Galaxy S24 Snapdragon vs S24 Exynos vs S23 | Battery Test RAW
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 лют 2024
- This video is not monetized!
My critiques in previous videos were not aimed at Samsung or Exynos; in fact, I find it great that we have more chipset manufacturing capacity with more players. My concern is more about ensuring consumers are well-informed, especially regarding key components like chipsets and having proper regulations in place. This channel, "TechmoRAW," is a new way to share the documentation with you with a minimum amount of editing. To drive the conclusion and make the best purchasing decision, watch other UA-camrs who conducted other tests on Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Related videos:
Techmo (My main channel )
• Samsung S23 vs S24 Exy...
The Tech Chap
• Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs ...
Booredatwork.com
• Snapdragon vs Exynos -...
Also thank you to everyone who has supported me through this period; your positive feedback has been incredibly uplifting.
i hate samsung for giving europe exynos.. the difference in battery is huge...
Very interesting, thank you for additional power saving test !
So safe to say buying s23 over s24 ( exynos ) is a better choice and you will also get it at a cheaper price
but i love the s24 design more 😢
@@bolsterwow You will probably put it in to a case anyway, right? You won't see the difference. I had the same dilemma. I chose S23 in the end. But, if the price plays no role for you, take S24. It's not a bad phone. It was just expected to be better...
@@Jiri_Peterka yeah i will have a case
@bolsterwow yeah, the frame is the same as iphone make more comfortable in hand
@@jojoclub5215 i got my s24 with case yesterday lol
I'll get the s23 instead of s24. No overheating issues means better battery life in the long run
But in this video s23 and s24ex same battery drain
@@rustammetelin4606exactly. Which means the s23 will have longer battery life in the long run compared to s24 exinos
Hi Mo, these tests you're doing are really good and actually really what I'm looking for on youtube. Fair and equal comparison between devices.
I've two questions: one about this video and one about probably a future video:
You mentioned you would test light performance mode in this video, but I only see you using power saving mode. Maybe I've missed it, but as far as I know those two are different. Light performance mode can be found under Device Care and when I turn it on I get significantly lower scores in 3DMark and it produces less heat. When I watch your video where you only turn on Power saving mode, the scores in 3Dmark are pretty much the same. Maybe the 70% cpu claim of samsung isn't that accurate in benchmarks. But in Light Performance mode it does. Could you try it again on Light performance mode?
The second question: I really like your way of testing and you're taking a lot of effort in making this content. Maybe you could go a step further and test both variants of the s24+? I know, that means shipping another device from the US/CA and that costs a lot of money, but the reason I'm asking is that other reviewers and UA-camrs seem to get way better results for the Exynos 2400 chip in the S24+ compared to the basemodel S24.
For example:
tweakers.net/reviews/11752/7/samsung-galaxy-s24-en-s24+-fijne-update-ondanks-exynos-accuduur-en-opladen.html
Above is a review (in Dutch) about the the S24 and S24+ (Exynos version as Tweakers is located in the Netherlands) and you see really good results at the battery test for the S24+ (link above is linked to the battery test page). Actually in 1080p resolution AND 1440p it scores best of all phones they've ever tested.
Now the following link is referring to the S24 Ultra review also written by Tweakers (they also test their phones in a really professional closed off lab):
tweakers.net/reviews/11782/7/samsung-galaxy-s24-ultra-een-snufje-titanium-en-een-schep-ai-accuduur-en-opladen.html
This review was written later then the first one. That's why the Ultra results are not showing in the S24 and S24+ review.
The tests show actually better results for the S24+ compared to the Snapdragon S24 Ultra. Even the browsing 4g test does better. And at the same time the S24 base model is doing worse then the S23 base model, just like you found out. I don't really understand these results as the chip in the s24 and s24+ are the same, but the battery drainage is not in proportion between the two.
Also this youtuber is showing better battery results for the Exynos version of the S24+
ua-cam.com/video/FxE5h8Gh7SY/v-deo.html
Strange isn't it?
Just think about it. I'd really appreciate your way of testing and your content!
Hi, indeed interesting. My personal tests shows that S24 Ultra is doing much better in battery terms compared to S24+ Exynos:
ua-cam.com/video/WX1wLnNUYDE/v-deo.html
Also GSMARENA shows similar results. For example, S24+ is not doing as great as S23+ in battery life despite larger battery capacity.
I am not saying the links you shared are wrong, different test conditions can yield different results, so each test to their own. For example the UA-camr you mentioned tested gaming on Wi-Fi.
Regarding future videos, I don't plan to buy S24+ global version right now, as you mentioned I unfortunately do not have resources to import this version to test. It could be the case that S24+ Exynos is closer to S24+ Snapdragon since the phone is bigger and laws of thermodynamics can be in Exynos favor. If Sasmung send me the devices I would be happy to test it, but I doubt they will do so :P
I appreciate the time you put into writing the comment.
Wifi ain't mobile use, watch 4G results.
Even if tht makes non-simultaneous results vulnerable to external factors:
Changes in cellular network/different amount interference at radio waves/different amount of users.
Ik hoor je, het is gewoon zn grijs vlak je weet niet meer wat je nou moet geloven.
Why are during Camera 1:41 the both S24 switching so often GPS On/OFF and the S23 dont ? Maybe S23 Geogating is deactivated or what could be the reason?
It is so helpful and pricy. Thank you
got exynos version. very disapointing
I got it too. Don't be disappointed it's still a really good phone and 6h should easily get you through the day
@@braincytox7314there's 24h in a day not 6h
Have it too but very sad to know it could be so much better with snapdragon
Thanks for updating the test! May I ask if the battery life would be better if I would run the S24 Exynos only on 4G/LTE? Or will it get even worse? As far a I'm informed one of the main problems is the high power draw of the Exynos modem.
It would be better. 5G connection is essentially being connected to multiple antennas.
@@TechmoRAW Thanks for the quick reply! :)
@@TechmoRAW In my country there are no 5G networks at all, so 4G is the best option for communication. True, I have a version Snapdragon 😅
S24+ - SEVEN years software upgrades.
If yo are coming from something like an S20 or something like that - then this upgrade is amazing even with the EX chip.
Also - unless you get it form the US - you can't get the SD chip anyway haha.
The upgrade path is great if you are coming from far back.
If you have the S23 ... or possibly an S22.. I wonder how much better it is. Doesn't seem like your life will be significantly different unless you are using your phone as a video camera etc.
One thing that seems to be real though is that if you have something before the S22...or S21...This seems like a real and really good update.
The problem is that exynos definitely won't survive 7 years, not with that overheating issues. So S23 is the obvious better choice if you are forced to buy S24 exynos.
@myolgiden A midrange chip from 2018 can run fine today. A flagship exynos will also do fine in 7 years. No need to over exaggerate. It still has great ram, storage speeds which matters more in daily usage.
Battery will long degrade before phone slowing due to processor. Also it only overheats in extreme test, not normal usage.
still using s20 exynos
@@myolgiden Whether it will live up to 7 years or not depends on Samsung's updates deciding to stifle the performance of the exynos chip like they did, but with a 7 year commitment I think they won't do that, the other thing is. depends on whether the dev is willing to optimize the application for the exynos chip or not, the exynos chip itself is not weak, it just does not have worse battery life and is 2 - 5 degrees Celsius hotter than the snap version at the same time Point is, the fact that many models have difficulty with Exynos chips is simply because the developers do not care about optimization and continued support.
Why is S24 SD on LTE while the two others are on 4G+?
I didn't expect Exynos to surprise me, but being marginally *worse* than last year's SD is shameful. People keep saying in the comments that it's not bad, and I agree that it's not bad, because the S23 is a great phone, and S24 is on pair with it. It just doesn't make any sense to spend extra for S24 instead of an well optimised and cheaper S23.
The way I see it benchmark apps and video conference destroys the exynos but nobody uses it this way that much. That means that for the regular human being: texting, using social media, Web browsing, a couple of calls via WhatsApp or telegram, UA-cam, email, won't really hurt the phone. Eventually when you use the GPS and take some pictures - unless you use it too much - won't play much of a role. The only part that sucks big time are the same old cameras, no upgrade in years, it's like a midrange phone basically. I have a Huawei P40 pro and I'm still shocked when pixel peeping the pictures are so much better and it's a 4 year old phone
Worser design/tech modem hurts precisely that standby and traditional phone use more than these heavier video involving tests.
If you missed it, GSMArena's test had 20% drop in talk time from S23 despite of Exynos S24 having slightly bigger battery.
Also first hour of testing in this video was using Wifi and not mobile data decreasing Snapdragon's modem advantage.
With always screen on also giving another headstart for Exynos S24 having LTPO screen allowing saving power compared to S23.
Hello can you do a test with the s24+ compared to the ultra?
ua-cam.com/video/WX1wLnNUYDE/v-deo.html
Buying S24 exynos is essentially buying S23 SDGen2. Lol
Android Authority is a load of bullocks. Showing only graphs 😂. I aint falling for that. I've been an auditor and I need believable evidence.
Thanks Mo for this. ❤
And S23/Sd8Gen2 is actually handicapped by fixed refresh rate screen.
So with power saving enabling LTPO screen Sd8 Gen2 would beat Exynos S24 by more than marginally.
Well, maybe Samsung brings that FE version with last year's chipset to give European non-ultra model without Exynos.
Though in my eyes that's too late and too little/wrong model.
No, S23 is better than S24 exynos. Better stability, less heat, more battery life. And also performs better in real life usage. S23 also beats S24 exynos in some synthetic benchmarks as well, as you can see in this video.
S23 also cheaper than S24 exynos.
To be frankly, S24 exynos should have been the S23 fe.
it is possible, samsung will optimize some procesess to get more work time on exynos phones?
Most likely . The exynos 2200 in the 23fe is loads better than the 2200 in the s22
Don't buy anything with the idea that it will be fixed in the future. Corporations (and especially Samsung and apple) are under 0 obligation to do so, it's a waste of money for them, after the sale.
@@Vordigon1Reputation matters. Also they are about to release their dream team exynos chip.
@@frankreynolds9930 I stopped relying on promises with the galaxy 5s promised additional features. That said, I did get the s23 recently as that will be a good phone for at least 5 or so years.
I am confused between S23(8/128) vs S24(8/256) which one should I go for price difference is S23(USD 371.79) and S24(USD 539.69) ,
Thanks for doing this , the big question now is will firmware updates improve exynos performance..
There is nothing wrong with its performance but the issue is its efficiency and weak mobile reception.
thats is poor performance.@@kirayamatofication
I used S24 for two days and felt the CPU to be getting warm quickly. I have returned it back because of Exynos’ history and planning to buy S23
Firmware changes can certainly affect balancing between processing performance and power consumption.
But would think that with Samsung's resources they have already tuned firmware well for Exynos and some power efficiency has already been sacrificed.
And software can't correct Exynos not having as good modem as Snapdragon.
also camera performance, i tested one and was shocked, the camera has gone backwards from the s23@@kirayamatofication
S23 champ
I'm surprised you kept 5G on while using power saving mode! what's the point really when it's very power hungry. Also surprised that the weakest part of S24 Ex battery seems to be 4G/LTE reception as shown in the video while 5G and WiFi looks fine.
Because then it would not have been fair. S24 SD does not have an option to turn off 5G during power saving mode.
@@TechmoRAW but but.. You could turn if off manually in the carrier settings?
@@alex.starostin Hmmm to be honest I did not think of it. The thing is on light performance mode the battery is on 70%, so at least we kind of tested that 😀
@@TechmoRAW Anyway.. The test shows once again that there's no sense in buying S24 Exynos if you live in Europe instead of just buying S23 for half the price
@@alex.starostinthats true yeah but the exynos s24+ Was actually 100€ cheaper for me than the cheapest s23+. Not the best phone but still a good Deal imo.
gsmarena gave batter battery score to S24 EX in comparsion to S23, so you are saying they are lying ?
different tests, different apps , different results + margin of error
Hi Mo! Can you simulate a long summer trip? I mean 35celsius, 4g and navigation, with some battery saver/reduced cpu mode?
You can get agricurtural heat mats for seedlings. They are dirt cheap, and can simulate heat... Or just a hike to the alps, with heated jacket ;)
Hey, summer is close haha I'll do a trip to Italy maybe I do this test.
@@TechmoRAW Try out Albania. More lower reception places, kind locals ,and more meat for your money :)
s24 plus EX vs s23 plus SD please 👍
Even the old s23 beats the new exynos s24 with upgraded battery capacity!
Shame.
I understand that the exynos is much better for their bottom line, but you can not sell the same phone with such an inferior processor.
They should either go with full on exynos or snapdragon.
10% battery difference is big for same gen device. If samsung isn't able to solve this quickly or before s25, I see this as a L
Thanks for making this video. I'm planning to get the S24+ 512gb version. I hope this is a good decision
But you just saw the proof before your eyes. How can it be a good decision 😂 the s24+ won't be better than its predecessor.
It's a good decision if you manage to get the SD version
I asked everyone about Exynos on Reddit, and they think people are lying about how bad exynos is 😂 they need to watch this video
Most of ppl on Reddit havent suffer an Exynos device ever.
That's Reddit for you, lol. I don't take it seriously
I like my 6 yo Samsung Galaxy S9+ Exynos edition, best phone ever. I'm using it to this day without battery change. I'm thinking about upgrading to S24+ though
Yeah! If the difference was only about 2-3% but this is 14%!!! It's way too much!
@JoseAntNS I'm definitely not suffering with my S24 Exynos, it's lightning fast
I bought my S24 for 310Euros in total, so i need to tell me to be happy with it over and over again 😅
How that cheap?
😅😂
So i stay with my S23 till there is something better....
The battery life of the Galaxy S24 EX looks weak, it currently costs 120€ more than the S23 (EU Version) in the 256 GB version, the Galaxy AI features will soon come via update and the camera is the same (pictures with S24 are only better thanks to software). The only good thing of the S24 is the thinner display bezels and 0.1 inches more display. I currently have a Samsung Galaxy S21 256 GB, but I'm not happy with it because of a green line in the right end and disconnections while charging in the train or bus. The USB C port could be demaged. Actually, I wanted to use my S21 until end of January 2025, but until then it's still so long and I don't know if Samsung will build a smartphone with the S25 that is much better than its predecessors in all areas. Should I keep my S21 until January 2025 or buy a Samsung Galaxy S23 now? 🤔 I don't know what to do know. 😔
I returned the S24 yesterday and gonna buy S23. As per user experiences, S23 is a stable version and they have been loving it even after a year or more.
@@ameyaathale1224 In 2023, I didn't find the S23 interesting at all, but I was also happy with my S21 and had no thoughts about buying a new phone. Too bad you had to return your S24. I find it very disappointing to know that last year's phones are overall better than the Galaxy S24! Is it still worth buying a Galaxy S23 now? Could there be features with the S25, why do you regret buying an S23? 🤔🤯
@selim4955 Using wireless charging is good way to decrease wear of USB connector.
Though of course that isn't convenient on the move if battery doesn't last day and return to home.
@@selim4955 Did you mean 'why do you regret buying an S24?'. If yes, then obviously the Exynos CPU. I felt the CPU was getting warm too quickly. Battery used to drop all of a sudden during installations and continuous scrolling at 120 Hz. Also, there have been many instances with Exynos where people have found the phone to be getting extremely warm during summers. I felt like it's a risk having it in the long run so decided to send it back. What comes up with S25 will totally depend on how S24 (Exynos) performs for most of the users, depending on that Samsung might change something.
@@tuunaes wireless charging is not fast enough for me. I have a powerbank for charge with USB C cable or wireless.
Yass that Exyshit got exposed 🎉😂
Yes yes yes 😂 I wish that a big UA-camr would call for a boycott. 3 years ago there was a petition that I was very happy about. about how exynos sucks . I think that was one of the reasons that the s23 had Snapdragon and now this crap again 😢
Wow S24 SD is killing the competition
I wish you could run a full test from 100 to 0% on LTE without airplane mode and then run a test on WIFI without airplane mode from 100 to 0%?
I don't think Exynos is bad here. When you look at this test Exynos can easy last all day bateery and none of users will use phone this way, it's obviously test, right. But look this, SD 8 gen 3 is the best chipset on the market with apple, and Exynos is very close to being neck to neck. When we think about the last exynos and now Exynos it is a masive gap in quality.for daily use, none of us will notice these problems. Mostly people start complaining about Exynos because of you tube testings and itis OK because of youtubers most of this pones and better and better but i do agree for Exynos to be cheaper at least 150
Just buy the s23
They should keep exynos for the fe editions I think . I have the s23 fe exynos and its a beast of a phone
rewrite:
My gripe with Samsung is... If the Exynos chip is less powerful than the SD chip, the S24 with Exynos should be priced lower than the S24 SD.
покупаем S24 на снэпдрэгоне
This is so bad samsung can be allowed to do this for the same price..
Tanks MoBro 🫶🏼 I briefly thought about whether Samsung had made the s23 sd version worse with a software update, but I think my thought is nonsense. So you could say that Samsung has at least managed to improve the exynos version to the runtime of the s23 sd version🤔 right? Greetings from Germany
oh I forgot that the battery in the exynos is bigger 😂
Oh no Samsung. I'm sad. But I still want a Samsung mini from you with about 5" - 5.5" inches 😁
and here I am again.... I think that's exactly what Samsung wanted. not to have less endurance with s24 ex compared to s23 sd
....sehr guter test denke MoBro