Goldfish Gladiators: Punisher Burn (Standard, Arena)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 326

  • @isaacrobertson4374
    @isaacrobertson4374 6 років тому +116

    I feel that evolving wilds is much better than cinder barrens for two major reasons
    1. With a basic land from evolving wilds, it allows for dragonskull untapped next turn
    2. It also thins out the deck, this deck hates drawing lands later in the game so taking them out of the deck is very good

  • @meatrace
    @meatrace 6 років тому +54

    Electrostatic Field is such an MVP. I play UR counter-burn and there's nothing I want more in my opening hand. Comes down before counters are online, blocks almost everything up to 4 drops in the meta (other than green stompy), has 4 toughness so will often eat 2 removal spells, basically turns everything you have into a burn spell. Especially once you get 2-4 of them out it's like "shock you for 6".
    *skeet skeet skeet*

    • @cuddlequeen3225
      @cuddlequeen3225 6 років тому +1

      Seth was just saying it’s an MVP when I read this haha. I built a deck back in closed beta with Guttersnipe and the card from Amonket I think it was that has the same ability as Electrostatic Field. Field is better though cause the toughness. But with those two
      Cards you can burn your opponent out without ever having to attack.
      And Firebrand Archer was what I was talking about that I was using before.

  • @killerkurez9233
    @killerkurez9233 6 років тому +70

    Sov bite is more like a lightning helix isn't it?

    • @Small_Panda
      @Small_Panda 6 років тому +1

      YES!

    • @DiogoVKersting
      @DiogoVKersting 6 років тому +6

      Yeah, but it can't target creatures

    • @Small_Panda
      @Small_Panda 6 років тому +2

      Yeah but lava axe is 5 mana deal 5 damage to player that isn't even close at all. This at least is 3 dmg 3 heal 2 mana.

    • @DiogoVKersting
      @DiogoVKersting 6 років тому +6

      He said lava axe, but he meant lava spike (which also can only target players).

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +2

      Sort of, except you can't hit creatures.

  • @adamrambo5
    @adamrambo5 6 років тому +11

    Happy to see arena! Do some more of it. I've been into it a lot lately

  • @crimsonwolf3487
    @crimsonwolf3487 6 років тому +16

    Game 1 was totally your fault. Risk factor is an INSTANT. You cast it at sorcery speed and left up no removal and got run over by creatures.

  • @coreysierchio4650
    @coreysierchio4650 6 років тому +5

    You were rewarded for keeping a lot of 1 land hands. Glad to see a *budget* deck do so well. Thanks for the content.

  • @ODIRGO
    @ODIRGO 6 років тому +35

    And Seth mocked Risk Factor when it was first spoiled

    • @PovZ123
      @PovZ123 6 років тому

      Yeah, he is used to having punisher cards being bad.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +17

      Yeah, seems like there's a least one card each set that I completely underrate and live to regret.

    • @ecoKady
      @ecoKady 6 років тому +3

      @@MTGGoldfish Risk Factor is still not very good. It's legitimately good in one specific deck and okay in another deck. No one is looking at Curious Obsession and Tempest Djinn and calling them underrated. They're good in one deck and in that deck they're very good.

    • @zylaji
      @zylaji 6 років тому

      David Kadonsky There are way more ways to build hyper-agressive decks than there are to build Mono-U Tempo.

    • @ecoKady
      @ecoKady 6 років тому +2

      @@zylaji I'm not convinced Risk Factor is better than another threat in those hyper aggressive matches. Hyperaggresive decks lose an entire turn casting a 3 mana Risk Factor and then possibly spending another card and another turn to cast it again.
      We have Flame of Keld and Experimental Frenzy as solid aggressive red card advantage engines. It seems unlikely the winter set will come without a single playable red threat that won't be better in red decks than the 2 copies of Risk Factor they're running now.

  • @ErasMcras
    @ErasMcras 6 років тому +97

    "Sovereigns Bite is basically lava AXE. It's twice as much mana as lava AXE."

    • @DiogoVKersting
      @DiogoVKersting 6 років тому +9

      I'm still confused by what exactly he means by that.

    • @ErasMcras
      @ErasMcras 6 років тому +1

      I know what he meant.

    • @Small_Panda
      @Small_Panda 6 років тому +3

      This killed me so much as it was just SO WRONG lol.

    • @funkypants7297
      @funkypants7297 6 років тому +10

      10 mana sovereign’s bite but we can get away with it...

    • @ErasMcras
      @ErasMcras 6 років тому +2

      @@funkypants7297 not even sorins vengeance costs that much.

  • @Chultae
    @Chultae 6 років тому +3

    Seth, at 45:50 where you're like "oh we got punished by our sword point diplomacy" - The other way to look at it is that if you didn't have that card, you were drawing land for your next 3 turns, so technically it was a good card as it got you through the flood to your action.

  • @pablolins
    @pablolins 6 років тому +9

    Even if SPD hits 3 lands, it's 3 less lands you'll draw on the next turns, filtering your draws to come with more burns.

    • @sjbarnette2122
      @sjbarnette2122 6 років тому +2

      Pablo Lins my thought exactly. That's three lands your not drawing. I know that there isn't any burn for three mana. But that seems better than three turns drawing lands in a burn deck. I want to make a modern version.

    • @pablolins
      @pablolins 6 років тому +2

      Aaaand Lands aways fuel your Risk Factor jump start. A modern version looks fine too.

  • @brendanerickson2363
    @brendanerickson2363 6 років тому +3

    What an awesome deck! Haven't been on the edge of my seat like that in a while!

  • @kithkindeck
    @kithkindeck 6 років тому

    Watching you keep one landers and drawing out of it like a true magic champion is one of the most frustrating and entertaining things I've ever seen. Keep up the good work, my dude.

  • @ethandenson7182
    @ethandenson7182 6 років тому +68

    Want more arena... I’m a sad boy but i get the rationale

    • @noobassscrub-ass354
      @noobassscrub-ass354 6 років тому +3

      Pls no

    • @andyspendlove1019
      @andyspendlove1019 6 років тому +28

      Yes please. Arena is fantastic.

    • @ladycthuwu
      @ladycthuwu 6 років тому +14

      I have 0 idea why people prefer MTGO for standard. I won't watch matches when he is playing on MTGO because for someone who is unfamiliar with the UI it is so hard to follow what is going on.

    • @thatonespecificmoose5863
      @thatonespecificmoose5863 6 років тому +7

      the meta on mtga is super skewed because of the free to play model

    • @totallynotthecia
      @totallynotthecia 6 років тому +4

      I like arena as well but I do agree budget doesn't make sense b/c budget is built around dollar cost which has no bearing on arena since you can't buy cards directly (individually)

  • @cuddlequeen3225
    @cuddlequeen3225 6 років тому +3

    Best way to say it is Sovereign’s Bite is a Sorcery speed, face-only Lightning Helix. More words but more accurate. :-)

    • @qwormuli77
      @qwormuli77 6 років тому

      Black Lighting Spike.

  • @jvk4455
    @jvk4455 6 років тому +12

    Hey Seth, Ive been playing that standard dredge deck like non stop since you posted it and Ive been getting some GNARLY results. Do you think it could be a tiered deck?

    • @ecoKady
      @ecoKady 6 років тому

      There are so many scary Tier 2 decks, that I don't know you need to worry about a tier deck. If you know your deck and it's playing powerful cards, it's viable. You're going to do better with a deck you love and understand than someone that just picked up Boros midrange or Golgari midrange last week.
      If you're having fun, keep playing the deck!

    • @jollyreaper7914
      @jollyreaper7914 6 років тому

      I play the standard dredge a little different. But his dredge would probably be a bit more consistent. I run doom whisperers enhanced surveillance and stitchers supplier to turbo thru everything

  • @Leviathan62089
    @Leviathan62089 5 років тому +1

    This deck is really awesome in best of one! It has taken me from Bronze T4 all the way up to Gold T3 in one evening. The only changes I made to it was I replaced the tap lands for shock lands and took out one of the sword-point diplomacy for a basic swamp.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Awesome! The deck does work really well in best of one, and it's cheap.

  • @PovZ123
    @PovZ123 6 років тому +3

    Ugh this deck is so sweet against non-control decks. Just everything resolving to their face. I can't wait to play this again this weekend.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      We even managed to beat the control decks!

    • @PovZ123
      @PovZ123 6 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish I beat jeskai 2-1, but esper got me 2-1 though

  • @TheFlamespriest
    @TheFlamespriest 6 років тому +1

    I got crushed by this deck last night while playing grixis dragons. Was 4-0, saw punisher burn match 5, and was just thinking "Is this a real deck?" Proceeded to get destroyed 2-0. Seems legitimately really good. Would not be at all surprised if we see a lot of it in the coming pro tour.

  • @KDiaz-hy1xx
    @KDiaz-hy1xx 6 років тому +8

    Oh, no! I’ve been playing this for a week now. This will likely shift the meta.

    • @jacefairis1289
      @jacefairis1289 6 років тому

      I've been trying to think of the best way to do this too -- I knew 4x Sovereign's Bite and 4x Risk Factor were good, but there were a few card choices I didn't like. I'm gonna start playing Electrostatic Field over Runaway Steam-Kin tbh

  • @victorappleton1906
    @victorappleton1906 6 років тому

    Thanks for putting Arena in the title. Helps set expectations.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Yeah, that's the plan for Standard videos moving forward.

  • @ZackSavage
    @ZackSavage 6 років тому +17

    Man I hope rakdos has a punish theme

    • @BuckysKnifeFlip
      @BuckysKnifeFlip 6 років тому +1

      I want the keyword to be something involving hedonism since I feel it would fit them so well. Maybe an ability that triggers off life lost.

    • @ZackSavage
      @ZackSavage 6 років тому +1

      @@BuckysKnifeFlip like your opponent can sacrifice x permanents to counter this spell

    • @kronksstronkstonks6360
      @kronksstronkstonks6360 6 років тому

      Seems a bit painful to sac multiple permas for a single card. 'pay X life to counter this card' would be sweet af for burn though - and will give us Grixis players a hefty stiffy ;)

  • @gingerkid427
    @gingerkid427 6 років тому +20

    Game 1: Spends two minutes in total shock that his mono red opponent top decked 2 damage for exactly lethal
    Game 2: Top decks 2 damage for exactly lethal, basically says "neat"
    ???

    • @ahunter7563
      @ahunter7563 6 років тому +2

      he was already in such a good position with 2 risk factor in gy,,,

  • @prufrock1977
    @prufrock1977 6 років тому +1

    This deck just warms the cockles of my heart!

  • @alexandercato7400
    @alexandercato7400 6 років тому

    Really enjoying these arena videos!

  • @trysephiroth007
    @trysephiroth007 6 років тому +37

    Have you considered doing a pole on Arena vs MtGO? I know the comments on Arena videos are a bunch of people complaining but people are more vocal when they don't like something.

    • @Atmapalazzo
      @Atmapalazzo 6 років тому +3

      I mean I fail to see why the current compromise is an issue at all.

    • @Moonlit_sky_with_stars
      @Moonlit_sky_with_stars 6 років тому +12

      Ever since they streamlined arena, I tend to enjoy it more than moto

    • @Fly-ik6kg
      @Fly-ik6kg 6 років тому

      Yeah a pole on youtube would be nice

    • @johnnyandthepnuemoni
      @johnnyandthepnuemoni 6 років тому

      Pole.... Thank you American education system.

    • @Fly-ik6kg
      @Fly-ik6kg 6 років тому +6

      @@johnnyandthepnuemoni im from austria so mistakes can happen. Honestly i dont give a fuck

  • @petefry82
    @petefry82 6 років тому

    That last game was soooooo close. Well played!

  • @Crisper333
    @Crisper333 6 років тому

    This deck is so much fun to play! I won 9 out of 11 games in Arena last night. I'm definitely building this in paper, lol. 🔥🔥🔥

  • @andrewgolubiewski3463
    @andrewgolubiewski3463 6 років тому

    Huh, I ran a version of this today before seeing this. Definitely going to update to your list, more streamlined than what I put together.

  • @lizardoo8632
    @lizardoo8632 6 років тому +13

    First game: 8:58

  • @DonovanPresents
    @DonovanPresents 6 років тому

    Have you tried Tomb Robber in this deck? It could definitely help filter through all unnecessary land draws when Diplomacy gets cast.

  • @true_plays_games
    @true_plays_games 6 років тому +1

    LOL what a spanking! Nice job.
    By the way you had lethal at 1:00 when you passed haha.

  • @CoL_Drake
    @CoL_Drake 6 років тому +13

    Want more arena

  • @alessandroverrecchia5763
    @alessandroverrecchia5763 6 років тому +2

    Except againts golgari explore, this deck ROOLS

  • @Peachrocks5
    @Peachrocks5 6 років тому

    I did this with Jaya Ballard because I wanted to find a home for her, I named the deck Jayas Diplomacy. Only ran 6 creatures, 4 electrostatic, 2 guttersnipe. More burn spells. Especially Banefire. That can’t be countered deal especially when coming off Jayas three mana makes the opponent not commit to countering the first spell say a bite or lightning strike, trying to deal with the more deadly second they know is coming only to find out they can’t counter it. It’s delicious.

  • @infumiinations1311
    @infumiinations1311 6 років тому +17

    I made this and named it risky diplomacy

  • @lotleo987
    @lotleo987 6 років тому

    Sword point getting 3 mana out of the way is super powerful. Most burn decks spend the next 3 turns with the opponent at 7 life just waiting. That keeps tempo. And its a fine discard for risk factor.

  • @R1S3_0F_D3ATH
    @R1S3_0F_D3ATH 6 років тому +1

    Let's see a modern version, looks spicy AF

  • @cuddlequeen3225
    @cuddlequeen3225 6 років тому

    I love your nicknames for the cards. Whirley Boi and Steamy.

  • @JoshuaSAlt31
    @JoshuaSAlt31 6 років тому

    I am taking it to FNM tonight ;)...I am wondering if I should just play this version or should I play my version with more hand disruption and Guttersnipes.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Do whatever you're most comfortable with, I'm sure it will be fun either way.

  • @VatisInsania
    @VatisInsania 6 років тому +3

    36:23 discord ping GOT ME
    UGHHHH
    sweet deck tho, pretty budget too

  • @brandonr.2807
    @brandonr.2807 3 роки тому

    This deck handles itself surprisingly well in historic with just a few upgrades...2021

  • @ThunderBirdJack
    @ThunderBirdJack 6 років тому

    Yoooooo I was playing this deck in DOM standard with Guttersnipe! This version works better tho. Is 8 wizards enough tho? I had two copies of Dismissive Pyromancer as a way to draw and turn on bolt

  • @nomak38416
    @nomak38416 6 років тому

    I've always loved Sword-Point Diplomacy

  • @anonymoususer69
    @anonymoususer69 6 років тому +5

    I haven’t been following magic recently; Does Arena have all the cards in standard?

    • @lucasenraraujo
      @lucasenraraujo 6 років тому +8

      yup. Arena even got Guilds of Ravnica earlier than MTGO if I'm not mistaken.

    • @christopherwoodbury7520
      @christopherwoodbury7520 6 років тому +3

      And bonus extra cards exclusive to arena (but completely unplayable)

    • @GaleeStorm
      @GaleeStorm 6 років тому +1

      Yes, full standard plus some cards they made for the tutorial

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +3

      It does!

  • @mtgfoilcommander6338
    @mtgfoilcommander6338 6 років тому

    This is actually my standard deck, already been playing it.

  • @ItsDKoda
    @ItsDKoda 6 років тому +1

    Thank God for Arena

  • @obesechicken13
    @obesechicken13 6 років тому

    I still haven't picked up my jaw from the ground after watching this!

  • @BeezKneezStream
    @BeezKneezStream 6 років тому +4

    I was wondering why you'd run cinder barrens instead of evolving wilds. Aside from scary one land hands they also synergize better with Dragonskull summit.

  • @goodshipzion
    @goodshipzion 6 років тому

    45:18: better than drawing 3 lands in a row, for the next 3 turns. Plus, it gives you lands to pitch to Risk Factor later on.

  • @jesselaplante1040
    @jesselaplante1040 6 років тому

    Idea for a card:
    Electromagnetic Pulse XRU
    Instant
    Put a Short counter on X+1 target Creatures and/or Artifacts your opponents control.
    Permanents w/ Short counter cannot attack,block and triggered and activated abilities will not trigger.
    ETBs won't trigger until the beginning of your next upkeep.
    At the beginning of you next upkeep, remove all Short counters.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому +1

      Hmm, that's an interesting card!

  • @christopherwoodbury7520
    @christopherwoodbury7520 6 років тому +2

    Well... time to add unmoored ego to my sideboard since this deck will be all over arena next week.

  • @nikhilrajendram2612
    @nikhilrajendram2612 6 років тому +1

    Would've swapped the cinder barrens for evolving wilds, if you're having to play a tapped land. then having evolving wilds means you have less chance of hitting lands with diplomacy or factor later in the game.

  • @mark3561982
    @mark3561982 6 років тому

    As I sit here and I know you're streaming now but I really love this Punisher burn day the dent works out really well I have not taken to any tournament yet what I plan on doing it after I get the last two Planeswalkers I need for the deck. But I was sitting here thinking what would you do with the same exact that but take it to Modern switch up some of the creatures and the instances in the deck what would that look like sorry I can't support you on Twitch but I do watch in I do like watching your videos on UA-cam

  • @ravensman49
    @ravensman49 6 років тому

    Curious as to what the midrange matchup looks like. Sultai and Folgari feel like they might be difficult but not unwinnable.

  • @alexnas9634
    @alexnas9634 6 років тому +1

    hey Seth (or anyone) i dont have a vault meter but i noticed on your last Arena you did, is there a vault meter? i have checked and i dont have that meter

    • @lucasenraraujo
      @lucasenraraujo 6 років тому +3

      The vault only shows up if it's over 100%. You can manually check the log file in the program folder or install mtgarena.pro (a neat companion app that is very lightweight and only reads and uploads info from the Arena log so that you can track it).
      Prior to the July update (and back in closed beta) we had the vault displayed at all times and people started complaining how slow the progress was, so they decided to hide it until they changed the progress rate (which hasn't been touched as of yet)

  • @loni3411
    @loni3411 6 років тому +1

    Thank you for showing arena in the title!

  • @Funkytrip73
    @Funkytrip73 6 років тому

    Would this deck be modern viable with 4 guttersnipes and 4 vexing devils?

  • @michaelschick3820
    @michaelschick3820 6 років тому +2

    Can we get an expencive punisher fire list?

  • @QuestionMarc
    @QuestionMarc 6 років тому +1

    He never played against what should be his weakest matchup: Green Stompy! What does this do about Nullhide Ferox or Ghalta? Should we get Cast Down or Vraska's Contempt?

    • @ChaseSpec
      @ChaseSpec 6 років тому

      You are 💯 correct. That match up is atrocious. I play with a similar 75 but have 3 contempts in my sb just for that matchup. It's still rough.. Without them I was 1/11 and with I'm 6/10 atm. Having said all that, I did not see a single stompy list in about 4 hours of play tdy so the meta may be shifting.

    • @ruudvanlaarhoven5776
      @ruudvanlaarhoven5776 6 років тому

      I'd say, get Price of Fame, it kills all the problematic legends for cheap (Ghalta, Aurelia, Lyra, Shalai)

  • @jader3193
    @jader3193 6 років тому

    how is the vault progress visible here? is it a hidden setting or just something they've removed?

  • @stoneman289
    @stoneman289 6 років тому

    45:45 I find it interesting that Seth blames the sword-point for the three lands, when if he hadn't cast that card, he would probably have lost anyway with 3 land draws in a row.

  • @tijonse
    @tijonse 6 років тому

    Hmm I like the idea, but Sword-Point Diplomacy has a math problem... Opponents should always give us most of the cards, burn spells do 2-3dmg, why should he take fixed 3 dmg by exile them when he can let us pay mana for them? (exception, create cards, risk factor and burn spells > 3 dmg).

  • @BenDy3223
    @BenDy3223 6 років тому

    Wow, this deck is bananas good!

  • @deathpenguinjoe3644
    @deathpenguinjoe3644 6 років тому

    That second rounds first game took longer than it needed to he had sov's bite, shock, and lightning. Any two would be more than 4 and when tefari was resolving there was only 3 mana up, enough for 1 counter

  • @coremagnumplays4684
    @coremagnumplays4684 6 років тому +2

    looking forward to modern mardu burn with 8 lightning helices

  • @skynight113
    @skynight113 6 років тому +1

    Brow beat, bookburning and the like would be the orginals

  • @saw31489
    @saw31489 6 років тому

    Not gonna lie, I've always wanted to try and make a Rakdos punisher deck in modern. Black even has a counterspell burn. Since Seth tried this deck I'm actually going to send it and see what happens.

  • @golengrundy6283
    @golengrundy6283 6 років тому

    Seth, Are you playing at the GP in New Jersey?

  • @jonathanperigo6853
    @jonathanperigo6853 6 років тому

    At 24:35 you had lethal already. When he goes to cast teferi you attempt to burn with your spells, he counters one, takes the other, then doesn't have enough Mana for any other counters on your main when you sovereigns bite. (They don't play main deck negate)

  • @jacobpilackas4571
    @jacobpilackas4571 6 років тому

    Playing this build with experimental frenzy in the sideboard for control is pretty quacktastic.

  • @djredvillain3139
    @djredvillain3139 6 років тому

    Would you play this at gp

  • @raulpacheco7488
    @raulpacheco7488 6 років тому

    Now this is what Risk Factor is for!

  • @fedaykinfletcher1322
    @fedaykinfletcher1322 6 років тому

    I am curious why u have the vault in your game i havent seen that in ages

  • @lucasenraraujo
    @lucasenraraujo 6 років тому

    There's a small white line under Seth's username (probably another program that got caught in the screen capture) and it bothered me a bit too much hahaha :x. The deck seems.... fine? I think I've faced better Risk Factor decks than this, but I'm very curious to see where the standard metagame will end up since so many different builds seem viable(ish).

  • @samhalsey2155
    @samhalsey2155 6 років тому

    Why not run evolving wilds over cinder Barren? The land is coming in tapped anyway so why not have a choice in what you get and include a little bit of deck thinning while you’re at it

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      If the land is going to come into play tapped anyway we might as well have access to both colors instead of just one (unless we're a three color deck, then Evolving Wilds becomes more appealing).

  • @sirkickassalot123
    @sirkickassalot123 6 років тому

    whee.. I am almost playing the exact same deck when watching

  • @MrBrandyng
    @MrBrandyng 6 років тому

    Edge of the seat at the end there gd, good show super nice 5-0

  • @spice_krispies
    @spice_krispies 6 років тому

    I feel Tattered Mummy needs to be in this deck. Its like a reverse Pyromancer, and a body that stalls and buys you time. Damage on a stick is never a bad thing. Also, no Guttersnipe in here? Wow....

    • @chuksieabani1856
      @chuksieabani1856 6 років тому

      Gutersnipe costs 3 mana, is a bad blocker and dies very very easily at 2 toughness. I have never had guttersnipe survive until my turn whenever I play it.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      Hmm, Tattered Mummy could be sweet. As for Guttersnipe, I think Electrostatic Field is mostly a better version (even though it deals damage) because it actually lives sometimes.

  • @SiraZero
    @SiraZero 6 років тому

    For control match up, why not just 3 duress to fight the counter spells?

    • @kithkindeck
      @kithkindeck 6 років тому

      Duress isn't burn. Your deck is a very linear strategy. Every single card is damage. The plan is to overload the counterspells. This is why I think angrath is very loose. SOmething like inescapable blaze would be way better here.

  • @garmatey3816
    @garmatey3816 6 років тому

    Sword-point is so so so good in this deck

  • @ecoKady
    @ecoKady 6 років тому

    That feeling when you're browsing Scryfall and you're seriously wondering if Precision Bolt is better than Lava Coil.

  • @skullblaster9909
    @skullblaster9909 6 років тому

    I literally just made this deck on Arena, crazy stuff.

  • @arragoth
    @arragoth 6 років тому

    This was basically my Standard Deck leading into Ravnica but with Guttersnipe and Soul Scar Mages.

    • @PovZ123
      @PovZ123 6 років тому +1

      Snipe needs to be replaced with Field. Better pinger.

  • @andrew6233
    @andrew6233 6 років тому +1

    This seems like the deck where jaya Ballard might actually fit in the sideboard, possibly over angrath. She lets you replace any lands from sword point and risk factor, or just instantly cast a risk factor the same turn you play her. If she gets to ult you have all of your burn spells all over again, game over for any control deck.

  • @germanyjones2700
    @germanyjones2700 6 років тому

    This deck is legit I’ve been attempting to play this build since pyromancer came out (soul scar mage was so good so hood could deal 9 on turn 2 with two wizlight) but it’s been made legit with risk factor. Too bad claim // fame is no longer legal :( it was so good with pyromancer.

  • @PleebsOG
    @PleebsOG 6 років тому +1

    Dang it Saffron. I've been playing a similar deck for WEEKS! Now everyone knows my secret. Hahaha

  • @Blackmystix
    @Blackmystix 6 років тому

    Dude I've been wanting to make this deck. I had the idea for it like a few days ago

  • @richardbritton4675
    @richardbritton4675 6 років тому +1

    Modern version
    4 risk factor
    4vexing Devil
    4 lightning bolt
    4 rift bolt
    4 banfire
    4 steamkin
    4 lightning strike
    4 lava coil
    4 ritual
    4 mana monkey

    • @richardbritton4675
      @richardbritton4675 6 років тому

      That new red enchantment needs to replace one copy of 4 of these

    • @kithkindeck
      @kithkindeck 6 років тому

      MIght want claim /// fame for vexing devil and stea kins.

    • @reye_bruh
      @reye_bruh 6 років тому

      There is some problems, I don't see any boros charms and lightning helix here ;)
      In all seriousness dou, risk factor is too slow, just put in lava spikes and swiftspears. 3 Mana is too much for modern. And also, semian spirit is not needed, burn In modern runs like 19 lands anyway

    • @reye_bruh
      @reye_bruh 6 років тому

      @@kithkindeck YES I see the magic aids insperation lol

    • @sensei9767
      @sensei9767 6 років тому

      lava coil is not a card you can play in modern, the rituals are bad, since they won't accelerate you into anything that can make a big enough impact to compensate for it.

  • @zacklapierre7065
    @zacklapierre7065 5 років тому

    How is 100 bucks budget

  • @nils3939
    @nils3939 6 років тому

    I've been trying to make risk factor/ sword-point diplomacy work since risk factor was spoiled but my lists were never solid enough

  • @luliby2309
    @luliby2309 6 років тому

    Nice. Risk Factor feels like a fixed Browbeat to me. Casting it twice makes it much more worth it. Kinda how Torment Of Hailfire fixes the same problem by repeating a bunch of times. Maybe this is how to make punishers good?
    Oh and that's a shame to hear about the formats for playing Budget Magic/etc...Arena really ought to be blended in with the rest of the ways of playing Magic. We really should make use of the good new client and the arguments against using it were so weak.

  • @plainbrad
    @plainbrad 6 років тому +1

    I've been playing this deck and have had issues vs control. Maybe I'm playing wrong but it's a sweeeet deck. Just not having fun vs control.

    • @PovZ123
      @PovZ123 6 років тому

      Esper won be over 2-1 and I beat jeskai 2-1 last saturday standard showdown at my LGS.

    • @sethchapman1425
      @sethchapman1425 6 років тому

      You will have to against control be a bit more contrilie. Like he did with white blue. Opponent did not want to play anything for fear of not being able to counter. Allowing Seth to build up to work through counters.

    • @ladycthuwu
      @ladycthuwu 6 років тому +1

      "Just not having fun vs control."
      Standard in a nutshell IMO. Control right now is just super unfun to play against. It doesn't even feel like Magic. The non-control player basically gets to sit there and do nothing waiting for the control player to combo off or whatever their wincon happens to be.

    • @sethchapman1425
      @sethchapman1425 6 років тому

      @@ladycthuwu oh you are right control is a bitch. I play it. I know the other side of the table is frustrated.

  • @___ooobodybagooo___
    @___ooobodybagooo___ 6 років тому +23

    Angrath.... I forgot about everyone's fav cow boi

    • @cicjose6016
      @cicjose6016 6 років тому +1

      there is NOTHING bad about Angrath and wins games by himself

    • @totallynotthecia
      @totallynotthecia 6 років тому

      Yew haw

    • @Crisper333
      @Crisper333 6 років тому +1

      I Play this deck on Arena, Bo1 format and main deck Angrath. NO one expects to see a Plainswalker in this deck, much less Angrath.

    • @kronksstronkstonks6360
      @kronksstronkstonks6360 6 років тому

      I love the idea of an Angrath, The Flame-chained deck that abuses Fell Specters and Raiders wakes but lack the know-how to pull it off.
      Angrath is my boi tho

  • @ToxicallyMasculinelol
    @ToxicallyMasculinelol 6 років тому

    swordpoint diplomacy, SWIIMMGG

  • @Skibby22
    @Skibby22 6 років тому

    Why no Guttersnipe?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 років тому

      I've found that Guttersnipe just dies to easily to really be effective (especially for three mana).

    • @Skibby22
      @Skibby22 6 років тому

      Fair

  • @jollyreaper7914
    @jollyreaper7914 6 років тому

    I built this without angrath and ritual of soot for control 4 banefires 3 fight with fire and 2 tormenting voice
    Went 4-0 at a local store
    I also played 1 more swamp bc i kept flooding more red than i wanted

  • @sloth9669
    @sloth9669 6 років тому +3

    Why no guttersnipe?

    • @boredsak
      @boredsak 6 років тому +6

      3 drop, dies to shock, wizards lightning and lightning strike. Not the greatest blocker either

    • @sethchapman1425
      @sethchapman1425 6 років тому +2

      Not needed with what this deck is doing.

    • @ladycthuwu
      @ladycthuwu 6 років тому +2

      Too much downside and not enough upside. 2 toughness on a 3 drop is just weak. If it were a Goblin Wizard instead of a Goblin Shaman I could see it being more useful for immediate value. If it were a Wizard, you could turn 4 drop Guttersnipe + Wizard's Lightning for 5 damage, which wouldn't be bad. But, as of now, best you can do is turn 4 Guttersnipe + Shock, which is no better than just shocking twice for the same mana.
      I've tried Guttersnipe in a few decks and have honestly found its greatest weakness is that it isn't a Wizard and dies to anything. If either of those were changed, it would be a much better card.

    • @codycosman8271
      @codycosman8271 6 років тому

      Electrostatic shock also covers his place.

  • @JurinoJr
    @JurinoJr 6 років тому

    I wonder how the match up against golgari is

  • @gootvansquid
    @gootvansquid 6 років тому

    in Arena, what the heck is that treasure chest icon on the home screen, and why do i not have that? lol

  • @jma3554
    @jma3554 6 років тому

    I prefer to think of sovereign bite as a sorcery version of lightning helix