n-forth. We love this community though --especially you all here in the comments! I'm very proud of what we've built together!
they didn’t mention y’all by name. They just were celebrating their recent subscriber Memberships. And then stating that Darko didn’t want to increase his subscriber numbers. Because no one wants to be the Lone wolf.
Thanks! I forgot to mention the subwoofer output is a an excellent addition. Most speakers you review that interest me would benefit from a sub woofer i.e. Q Acoustics 5040 and such. If I want a truer surround sound I think a sound bar like the Samsung Q 990 C will be a good compliment.
Happy Birthday from Romania! Would the R-N2000A or A-S1200 drive the KEF R11 Meta in the same way as the RN-1000A, even though both have less power than the R-N1000A into 4 ohms? I own a pair of KEF R7 Meta and am looking for an A-S1200 or RN2000A to pair them with. How well do they match in terms of power and tonality? What other amplifier do you suggest at the same level of price to get the best sound from the KEF R7 META?
You should be just fine. You may note better instrument and musical separation with the slightly higher end 2000A or A-S1200 over the 1000A. Thank you for your support and apologies for my delayed reply. Have a great day!
Two weeks ago i just bought rn 800a available in Europe (same specs like 1000A minus HDMI)amazing sound and i have all conection that i need. YPAO do great job with audio setup on my small living room(you can adjust all setings after from music cast) ,i am very happy with him..keep listening !
I bought the R-N2000A based on your previous review and love it. It is hooked up with B&W 705 s2 and SVS 3000 sub. Yup it’s a sweet sound. But now Kef R11 are in the future.
I definitely need HDMI. I want to build a stereo system that can be used for 2-channel music as well as TV. I originally was thinking of getting the 7000A, but after seeing this review, the Yamaha is now my top pick for an integrated amplifier for this use case
Damn, it's so refreshing to see a review on UA-cam where I don't get a sales pitch thrown at my face at all cost. Especially the discussion with Kristi shows that the tested product really isn't the main focus - the sound quality and user experience is. I really admire this ethos. 😎👍
Thanks for the video. I have just bought an R-N800A, which is identical to the R-N1000A. I don't need HDMI. I'm really looking forward to seeing how the new amplifier performs in my living room after it replaces the old 20-year-old Yamaha RX-V100 D receiver.
Impressive product... I was surprised by Kristi's impression. The Yamaha N1000A has a lot in common with the A-S801 integrated amp. Kristi was not as enthusiastic with that. The N1000A does offer pre-amp outputs and apparently discards the subwoofer filter. Those are improvements! YPAO and HDMI offer benefits, but not for this two channel guy. FWIW we use a basic A-S301 that replaced Adcom separates when the GTP-500 refused to be repaired. The A-S301 cost less than the attempted repairs for the Adcom. Lesson learned... Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA
I think you're starting to see a real choice being offered to the consumer now. Like the Yamaha, the new Marantz Stereo 70s (2.1) vs the Marantz Cinema 70s (7.1) - single HMDI and high(er) output vs multiple HDMI with more speaker outputs (with a sacrifice in power and ultimate audio quality?)|| Each group can now optimise for their own preferences. It would be interesting to understand the compromises / advantages of these choices in more detail.
Yamaha has what I waited for. Tone Controls! Built in Phono pre amp! Meters! HDMI 🕺 I had held off on Audio Lab because I just couldn’t break from having tone controls. Now I can upgrade from my 80’s Yamaha Go figure. But what about the built in streamer? I use Apple music and Prime music through my TV to my receiver now. Is Music Cast as good as some stand alone streamers? Always enjoy your reviews. Clear and concise info always
The streamer is good and its implementation within the app was flawless for us. It doesn't support Apple Music natively, but you can Airplay/BT or use the HDMI and a TV/AppleTV as a work around.
I’m a bit late today, but I’ve got thoughts lol: 1) HDMI today is a must in any integrated amplifier for me. Those who think you need everything separately, then go separates? Integrated should be fully capable of doing whatever you want from it aside from making you dinner. HDMI is a must. 2) I think audiophiles (not all of them, but a lot of them) have been holding this hobby hostage, with their stubbornness and their inability to accept progress and change. That needs to stop and we’re seeing more and more brands realizing it and starting to go out there like this Yamaha. 3) I’m absolutely going to choose a cheaper integrated from the same brand if it’s performance sonically is 90% of the top dog yet the price is 50-60%. That’s awesome, we need to see more products like this and especially with tons of features built in. 4) Awesome review as usual! I think this piece of gear is an absolute steal. Especially when you compare it to Rotel S14 and that price… Hope everyone is having a lovely Sunday!
hdmi input is fantastic to cover one scenario: optical disk player, with output hdmi-audio only; as there is one (reavon) that covers almost all scenarios, from CD/SACD, DVD-Audio, and maybe Bluray-Audio, it is even good to handle movie sound; and the power to move loudspeakers of 8ohms at 110-220w is an eye opener.
I have this product, I upgraded from a 6000a and features on this are just way better, being able to level match the DB on the inputs is SO handy! the loudness control is something I use a lot also and I feel that more companies should add to their products, the only thing I was slightly upset with was the phono preamp compared with the previous audiolab, however this I intend on upgrading regardless so nothing I’m losing sleep over! Interested to see your comparison with the technics, as that was my other option but the wattage was something I was really worried about and also I thought it might be more ‘clinical’ sounding, very happy with my Yamaha!
Sonically, how much of an improvement over the 6000A? I personally have the 6000A with a node 2i but I really want a receiver with HDMI arc. Let me know what you think please!
I'm taking long look at the Yamaha amps (receivers) This 1000 is a good value. The "2000" looks cool but has high price. Then the purer "1200" & "2200" Integrated Amps -- also of interest. Right now I'm between this "1000" level (but no meters, sadly) but size easier to deal with - as well as price. Or maybe stretching to get a "2200" at the best price I can find (even if I have to wait for a "special") I have a Yamaha last 22 years -- the RX-777. It's a good Receiver, and better once broken-in for a year or two. (I expect these newer Yamahas will also benefit by a good long break-in period.)
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Yeah, I'm not sure why someone would not like that. I would imagine because it signals home theater and there are some that don't like HT? I'm one of those audiophiles that has a hybrid 2-channel and HT system and would love to have HDMI on my preamp!
Your talk about HDMI being digital reminds me of reading people bashing optical in favor of digital coax back in the day. I suspect this was driven by cable companies trying to push ridiculously expensive digital cables. Audiophiles are weird. I’m glad there’s a bigger push for measurement data in recent years. Anyway. Love your channel. I’m not at all in the market for this product but watch anyway.
Every time I have used the Yamaha proprietary correction, it never sounds better than when I manually tune it when understanding all in every single setting of the equipment running through it in a way of trial and air to the ear plus previous knowledge of things, 100% of the time that always works out better and I wonder how many people just plug in the mic run its test and assume it's going to be better than anything that you can do? I'm here to tell you that is an incorrect assumption in a very large way! Appreciate the video as always keep up the great work!
Good afternoon friends! I watched a few hours ago, but had to run out right after. This was a fun video, and very well done. Is it odd that the biggest draw to me is the variable loudness setting? I always enjoyed the option on my vintage receivers that I started out with. I hope you have a great one!
Also for Dirac, it was a real gift from the universe (and the Swedish DSP algorithm wizards). As a person who's room has 2 huge almost +10dB peaks between 40 and 60hz (with a +5db "dip" between them) and then several +3-5dB peaks (and small dips) in the 100-200hz area, the implementation of Dirac took my 2.1 systems (connected to my TV with an HDMI 😉) sound to a whole different level. Even my mother would notice such a vast difference.
@Andrew Robinson If you could choose between a used Marantz model n40 for around the same price as a new Yamaha R-N1000a which one would you pick? Another great review by the way. This is in my opinion the best channel around hifi. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Belgium
In my case, using Dali Zensor 7 and REL T/7i, ypao did an amazing job. I feel like I have different speakers now. Amazing mid-range, which I didn't have earlier.
Thank you both so much for this review. I have now found my all in one solution to purchase this Yamaha 1000 to pair with my Klipsch rp 600m that I will receive tomorrow. P.S Love your channel and look forward to seeing more reviews. ❤
For me personally Yamaha has always made professional products not just in their hi-fi equipment but generally anything they touch. I think HDMI port is a handy thing to have, plug in your television or even just putting a HDMI Blu-ray player to your system is very handy feature. I think this product in the 2 channel market will be very popular, Yamaha could be considered to be a little bit cautious in the way they present their products. But in saying that you know you are going to get a reliable and enjoyable product for the money you spend. Andrew, I’d love to see you do a video on centre channels speakers, I think this is a topic that homes hi-fi thesis would love to have your feedback!
@@LeezahB I don't make a direct comparison to the 40N in either video, but it is comparable and a good option that would totally round out my TOP 3. Don't give your 40N a second look, it's good and you bought a great product!
Great review. I won't consider any new device that doesn't support HDMI ARC these days. I'm slightly disappointed that Yamaha continues to not support Chromecast built-in in many of their devices. Luckily, as you mention, the MusicCast app is quite good and includes most music streaming services. Question! In your opinion, does the R-N1000a sound greatly better than the Yamaha's Aventage (AVR) line around this price range (A4A, A6A)? For me personally, if the sound quality isn't a huge improvement, frugal me could regret getting this receiver over the additional diversity/flexibility of features offered by the Aventage line.
Im old school but when my old Marantz amp died I bought a new Yamaha AVR to connect to my new TV. I started using Tidal on my Google TV and connecting it to my AVR eARC using straight mode is fantastic. I added a small sub to my Kef towers and now I only listen to music in straight mode 2.1 on Tidal through my TV. Thanks for your inspiration.
Big question I have - how does this compare to the similarly priced RX A4A? In the past you were a big proponent of AVRs for stereo/music with room correction being a main factor, and now there is the hybrid solution within the same price range (rn2000a being a lot more expensive). So should those of us considering 2(.1) setups for streaming and television who’d like some room correction still consider the RXA4A, or go straight for the rn1000a? And would that, in terms of quality (not just “waste of input space”), be a better choice? Or do AVRs, besides expandability, still have aces up their sleeves?
Marantz just came out with the same type of amp called “the stereo 70” I bought it from Marantz about 6weeks ago. I don’t think Marantz has it out to the dealers yet. I have the Yamaha A-S 801 and like the amp a lot but no ARC or pre-outs. The new Marantz is awesome if you like that little warmer sound signature.
Wow! Finally a full-featured amp under 1000€ that's not a class D mini amp (Bluesound Edge). Marantz finally understood that most people just want HDMI eARC + Streaming + Sub Out in an amp. Everything else is gravy.
HDMI is such a good connection. I have an R-N803 and I love a whole bunch about it. But keep pulling it out of my system because it does not have HDMI. This looks like something I would replace it with for sure. All the same functionality but add the HDMI connection. The HDMI connection is hard to live without in a modern living room.
Yamaha has always been my go to recievers. Don't laugh, but my current Yamaha is a RS 202, with blutooth and RCA inputs. I have a older node 2i as a streamer, and some Klipsch R51M speakers. Running a optical out from the TV to the node, and both my mac mini M1 ( with a Apple headphone dongle as my dac), and my PC using RCA's. I still listen to CD's with a NAD 542. I have a Monoprice flat 10" sub. This all old school hookups, the sub with speaker level hookup as well. The set up sounds fantastic! I really don't see a need to upgrade. The one thing about Yamaha recievers, amps is that they just last. Living in socal without A/C I don't worry aboot them overheating etc. as far as sorround I left that station years ago. I just enjoy a simple 2.1 setup.
Yamaha is great right down to their simplest A/V receiver for which I have been using the Yamaha RX - V375 for at least 9 years ~ It has all the HDMI I need to connect everything I own Apple TV etc and although it might not be up to date to Andrew & Kristy standards I'll wait for this sucker to blow up before buying a newer AV receiver ~ I'm more of an audiophile than a videophile my audio room is more up to date than my video living room ~ If you are looking for value I can stand behind my own purchase of a Yamaha products ~ This Amp looks great although limited in it's execution ~ Another great review by A&K ~ Keep up the good work guys ~
Andrew, Happy New Year. Are you planning to review the LAiV Harmony DAC and its other peripherals? Or will you wait until they also release their GaN amp and streamer and review them all together? If it's as good as they say it is I wish other companies like Yamaha will also adapt their separates model and sell HiFi components in parts but in the same line, so it's easier on the wallet to slowly upgrade to a top tier end game setup that all match visually and sonically. Instead of blowing all the money upfront for a all in one integrated that will potentially have lesser sound quality.
After upgrading to an audiphoæe product with HDMI eArc Everyone on the household enjoy the sound and usability of the primary sound system. HDMI eARHc is such a gamechanger. Add tidal/Spotify connect and Chromecast you are in heaven.
I think if you are going to have optical and digital coax, then HDMI should also be included. 10 years ago I was very naive to the entire DAC drama (and in some ways it was a better world) However, I also applaud Yamaha for building some very analog integrated amps and hope they don't drop that line. I have a 5.1 system for the TV and I like an analog 2 channel music system where I supply the streamer and DAC for music. Some of this isn't from the analog purist mindset, I get burned out on buying an expensive do everything integrated just to want eARC a few years later and... Then needing to buy a new integrated. When the power and sound of the old amp is still very nice. A modular design is also nice if a component is obsolete or fails, I can get another DAC, another streamer. I applaud NAD for modular design in the aspect of planning for new inputs. I don't swap out systems often and I despise planned obsoletion.
R-N800A don't have HDMI eArc, R-N1000A have double bottom chassis, metal feet and minor changes to some components. I have R-N800A and it's great for the mony, if u don't want the hdmi
I'm in a serious quandary over this! This is an excellent product for all the reasons you mentioned. I was prepared to purchase the Adiolab after careful consideration until I saw this review. The conflict arises in terms of the visual impact these two have on me. As an artist, the Audiolab wins hands-down! The Yamaha quite frankly looks like an orthopedic shoe by comparison. So........ Decisions, decisions. I have my work cut out for me.
I assume Yamaha doesn't kindly provide an extra review unit for comparison, but what a lot of people is wondering is what the real world use / sound quality difference is between the cheaper R-N800a and this one. What do you get for $500 and 1Kg more? (Yes, squinting at the back panel photos, the 800a has no HDMI, 2 coaxs (1000a has 1), and an AM antenna)
Nice Review, I tried this, and had Yamaha S801 and Marantz Model 40n. Bought the Marantz, for me it's wasn't close. Marantz had a natural tone, better sounding features and was more powerful (ignore the specs). the 1000 was ok but sounded more like class D, thin and flat, and not like the 801. 801 has elevated treble and elevated boomy base. Just my impressions...
I came to the comment section to see if that question had been asked. Normaal whenever Kristi mentioned people might want to know about ome more comparison, it will be whatever I had in mind. Not this time though.. What do the two of you think?😊
I am told the N800A is close the the 1000A regarding the sound. I dont need the HDMI so i dont know if you got a chance to look at it or got any feedback. thanks
Thanks a lot for this great review, you're the best and thank you Kristi for convincing me i don't need the 2000a , mostly for us Canadians, i can't justify paying 700$ of taxes for that, 5500$ total...3000$more than it's little brother here... Even my 500$ Yamaha avr receiver is surprising after adjusting the equalizer manually. Thanks again and take care.
Andrew, Kristi, good review and very high production quality. I own a Nuprime IDA8 integrated. Nuprime reviews are hard to find but all their amps, dacs, etc. I have listened to eo far were amazing. Any chance you consider the brand in the future? Keep up your hard work, it is greatly appreciated.
AFAIK, the Yamaha network receivers do not support gapless playback. They also do not support scrubbing within a song. I have these issues on my 2000A and Yamaha verified it in a support request. It's fixable with either a firmware or MusicCast (or both), but Yamaha has not done so for 10+ years. WiiM fixed their gapless issue in weeks after a Darko video mentionioned it. If WiiM can do it, Yamaha with their billions in revenue certainly can - and may do so, so it's not hopeless. Also, it must be known that Yamaha chose to use Bluetooth 4.2 when BT 5.x has been available for years. Maybe it doesn't matter, but hey...
Looking forward to the comparison to the Technics in the future. Though I do wonder how the predicted bankruptcy of Panasonic is going to affect Technics as a company. Or if it even will happen at all. They seem to be on a roll with their lineup! And this Yamaha looks great too. It's a great time for audiophiles. This or the Technics with a pair of Lintons is classic style with modern features.
Dear Andrew! And dear anyone else reading and commenting on this. I’m about to buy myself a stereo setup. I will be streaming and playing vinyl, and I think I have settled on the Monitor Audio Silver 100 speakers. So now I have to decide on the amp and this is where I would love some advice. Powernode N330 with the Bluesound Hub or Yamaha rn1000a? I’ve seen dozens of reviews and they both seem like good systems. Please guide me, wise people of the internet ❤
Can I speculate that the sound of the 1000a may derive from the EI transformer like the 801 has than the tordial of the 200a and audiolabs? I have a 1200a and an audiolab 6000a but sometimes I prefer my son's 701a
Well Yamaha is good and all. But I’m thinking about something smaller. Would u consider doing a review of miniDSP FLEX? It’s a give me that their room correction is good. What about their pre amp. The numbers look incredible. But do they sound good?
Your UA-cam is absolutely awesome and educational. Question: do you ever test jazz such as songs on UA-cam called greatest collection Whiskey Blues relaxing Whiskey Blues music?
Thanks for excellent review. I love the combination of simplicity of design but with beasty top quality components inside like the NADs in the good old days 👍🏻 Yamaha seems to be back on track☺️
I bought a Cambridge axr100 and i run a digital in from my tv with a 2.1 system including Kanto y6 passives and a 10" Monoprice sub, Another digital comes from my 4k blu-ray player for movies, And I have hdmi put from the tv to a Polk 400 atmos soundbar. I can plat both the 2.1 and the soundbar at the same time and it sounds fantastic for my needs in movies and when i listen to music i just go back to 2.1. I may buy tower speakers at some point, but im not sure if i really need them anymore!
Thank you for this super great review. This channel is my favourite channel to go to and listen to. What I am now interested in, is how it will compare sound wise to the new Marantz stereo 70S. As I am in the market for a new receiver this Christmas and I think it will come to these two.
Well some many manufacturers are listening. Kudos to all of them. I have always been a fan of Yamaha and their products. HDMI is here and now. Gone are the day of using RCA out’s from your TV to your stereo just to get better sound. Plus there usually no sub-out on these products. I am curious if they included their famous Pure Direct button and if so what did you find. Thanks a bunch. Totally worth it.
[To @Robinsonbrand] Thanks for reviewing the Yamaha N1000a. I've loved Yamaha since I bought my first receiver in the late 70s. QUESTION: For high-performance audio lovers who would enjoy watching/listening occasionally to a movie on their 2-channel oriented equipment, does the N1000a create a competent virtual center channel? (NOTE: We're talking about audio systems with good speakers capable of creating a reasonably good soundstage.) Thanks again.
If i have a lot of vinyl and a great set up do i choose this or a Matanz40n? Bigger soundstage is my favorite. I get 30% off Marantz but i love the features on the Yamaha. I don’t know why everyone doesn’t have a usb in dac
Great video! Thank you Andrew and Kristi. Been following you guys since 20k subscribers. You guys came a long way! Almost 350k subscribers ! One question though. Do you know if the sub output is defeated in pure direct mode?
Thanks for this review Andrew! Just at this moment looking for a 2-channel with HDMI so looking forward to your review on the Marantz Stereo 70S! There is also the Onkyo 8270! Like to see a double feature on these maybe? Great channel!!
was there a big difference when you tried the cambridge audio streamer, and has music cast finally added tidal connect? i used to own the rn803D but changed for cambridge audio cxa 81 with the magic dag200 and a wimmpro. but i still like the yamaha sound and the 2000n is out of reach for me. so thanks for this great review i think yours is the first, love what you guys are doing
Thank you for the great review Andrew! But here is a question: Is there any reason I should prefer RN1000A over the RX-A4A (it's an AV, but I'm just thinking of stereo configuration)? The first one retails for $1,799 and the latter for $1,299 (there is a discount currently, but even without it it's still cheaper), while it has output power of 110 watts per channel and Also gives you the flexibility to build your surround system if you wish. Are there any fundamental differences in these Amps that make the RN1000A better for music? I am no hi-fi specialist, so probably will not notice minor differences in the sound. And another question: did you have a chance to run PolkAudio R700 on one of these receivers/amps? How did that go? :) (was there enough power?)
Completely agree that the integration of HDMI is, and should be, a normal state for HiFi components at THE END OF 2023! I feel it's just such a missed opportunity when companies don't do it for some reason..
If i have a lot of vinyl and a great set up do i choose this or a Matanz40n? Bigger soundstage is my favorite. I get 30% off Marantz but i love the features on the Yamaha
Hi thanks for a great review. If you had to choose between the yamaha rn1000a vs the as801 with a good streamer like the eversolo. What would be your choice?
Thank you for the great review! With so many options available, it's becoming pretty difficult to choose. How does the Yamaha R-N1000 compare to the Marantz 40n?
Has anyone compared this to the A-S1200? Is it similar sonically to it? If I have a node should I just get the 1200? Or get rid of the node and go with the RN1000A?
Hi, Andrew , beautifull voice from the person who help you in this review, you are a lucky man , compare this 1000A to the a-s701 or 801, you can find a better sonic performance in the 1000A ? One amp is from 2014 the other is 2023 , yamaha have improved the sound in 9 years ? I own a 701 .
Depends what you like. The Lintons (I own a pair which are connected to a 2000A) are *relatively* warm sounding. If the 1000A is a "bit bright*, then the Linton''s slight warm character would be neutralized. IMO, it would be a good match. If you are over 50 (our hearing degrades over time), I wouldn't hesitate.
This looks like the amp that could make everyone in my family happy. Currently using the A11 Tribute with a (hidden) Node. But if this existed back when I bought my system, Yamaha would be getting my money. One comparison that interests me…40n vs rn-1000a? Who gets your money?
Lured by the price I was about to buy this Yamaha amp. But then I had a listen of few demoes of this amp and I decided to buy Marantz 40n instead. Yamaha did sounds did not sound well to my ear. That does not mean it is not good for you, give it a listen before buying.
Thanks for the review as always! interestingly the Audiolab 9000A can be had for the same price as the N1000a here in Sweden. The 7000a is almost 40% less expensive.... and the 6000a is over 60% cheaper But the Yamaha seems to be a good overall package but listening to what you are saying it feel like the Audiolab signature is the one for me at least
📌 FIND ONE HERE: bit.ly/3rBZT4x • bit.ly/3RLCIPT
🔓 Missed something? OPEN the description box ABOVE. You'll find it!
🆘 Hit THANKS☝to highlight your Question + give thanks for the help you receive!
☝ NO Links, Self Promotion, or Personal Info. Please stay on topic and be respectful.
Hi Andrew - if I put my Onkyo RZ-50 in pure direct mode, would I not have a ton of more functionality for $1200.00 vs an $1800.00 strictly 2.1 amp with nowhere near the functionality? What are yours and Kristie's thoughts?
@@Audiomainia2310 Well, if you require 5.1 Home Theater, the Onkyo makes more sense. I don't know about "more functionality". For stereo music alone, the 1000A does as much and with better (and more stable) power and fidelity than the Onkyo. The Onkyo cannot handle 4 ohm loads and lower with grace. This more or less comes down to the use of a very beefy 2 channel class A/B power supply vs. a switching class D that is asked to handle 11(!) channels.
1250 euros today !!!
Thank you, Andrew and Kristi for this timely video! I really wish more stereo receivers or integrated amps would come with HDMI given the convenience for movies & TV. At the end of the day, I just want a nicely constructed piece of HiFi equipment that is pleasant to look at and listen to, while being able to pull double duty for our entertainment room.
It’s dumb to think y’all are a ‘lone wolf’ because this is an amazing community. Thankful for your commitment to all your viewers. This channel is my only ‘must watch’ audio channel.
Appreciate you (and everyone) but may I ask what prompted the "lone wolf" comment? Not upset, just curious!
The beginning of the recent CAM/Darko collab. An assumption on my part, but I don’t know who else theyd be talking about.
@@chrisveltman1795 Hmm, interesting. Appreciate you letting me know. FWIW, Kristi and I don't shy away from communication and/or collaboration, it's just that we're either a) never asked or b) have been other creators' punching bag for years which makes it hard to want to participate in a back-n-forth. We love this community though --especially you all here in the comments! I'm very proud of what we've built together!
they didn’t mention y’all by name. They just were celebrating their recent subscriber Memberships. And then stating that Darko didn’t want to increase his subscriber numbers. Because no one wants to be the Lone wolf.
@@chrisveltman1795 Well, so long as I have Kristi and all of you there ain't nothing "lone" about what we do here 😉
Thanks! I forgot to mention the subwoofer output is a an excellent addition. Most speakers you review that interest me would benefit from a sub woofer i.e. Q Acoustics 5040 and such. If I want a truer surround sound I think a sound bar like the Samsung Q 990 C will be a good compliment.
This plus a Q990C for movies would be a really great and easy one-two punch!
Happy Birthday from Romania! Would the R-N2000A or A-S1200 drive the KEF R11 Meta in the same way as the RN-1000A, even though both have less power than the R-N1000A into 4 ohms? I own a pair of KEF R7 Meta and am looking for an A-S1200 or RN2000A to pair them with. How well do they match in terms of power and tonality? What other amplifier do you suggest at the same level of price to get the best sound from the KEF R7 META?
You should be just fine. You may note better instrument and musical separation with the slightly higher end 2000A or A-S1200 over the 1000A. Thank you for your support and apologies for my delayed reply. Have a great day!
Two weeks ago i just bought rn 800a available in Europe (same specs like 1000A minus HDMI)amazing sound and i have all conection that i need.
YPAO do great job with audio setup on my small living room(you can adjust all setings after from music cast) ,i am very happy with him..keep listening !
I bought the R-N2000A based on your previous review and love it. It is hooked up with B&W 705 s2 and SVS 3000 sub. Yup it’s a sweet sound. But now Kef R11 are in the future.
I definitely need HDMI. I want to build a stereo system that can be used for 2-channel music as well as TV. I originally was thinking of getting the 7000A, but after seeing this review, the Yamaha is now my top pick for an integrated amplifier for this use case
There are many things to like in your reviews but I appreciate your willingness to compare products/brands definitively. Thanks.
Thanks!
I bought it along with Klipsch RP 8000 II. Couldn’t be happier.
Your reviews were really helpful.
I have my Yamaha n2000a used as preamp to the Yamaha 3200 and I love it! More than my Luxman! Can't go wrong with Yamaha higher tier amps.
Damn, it's so refreshing to see a review on UA-cam where I don't get a sales pitch thrown at my face at all cost. Especially the discussion with Kristi shows that the tested product really isn't the main focus - the sound quality and user experience is. I really admire this ethos. 😎👍
Thanks for the video. I have just bought an R-N800A, which is identical to the R-N1000A. I don't need HDMI. I'm really looking forward to seeing how the new amplifier performs in my living room after it replaces the old 20-year-old Yamaha RX-V100 D receiver.
Hello, I'm planning to buy R-N800A, how about your experience, if you can describe little bit please
Thanks in advance
Yes, would like to hear from you
Impressive product... I was surprised by Kristi's impression. The Yamaha N1000A has a lot in common with the A-S801 integrated amp. Kristi was not as enthusiastic with that. The N1000A does offer pre-amp outputs and apparently discards the subwoofer filter. Those are improvements! YPAO and HDMI offer benefits, but not for this two channel guy. FWIW we use a basic A-S301 that replaced Adcom separates when the GTP-500 refused to be repaired. The A-S301 cost less than the attempted repairs for the Adcom. Lesson learned...
Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA
I think you're starting to see a real choice being offered to the consumer now. Like the Yamaha, the new Marantz Stereo 70s (2.1) vs the Marantz Cinema 70s (7.1) - single HMDI and high(er) output vs multiple HDMI with more speaker outputs (with a sacrifice in power and ultimate audio quality?)||
Each group can now optimise for their own preferences.
It would be interesting to understand the compromises / advantages of these choices in more detail.
Yamaha has what I waited for. Tone Controls! Built in Phono pre amp! Meters! HDMI 🕺 I had held off on Audio Lab because I just couldn’t break from having tone controls. Now I can upgrade from my 80’s Yamaha Go figure. But what about the built in streamer? I use Apple music and Prime music through my TV to my receiver now. Is Music Cast as good as some stand alone streamers?
Always enjoy your reviews. Clear and concise info always
The streamer is good and its implementation within the app was flawless for us. It doesn't support Apple Music natively, but you can Airplay/BT or use the HDMI and a TV/AppleTV as a work around.
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsahh guess I will still be using the Apple TV but via HDMI now. That works
This review put me over the top, just ordered mine!!!
I’m a bit late today, but I’ve got thoughts lol:
1) HDMI today is a must in any integrated amplifier for me. Those who think you need everything separately, then go separates? Integrated should be fully capable of doing whatever you want from it aside from making you dinner. HDMI is a must.
2) I think audiophiles (not all of them, but a lot of them) have been holding this hobby hostage, with their stubbornness and their inability to accept progress and change. That needs to stop and we’re seeing more and more brands realizing it and starting to go out there like this Yamaha.
3) I’m absolutely going to choose a cheaper integrated from the same brand if it’s performance sonically is 90% of the top dog yet the price is 50-60%. That’s awesome, we need to see more products like this and especially with tons of features built in.
4) Awesome review as usual! I think this piece of gear is an absolute steal. Especially when you compare it to Rotel S14 and that price…
Hope everyone is having a lovely Sunday!
hdmi input is fantastic to cover one scenario: optical disk player, with output hdmi-audio only; as there is one (reavon) that covers almost all scenarios, from CD/SACD, DVD-Audio, and maybe Bluray-Audio, it is even good to handle movie sound; and the power to move loudspeakers of 8ohms at 110-220w is an eye opener.
I have this product, I upgraded from a 6000a and features on this are just way better, being able to level match the DB on the inputs is SO handy! the loudness control is something I use a lot also and I feel that more companies should add to their products, the only thing I was slightly upset with was the phono preamp compared with the previous audiolab, however this I intend on upgrading regardless so nothing I’m losing sleep over! Interested to see your comparison with the technics, as that was my other option but the wattage was something I was really worried about and also I thought it might be more ‘clinical’ sounding, very happy with my Yamaha!
Sonically, how much of an improvement over the 6000A? I personally have the 6000A with a node 2i but I really want a receiver with HDMI arc. Let me know what you think please!
I'm taking long look at the Yamaha amps (receivers) This 1000 is a good value. The "2000" looks cool but has high price. Then the purer "1200" & "2200" Integrated Amps -- also of interest. Right now I'm between this "1000" level (but no meters, sadly) but size easier to deal with - as well as price. Or maybe stretching to get a "2200" at the best price I can find (even if I have to wait for a "special")
I have a Yamaha last 22 years -- the RX-777. It's a good Receiver, and better once broken-in for a year or two.
(I expect these newer Yamahas will also benefit by a good long break-in period.)
Admittedly diehard audiophile here, I think having HDMI integration is fantastic! Wish I had it. All for it, 100%.
Well hello, stranger!
It's not the evil connection I think a lot of people think it is, or that it was many, many years ago. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts.
@@KristiWright Hi there, Kristi! I am always here, never miss a video!!!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Yeah, I'm not sure why someone would not like that. I would imagine because it signals home theater and there are some that don't like HT? I'm one of those audiophiles that has a hybrid 2-channel and HT system and would love to have HDMI on my preamp!
@@garganega the HDMI on the XD3-A has major bugs and I don't recommend you use it.
Your talk about HDMI being digital reminds me of reading people bashing optical in favor of digital coax back in the day. I suspect this was driven by cable companies trying to push ridiculously expensive digital cables.
Audiophiles are weird. I’m glad there’s a bigger push for measurement data in recent years.
Anyway. Love your channel. I’m not at all in the market for this product but watch anyway.
Guys, I just love your presentation! Clear, precise and to the point. Did I mention entertaining? I do like the fact that the Yamaha is a 2.1 system.
Thanks so much!
Every time I have used the Yamaha proprietary correction, it never sounds better than when I manually tune it when understanding all in every single setting of the equipment running through it in a way of trial and air to the ear plus previous knowledge of things, 100% of the time that always works out better and I wonder how many people just plug in the mic run its test and assume it's going to be better than anything that you can do? I'm here to tell you that is an incorrect assumption in a very large way! Appreciate the video as always keep up the great work!
Good afternoon friends! I watched a few hours ago, but had to run out right after. This was a fun video, and very well done. Is it odd that the biggest draw to me is the variable loudness setting? I always enjoyed the option on my vintage receivers that I started out with. I hope you have a great one!
Also for Dirac, it was a real gift from the universe (and the Swedish DSP algorithm wizards). As a person who's room has 2 huge almost +10dB peaks between 40 and 60hz (with a +5db "dip" between them) and then several +3-5dB peaks (and small dips) in the 100-200hz area, the implementation of Dirac took my 2.1 systems (connected to my TV with an HDMI 😉) sound to a whole different level. Even my mother would notice such a vast difference.
HDMI is want I want!!! Definitely interested in this amp! Love the aesthetics
Good morning I enjoyed the video this morning. Hope you guys have an awesome week
Thanks so much! Same to you!
@Andrew Robinson
If you could choose between a used Marantz model n40 for around the same price as a new Yamaha R-N1000a which one would you pick?
Another great review by the way. This is in my opinion the best channel around hifi. Keep up the good work.
Greetings from Belgium
The best is to audition both amps next to each other.
In my case, using Dali Zensor 7 and REL T/7i, ypao did an amazing job. I feel like I have different speakers now. Amazing mid-range, which I didn't have earlier.
Thank you both so much for this review. I have now found my all in one solution to purchase this Yamaha 1000 to pair with my Klipsch rp 600m that I will receive tomorrow. P.S Love your channel and look forward to seeing more reviews. ❤
For me personally Yamaha has always made professional products not just in their hi-fi equipment but generally anything they touch.
I think HDMI port is a handy thing to have, plug in your television or even just putting a HDMI Blu-ray player to your system is very handy feature.
I think this product in the 2 channel market will be very popular, Yamaha could be considered to be a little bit cautious in the way they present their products. But in saying that you know you are going to get a reliable and enjoyable product for the money you spend.
Andrew, I’d love to see you do a video on centre channels speakers, I think this is a topic that homes hi-fi thesis would love to have your feedback!
Love having options for integrated amps that have so much built in!
Me too! Be sure to stay tuned for part two next Sunday.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews❤
@@andrewrobinsonreviewswill you compare with the Marantz Model 40N?
@@LeezahB I don't make a direct comparison to the 40N in either video, but it is comparable and a good option that would totally round out my TOP 3. Don't give your 40N a second look, it's good and you bought a great product!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews thanks Andrew!!!🥰💖
Great review. I won't consider any new device that doesn't support HDMI ARC these days. I'm slightly disappointed that Yamaha continues to not support Chromecast built-in in many of their devices. Luckily, as you mention, the MusicCast app is quite good and includes most music streaming services. Question! In your opinion, does the R-N1000a sound greatly better than the Yamaha's Aventage (AVR) line around this price range (A4A, A6A)? For me personally, if the sound quality isn't a huge improvement, frugal me could regret getting this receiver over the additional diversity/flexibility of features offered by the Aventage line.
I was thinking the same thing!
Im old school but when my old Marantz amp died I bought a new Yamaha AVR to connect to my new TV. I started using Tidal on my Google TV and connecting it to my AVR eARC using straight mode is fantastic. I added a small sub to my Kef towers and now I only listen to music in straight mode 2.1 on Tidal through my TV. Thanks for your inspiration.
AVRs can 100% be hifi products. Glad you found a solution that works for you!
Big question I have - how does this compare to the similarly priced RX A4A? In the past you were a big proponent of AVRs for stereo/music with room correction being a main factor, and now there is the hybrid solution within the same price range (rn2000a being a lot more expensive). So should those of us considering 2(.1) setups for streaming and television who’d like some room correction still consider the RXA4A, or go straight for the rn1000a? And would that, in terms of quality (not just “waste of input space”), be a better choice? Or do AVRs, besides expandability, still have aces up their sleeves?
Marantz just came out with the same type of amp called “the stereo 70” I bought it from Marantz about 6weeks ago. I don’t think Marantz has it out to the dealers yet. I have the Yamaha A-S 801 and like the amp a lot but no ARC or pre-outs. The new Marantz is awesome if you like that little warmer sound signature.
Our review of the Stereo 70 is in the works.
Wow! Finally a full-featured amp under 1000€ that's not a class D mini amp (Bluesound Edge). Marantz finally understood that most people just want HDMI eARC + Streaming + Sub Out in an amp. Everything else is gravy.
HDMI is such a good connection. I have an R-N803 and I love a whole bunch about it. But keep pulling it out of my system because it does not have HDMI. This looks like something I would replace it with for sure. All the same functionality but add the HDMI connection. The HDMI connection is hard to live without in a modern living room.
Yamaha has always been my go to recievers. Don't laugh, but my current Yamaha is a RS 202, with blutooth and RCA inputs. I have a older node 2i as a streamer, and some Klipsch R51M speakers. Running a optical out from the TV to the node, and both my mac mini M1 ( with a Apple headphone dongle as my dac), and my PC using RCA's. I still listen to CD's with a NAD 542. I have a Monoprice flat 10" sub. This all old school hookups, the sub with speaker level hookup as well. The set up sounds fantastic! I really don't see a need to upgrade. The one thing about Yamaha recievers, amps is that they just last. Living in socal without A/C I don't worry aboot them overheating etc. as far as sorround I left that station years ago. I just enjoy a simple 2.1 setup.
Yamaha is great right down to their simplest A/V receiver for which I have been using the Yamaha RX - V375 for at least 9 years ~ It has all the HDMI I need to connect everything I own Apple TV etc and although it might not be up to date to Andrew & Kristy standards I'll wait for this sucker to blow up before buying a newer AV receiver ~ I'm more of an audiophile than a videophile my audio room is more up to date than my video living room ~ If you are looking for value I can stand behind my own purchase of a Yamaha products ~ This Amp looks great although limited in it's execution ~ Another great review by A&K ~ Keep up the good work guys ~
Except for the 7200, it is difficult to remember previous integrated reviews. Thanks for including some.
Thanks!
You bet!
Andrew, Happy New Year.
Are you planning to review the LAiV Harmony DAC and its other peripherals? Or will you wait until they also release their GaN amp and streamer and review them all together?
If it's as good as they say it is I wish other companies like Yamaha will also adapt their separates model and sell HiFi components in parts but in the same line, so it's easier on the wallet to slowly upgrade to a top tier end game setup that all match visually and sonically. Instead of blowing all the money upfront for a all in one integrated that will potentially have lesser sound quality.
After upgrading to an audiphoæe product with HDMI eArc Everyone on the household enjoy the sound and usability of the primary sound system.
HDMI eARHc is such a gamechanger. Add tidal/Spotify connect and Chromecast you are in heaven.
I think if you are going to have optical and digital coax, then HDMI should also be included. 10 years ago I was very naive to the entire DAC drama (and in some ways it was a better world)
However, I also applaud Yamaha for building some very analog integrated amps and hope they don't drop that line. I have a 5.1 system for the TV and I like an analog 2 channel music system where I supply the streamer and DAC for music.
Some of this isn't from the analog purist mindset, I get burned out on buying an expensive do everything integrated just to want eARC a few years later and... Then needing to buy a new integrated. When the power and sound of the old amp is still very nice. A modular design is also nice if a component is obsolete or fails, I can get another DAC, another streamer. I applaud NAD for modular design in the aspect of planning for new inputs. I don't swap out systems often and I despise planned obsoletion.
Alright! Happy sunday to ya once again!!!
Happy Sunday indeed, AND at the right time 😂
😄
I own one for a couple of months now. So far I really like it. But the plastic knobs are close to killing it for me. Once you know, you know. :)
Maybe a heavy duty nylon knob would be a good compromise solution ?
You can change the knobs ,I do it on mine .
the less expensive R-N800A has the same Sabre ES9080Q DAC and is also 100 w 20-20khz. do you know what the differences would be?
R-N800A don't have HDMI eArc, R-N1000A have double bottom chassis, metal feet and minor changes to some components.
I have R-N800A and it's great for the mony, if u don't want the hdmi
thank you@@milad.m2130
I'm in a serious quandary over this! This is an excellent product for all the reasons you mentioned. I was prepared to purchase the Adiolab after careful consideration until I saw this review. The conflict arises in terms of the visual impact these two have on me. As an artist, the Audiolab wins hands-down! The Yamaha quite frankly looks like an orthopedic shoe by comparison. So........ Decisions, decisions. I have my work cut out for me.
lul yeah, it also possibly took long to arrive
I assume Yamaha doesn't kindly provide an extra review unit for comparison, but what a lot of people is wondering is what the real world use / sound quality difference is between the cheaper R-N800a and this one. What do you get for $500 and 1Kg more? (Yes, squinting at the back panel photos, the 800a has no HDMI, 2 coaxs (1000a has 1), and an AM antenna)
Had the exact same question 😅
Danke! 🎶🍻
Thank you!
How does NAD C3050 compare to Yamaha 1000a?
Nice Review, I tried this, and had Yamaha S801 and Marantz Model 40n. Bought the Marantz, for me it's wasn't close. Marantz had a natural tone, better sounding features and was more powerful (ignore the specs). the 1000 was ok but sounded more like class D, thin and flat, and not like the 801. 801 has elevated treble and elevated boomy base. Just my impressions...
You have to get what works for you. Your take away of all of the amps' "sound" seems to align with ours.
The 40N gets my vote over the S801. I honestly did not care for the 801.
@@KristiWrightHello , what about this yamaha vs marantz 40n?
I came to the comment section to see if that question had been asked. Normaal whenever Kristi mentioned people might want to know about ome more comparison, it will be whatever I had in mind. Not this time though.. What do the two of you think?😊
I am told the N800A is close the the 1000A regarding the sound. I dont need the HDMI so i dont know if you got a chance to look at it or got any feedback. thanks
Thanks a lot for this great review, you're the best and thank you Kristi for convincing me i don't need the 2000a , mostly for us Canadians, i can't justify paying 700$ of taxes for that, 5500$ total...3000$more than it's little brother here...
Even my 500$ Yamaha avr receiver is surprising after adjusting the equalizer manually.
Thanks again and take care.
Glad we could help give you a bit more peace of mind.
I love yamaha. I have two Japanese made Yamaha guitars and love them. This will be my next amp.
Love the new intro!👍
I'm glad you like it
Andrew, Kristi, good review and very high production quality. I own a Nuprime IDA8 integrated. Nuprime reviews are hard to find but all their amps, dacs, etc. I have listened to eo far were amazing. Any chance you consider the brand in the future? Keep up your hard work, it is greatly appreciated.
Had to google the company, but looks really interesting!
AFAIK, the Yamaha network receivers do not support gapless playback. They also do not support scrubbing within a song. I have these issues on my 2000A and Yamaha verified it in a support request. It's fixable with either a firmware or MusicCast (or both), but Yamaha has not done so for 10+ years. WiiM fixed their gapless issue in weeks after a Darko video mentionioned it. If WiiM can do it, Yamaha with their billions in revenue certainly can - and may do so, so it's not hopeless.
Also, it must be known that Yamaha chose to use Bluetooth 4.2 when BT 5.x has been available for years. Maybe it doesn't matter, but hey...
I have an R-N303D and its a great box. One box solutions keep on improving.
Thank you for that section on room correction! It was very detailed and I think it also helped me understand my system a little better.
Glad it helped!
Looking forward to the comparison to the Technics in the future. Though I do wonder how the predicted bankruptcy of Panasonic is going to affect Technics as a company. Or if it even will happen at all. They seem to be on a roll with their lineup!
And this Yamaha looks great too. It's a great time for audiophiles.
This or the Technics with a pair of Lintons is classic style with modern features.
7 seconds.. Even the false isn't that fast. Always happy to see you post something Andrew.
"false"? Thanks for tuning in and enjoy the video!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews sorry I meant the flash... stupid autocorrect.
@@blakkboxx4246 Ahh, that makes more sense.
Agree with the comment this is a must watch channel. The quality never fades.
Sincerely appreciate that!
Dear Andrew!
And dear anyone else reading and commenting on this. I’m about to buy myself a stereo setup. I will be streaming and playing vinyl, and I think I have settled on the Monitor Audio Silver 100 speakers. So now I have to decide on the amp and this is where I would love some advice. Powernode N330 with the Bluesound Hub or Yamaha rn1000a?
I’ve seen dozens of reviews and they both seem like good systems. Please guide me, wise people of the internet ❤
Can I speculate that the sound of the 1000a may derive from the EI transformer like the 801 has than the tordial of the 200a and audiolabs? I have a 1200a and an audiolab 6000a but sometimes I prefer my son's 701a
I have been looking for my perfect "new"receiver for 3 yrs. This is on the way thank you!
Amazing product! Yamaha made an integrated that I had to build with separates.
Out of curiosity how do these stereo amps compare to receivers like the cinema 40 or others in that price range etc for stereo?
Thanks! HDMI rules in so many ways.
Well Yamaha is good and all. But I’m thinking about something smaller. Would u consider doing a review of miniDSP FLEX? It’s a give me that their room correction is good. What about their pre amp. The numbers look incredible. But do they sound good?
Cyrus are half width & sound really good to me. However even here in UK are not cheap 🎶
Your UA-cam is absolutely awesome and educational. Question: do you ever test jazz such as songs on UA-cam called greatest collection Whiskey Blues relaxing Whiskey Blues music?
Thanks for excellent review. I love the combination of simplicity of design but with beasty top quality components inside like the NADs in the good old days 👍🏻 Yamaha seems to be back on track☺️
I bought a Cambridge axr100 and i run a digital in from my tv with a 2.1 system including Kanto y6 passives and a 10" Monoprice sub, Another digital comes from my 4k blu-ray player for movies, And I have hdmi put from the tv to a Polk 400 atmos soundbar. I can plat both the 2.1 and the soundbar at the same time and it sounds fantastic for my needs in movies and when i listen to music i just go back to 2.1. I may buy tower speakers at some point, but im not sure if i really need them anymore!
We need more HDMI inputs 😊
Thank you for this super great review. This channel is my favourite channel to go to and listen to. What I am now interested in, is how it will compare sound wise to the new Marantz stereo 70S. As I am in the market for a new receiver this Christmas and I think it will come to these two.
I bought the 1000A and hooked up with a pair of Triangle Borea 9's. Very impressive.
Well some many manufacturers are listening. Kudos to all of them. I have always been a fan of Yamaha and their products. HDMI is here and now. Gone are the day of using RCA out’s from your TV to your stereo just to get better sound. Plus there usually no sub-out on these products. I am curious if they included their famous Pure Direct button and if so what did you find. Thanks a bunch. Totally worth it.
Pure Direct on the 1000A is great!
[To @Robinsonbrand] Thanks for reviewing the Yamaha N1000a. I've loved Yamaha since I bought my first receiver in the late 70s. QUESTION: For high-performance audio lovers who would enjoy watching/listening occasionally to a movie on their 2-channel oriented equipment, does the N1000a create a competent virtual center channel? (NOTE: We're talking about audio systems with good speakers capable of creating a reasonably good soundstage.) Thanks again.
Good question!
Kristy I always love your perspective on reviewed products. Love your content.
If i have a lot of vinyl and a great set up do i choose this or a Matanz40n? Bigger soundstage is my favorite. I get 30% off Marantz but i love the features on the Yamaha. I don’t know why everyone doesn’t have a usb in dac
Great video! Thank you Andrew and Kristi. Been following you guys since 20k subscribers. You guys came a long way! Almost 350k subscribers !
One question though. Do you know if the sub output is defeated in pure direct mode?
The sub is active in Pure Direct mode according to the manual but YPAO and all tone controls are inactive (again, according to the manual).
@andrewrobinsonreviews, M1 or the Yamaha RN1000?
@@stefanradu8640 @andrewrobinsonreviews…. I’d also love to know this
Me to!
Thanks for this review Andrew! Just at this moment looking for a 2-channel with HDMI so looking forward to your review on the Marantz Stereo 70S! There is also the Onkyo 8270! Like to see a double feature on these maybe? Great channel!!
was there a big difference when you tried the cambridge audio streamer, and has music cast finally added tidal connect? i used to own the rn803D but changed for cambridge audio cxa 81 with the magic dag200 and a wimmpro.
but i still like the yamaha sound and the 2000n is out of reach for me. so thanks for this great review i think yours is the first, love what you guys are doing
This amp plus Decware OB’s seems intriguing for a less expensive set up.
Thank you for the great review Andrew! But here is a question: Is there any reason I should prefer RN1000A over the RX-A4A (it's an AV, but I'm just thinking of stereo configuration)? The first one retails for $1,799 and the latter for $1,299 (there is a discount currently, but even without it it's still cheaper), while it has output power of 110 watts per channel and Also gives you the flexibility to build your surround system if you wish. Are there any fundamental differences in these Amps that make the RN1000A better for music? I am no hi-fi specialist, so probably will not notice minor differences in the sound. And another question: did you have a chance to run PolkAudio R700 on one of these receivers/amps? How did that go? :) (was there enough power?)
Completely agree that the integration of HDMI is, and should be, a normal state for HiFi components at THE END OF 2023! I feel it's just such a missed opportunity when companies don't do it for some reason..
100% agree! Thanks for watching!
Thanks for the great and insightful videos@@andrewrobinsonreviews!
If i have a lot of vinyl and a great set up do i choose this or a Matanz40n? Bigger soundstage is my favorite. I get 30% off Marantz but i love the features on the Yamaha
Hi thanks for a great review. If you had to choose between the yamaha rn1000a vs the as801 with a good streamer like the eversolo. What would be your choice?
Thank you for the great review! With so many options available, it's becoming pretty difficult to choose. How does the Yamaha R-N1000 compare to the Marantz 40n?
Has anyone compared this to the A-S1200? Is it similar sonically to it? If I have a node should I just get the 1200? Or get rid of the node and go with the RN1000A?
This amp is a gem at the price it is.
Hi, Andrew , beautifull voice from the person who help you in this review, you are a lucky man , compare this 1000A to the a-s701 or 801, you can find a better sonic performance in the 1000A ? One amp is from 2014 the other is 2023 , yamaha have improved the sound in 9 years ? I own a 701 .
Wonder how this would pair with the Wharfedale Lintons…?
Same here
Depends what you like. The Lintons (I own a pair which are connected to a 2000A) are *relatively* warm sounding. If the 1000A is a "bit bright*, then the Linton''s slight warm character would be neutralized. IMO, it would be a good match. If you are over 50 (our hearing degrades over time), I wouldn't hesitate.
@@billd9667Thank you for your reply 😊
This looks like the amp that could make everyone in my family happy.
Currently using the A11 Tribute with a (hidden) Node.
But if this existed back when I bought my system, Yamaha would be getting my money.
One comparison that interests me…40n vs rn-1000a? Who gets your money?
The 40N is great and I could be happy with either. Stay tuned NEXT WEEK for my final verdict 😉
@robinsonbrand I wonder the same thing this Yamaha vs Marantz 40n . Thank you
@@andrewrobinsonreviewslooking forward to next week’s show!
@@chrisveltman1795 it's one of my favorites of the year (so far).
Fab review. Thank you! 🙃
Lured by the price I was about to buy this Yamaha amp.
But then I had a listen of few demoes of this amp and I decided to buy Marantz 40n instead. Yamaha did sounds did not sound well to my ear. That does not mean it is not good for you, give it a listen before buying.
I just got one and think I will return it. Sounds thin to my ears. My old Marantz nr1403 sounds better.
@ I went for Lyngdorf TDAI-1120 in the end. It has superb room correction. Good sound with KEF-R3 Meta.
Marantz is crap compared to yamaha
@@amateurcyclists3857 I was hoping it would sound great but it didn't. Maybe just a bad unit, but I tried.
Thanks for the review as always!
interestingly the Audiolab 9000A can be had for the same price as the N1000a here in Sweden. The 7000a is almost 40% less expensive.... and the 6000a is over 60% cheaper
But the Yamaha seems to be a good overall package but listening to what you are saying it feel like the Audiolab signature is the one for me at least