This man reminds me of my best days of college. When a smart person just took the time to explain a topic. He doesn’t just give the facts, but the context that makes them history. Amazing lectures
I had a teacher like this in 2nd grade that was big on history And sparked my interest in history ever since . I was a bad student my whole life but My grades were all Ds and Fs Except for history class I always had an A God bless students of history
God bless Dr. Roy Casagranda !!! MashaAllah I love how he brings forward his knowledge in such a captivating manner. It feels like Im listening to a story rather than watching a classroom lecture. Please upload more !! Jazak Allah khayr Dr. Roy (May God rewards you for this beautiful impact)
@@anthonykelly1649 what 3 deities? Allah means The God in Arabic language. But still wondering where you saw a third one. And what makes you think its an atheist perspective? Dr Roy never mentioned in this lecture that this universe (a creation) doesn't have a creator (Allah). Sure he mentioned the Mexicans gods but hes just narrating what was their beliefs.
@@tamayaytam It never hurts to wish anyone blessings. I also never mentioned what my religion is, i just spoke in my native language, although if I had said "God bless you" which is the same thing but in English im pretty sure you would've scrolled over my comment. And why do you have to hate and lecture me? Cant I say what I want? Damn, im just wishing someone good things, im not promoting hate like you against Arabic and Islam. And no Islam doesnt need advertising Alhamdulillah there is over 1.5 billion Muslim in this word and InshaAllah this number will only keep growing. Anyways ignorants will always be hating instead of learning. I see you are Turkish. I pray for the people of Turkiye and may Allah grant Jannah to everyone that died from the earthquake and may Allah protect everyone alive. I hope your loved ones are safe and healthy.
@breezeanonymous6034 I find it fascinating that we have something in common to talk about from the other side of the world and would never even know it. Better question is why would anyone care that you don't care?? 🤡
i care, he's on the other side of the world and studies a completely different profession, which is a testament to how good the teacher is. I'm watching from Colorado and work construction. @@breezeanonymous6034
I wanna go to Austin one day to fill one of those empty chairs. Professor Roy you've been a beacon of truth and a real influencer in my life. Thank you.
You can always count on Dr. Casagranda to make it engaging and interesting. You can tell he's passionate about everything he teaches and that this is not just a job to him.
My goodness Dr Casagranda. I am so fortunate to be one of the first few to be listening to your new topic. You are a walking talking encyclopedia and your storytelling style captures my imagination every time I listen to you. Keep up the amazing work. All the best.
Yes! Another talk by Professor Casagranda!!!!! Please please please keep these talks coming! ❤from 🇬🇧 P.S. loving the new subject and the hairstyle Professor 😁
I sure hope he talks about China, Harappa and Egyptian history. I wonder how he can talk for hours without any script, his memory must be like micro soft/computer.
@@sonarbangla8711 Harappa is a great topic! Maybe he could explore South Asian history, covering the lives of Tipu Sultan and how the British took over the country during the time of the British East India Company
@@Ismail-Yahya Roy wants to break open the knots that is central to south Asia, like the Arian-Dravidian/Harappan script and such knots, then he surely will dig deep into the mysteries of the topic.
I literally saved this the moment it came out to listen to while at work…and I have to say, it’s given me life. Thank you so much Professor, you lectures never disappoint…if school kids had you as a teacher there’d be more history graduates than accountants 😂
I feel like I’m in college again. Watching a human being talk so passionately about history. The amount of context made this lecture that much valuable. As a Mexican, it feels good to know a little more about this part of Mexico’s history.
I'm Mexican (living in Mexico City); I love to read about my country's history and I know a lot about it. Dr. Casagranda's description of the treatment of prisoners of war by the Aztecs is pure fiction.
@@crunchtimewalkthroughs2141 Check the books of Miguel de Leon Portilla, a Mexican anthropologist and one of the greatest experts in Aztec/Mexica culture. You could also read Fray Bernardino de Sahagún (a Spanish missionary from the time of the conquest) it's extremely interesting. He learned to speak Nahuatl (the Aztec language), transcribing a lot of the ancient customs and traditions. He also captured the Indigenous people's perspective on the conquest.
Being Mexican, I’ve always been fascinated with the history of the Americas. Especially since it’s not covered in public schools. Great lecture. Lots to think about.
It appears there is some argument over whether Aztec weapons were designed to kill or merely to maim enemies in order to capture them. However, I’m not able to find ANY references that say the Aztecs went into battle unarmed and just wrestled the other side to the ground. There is TONS of information on the diverse weapons of the Aztecs to include TONS of Aztec art with soldiers carrying weapons.
It’s because it’s untrue. Aztecs fought battles with weapons with the intention of killing. They used a variety of battle field strategies including complex ones like feigned retreat, and they were organized in ordered professional matter. Cassandra’s account of unarmed wrestling is baffling. And people are unfortunately misled being needlessly. Beware lectures who speak on topics they are not experts in and/or who do not regularly offer references.
There’s so much incorrect information here I don’t even know where to begin. But for starters, if you don’t know a statistic, don’t pull one out of your ass. In reference to 3:05 30% of Spanish words do not come from Arabic. The correct percentage is 8%. That’s for the entirety of the Spanish lexicon; in terms of how often those words are used, the percentage gets smaller. The original pronunciation of Mexico was not with that throaty kh sound it was a sh sound, like the English sh in show. In Nahuatl, Mexico was pronounced Me-shee-ko, and in 15th century Spanish, the a letter X represented a sh sound, not a kh sound. Names like Xavier were not only written with an X, but pronounced Shavier. Over time, the sh sound moved further back in the mouth and because the modern kh sound, and the Spanish royal academy decreed that words that were spelled with an X but that made a kh sound would now be spelled with a J, so names like Xavier became Javier, exército became ejército, exemplo became ejemplo, Don Quixote became Don Quijote. BUT, some place names, like Mexico, which underwent the same pronunciation change that changed it from Meshiko in the 1500s to Mekhico in the 1700s, retained the old, now obsolete spelling. Why did the X when making a kh sound get replaced with a J? Because the J in the 1500s made the exact same sh sound as the X, and when the sh turned into a kh, it did so for both words spelled with X like exército and words spelled with a J, like Jesús. So yes, in the 1500s, Jesús in Spanish was pronounced Shesús. So the Spanish Royal Academy decided to make a rule that this new kh sound sound be represented by a J for all words, regardless of their historical spelling.
While the direct borrowing of Arabic words is the most quantifiable aspect of influence, Arabic’s impact on Spanish extends into stylistic, grammatical, and phonological dimensions. This subtle shaping of the language’s structure and cultural expressions might contribute to a broader, less tangible sense of Arabic influence, which could explain the perception of a higher percentage of influence than direct vocabulary alone would suggest.
Indigeneous medicine still exists. We knew that chewing willow bark would actually get rid of a headache. Scientifically I believe it has a compound like aspirin, so you weren't off the mark. You're an AWESOME teacher. I'm learning so many facts. Thank you
This man has a gift and has a talent for communicating information. I never knew how difficult "slash and burn" was as an agricultural technique. No one ever explained it like that to me before, and I studied history as an undergrad.
This guy makes me rethink social media, incredible how we can waste our time with kids or even grown up people vomiting non content, but at same time gives us oportunity to have master class like this. Im redoing my floor while hearing this. Brilliant. Thank you so much
1) The way he describes the creation of the 5 Suns throws into question his expertise in this topic. There are some descriptions that He brings up that I have never heard before. The First sun was Tezcatlipoca's sun. It was a half sun that provided little light, and was knocked from the sky by Quetzalcoatl (Which he confuses for Huītzilōpōchtli). Their rivalry is fairly well known. In a rage, Tezcatlipoca sends jaguars to destroy the sun and eat up the Giants that Quetzalcoatl created. This sun is known as the Jaguar Sun because of the way the earth was destroyed. Wind Sun was next and was created by Quetzalcoatl. This version of man abandoned their gods and Tezcatlipoca turned them into Monkeys. Quetzalcoatl destroyed the Sun in grief with a Hurricane and dedicated himself to creating a better type of human. Fire Sun belonged to Tlaloc. He was a good sun, until Tezcatlipoca stole his wife. In grief, Tlaloc neglected his duties to bring rain to the earth. when the people begged for rain, he destroyed the world and sun in a rain of fire. Water Sun was Chalchiuhtlicue's. She was a good sun as well, but Tezcatlipoca told her that her kindness came from a selfish desire to be loved, and that all humanity believed his words. She cried blood until the world was overtaken by water and drowned everybody. A small group of humans were turned into fish to survive. The Fifth Sun has two main stories. The one he told says that Nanauatzin and Tecuciztecatl were chosen as candidates when in every story i have read, they volunteered to become the sun. Tecuciztecatl was chosen by the other gods but was a coward and did not want to jump in the flame. Nanauatzin jumped in as soon as Tecuciztecatl bowed out. In shame, Tecuciztecatl jumped in after Nanauatzin. Nanauatzin sun rose first, splendid and radiant, especially compared to his sore ridden body. When Tecuciztecatl's Sun rose it was bright as well, but the gods did not see it right that He was as splendid as he was given his cowardice and they threw a rabbit at him to dim his sun. (I dont recall the gods beating Tecuciztecatl at any point but there are many variations in the story, this may be one i have missed). I do not understand how he completely avoids mentioning Tonatiuh's role in this story. It was Tonatiuh that would not move the sun and demanded sacrifice from all the other gods to move it across the sky. He is so much of an important god in this equation that he sits dead center in the Aztec Calendar and exist on Mexico's money to this day. He is one of the reasons that Huītzilōpōchtli is so important as a war god and a sun god. Without war bringing in sacrificial victims, the sun would not rise. I have only gotten an hour into the lecture, but missing parts of the story or rewriting them and avoiding major players is a big red flag to me. This is probably the most important story for the Mexica People.
2) The Culhuacan Princess that was flayed was a sacrificial vicitm to Huītzilōpōchtli to make her his wife by most accounts I have read. Xipe Totec i saw brought up in wikipedia. I have not read the source, but i would not doubt there are variations in the story. As far as I know, the consensus is that the woman was Sacrificed to Huītzilōpōchtli to be his bride
3) I believe the Nahuatl Pronunciation of Mexica is (Me-Shee-Ca). X's in words sound like (SH) for the most part in Nahuatl regardless of position in the word. the diatribe about Spain wanting to take Arabic out of Spanish doesn't make sense in this lecture, and he continues to use the wrong pronunciation of Mexica throughout the rest of this lecture because of the Arabic/Spanish history he added to it. Edit: Texcoco is Pronounced (Te-sh-co-co) The "SH" pronunciation of "X" is mentioned in the book in the description
4) I have never heard it said that killing in warfare was Immoral to the Aztecs. There were 2 forms of warfare; Conquest and Capture In conquest, the Aztecs were formidable Killers. No, they did not enter battle unarmed. For Capture (known as Flowery Wars), they did not go into battle unarmed. they used clubs to incapacitate. Even the Macuahuitl (Aztec Sword) was used to capture sacrificial victims, using the flat or cutting strategically. Most one on one encounters were for higher level warriors that were deemed valuable Sacrifice victims. in these cases, warriors stalked the field, chose a victim and hunted him down. a priest would take the defeated warrior and tie them up to move them off the battle field. I dont know where the notion that the mexica went into battle unarmed and would only wrestle victims to submission comes form. This is in the book in the description.
5) Roy, We can be disgusted with Cannibalism and the European War Crimes. Telling people that object to shut up about it is quite bizarre, equating the two is quite bizarre. The Mexica committed many atrocities that they considered to be justified because of how they believed the universe functioned. Are people not allowed to believe that? The barbarism that existed in Europe (Religious Wars, Wars for Power, the Spanish Inquisition, Capital Punishment) were all also justified by the people committing them. Can we not just agree that both were pretty darn awful? or at least agree that Cannibalism is another step ahead of the brutalities of war that exist across the board?
The idea that Cannibalism was implemented as a protein source for the empire is debated intensely. The Mexica people hunted, fished, and domesticated turkeys. There were many Meat Protein sources, as well as plant based protein sources such as beans. It is near consensus that Consumption of human meant was for ritualistic purposes, and commoners were not allowed to partake. To try to justify the act of Cannibalism and call it ethical is mind boggling to me, especially because the debate around it is so big, you dont have to bite that bullet. This is mentioned in the book in the description.
Hi this Prof amazing what a fantastic lecturer his depth of research and knowledge has to be the best I have seen so far the cherry on the top is his way of presentation keep it up prof. I tried to find your full clip on the 6 gospels but couldn't has it been uploaded
Although I initially enjoyed this lecture, I’m a bit concerned about inaccuracies. As others have noted, it seems that certain stories have no source or solid basis. Is there any source for how each prisoner of war lived as a “shadow” to their captor for an entire year? Also it’s hard to believe that Aztecs would never use any weapons in warfare especially when conquering nearby cities. I’d love to enjoy more of this professors lectures but the inaccuracies make me worried.
The prisoner of war part is pretty well documented by Spanish and Mexica accounts. In Bernal Diaz book, they claimed that they freed Mexica captives, and virtually all captives refused to escape as they were always nobles and would suffer complete loss of any social standing for themselves and their family for their cowardice after having lost in what they considered a fair fight. This is due in part as human sacrifices was practiced by the whole area and isn’t reviled as many UA-camr videos mistakenly believe. Mexica were hated for other reasons. In fact, it is believed that they did not practice human sacrificing until arriving in the area, as it was widely practiced long before their arrival. Also, yeah, the supposed focus on only capturing captives IMO sounds too illogical to be true. I can see it being a focus for nobles, but it’s silly to believe that the Mexica wasn’t focused on defeating their enemy into submission, however that was done.
Great lecture by Dr. Gasagranda. I think around 1:15:00, there is something relevant to add. The Mexica ("aztecs") had a type of armor called ichcahuīpīlli, "escapil" in Spanish. It is densely packed, unspun cotton stitched between two layers of fabric and could stop arrows, darts and even musket shots.
They weren't exactly drinking "cocoa", clarification is needed here. They made a very thick drink with it that resembles today's atole, and they believed it to have properties to heal. I feel like there are several points he could've clarified or further expand, it feels a bit misleading at points.
Good story teller. I hope he informs his students that he is presenting his version of history as seen through his eyes and not recorded facts. Great lecturer.
Before we get into this, may I ask…what percentage of likelihood is there that Arabic, & Germanic influence came to the Americas (specifically South America) before history credits the Portuguese officially doing so? 6:46
hello, professor! I'm hoping this message gets to you. I noticed you removed the lectures on "us government summer class" on youtube, I was wondering if there's any way in which I can please have access to those recordings? even if it is for a short time, I'll be diligent in finishing it. Thank you!!!
Love this channel, found it via TikTok and can’t get enough of his lectures
same
Same same. Incredible lectures
Me too
Same. Came here to say this. His lectures are addictive!
Same
This man reminds me of my best days of college. When a smart person just took the time to explain a topic. He doesn’t just give the facts, but the context that makes them history. Amazing lectures
Check out Heather Cox Richardson.. love her lectures and have learned so much.
It’s almost like he loves his job and is really fascinated by the history and culture that he is keeping alive by his story telling
He doesn’t just give you the facts. He makes up a lot of BS too
Great explanation
Agree! My professor like him at UT in the 80s was Brian Levak (History). I'm sure there are some lectures out here in UA-cam land 😉👊
This man thinks im learning something, but im actually enjoying this lecture. This is better than Netflix for me.
Imagine if learning were fun, how powerful and capable could you become?
"Russians doing human waves in Ukraine" 🤡- either he is a illiterate, or he is lying for purpose/propaganda.
Yeah...that is learning
Learning is meant to be enjoyable - so the professor is successful.
This is what exactly happens to me 😅
It’s always a good day when prof. Roy uploads a lecture, haircut is awesome too.
I miss the long hair tho 😢
Need more frequent lectures.
Fr he’s looking fresh 😈😈😈
can't be too straight.
@@MotuBiral Not me, his hair looks SO much better now than when it was just shaggy.
This video is the reason I love being an adult. Listening to a topic no one is forcing me to learn
I am 1000% impressed with your ability to recall names.
Too bad he has zero clue about correct pronunciation of Nahutl. This guy is mostly full of shit.
I had a teacher like this in 2nd grade that was big on history
And sparked my interest in history ever since .
I was a bad student my whole life but
My grades were all Ds and Fs
Except for history class I always had an A
God bless students of history
God bless Dr. Roy Casagranda !!! MashaAllah I love how he brings forward his knowledge in such a captivating manner. It feels like Im listening to a story rather than watching a classroom lecture. Please upload more !! Jazak Allah khayr Dr. Roy (May God rewards you for this beautiful impact)
it's ironic how you mention deities 3 times when recommending an atheist's perpesctive
@@anthonykelly1649 what 3 deities? Allah means The God in Arabic language. But still wondering where you saw a third one. And what makes you think its an atheist perspective? Dr Roy never mentioned in this lecture that this universe (a creation) doesn't have a creator (Allah). Sure he mentioned the Mexicans gods but hes just narrating what was their beliefs.
Why do you always have to bring up your God when you speak? Does your religion need advertising? Just say good and informative lecture and beat it.
@@tamayaytam It never hurts to wish anyone blessings. I also never mentioned what my religion is, i just spoke in my native language, although if I had said "God bless you" which is the same thing but in English im pretty sure you would've scrolled over my comment. And why do you have to hate and lecture me? Cant I say what I want? Damn, im just wishing someone good things, im not promoting hate like you against Arabic and Islam. And no Islam doesnt need advertising Alhamdulillah there is over 1.5 billion Muslim in this word and InshaAllah this number will only keep growing. Anyways ignorants will always be hating instead of learning.
I see you are Turkish. I pray for the people of Turkiye and may Allah grant Jannah to everyone that died from the earthquake and may Allah protect everyone alive. I hope your loved ones are safe and healthy.
@@tamayaytam Why do you always have to comment? Do you need self advertising and attention so badly? Just scroll and ignore the post and beat it.
He is a dream teacher.Watching his lectures for last 4 years. I'm from India, an electrical engineer.
Do you think anyone on UA-cam cares if you are electrical engineer from somewhere? Lol
@breezeanonymous6034 I find it fascinating that we have something in common to talk about from the other side of the world and would never even know it. Better question is why would anyone care that you don't care?? 🤡
i care, he's on the other side of the world and studies a completely different profession, which is a testament to how good the teacher is. I'm watching from Colorado and work construction. @@breezeanonymous6034
Where can i find more of his lectures in full?
@@benbyrd4513 youtube.com/@TheAustinSchool?si=YQbprOUVMCKYJDt0
The day TikTok or UA-cam knows about Prof Roy his videos will garner millions of views for the next 20 years.
TikTok has found it, it’s begun
I came here from tiktok😂
I came from tiktok
I wanna go to Austin one day to fill one of those empty chairs. Professor Roy you've been a beacon of truth and a real influencer in my life. Thank you.
Totally feel the same!
Can’t freaking believe that I was intrigued, captivated and hooked on this lecture. I seen the entire video without interruption. This was fantastic
You can always count on Dr. Casagranda to make it engaging and interesting. You can tell he's passionate about everything he teaches and that this is not just a job to him.
Better sense of humour then from majority of top tier standup comedians, on top of honesty and great knowledge.thank you for uploading
I could listen to this guy explain paint drying and I would still be captivated by his story telling abilities
King Big House Addict! Illegal!
I wish I had a professor as amazing as him ! I watch a lot of his lectures, very well spoken teachings. Thank you for your Great Work !
You are a library of knowledge. It's a privilege to be able to have access to it.
My goodness Dr Casagranda. I am so fortunate to be one of the first few to be listening to your new topic. You are a walking talking encyclopedia and your storytelling style captures my imagination every time I listen to you. Keep up the amazing work. All the best.
Amazing, i'll never forget this lecture - even though my degree was in Spanish & Portuguese, I learnt tons from and I am very grateful. God bless you.
I m from Morocco and I would travel all the way to the US to attend to doctor Casagranda
One of the best professors on earth . Thank you for teaching us more than of our doctors during university!
Absolutely love Dr Roy's lectures. He brings history alive.
Yes! Another talk by Professor Casagranda!!!!! Please please please keep these talks coming! ❤from 🇬🇧
P.S. loving the new subject and the hairstyle Professor 😁
I sure hope he talks about China, Harappa and Egyptian history. I wonder how he can talk for hours without any script, his memory must be like micro soft/computer.
@@sonarbangla8711 Harappa is a great topic! Maybe he could explore South Asian history, covering the lives of Tipu Sultan and how the British took over the country during the time of the British East India Company
@@Ismail-Yahya Roy wants to break open the knots that is central to south Asia, like the Arian-Dravidian/Harappan script and such knots, then he surely will dig deep into the mysteries of the topic.
I could listen to you speak all day long! Love your passion for history and knowledge!
I literally saved this the moment it came out to listen to while at work…and I have to say, it’s given me life. Thank you so much Professor, you lectures never disappoint…if school kids had you as a teacher there’d be more history graduates than accountants 😂
This guy is my new best lecturer,l
I love his Enthusiasm when he tells the stories.
I feel like I’m in college again. Watching a human being talk so passionately about history. The amount of context made this lecture that much valuable. As a Mexican, it feels good to know a little more about this part of Mexico’s history.
I'm Mexican (living in Mexico City); I love to read about my country's history and I know a lot about it. Dr. Casagranda's description of the treatment of prisoners of war by the Aztecs is pure fiction.
Can you recommend any books on this topic?
@@crunchtimewalkthroughs2141 Check the books of Miguel de Leon Portilla, a Mexican anthropologist and one of the greatest experts in Aztec/Mexica culture. You could also read Fray Bernardino de Sahagún (a Spanish missionary from the time of the conquest) it's extremely interesting. He learned to speak Nahuatl (the Aztec language), transcribing a lot of the ancient customs and traditions. He also captured the Indigenous people's perspective on the conquest.
@@sv9818 wow, that all sounds very interesting. Thank you for giving such great sources!
I´m spanish, and i agree, this man is a Hollywood liar. He presents the story in a very interesting but unrealistic way.
Lamentablemente lo que escuchamos es totalmente cierto, los Mexicas eran antropófagos
Thank you Dr. Casagranda for this intellectual fireworks. Your lectures are so tremendously valuable and inspiring.
YES ANOTHER LECTURE! thank you. please upload more if possible. all your work is much appreciated (all involved in this austin school)
Thank you Proffesor. you Make me aspire to be a History Proffesor like you.
he genuinely loves world history and im binging on everything i can find on him.
Best teacher ever such an amazing story telling gift ! Much respect from jordan 🇯🇴🇯🇴
I have been binge watching doc….more please. Excellent imagery of history. Doc gives narratives to forgotten past. More!!!!!
Always looking forward to new lectures by dr. Casangrada.
Thank you, Dr. Roy Casagranda, what a marvelous approach to ancient (and current) history. I'm all in,
Roy Casagranda is absolutely jaw dropping incredible. As a kid who thought about becoming a history professor, YOU ARE MY HERO
Being Mexican, I’ve always been fascinated with the history of the Americas. Especially since it’s not covered in public schools. Great lecture. Lots to think about.
I love this guy!! Thank u for all the teaching
Its so helpful that this guys voice is not annoying
I enjoy your lectures. We don’t always agree, but that is why I watch your videos. You challenge my thoughts and beliefs.
I always enjoy listening to the professor i cant wait till you post up the 1st part of the 4 part lecture you did last year
I can listen to Dr. Roy Casagranda all day never a dull moment.
This notification brought a smile to my face. Waiting for part 2!
Got addicted to listening to this Dr.
I love these lectures so much. I wish I’d had a professor like this in college. Thank you for these!
It appears there is some argument over whether Aztec weapons were designed to kill or merely to maim enemies in order to capture them. However, I’m not able to find ANY references that say the Aztecs went into battle unarmed and just wrestled the other side to the ground. There is TONS of information on the diverse weapons of the Aztecs to include TONS of Aztec art with soldiers carrying weapons.
It’s because it’s untrue. Aztecs fought battles with weapons with the intention of killing. They used a variety of battle field strategies including complex ones like feigned retreat, and they were organized in ordered professional matter. Cassandra’s account of unarmed wrestling is baffling. And people are unfortunately misled being needlessly. Beware lectures who speak on topics they are not experts in and/or who do not regularly offer references.
@@titoburritoisthebestcommun6738 well said
Just found this guy. THANK YOU Dr.Roy, i love you
I would go back to school if all the lectures were even close to this interesting.
Lol this “lecture” is mostly bullshit… you’d learn more from doing your own research for 15 minutes…
There’s so much incorrect information here I don’t even know where to begin. But for starters, if you don’t know a statistic, don’t pull one out of your ass. In reference to 3:05 30% of Spanish words do not come from Arabic. The correct percentage is 8%. That’s for the entirety of the Spanish lexicon; in terms of how often those words are used, the percentage gets smaller. The original pronunciation of Mexico was not with that throaty kh sound it was a sh sound, like the English sh in show. In Nahuatl, Mexico was pronounced Me-shee-ko, and in 15th century Spanish, the a letter X represented a sh sound, not a kh sound. Names like Xavier were not only written with an X, but pronounced Shavier. Over time, the sh sound moved further back in the mouth and because the modern kh sound, and the Spanish royal academy decreed that words that were spelled with an X but that made a kh sound would now be spelled with a J, so names like Xavier became Javier, exército became ejército, exemplo became ejemplo, Don Quixote became Don Quijote. BUT, some place names, like Mexico, which underwent the same pronunciation change that changed it from Meshiko in the 1500s to Mekhico in the 1700s, retained the old, now obsolete spelling.
Why did the X when making a kh sound get replaced with a J? Because the J in the 1500s made the exact same sh sound as the X, and when the sh turned into a kh, it did so for both words spelled with X like exército and words spelled with a J, like Jesús. So yes, in the 1500s, Jesús in Spanish was pronounced Shesús. So the Spanish Royal Academy decided to make a rule that this new kh sound sound be represented by a J for all words, regardless of their historical spelling.
Dude just made shit up and thought no one would notice? Like damn bro we have google….
While the direct borrowing of Arabic words is the most quantifiable aspect of influence, Arabic’s impact on Spanish extends into stylistic, grammatical, and phonological dimensions. This subtle shaping of the language’s structure and cultural expressions might contribute to a broader, less tangible sense of Arabic influence, which could explain the perception of a higher percentage of influence than direct vocabulary alone would suggest.
All his lectures are addictive.
Indigeneous medicine still exists. We knew that chewing willow bark would actually get rid of a headache. Scientifically I believe it has a compound like aspirin, so you weren't off the mark. You're an AWESOME teacher. I'm learning so many facts. Thank you
The great thing here, that it’s only Part 1... can’t wait 😊
This man has a gift and has a talent for communicating information. I never knew how difficult "slash and burn" was as an agricultural technique. No one ever explained it like that to me before, and I studied history as an undergrad.
Thank you so much Dr. Roy!
Yessss please do a part 2 however long it takes! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Thanks!
Brilliant! Such a fun way to learn with such professor
Would love if Dr Roy would do more lectures on prehistory.
Most of his stuff is misinformation....
I couldn’t believe that I saw this I love the story telling of this guy
Amazing lecture! Who would have guessed the “savages” were not as savage as we were taught in public schools compared to the “righteous”
He tries to punch up in every lecture so 10 to 15 percent take with a grain of salt
Aztecs were indeed savages. This guy is trying too hard to paint them as some kind of enlightened society.
As always, an absolute treat!
I could literally listen to this guy all day. Fantastic, would recommend. 14/10
finally! the moment i've been waiting for! cant wait for part2
How do we get more Dr. Roy in our lives??
Thank you for that information. I can’t wait for part 2.
This guy makes me rethink social media, incredible how we can waste our time with kids or even grown up people vomiting non content, but at same time gives us oportunity to have master class like this. Im redoing my floor while hearing this. Brilliant. Thank you so much
This lecture was absolutely incredible!
Reporting from Malaysia thank you for the lecture prof!
Roy-former student here. Glad to see you're blowing up. One small note: it's pronounced Meshika, not Mehika.
Amazing! I wish references were shared. I have been doing research for years and I am very thirsty for sources. Great work!
1)
The way he describes the creation of the 5 Suns throws into question his expertise in this topic. There are some descriptions that He brings up that I have never heard before.
The First sun was Tezcatlipoca's sun. It was a half sun that provided little light, and was knocked from the sky by Quetzalcoatl (Which he confuses for Huītzilōpōchtli). Their rivalry is fairly well known. In a rage, Tezcatlipoca sends jaguars to destroy the sun and eat up the Giants that Quetzalcoatl created. This sun is known as the Jaguar Sun because of the way the earth was destroyed.
Wind Sun was next and was created by Quetzalcoatl. This version of man abandoned their gods and Tezcatlipoca turned them into Monkeys. Quetzalcoatl destroyed the Sun in grief with a Hurricane and dedicated himself to creating a better type of human.
Fire Sun belonged to Tlaloc. He was a good sun, until Tezcatlipoca stole his wife. In grief, Tlaloc neglected his duties to bring rain to the earth. when the people begged for rain, he destroyed the world and sun in a rain of fire.
Water Sun was Chalchiuhtlicue's. She was a good sun as well, but Tezcatlipoca told her that her kindness came from a selfish desire to be loved, and that all humanity believed his words. She cried blood until the world was overtaken by water and drowned everybody. A small group of humans were turned into fish to survive.
The Fifth Sun has two main stories. The one he told says that Nanauatzin and Tecuciztecatl were chosen as candidates when in every story i have read, they volunteered to become the sun. Tecuciztecatl was chosen by the other gods but was a coward and did not want to jump in the flame. Nanauatzin jumped in as soon as Tecuciztecatl bowed out. In shame, Tecuciztecatl jumped in after Nanauatzin. Nanauatzin sun rose first, splendid and radiant, especially compared to his sore ridden body. When Tecuciztecatl's Sun rose it was bright as well, but the gods did not see it right that He was as splendid as he was given his cowardice and they threw a rabbit at him to dim his sun. (I dont recall the gods beating Tecuciztecatl at any point but there are many variations in the story, this may be one i have missed).
I do not understand how he completely avoids mentioning Tonatiuh's role in this story. It was Tonatiuh that would not move the sun and demanded sacrifice from all the other gods to move it across the sky. He is so much of an important god in this equation that he sits dead center in the Aztec Calendar and exist on Mexico's money to this day. He is one of the reasons that Huītzilōpōchtli is so important as a war god and a sun god. Without war bringing in sacrificial victims, the sun would not rise.
I have only gotten an hour into the lecture, but missing parts of the story or rewriting them and avoiding major players is a big red flag to me. This is probably the most important story for the Mexica People.
2)
The Culhuacan Princess that was flayed was a sacrificial vicitm to Huītzilōpōchtli to make her his wife by most accounts I have read. Xipe Totec i saw brought up in wikipedia. I have not read the source, but i would not doubt there are variations in the story. As far as I know, the consensus is that the woman was Sacrificed to Huītzilōpōchtli to be his bride
3)
I believe the Nahuatl Pronunciation of Mexica is (Me-Shee-Ca). X's in words sound like (SH) for the most part in Nahuatl regardless of position in the word. the diatribe about Spain wanting to take Arabic out of Spanish doesn't make sense in this lecture, and he continues to use the wrong pronunciation of Mexica throughout the rest of this lecture because of the Arabic/Spanish history he added to it.
Edit: Texcoco is Pronounced (Te-sh-co-co)
The "SH" pronunciation of "X" is mentioned in the book in the description
4)
I have never heard it said that killing in warfare was Immoral to the Aztecs.
There were 2 forms of warfare; Conquest and Capture
In conquest, the Aztecs were formidable Killers. No, they did not enter battle unarmed.
For Capture (known as Flowery Wars), they did not go into battle unarmed. they used clubs to incapacitate. Even the Macuahuitl (Aztec Sword) was used to capture sacrificial victims, using the flat or cutting strategically. Most one on one encounters were for higher level warriors that were deemed valuable Sacrifice victims. in these cases, warriors stalked the field, chose a victim and hunted him down. a priest would take the defeated warrior and tie them up to move them off the battle field. I dont know where the notion that the mexica went into battle unarmed and would only wrestle victims to submission comes form.
This is in the book in the description.
5)
Roy,
We can be disgusted with Cannibalism and the European War Crimes.
Telling people that object to shut up about it is quite bizarre, equating the two is quite bizarre.
The Mexica committed many atrocities that they considered to be justified because of how they believed the universe functioned. Are people not allowed to believe that?
The barbarism that existed in Europe (Religious Wars, Wars for Power, the Spanish Inquisition, Capital Punishment) were all also justified by the people committing them.
Can we not just agree that both were pretty darn awful? or at least agree that Cannibalism is another step ahead of the brutalities of war that exist across the board?
The idea that Cannibalism was implemented as a protein source for the empire is debated intensely. The Mexica people hunted, fished, and domesticated turkeys. There were many Meat Protein sources, as well as plant based protein sources such as beans. It is near consensus that Consumption of human meant was for ritualistic purposes, and commoners were not allowed to partake.
To try to justify the act of Cannibalism and call it ethical is mind boggling to me, especially because the debate around it is so big, you dont have to bite that bullet.
This is mentioned in the book in the description.
Hi this Prof amazing what a fantastic lecturer his depth of research and knowledge has to be the best I have seen so far the cherry on the top is his way of presentation keep it up prof. I tried to find your full clip on the 6 gospels but couldn't has it been uploaded
You’re telling me I have to wait a year for part 2, damn. The wait gone be worth it but I really wanted to learn more
Always enjoy your lectures Dr.
Although I initially enjoyed this lecture, I’m a bit concerned about inaccuracies. As others have noted, it seems that certain stories have no source or solid basis. Is there any source for how each prisoner of war lived as a “shadow” to their captor for an entire year? Also it’s hard to believe that Aztecs would never use any weapons in warfare especially when conquering nearby cities. I’d love to enjoy more of this professors lectures but the inaccuracies make me worried.
The prisoner of war part is pretty well documented by Spanish and Mexica accounts. In Bernal Diaz book, they claimed that they freed Mexica captives, and virtually all captives refused to escape as they were always nobles and would suffer complete loss of any social standing for themselves and their family for their cowardice after having lost in what they considered a fair fight.
This is due in part as human sacrifices was practiced by the whole area and isn’t reviled as many UA-camr videos mistakenly believe. Mexica were hated for other reasons. In fact, it is believed that they did not practice human sacrificing until arriving in the area, as it was widely practiced long before their arrival.
Also, yeah, the supposed focus on only capturing captives IMO sounds too illogical to be true. I can see it being a focus for nobles, but it’s silly to believe that the Mexica wasn’t focused on defeating their enemy into submission, however that was done.
Which year are we at during this portion period of the tale? 39:39
1500 years before 1400ish.
1519-92=1427
1427-1500= 73 BCE
omg so excited for this!
Wool is great for temperature control. Keeps you cool in heat and warm in the cold
What an incredible teacher, love Dr. Casagranda.
This was such a great lecture, I'll be looking up more of his stuff.
Great lecture by Dr. Gasagranda.
I think around 1:15:00, there is something relevant to add.
The Mexica ("aztecs") had a type of armor called ichcahuīpīlli, "escapil" in Spanish. It is densely packed, unspun cotton stitched between two layers of fabric and could stop arrows, darts and even musket shots.
As always, thank you so much for the education Dr. Roy!
Looking forward to seeing more, keep up the good work and wish you good health!
I wait his lectures more than any other
Prof you have motivated me to learn much much more about this area. Muchas grats.
They weren't exactly drinking "cocoa", clarification is needed here. They made a very thick drink with it that resembles today's atole, and they believed it to have properties to heal. I feel like there are several points he could've clarified or further expand, it feels a bit misleading at points.
Mind blown Dr. Can't wait for part 2.
Good story teller. I hope he informs his students that he is presenting his version of history as seen through his eyes and not recorded facts. Great lecturer.
I will not miss a class of yours professor.
the perfect start for such lecture.
Such a beautiful way of teaching and so much knowledge, wow, GOD is great
Thank you Dr Roy .. excellent lecture
Love his lectures
An awesome video as usual 😊
Before we get into this, may I ask…what percentage of likelihood is there that Arabic, & Germanic influence came to the Americas (specifically South America) before history credits the Portuguese officially doing so? 6:46
Man this was so cool . Thank you Dr Casagranda
How he even memorise all these, just blow me away
Your lectures are awesome
hello, professor!
I'm hoping this message gets to you.
I noticed you removed the lectures on "us government summer class" on youtube, I was wondering if there's any way in which I can please have access to those recordings?
even if it is for a short time, I'll be diligent in finishing it.
Thank you!!!