Dan Henry Watches... I'm Still Not Totally Impressed.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
- thetimetellers...
My Watchmaker: www.tictocwatc...
Affiliate links to some great watch gear:
Watch Tool Kit: amzn.to/2XoqM8x
Spring bar kit: amzn.to/2CRdw2G
Barton sailcloth strap: amzn.to/2rTZ0oQ
Hadley roma ostrich strap: amzn.to/2XnUCdi
Mancave leather rally strap: www.etsy.com/s...
Caliper tool: amzn.to/37oXIT8
Poly watch: amzn.to/2Ktc2Qn
Microfiber cloth: amzn.to/2OnaloT
Watch Roll: amzn.to/35hNzWx
Watch Pod: amzn.to/2Ok5e97
Wolf carrying case: amzn.to/2XvoHb6
A Man And His Watch: amzn.to/2prIAmF
G-Shock DW5600: amzn.to/2OpRfyz
www.amazon.com...
I own two Dan Henry's. For the price, you get good quality and a beautiful watch. I find that is Dan Henry's selling point: vintage looking and aesthetically pleasing at a fair price. I love you man but you sometimes seem to forget that not everyone (always) has a larger budget to buy actual vintage and / or the ability or desire to properly service or care for the watches. Just my two cents.
Hamilton has some vintage inspired pieces that are just incredible...and it has a real movement, not a quartz i can find in a Fossil. Dan Henry is not cheap for what they provide.
@@brianhsin678 Again though, Hamilton costs a lot more than Dan Henry! With this DH you get a nice looking piece for under $300. A Hamilton Intra-Matic will set you back $2,000+. It’s a totally unfair comparison.
@@redletterl78 Bulova Lunar Pilot>Orient Neo 70's >Seagull 1963>Tissot V8 Chronograph > Seiko Prospex speedtimer all have more chops than DH.
@@brianhsin678 seiko speedtimer is a banger of a watch no matter the tier.
For real, with the new 1975 release, a ton of people are mentioning how TTT doesn't like them, and I could already guess why. Surprise, most people don't actually want to own a vintage watch, that can die at any second and usually has low quality glass or a ton of wear.
If you live in a country like mine. Norway when the sun never go down in the summer and never rise in the vinter a 24 hour dial is very much aprichiated.
The why the Russians make so many for Arctic expeditions. Love Norway BTW :-) Except for the beer prices!
@@unixnerd23 The prices isnt too bad i think for us but i see what you mean😅
An all-nighter or a late night out could seriously screw up your internal clock those places :D
@@kris4733 Yes it does😄you now it is terrible when it is mid day when you come out of the bar at 0300 at night😅
@@unixnerd23 True. Also when a single country spans 11 time zones, plus maybe keeping track of European business centers or fishing ships out to sea, 24 hour dials, second time zone and World timer bezels are handy :)
From the owner of DH 1962 perspective I must say that even now - 1,5 year after a purchase I’m glad I did it. I like not only the glass (that catches some flaws while being used), a well balance dial and tiny details that build up the watch. I like the approach to the customer as well - e-mail replied within Shirt period of time, openness to customers’ needs. If I was to buy this watch again I would probably do so.
I have 3 Dan Henrys and I do understand the negatives. I wish they had sapphire or acrylic, milled clasps but overall they are great. No worries about maintenance, just good looking easy grab and go watches with really nice vintage vibes that don’t cost a bundle. I see some watch snobs are hating on them but many of us like having inexpensive no hassle options in our collections, for me these fit the bill.
Vintage aesthetics with a modern, reliable movement at a very affordable price. What’s not to like?
That's my take. But watch collecting is so personal there really is no wrong way to go about it.
They didnt pay him enough
Exactly! Dan Henry the man is a true horologist with an enviable watch collection. The watches he offers are based on many of the watches in his collection. They are tributes and homages more than direct copies of any specific watch, and they are offered to collectors and watch enthusiasts at very reasonable prices considering the level of quality offered. Honestly, I'd rather add a Dan Henry to my collection over a Seiko which still inexcusably has chapter ring and/or bezel alignment issues, or other quality control issues no one should find acceptable at this price point. What's not to like about Dan Henry?
I just hate the brand’s name…”Dan Henry” “Christopher Ward” it’s so weird
Their customer service is the worst I ever dealt with
Seen a lot of others that had problems too
He's comparing the DH to an Axios and Beaufort, which cost double the DH. This isn't a valid comparison.
I have a silver dial version. Not only is it super cool looking, especially on the ultra-comfy BOR bracelet, but the Seiko Chrono is the jam! No fuss. No extra steps. Just start/stop/reset with ease and quite accurate. But the STAND OUT feature is DH Customer Service. I wrote asking to buy a new solid end for the bracelet. I bought the watch pre-owned so I was expecting to pay for the items. Dan Henry, himself, replied and sent a set of links ...no charge. He said he wanted everyone who owns one of his watches to have full access of customer service. Jory may not be totally impressed, but I am.
That is pretty cool.
Respect for DH!
They lost the panda I ordered from them, 3 months for getting an refund…never again.
If Dan Henry had sent this in for review, it would be.. in fact.. a spec monster
Yup. Boldr watches are soooo great. And free to TTT. I generally unsubscribed for reasons such as this review.
@@bluesdog645 ikr, Boldr is Soo crap
Lmfaooo 🤣🤣
Imo hes an honest man who won't lie and give a false review.
I've gotten the most compliments for the dan Henry panda watch in my collection.
As you should, it's a gorgeous watch got myself one aswell
I have it on my wish list, congratulations
@@larsstougaard7097 1 note though. The bracelet is very difficult to resize
Are people stopping you in the street?
@@dannemannen18 similar to an axe ad
I own three Dan Henry watches. I love them. I can't live without my Oris watches and I can't live without my Dan Henry watches. DH's design team is top tier!
As someone who owns this exact watch, I’ll give you that all your points are pretty valid. That being said, this watch was a graduation present from my parents when I got my bachelor’s, so it has a special place in my collection.
sometimes that's all that matters to be honest. 👍
My Dad was into watches, used to explain to me as a kid about automatic movements. Sadly, he never could afford them. When he died he left several quartz watches. Only one could I get going and wear. It will always be my prized watch. If I knew back then what I know now, I would have found a way to get him a nice automatic.
I think it was well chosen and a great beginning to a successful and fulfilling life and career! Cheers!
@@blasien1 your Dad sounds really cool, awesome memories I bet ✝️🇺🇸🤙🏻
I honestly don’t understand the statements such as “garbage’ when reading the comments on watch reviews. If you don’t like it, say so but please don’t insult the people that love their watch. This watch is not garbage and there are quite a few things to admire. I love chronos, but don’t like the Dan Henry watches particularly as I prefer a watch with heritage. But that is only me ... I own a Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chrono, which I adore, but many people dislike, which is fine.... each to his own.
True.
calling a thing garbage is not insulting someone. And you shouldnt take it so personally.
@@jaer.6540 Thanks for the reply. I don’t take it personally, it is just very rude.
@@thejupiter2 Bingo!
@@thejupiter2 There’s that rudeness to which Eddie referred. He posts an honest opinion; you act like a dick. There’s a difference.
Dan Henry watches are in a niche by themselves. Are they homages? Yes. But many are homages to watches you will never own or even see in the wild. It would be nice to own a chronograph from the 1930s but what are the odds you find one in decent condition? How much will the service costs be if you damage it? Would it even be fixable?
Yeah I loved his comment about "I'd rather just buy a vintage watch" like yeah dude, just go and buy a Rolex Daytona Panda or in the case of his 1939, just go and buy a 1930s patek chrono?
Dan Henry‘s concept could not be more clear: the functionality and looks of vintage design classics without the headache and at entry level prices. You buy them because you want the design. So did I with the DH 1970 (which is a near-exact replica of a 1967 Exactus Supercompressor) and I could not be happier: super-cool, no-nonsense, authentic vintage style, great case finishing, great lume, and most importantly: authentic 40mm size.
Do I think that a $300 Seiko (“with only a mineral crystal” - and garbage bracelet) looks better under a loupe? Probably. Is it a viable alternative? Certainly not. I don’t mind you pointing out manifest execution defects, yet your consistently annoyed tone of voice and nitpicking, as if DH was somehow pretentious or dishonest, does indeed come across as snobbish and more of an ego problem than a watch problem - unless you were merely hunting for comments.
You're dead on, especially that annoying tone...
Spot On!
You hammered multiple nails. My 1964 makes me enjoy the aestethic of the most beautiful Omega ever made (145.005) to my semi-rough job everyday. At a 250$ price point. With a reliable pick-up quartz.
DH making hommages to vintage watches 99.8% of people have never heard of is an excellent move.
There's always an ego problem present in everyone of his videos.
I'm sure TTT was just hunting for comments and trying to sound like an expert. I mean he's a "watch guy" that doesn't know the difference between a zulu and nato strap. And when people tried to educate him in the comments, his reply was literally "who cares". We'll most people that are into watches do...
Given the style, build quality, and affordable price point, I think Dan Henry offers a fantastic value for money. Just great looking watches that serve a purpose with vintage aesthetic.
Hey, a bit low-key and negative, it’s a cool brand for 260 bucks, and a little different. 🧐🏴
I love vintage watches. I just don't want the headache of renovating old watches. I'm glad that there are vintage style new watches. BTW, imagine all the specks and tarnish on an actual vintage watch dial.
JORY: isn’t impressed by Dan Henry
*Hugo Mountbatten* 🦖(from The Urban Gentry): for reasons best left unexplained... Jory Godman ... is unable to make it, so I Will be taking over... the Chanel
(Jory tied up in an abandoned warehouse)
(The video Intro I was referring to with Hugo Mountbatten)
ua-cam.com/video/qkwS3Q-gu1Q/v-deo.html
Epic comment 😂💪🏻 go Hugo!
I own 4 Dan Henry's, and I love them.
Sorry it's now you standard.
Cool 😎
Never had the pleasure of reviewing a Dan Henry. I think the thing with a lot of people on vintage watches is that a lot of people want a modernised version. Very much like when people take classic cars and then pack them with modern engines and drives.
I have a very good friend who owns an auto restoration shop and I spend many hours there every week. The current trend for the last few years has been classic Camaros, Chevelles, and tri-5 Chevys with LS engine conversions and modern suspensions. They have the classic lines outside but the bulletproof internal workings to make the best of both worlds.
I have several DH's and enjoy them all. We have to remember what we have paid for them so they ain't going to be perfect. They're a niche watch but, on balance, represent good overall value. The 1962 Panda really looks the part to my eyes. A very thorough and honest review as always with the usual high level of entertainment.
Vintage watches need more care and cost more. The Dan Henry's give you the vintage look w/o the vintage costs. I hope he makes one I like soon because I like his aesthetic and would like to get one. Be great for a beater.
When it came out a few years ago, I bought the slate grey version with the date complication and I still appreciate this watch. Simple, with a very nice beads of rice bracelet and with a reliable movement. Pretty good package for the price in my opinion.
Despite this review and another (less snobby) I've viewed on Urban Gentry regarding this make/model, I have ordered a Dan Henry 1964 with a white face and 3 black sub dials. I will enjoy it.
The name, Tri-Compax, refers to the three complications: the moon-phase, chronograph, and complete calendar (it's often mistakenly assumed that “tri-compax” refers to a chronograph sub-dial configuration).
Reviewing a Dan Henry 1964 without talking about the beautiful Aston Martin DB5 on the caseback, or without mentioning the story behind the time capsule...
Bit disappointed here. Did you do your homework well?
👍🏻 Thank you 🙏🏻
The 1970 Orange is their coolest watch and at $290 for a auto.
I hear you. Here's my take. I love chronographs, in particular vintage manual wind ones. Love the sub 40mm sizes, the look, the proportions, the simplicity. Have owned multiple examples with valjoux, landeron, lemania and seiko movements. But, it's a minefield. I had 3 break within a month of each other (even though they were well looked after), and each would cost me more to fix than I paid for it. That's where to me DH makes sense. I got the 1962 black dial, the universal geneve 'evil Nina'. To get the watch it was based on would cost me min $10k. Way more than I am prepared to spend on any watch - have other priorities. And I would still have the same anxiety about it breaking so probably would end up not wearing it at all. So I now have a watch that has a very similar look but is not a clone, with a reliable movement, made by a guy who is a world renowned watch collector and really appreciates good design. I don't care about looking at my watches through a microscope. My own example is absolutely good enough. I don't regret my purchase at all but I get why it's not for everyone.
I have a 1962 Panda. I agree it's not a spec monster. But it's a fun and stylish piece. And at the price they come in at there is bound to be some compromises.
You are paying for the look, but DH gets that part right.
I have the 1937 in gold. Great looking watch.
So do I, absolute love it!
I have that one too. I sometimes wear mine on a blue NATO. I think it's better built than this one.
I got two, the 63 and the 64. 64 pretty much turned into my daily driver. No complaints.
I’ve owned a DH 1962 panda for a few months now and while I don’t wear it everyday, I really like how the white dial and black subdials pop through the domed crystal, especially out in the sunlight. And it works great on the black/brown leather straps or NATO I got for it too. So I can wear it casually or even with a suit.
Perhaps ‘twas because I got the white dial but I didn’t notice any imperfections with my naked eye and have been quite pleased by the vintage styling. And given how rare and expensive the Universal Geneve Compax it’s based on is, I was very happy to pay $270 for such an iconic looking piece.
I bought this one and i could not be happier. Love the feel ans look of it. Definitely something different in my collection.
I own 2 DH’s, actually wearing the 1962 right now, and am very happy with them. I see the plastic cylinder case as a time capsule.
I love the vintage styling, but sure as heck don't want the performance of something made from a few decadesbefore I was born. Classic Ferraris have some of the sexiest designs, but put it on the track today and it'll most liklely get smoked by a Civic. So I appreciate those that tries to bring back only the nice part of the past that I appreciate. I think a DH will have to be in my collection some day.
If the crystal wasn’t so “domed” or “bulky”, I’d probably bought a DH time ago. Very nice watch in my eyes (and wallet...)👌🏻
The watch looks nice but I’m not sure about the price of it honestly seems a bit expensive for the specs
Yeah, if they put milled clasp and sapphire crystal then they can charge this.
You’re paying for design. And that’s worth quite a bit in my book.
It's a budget watch, sir. I thinking to order one.
Yeah cos vintage daytonas are so easy to pick up
I wasn't aware that you hadn't reviewed a DH before. I have this watch, though with silver dial & 3 black sub-dials. I find it to be a pretty nice watch. I do think there's something to be said for getting a DH or any vintage-style watch vs. actual vintage watch. The latter can be highly expensive and worrying to wear...the former looks the part and involves less worry. Thanks for this review, T3.
I love vintage look watches, but don't want the hassle of a vintage watch. I think a Seiko movement gives some credibility, TGV says good things about them in his channel, but Jory made some good points about quality. Undecided more than ever.
@Bad Matt I think your watch looks amazing. I can understand why you love it. I think the retail price is very good. I wished Jory would have said a bit about Dan Henry, who he is and his connection to vintage watches. I think this story gives the watch more appeal. Congrats.
I appreciate your honest review. I appreciate your advice to the manufacturer.
I like that the chronograph second sweep the Tach ring.
Same actually. I own a Dan Henry panda, was super jazzed about it, and now it’s the one in my collection that I never wear. Just not a huge fan of it.
😢🐼🐼🐼😭
@@larsstougaard7097 wanna buy it?
@@kylenicholas6362 I have a Certina watch I'm going to look at tomorrow, will get back to you if I'm game. There is a few Dan Henry I really like, so will get one sometime in the future for sure.
@@kylenicholas6362 Message me privately about pricing and we could come to an agreement if you are actually willing to part with the watch.
A bit more affordable than a vintage early 60’s tri-compax chronograph????
I think you need to choose your comparisons a bit more carefully mate
I love this watch. Very nice looking.
I think DH , had a fantastic ethic , he has taken great ideas from the fabulous back catalogue of the golden age of watchmaking - reworked restyled then and gave everyone who aspires to wear a timeless piece of art / engineering/ culture that chance
A fair point to consider, I think, is the accessibility of vintage watches. For example, I have the Dan Henry pilot chrono (1964?). There is nothing I would rather have more than a vintage bretiling co pilot that it is partially inspired by. However, not only are those watches scarce, they are very expensive.
Also as a side note, the crystal cracked on mine and DH replaced it with a new sapphire one for free. Fantastic customer service. I think it is an important consideration when dealing with micro brands, as some can be overseas and be difficult to deal with.
Not everyone has 10,000 dollars to spend on a vintage watch. And those watches are very delicate that you cannot even wear them. So DH offers tremendous value for collectors.
I got the bi-compax in the panda with date. I love it. It grew on me and I play with it a lot. It's not perfect, but it suits me.
regarding the 24 hour sub dial, I have a couple of watches with this complication. I really don't mind it but, the only function I have gotten from it is when you set the date, it's easy to know if the watch is currently showing AM or PM time.
would appreciate a DH 1970 review being as though it has an automatic Seiko Caliber NH35 movement.
would be pretty cool to see a comparison of microbrand watches that use the Seiko Caliber NH35 movement
My experience with DH was disappointing and surprising.
I purchased the 1963 Pilot Chronograph ($280 USD) . Within six months the bezel came off, then the ($45 USD) leather band began to separate at the point where it clasps, both problems I fixed with a tube of Dollar Store Super Glue.
I contacted DH as my watch was under warranty, and I was told that the warranty doesn't cover the band. Fair enough. But this comment from CS confused me... "and I see you wet your strap and its leather" as the band in the picture was not wet, and the comment is accusing me of tampering with a product for the sake of a return.
I want nothing from DH - not a refund, not a return, nothing at all - beyond them standing behind their brand, their product and their workmanship. DH should stand for something. Maybe one day I’ll wear the Chrono again.
Thank you for the opportunity to share my experience.
A 24-hr sub-dial is useful for date setting IMO.
I would really like to see a "Time teller" take on Lorier.
I’ve got my eye on a Falcon 2.
@@chriscon8463 what do you think about the geminis?
Tbh the only take you need is your own personal feelings towards the watch. I love Lorier, it really doesn't matter what any reviewer says.
New to your channel
I just purchased my first watch a 1964 As your reviewing. I’m impressed with both your review and the watch.
spec monster is a funny flex. The function of a watch is to tell time. My all measures, this meca-quartz watch tells time with accuracy an order of magnitude greater than those other's mentioned. So which has better specs? I'd say the watch that tells time most accurately by a factor of 10. JMTC
It’s Gran Turismo I think 😊 Had the panda-version. Never struck me as poor finish. The thickness was more on the negative. And the feeling of the buttons isn’t top notch. Other than that ir’s one of the few chronographs with under 45mm lug to lug, not expensive, nice bracelet and a nice strap. Good review, but I don’t think most people will ever see the small imperfections with the watch on wrist 😊
Underrated watch brand ! Just got the blue 1970s version and I love it. It looks 10x the price.
This is the one I keep coming back to, ever since it came out, tri compax no date reverse panda is the pick of the bunch for me
I'd rather wear the Dan Henry 1937 over a 1933 Brightling Chrono, or 1939 Omega Tachy-Telemeter
Vintage spec watch with in house movement. Vostok still using the same design from the 1950-60s.
Perfect timing! Bought my first Dan Henry 2 days ago, it will arrive this Wednesday. Looking at eBay they hold their value so I’ll only lose about £30-£50 when or if I come to sell it. I eyed the 1964 for about 2 years and always held off pulling the trigger for snobbish reasons, fundamentally I like the design so I thought I’d give in and give it a try.
Nice inexpensive watch with low grade imperfections.
I have this exact watch in my collection. It's not perfect, but still a cool watch that looks much more expensive than 260$. Interesting piece for a collection with little story and good chronograph.
However, I somehow scratched it in first 2 months so it has a big scratch on the crystal and it's harder to love and wear this watch as much as other my mechanical watches which are little more expensive. So you should know it before buying.
I must admit to be somewhat biased in favor of DH’s watches and found your tone at the beginning of the video grating. However, as you went along I saw the things you pointed out and it also seemed that your tone changed. I think it’s a fair review. I think it’s likely a good buy if one knows what it is. I can certainly appreciate DH’s effort to promote the beauty of vintage watches in a reliable and affordable package.
Did Dan Henry poison your cat ? Crazy nitpicking review on a $280 watch.
Jordy, for the measly sum DH is asking for this Meca Quartz is vey little to criticize. What watch is NOT a homage of an earlier timepiece?
I turned on the second hand by pressing the top right crown. Why does the second hand stop sweeping after a few hours? Can I get it to sweep continually? Thanks.
The second hand on a chronograph is only supposed to be moving if you're actually measuring passing time or speed. If the hand were always moving, then you'd have to wait until it reaches the 12 o'clock position to actually measure the passing time.
Besides price… what are the main differences between hamilton chonros and dan henry chronos
Again I ask, why have you failed to mention the LUG WIDTH?
19mm
What about Nezumi????
I have this watch with the silver sunburst, it offers pretty average value for money - definitely nothing to shout about. Sapphire for me would've been great. I swapped out the beads of rice and I thought it felt cheap and went for a nice mesh to keep it vintage. It is one to buy purely for the looks which it pulls off convincingly and I love the silver sunburst/black dial combo...and nice to have a grab 'n go in a box full of mostly automatics. I looked under macro at mine and hand finishing is clean and polished, no burrs and no specs on the dial that I can see but I bought mine recently so maybe it has been improved...however indexes similar to your review sample, could do with a clean and polish.
The best affordable vintage look: seagul 1963. The best affordable, period: seiko 5 (old generation). Dan Henry can't compete with any of those
Question: What do you get for your money ? A great deal. I can't relate to the nitpicking here.
Shocked at the pressed clasp and dirt on the face. Thought they were a bit higher end.
We are a strange group.Many criticize Ali Express brands because they are 'copies' but what makes them any different then these Dan Henrys or Steinharts other then not being made in Germany or USA? Just marketing and China discrimination in my opinion.....
I think it’s reasonable for $260. I have been interested in owning a mecaquartz.
I won't buy a $3,000 watch OR these $30 Chinese watches for $260; neither is reasonable to me. I'd feel much more ripped off buying this one in particular.
@@briansc5148 Agree. This is NOT worth 260$
Which quartz alternative would you recommend?
Totally agree, I bought the 1972 and although it's fine I won't buy another DH
Me to my 10 year old self: In the future we have watches that tell time, track movement, send messages, monitor your vitals, play games, and nearly anything else you can imagine. Oh, and we hate these watches and refuse to wear them, preferring instead the heritage of that $10 Casio you're wearing.
10 year old self: :|
I’m picking up mine Monday just because it’s a nice watch
You say your not a fan of his watches and if you want vintage then you will buy a vintage. Not sure how much youve read or looked into DH. He made these because you cant really find good vintage watches. If you do then they probably need service, they may be beat up, no water resistance. He made vintage looking modern watches that people can afford. Not everyone can find a vintage watch they can afford and have to baby it. People always complain about the 24hr subdial. Thats how seiko makes the movement. There is no quartz modern seiko with an hr subdial. You have limited options with quartz. People act like he makes movements also. I guess seiko saflex was also garbage
Well, take a look at the review. It doesn’t matter what DH said- it matters what DH produces... and in this case, it’s sloppy garbage. 🤣
How about the case back?
Looking at this really nice design motivates me to get my circa 1970 LeJour reverse panda bi-register chronometer repaired and serviced asap. That will probably cost twice as much as this Dan Henry.
Not a chronograph but a Vostok Amphibia is less than half the price and with an actual in-house fully mechanical movement and original design, while still retro looking.
*This comment is about the DH 1972, NOT the watch being reviewed in this video.
My opinion: DON'T BUY the Dan Henry 1972!
I own it, and I've seen watch reviewers like tgv and Jody recommend this piece after playing with it. Here's the rub.
There's two glaring issues that are common to every watch with the 1972, and one seemingly common minor one.
The minor one first seems to be a common problem I've seen on forums where the plastic collar on one of the subdials comes loose and makes the hand useless. I had to send mine back to Dan's official repair shop to get it fixed.
The second is that the alarm is practically useless. Mine is off by 9 minutes, and when I contacted Dan about this he said that was within spec and I was out of luck. The thing is, it's CONSISTENTLY 9 minutes ahead, which means they simply don't take the time to get the alarm hand right. They just get it close enough and move on, and refuse to fix it.
The last is that the blue chronograph second hand doesn't even come close to lining up with the indices because it has about a quarter second of play. If you change the watch orientation you can see it move back and forth. Again, I contacted Dan about this. He wrote, "for the blue hand It's not an alignment problem, the hand has a little play because of the gear size and there is nothing we can do about it, all these movements are the same..." He later says that Miyota admits the problem but won't make it public...
So although the case, bracelet, and finishing are very nice on this watch, Dan Henry is stuck with a quality control problem from the Miyota factory, and won't honor requests for returns of this manufacturer's defect.
None of the watch reviewers have caught this. Jory, if you see this, I can provide you with the email chain from Dan for proof, and the watch to review. I don't want anyone else stuck in this position.
Was just about to purchase the black 1972 thank you !!!
was looking for a vintage style chrono, went with a Merkur (Pierre Paulin) black panda, at least it has a genuine mechanical movement... ;-)
I did the exact same thing. For the same reasons.
Same thing I did, but with the Sugess watch instead, solely because it was 40mm. I love the panda bicompax and the exhibition caseback, and will likely get one of the Merkur FODs in blue as well... although, I have been eyeing that Zodiac GrandRally, and it’s hard to decide!
I really like them and have 3. They do feel a little 'light' and can't really describe it but they just don't have the heft of premium watches. Let me be straight up they are really, really good watches with my favorite being the 1972. One thing that kind of bothers me is the 'limited number' is BS, they just re-released the 1963 that sold out. That is the only thing not cool about them
I have this same watch but with the date. I like it. It would be nice if it was a full sapphire crystal. I don't mind the thickness of the watch.
I can't stand the indices paint execution.
I ordered a DH watch with the steel bracelet, but came with the leather band attached and bracelet was separate. I complained to them about how hard it was to swap the bands and they admitted you need special tools and skills to do this. I wanted to return it, and they refused. Many email exchanges with them resulted in totally ruining my experience with them. They literally said it wasn't their fault I didn't know how to swap the bands. Basically a big FU from them.
I will never order another
Haha I feel you. I had to take it to shop to swap straps
So for the money what else would you recommend?
It's it just me? Why does the seconds register have just 4 tick marks instead of 60? This isn't a Movado where you are supposed to guess the time.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. I am under the impression that there is no sapphire since it is hard to make these highly doomed crystals in sapphire, which leaves mineral or acrylic. Think acrylic would've been a better choice. As Jory noted, the domed crystal is the reason to buy this along with vintage diameter. I have this in silver, no dirt. Noticed number was low, maybe QC improved. I imagine a vintage Omega Seamaster Chrono that this is a near copy of would be expensive and hard to find. Just looked one up on C24 for $3700, and not great condition. Even the pie pan depression around rim of dial and matched bent second Chrono hand is copied from the Omega.
I'm loyal follower of the channel. Finally bought me a New Oris Big Crown Pro Pilot. LOVED it. Until it popped while winding it!!😫 so sent it back to online seller. Very professional customer service so far. Been waiting for turnaround for about 1 month. I'll keep ya informed. 🤷♂️ now I'm gonna be scared to touch it. Any advice?
I prefer the Geckota C-01. Same movement. No quality control issues. Similar money.
Always wanted a 1972 porsche design orfina but they’re just too expensive. Bought a dan henry 1972 & for the price,its a very nice & solid watch. Import taxes are currently a little extortionate to the uk,so i hope DH finds a supplier over here soon.
I had the silver dial 1939 but sold it. I liked it way more in photos than on the wrist.
Yup, I sold mine after a month. Didn’t really like how it looked on wrist and it felt kinda cheap too. Guess I’m just used to more substantial modern watches
@@_AlphaLimaGolf I hung on to mine longer hoping it would grow on me. I really liked the dial, but it wore wide and tall. I think the lack of bezel and pronounced dome on the crystal combined to make it feel off. Just never got much wrist time. I did ok selling it though, so that’s a good point for the brand.
I'm not surprise! As an ex-owner of the 1964, my copy has the same issues - specks & dirts on the dial, uneven lume application and that's why i sold it. However, the 1962 & 1972 that I bought previously do not have these issues, in fact, under the loupe, they are spotless. Not sure the QC issue only occurs on 1964 models tho, but I highly suggest T3 to review other models offered by DH, especially the new 1937, Furlan Marri made a homage out of it! Hah!
I do suspect the “1964”, is because it’s a kind of homage to the Heuer Carrera. Though that was was launched in 1963, I’ll guess it uses the 64, to prevent confusion with the Seagull one, or maybe because of copyright issues.