This AI changes EVERYTHING (ChatGPT x Blender)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 579

  • @PixelwolfOG
    @PixelwolfOG Рік тому +90

    I have extensively tested this and while yes it has potential it also has some serious limitations (for now) on prime example being a lot of the scripts won't work simply because the dataset ChatGpt uses ends in 2021. A lot of the python calls have changed in that time so you will get a number of errors.

    • @FirstLast-jc9fb
      @FirstLast-jc9fb Рік тому +7

      I've gotten in the habbit of telling it to check for errors a few times after writing any script and have had some good results. But you aren't wrong

    • @ferdacoin2727
      @ferdacoin2727 Рік тому

      have it query a live api

    • @dissonanceparadiddle
      @dissonanceparadiddle Рік тому

      ​@@ferdacoin2727 can it do that?!

    • @nekrugderzweite8298
      @nekrugderzweite8298 Рік тому

      ​@@dissonanceparadiddle no i dont think

    • @fortknightpredilluvian2008
      @fortknightpredilluvian2008 Рік тому +3

      if you add the DAN " Do Anything Now" script it will reveal chatgpt is connected to the internet and the database has been updated in secret. then you can unlock more potential out of scripting when its limits are released

  • @blenderpanzi
    @blenderpanzi Рік тому +84

    As I said somewhere else: Only run these scripts once you read them and understood them. Blender Python scripts can access your hard disk and do anything to it. E.g. delete everything. Verify that it is not some garbage code that accidentally destroys stuff.
    Also I guess the last line of the script that failed should be:
    for material in materials:
    bpy.data.materials.remove(material)

    • @blenderpanzi
      @blenderpanzi Рік тому +2

      @lucian6172 I don't mean that Blender is doing something bad, I mean that I don't trust the output of such AIs to actually only do what you asked it to do every time. I'd say only use that stuff as a better auto-complete if you're a software developer.

    • @dragonslayergoblineater9048
      @dragonslayergoblineater9048 Рік тому +1

      no

    • @hipjoeroflmto4764
      @hipjoeroflmto4764 Рік тому +1

      No

    • @hipjoeroflmto4764
      @hipjoeroflmto4764 Рік тому

      @lucian6172 ur comment was deleted might want to repost it I can only see ur other one in the section but on notifications u have a reply that never made it to the section unless you are cringe and deleted it

  • @SupahLuke
    @SupahLuke Рік тому +346

    I love ChatGPT, I've been using it as debugger when I am stuck on a code problem and it's very powerful how quickly it can find the problems. A few tips if you want good responses from ChatGPT:
    If the response isn't what you're looking for you can just try to regenerate the answer sometimes it'll fix itself
    Another thing you can do is tell it why the response it gave isn't what you're looking for, it'll sometimes recognize its past mistakes and fix them.
    Another thing that happens quite often is that ChatGPT randomly cuts off its response. If you simply give "continue" as the next prompt it usually continues where it left off.
    Overall it's way more powerful than I had originally anticipated and I can definitely see Chat AIs like this to replace search engines in the future.
    Anyways, great video! I love this use case for ChatGPT

    • @StrayCreations
      @StrayCreations  Рік тому +15

      These are some great additional tips! Thank you :)

    • @Baleur
      @Baleur Рік тому +9

      I've already used it to help me figure out what node setup to use in Unreal Engine to make certain game mechanics work. As you said, if it didnt work the first time, TELL IT WHY, and it'll try to change the solution.

    • @milandjukic4583
      @milandjukic4583 Рік тому +1

      too bad they nerfed it for like 60% of content. i am waiting for somebody to make open source version

    • @irql2
      @irql2 Рік тому +4

      @@milandjukic4583 nerfed it how? I've seen some of the changes but dont know which would be considered 'nerfs'

    • @jorgin10ful
      @jorgin10ful Рік тому +1

      any tips for the cut off? x_x (it cuts off most of the time, if I write "continue" to it, "continue where you left off", the AI ​​does the same thing again from the beginning and if it's code I have to wait for it to finish so it shows me cut off, ah)

  • @senchaholic
    @senchaholic Рік тому +31

    You don't have to write "write a python script" and other stuff several times. It would've been enough to say "now write one with" or even just the "circular array instead" part. That's one of the big things, you don't have to repeat yourself, it understands context.

  • @JoshFlorii
    @JoshFlorii Рік тому +56

    I've been following neural networks for years and it's insane to finally see this artistic integration. This is such a game changer

    • @thomashauer6804
      @thomashauer6804 Рік тому +3

      its so insane...I asked for the difference between an evolutionary algorithm and a generative adversial networks and it explained it perfectly (including the similarities).which is kind of meta bc it partly has to reflect on itself
      its so cool and creepy at the same time..the leap from GPT3 to this is giant...the decent essays from certain literature-texts were already there with gpt3..but now you can choose any topics from STEM to history...the next leap will be probably even bigger if its like moores law or some exponential curve...and then singularity?

    • @emeraldstar45138
      @emeraldstar45138 Рік тому +1

      Exponential calculative growth. We should - hold on, we should ASK this bot about how to make quantum computing a thing. LOL

  • @StrayCreations
    @StrayCreations  Рік тому +73

    Hello everyone, I've just created a part 2 where I go way more in depth on troubleshooting ChatGPT and what to do when your script doesn't work. :)

    • @ottonormalverbraucher9679
      @ottonormalverbraucher9679 Рік тому

      Btw it's called Mandelbrot, not mandlebrot ;)

    • @ogre1890
      @ogre1890 Рік тому

      I’m glad you’ve done this because I’ve been trying this since the release of ChatGPT and almost always the scripts it generates don’t work. Thank you

    • @McCucumber
      @McCucumber Рік тому +1

      This software is pretty incredible. I had it write a speech for me to read at a town hall meeting. I posted it to the community tab on my page. I also tried some other things. I asked it if it could write code for a bot that responds to every mention of the word "mccucumber" on twitter and it said "sure" and wrote up the code and instructed me how to use it. Crazy.

    • @1NazareeM618
      @1NazareeM618 Рік тому

      Ai can never have the imagination of a bio entity imo ,we need a.i but a.i will always need us for when they want our brain it cannot because every atom of our body once belonged to a star " the stars died sowe could be born and then we created a.i to colonize the galaxy ,again

    • @kpw84u2
      @kpw84u2 Рік тому

      Is there a link to it?

  • @PeterHertel
    @PeterHertel Рік тому +190

    The fractal at 10:30 looks like the julia fractals we used to make with POV-Ray back in the day. It can be described as a 3D slice/shadow of a 4D object. Cool stuff :)

    • @cybrisRS
      @cybrisRS Рік тому +10

      Yup, looks like a quaternion julia set/fractal from what I find in google images.

    • @flyingjudgement
      @flyingjudgement Рік тому +5

      OMG thans a lot ! Im building a game related with Hyperdimensional spaces and had this dream how the conroll room will look like and cant find the name of it. BoooM its an actual 4D fractal set What The Actual F ! ! !
      I drawn it and trying to model it but i Know it will look better Proceduralised Now I can Make it Yuhey
      How our brain works is a misstery for me.

    • @flyingjudgement
      @flyingjudgement Рік тому

      @@fabianeer41 Thak you this is so usefull deffinitely going to speed up things. So exited to make this.

    • @monstrositylabs
      @monstrositylabs Рік тому

      @@maxmugen88 POV Ray. I'd forgotten about that too. I had it for the Atari ST

    • @gtziavelis
      @gtziavelis Рік тому +3

      a.k.a. a Lyapunov fractal

  • @lyonardo6700
    @lyonardo6700 Рік тому +17

    quick tip: you can tell the AI what went wrong in Blender (copy the Error message from the console) and then the AI will change the code

  • @mrmonay
    @mrmonay Рік тому +2

    5:40 -- You can also paste or even basically describe the error you got in GPT and it'll try to recode or fix the problem or at least explain what's going on ... super helpful.

  • @21EC
    @21EC Рік тому +7

    OMG ! it even knows how to create scripts in MaxScript (3dsMax's native scripting language which I used to use for years), that's beyond impressive !

  • @Andymac1701A
    @Andymac1701A Рік тому +1

    Interesting video. I tried Blender about twelve years ago. I did not have the time or motivation to press forward with learning any more.
    This illustrates that ChatGPT is a good learning tool for the casual user. Many thanks.

  • @HISEROD
    @HISEROD Рік тому +4

    I've tried out having chatGPT write scripts for me and I'd say that the most useful thing for getting good results is to know how to code. That way you can often fix mistakes that it makes yourself if it doesn't know where it went wrong.

    • @TheIgnoramus
      @TheIgnoramus Рік тому

      This is thing I’ve been trying to get in peoples heads, which your example is perfect. This won’t replace us (in the short term) but it will kick out low skill labor.

  • @fikr1234
    @fikr1234 Рік тому +12

    the fractal at 10:50 first reminded me of "burning ship" but after some googling, it looks to probably be a "quaternion Julia set"

  • @mjodr
    @mjodr Рік тому

    This is the best use of "AI" I have seen so far. This is awesome.

  • @lonergothonline
    @lonergothonline Рік тому +21

    part of the issue is that, like with the stability diffusion image generation, chatgpt in its current form lacks focus, or specialization. So, for programming, or medical or even sci fi lore, you'll have to wait for custom trained models that can take advantage of chatGPT's current knowledge base and refine it with new keywords and information, then this new data on top of what is currently available will need training by humans to get a more accurate response to what the humans actually want out of it. this 'new data' and 'new training' will hopefully be handled by smaller companies with a focus on one specific area of expertise, if for no other reason than to cut down on tech support calls by some significant percentile. so a team of smart people with lots of access to lots of hardware.
    in the future you'd want a user generated tool similar to chatGPT, which was made specifically to cater to the blender audience, which may include information and training that goes beyond simple scripting.

    • @failureforbeginners10
      @failureforbeginners10 Рік тому +2

      And eventually merge all of them into an absolute titan of knowledge able to pick between different "personalities" to fit the given context.

    • @daton3630
      @daton3630 Рік тому +1

      @@failureforbeginners10 that's literally what chatgpt is lmao

    • @Ifeelmylegssubtely
      @Ifeelmylegssubtely Рік тому +1

      The whole point is to be able to recognize you are using blender and use its trained data to specify an output for that you don't need another tool specifically for the blender audience. It will gradually improve also you have to be giving more specific prompts if you want more specific results.

  • @basilcmr
    @basilcmr Рік тому +1

    you don't have to ask "write a python script for blender" in every ask. once you ask, it knows what you are trying o do from previous chats. just ask "write another one for........." or "write code for", and if you generate 2 or 3 codes, you dont even have asked those just "what about....... this", "now.... this", "and......this" will do... just like a human understanding. that is the beauty of chat gpt

  • @VaibhavShewale
    @VaibhavShewale Рік тому +2

    by the way you din't need to write blender in chat again and again, cause after one time it retains earlier chats so you can directly move on to exact thing that you wanna ask!

  • @pvpworld
    @pvpworld Рік тому +49

    One thing i haven't seen people mention is that you can actually give the bot any type of code, it will read it and explain what it does, then hold onto it. Then you can ask it to add features to that code, like if you have some software you want to add features to but don't know how, it can do it for you.. its so damn useful and also scary because it knows languages that it shouldn't know like pawn (amxx) which is a very uncommon and old language for the original half-life game engine.. its remarkable what it knows

    • @Yukiixs
      @Yukiixs Рік тому +2

      Yea I had to learn « Maude » a very niche language for problem verification, and it hasnt any documentation aside from the official one, but chatgpt still recognized it and gave me very accurate examples and explaination. I could even ask it about the difference between this and another more popular langage i know and it was able to explain

    • @GarethDavidson
      @GarethDavidson Рік тому +2

      You can also get it to convert between languages, which is why it can program in obscure languages. It makes off-by-one errors and when it's wrong it's confidently wrong though.

    • @thomashauer6804
      @thomashauer6804 Рік тому

      does this mean i never have to learn pyhton fully? that would be epic and free us from this repetitive work...i just can do primitive html and c++ a bit and never wanted to learn code but love doing CGI and editing..

    • @rabdpnguin
      @rabdpnguin Рік тому +3

      I gave the bot documentation for a serial port device it didn't know anything about, and it started writing code to interface with it and explaining the documentation.

  • @GlaciusTS
    @GlaciusTS Рік тому +9

    Would be really cool to take whatever code generated that shape at the end and tell it that the code generated a very interesting twisted shape that you weren’t intending. But you feel inspired and you’d like to see if Chat GPT could use these sorts of principals to generate alien architecture, or some sort of spider-web floating city or something.

  • @romannavratilid
    @romannavratilid Рік тому

    WOW... this fricking crazy...especially the Bulk Actions part...

  • @SamuraiG
    @SamuraiG Рік тому

    I tried this to create a simple table and it did a good job.

  • @davestorm6718
    @davestorm6718 Рік тому +3

    I just started to use this. I always have trouble getting my CSS to look right (to the customer), especially oddball alignments and pop overs, etc. It's saved me hours of fiddling with CSS and JS, and while mistakes abound, they're easily correctable

  • @21EC
    @21EC Рік тому +1

    BTW...if the script it writes gets stopped in the middle of it then you can tell it to "continue" and it will sometimes be able to continue from where it stopped (it just gets messed up a bit with the type of text it then shows)

  • @21EC
    @21EC Рік тому +15

    Holy shit...no this is unreal..we live in the future..it's a bit too intimidating to know that we have the tech to give a computer a description of a Python script and get it from an AI like that in a few seconds/minutes..I can't believe this is real (I thought about this idea before of AI being able to write apps and such but didn't expect it to come that quickly)

  • @julienyt1600
    @julienyt1600 Рік тому +1

    There are often what we call "+1 errors" with language models. Which means the code it gave you that failed could have just a small iteration mistake, etc...
    It doesn't really understand the code, it tries to do something that looks to make sense given the context.
    Try to ask it to multiply numbers to see what I mean.
    There's a chance it could have fixed the script if you asked it the right way.
    There's a new kind of job called "prompt engineer", people who know how to query generative models efficiently

  • @kpw84u2
    @kpw84u2 Рік тому

    What you saw with that taffy pull at the end is when chaos and fractals combine. 🤩 Good stuff!

  • @cryptocoinkiwi8272
    @cryptocoinkiwi8272 Рік тому +3

    I asked GPT who would win in a fight Batman or Spiderman.
    It told me it wasn't productive to talk about violence...

    • @rayujohnson1302
      @rayujohnson1302 Рік тому +1

      It told me: In a battle between the two, Spider-Man's superhuman abilities and agility might give him an initial advantage, but Batman's intelligence and resourcefulness could allow him to find a way to neutralize Spider-Man's powers or outmaneuver him. Ultimately, it's difficult to say who would win in a battle between the two, as it would depend on the specific circumstances and strategies employed by each character.

  • @AcharaStudios
    @AcharaStudios Рік тому +1

    The shape at 10:45 is a Cylon Baseship of course

  • @Quarkss
    @Quarkss Рік тому +28

    As a software developer I feel it’s really nice, like the code generated is super dope… definitely not going to replace human programmers lol, but like if you’re junior - mid level in an area of development you’d be crazy to not use this AI to get ahead in the workspace… I use it to code small repetitive things for me while I’m working on something else, then I just swap over - code review what the AI sent me, if it’s good I’ll put it in.
    I do see people, those who are probably not devs worry about jobs being replaced, don’t think so… maybe in 15 years SOME if we are thinking that way.. think about this, Web Developers still have jobs and there are 100+ websites that will auto generate you a website + database for $30 lmao, now we have this AI?… YOURE fine.
    As of right now, the AI is basically a coding assistant, like if we all had some super smart intern follow us around to do our bidding.

    • @atraxisdarkstar
      @atraxisdarkstar Рік тому +2

      As someone brand new, it is amazing for telling you how to turn your ideas into code, and basically useless for telling you how to get the code to actually run.

    • @AndreasKempe
      @AndreasKempe Рік тому +3

      Software "developers" like you will definitely be replaced by such "AI" in the near future. Super Dope.

    • @Quarkss
      @Quarkss Рік тому +2

      @@AndreasKempe I hope so. Good thing I have other skills in life to make money… others in my field, probably not on my level. I hope AI takes over game development first though - those are the laziest most unskilled devs you’ll ever meet in your life

    • @PDCMYTC
      @PDCMYTC Рік тому +1

      @@AndreasKempe idiot detected lol.
      Just say you don't know what you're talking about.
      According to you, reading documentation for an API would mean someone isn't a developer lmao.

    • @AndreasKempe
      @AndreasKempe Рік тому

      @@PDCMYTC einer der sich "DONT CHECK MY UA-camCHANNEL" nennt sollte mit dem Wort "Idiot" sehr vorsichtig sein.

  • @Ezpz_omi
    @Ezpz_omi Рік тому

    at 10:28+ that wuld be a perfect mesh style for an ailen cave/landscape

  • @timothycottrell2635
    @timothycottrell2635 Рік тому

    dude your hair is heroic I'm very jealous!

  • @lcdvasrm
    @lcdvasrm Рік тому +1

    The shape at 10:30 is what you get when you try to obtain a 3D Mandelbrot set by naive method. Those that invented the mandelbulb, went that path.

  • @21EC
    @21EC Рік тому +10

    I managed to get a simple "simulation" using ChatGPT of spherical objects that are moving around in random directions and they "eat" the other type of objects which are considered as food, pretty crazy ! I also got a from it a blender python script of a branch like line of shrinking boxes..so damn cool ! it's incredible.

  • @nowthis100
    @nowthis100 Рік тому +8

    I promise! In 5 years, an ai robot will be a housekeeper in your house! If it doesn't work, I'll shoot Haribo jelly to the person who left a comment.

    • @RTCFMO
      @RTCFMO Рік тому +1

      Can I have the haribo jelly in 5 years if it doesn't happen?

  • @Zicrus
    @Zicrus Рік тому +4

    1:35 That script can actually place the cubes as far away as 17.3 units from the origin, since it places them in a cube instead of a sphere.

  • @Stopinvadingmyhardware
    @Stopinvadingmyhardware Рік тому +1

    That’s funny, that means they have solved for -z along the linear algebra space. That means they’ve almost figured out the correct formula for the Standard Model.
    Let’s see if they came up with the same formula I did.

  • @murators4732
    @murators4732 Рік тому +1

    I think the „unknown Objekt“ at 10:30 is the view of Feigenbaum diagram in the Mandelbrot set.
    Look for Mandelbrot and Feigenbaum diagram. Actually it’s the same but different view.

  • @shoxdanger
    @shoxdanger Рік тому

    love the hans klok hair keep it up

  • @profpenatieri
    @profpenatieri Рік тому +3

    An excellent challenge would be to use Chat-GPT and Blender to build a 3D character with that huge tuft of yours!

    • @cryptogalaxpert6113
      @cryptogalaxpert6113 Рік тому +1

      Fun to see a guy from the 80s explaining us how to use chatGPT. Must be a time traveller or smth

  • @DL88740
    @DL88740 Рік тому

    I asked it to create a few characters and a human arm, and results were interesting, especially arm since GPT applied bone structure to it

  • @SebastianPappG
    @SebastianPappG Рік тому +1

    Daaamn son goku, what's with that hair? :))) looks so cool.

  • @tovermoran4360
    @tovermoran4360 Рік тому +2

    I was just wondering about this concept and BAM your video popped up! I imagine this could be very powerful for Houdini too. Exciting stuff. Thanks for the great video!

  • @atraxisdarkstar
    @atraxisdarkstar Рік тому

    As a brand new Python using, I've been using ChatGPT to help me make games in Pygame.
    I find it is absolutely brilliant for telling me how to take an idea and turn it into code, how to clean up and organize my code, more efficient ways to accomplish what I want to accomplish.
    However after my code gets to be a few hundred lines, any time there's a bug, ChatGPT has a very hard time finding solutions that don't break something else. Often I get stuck in recursive loops where Thing A is broken, so I get a solution that fixes that, but breaks Thing B. And the only solutions it offers me to fix Thing B would undo the fix for Thing A. Try to ask for third options and it gets confused and keeps telling me to do those two things over and over.
    Sometimes starting a new conversation helps, but sometimes the new conversation won't let you post codeshare links, which is unfortunate.

  • @redgen6485
    @redgen6485 Рік тому

    I was asking ChatGPT about its coding capabilities. In short, it "admitted" that it is not capable of writing completely new code, it only combines different pieces of code that it saw and changes values, strings and variable names. Though it is still very useful, kinda StackOverflow on steroids.

  • @ZUnknownFox
    @ZUnknownFox Рік тому

    I read the title and realized I never thought about if Chatgpt could write a python script.

  • @tortysoft
    @tortysoft Рік тому

    from PIL import Image
    # Image size
    width, height = 800, 600
    # Create a blank image with a white background
    img = Image.new('RGB', (width, height), (255, 255, 255))
    # The complex plane
    real_min, real_max = -2, 1
    imag_min, imag_max = -1, 1
    real_range = real_max - real_min
    imag_range = imag_max - imag_min
    # Maximum number of iterations
    max_iter = 256
    # Generate the Mandelbrot set
    for x in range(width):
    for y in range(height):
    # Map pixel position to complex number
    c = complex(real_min + x * real_range / (width - 1), imag_min + y * imag_range / (height - 1))
    # Iterate until the point is outside of the circle with radius 2
    z = 0
    for i in range(max_iter):
    if abs(z) > 2:
    break
    # Compute the next iteration
    z = z**2 + c
    # Color the point based on the number of iterations
    img.putpixel((x, y), (i % 8 * 32, i % 16 * 16, i % 32 * 8))
    # Save the image
    img.save('mandelbrot.png')

    • @tortysoft
      @tortysoft Рік тому

      This python code was generated by chatGPT very quickly. It took me far longer to get it to run though, but ... GPT told me how - which was even more impressive !

  • @sphinxpx2936
    @sphinxpx2936 Рік тому +1

    Make that final shape into a nicely lit wallpaper file!

  • @artemiasalina1860
    @artemiasalina1860 Рік тому

    I don't have time to mess around with it now but a fun thing to play with would be to have it generate BVH mocap files of the motions you want that are targeted at a standard Rigify rig. You would need to specify the FPS, but the bot should be able to generate everything else. BVH files are just plain text files so it should be easy to cut-n-paste to a file. I'd be interested to see if it could generate accurate animations for the human, dog, and bird rigs.

    • @StrayCreations
      @StrayCreations  Рік тому

      Since it's a language model the outputs for full meshes and animation are very limited. This could change in the future though, since people are constantly discovering new uses for ChatGPT

  • @DerperDaDerpa
    @DerperDaDerpa Рік тому

    Dude that's so cool! Subscribed 👍

  • @blenderviking
    @blenderviking Рік тому

    Great video! I made an add on for Blender using Chat-GPT. Now I have a render button that can render out a scene with multiple cameras. No manual work 💪😂

  • @mathisnoiz
    @mathisnoiz Рік тому +1

    WTF BRO, i actually was trying to do fractal scripts with chat gpt just yesterday! The fractal at the end is quaternion!

  • @aiartrelaxation
    @aiartrelaxation Рік тому +2

    I love Chat GPT ..use it for everything 😁

  • @overlordprincekhan
    @overlordprincekhan Рік тому

    This is revolutionary.

  • @Calco33
    @Calco33 Рік тому

    Insane, this is really amazing

  • @imercutio
    @imercutio Рік тому +1

    The shape is called an "Imperial Star Destroyer Point Cloud" :-)

  • @olearris
    @olearris Рік тому +75

    If people think this will take over coding jobs than all jobs can be taken by AI. And at that point why would humans even need school or education if we don't need to run things for ourselves and the AI handles it all. We'll become consumers and only consumers.

    • @sonario6489
      @sonario6489 Рік тому +19

      We would need school and education only for doing this stuff for fun at that point. That's when we'll eventually realize that having a job doesn't matter in the long run. What matters is your passion/hobby.

    • @AironyAi
      @AironyAi Рік тому +6

      @@sonario6489 the only passion/hobby you will have is consuming stuff.

    • @sonario6489
      @sonario6489 Рік тому +6

      @@AironyAi And making art/animation for yourself.

    • @AironyAi
      @AironyAi Рік тому +6

      @@sonario6489 but if everything is automated, do you think people will develope any skills? art skills? like in wall-e :D

    • @sonario6489
      @sonario6489 Рік тому +11

      @@AironyAi There's always a choice to not use automation for certain things if you like the manual approach better

  • @jendabekCZ
    @jendabekCZ Рік тому +11

    ChatGPT isn't very useful for Blender scripting - when you ask it for anything more specific than some funny small code snippets, it will start to hallucinate fictional methods and other nonsense.
    Which makes sense, because Blender coding is way less popular than a regular Python, and so the training data didn't contain enough examples to put together answers from.
    But it is a language model (which isn't optimized for programming or math at all), so not surprising. It's actually impressive it still can generate some code.
    It would be great to have a one trained for programming though, then it could actually become very useful.

    • @StrayCreations
      @StrayCreations  Рік тому +3

      Hi Jan,
      It's true that ChatGPT is prone to mistakes, not only misunderstanding what you need but also by just making bogus scripts and claiming that they work. For someone like me, who is a newbie to code, it can be a very useful tool to use code and learn to understand it. I also regularly ask it how to fix other stuff in Blender instead of trying to find the right article or video on the Internet. With that said, everyone should absolutely still be encouraged to develop proper knowledge of coding if they want to get into it, even if only to create better prompts for AI. Without this knowledge I'm sure people will still fall behind and waste time compared to seasoned programmers.

    • @jendabekCZ
      @jendabekCZ Рік тому

      @@StrayCreations Sure, but in it's current state I am not sure it is good to use it for bugfixing or learning, because programming isn't just about being happy it works somehow.
      Better to verify it's answers in some competent sources.

    • @xentrix89
      @xentrix89 Рік тому +1

      its a language model but its built in part on a codex model that's why it can code like it does

    • @gabrielmoro3d
      @gabrielmoro3d Рік тому +1

      The ability to select all objects that have the same color is already something super useful for me…

    • @jinxxpwnage
      @jinxxpwnage Рік тому +1

      I work currently as a houdini particle effects artist in AA games. For cutscenes and houdini engine as well as multiple pass compositing. I use mainly VEX code whenever i can as it runs often twice as efficient and also it's more intuitive. Things like vop switch conditions can be written as "if" statements. And deletion of points and noise deformers is also sped up. I've asked chatgpt3 for days to write me a code or make the code better. It always always messes it up or makes up syntax or makes fake functions that have never existed. Complex issues aren't as easy as telling it to code a basic port scanner in python. I'm super let down by AI right now. Also some workflows aren't even on the web I've noticed. Like creating an efficient vortex for water sim using the gravity forces from normal orientations instead of velocities. It's unable to build things like this often as well.

  • @genbab6989
    @genbab6989 Рік тому

    the fractal at 10:30 kinda reminds me of the burning ship mandelbrot

  • @travisbehrendsen6992
    @travisbehrendsen6992 Рік тому

    I was using it to write a simple Circuit board material, it was missing a few steps and didn't account for the right properties, i can see its usefulness if you stuck or have an error as it will help you find the problem esp. if your using scripts.

  • @B4uneed
    @B4uneed Рік тому +1

    little David Bowie!
    Thank you :)

  • @reganovich
    @reganovich Рік тому

    the last thing it made looks like muscle fibers!! great vid

  • @les_amateurs
    @les_amateurs Рік тому

    It's impressive that it knows how to deal with software APIs. My biggest concern is that the generated code could be harmful for the content of a scene (Not even mentioning your computer). I think that with the right technical description, ChatGPT can do wonders but in the wrong hands it will easily break things. One very good thing is, we can use it to learn how to code.

    • @robertmaxey5406
      @robertmaxey5406 Рік тому

      I just watched a presentation of a demo using ChatGPT where the presenter created some rather novel software to create havoc. Perhaps everyone now has the ability to screw up systems with code they do not understand . Think hyper-powered script kiddies on steroids. It will only get worse.

  • @HaikuTutorials
    @HaikuTutorials Рік тому

    This is just wow!! Thank you for this video.

  • @armanbath
    @armanbath Рік тому +1

    great video and the algo recognizes that! keep it up

  • @KCM25NJL
    @KCM25NJL Рік тому +1

    First thing I thought when you showed the fractal pillar, was an inverse of the script that creates a fractal hole. Then animating the pillar into the hole for a seamless fractal shaped precision fit demo.

  • @espacemaxim
    @espacemaxim Рік тому +1

    Which everything does it exactly change?

  • @jeremvfx
    @jeremvfx Рік тому +1

    Amazing video , definitely subscribing

  • @somedude5951
    @somedude5951 Рік тому +1

    This 3d shape surely looks like some Julia code.
    There are many shapes to be made using fractals, that looks like of of them.
    A shape constructed from a mathematical formula.

  • @ahammedfarhan
    @ahammedfarhan Рік тому

    10:45 I think it is a Quaternion Julia Fractal.

  • @c-LAW
    @c-LAW Рік тому +1

    Chatgmt will be like the first time we surfed the web in 1992

  • @dissonanceparadiddle
    @dissonanceparadiddle Рік тому +1

    I wonder if the funky shape at the end is a example of a fractal function that has each cross section slice as a 2d fractal that then modulates a value as it goes from right to left out up or down or however it calculated the shape. Maybe even by rotation. It's kinda like an MRI maybe

  • @32hammasta
    @32hammasta Рік тому

    Thanks, maybe I will use this someday :)

  • @nunu_filmz
    @nunu_filmz Рік тому +1

    your a genius

  • @s3k3tv8
    @s3k3tv8 Рік тому

    ChatGPT is the response to google’ keyword search deficiencies. Unprecedented.

  • @McCucumber
    @McCucumber Рік тому +1

    This software is pretty incredible. I had it write a speech for me to read at a town hall meeting. I posted it to the community tab on my page. I also tried some other things. I asked it if it could write code for a bot that responds to every mention of the word "mccucumber" on twitter and it said "sure" and wrote up the code and instructed me how to use it. Crazy.

  • @chj.schwarz
    @chj.schwarz Рік тому

    very good, nicely structured video and magnificent hair my guy 👌

  • @eftorq
    @eftorq Рік тому

    Most of the things mentioned here can be done in Houdini. Most of them faster than you can type out the text for ChatGPT

    • @DonHall666
      @DonHall666 Рік тому

      Make a video about Houdini then. We're here because it's Blender and Blender is what we use.

    • @eftorq
      @eftorq Рік тому +1

      @@DonHall666 chill my comment isn't against Blender, it's more about ChatGPT hindering the learning process. It's a tool not a one size fits all solution

    • @DonHall666
      @DonHall666 Рік тому

      @@eftorq it sounds like you're too chill over there. Put up some proof, show us how Houdini can do what you say in a shorter time. Teach us the things you think this tool is taking away from our learning. Otherwise you're really just answering a question nobody's asked.

  • @porky1118
    @porky1118 Рік тому

    You can also use × instead of x

  • @WillyFooLiveStudios
    @WillyFooLiveStudios Рік тому +1

    Just a slight correction. It takes many million dollars to train chatGPT and it will not be constantly updated due to that. But the next iteration GPT 4 will be many many folds better than this current version 3.5

    • @saulsantos4132
      @saulsantos4132 Рік тому +1

      Not sure, having many characters , doesn’t mean it 100 times better, but lets see.

    • @itsbazyli
      @itsbazyli Рік тому

      you can "continue" training the dataset without starting from scratch.

    • @kulkarni005
      @kulkarni005 Рік тому

      Its updating every Week ! - you can see small text below prompt like 'ChatGPT Jan 9 Version'.

  • @trafficface
    @trafficface Рік тому +3

    I’ve been doing this too for a few weeks but i do find it gets a bit confused by legacy api and later blender versions

    • @StrayCreations
      @StrayCreations  Рік тому +4

      Hi Adam. I understand, there is a lot more to say about troubleshooting the scrips made by ChatGPT. I am releasing a new video tomorrow where I go way more in depth on how to deal with these problems.

  • @SuperMyckie
    @SuperMyckie Рік тому +1

    While tech advancement is good... it also takes away man's intuitive thinking and problem solving neurons.... when your brain stops working and completely relies on a machine, it deprecates those neurons it'd use ordinarily to addresss such problems... that is why, even with the plenty advanced cinematography tools (camera, rendering machines, realtimes... etc) yet the quality of movies we see now are dropping faster than the tools are growing... we only still appreciate good films from Old seasoned directors and filmmakers who still use traditional skills to make better use of the modern equipment...

    • @kulkarni005
      @kulkarni005 Рік тому +1

      no , its because it was the stuff we experienced at our younger age.
      GenZ just cant relate to it.

  • @L_tlu
    @L_tlu Рік тому

    10:18 maybe related to the burning ship but 3d?? idk

  • @gtziavelis
    @gtziavelis Рік тому

    The unknown fractal shape at 10:25 is a 3-D Lyapunov fractal...? the "inflection point" at 10:42 looks uniquely like a cross or an X, which is a common defining feature to Lyapunov fractals. highly recommend to check out article called "Exploring Lyapunov Space" by Tom Gidden, March 8, 2017, on Medium.

  • @eric3492
    @eric3492 Рік тому

    Black background with black edges and black vértices. Smart.

  • @JulianDZenim
    @JulianDZenim Рік тому

    ChatGPT is now like the Genius from a Magic lamp, So now we all gotta know how to make a good wish to demand.

  • @21EC
    @21EC Рік тому

    WTF?!!? I told it to find a bug in a script it wrote and it found it and explained it to me in a the right spots of the scripts and then I even asked it to give me the full corrected fixed script and it worked...it gave me then the full script...no..this is too incredibly advanced and sophisticated AI, I feel like it came from the far future, so crazy !

  • @zinruinoshinzitsu
    @zinruinoshinzitsu Рік тому

    What a amazing way this is .... !!
    I feel I'm lucky to meet such video.

  • @sjoervanderploeg4340
    @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому +4

    I had ChatGPT generate multithreaded code to crack passwords with Python, this thing is great because you can ask it to simply generate the routine you imagined and then implement it however you see fit!

    • @sjoervanderploeg4340
      @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому

      If kind of looks like a point cloud that they create for particle collision simulations :D

    • @StrayCreations
      @StrayCreations  Рік тому

      You make a great point! By giving ChatGPT a clear set of instructions that you know should make sense within the context of the application you're using, it will usually generate a better script.

    • @sjoervanderploeg4340
      @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому +1

      @@StrayCreations not necessarily better, but it will guide you on the steps you need to take!

  • @BreezyDefrag
    @BreezyDefrag Рік тому

    It's a shame that is completely overloaded now... I haven't been able to get into ChatGPT for that last week or so... which sucks cause I am a new game designer and it was really helping me to understand how to program and create a game I am working on...

  • @stable_davefusion
    @stable_davefusion Рік тому

    That weird one reminds me of a 3d fractal (Mandelbulber?) I saw called the Burning Ship or something to that effect.

  • @nickpage9138
    @nickpage9138 Рік тому

    The abstract object looks like a a mineral/rock natural crystal type formation. I bet there are some natural minerals formed in this way. Obviously not using chat GPT and Blender, but how the Mandelbrot is seen in most of nature and formed from the Mandelbrot formation/pattern.

  • @joaoestudante1897
    @joaoestudante1897 Рік тому

    the strage object at 8:00 looks like a 3d mandelbrot...(?)

  • @1DInciner
    @1DInciner Рік тому

    About weird shape:
    ua-cam.com/video/N9Tnmbnl9Yw/v-deo.html

  • @MrJDuckyy
    @MrJDuckyy Рік тому

    Came for GPT. Liked & Sub'd because you're a handsome barstool and this was a 10/10 video.

  • @tnkspecjvive
    @tnkspecjvive Рік тому

    Impressive 😵‍💫

  • @godblessyou7962
    @godblessyou7962 Рік тому +1

    it coded a full game in Unity3D in 3 days (I had only time evenings)

  • @MCOmegaX123
    @MCOmegaX123 Рік тому

    I just tried to use ChatGPT to generate a script the same way you do in this video (except out of habit I phrased it as a request rather than a command), and it said that it can't do that because it needs a 3D modeling software like Blender.

  • @sherlockholmes7625
    @sherlockholmes7625 Рік тому

    Wow, incredible

  • @tomaszkloza5028
    @tomaszkloza5028 Рік тому

    What prompts did you use to generate the last 3d organic shape? some points in layers?

  • @f550calori6
    @f550calori6 Рік тому

    Can you generare 3d model whith gpt ortogonal photos?