Longer because they’ve telescoped the main and Q & A vids into one. Wonder why? Still v. enjoyable though, and enables Richard to get so many, many more plugs in for (Richard Osman’s) House of Games, which is probably great. Though TBH, I’ve never watched it. 😮
I listen to this on Spotify most days and it’s only because of what Richard said at the start that I even thought to check it out on UA-cam. It’s like you’ve unlocked a new dimension for me.
I usually listen to podcasts one once or twice before I get bored and stop listening. Not this podcast. It's always fascinating and Marina and Richard are the best kind of people.
Another great podcast. The what is a celebrity thing annoys me, every few months when celebrity reality TV casts (strictly, CBB, I'm a celebrity etc) I get so frustrated with people saying "none of them are celebrities" when what they mean is "I'm getting old and out of touch and only know retired 90's footballers and A list 1970's actors"
Love the podcast. I'm not sure people having opinions is the issue, that's always been the case. Social media hasn't changed people it's revealed them. The issue is when people mistake opinion for truth and fact. As a kid, that differentiation was clear to me. You understood what the truth meant and your opinion was more aimed at its representation rather than its validity. We're all complicit in creating hysteria. It's why I don't think we'll ever be a republic, people would miss the 'gossip'. On a different point, to say Ryan Gosling is a 'B' movie star is ridiculous if you're going to say Julia Roberts is a star. That's insane.
Extra bit about clapping. On sitcoms, it used to be common for the warm-up comic to tell jokes to help "train" the audience how to come in quickly, etc. It was very clever and often far funnier than the show! But as part of that, they would tell a couple of jokes, then persuade the audience to not laugh immediately. It gave us sound people a couple of laughs for the show with clean ins and out - life savers. I am sure they must still do that. Sometimes you would use "canned" laughter. For instance, the BBC kept a library of laughs used during recordings. They would be marked up as to which studo they were recorded in. In the old days, the BBC didn't change their audience mics, so those could be put onto another show seamlessly.
When I played an obstetrician on CTM, the real baby was ‘delivered’ by the medical specialists on hand , one passing it carefully through to the other, then I had to repeat it with the ‘jelly baby’. Finally the shots are mixed in the edit so the close up is the real baby. It’s a well oiled machine, if you’ll forgive the pun.
My sister despises Meghan, a person who she has never met, and has no effect on her life. I often just have to sit back and let her vent about something that she'd read about, and is totally irrelevent. Crazy.
I believe in a free press of course when it comes to actual news. But I agree. Journalists who write hit pieces / opinion pieces on people day in day out (no matter who they are) will never be held to account for their actions and can therefore say what they like. Its disgusting really. The closed bubble of bigoty and nepotism that passes for our media elite in the UK. And they think they are the good guys!
My favourite bit of media fuckery around the Kate story was something I found on the BBC news app. A story with a headline about William paying a visit to one of his homelessness charities, consisted of at least ten paragraphs about how it was an attempt to distract from the media storm surrounding Kate’s reclusiveness. Like the editor had a had a total irony bypass.
The audio version of this on my podcast player is only 40 mins long and doesnt jave the questions about hulk hogan, baby actors, canned laughter etc. is that typical? Is the UA-cam version always longer?
Hi Tomas, apologies for the confusion, this is a combined video, the Regular episode + Questions (& Answers). We have been trialing combining episodes as many viewers have asked for longer uploads.
Richards comment about stars doing adverts in other countries is very true. Japan were pioneers of this, as far back as the 70's. I remember a mate of mine who visited Japan in about 73 telling me he saw Bowie advertising Vespa's. This was at the height of his Ziggy/Aladdin Sane period when in this country at least he had this otherwordly persona, he also remembers Mick Jaggetr shilling for something. The stars knew at that time there wasn't a Clive James to expose these ads,what went on in Japan stayed there. As far as Bond is concerned I always found it a bit tiresome to be honest, even when I was a kid. I can watch a Connery one at a push. I mentioned this to a bloke I worked with once and he was horrified, thought I was going to have to hand in my man card. Harry Palmer was much cooler and he'd knock you up a decent omelette as well.
I was always under the impression that it was Daniel Craig in the first Bond that kick started the body building going to the gym phenomenon that we are living in now. And thank you so much for getting Aaron Taylor-Johnson name right & not calling him Arran (from an Aaron (air-run) with a big chip on his shoulder)
M*A*S*H was the canned laughter killer. It was screened in the UK with and without the laughter track and the episodes without had so much more pathos. Made a lot of folk inside and outside the industry aware of the issue.
Given your talking about Bond, I was recently watching Casino Royale. One part of that film always bugs me. While Bond is on the train speaking to Vespa, she's mentions the watch Bond is wearing and asks 'Rolex?' Bond reply's 'Omega'. I'm unsure which company would have paid for that product placement, Rolex or Omega. Who do you think paid for this, and would they have had to get permission from the other party?
The product placement in Bond really bugs me and it’s obvious when they do it. At one point he asks for a beer by name and one of the movies morphs into a Ford advert about half way through.
I’ve always been bothered by Americans criticising British shows for having canned laughter when almost always its a live audience. I think American shows use old laugh recordings more regularly, so American audiences assume that it’s the same in UK shows, so complain about it - when in reality without a studio audience the British sitcom they’re watching would be flatter and less funny because the actors are getting no energy to bounce off of
Regarding the 007 discussion, one thing is for sure: neither of these two have the looks to be considered for a role in a Bond movie. Also, the assumption that Craig needed to start most days with "leg work" or some other gym work to keep himself looking fit, is wrong. Daniel Craig is simply lucky that way, lean and muscular, it's in his genes. He always looked very good before becoming Bond, for example in movies like Layer Cake or Tomb Raider.
Great question, we’ve slightly touched on this topic before, but scripts are ever-changing, in fact, even in the editing stage it’s possible for things to be completely rearranged and even entire new scenes written and added in
MI6 operative doing missions where names and places are named CAN'T REALLY STAY LIGHT HEARTED. Bond got dark because states were doing unthinkable things and that eventually came to light post-cold war.
I've been bingeing on Podcasts to try and block out the election until I can watch the results and get blind drunk. But my main conclusion so far is that Marina Hyde and Rory Stewart should be running the country.
@@TheRestIsEntertainment hiya, apologies for any offence. I would like to thank you for your excellent podcast. I look forward to it every week. I was just getting annoyed by the amount of coverage this story is getting. I literally turned over to another podcast that was speaking about the same thing.
I get what you are saying, I almost didn't watch this one for the same reason. But I think you should give it a chance. Richard and Marina do an excellent and insightful analysis of the topic.
@@simoncarswell3515 I have watched it to the end and there is a lot of good stuff here. I was just disappointed as we only get an hour or so a week and a big chunk of this weeks I wasn’t interested in.
Regarding the new born babies having to be available to the production company's schedule... has there ever been anyone concidering being induced so their baby can be used? Honestly, I doubt it, but it popped into my mind - based mostly on "crazy US pagent parent" wildness.
I was just about to write that I am also in favor of only having five opinions a year, but I don't know if I want to spend an opinion on that. Is it sponge-worthy or not, thatis the question.
I appreciate how both of them are not afraid to hold their 'colleagues' to account for the part they play in contributing to the cesspit that is modern invasive journalism, all without sounding holier than thou.
having spent their opionion allowence on January 3. is quite optimistic. i doubt some people even make it to 3. a.m and are broke for the rest of the year
45:30 Am I to assume all Hollywood stars have heard of the laxative/bronchial problems? Is this why so many of them insist on doing REAL cocaine?…sometimes regardless of the subject of the movie 😂 I mean that’s gotta be considered super-safe, logically 🤔
Re: canned laughter. It must be a different protocol on (specifically) Radio 4 comedy panel shows. Eg. "The Unbelievable Truth" doesn't record live laughter. All guffaws and applause heard on "The Unbelievable Truth" is stock laughter harvested from the 1956-60 Radio recordings of "Hancock's Half Hour". (I know this to be true because the sainted Jeremy Hardy said so.)
Thank god on this one you're not judging "stars" or "celebs" by their income or how much money they generate. Yes it's subjective but the "star" quality is not always matched by income.
Why dont other "zoom" interviews or podcasts sound like this when participants are apart. It sounds and feels like youre in the same room. The others sound like being stuck in a coke can.
@@thomasdalton1508 What I wonder is if both audios are recorded separately and then combined together in sync, Is what I mean. As if this was "live" would it sound the same?
I'd like to refer back to a previous podcast. I was largely unaware of the Kate conspiracy mill. I'm not sure who's buying the Daily Mail, or any newspaper for the news. But outside of social media, I don't believe it registered. Certainly not with me...
celebrity today is such a broad term, any "celebrity" show always has people in comments on socials saying "these celebrities, i only know 2" but each person is naming a different 2. the world of media is so broad that while i may enjoy one person others may not even be in the sphere of that area of the media. people are no longer all watching the same 4 channels. its now hundreds of thousands of channels across several thousand platforms. i could name 100 people that i and millions of others would stop in the streets for a selfie that others have never even heard of. the job of celeb shows these days is to get enough of a wide net that they capture the majority of an audience. also it seems social media stars or those who have gained a social media following do a heck of allot better on these shows if theres a public vote. mr beast could dominate any of these shows. but so many viewers would still not know who he is
Most of the Warbutons etc. ads by ‘BIG Hollywoood’ seemed to me, at least, to take place at the height of COVID, when these people were light on work and down to their last $60-70 million, or so. Never makes me want to buy the product though… quite the reverse! 😜
I wish the people who were always the first to clap after a piece of classical music would be escorted out of the room. Let the music sink in. It’s the same with streaming services that give you three seconds before they start playing the next episode.
Trump won't get anything close to $3bn if he dumps his shares. The share price doesn't wait until you've finished selling before it tanks. Even ignoring the effect of the founder showing a lack of confidence in the business, there isn't enough liquidity to sell half the business at that share price. There would need to be $3bn worth of investors wanting to buy the shares at that price - who would those be?
@@daviebananas1735 As they said in the podcast, the board can authorise him to sell shares before that and the board is hand picked by him, so that really isn't a factor.
I don’t think Richard really heard what she was saying, I agree with her regarding her educated point of view. Charles‘s mother wouldn’t give up the throne to him because? Why didn’t she? He was youthful too at one point he doesn’t look well, he did not age well.
Who do you think should be the next James Bond?
Alexander Armstrong, obviously.
Alan Carr in "Alan Carr's James Bond"
Barry Keoghan
Paul Mescal
Or Regé-Jean Page
so glad these get longer and longer every week. New fav podcast. could listen to you both for hours
Longer because they’ve telescoped the main and Q & A vids into one. Wonder why?
Still v. enjoyable though, and enables Richard to get so many, many more plugs in for (Richard Osman’s) House of Games, which is probably great. Though TBH, I’ve never watched it. 😮
This is the absolute best podcast out there 😊
Dont normally comment but the edit at 49:04 is 10/10.
Well done editor!
Late clap
the late clap cancels out the compliment I'm afraid... haha
These are the most authentic and informative of humans.
I'm really impressed with the edit! It makes the filmed version of the (already great) podcast all the more worthwhile
Best podcast on UA-cam, more behind the scenes what happens in Films and TV Shows please
I listen to this on Spotify most days and it’s only because of what Richard said at the start that I even thought to check it out on UA-cam. It’s like you’ve unlocked a new dimension for me.
Same haha
Perfectly put
I usually listen to podcasts one once or twice before I get bored and stop listening. Not this podcast. It's always fascinating and Marina and Richard are the best kind of people.
I always look forward to listening to Richard and Marina . Great podcast.
I didn't know i needed this podcast, but it's now answering all the questions i ever had
I could listen to this all day. Fascinating!
Well, as others have said, this is just one of the best podcasts ever.
Just loving the new 1 hour episodes 🤗🤗🤗
This is hands down the most entertaining and engaging podcast out. Marina and Richard are fast becoming National Treasures!
Another great podcast. The what is a celebrity thing annoys me, every few months when celebrity reality TV casts (strictly, CBB, I'm a celebrity etc) I get so frustrated with people saying "none of them are celebrities" when what they mean is "I'm getting old and out of touch and only know retired 90's footballers and A list 1970's actors"
35:12 I definitely heard "The Saucing of newborn babies" lol
This show is the definition of 'sheer delight'; I can't think of anything better on the interweb.
You've become a much adored fixture of my week. You and Dish are absolute highlights!
We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning (Jean Baudrillard, 1981).
Animatronic babies too apparentky
Love the podcast. I'm not sure people having opinions is the issue, that's always been the case. Social media hasn't changed people it's revealed them. The issue is when people mistake opinion for truth and fact. As a kid, that differentiation was clear to me. You understood what the truth meant and your opinion was more aimed at its representation rather than its validity. We're all complicit in creating hysteria. It's why I don't think we'll ever be a republic, people would miss the 'gossip'.
On a different point, to say Ryan Gosling is a 'B' movie star is ridiculous if you're going to say Julia Roberts is a star. That's insane.
Watching this pod has made me realise Richard is definitely a national treasure
Extra bit about clapping. On sitcoms, it used to be common for the warm-up comic to tell jokes to help "train" the audience how to come in quickly, etc. It was very clever and often far funnier than the show! But as part of that, they would tell a couple of jokes, then persuade the audience to not laugh immediately. It gave us sound people a couple of laughs for the show with clean ins and out - life savers. I am sure they must still do that.
Sometimes you would use "canned" laughter. For instance, the BBC kept a library of laughs used during recordings. They would be marked up as to which studo they were recorded in. In the old days, the BBC didn't change their audience mics, so those could be put onto another show seamlessly.
That’s fascinating, thank you
No idea why, but I specially enjoyed this one.
Thanks very much!
When I played an obstetrician on CTM, the real baby was ‘delivered’ by the medical specialists on hand , one passing it carefully through to the other, then I had to repeat it with the ‘jelly baby’. Finally the shots are mixed in the edit so the close up is the real baby. It’s a well oiled machine, if you’ll forgive the pun.
These are always terrific. Thanks.
So is that Richard decisively ruling himself out of the running as the next James Bond?
Never say never (again)...
He'd be a good Q also
I wonder how long it will take channel 5 to do a documentary on the whole Kate Middleton conspiracy craze!
out tonight I heard
Instant Rebuttal Unit, my favourite Frank Zappa album.
House of Games sounds like instead of having a studio audience, it is just the people who are on set who are applauding.
Great show once again
My sister despises Meghan, a person who she has never met, and has no effect on her life. I often just have to sit back and let her vent about something that she'd read about, and is totally irrelevent. Crazy.
I believe in a free press of course when it comes to actual news. But I agree. Journalists who write hit pieces / opinion pieces on people day in day out (no matter who they are) will never be held to account for their actions and can therefore say what they like. Its disgusting really. The closed bubble of bigoty and nepotism that passes for our media elite in the UK. And they think they are the good guys!
My favourite bit of media fuckery around the Kate story was something I found on the BBC news app. A story with a headline about William paying a visit to one of his homelessness charities, consisted of at least ten paragraphs about how it was an attempt to distract from the media storm surrounding Kate’s reclusiveness. Like the editor had a had a total irony bypass.
I usually know 2/4 people on House of Games too! 😂
When they mentioned actors rehearsing with jelly babies am I the only one who pictured them holding a tiny gummy sweet?
The audio version of this on my podcast player is only 40 mins long and doesnt jave the questions about hulk hogan, baby actors, canned laughter etc. is that typical? Is the UA-cam version always longer?
Hi Tomas, apologies for the confusion, this is a combined video, the Regular episode + Questions (& Answers). We have been trialing combining episodes as many viewers have asked for longer uploads.
What a lovely team! Luv’n the Marina and Richard combo! xx
why is the audio podcast 1/2 the duration of the version on youtube?
UA-cam is combined but the podcasts are split into two parts (normal episode + questions and answers). The second (questions) bit is out now.
Richards comment about stars doing adverts in other countries is very true. Japan were pioneers of this, as far back as the 70's. I remember a mate of mine who visited Japan in about 73 telling me he saw Bowie advertising Vespa's. This was at the height of his Ziggy/Aladdin Sane period when in this country at least he had this otherwordly persona, he also remembers Mick Jaggetr shilling for something. The stars knew at that time there wasn't a Clive James to expose these ads,what went on in Japan stayed there. As far as Bond is concerned I always found it a bit tiresome to be honest, even when I was a kid. I can watch a Connery one at a push. I mentioned this to a bloke I worked with once and he was horrified, thought I was going to have to hand in my man card. Harry Palmer was much cooler and he'd knock you up a decent omelette as well.
Charles Bronson's Mandom perfume commercials are amazing.
And the song! *Lovers Of The World* with Jerry Wallace
1976
As my dear departed dad used to say - "Opinions are like arses - everyone has one, but nobody really wants to hear anyone else's."
I was always under the impression that it was Daniel Craig in the first Bond that kick started the body building going to the gym phenomenon that we are living in now.
And thank you so much for getting Aaron Taylor-Johnson name right & not calling him Arran (from an Aaron (air-run) with a big chip on his shoulder)
Could 100% see Richard playing Q
M*A*S*H was the canned laughter killer. It was screened in the UK with and without the laughter track and the episodes without had so much more pathos. Made a lot of folk inside and outside the industry aware of the issue.
After seeing it without it's pretty much entirely unwatchable with the laugh track.
@@anonymes2884 Precisely!
36:41 thought you were going to say Liz truss as prime minister
I remember reading that years ago someone was interviewing Meryl Streep and called her a star. She said "Oh no, Morgan Fairchild is a star."
Given your talking about Bond, I was recently watching Casino Royale. One part of that film always bugs me. While Bond is on the train speaking to Vespa, she's mentions the watch Bond is wearing and asks 'Rolex?' Bond reply's 'Omega'. I'm unsure which company would have paid for that product placement, Rolex or Omega. Who do you think paid for this, and would they have had to get permission from the other party?
Omega and I think they are mentioned in the credits. They basically want to say “look we are better than a Rolex”.
The product placement in Bond really bugs me and it’s obvious when they do it. At one point he asks for a beer by name and one of the movies morphs into a Ford advert about half way through.
The movie Ronin had an Audi ad crowbarred in halfway shamelessly, that was probably worse than Bond - which is pretty bad
I clicked on this thinking "prop cocaine" was a new, designer drug. 🤣
I’ve always been bothered by Americans criticising British shows for having canned laughter when almost always its a live audience. I think American shows use old laugh recordings more regularly, so American audiences assume that it’s the same in UK shows, so complain about it - when in reality without a studio audience the British sitcom they’re watching would be flatter and less funny because the actors are getting no energy to bounce off of
Went to Burbank to see Friends being recorded (s6, e6) and we were told our laughs would be the ones used on the show.
I read that as "Poop Cocaine"...turns out that's a pretty accurate name for it
😂😂
Safer neckin' the real 'shit' 🤪
Richard's 'five opinions' idea reminds me of the play 'Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons' and its spoken word count!
Regarding the 007 discussion, one thing is for sure: neither of these two have the looks to be considered for a role in a Bond movie. Also, the assumption that Craig needed to start most days with "leg work" or some other gym work to keep himself looking fit, is wrong. Daniel Craig is simply lucky that way, lean and muscular, it's in his genes. He always looked very good before becoming Bond, for example in movies like Layer Cake or Tomb Raider.
If it's any consolation Richard, Susan Boyle's answers had to be translated into English when she was doing a Singing contest show in Japan.
I have a question: how do you send a question to the podcast The rest Is Entertainment and what are the chances of my question being selected?
I can only answer the first question I'm afraid 😂, therestisentertainment@gmail.com
Re "Laugh Tracks" I hated the canned laughter on cartoons like Scooby Doo, Dastardly & Muttley and The Flintstones in the 70s.
Has House of Games relocated to Manchester from Glasgow for Season 8
I wondered with tv shows are the scripts set in stone or do they do rewrites upto the last minute or allow a certain amount of improvisations
Great question, we’ve slightly touched on this topic before, but scripts are ever-changing, in fact, even in the editing stage it’s possible for things to be completely rearranged and even entire new scenes written and added in
Fleabag was having parts rewritten right up to minutes before recording.
good forum for Richard to plug his latest show...... what was its name??? haha
Every time marina looks down I feel like her headphones will fall off and it's messing with my ocd........until 6:00 phew
MI6 operative doing missions where names and places are named CAN'T REALLY STAY LIGHT HEARTED. Bond got dark because states were doing unthinkable things and that eventually came to light post-cold war.
I've been bingeing on Podcasts to try and block out the election until I can watch the results and get blind drunk. But my main conclusion so far is that Marina Hyde and Rory Stewart should be running the country.
Did Captain Tom not skip “celebrity” and shoot to “National Treasure” status?
16:27 *chef's kiss*
Grrr waited expectantly all week for this amazing podcast only for another boring “deep dive” into the Princess of Wales.
Please 🙏 more entertainment
Timestamps are in the description, you’re bound to find an interesting topic in there!👍
@@TheRestIsEntertainment hiya, apologies for any offence. I would like to thank you for your excellent podcast. I look forward to it every week.
I was just getting annoyed by the amount of coverage this story is getting. I literally turned over to another podcast that was speaking about the same thing.
I get what you are saying, I almost didn't watch this one for the same reason. But I think you should give it a chance. Richard and Marina do an excellent and insightful analysis of the topic.
@@simoncarswell3515 I have watched it to the end and there is a lot of good stuff here. I was just disappointed as we only get an hour or so a week and a big chunk of this weeks I wasn’t interested in.
Regarding the new born babies having to be available to the production company's schedule... has there ever been anyone concidering being induced so their baby can be used? Honestly, I doubt it, but it popped into my mind - based mostly on "crazy US pagent parent" wildness.
I was just about to write that I am also in favor of only having five opinions a year, but I don't know if I want to spend an opinion on that.
Is it sponge-worthy or not, thatis the question.
Hope everything;s OK with Marina - just noticed absence of wedding ring... Anyway, another cracking episode, both.
Top tier podcast
I appreciate how both of them are not afraid to hold their 'colleagues' to account for the part they play in contributing to the cesspit that is modern invasive journalism, all without sounding holier than thou.
Katie with no surname is obviously the Princess of Wales
having spent their opionion allowence on January 3. is quite optimistic. i doubt some people even make it to 3. a.m and are broke for the rest of the year
Richard Madden, would be my pick for the next James Bond.
Surely Tom Hanks is classed a a Superstar ?
45:30 Am I to assume all Hollywood stars have heard of the laxative/bronchial problems? Is this why so many of them insist on doing REAL cocaine?…sometimes regardless of the subject of the movie 😂 I mean that’s gotta be considered super-safe, logically 🤔
Of course, the big question should be "When is Marina going to appear on ROHOG?"
Would the next Bond baddie be a tech billionaire?
Would like to point out, as a person who avoids royal stories of all types like the plague. Thanks for the timestamps so I could just skip it.
Diana Rigg used to chomp on raw garlic before kissing scenes with Bond, such was her hatred of Lazenby.
Amazing fact haha
I do the same with the wife, she can't get enough garlic😊
@billybob-bm4mn it wouldn't put me of either.
Says the quagmire! Haha
Talking about tax...how does a tax write off work as i do not understand not releasing a film that cost millions to make at least something back
Re: canned laughter.
It must be a different protocol on (specifically) Radio 4 comedy panel shows.
Eg. "The Unbelievable Truth" doesn't record live laughter. All guffaws and applause heard on "The Unbelievable Truth" is stock laughter harvested from the 1956-60 Radio recordings of "Hancock's Half Hour".
(I know this to be true because the sainted Jeremy Hardy said so.)
He was joking. You can hear the trains at Waverley Station Edinburgh when they record it in the tent during the festival for example
(I know). 😄
I have a rule in the car 5 moans/whinges and done, so just count them and then reminding them
Thank god on this one you're not judging "stars" or "celebs" by their income or how much money they generate. Yes it's subjective but the "star" quality is not always matched by income.
James Acaster for Bond!
Why dont other "zoom" interviews or podcasts sound like this when participants are apart. It sounds and feels like youre in the same room. The others sound like being stuck in a coke can.
- prop Coke can ?
They are both in proper studios. Being in the same studio isn't important, as long as you are in a studio.
@@thomasdalton1508 What I wonder is if both audios are recorded separately and then combined together in sync, Is what I mean. As if this was "live" would it sound the same?
@@lord123j Absolutely, they recorded them separately. Even very cheaply produced podcasts do that.
I'd like to refer back to a previous podcast. I was largely unaware of the Kate conspiracy mill. I'm not sure who's buying the Daily Mail, or any newspaper for the news. But outside of social media, I don't believe it registered. Certainly not with me...
Ideally, the UK newspapers would like to run stories quoting the odds on who will be William's future wife after Kate dies.
16:28 I may have just settled upon one of my five opinions
😂😂
To quote the legendary Tina Turner: WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER EFFING JAMES BOND!!! R! I! P! please
Opinions, a question. Are we allowed to buy unused opinions?
Pronounciation....amazing how often it is said that way
Marina, do you think Cleveland is a state? 😉
celebrity today is such a broad term, any "celebrity" show always has people in comments on socials saying "these celebrities, i only know 2" but each person is naming a different 2. the world of media is so broad that while i may enjoy one person others may not even be in the sphere of that area of the media. people are no longer all watching the same 4 channels. its now hundreds of thousands of channels across several thousand platforms. i could name 100 people that i and millions of others would stop in the streets for a selfie that others have never even heard of. the job of celeb shows these days is to get enough of a wide net that they capture the majority of an audience. also it seems social media stars or those who have gained a social media following do a heck of allot better on these shows if theres a public vote. mr beast could dominate any of these shows. but so many viewers would still not know who he is
Rick, you weren't filming anything.
Tom Cruise can't act his way out of a paper bag.
Ryan Gosling and Edward Norton are terrific actors.
Most of the Warbutons etc. ads by ‘BIG Hollywoood’ seemed to me, at least, to take place at the height of COVID, when these people were light on work and down to their last $60-70 million, or so.
Never makes me want to buy the product though… quite the reverse! 😜
I wish the people who were always the first to clap after a piece of classical music would be escorted out of the room. Let the music sink in.
It’s the same with streaming services that give you three seconds before they start playing the next episode.
I loved the pandemic sport in silence. The noise of the crowds gives me a headache.
Trump won't get anything close to $3bn if he dumps his shares. The share price doesn't wait until you've finished selling before it tanks. Even ignoring the effect of the founder showing a lack of confidence in the business, there isn't enough liquidity to sell half the business at that share price. There would need to be $3bn worth of investors wanting to buy the shares at that price - who would those be?
@@daviebananas1735 As they said in the podcast, the board can authorise him to sell shares before that and the board is hand picked by him, so that really isn't a factor.
I don’t think Richard really heard what she was saying, I agree with her regarding her educated point of view. Charles‘s mother wouldn’t give up the throne to him because? Why didn’t she? He was youthful too at one point he doesn’t look well, he did not age well.