As an ancient history buff I enjoyed them both very much. It's a tough choice, I'd probably pick Origins just because I prefer ancient Egypt. What a pity Valhalla imho didn't live up to its predecessors though.
I had the most fun playing origins, with Valhalla next and Odyssey last. Odyssey felt so soulless as an open world and i hate the mythology addition. The mythology in origins was tolerable and im a sucker for anything viking which is why im a little more leniant with valhalla.
I'll put it this way, I liked Origins because Ubisoft did the best they can do with a smaller version of Egypt, but I LOVED Odyssey because Ubisoft basically gave gamers a whole history lesson in the form of a video game, I literally love just how accurate Odyssey is with nearly every Ancient Greek island on the map plus the Mythical worlds were S tier DLCs, even though it didn't feel like Assassin's Creed, it was a fun, free for all Assassin's Creed, and I loved every second of it (have over 400 hours of play time btw)
The whole "even though it didn't feel like an AC game..." complaint is oddly cringe, it's like everyone that makes that complaint tend to be the Timmy no thumbs who absolutely suck at gaming and only felt competent with the mechanics of the old games.
@@escapedcops08 no bro, people dislike the new games because theyre so far from what the original fans enjoyed that its not assassins creed anymore. You act like it takes skill to play the new ones anyway lmao
@@escapedcops08 Bro it was nothing like the true AC games I can see what's not there however I believe its a perfect way to show the origins of the Assassins lie the leap of leap and honestly the closet to the AC lore Odyssey did go through was the Isu, which is why I said AC Odyssey has S tier DLCs
I have to agree, after playing Odyssey, I felt like this was great experience. I loved it. I didn't have the same feelings with origins (unless we are talking Dragon Age).
I played AC Odyssey first and loved it. I was never an Assassins' Creed fan, so i treated it as an open world rpg. I then went back and played Origins. Despite Odyssey having improvements in the rpg mechanics, i liked Origins better. The focus on one protagonist, Bayek, made him more compelling than Kassandra/Alexis (or whatever the male version name was). Ancient Egypt was also a more interesting setting to me, though i liked Ancient Greece too. I like both games but Origins is the one i'd replay again. Both are better than Valhalla though, which bored me and i never finished.
@@MillerTheOriginal Yes, Valhalla is - in my opinion - the better game. I admit that Valhalla is very repetitive and the quests are repeated several times. But Valhalla doesn't suffer from the insane logic holes and the side quests that can only be called stupid as hell, which completely spoil an Odyssey. Just the beginning of Odyssey: Kassandra/Alexios are mercenaries who have been living on a rather small island for years. And yet they don't have any useful equipment, don't know their way around their homeland and don't even know where the house of their mentor, who took them in as a child, is located. Plus the daily randomly generated quests from a bulletin board like in an MMO. What shoud that? Odyssey has a grandiose landscape with superbly designed buildings. But these landscapes are meaningless. There is nothing interesting there. Miles of boredom yawning. Only interrupted by small empty spaces, on which the next visit is guaranteed to be a randomly generated camp with 3 soldiers, where the next randomly generated stupid side quest will be forced upon the player. A word about the so-called humor in the game. How old can you be to still be able to laugh at the listed embarrassments? Ten? Twelve? Certainly nothing more.
@@horantelgar8730 interesting opinion. I respect it, certainly dont agree with it. Much of what you said is worse in Valhalla. And Valhalla bring's with it a whole host of more problems. I really do believe that Valhalla was there to appeal to everyone. Which I think it did. I played it and enjoyed it. Then it got boring so I moved on. And so did many others.
Origins is more immersive I´d say but Odyssey is way bigger and has gorgeous world to explore. It catches this "ancient greek mediterrean hot summer sea vibe" perfectly. Loved both games and they are my fav AC games. I was there since day one when AC 1 dropped but Origins and Odyssey got a special place in my heart. I love ancient greece & ancient egypt.
I just cant say enough amazing things about Origins. I'm a hhuggeee fan of Egyptian hystory, so this was such an amazing experience. Haven't played Odyssey yet, but I know it will be good too.
@bingly bingler oh and I totally agree with you. I won't be 100% the game because it's alot of busy work, but I put 60 hours into the game and I did alot of the side missions. I think that's a good amount for a game this size. The time I did spend with it though was really fun!
Origins is a better assassins creed game but Odyssey is just a straight up better game! I would rather have fun with a game then play another ok-ish assassins creed game(most are like that)
I find Origina way better. Moreover in my opinion Odyssey sucks. Letting a player change character's role and influence the story breaks the canon. This option just doesn't match AC franchise.
Is assassins Creed Odyssey better than Origins? My answer is no. Odyssey is not a bad game but it caused me to play Black Flag again. Origins was easier to upgrade, side missions matter in order to make your character stronger. Bootleg mummies, that was cool.bayek was a tough character and I liked how alot of the animals were apart of the story as well.
It's a subjective opinion. If someone likes Origins more, thats 100% valid and correct for them. If someone likes Odyssey more, thats 100% valid and correct for them. If someone likes Valhalla more, same as the others. It's deeply weird how gamers have an obsession with ranking games as if it was objective fact and not just personal preference. Then they get toxic and hostile to anyone that disagrees with their opinion. It's the single worst aspect of the gaming community. It does nothing but breed toxicity and hostile behavior.
Enjoying art is subjective, but there is a level of objectivity analysis that can be applied to any art. Techniques and execution can be superior in one game over another. Obviously, a game being technically superior doesn't mean somebody will enjoy it more, but it does make it more likely. The issue with video games is that people don't understand that liking something more doesn't mean it's better. That's why people get so absurdly toxic about video game analysis and comparison. Most people don't know what conversation is even about and lack the insight, understanding, and education/expertise to be able to meaningfully evaluate a video game in a technical sense. For example, I love Fallout 76. It is my most played game at 900+ hours. But it is objectively a bad game. If somebody said it was the best Fallout game, I would laugh in their face.
@@VegtamTheWonderer The issue is most people tend to think their opinion is objective fact. And if someone said FO76 was the best fallout, that is, in fact, valid, despite your claims otherwise. I dont agree, but it's valid. You, yourself, are making the same mistake i was talking about. Because there are technical aspects you could compare between games, but if thats all you're comparing, you're basically ignoring massive parts of a game. If you only judge games by objective technical metrics, then in your attempts to be objective and impartial, you are infact doing the opposite since you're disqualifying aspects of games that might put one above another for alot of people. Going back to your FO76 example. I played alot of that too, I actually think its pretty good. The lore and world building is, in my opinion , some of the best in the entire series. I'm just not a fan of the grindy "looter shooter" endgame lol. I'd seriously rate it above New Vegas for example cus i think that one is terribly written with bad gameplay. But thats going against common internet opinion.
Yep. About as bad as Far Cry 3 and GTA IV fans. I enjoy both games, but it feels overrated with how people make those games out to be. I played FC4 followed by FC3, and playing FC5 think that's the best Far Cry game. While GTA V wasn't as dark as IV, I actually prefer V over IV. I honestly never understood people who just try to change your mind. Everyone has a preference, and no one has the right to change that. You hate my most favorite, fine. But don't be rude when I don't agree with what you like.
There is always a proportion of players that will agree that a particular game is better. It seems between these two it is purely subjective and very divided, but sometimes a community can quite widely agree on a game being amazing or complete trash. It's always good to know what people think of it before purchasing it.
@@writerlairchannel2636 exactly and when they like something they unfortunately tend to make things personal if someone else is having a different view. I’ve been guilty of this before, but I try my hardest not to be.
Origins is better disregarding location. That being said, people's opinions will be heavily favored due to the location. Personally, I like Greece and Greek mythology more than Egypt and their mythology, so I enjoyed Odyssey more.
Origins is the better assassins creed game and has a good mix of open world. I think it really depends on what you are looking for if you want a more assassins creed game then origins is best. The problem I had with odyssey is the weapons you had to replace so much and literally do all the quests before you could move on. Odyssey isn’t an ac game it could be argued it’s a really good rpg but you could replace the assassins with another name and you couldn’t tell it’s an ac game
I loved Origins, then I played Odyssey. Odyssey is ah-mazing! They are both great! Kassandra honestly makes Odyssey the best though! Her voice actor knocked it out of the park! I also love the Odyssey music better as well!
can't believe some people actually like Kass.... she's a total dude in every sense of the word.... Shao Jun, Evie Fraye, Aveline de Grandpe, & Amunet are better written characters with some having much better character development & guess what, they all act like females! Kass on the other hand carries herself like a high-school jock.....
Odyssey is one of the greatest open world games ever. Kassandra was maybe the best voice actor of alltime and most fun character to play, also the gameplay is insanely fun. Origins was ok but the main character was unlikable and the story not near as fun
Hahaha. You're 'greatest' open-world game is not even among the Top 50 best-selling games lol. Even Valhalla generated more revenue than that garbage. Even the worst-selling CoD game has sold more than AC: Odyssey lmao. You're 'favourite' game is a failure and a disaster that alienated millions of AC fans
I'm not really sure which is "better" as that's a really nebulous term/metric. But I definitely had more FUN playing Odyssey. Namely because I didn't take any of it seriously. So many of the side quests were literally greek comedies, filled with raunchy humor and ridiculous contrivances, I basically just played the thing like a huge play I was acting out. I had my protagonist literally fuck everything the he had the opportunity to fuck, because why not. Always joked and laughed at stuff when it came up. And it was super fun.
@@Link-zm2uz I mean it's your game, you do you. I don't think you're really missing anything if you stop playing Origins. The plots aren't really woven together much. You know, no more than any other AC titles might be. I'll say personally I enjoy the setting or Origins more than Odyssey, but I'm more of an Egyptophile than a Grecophile. But I can definitely say I had more FUN playing Odyssey.
@@Link-zm2uz Maybe? I dunno, I've kind of lost my shine for the AC franchise, and Ubisoft as a company can just go die in a fire as far as I'm concerned. I might do what I did with Valhalla and just play it when it becomes FTP on the playstation store or something 🤷♂
Origins. They can’t compare Odyssey made me feel empty and unaccomplished after 200 hours. I wanted to love it but it just felt boring and every enemy was a bullet sponge. The stealth wasn’t worth it and not having the hidden blade basically made this a weaker Witcher game. Also the whole making the Isu a big deal was awful. I still think it’s the worst part of the RPG series because I don’t care. Origins 10/10 Odyssey 4/10
I prefer more Origins more than Odyssey. As a fan of the Old ac games, origins just felt more like a Assassins creed game than Odyssey did, plus loved Bayek as a character and Egypt was a great setting and had fun exploring each part of the map. Odyssey just felt lifeless at points, although Greece was stunning it just felt soulless and boring after a while, plus felt the RPG and choices could of been better and it focused to much on mythology rather than main real life story, plus hated the level scaling in the game, it just felt levelling up was pointless when every one around you will also level up with you. I did like Odyssey but it just didn't feel like an AC game, just Ubisoft attempt at an RPG game but with AC in the title.
Idc what anyone says, Odyssey and Valhalla are not (assassin)s creed games. Origins is the only one of the RPG series that has anything to do with the REAL assassins(hidden ones)
Ubisoft really piggy backed on the success of their franchise for those. Obviously they did it to get the biggest return on their investment but it's a bit of shame because as good as Odyssey is, it would be even better if it dropped all the pretense and focused on a new unique story.
odyssey is the better option for me,still coming back to it every month to try out new builds, feel like the combat system is better too and its the only one of the 2 i platnumed
Origins was a much better game for the main fact that it made me feel like I was taking a tour through Roman Egypt. Landmarks were distinct and recognizeable. Greece was barely recognizable.
You're kidding me have you even played the game it is brimming with cool locations biomes cities all origins has is Alexandria and it pales in comparison to Athens
The game thats an exact picture of greece didn't look like greece? But the game that's just a blank desert with the occasional landmark fealt more authentic? Excuse you?
I get what he's saying. I, personally, found Odyssey to be better to "look at" but found Origins more immersive in exploring its temples and tombs. BTW, Alexandria wasn't the only "cool" city, there was also Memphis and Cyrene. But "pale" in comparison? I don't think so. There's nothing wrong, however, if you like the architecture style of ancient Greece more than ancient Egypt, but remember, it goes both ways. He may like the style of ancient Egypt more than ancient Greece
I love Odyssey as I love anything to do with Ancient Greece. Completed Mirage and now gone back to Odyssey so still playing it but with Kassandra this time
Interesting video. There are quite alot of factors which make me prefer origins. The ship gameplay, quite a long game (similar to valhalla) and repetition make odyssey my least favourite
I'm not too much into Assassins Creed but I LOVED Odyssey, it is a HUGE game and I LOVED that about it, definitely worth a second play through but good God it's such a big game to start over
When it comes to story, AC Origins. When it comes to combat i prefer Odyssey. Doing spartan kick whenever I'm near a cliff lol. I have more fun playing AC Odyssey than Origins, I like the mercenary system at some of the random side quest (most of them is simple and boring as hell) Though it gets repetitive, still I will choose Odyssey.
Odyssey is ABSOLUTELY better. The amount of little detail they put into this game is cyberpunk worthy. All the way down to the mercenaries to the cultists. It's insane they are a year apart.
Well, having only played Odyssey yet (I got the complete edition of Origins, but didn't started yet, because I already had a bad time finishing the game 100%), I can approve of the first part of this message. Best RPG I played, however, would be Tom Clancy's The Division 2
I absolutely loved Odyssey and playing in ancient Greece. It really isn't a assassin's Creed game I have to admit. That being said I just couldn't get into origins. I know a lot of people really do like it but I just couldn't get into it for whatever reason. Same with Valhalla
Same, I think I played origins for less than 10 hours total. Tried going back to it at least 5 times and couldn't finish it. I've played Odyssey numerous times.
AC Odyssey is a good game without the Assassin's Creed title. The devs wanting to do their own thing while forcefully trying to still connect with the Assassin's Creed story somehow was a draw back. They should have just made it an entirely different game from AC.
Original has more attractive story’s, odyssey has better gameplay, idk why Valhalla removed the ship battle, which is one of the most enjoyable mode in all ac games. If can emphasis the trade between each settlement, odyssey will be an epic game. Unfortunately there are no trading between settlements.
Odyssey is great and a lot better than the original in my opinion, because i can really get immersed in that world. Im female so obviously i play Kasandra, i can connect with her emotions and get really emersed in her story.. Which i can not do playing gas the Male.
origins was a much better story to me. It's not about revenge, it's really about lost. I really felt for him as lost friends, his child, and wife. it really about emotion while odyssey story bored me
Maybe you never lost someone in your life but for me Origins hits home. I can relate to Bayek a lot more. Plus in Origins you get a taste of both Egyptian, and Greek culture as in Odyssey you’re only stuck playing in Greece.
AC Origins is better than Odyssey. Odyssey is too repetitive and lacks originality. It looks like a bad copy of Origins and only surpasses it in ship customization. But in everything else Origins wins (combat system, landscapes, tombs, characters, quest plot, etc..) Despite the size of the map with Origins I never got bored, and I always found something interesting to see or do. To find the enemies there are a series of linked plots full of twists. While on Odyssey it is often enough just to locate them on the map and kill them. Arena battles and the races at the hippodrome are also great in Origins. In Odyssey there is only Pefka's arena which is a bad copy of the Origins arenas. AC Odyssey in my opinion has the worst combat system I've ever seen in an AC. The tombs of the Greek heroes are horrendous and all the same, only the position of the traps and snakes changes. On the contrary, the Egyptian pyramids are fabulous, and are different from each other as well as being accurate from an archaeological point of view. The characters in Odyssey are often recycled and banal, and the conversations feel like a poorly performed play. The possibility of choosing between two protagonists of the opposite sex does not make the story more interesting which on the contrary will always be the same. On the contrary, on Origins we have very interesting characters with very complex relationships like Bayek and Aya or Julius Caesar and Cleopatra.
Well, I prefer AC Odyssey. Mostly because I got to hookup with the hot doctor. I can't remember his name. Playing as Alexios, it was a nice, sweet diversion. Of course, there was also all the killing in the various forts. That was probably my favorite bit of the game. Especially setting a trap at the signal fire first, then just wiping out everyone except the slaves/workers.
imo... After recently playing again, I found Origins was better overall. The story is better written with better written characters and better character development. Odyssey is a bit soulless in its story and overarching series, literally adding next-to-nothing for the franchise except more info on the Isu (which could've just been explained in a text or something, honestly) ... And Kassandra (canon) acts like a straight up dude.....total immersion breaker..... at least Evie, Aveline, Aya, Shao Jun act like females unlike Kassandra who acts like a male...... in Black Flag, Mary Read was a great character & there was a reason why she was the way she was, it made sense, was well-written, etc.... Kassandra, however...... & to top it off Odyssey has one of the weakest stories in the entire franchise with average writing compare to the rest of the series.... combine all that & it makes for a not so great experience... However, Odyssey does expand on the gameplay formula of Origins, making it better in gameplay (but not by much). I think ancient Greece was more fun to be in (like the setting and the view) than Ancient Egypt but I found myself exploring Origins and its tombs more immersive than exploring Odyssey. I like how the DLC of the Hidden Ones felt like a true DLC and added to the franchise of AC whereas the DLC in Odyssey was some cheap Final Fantasy flick that no longer felt AC & instead something entirely different..... (I know Origins had that crossover with FF16, but that has nothing to do with the story and was a little thing for fans of both series)...
Origins of course is better AC game. Even more, you feel 3 cultures Greeks, Egyptian and Roman. Odyssey is a good RPG game but not AC game. I must forget that this game is part of AC franchise to get enjoyment from game. In my opinion - Fate of Atlantis completely destroy the vision of ISU race which is fundamental to the series.
@@paradigmshift7907 The story is better and Bayek is a well done character,also it leads to the creation of the hidden ones which later becomes the Assassin brotherhood.
@@jawonethedon6916 I won’t argue with you there. While I don’t think Origins story was particularly great, it was concise and the characters helped elevate it. Initially I was more in to Odysseys story but it ended up getting dragged out too much
Origins is the far better game than Odyssey; for not to say: Odyssey is pure crap. Some examples: Daily Quests from a Bulletin Board like an MMO? LOL Random Sidequests from also random appearing soldiercamps in the wild? So it can happen, you have to kill the same random person in a village three times in a row. LOL. An open world what not invite you to explore because it is fully boring? i have choosen to solve the game with not more than 40% explored. You have to win the full olympic games and what is need to do? ONE single combat! lol. NPCs simply ignore a living father what stands 5m far from them and act as he would be dead. LOL. The most interesting action in the whole game is sailing the ship. that makes fun. 🙂 Origins i have loved to play. More than one time. And ever yet from time to time i start a new game. Odyssey is deleted from the disc; forever.
Odyssey all the way. Even though I do think Egypt had more character than Greece, Odyssey was superior across the board. The gameplay is better, the skill tree is better, the multiple concurrent main stories are better. Origins, despite being the 'origin' of the Hidden Ones is the least philosophical AC game. Origins was a slog . . . and just went you think its hit the climax, you realize there's still a full chapter to go.
Hated Odyssey. It just didnt feel as polished as Origins but what almost ruined the game for me were the merceneries/Phylakes. It was a ridiculously bad system and completely unrealistic. Every time you get spotted within less than a minute you have a bunch of overpowered merceneries hunting you down.
Assassin’s Creed Origins is most likely four point three times better than Assassin’s Creed Odyssey I know it’s very odd to see when you realize how the Assassin’s Origins exploit the real deal, feel wheel, squeal. Sealed.
Odyssey is better for one fucking reason, has Kassandra, if Origins had Aya as the protagonist then probably will be equal to Odyssey or beat it but with that shit Bayek, no thanks!
It's funny: When Odyssey first came out, so many people dunked on it for not being as good as Origins. Now, with time, calmer emotions, and hindsight, it's more of a 50/50 split and some articles doing "Wasn't Odyssey Great?" pieces. I personally preferred Odyssey more. I had a great deal of wandering around the map, doing side quests, improving my ranking, and killed a lot of of the cult before going back into the main quest and discovering we hadn't actually even been officially told about the cult yet😂. It was just more fun. There was something about Bayek I personally found flat. Though I am doing a second run-through of Origins now to try it again and see if my opinion changes given that people rate it so much higher than me.
@binglybingler2598Same, when i finished origins, it was a while before i played odyssey and thought it might be better. Only for me to go back to play origins and i realised i like it much more
i found Odyssey's characters flat, dull, and immersion breaking compared to Origins' i also found the story written better in Origins only thing Odyssey has is setting and expanded gameplay formula of Origins but Origins is better in almost everything else
@@gustavgustav2670 i mean, she sure does carry herself like one.... it's like hiring a male to do mocap (walks, run, acts like a dude) & then hiring writers who envision a male, i mean, look at her responses when she talks to basically everyone & then look at their responses; in that time, that era, they treat her like she's man.......... it litteraly Alexios as a female skin, no difference except their voices...... since you read my previous comment, you'd know every other female assassin is that much better by comparison, they act like females, walk & talk like females yet still able to do their assassining-shenanigans.... I bet Basim's mentor, Roshan, will be everything fans of Kass claim, & she'll do it as an actual female not a female skin
I like Odyssey the best, but in retrospect it’s probably because it was the first AC game I’ve ever played & so I just have an overwhelming fondness for it. Looking at it more objectively though, it’s definitely not the best AC game, lol. But it’s the one I’ve played the most. Origins had the best story imo-it was completely heart-wrenching. I really didn’t appreciate it though until I played it for a second time.
Eventhough i felt Origins was so good and well ancient Egypt who doesnt like that, i'll say Odyssey bc it brough more into the game and well ancient Greece.. nobody NOBODY can dislike that.. and Kassandra nuf' said 🙂.. as a Dane Valhalla.. was a major dissapointment.. need to do better
Is Odyssey better? No. God no. Not even close. Odyssey is a boring slog with a massive, lifeless map full of copy/pasted assets. The characters are just lame and boring. The story sucked. All these things were easily better in Origins. And Origins wasn't nearly as predatory with it's monetization. Odyssey isn't "deep and complex". The dynamic between the two leads in Origins is FAR more interesting than the bland, boring bs of the family nonsense in Odyssey. The "meaningful choices" don't actually amount to anything that really matter. Assassin's Creed was never meant to be an rpg, and they handle this aspect badly. I'll never understand how anyone can look at the lifelessness of Odyssey, and say it's the superior game. It felt like a total slog the entire time. They didn't even let you be involved in the battle of Thermopylae. Origins gave us Caesar and Cleopatra, and the tumbling of the Egyptian empire. Not to mention Odyssey totally butchered ancient Greek history.
Odyssey for sure. I hate revenge stories. Regardless of whether your Christian or not you can't deny our teachings about revenge are true, "they hurt you more than others."
@@DarkoRavens You're a dork If you thing Valhalla has AC elements. No amount of Social stealth and Hidden robes could be enough for a Viking to be an Assassin. Basim was more of an Assassin in Valhalla rather than Eivor. In Odyssey there was still some element of stealth left but in Valhalla they snatched that too. Now you have to forcefully raid settlements by announcing the trumpet not something any Assassin would ever do.
Short answer. Origins is better. Odyssey is a crime in gaming it is horrible and should never have been made we should have gotten ancient Rome instead
I have close to 1,500 hours on Odyssey... It's by far my favorite Assassins Creed game. Although I also have close to 800 hours on Origins. My one and only complaint about Odyssey is that damn song that plays everytime you pause the game. If you know you know....
@@louiscirigliano5896 i understand you...VALHALLA was the most boring game I ever played...I gave up after 140 hours...ODYSSEY I played 3000 hours...the best...
It’s alright,Origins has a better story and character,odyssey is only fun because your a Demi god and can fight mythical beast as well as go to Atlantis and stuff,it’s more of a stand alone game if anything,since it has no real connection to the franchise other than mentioning Isu which were referred to as the precursor race/first civilization in previous games.
![Assassin’s Creed Origins vs Odyssey [Which Is Better?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DsCyXxtvAsU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Assassin’s Creed Origins vs Odyssey [Which Is Better?]](/img/tr.png)
As an ancient history buff I enjoyed them both very much. It's a tough choice, I'd probably pick Origins just because I prefer ancient Egypt. What a pity Valhalla imho didn't live up to its predecessors though.
I think it's rather fun atm
I had the most fun playing origins, with Valhalla next and Odyssey last. Odyssey felt so soulless as an open world and i hate the mythology addition. The mythology in origins was tolerable and im a sucker for anything viking which is why im a little more leniant with valhalla.
Origins was incredible
TBH Valhalla is one of the best ACs in terms of gameplay.
I pick up the gold edition just because it was dicounted. I thank the stars I bought it really cheap.
I'll put it this way, I liked Origins because Ubisoft did the best they can do with a smaller version of Egypt, but I LOVED Odyssey because Ubisoft basically gave gamers a whole history lesson in the form of a video game, I literally love just how accurate Odyssey is with nearly every Ancient Greek island on the map plus the Mythical worlds were S tier DLCs, even though it didn't feel like Assassin's Creed, it was a fun, free for all Assassin's Creed, and I loved every second of it (have over 400 hours of play time btw)
The whole "even though it didn't feel like an AC game..." complaint is oddly cringe, it's like everyone that makes that complaint tend to be the Timmy no thumbs who absolutely suck at gaming and only felt competent with the mechanics of the old games.
@@escapedcops08 no bro, people dislike the new games because theyre so far from what the original fans enjoyed that its not assassins creed anymore. You act like it takes skill to play the new ones anyway lmao
@@escapedcops08 Bro it was nothing like the true AC games I can see what's not there however I believe its a perfect way to show the origins of the Assassins lie the leap of leap and honestly the closet to the AC lore Odyssey did go through was the Isu, which is why I said AC Odyssey has S tier DLCs
I have to agree, after playing Odyssey, I felt like this was great experience. I loved it. I didn't have the same feelings with origins (unless we are talking Dragon Age).
Guys let's pretend the title doesn't have AC in it and admit it's a good stand alone game 🙂
Yes. Odyssey have many flaws, but it's better game.
No. Not even close.
I played AC Odyssey first and loved it. I was never an Assassins' Creed fan, so i treated it as an open world rpg.
I then went back and played Origins. Despite Odyssey having improvements in the rpg mechanics, i liked Origins better. The focus on one protagonist, Bayek, made him more compelling than Kassandra/Alexis (or whatever the male version name was).
Ancient Egypt was also a more interesting setting to me, though i liked Ancient Greece too. I like both games but Origins is the one i'd replay again. Both are better than Valhalla though, which bored me and i never finished.
Origins is the only one rpg game I've 100%'d
Origins is better than Valhalla, thats true. But Valhalla is much better than this unspeakable Odyssey. (but as ever: its a matter of taste)
@@horantelgar8730Valhalla much better than odyssey? That's definately a hot take
@@MillerTheOriginal Yes, Valhalla is - in my opinion - the better game.
I admit that Valhalla is very repetitive and the quests are repeated several times.
But Valhalla doesn't suffer from the insane logic holes and the side quests that can only be called stupid as hell, which completely spoil an Odyssey.
Just the beginning of Odyssey:
Kassandra/Alexios are mercenaries who have been living on a rather small island for years.
And yet they don't have any useful equipment, don't know their way around their homeland and don't even know where the house of their mentor, who took them in as a child, is located.
Plus the daily randomly generated quests from a bulletin board like in an MMO. What shoud that?
Odyssey has a grandiose landscape with superbly designed buildings. But these landscapes are meaningless. There is nothing interesting there. Miles of boredom yawning. Only interrupted by small empty spaces, on which the next visit is guaranteed to be a randomly generated camp with 3 soldiers, where the next randomly generated stupid side quest will be forced upon the player.
A word about the so-called humor in the game. How old can you be to still be able to laugh at the listed embarrassments? Ten? Twelve? Certainly nothing more.
@@horantelgar8730 interesting opinion. I respect it, certainly dont agree with it. Much of what you said is worse in Valhalla. And Valhalla bring's with it a whole host of more problems. I really do believe that Valhalla was there to appeal to everyone. Which I think it did. I played it and enjoyed it. Then it got boring so I moved on. And so did many others.
Origins is more immersive I´d say but Odyssey is way bigger and has gorgeous world to explore. It catches this "ancient greek mediterrean hot summer sea vibe" perfectly. Loved both games and they are my fav AC games. I was there since day one when AC 1 dropped but Origins and Odyssey got a special place in my heart. I love ancient greece & ancient egypt.
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...ha ha
I just cant say enough amazing things about Origins. I'm a hhuggeee fan of Egyptian hystory, so this was such an amazing experience. Haven't played Odyssey yet, but I know it will be good too.
@bingly bingler oh and I totally agree with you. I won't be 100% the game because it's alot of busy work, but I put 60 hours into the game and I did alot of the side missions. I think that's a good amount for a game this size. The time I did spend with it though was really fun!
Origins is a better assassins creed game but Odyssey is just a straight up better game! I would rather have fun with a game then play another ok-ish assassins creed game(most are like that)
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours....ha ha.
I find Origina way better. Moreover in my opinion Odyssey sucks. Letting a player change character's role and influence the story breaks the canon. This option just doesn't match AC franchise.
Odyssey is the superior game to both Origins and Valhalla imo and even on the base technical level it is the most stable and polished
🧢
@@rensschepers669it is
XD
Origins will always be the best one out of the 3
@@EngineerGamingGuh that's true
Is assassins Creed Odyssey better than Origins? My answer is no. Odyssey is not a bad game but it caused me to play Black Flag again. Origins was easier to upgrade, side missions matter in order to make your character stronger. Bootleg mummies, that was cool.bayek was a tough character and I liked how alot of the animals were apart of the story as well.
It's a subjective opinion. If someone likes Origins more, thats 100% valid and correct for them. If someone likes Odyssey more, thats 100% valid and correct for them. If someone likes Valhalla more, same as the others.
It's deeply weird how gamers have an obsession with ranking games as if it was objective fact and not just personal preference. Then they get toxic and hostile to anyone that disagrees with their opinion.
It's the single worst aspect of the gaming community. It does nothing but breed toxicity and hostile behavior.
Enjoying art is subjective, but there is a level of objectivity analysis that can be applied to any art. Techniques and execution can be superior in one game over another. Obviously, a game being technically superior doesn't mean somebody will enjoy it more, but it does make it more likely. The issue with video games is that people don't understand that liking something more doesn't mean it's better. That's why people get so absurdly toxic about video game analysis and comparison. Most people don't know what conversation is even about and lack the insight, understanding, and education/expertise to be able to meaningfully evaluate a video game in a technical sense. For example, I love Fallout 76. It is my most played game at 900+ hours. But it is objectively a bad game. If somebody said it was the best Fallout game, I would laugh in their face.
@@VegtamTheWonderer The issue is most people tend to think their opinion is objective fact.
And if someone said FO76 was the best fallout, that is, in fact, valid, despite your claims otherwise. I dont agree, but it's valid.
You, yourself, are making the same mistake i was talking about. Because there are technical aspects you could compare between games, but if thats all you're comparing, you're basically ignoring massive parts of a game.
If you only judge games by objective technical metrics, then in your attempts to be objective and impartial, you are infact doing the opposite since you're disqualifying aspects of games that might put one above another for alot of people.
Going back to your FO76 example. I played alot of that too, I actually think its pretty good. The lore and world building is, in my opinion , some of the best in the entire series. I'm just not a fan of the grindy "looter shooter" endgame lol. I'd seriously rate it above New Vegas for example cus i think that one is terribly written with bad gameplay. But thats going against common internet opinion.
Yep. About as bad as Far Cry 3 and GTA IV fans.
I enjoy both games, but it feels overrated with how people make those games out to be. I played FC4 followed by FC3, and playing FC5 think that's the best Far Cry game.
While GTA V wasn't as dark as IV, I actually prefer V over IV.
I honestly never understood people who just try to change your mind. Everyone has a preference, and no one has the right to change that.
You hate my most favorite, fine. But don't be rude when I don't agree with what you like.
There is always a proportion of players that will agree that a particular game is better. It seems between these two it is purely subjective and very divided, but sometimes a community can quite widely agree on a game being amazing or complete trash.
It's always good to know what people think of it before purchasing it.
As *BLOATED* as AC: Odyssey was, I really enjoyed it. It's my second favorite after AC: Syndicate
Id say it’s a very subjective view. I prefer games and movies with lots of humor, therefore I prefer odyssey
Pretty good reasoning here seriously, everything is subjective but people forget about it and simple human decency
@@writerlairchannel2636 exactly and when they like something they unfortunately tend to make things personal if someone else is having a different view. I’ve been guilty of this before, but I try my hardest not to be.
Origins is better disregarding location. That being said, people's opinions will be heavily favored due to the location. Personally, I like Greece and Greek mythology more than Egypt and their mythology, so I enjoyed Odyssey more.
A LOT BETTER, I KEEP PLAYING THE GAME ODYSSEY, EVEN BETTER THAN VALHALLA
Origins is the better assassins creed game and has a good mix of open world. I think it really depends on what you are looking for if you want a more assassins creed game then origins is best. The problem I had with odyssey is the weapons you had to replace so much and literally do all the quests before you could move on. Odyssey isn’t an ac game it could be argued it’s a really good rpg but you could replace the assassins with another name and you couldn’t tell it’s an ac game
Theres no locations in origins that's why it sucks theres no quest but really the main
@@nolanrueckert8061there are like a trillion side quests in Origins lol hell you don't even become an assassin til you beat the main story.
I loved Origins, then I played Odyssey. Odyssey is ah-mazing! They are both great! Kassandra honestly makes Odyssey the best though! Her voice actor knocked it out of the park! I also love the Odyssey music better as well!
Hahaha. If you think Kassandra is actually good, you haven't played enough good games or have little sense of what an actual good character is lol
@@iamyourfather4270 that’s your opinion. Move on. No need to try to belittle someone and be a douche. Bye, troll.
can't believe some people actually like Kass.... she's a total dude in every sense of the word.... Shao Jun, Evie Fraye, Aveline de Grandpe, & Amunet are better written characters with some having much better character development & guess what, they all act like females! Kass on the other hand carries herself like a high-school jock.....
@iamyourfather4270 what on earth are you on about.
The musical score in Odyssey is astonishing
Odyssey is way better. Not even close. It was the pinacle of AC
The ancient Greece setting will always make Odyssey my favorite AC game
Totally agree. You can simply walk, swim, sail, fly and ride around the map with absolute delight
Realizing Alexios in God of War is Kratos’ Brother
They're both great, in different ways. I do slightly favor Odyssey though.
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours....ha ha.
Odyssey is one of the greatest open world games ever. Kassandra was maybe the best voice actor of alltime and most fun character to play, also the gameplay is insanely fun. Origins was ok but the main character was unlikable and the story not near as fun
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours....ha ha.
Hahaha. You're 'greatest' open-world game is not even among the Top 50 best-selling games lol. Even Valhalla generated more revenue than that garbage. Even the worst-selling CoD game has sold more than AC: Odyssey lmao. You're 'favourite' game is a failure and a disaster that alienated millions of AC fans
Chill Alexios was better
I'm not really sure which is "better" as that's a really nebulous term/metric. But I definitely had more FUN playing Odyssey. Namely because I didn't take any of it seriously. So many of the side quests were literally greek comedies, filled with raunchy humor and ridiculous contrivances, I basically just played the thing like a huge play I was acting out. I had my protagonist literally fuck everything the he had the opportunity to fuck, because why not. Always joked and laughed at stuff when it came up. And it was super fun.
“FUN” is just as nebulous idiot 😂
Is it a shame if i stop origins to play odyssey. I want to See ancient greek so bad and the choices the sea everything
@@Link-zm2uz I mean it's your game, you do you. I don't think you're really missing anything if you stop playing Origins. The plots aren't really woven together much. You know, no more than any other AC titles might be. I'll say personally I enjoy the setting or Origins more than Odyssey, but I'm more of an Egyptophile than a Grecophile. But I can definitely say I had more FUN playing Odyssey.
@@happyninja42 thanks for the advice appreciate it. You Looping forward to mirage?
@@Link-zm2uz Maybe? I dunno, I've kind of lost my shine for the AC franchise, and Ubisoft as a company can just go die in a fire as far as I'm concerned. I might do what I did with Valhalla and just play it when it becomes FTP on the playstation store or something 🤷♂
Origins. They can’t compare
Odyssey made me feel empty and unaccomplished after 200 hours. I wanted to love it but it just felt boring and every enemy was a bullet sponge. The stealth wasn’t worth it and not having the hidden blade basically made this a weaker Witcher game. Also the whole making the Isu a big deal was awful. I still think it’s the worst part of the RPG series because I don’t care.
Origins 10/10
Odyssey 4/10
In my opinion Odyssey is the better game. I also believe that Kassandra is the best protagonist in the series, but again, that's my opinion.
I agree and my heart was happy when I saw her show up, even if momentarily, in Valhalla. Basim can suck a d*ck for what he did to her.
Kassandra is an average protagonist...Ezio and Bayek have more depth than her.
Odyssey is definitely better than the three rpg trilogy
I prefer more Origins more than Odyssey. As a fan of the Old ac games, origins just felt more like a Assassins creed game than Odyssey did, plus loved Bayek as a character and Egypt was a great setting and had fun exploring each part of the map. Odyssey just felt lifeless at points, although Greece was stunning it just felt soulless and boring after a while, plus felt the RPG and choices could of been better and it focused to much on mythology rather than main real life story, plus hated the level scaling in the game, it just felt levelling up was pointless when every one around you will also level up with you. I did like Odyssey but it just didn't feel like an AC game, just Ubisoft attempt at an RPG game but with AC in the title.
Idc what anyone says, Odyssey and Valhalla are not (assassin)s creed games. Origins is the only one of the RPG series that has anything to do with the REAL assassins(hidden ones)
Ubisoft really piggy backed on the success of their franchise for those. Obviously they did it to get the biggest return on their investment but it's a bit of shame because as good as Odyssey is, it would be even better if it dropped all the pretense and focused on a new unique story.
odyssey is the better option for me,still coming back to it every month to try out new builds, feel like the combat system is better too and its the only one of the 2 i platnumed
Origins was a much better game for the main fact that it made me feel like I was taking a tour through Roman Egypt. Landmarks were distinct and recognizeable. Greece was barely recognizable.
You're kidding me have you even played the game it is brimming with cool locations biomes cities all origins has is Alexandria and it pales in comparison to Athens
The game thats an exact picture of greece didn't look like greece? But the game that's just a blank desert with the occasional landmark fealt more authentic? Excuse you?
Are you joking right?? clearly you havent played odyssey... Go play the game and then have opinion. Greece >> desert every single time.
I get what he's saying. I, personally, found Odyssey to be better to "look at" but found Origins more immersive in exploring its temples and tombs. BTW, Alexandria wasn't the only "cool" city, there was also Memphis and Cyrene. But "pale" in comparison? I don't think so. There's nothing wrong, however, if you like the architecture style of ancient Greece more than ancient Egypt, but remember, it goes both ways. He may like the style of ancient Egypt more than ancient Greece
@@eltren6120 so in other words you're a tomb raider over uncharted kinda guy. Got chya.
i loved sailing on my ship in Odyssey
odyssey is better both love both. wish Aya was playable character regularly
I love Odyssey as I love anything to do with Ancient Greece. Completed Mirage and now gone back to Odyssey so still playing it but with Kassandra this time
Interesting video. There are quite alot of factors which make me prefer origins. The ship gameplay, quite a long game (similar to valhalla) and repetition make odyssey my least favourite
I love odyssey. It's ruined me for all other games.
Personally I like both games 🎮, but that is me.
Yep.
Odyssey is just much more fun with more abilities and the setting is better in Odyssey too.
Odyssey is much better
I'm not too much into Assassins Creed but I LOVED Odyssey, it is a HUGE game and I LOVED that about it, definitely worth a second play through but good God it's such a big game to start over
When it comes to story, AC Origins. When it comes to combat i prefer Odyssey. Doing spartan kick whenever I'm near a cliff lol.
I have more fun playing AC Odyssey than Origins, I like the mercenary system at some of the random side quest (most of them is simple and boring as hell) Though it gets repetitive, still I will choose Odyssey.
Odyssey is ABSOLUTELY better. The amount of little detail they put into this game is cyberpunk worthy. All the way down to the mercenaries to the cultists. It's insane they are a year apart.
Yes. Odyssey.
Odyssey is not only my fav AC game but probably one of the best RPGs ever made
Well, having only played Odyssey yet (I got the complete edition of Origins, but didn't started yet, because I already had a bad time finishing the game 100%), I can approve of the first part of this message. Best RPG I played, however, would be Tom Clancy's The Division 2
Witcher 3
@@MalikBarrow16 masterpiece
If you think that, you should definitely play more games.
Odyssey is the better game but Bayek and Egypt make me prefer Origins.
Seems like everyone like Odyssey cause it has more sex 😂
I absolutely loved Odyssey and playing in ancient Greece. It really isn't a assassin's Creed game I have to admit. That being said I just couldn't get into origins. I know a lot of people really do like it but I just couldn't get into it for whatever reason. Same with Valhalla
Same, I think I played origins for less than 10 hours total. Tried going back to it at least 5 times and couldn't finish it. I've played Odyssey numerous times.
@@OhShanna Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours....ha ha.
AC Odyssey is a good game without the Assassin's Creed title. The devs wanting to do their own thing while forcefully trying to still connect with the Assassin's Creed story somehow was a draw back. They should have just made it an entirely different game from AC.
Original has more attractive story’s, odyssey has better gameplay, idk why Valhalla removed the ship battle, which is one of the most enjoyable mode in all ac games. If can emphasis the trade between each settlement, odyssey will be an epic game. Unfortunately there are no trading between settlements.
Odyssey is great and a lot better than the original in my opinion, because i can really get immersed in that world. Im female so obviously i play Kasandra, i can connect with her emotions and get really emersed in her story..
Which i can not do playing gas the Male.
Bayek is far better than Kassandra..But I get why you like her.
Origins : best ost, better story, better character
Eeasy win
To be honest, Storywise Origins was better than Odyssey. But gameplay, especially combat with superpowers in Odyssey was cool.
origins was a much better story to me. It's not about revenge, it's really about lost. I really felt for him as lost friends, his child, and wife. it really about emotion while odyssey story bored me
lemme put it this way. I completed Odyssey, didn't complete Origins.
Both are good though.
Odyssey is more expansive and with the powers of the Gods I feel like Oddessius or Hercules.
Maybe you never lost someone in your life but for me Origins hits home. I can relate to Bayek a lot more. Plus in Origins you get a taste of both Egyptian, and Greek culture as in Odyssey you’re only stuck playing in Greece.
AC Origins is better than Odyssey. Odyssey is too repetitive and lacks originality. It looks like a bad copy of Origins and only surpasses it in ship customization. But in everything else Origins wins (combat system, landscapes, tombs, characters, quest plot, etc..) Despite the size of the map with Origins I never got bored, and I always found something interesting to see or do. To find the enemies there are a series of linked plots full of twists. While on Odyssey it is often enough just to locate them on the map and kill them. Arena battles and the races at the hippodrome are also great in Origins. In Odyssey there is only Pefka's arena which is a bad copy of the Origins arenas. AC Odyssey in my opinion has the worst combat system I've ever seen in an AC. The tombs of the Greek heroes are horrendous and all the same, only the position of the traps and snakes changes. On the contrary, the Egyptian pyramids are fabulous, and are different from each other as well as being accurate from an archaeological point of view. The characters in Odyssey are often recycled and banal, and the conversations feel like a poorly performed play. The possibility of choosing between two protagonists of the opposite sex does not make the story more interesting which on the contrary will always be the same. On the contrary, on Origins we have very interesting characters with very complex relationships like Bayek and Aya or Julius Caesar and Cleopatra.
Well, I prefer AC Odyssey. Mostly because I got to hookup with the hot doctor. I can't remember his name. Playing as Alexios, it was a nice, sweet diversion.
Of course, there was also all the killing in the various forts. That was probably my favorite bit of the game. Especially setting a trap at the signal fire first, then just wiping out everyone except the slaves/workers.
Its not ancient egypt... Its 43bc not 3000bc....
Odyssey for me...orgin is good but Odyssey was a love letter to us...we will never get a game like that again
imo... After recently playing again, I found Origins was better overall. The story is better written with better written characters and better character development. Odyssey is a bit soulless in its story and overarching series, literally adding next-to-nothing for the franchise except more info on the Isu (which could've just been explained in a text or something, honestly) ... And Kassandra (canon) acts like a straight up dude.....total immersion breaker..... at least Evie, Aveline, Aya, Shao Jun act like females unlike Kassandra who acts like a male...... in Black Flag, Mary Read was a great character & there was a reason why she was the way she was, it made sense, was well-written, etc.... Kassandra, however...... & to top it off Odyssey has one of the weakest stories in the entire franchise with average writing compare to the rest of the series.... combine all that & it makes for a not so great experience...
However, Odyssey does expand on the gameplay formula of Origins, making it better in gameplay (but not by much). I think ancient Greece was more fun to be in (like the setting and the view) than Ancient Egypt but I found myself exploring Origins and its tombs more immersive than exploring Odyssey. I like how the DLC of the Hidden Ones felt like a true DLC and added to the franchise of AC whereas the DLC in Odyssey was some cheap Final Fantasy flick that no longer felt AC & instead something entirely different..... (I know Origins had that crossover with FF16, but that has nothing to do with the story and was a little thing for fans of both series)...
Origins of course is better AC game. Even more, you feel 3 cultures Greeks, Egyptian and Roman. Odyssey is a good RPG game but not AC game. I must forget that this game is part of AC franchise to get enjoyment from game. In my opinion - Fate of Atlantis completely destroy the vision of ISU race which is fundamental to the series.
Odyssey is a better game, it’s just not the traditional “assassins creed” game fans think it should be
When it comes to combat it’s a fun game wouldn’t say it’s overall better though.
@@jawonethedon6916 What about Origins do you prefer?
@@paradigmshift7907 The story is better and Bayek is a well done character,also it leads to the creation of the hidden ones which later becomes the Assassin brotherhood.
@@jawonethedon6916 I won’t argue with you there. While I don’t think Origins story was particularly great, it was concise and the characters helped elevate it.
Initially I was more in to Odysseys story but it ended up getting dragged out too much
@@paradigmshift7907 yeah odyssey’s story was a bit extra but it still was interesting,still mad they killed off phoibe though
Origins is the far better game than Odyssey; for not to say: Odyssey is pure crap.
Some examples:
Daily Quests from a Bulletin Board like an MMO? LOL
Random Sidequests from also random appearing soldiercamps in the wild? So it can happen, you have to kill the same random person in a village three times in a row. LOL.
An open world what not invite you to explore because it is fully boring? i have choosen to solve the game with not more than 40% explored.
You have to win the full olympic games and what is need to do? ONE single combat! lol.
NPCs simply ignore a living father what stands 5m far from them and act as he would be dead. LOL.
The most interesting action in the whole game is sailing the ship. that makes fun. 🙂
Origins i have loved to play. More than one time. And ever yet from time to time i start a new game. Odyssey is deleted from the disc; forever.
Odyssey all the way. Even though I do think Egypt had more character than Greece, Odyssey was superior across the board. The gameplay is better, the skill tree is better, the multiple concurrent main stories are better. Origins, despite being the 'origin' of the Hidden Ones is the least philosophical AC game. Origins was a slog . . . and just went you think its hit the climax, you realize there's still a full chapter to go.
I think Odyssey is best but after a fun climb, I did spend some time on top of the Great Pyramid 2 days ago. Just checking things out. It was a blast!
Hated Odyssey. It just didnt feel as polished as Origins but what almost ruined the game for me were the merceneries/Phylakes. It was a ridiculously bad system and completely unrealistic. Every time you get spotted within less than a minute you have a bunch of overpowered merceneries hunting you down.
Assassin’s Creed Origins is most likely four point three times better than Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
I know it’s very odd to see when you realize how the Assassin’s Origins exploit the real deal, feel wheel, squeal. Sealed.
Odyssey is better for one fucking reason, has Kassandra, if Origins had Aya as the protagonist then probably will be equal to Odyssey or beat it but with that shit Bayek, no thanks!
Odyssey all the way ❤
Oddissey is a good game. Origins is not. The systems in oddissey are really solid. Also in a subjective point of view I like the characters better.
How come I don't ever see anybody play as Alexios?
Because Kassandra is canon and so much better
Both Amazing! But Origins is pure Magic!
It's funny: When Odyssey first came out, so many people dunked on it for not being as good as Origins. Now, with time, calmer emotions, and hindsight, it's more of a 50/50 split and some articles doing "Wasn't Odyssey Great?" pieces.
I personally preferred Odyssey more. I had a great deal of wandering around the map, doing side quests, improving my ranking, and killed a lot of of the cult before going back into the main quest and discovering we hadn't actually even been officially told about the cult yet😂. It was just more fun. There was something about Bayek I personally found flat. Though I am doing a second run-through of Origins now to try it again and see if my opinion changes given that people rate it so much higher than me.
@binglybingler2598Same, when i finished origins, it was a while before i played odyssey and thought it might be better. Only for me to go back to play origins and i realised i like it much more
i found Odyssey's characters flat, dull, and immersion breaking compared to Origins'
i also found the story written better in Origins
only thing Odyssey has is setting and expanded gameplay formula of Origins
but Origins is better in almost everything else
@eltren6120 yeah but you seem to think kassandra is a 'high school jock' so I'll take your opinion under advisement .
@@gustavgustav2670 i mean, she sure does carry herself like one.... it's like hiring a male to do mocap (walks, run, acts like a dude) & then hiring writers who envision a male, i mean, look at her responses when she talks to basically everyone & then look at their responses; in that time, that era, they treat her like she's man.......... it litteraly Alexios as a female skin, no difference except their voices...... since you read my previous comment, you'd know every other female assassin is that much better by comparison, they act like females, walk & talk like females yet still able to do their assassining-shenanigans.... I bet Basim's mentor, Roshan, will be everything fans of Kass claim, & she'll do it as an actual female not a female skin
I just CAN'T finish the game. It's SO DULL. You are not alone.
I like Odyssey the best, but in retrospect it’s probably because it was the first AC game I’ve ever played & so I just have an overwhelming fondness for it. Looking at it more objectively though, it’s definitely not the best AC game, lol. But it’s the one I’ve played the most. Origins had the best story imo-it was completely heart-wrenching. I really didn’t appreciate it though until I played it for a second time.
Eventhough i felt Origins was so good and well ancient Egypt who doesnt like that, i'll say Odyssey bc it brough more into the game and well ancient Greece.. nobody NOBODY can dislike that.. and Kassandra nuf' said 🙂.. as a Dane Valhalla.. was a major dissapointment.. need to do better
Both perfectly good except I would pick odyssey just bc of the navel combat. I love that shii😂
Origins combat is awful. You can't dodge when you're hit just stood there and take them blows lol
Is Odyssey better? No. God no. Not even close. Odyssey is a boring slog with a massive, lifeless map full of copy/pasted assets. The characters are just lame and boring. The story sucked. All these things were easily better in Origins. And Origins wasn't nearly as predatory with it's monetization.
Odyssey isn't "deep and complex". The dynamic between the two leads in Origins is FAR more interesting than the bland, boring bs of the family nonsense in Odyssey.
The "meaningful choices" don't actually amount to anything that really matter. Assassin's Creed was never meant to be an rpg, and they handle this aspect badly.
I'll never understand how anyone can look at the lifelessness of Odyssey, and say it's the superior game. It felt like a total slog the entire time. They didn't even let you be involved in the battle of Thermopylae. Origins gave us Caesar and Cleopatra, and the tumbling of the Egyptian empire.
Not to mention Odyssey totally butchered ancient Greek history.
Odyssey is better in my opinion. I love non-linear stories and the freedom of player choice.
Why do the characters in odyssey look so tiny
Odyssey for sure. I hate revenge stories. Regardless of whether your Christian or not you can't deny our teachings about revenge are true, "they hurt you more than others."
Origins is the better ac game because it has actual assassin’s
cant believe people are actually choosing odyssey over origins!
Odyssey possibly just pips Origins in my opinion. I prefer both to Valhalla though, which is also a good game, but is just too bloated.
First play through I thought origins was better. On subsequent play throughs odyssey is better hands down.
I love Odyssey but let's not fool ourselves It has nothing to do with Assassins. Same goes for Valhalla.
Wrong.
Valhalla has the Assassin's Creed established already. Hidden blades, social stealth, and Assassins.
Odyssey is dog water.
@@DarkoRavens You're a dork If you thing Valhalla has AC elements. No amount of Social stealth and Hidden robes could be enough for a Viking to be an Assassin. Basim was more of an Assassin in Valhalla rather than Eivor. In Odyssey there was still some element of stealth left but in Valhalla they snatched that too. Now you have to forcefully raid settlements by announcing the trumpet not something any Assassin would ever do.
i have played them all - bar the new one and i loved Odyssey. Origins was good but i really enjoyed Odyssey more overall
Most reviews I saw put Origins above Odyssey, and each of these open world versions got worse and more grindy.
Story wise Origins is better but content wise Odyssey is better
I'm playing Origins now, but I'm pretty sure I'll be playing Odyssey next because of your recommendations 😂
Odyssey leveling system was horrendous… everything else was perfection
Short answer. Origins is better. Odyssey is a crime in gaming it is horrible and should never have been made we should have gotten ancient Rome instead
Cassandra makes more sense to be deimos
Odyssey is unbeatable
I have close to 1,500 hours on Odyssey... It's by far my favorite Assassins Creed game. Although I also have close to 800 hours on Origins. My one and only complaint about Odyssey is that damn song that plays everytime you pause the game. If you know you know....
And valhalla how many hours you played!
@@zicuvalentin2251 only 25 hours, I wasn't feeling it.
@@louiscirigliano5896 i understand you...VALHALLA was the most boring game I ever played...I gave up after 140 hours...ODYSSEY I played 3000 hours...the best...
Odyssey is the better than Origins and Valhalla. Best of the "RPG three."
No. No it's not. Just play Black Flag
This!
As a game odyssey is better and funner combat was way more fluid than origins
I like Odyssey better they did a good job on the graphics and gameplay
Origins hands down for me. Really enjoyed both but Origins was different
Odyssey with all its DLCs is to my taste the best game ever created.
I love oddesy but origins is good but nah I prefer ACO
Odyssey is by far the better game...
It’s alright,Origins has a better story and character,odyssey is only fun because your a Demi god and can fight mythical beast as well as go to Atlantis and stuff,it’s more of a stand alone game if anything,since it has no real connection to the franchise other than mentioning Isu which were referred to as the precursor race/first civilization in previous games.