This is an unmanned lander, There were nine manned missions to the moon and six landings meaning that 12 men in total walked on its surface. It would have been at least 20 had it not been for the near catastrophe and aborted landing of Apollo 13 and the premature cancellation of the programme and with it, Apollo 18, 19 and 20. Hope this helps.
@@EllmaticEddy How interesting. So we should disregard the consilience of entire branches of science, specialist fields of expertise such as aerospace engineering worldwide, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, Nobel Prize winning physicists, each of the 76 other space agencies on the planet in addition to objective scientific, independent and third party evidence that is incontrovertible? In short, domains, disciplines and individuals far cleverer and more informed than the insistence and argument from incredulity of an insignificant, random, gullible Dunning Kruger afflicted troll and believer in dumb online conspiracy theory with zero knowledge of the subject whatsoever? Righto then. Could you present your singular, most compelling and irrefutable piece of evidence then that the Apollo missions were "impossible". Naturally you'll be keen to avoid the same old obligatory, predictable dumb online conspiracy theory that is consumed and regurgitated ad nauseum by those with zero knowledge of the science, technology and the history of the Apollo Programme and has been debunked over and over and over again. So do you have anything vaguely resembling your own thoughts or observations based upon informed understanding that objectively proves that the Apollo moon landings were "impossible"? Or do you simply have and argument from ignorance like all the rest. Think hard before you reply.
This might be it the first person to walk on the moon
This is an unmanned lander,
There were nine manned missions to the moon and six landings meaning that 12 men in total walked on its surface. It would have been at least 20 had it not been for the near catastrophe and aborted landing of Apollo 13 and the premature cancellation of the programme and with it, Apollo 18, 19 and 20.
Hope this helps.
@@yassassin6425 that’s not true that impossible
@@EllmaticEddy
How interesting. So we should disregard the consilience of entire branches of science, specialist fields of expertise such as aerospace engineering worldwide, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, Nobel Prize winning physicists, each of the 76 other space agencies on the planet in addition to objective scientific, independent and third party evidence that is incontrovertible? In short, domains, disciplines and individuals far cleverer and more informed than the insistence and argument from incredulity of an insignificant, random, gullible Dunning Kruger afflicted troll and believer in dumb online conspiracy theory with zero knowledge of the subject whatsoever?
Righto then.
Could you present your singular, most compelling and irrefutable piece of evidence then that the Apollo missions were "impossible". Naturally you'll be keen to avoid the same old obligatory, predictable dumb online conspiracy theory that is consumed and regurgitated ad nauseum by those with zero knowledge of the science, technology and the history of the Apollo Programme and has been debunked over and over and over again. So do you have anything vaguely resembling your own thoughts or observations based upon informed understanding that objectively proves that the Apollo moon landings were "impossible"? Or do you simply have and argument from ignorance like all the rest.
Think hard before you reply.