The Most Controversial Archaeological Discovery - The Lost Tomb Of Jesus - Archaeology Documentary
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 чер 2021
- In 1980, a bulldozer accidentally uncovered a first-century tomb in Jerusalem. Of the ten ossuaries (stone coffins) found inside, six bore inscriptions: Jesus son of Joseph, Maria, Mariamene (the name by which Mary Magdalene was known), Joseph, Matthew, and Judah son of Jesus. Dismissed by archaeologists as coincidence, the ossuaries were warehoused and forgotten. Twenty-five years later, filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici and his team went in search of the ossuaries…and the lost tomb. What they found may well be the most controversial archaeological discovery of all time.
🎞 🍿🎥📽🎬 Watch more free documentaries on I Love Docs • This Man Single Handed...
📼 I Love Docs is where you can find curated award-winning documentaries.
Don't miss an upload. Subscribe to I Love Docs / ilovedocs
Discover our other channels with free movies and tv series:
▶️ Top Box TV: / syndicado
▶️ North of Main for Independent movies: / northofmain
▶️ Syndicado Reality: / syndicadoreality
#ilovedocs #documentary #documentaries - Фільми й анімація
Simcha, this is excellent. I love watching all you do. You think deeper than most researchers and I can follow.
The jesus tomb unmasked by dr. craig Go watch that..
Jesus rose after 3 Days he defeated Satan and death.Then he spent 40 days with his 12 as they watched him Ascend
@@georgeferry280
Jesus spirit ascended didn't need his bones. he was issued a new body in heaven.
@@badlilstangi checked. This video is spreading false info and gets audience convinced the Tomb belons Jesus's fam. This video is a trap
Simcha’s tenacity is mind boggling. Bravo to him. I have watched and enjoyed so much of his work. This one blew my mind. 🙏🏻
Cesare Jesus Borgia KJV 1507
A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible
@conversative .
He thrives on ignorance, I hope he thanks you for obliging!
Fascinating and well documented. That there is no continuing exploration doesn’t surprise me. Man is his own worse enemy when it comes to history. Seems that will never change. Thanks to those that sought this out. ☮️✌️🖖
Thank you Jesus ❤️
A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible
I admire the hard work, dedication and respect this archeology team has for the tomb of Jesus' family & history altogether. This documentary has me in tears for some reason I cannot explain. Jesus & Mary, I would've been one of your very faithful followers, as I am today. This is just fascinating. 🇮🇱✝️✡️
You lie, don't fool yourself into thinking you are something you are not .
No follower would dare disgrace him with a pagan name such as the pagan Christianosis does .
Jews hate Christians! They defile our heritage they defile our Elohim
You are absolutely right I cry too when I watch Disneyland fairy tale movies and read there books. Dear Heavenly Mickey Mouse we praise you and are faithful followers Amen 🙏
Nu b
@@holysmokes3723 😂 sooooo goooood!
Don't believe that our Lord's bones were put in some box! Jesus was taken by God and he took all of him!
Check out the new evidence on the Shroud of Turin and see how it proves that he was resurrected! When he left the cave he was whole and didn't leave his bones!!!
Finding his bones doesn't or wouldn't disrupt my faith. It actually makes more sense to me as he doesn't need a body. We all become spirit
Wow that's... stupid. Really? The fact, and it is a fact that hundreds of people were put to death for their testimony that they saw Jesus alive, that Jesus raised himself from the dead is the centerpiece of the Christian faith. This documentary is notning but a lie.
@@a.d.marshall2748 Brother... how about speaking the truth in love... not calling people RACA? The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did.
Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision.
The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being.
Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into a spirit being.
@@Freeman_Actual Don't call me your brother. You deny the bodily resurrection. You are no brother of mine. I'm no brother of snakes.
@@Freeman_Actual The person responding to you on this thread is exemplary of the issues which are hindering further investigations and discoveries. Some people can’t handle the truth, some are afraid of it and some have a very superficial experience of faith. This guy just reads the Bible and that’s it. He has no interest in further development and solidification of his faith. So, if the “literal” is ever challenged, people like him tend to become lost and afraid, which manifests as anger and hostility to anyone who threatens his so called faith. Sad, but that’s the world we live in.
Yeshua is God. Body + Soul +Spirit. You can't take away the body.
To me it would be historically interesting if they could prove this. It only confirms the Bible with more historical proof. When Jesus rose from the grave he was able to pass through walls, appear from thin air, and his own disciples did not recognize him when walking with him until he revels himself. He was very clearly no longer in his human body. Many (if not all) of the disciples and many of the eye witness believers where tortured and put to death. None would stop teaching, or renounce him. Would you do that for a lie? They knew what they saw, and most of them died for it!!
There's very little history that as biblical proof including that of Jesus. Using the Bible to prove the Bible is like using the Harry Potter books to prove the Wizarding world is real.
@@Cynnas my comment was about proving this tomb to be the tomb of Jesus’s family would only support the Bible… tell me again how that’s using the Bible to prove the Bible? This documentary is about archaeological evidence… 😊
You forget according to the gospels Thomas placed his finger's into and felt the wounds in his hands and side.
That being said if Jesus was a spirit and not flesh Thomas wouldn't have been able to touch or feel the wounds of Jesus.
@@wawoodsman7198 you would have to assume God is unable to make his spirit into solid matter for that to be relevant. I assume he can do anything . More then likely he did this to help them believe he was the same person they watched die. Does not mean he was in the same body. Good observation though!
AMEN! (Tiotheberk). You are true Berean! Nothing like Biblical Truth!
Amazing documentary! My mom's a huge fan. Thank you for all your amazing work!
This is one of the best documentaries that I have ever seen.
I'm impressed with the time effort and work of Simcha. Not just in documenting this. I'm talking also about his lifetime of study and hard work just to get to this point. A rare and unique man. Many gifts not wasted.
Concur in full, phenomenal documentary
@@johnfritz7222 SUCKER: “a person who believes everything they are told and is therefore easy to deceive” - Cambridge Dictionary
Expensive!
@Richard Dames Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008.
Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.
Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus
@@mythbuster1483 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going. Proverbs 14:15 This verse proves the Buybull is true; lol; j/k!
The most fascinating Doc I've ever watched! Bravo to the mother in the beginning that called the police to stop the demolition, without whom we would not be the wiser!
@James Barlow really, what? Are you serious?
@James Barlow He is not!! What’s your proof? I’ve seen him on other specials and he’s right up there! Just have to come on and put a nail in it! Go find somewhere where people give a damn!
I was in the REAL tomb of Jesus ...He was not there !
@@A-Grammie-On-the-ROCK That’s Not funny AT ALL! If you had any decency you wouldn’t joke like that! I expect crazy from the left so you must belong in his cult! 💩 head!
Sarcasm, people…😒
It’s shows like this that reconfirm and strengthens my faith. When they showed that they used the lab at the police department in Suffolk county, where I live, that’s all I needed. It’s amazing that even today, God is speaking to us that he is there, we only have to stop and listen. God bless those archaeologists that worked, and fought to uncover the truth. 😊
they actually proved that Jesus' body was removed from the original tomb and, after several months or perhaps a year or so, his remnants were placed in a bone box. that means, after several months or perhaps a year, his bones were still in the tomb.
I want to add that I was living during three years 100 meters from the place . I know the feeling from being close . Is an incredible feeling , strong and deep , and peaceful . But it is from his family being , or having been there . And it's not a small thing . I am a jewish believer in Jesus , and I know that his bones wasn't there. Because He resurrected .
I think this is potentially the best documentary I've ever seen. There's references to what the accepted story of Jesus is, new evidence that is scientifically backed, and incredibly informative in general. I'm not a Christian or Jewish, and I still found this to be very interesting and curious about some of the things mentioned in this film. Thank you for this, Simcha! Keep up the amazing work!
If jesus and Mary magdalene has a son name judah. Then who is Sarah in france that also said its thier daughter. Do they have 2 children?
Right I’m shocked no one’s is talking about this like it’s the “jesus son of Joseph”. The whole family found with one of the tombs having a missing corpse… Everything just shock’s me like I had a very hard time believing it was real lmao
The Shroud is now accepted as the burial cloth of Jesus, documenting a supernatural event that proves his resurrection. There were no bones left behind. Not to mention the matching Sudarium (the head covering). Him having children was never mentioned, nor a wife.
@Jesus Is Lord 9
@@ginastockwell101 cheezus is lard
There's more money in myth than truth!
Exactly!!!
Nomogop Nomogop - Are you talking about the incredible wealth and power of the Roman Catholic Church? Not sure what you are saying. Health and Peace, Paul
Churches are anti-Mashyah. Attempting to deny and/or replace the written witness and agreement
Money is not the goal.
That would make sense if Israel's government was made up of Jew's but it's not.
The governing body of Israel are Muslims.
Very Very interesting!! The editor of the is a Genius !! Superbly put together!!! Masterpiece !! Of work and Art. Thank You 😊 Sir.
Loved it! Excellent doc.
I couldn’t get past the part where they ditch the bones without testing them. Even if they’re not the family of the historical Jesus it’s helpful to determine their lineage. Any skeleton DNA should be recorded for potential future comparison.
DNA testing didn't really take off until the 90's
I especially find it interesting that they can ditch the bones in the cemetery considering all the ancient laws regarding tombs and burial. Do we even know for sure the Jesus's ossuary had bones in it? We have burial funerals today without a body.
Yes, and they could have easily IDed crucifixion marks.
Could very well have buried his burial strips and face cloth.
The only thing it would prove is that Jews of today are not related to ancient Hebrew Israelites.
I'm not a person or religious belief but i love watching stuff like this and this particular Documentary is really fascinating.
If you believe this video from Liberal Hollywood...You would like my alien from mars...that I have in a freezer.
Religious is based off religion. You can believe in something and not be religious.
I've watched a number of these and the bias I see sometimes within the archaeology field is stunning. Some are so dismissive if it's at all Biblically related.
Those tombs were amazing even if they had nothing to do with the Biblical story.
C. j. vvv M
well of course you want to believe in the supernatural fairy tales...no doubt it would upset you jesus had a wife and a son and his tomb found showing he wasn't resurrected etc.....
@@davidgarner3552 Your comment is so ignorant and full of ad hominem assumptions. You seem angry. Lest your comment betray your heart.
@@davidgarner3552 it would totally ruin everything they believed in, lol
@@ThereIsNoneButHim But it does not, for the Lord YAHSHUA [JESUS] resurrected on the third day, Amen. HalleluYAH! Well, what do you expect from blasphemers and liars (Talmud Judaism) but to invent and slander, for even ISAIAH 53, PSALMS 22 etc. they forbid millions of Israelis to read and understand, so accept JESUS as indeed the Messiah, Amen. Oh how easy it is to INVENT/produce ALL OF THIS, JUST LIKE in Universal Studios, Amen. LUKE 8.17 etc. Peace/Shalom
Wow !
Amazing lost for words
Great find and fantastic work
An mind expanding documentry. Fascinating. BraveFor archaeologist and scientists. Thank you for making this documentary!!
Anybody else watching this on a Sunday?:)
I watch it all the time! Love Simcha!!
I am.....
New Zealand
Sunday, December 5 ,2021
You guys did a fantastic job. I love it
Not only is this documentary fascinating and educational, it's entertaining
“In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008.
I found this documentary very interesting. However, I would like to know why genetic DNA research was conducted to establish whether Mary of Magdelene is related to Jesus but why wasn't the mother of Jesus and Jesus not tested? That would immediately give us an indication that Mary is Jesus mother..
My speculation, to see if there's any DNA matches to current day?
If, they would have Mary Magdalen(apologies for spelling!) DNA? That wouldn't prove a Relation to Jesus?
But. If Theories are correct? That Jesus had a child with Mary?
Anyone in current time, who has taken a DNA Test, could be traced back to Mary. They would be Assuming, that the Father of Mary's Child was Jesus
My guess anyway.
Dudes! Lol! Jesus, s , body is not there! Jesus, rose from the dead!Jesus, sits at the right side of God, s thrown !
@@josephlwallssr6166 if you're a biblical literalist, where do you think Jesus' body spent the time between the crucifixion and his arising? A tomb.
@@Kevin_Fiol he didn’t lay there for a year. He was in the tomb 3 days and three nights.
@@Kevin_Fiol Desended, into hell to inform Satan, he lost! Lol! Read the Bible! Better, yet, listen to a few lectures, of Dr.Michael Heisner!
All I can say is WOW, fantastic docci!
We can surely have a pretty good idea of how frequent the name Yeshoua was during the first century. One way is to gather all the male first names from the New Testament, and/or gather every male first name on each ossuary found at the museum this documentary talks about. From this list, I think we would get a good idea of how popular was a certain name back then. I feel like the name Yeshoua wasn't that popular!
It was that popular. Jesus, Joseph, Mary, Judah we’re all incredibly popular names. All in the top 12, and 75% of the population shared similar names. There’s a video by the channel Expedition Bible that goes into the other aspects of this film. It also has some of the original people who were a part of the dig.
This doc is amazing! Really makes you think. I found myself saying "oh wow" a bunch of times.
An incredible piece of work. Great finds, theories, and science!
Watching again and one of my favorite shows ever.
This is what I dislike about the Israelites they don't take kindly for other's history or faith, whether it's a huge archeological find or not they care nothing about preserving such things because they prefer it all to be hidden & vanish except for what they deem worthy of validation. Honestly. Why cover this up? Why try hard to act like it doesn't matter? Just because you don't care doesn't mean it's not valid or valuable to others! Try for once to respect the history of other cultures & faiths then maybe history won't repeat it's self. Hence why I am proud of my history because we did our best to respect & preserved every historical places especially respect the dead, burial grounds are even more precious. To disrespectfully cover it up & build over them is unthinkable! Shame on uz! And thank you and God bless these people who did this documentary. Thank you so much for your hard work & the heartfelt belief that you kept going against all odds ! 💖🤲
Simcha is the best archaeologist ever! Thanks so much for your great documentaries!
He was never an archeologist. He’s a journalist by profession (and a forger)
The tomb of Jesus wasn’t accepted as genuine by the majority of scholars.
@@Castellano97 lol stay mad, your jesus is a fraud.
He most assuredly is an archaeologist. I’ve seen his television programs and documentaries like The Naked Archaeologist in which he plays himself. He’s sorta the nouveau Carl Sagan of archaeology for our times.
@@Castellano97 I trust science over scholars.
Wow! That was an amazing documentary! From the beginning I felt like I was on a treasure hunt the whole time. Excellent work!!
Check out the Ron Wyatt documentary
This document is fascinating thank you all and God Bless you all. 🙏🇦🇺
The portrait drawn up of the Jesus family tomb is fascinating. I have long felt there was something fundamentally wrong with the traditional Church version of the life of Jesus.
Professor James Tabor and Mr. Jacobovici have here created a masterpiece.
A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible
Anything to do with archeology is usually better than other videos !
Wow! I'm speechless! Excellent work and great job! Perhaps one day when the time is ordained by God Himself, the tomb will be opened (spiritually) for all to see regardless of modern theology dating back as far as 300!
Thank you for your effort and hard work!
Best video of the life of Jesus by knowing the family names. Explained clearly in great details. I enjoyed watching this video, as it explains more about the family of Jesus that is never explained any where else. Very interesting documentary.😄😄😄😍
It seems odd that a woman came out and stopped the digging of this tomb that had been opened for a long time.
Right, they discovered it in 1981.
Exceptional scholar and geneologist who have made many people have questions answered about the man Jesus. Thank you my man always got my mind open for new positive history discoveries
Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008.
Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.Dr.
Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus
What discoveries?
It's all a deception, an attempt to fool you, to lead you from the truth; that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and ascended up into heaven. This man is no scholar, he is one who serves the devil with his attempt at deception. Only a fool would believe a man, over the inspired Word of God.
Whoa, this is a must watch documentary!
Incredible research and fantastic placement of what is beginning to look more and more like history instead of his story.
Compelling information and very well presented. An amazing investigation! Backed up and informed by solid research. So exciting!
Completely false though
@@wichitadisciple9874 according to you? you dont even have a real name or a picture, lol, you as fake as can be
My faith is strengthened. The fact that this style of burial was so short of time. Did God want them to be found? I'm listening open mind.
Simcha has balls of steel.. "It seems unnecessary to ask permission to unseal a tomb from an organization that never sealed it".. It's His respect for these places of Archeological interest that allows Him to be so protected. He literally opens doors with His HEART.
I have nothing against the Jews first off. They ARE God's chosen, but they sure wouldn't want proof of Jesus to come out. Nothings changed in 2000 years.
@@vanadians3819 Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008.
Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.
Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus
@@mythbuster1483 So you just gave no proof this story is BS. You need to change your name.
@@colecole3352 If it says so in a book with a talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, virgin birth and zombies, written by anonymous, biased members of a death cult, then it MUST be a reliable source?!! SUCKER: “a person who believes everything they are told and is therefore easy to deceive” - Cambridge Dictionary
@@colecole3352 Liars can claim anything, and fools can believe anything on faith, but “The burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded.” So let me know when you find some evidence to support absurd claims about an *INVISIBLE MAGIC SKY GENIE* , or that he impregnated Jesus’ mother 2,000 years ago, or that Jesus was a *VIRGIN-BORN DEMIGOD WITH SUPERPOWERS* and that his *ROTTING CORPSE MAGICALLY RETURNED FROM THE DEAD* before levitating bodily into outer space, or evidence for the talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, etc. LOL!
I just happen to LOVE Simcha Jacobovich!
This is really fascinating. I am moved.
I hadn’t seen this documentary since it first aired. Still a very suspenseful and spine-tingling documentary. Well done.
Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008.
Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.Dr.
Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus
Should watch the Ron Wyatt documentary
@@CanucksFanBoi "Ron Wyatt is either very psychologically ill or one of the greatest liars I have ever come across." Institute for Biblical & Scientific Studies
@@CanucksFanBoi Answers In Genesis, a Christian website, says "Ron Wyatt has claimed, among other things, to have discovered the following: The Ark of the Covenant...Noah’s house, and the graves of Mr and Mrs Noah, together with millions worth of her jewelry (allegedly then stolen from Wyatt)...An actual sample of Christ’s blood, with chromosomes allegedly still visible under the microscope, showing that there was no human father. Placed in growth medium, the cells began dividing, says Ron." LOL!
@@CanucksFanBoi Will do. Thanks for the suggestion.
This sends shivers down the spine. Great work, miraculous finding. Keep going, we are with you.
Oh really ? Well there is a lot of false unprovable info on here....you need to check out the other videos that speak of the real tomb of jesus ...I was in it ...and He was not there !
Oh yeah you got that right! We're watching!
It is widely believed by scholars that the Jesus in Talpiot (if this is indeed his name) is not Jesus of Nazareth, but a person with the same name, since he appears to have a son named Judas (buried next to him) and the tomb shows signs of belonging to a wealthy Judean family, while Jesus of Nazareth came from a low-class Galilean family.
Nothing shivers down the spine 😂, this is just a tomb which has similar names with lots of ifs and buts without solid proof. I believe dead sea scrolls would have sent a shivers down the spine for you.
Thank you for share this video.
Best documentary on Jesus archeology I've ever seen! 🙏
Whether this is the real one or not, it does not matter. No big deal.
What is important to us is that Jesus the Christ resurrected from the dead at left that tomb empty and he's alive today and forever!!!
The chevron symbolizing that which leads the way and the whole circle symbol below of the All-in-All. This resting place is dedicated as the family tomb.
This was awesome!❣️❣️❣️
Fascinating video. And I loved the narration by Lawrence Fishburn. Excellent work, Simcha!
One small but very important fact,
After his being placed in the tomb wrapped in cloth,everyone goes home.
The next morning Mary goes to the tomb to find that the body has gone and the cloths folded up neatly,
This is the next day so the body would have been whole, not just bones as placed in these stone boxes, Jesus meets all the deciples and offer for Thomas to put his find in the wounds of the nails so his body is solid.
This leaves the question how did his family get hold of the bones to put in this box.
I must point out that i am a believer, and do not doubt that question of who he was and what he did for us all, but i feel that there is a lot to be made for some people by coming up with something new, when in fact we should be paying attention to what he said.
I agree with you about that. My first thought about this was his resurrection.
It was not the next day, but I agree with your point. He has risen and is alive
Funny... I was all intrigued just watching the beginning of this and excitedly told my husband about it... his first words were... "So, there was no resurrection?" LOL... I felt dumb.
@@Lisa-ec9qb Maybe not.
@@MGreen-vz6yb *Quote:* _"Maybe not."_
Maybe so :) *John 11:25-26 (NKJV)* _25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. 26 And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”_
The devil is a liar.
Yes so what's your point???
@@assassinworks5538 you're in my prayers. Jesus loves you. I pray that you find the peace that only he can give, and comes through salvation. Much love :)
@@karfomachet7265 Read your bible.
@@ronsalles2627 why would I waste my time on that garbage ? And don't call that vile book ' your ' as if I would be connected to that trash
more like the devill is a lie/myth - before the Jews fell under the Zoroastrian Persian empire satan was an ally of god and when the Persians took over Judah satan becomes an exact copy of the Zoroastrian anti god airiman .Know the history of the myths u base your life on .
Awesome! Chapeau Simcha ! 🙏
Great to see inspired people do inspirational work.
“In addition, biblical scholar Stephen Pfann [Ph.D., Department of Ancient Semitic Languages, Hebrew University of Jerusalem] has questioned even the actual inscription on the tomb, claiming it's "scratchy" and hard to read. For all we know, it's Johnny, Mabel and Jerry.”- What Bones of Jesus? (2007)
the bible is not just a prophetical compilation of books but also a historical one. the bible said, Jesus has risen from the dead and the apostles and marty's testified about it, not to mention Flavius Josephus a jewish hostorian writing about the resurrection of Christ..
the most important question is, "why did the apostles willingly accepted their fate of martyrdom, if Yeshua bar Yosef did not rise from the dead?"
That is the 100 dollar question . Why would they be so willing, if their story wasn't true. People don't think that deep sometimes.
Why do martyrs in other religions willingly die? Does that also make their mythology true? They’re willing, so it must be true, yes?
The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did.
Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision.
The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being.
Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!
I have read that the only sentence mentioning Jesus in Flavius Josephus was faked/added later.
@@rolandvonmalmborg1905 kindly provide the book please or your source. thanks
I would love to share this Documentary to the world. It is a need to be seen Documentary.
Go shivers when the inscription was read, hail Jesus. X
Thank you so much to the previous commenter who directed the readers to another three-part video "The Jesus Tomb Unmasked" by Dr. Craig. Very interesting to me is how, when interviewed again after this video, the professional archeologists, etc. used to promote these suggested conclusions are quite upset with exactly how their findings and original statements were used or misused. Worth watching if you are really unbiased and interested in looking for the truth.
So glad I watched that 3 part video after this documentary. Highly recommended to watch both before picking a side
Probably because the translation they claimed in this video was quickly debunked..........
When they showed the chemical analysis of the bone box patina, the narrator said, "it's a match," not the experts. It didn't look like a match to me, not any closer than the controls they had. The video creators did find some neat stuff, but they made one guess based on another.
Simcha won a libel suite for them saying his research was fake... $250k
@@scottemery4737 you must not have used different types spectroscopy before. Being a biology major having taken organic chemistry and having been the tutor for the nursing chem class at my university, the certain elemental signatures are extremely similar, given that they would not be exactly the same due to a difference of location within the tomb. Each different box will have slight differences in chemical composition, but that there was overlap for each peak is a telling sign that they did come from the same tomb.
I love this documentary. Thank you Simcha for the hard work.
Simcha in Hebrew means joy!
@@qkcmnt1242 Or 'liar'.
So interesting. Thankyou.
At the end, I was sickened by the woman from the IAA who gave no leeway to the importance or significance of the tomb. Just a little power hungry woman who enjoyed throwing her weight around.
Nonetheless, this was a spectacular documentary.
Thank you for sharing..
“Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.”
Matthew 10:32 KJV
Fascinating. Is this tomb still covered today? So many questions still unanswered.
It is all well documented.
Wow impressive such passion, what a courageous discovery with all it's complex meanings and hidden bias, keep your faith and God Bless Yeshuahs family, to Mariam all will be revealed. Much respect for those that toiled in The Spirit of Truth
Very interesting Savior should be respected in every way.
I like the fact that they don’t know so much but they know everything. Tease people make it up as they go!
They determined “Mary Magdalene” and “Jesus” don’t share a mother. Why didn’t they test “Virgin Mary” to compare to “Jesus?” That would be very compelling.
I thought that same thing. Also, why not see if there is DNA in the ossuary of Judah son of Jesus and compare it to Jesus’ and Mary’s DNA?
Wasn’t Mary Magdalene his wife? And on a note I have never thought of. Can you imagine doing the nasty with the Son Of God? Let that sit on your brain and fry for a bit.
@ roo Lenoir ya i cant imagine god or yashua doing anything sexual but i have read odd comments about people wanting to be there eturnal sex slave and other odd things when i read that for first time all i could think is who thinks this way we r supposed to look at god as our heavenly father so why would anyone think anything sexual.... idk just seams very odd to me
@@korn5308 So I said Son of God, I had never thought about that before I said that in my post. ☝️I guess I never thought about Jesus being married and all that goes with it until the very moment I wrote that. Now try to stay with me here. I’m raised Southern Baptist, we don’t like to talk about sex much. ( well my family didn’t) and I was not taught much about Jesus when he was a kid, or as a young adult. So I never even thought about him being a person , I only knew him as more than a human. But he was human. I said what I thought. Up until I read your comment I hadn’t thought about it again.
I have never heard of anyone wanting to be God’s sex slave. That’s weird.
Yea, me thinking” I wonder if Jesus and Mary ( Magdalene ) ever made a baby” is mild compared to what you said. So if you were aiming to make me feel , dirty minded, you failed miserably. If you would like to talk more I’ll be happy to respond.☺️
Have a good day.
Historians never like to challenge new history. They come up with every kind of theory that fits with their belief but not for any new theory/fact. Remember, the history was actually written until 400 years after Jesus' death. By that time it was oral history and we all (should) know a story can be changed by just one word. So, put your thinking caps on .....
Except they had guards guarding the tomb with a huge stone blocking the entrance. Thank you for sharing♥️
That was not the family tomb. The Bible talks about the other tomb. God can do anything. He could cause the guards to sleep, move the stone, remove the body and put it wherever he liked in the blink of an eye.
@@HearturMind I'm waiting he will appear and everyone will accept and follow the same cause without disputes and war. He can do it I'm sure, at least once more!
Yes please. Part 2
Wow! Amazing! Our prescious Lord! That had to be awe inspiring to be in that tomb and to find out the truth of so much. All the things they had to be careful of. So much tragedy that brought so much hope.
Didn't Yeshua ascend to heaven? And didn't Mary say the tomb was empty when she looked for Him?
The collection process of the material found in the ossuaries was done without proper procedures. The collector’s unprotected hands, arms and other exposed surfaces could shed contaminating DNA and would therefore nullify the results. Either a poor collection process documented in the filming or a poor re-creation of the collection process. Still, an interesting documentary. I remember clearly when this discovery was announced. It was spellbinding then and still is now.
I agree and i doubt they would have drug the stone coffin lid but rather picked it up instead..lol
the boxes that were taken from the tomb were already out and about for long time.... at that point is hard to think they were not contaminated already... but I guess what they extracted was not contaminated since it was deep inside the bones.
I feel you might be confusing the extraction of dna from inside bones with analysing dna on surfaces.
@@captnliberty2314 And the analysis was done on the mitochondria which was still intact inside the boxes.
After 2k years, contamination is mythical. Objectivity is to be observed here. Well, belief is another matter - very personalistic.
very good stuff and important...something you never hear about......will the IAA ever let this treasure be fully investigated ??
Simcha your making old fashioned Christians blessed with the truth of our Messiah being found out to truly exist when you found the nails inside the High Priests coffin it was astounding true! Thanks for building up greater faith in Christianity. God bless you and your family Simcha Jacob.
This was a really good doc! I am so sad that they covered the tomb back up without further research. 😢
Frankly, it feels like an anti-climax to me... Why didn't they just follow the thing to the end...? They tested Jesus's and Mariamne's DNA. Why NOT Judah's also...? Just imagine... The possible implications & indications that a +ve result from the Judah's test would bring to Christians all over the world.... It would be heady..!!
Something weird about that... I'm sure they could have returned weeks, months later after getting paperwork and approval. The reason they gave was they didn't want kids to fall in... That's not an excuse as that problem could have been averted a thousand different ways. I wonder if they ever even translated the inscriptions that were on the wall down there... I may have to do some searching elsewhere to see if they ever did return.
The real reason that they covered the tomb up was due to the fact that real research would have exposed the truth. the truth that this was a total fabrication.
The truth is contained in the inspired Word of God. Jesus rose from the dead and ascended up into heaven. He did not continue to live an earthly life!
Just say He did; why is there no further record of His life from that moment on?
Did he simply vanish into obscurity and was never heard of again. No, if he had remained and lived on earth, He would have continued about His Fathers business and continued to proclaim the Gospel. He would have continued teaching, He would have performed many more miracles.
And God's Word would have been a lie, but God cannot lie, He cannot lie, He is incapable of lying. Therefore the Word of God is truth, which means that this documentary and so many like it are all complete fabrications. Whoever believes mere man over God Almighty, is a fool and almost certainly a non-believer.
I fear for your never dying souls from that which is to come; the judgement!
When people throw up huge roadblocks over something that should be explored, it means you're on to something. Think of the money and organizations that would crumble if this were all true. I think many people would stop at nothing to hush this up.
Sounds like a bullshit documentary to me.
Very interesting, but it is produced by a master storyteller, James Cameron. First of all, when Mary and the other women went to the tomb, she was shocked to find it empty and when she went to tell the other disciples "they had moved his body" thr others did not believe her and ran to see for themselves. If the disciples had moved him in secret, they would not have been surprised to find the tomb empty. Secondly, Roman guards were killed for falling asleep while on guard and they had stationed at LEAST 20 to guard his tomb. They ALL fell asleep knowing they would be killed for doing so? I don't think so. How would anyone be able to move that giant stone without waking a single guard? Thirdly, IF the disciples had stolen and moved his body, they'd have known the whole resurrection thing to be a lie. Out of 12 people, I can not see ALL of them sticking to a story they knew was a lie when faced with the horrific deaths they suffered. Stoned? Crucified upside down, sawed in half and other nightmarish deaths? And not even ONE recanted the story? Nope. They all suffered terribly rather than say it was not true. Finally, the bones should have some dried blood inside the bones and it could be tested against the blood of Jesus that was found on the mercy seat to see if it is a match. If it were a match then the blood in the bones would still be alive when reconstituted. So....what IF they really ARE the bones of the Messiah? I think his bone box would have included that title. And yet his bones in a box do not prove he did not rise from the dead. He put aside his Heavenly body to TAKE ON human flesh and bones for a brief period. AFTER the resurrection he would have had no more need for them. He would have taken back up his glorified body. That is why he could just suddenly appear in the upper room through a locked door. And he DID tell Mary, "Do not touch me for I have not yet ascended. Touching him might have killed her, just like touching the Ark of the Covenant killed those who touched it on accident. I am convinced not at all by the tale told in this video.
The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did.
Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision.
The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being.
Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!
True however according to the gospels Jesus allowed Thomas to touch and feel his wounds to know it was him.
Or had he ascended before approaching his other disciples?
Jesus appeared to them in a glorified body. The spirit is more real than what we call real. He still bears the scares and wounds of the cross, even in His glorified body.
@@wawoodsman7198 reading it in the Greek, a better rendering of “ do not touch” would be “ do not clutch”. Jesus had things to do after the resurrection. With Thomas, the Greek can be rendered touch. Two different Greek words are used - one for clutch and one for touch. Cameron is always trying to make Christianity look like a fraud. He is such a tool.
@@Freeman_Actual very good point. I think we only know in part. We all are going to be surprised by things we were taught as in tradition, not truth. ✌🏼
Quite interesting, James Tabor
I was just grateful to be able to watch this tonight for the places it lead me. I too wonder why all the bones were not tested and don't believe that they weren't. I just find it so sad to think, 2000 years and we still have trouble with accepting what's right in front of us.... our hand could be in the wound and we still must doubt? Too much... time for us all to wake up
.... read the book of Jonah.... God speaks to us all at all times... can we hear him? That's the question.... understanding can't even be contemplated until we are willing to hear first...
I agree.
Yes but aren’t we talking about Jesus!
I’m a Catholic and I have zero issues with discovering the tomb of Jesus or his lineage. To me, this would most certainly not change my faith or beliefs.
That said, whether you believe the possibility that this is “The Tomb”, I’m having trouble understanding why the censoring and blocking. If there is a clear opportunity to disprove that this is not what some people claim it is, then what is the problem. Why not allow for further research and investigation? People only hide things when they’re afraid of the truth or of something. When you think about it, there’s actually more serious implications from the scenario that this is actually the real thing, than to the opposite. I would tend to say, especially more for the Church, than for most other Christian sects/denominations. In my personal view, if your faith in Jesus and his teachings is based strictly on the “literal” bible, then you have some serious soul searching to do and this is coming from someone who has engaged in apologetics.
If you were Christian, it would bother you. You're not, so, I get it. Your religion was created by Simon Magus, not Jesus. And Magus was rather less credible and less strict in his methodologies which were passed on to the rest of Universalism over time. Yes, you can do your homework. Universalism was founded by the man cursed by the Apostles with the Anathema in the book of acts. He arrived in Rome ca 42 ad - roughly the time they said for 1700 years Simon Peter had Arrived; but, all the historical data denies Peter being in Rome and proves quite otherwise. Magus, however, was there. He discussed, wrote about and established what he called a 'catholic' (universal) religion. One that combined the belief systems of all religions into one. That's what he was teaching when first encountered, btw, a mishmash of Judaism and pagan beliefs. He was renowned in Rome as a Magician and held the title Petr (priest of the mysteries). He was so well known that the Caesar had a statue erected to him and had him venerated along with the gods of Rome. This is all history. Much of what Catholics call dogma derives directly from the pen of Magus. Indulgences - which had part in causing the reformation - was directly authored by Magus. Interestingly, to understand Christianity is to understand that the Holy Spirit is God. Magus attempted to buy the Holy spirit from the Apostles and this is why he was anathematized. He wanted the magic he saw in his own carnal mind and wanted it. But it boils down to trying to buy God. Not an office. And it's thusly interesting that the founder of the 'catholic' religion, Magus, didn't see it as buying God.. thus the Catholic view of the crime called 'simony' is a crime of attempting to buy an office. It's wrong on the second count as well - in Christianity and 'office' is nothing in and of itself. Message is paramount - which is Why Paul quite rightly stated that if he were to teach anything other than his beginning message, he should be counted as anathema. His office granted literally nothing. And, of course, DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. Go do your historical research on Simon Magus. Well documented. It's just that Catholics - his late followers - are always the last to find out the truth.
@@havoc092 Hmm, last I recall, “protestantism” aka, what you call “Christian” LOL; began with a guy named Martin Luther, who after criticizing the corruption of the Church, turned around and used the local nobility to force his Protestantism on all the peasantry around. See, here’s the thing - you have not been awarded any mandate or declared an arbiter of what Christian faith and belief is or should be. Once you have something intelligent and mildly interesting to say, please let me know. LOL
@@aldridkg No no.. you'll need to do better than that. Protestantism was a protest movement that left Universalism.. nothing to do with Christianity apart from their stated goal to reform to get closer to Christianity. Seems to have largely failed. They married philosophy. Christianity existed right alongside of universalism. It's just that the Universalists attempted to murder anyone who didn't bow to them and then denounce them as heretics while making up pious tales of conquest .. which in this day and age with all the info available has been set back a far piece.
I didn't criticize the corruption of 'the church' either. Universalism isn't 'the church'. And it never has been is what I stated without caviat. I said it because it's a provable fact. What's more, I spent years studying to find out what all the Universalists should have known if they'd done any research at all before adopting. The information has always been there. And while I'm smart, I'm not unique in pointing it out. And as a matter of fact, as a Christian I have something you don't - a priesthood. That does give me the authority and right to speak. You don't have any.. do you. I mean, if you're a universalist (which one assumes at this point) then you will have to admit you have zero authority to speak on behalf of your religion. So why are you? Why are you engaging me when you have no authority offered. If I put a direct question of faith to you .. you can't do anything but give me what they give you to say.. which I can probably quote verbatim to you in the first place and save you the time. I'm stating what anyone willing to do the legwork can find out rather directly for themselves because there is a historical record concerning Simon Petr Magus.. and that was purposed. Everything your relligious group says of Simon the Apostle was true of Magus, not the Apostle - his arrival in Rome. His founding of a religion - namely universalism: the combining of all religions into one. He developed, founded and led his religion from Rome. He was honored by Caesar, not Peter the Apostle but Magus. Magus is the one the statue was erected to. Magus is the one venerated (worshipped) by Rome. Peter the Apostle they wanted nothing to do with. And it wasn't Peter the Apostle that Paul sparred with in Rome.. Paul directly faced down verbally and in print the very dogmatic pronunciations of your founder Magus. Universalism (Latin: Catholicism) Has never been Christian.. ever. Christians, Jews and pagans alike were forced into it at the point of a sword. That is the history. So I'm not your opponent. History is. And History, too, has the authority to speak. Where's yours?
@@aldridkg Finally, and ultimately.. if you want to be a Universalist.. knock yourself out. If you intended to be a Christian instead, go do your homework and, again, knock yourself out. Your soul is your boat to row into eternity. If you want to do it informed or blind - utterly your choice. But the historical record is quite clear on who was and wasn't in Rome. It's clear on the role and life of Magus. It's clear about a lot more things to do about Universalism that you've probably never given a second look before simply adopting what Universalists told you. Your choice; but, Blind acceptance less useful than leaving your fate to the flip of a coin. Both are reckless. I remember being taught how Constantine was a 'Christian' emperor.. utter nonsense.. and how he defended the church by destroying the aryans and the donatists.. not true either.. he exiled Arius and actually preferred the arians - attempting to talk the part of early leaders that bothered to show at Nicea into changing scripture to make Arianism non-heretical. The Donatists, whome early Universalists beseached the emperor to murder, were merely chased out of Roman territory and outlived the Roman empire with a perfectly proper and orthodox statment of Christian faith. When they turn up non heretics with orthodox Christian testimony.. that is a problem for Universalism - not donatists. Their crime was pointing out the heresy of some in the Christian church of having turned in their texts to the emperor and then pay tithes to the Roman gods. For that, the universalists wanted them murdered. And thankfully, that failed. All a matter of history.. it just takes wanting to know and doing the research.. and not all that difficult to do.
@@havoc092 My initial post made it quite clear that my faith is not dependent on a literal interpretation of the Bible or any writings for that matter. Hence, I’m not certain how you extrapolate my statement to mean blind acceptance or flip of a coin...
As for the rest of your diatribe, it sounds like something right of blog from a conspiracy site. Clearly, nothing meriting any serious engagement.
To reiterate, please let me know when you have something intelligent to say.
They need to put all this on a program on tv. Maybe by doing that it would make a better and more of a loving world.
Channel 4 is British tv
Come on Brad... we see it today, because it was on TV.
exactly! a Tomb found with an Estuary saying "Jesus son of Joseph" AND "Maria," AND "Jose" AND Marianme" as Philip spelled it?! this is fascinating. and i never heard of it.. just stumbled upon it.
This is great..!
I love to watch it..!
It give me more knowledge and insight..!
Thank you for sharing this great work..!
Big love from Java, Indonesia..
❤😇🇮🇩
How sad that they buried and built over the tomb. Sometimes people are so dumb!
But they didn't. Didn't you watch it??
The disciples were so convinced of Jesus's resurrection that they were eager to risk their life right after that point.
Absolutely, no man would have died to tell the Gospel alone, they had the Holy Spirit guiding them,all the way to their death.
Thank for you short and simple comment . You hit the nail right on the head . If Jesus did not die on that cross and resurrect three days later as the scriptures tell us , then the disciples would have known that . However as you stated they were so convinced of who he was after the resurrection they went out boldly preaching the the gospel knowing they would die for it and were willing to do so for they had seen the risen Lord who was dead but now alive . Great comment you made thank you so much .
Previous explanations in this video suggest that at least several of these names were NOT common names. Am I missing something? Also, did anyone look to the bones of the box labeled 'Jesus...' for any indication of damage to the ankle/wrist bones for signs of crucifixion?
just a hoax trying to prove Jesus is nothing but a man , this is not scientific , where are the texts of the historians that wrote about Jesus for comparison ? touching bones without protection to prevent contamination , why Aramean insciptions not Hebrew ? if followers of Jesus were considered enemies why declare themselves through their burial ? the only scientific done here is the trial to collect DNA based on names by directly considering that this is it we found the Jesus and his family without any consideration of what i just typed , where are other tombs that had the Christian symbol upside down v comparing to Hebrew and Jewish tombs entrences , are Jewish and Hebrew ossuaries scibed in Aramean or Hebrew ? where are the comparisons . Got to be either fanatic or symple minded to consider any truth in this other than desperate to prove Jesus is just a man and finally in their own Jewish History why and what was written why they crusified Jesus for comparison what the Christian churches claim
occam's razor! The truth is, if there were this much data on any other family lineage, it would be generally accepted. Because it's Jesus of Nazareth, it's just too hard for some to believe. I mean think about how unbelievably coincidental this would have to be if not!
The most important discovery ever and we dance around the testing and escavation sight. The bones should have been tested. However, that may be too dangerous to put on the documentary. I think the area should be considered as holy. God bless the man that protects the ignorant. I love Jesuah forever.
If it were Christ's grave there would be no bones as he rose three days after being entombed
@@diychad7268 Yes, he could’ve risen in spirit. I mean you’re reading from a book that was authored by what is believed to be 4 different writers, written hundreds of years after the Crucifixion and which was edited and re-edited for hundreds of years after. Not to mention had books removed from it all together. The measure of one’s faith should be spiritual and not textual.
It has always concerned me that from the start the roman catholicfaith seem to put more accent on the mother of Jesus, not the man himself on which the faith of christian people is based.
Why when he is the son of God first and formost.
The other thing that is strage is that there is son of Joseph on just one box but not on any of the others?
@@johnlaccohee-joslin4477 I’m not really sure what you mean. What exactly are you basing that on?
@@diychad7268 I have always believed that Jesus and his resurrection story was not able to be written as it really was a spiritual awakening for Jesus and his immediate followers. Jesus was more evolved than they were and they could not understand what was actually occuring as Jesus ascended his body. Only Jesus understood what it was to be the son of God. His followers were not in that state of conscuousness and could not write about it accurately. I thought this was an amazing documentary. James Cameron did an excellent job.
Simcha inspires so many people with his love of lol, Naked Archeology. In my case the inspiration has taken the form of Egyptian hieroglyphics, of which I'm now learning to read.
Found it on Craigslist as the only “like-new early 1st century B.C. tomb, unoccupied since the first tenant prematurely ended eternal lease after only three days”
Do you have a link or a reference to the archaeological paper? I would like to read up on it?.
It's concerning that regardless of archeology unearthing and disrupting the rested comes with a heaviness of burden...not only disrespectful but disturbing an individuals peace after the life they lived is morally and spiritually unsettling
So, the followers of Jesus claimed he was raised form the dead. No longer in that grave. But! They left his body in the tomb with his name on it. Uh, I don't think so. Skepticism is healthy if you don't mix it with ignorance. Saying they would've undermined their own scam is ignorant. Even the religious leaders in that story were smart enough figure that out when they asked for guards to be posted at the tomb in case they tried steal the body. Come on man!
Yes, we do claim Jesus rose from the dead . No longer in the tomb. I don’t claim to know the mind of God, not his sons mind either. I just believe.
I do enjoy talking about Jesus , God, history, Egypt , England, kings,queens, I’d like to learn more about Buda , and masons ( not the Masons of today but masons that built things in history. ) I’m missing something there but I don’t know what. I also really need to know what the standing stones are about. Also are the “ great men” in the Bible children of angels and women? And are those children hero’s like Achilles, Goliath and Sampson? If witches and magic aren’t real then how come we aren’t supposed to suffer a witch to live? Is there a difference between the witches then and now? If they practiced herbal medicine why on earth would that piss God off that bad? Who did all the work on Petra ? Where is the book of Enoch and why’s it bad? I know I have more questions , I can’t really think of them right now.
@WinGate Mose I understand your knee jerk reaction but we are called to be Bereans and to study to show ourselves approved. The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did.
Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision.
The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being.
Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!
Was It Not A Common Custom Of This Time Period That The Widow Was To Marry A Brother If No Children Were Born Of The Previous Marriage??
Even As I Was Writing My Question I Had A STRONG SENSE OF BEING IN THE WRONG FOR THINKING….. I DON’T THINK THAT JESUS WAS EVER MARRIED!!!!! HE WAS SENT HERE BY GOD HIS FATHER TO BE CRUCIFIED FOR ALL SINS, TO DEFEAT satan BY DEFEATING Death(Which IS ONE OF The devil’s names) & JESUS CHRIST WAS RISEN FROM THE TOMB ON THE THIRD DAY!!!!!!!
I LOVE YOU GOD & JESUS CHRIST ETERNALLY!!!!!!!
And the documentary was trying so hard to reinstate that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. Duh
Fast forward to 24:20 to get a synopsis of everything they put before it. In essence "hogwash".
Awesome incredible and very Amazing Stories The True answers are Blowing in the Wind.
The big part of this Documentary is that pretty much all of the Experts in this Documentary have come out publicly and said that what they said in this film was twisted to seem like they actually had proof that this was Jesus family's tomb, they also said they would never do a other dig and or work with these people ever again, they said every thing they said was twisted and or edited to paint a unrealistic View on this tomb, I encourage people to do some more research on this and how it was pretty much a sham documentary, And how those names were pretty much the main names used in those times, like Andrew was in the 80s.