I Was At The Johnny Depp Trial - Is The Good Morning America Juror Real? Who Is It?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
- GMA Article: www.goodmorningamerica.com/cu...
Patreon: / runkleofthebailey
Locals: runkleofthebailey.locals.com/
BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay
All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.
I watched the trial every day with Emily D. Baker. Not once did Emily take a side or make me feel like I needed to take a side. I came up with my own conclusion that JD never did the things he was accused of. The “juror” came to most of the same conclusions I did based on the evidence.
Yes me too! Love Emily D Baker! She is fair and just states the facts. I think she formed her opinion with us as we all watched together.
Unfortunately, the MsM still tries to TELL you what to believe, and the independent people and lawyers on UA-cam just present the facts and evidence and let us form our own opinion. Really hope MsM corporations lose millions dollars because no one trusts them after all the biased bullshit they try to force feed us.
💯
I was exactly the same. Went into the trial pretty blind on the facts and came to my own conclusion from the evidence.
Gets on my nerves that Amber and her team are making out like the world is just full of Depp fans, rather than normal people witnessing a trial, seeing all the testimony’s etc
Me too! Glued to Emily D. Baker’s channel, I walked her around my house on my phone doing chores and remote working. I listened to every bit of the trial and her commentary plus the interviews when you, Rob and Larry came out of courthouse. 👍🏽
This is why I love Runkle! He says what he feels regardless of how others might react. Also, congrats, Runkle, on the Silver Play Button!! Much deserved!
Runkle we miss you everyday
I also like Runkle, he explains why he won't just guess. He doesn't want to get in trouble nor embarass anyone. Have a great weekend, it's Friday in Australia 🇦🇺 😀
Agreed!!!
I Love & Respect Runkles direct & honest opinions 🙂 I like the way he has the ability to explain all sides fairly…. 💖YAY 💖
🎉🪅Congratulations 🪅🥂
ON YOUR PLAY BUTTON !!!!!
WE KNEW YOU WOULD DO IT! UA-cam PLAY BUTTON ▶️
🥰👏👏🎉YAY🎉👏👏👏🥰👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼▶️👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Yes, Runkle is a pleasure to listen to. He is both informative as well as honest
I love how he analyses all of this ...
The twitter thing is a nothing burger. Believe it or not, not everyone has every social media. I'm 36 and don't have Twitter or Instagram.
28 here and only have UA-cam and LinkedIn
Yeah I'm in my 20s and don't have Twitter, and neither do any of my friends. The only person I know with a Twitter is my grandma who likes arguing about politics
I don't have twitter, doesn't stop me from looking at tweets though. Insta is a different matter, it always ask me to create an account.
I don’t have twitter or instagram either and I’m 29 lol
I don’t have twitter either. I’ve got tik tok because I like to edit videos I make of my family and my account is private. I only watch tik tok videos that my friends send me because they are funny or entertaining. Lol 😂 I do have fb and IG but I prefer UA-cam. ☺️
I'd like to say I don't believe the news would make false assertions that they have checked their sources, but ...
Yep!!!!
buuuuttttt
Yeah I'm with you.
I hate big buts and they frequently lie.
Yes i really don’t like the fact they don’t bother mentioning how they confirmed
I worked with a woman who was a jury member on a capital murder trial in Ontario, Canada, of a man who raped and murdered a 9-yr old girl. This jury member had a female child of her own and found it to be the most difficult task to deal with in her life -several weeks of shocking testimony and police reports, which most of us could never imagine in our worst nightmares. She recounted that herself and the other jurors were very focused and serious, listening closely and evaluating the evidence. The jury found the man guilty. This jury experience haunted her 10 years after, when I met her. For those of us who have not been called to this responsibility, it is easy to speculate and imagine, but until you are part of it you cannot know or judge. Go for it Runkle, you are doing great work for us who wish to understand The Law. We appreciate you.
If it's the one that I'm thinking about, where you mention the province and age, I'm pretty sure I know which trial you are referring to. The details that make it to the media are nowhere near what the jury sees.
@@un-pankoed well she met her 10 years later! After the case like she said
@@un-pankoed Wow, I can't believe that is an actual law. It should absolutely be changed, maybe like the one in the US, which means that you can't speak about it while serving as a juror, but as soon as the trial is over, you can say whatever you want. I would personally still talk it over with my therapist if I lived in Canada. If my mental health issues aren't enough to get me out of jury duty, if they can make me serve and make my PTSD worse, I would do anything I could to help myself. And if I know my therapist well, she would help me.
@@un-pankoed Technically it's illegal to talk to your therapist but it's also illegal for your therapist to say what you said to them, so as long as you don't tell on yourself you're basically good there by loophole haha The law 100% needs to be changed though
So tired of hearing that Johnny only won because everyone loves him for being a famous actor. Personally, I really enjoy movies with him in them and love the characters he's brought to life, but if there was legitimate evidence he did the things AH alleged I'd happily throw him in a cell myself, lock it, and forget all about him. I believe him because of EVIDENCE. She was conclusively proven to be lying and was the actual aggressor. And to me, the only thing that comes close to how wrong it would be for a person to do the things AH alleged, is someone LYING about those things. She should be so ashamed she can't even have mirrors in her house because then she'd have to look at the vile person that tried to ruin someone else's life out of spite. She is well and truly reprehensible.
Thats yhe thing people think depp fans have no heart...not true if he was found guilty he would have wornit
I’m done fighting with ppl on Instagram. Everyone who hasn’t watched the trial still thinks he abused her. I give them the receipts and I get called delusional, that I’m a liar, where’s the proof etc… it’s really frustrating to see how outside of the lawtube community some people believe the headlines.
I’ve truly enjoyed JD since Jumpstreet! But if I believed he’d raped her with bottles, and done violent cavity searches for cocaine, I’d help you lock him away and throw away the key! I highly doubt he became this vile horrid human in his 50s! I just don’t believe her bc of HER testimony, and all the lies she was caught in! The fact that she tried to convince the world that he is a “Harvey Weinstein” just to boost her career is as you said reprehensible! She ought to be locked away herself! She lied about donating $$ to sick kids.. he’s been on video actually brightening those same childrens days by visiting them as Captain Jack Sparrow! Her jealousy and greed is gross, and I cannot fathom anyone believes a word she says!
Bravo!👏👏
As a survivor, she sickens me, so I couldn't agree more.
I agree that it would be nice if they told us how they confirmed it was a real juror, but I don't think US media outlets are used to explaining themselves to their audiences. They just expect to be believed wholesale.
I don't think that's exclusive to US outlets?
Which is why more and more people are turning away from the MsM.
Amen! Only the people who are sheep believe MSM. I rely on truth seekers like Ian and most law tubers... ❤️ Nick Reikata 🚫🍞🍞. 😆 There are other wonderful folk to watch as well. Megan Fox the author, That Umbrella Guy, Incredibly Average, Faran Balanced, James from Court, DUI Guy+, and the people who study body language... very informative. I'm hoping they will do more panel discussions. OMG... Am I Simpin'? Geez...sorry. I'm new to all this but wanted to share.
I feel like if they were not doing due diligence and let a "juror" instead of a juror interview, they'd find someone juicer who would imply some sort of jury misconduct. If this interview is real it's huge for Depp, they make it perfectly clear that they didn't do any of the things that were accused heading into an appeal.
If Heard does appeal, maybe this interview gets validated or invalidated in the process.
Ya know in the UK trial, the first day was all press releases about Johnny trashing hotel rooms. Press releases as EVIDENCE! Not police reports. But sensational crap written about celebrities. I haven’t finished reading it, but the first few days are farcical!
I believe "if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is", so I am taking it all with a BIG grain of salt. It is quite possible that a juror had enough of them being trashed in the news that they felt the need to speak up. At the end of the trial the Judge told them they could or not talk to anyone, but their identity would be protected by the court for 1 year.
Is that big grain of salt from your addict salt shaker? 🧂 🧂 🧂
The jurors can talk to anyone anytime they like. The judge did not tell them they couldn't. The order was simply that their identities would be sealed for s year. That doesn't not mean that they can't speak if they choose to.
@@AmandaPaige71 Maybe a jar of salt lol
@@munchiekins .. Mega Pint ..
@@lisamora8141 They said 'could or not' not couldn't.
Ian seems like a person of very high moral and ethical fiber, in that he doesn't follow any narrative and sees each situation as a unique and specific event, examining and exploring the tangible evidence. I fucking love it.
FOR REAL. It’s refreshing af
I'm a journalist who has worked for mainstream media organizations for many years. I know for sure that GMA is the gold standard when it comes to confirmation. The EPs wouldn't air this if the person wasn't verified. Especially given the high profile nature of this story and their competitor airing the exclusive with Amber this week.
I would think the jurors have their summons, court house temp badge, the per diem pay stubs, & parking stubs to show as proof. Maybe not the trial name but a way to verify, they had jury duty at this court house during the right time period.
I respect your opinion, but unfortunately we no longer have a gold standard when it comes to standard media in this country anymore. We have a divisive media that only airs the parts of a story they agree with and not the entire story to allow people to make up their own mind. It's been proven many times over especially when it comes to political matter or identity political matters, such as the metoo, believe all women, social justice and other like causes. Most people no longer trust the mainstream media.
What I learned from this is that NBC was really playing this up with a three day lead-in to an hour long interview, and a competing network just stuck a pin in their balloon.
PLEASE tell everyone you know, NOT to watch the interview on network television, boycott NBC on Friday night when they air the entire interview! She doesn't deserve the ratings! I'd love to see her get the lowest ratings in history, lol! So many UA-camrs will be showing it, wait for them
To be fair, if I was a juror on the JDvAT trial, after seeing Elaine and now Amber doing these ridiculous interviews and talking down on the jurors I’d be pissed and I would want to speak un anonymously. I’d want my opinion on what went on but probably never show my face bc of AH fan backlash and it coming back to me, my work, my family etc. I believe the GMA did their homework to vet and vouch this is a real juror. I highly doubt they would just take anyone’s word for it lol
I thought the same thing after Amber doing the interviews. Between her and Elaine saying social media played such a big part, that’s probably when I would want to come forward. Especially anonymously before the appeal. Who knows, tho!
You’d certainly like to say so!
Because there were no specifics or idiosyncrasies that feel authentic, I think GMA made it up themselves, so they can look like they got the big scoop first. I believe this because there is no way anyone can prove it’s not a real juror. Even if All the jurors came out and each said it wasn’t me, GMA could say this juror is now just continuing to hide his identity and doesn’t want himself to be known as the first person who came out on the topic. None of the jurors could prove it either because it’s not like they are all a family and in each other’s business to know. I could be wrong.
@@TenTenJ Jurors are in charge of asking the court for the pertinent documentation that states information such as the dates and times they are needed in court for jury duty. This documentation is typically requested for the jurors employers. This is something that juror could’ve have shown GMA as “proof”. Employers can also call the court to confirm if the employee did in fact have jury duty on said days/times etc. I myself, have dealt with employees having to submit this kind of documentation bc the employees at our company still get payed their full salaries during jury duty so sometimes a court letter is sufficient other times calling the court to confirm info is also necessary.
Same! As soon as Amber started her interviews, as a juror I would want to speak out too.
re: “sharp elbows”
Keep in mind that these jurors all live in the DMV. “Sharp elbows” is a pretty commonly used phrase when talking about political campaigns and races and various politicians, and those are pretty normal topics of conversation in that geographical region...maybe more so than in most areas of the country. It would not surprise me at all to have a conversation with a random someone from Fairfax County during which they dropped that particular phrase.
Good point about the "sharp elbows" phrase being used in politics. I can confirm that. Then you are right about Virginia being near the epicenter of politics in the USA. Great observations!
I was surprised anyone would find that to be unusual speech. It's common where I am in both the political sense and with the sports and military influence where we are. Specifically, basketball and wrestling, in our case.
Thank you for this. I’m from NYC and now live in the south and never heard this phrase before.
I'm in Canada and it refers to politics here too, pretty much being extremely aggressive.
How common is the word "fiasco" there, I wonder? Genuine question (I'm a surprised non-American)
This video is a great example of what makes Runkle credible. Too many are willing to sellout for clicks, new subs, the almighty $. Unfortunately, a person with real integrity is hard to find these days, but I believe we’ve found it here in this modest Canadian lawyer.
Agreed
You need to watch and read the entire comments made by the juror not just the six minute edit by GMA which slightly spins that jurors comments such as both were abusive. What the juror actually stated is that couples argue and they both were verbal and that doesn't make either right or wrong but there was NO evidence that JD was physically abusive and in fact the jury believed Amber was the aggressor. The entire comments printed out by GMA also has the juror addressing the claims about social media, the witnesses in that they only took a count of witnesses that were not paid employees or family and friends, which meant they took note of witnesses like the police, and the juror addressed the lies AH caught out on, the knife she gave JD as well as her photos of JD asleep. It was clear someone on that jury had knowledge of addictions etc. Please review the entire printed version GMA has released as Nate the Lawyer has, it is super interesting and explains how seriously the jury took there duty. I feel AH team constant comments that the jury did not take it seriously has lead to this one juror defending the duty they took seriously and why they came to the verdict.
Juror explains mutually abusive comment: "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying," he said.
Oh gimme a ffff break ! He exposed his lack of understanding of their role as jurors .
To even MENTION the “ crocodile “ tears & feeling uncomfortable when AH looked at them ....instant bias . How ffff pathetic & a totally irrelevant tone deaf comment from someone tasked w such a socially important role .. That usual trope that victims can be measured according to a scale deemed acceptable by society & if they don’t conform then they are judged and discredited
Hmmmm, Isn’t that EXACTLY what the cops did in Gabby Petito case ....they deemed her hysterical and the aggressor and gave Brian the Johnny gold star treatment . These jurors obviously have NO understanding of DV if they say Johnny was more stable . They fell for his daily charm offensive and were gaslit by the bullsh surrounding the court ea day .
Further proof ( straight from the jurors mouth ) that this was a total travesty of justice . OJ jury all over again ....celebrity trumps truth and justice
@@abcdefg3315 IO’s listening on telephone evidence, for starters …he was listening in real time , and called 911. Rocky’s intervention a few minutes later . Clumps of hair . Nurse . Amber’s skeletal frame at the time , along w the bruises on face , arms ( indisputable evidence )
But , of course, none of that counts to the Deppford wives and the desperate Depphead wannabes . Even Ambers dead body would have simply elicited “ It was her own fault . She made him do it “ . To the Jack Sparrow club Amber never stood a chance
@@equatorialjourney4478 I think the jury absolutely understood their role… and it’s not agreeing with some muppet who thinks they know more than those who sat through 24+ days of evidence.
If they discounted Heard’s testimony, it’s because there were so many objective witnesses who gave them enough evidence to reject it. I’m glad someone like you wasn’t on the jury.
@@equatorialjourney4478 Who hurt you and was it with jumper cables?
I agree that there weren't any great revelations in the statement. Personally, when I heard it I thought that it was a little sad that the juror felt he needed to defend himself and the other jurors. They gave up their lives for a long time and then Amber and Elaine go on TV and make statements that the jury didn't do their job in an appropriate way. I wouldn't be surprised if he spoke to the other jurors and cleared what he was going to say in the interview.
@Honey Crisp I agree 💯
The whole "sharp elbows" or "crocodile tears" language could just be something that was said by a juror or jurors in the room and not this particular juror's choice of phrase.
Those are very common phrases in our house/community.
Neither of those expressions are rare in UK and elsewhere
@@theConquerersMama Agreed. It surprises me that so many people think they're rare expressions
I agree! This Juror didn't give us any outstanding information that the world wasn't privy too. Gma could have said "We paid this Juror, We meet in person with him and we thoroughly confirmed. I'm suspicious 🤔
I totally agree with you.
The problem is, we were privy to almost all the same information as them. The only things we don't know is their deliberations...
I'm not saying that means this guy is legit, just that not having "new" info in this case isn't as damning as it would be in any other trial.
I think people need to get real. Maybe the jury was sick of the claims being made about AH and team that they did not take their duty seriously. Maybe this juror had had enough of AH claims and wanted to defend the jury. At the same time if I was that jury and I chose to speak out, I would do it exactly the same way. I would NOT want to be seen in person or have my actual voice heard. I would provide proof I was on the jury but would make sure I remained anonymous. Think about it. These jurors have families etc. What do you think would happen if people on either side knew who it was, where they lived? Can you imagine the media and some crazies on their doorstep. That is s serious safety concern for each juror and their families. So I would do it exactly as this juror has to ensure I made sure people knew what AH claiming about the jury is a lie,.while at the same time protecting my and my family's safety. Makes perfect sense.
Those older sayings could come from working with the elderly, or close to their grandparents. Congrats on the play button, you more than earned it. Not many people got their button by sleeping on the sidewalk lol.
“Sharp elbows” could have been a term mentioned in deliberations and this juror just using it as an apt illustration of what was brought up by one of the other jurors.
I also just keep thinking it could be someone stealing a phrase from someone else. If an older juror said it a lot, is it unfathomable that a younger juror might say it later?
Is it used in certain cultures?
It is a fairly common term in the punk rock and metal community.
@@clairebeane3455 Wait...what?
Yes, was going to make this exact statement.
You would think that they double checked before allowing them to give an interview. They should tell us how they confirmed!
Thanks for all you do, Runk.
Congrats on the silver play button. You deserve it buddy!
What's the silver play button? I'm new to utube.
No expert myself, but it refers to rewards recognizing subscriber numbers. I think the silver play button award is for 100k subs. Ian now has 200k (and growing!)
Yup. I've been here since the JD/ah trial. He deserves and everything he gets
I'm not going to believe it until they actually sit down in an interview and someone is able to identify them.
AH team made sure that can't happen for 1yr
@@kimmatthews9795 They can reach out to the media, but the media is not allowed to reach out to them for a year.
@@kimmatthews9795 that's not true. A juror can come out and identify themselves on their own. But their identities are sealed to the public for a year. If one or more of them comes to be interviewed, they can do it on their own, and volunteering to show identity.
@@rainbowgoth1566 yeah but it's gonna be hard for us to know if they are one of the jurors without verification
@@kimmatthews9795 no they can come forward themselves. Its just the court who cannot release their names for a year.
Fellow Canadian here. Congratulations on your UA-cam success! 🇨🇦
Thank you so much!!
I’ve never had Twitter since it’s existence, and I’m 42 now. I don’t consider myself old- smart, yes 🙃
One of the most rational lawtubers along with Bruce Rivers. Good work Runkle, so glad I found your channel.
Every time I watch a Bruce Rivers video the rest of the day my brain is going "Bruce Rivers he's a criminal lawyer...Bruce Rivers he's a criminal lawyer...and he's gonna react to all the self snitchin."
When the Juror said they were both abusive to each other, he didn't need to say that. Which makes me question if he was a real Juror.
True, but he meant verbal abuse. He also said they didn’t believe that Johnny was ever physically abuse toward her. I’m still suspicious as well, though!
@@courtneyblue15 He may have meant verbal abuse, but he didn't make it clear
Sharp elbows is often a term used in the US military.
Agreed. And in basketball.
Congratulations on getting your plaque!!! That is so exciting for you. Thank you for being so honest in your opinions about if this was a real juror or not. We won't really know until they decide to be interviewed by someone on tv. Maybe in a couple of months they will do so. I also think it is so nice of you to list your special donors at the end of each video. Take Good Care
Agreed! He’s the only UA-camr I’ve ever seen do that. Although I’m sure he won’t be able to continue doing it if his Patreon subscriber count goes through the roof!
I call these cross examination "gotcha" scenes Perry Mason Moments.
Runkle, I remember Matlock, but my grandpa loved Perry Mason. I'd try to be safe under the covers before that theme song would play. Scared me to bits.
I can't accept this man as a juror until they explained how they confirmed him as a juror!
After the way AH talked about the jury being influenced by social media I thought it was only a matter of time before a ticked off juror came forward to debunk her narrative. I'm no fan of MSM but I can't see ABC being anything less than diligent in screening for authenticity in any juror.
Ms. Heard said “Look me up” on the stand while staring down the jurors during trial.
And her own team brought in expert witness to analyze social media and hashtag data.
Good riddance.
Isn’t this “real” juror saying the exact same thing the “fake” juror said weeks ago? Isn’t this the conundrum AH’s team created with hiding jurors names for a year.
I thought of this too!
The court is keeping the jurors identity secret for their safety and privacy.
I'm pretty sure the juror can reveal their names, just that others cannot
I am very sceptical about this being one of the actual juror.
The jurors are not barred from going public. The judge made that clear.
The only way we can be 100% certain that it is a real juror is if they decide to do an interview with someone who was there, like Runkle, DUI guy, Law and Lumber, etc.
yes cos the whole freaking world revolves around Lawtube
@@SleutherStrode He said LIKE Runkle, etc. The main point was WITH SOMEONE WHO WAS THERE. You should read a sentence carefully before you start popping off on people...
Thanks for the video. Totally off topic, but your hair looks great back like that.
cut short it would look amazing
I believe in our justice system, it isn’t perfect but hearing this jurors opinion I thought it sounded democratic and happy they saw that Amber was clearly lying. I don’t believe in lies
I would've preferred if they said how they confirmed this was a real juror.
Either way, fake or not, it is a huge slap in Amber's face after her recent interview. 😂. I can see how jurors might be pissed off after watching it. Having doubt is good especially when it comes to mainstream media these days.
Lovin your hair like that Runkle! ☺️
Me too
I been curious if those who were there that paid attention to the jurors thoughts on this. So glad you did this quick video on your thoughts.
Great points as always Ian. Appreciate your insights so much, you are truly awesome!
Hi Ian! Was waiting for the info about this juror! Thx and hope you’re getting sleep 🌿
I think there was a telling moment that this is a fake when he said, AH looked at the JURY, now he should have used the word US.
They put words in there for him though a lot ,he spoke in the 1st person only ,GMA would add what they thought was “context” and put it in the 3rd person so it could just be that maybe?
I love the way your mind works, the way you explain things. I didn't even think about it possibly being a fake.
Totally!
My first thought was it didn’t seem legit but when I read the article and saw a little more there, I’m coming around but not 100% yet.
I find it really odd that he referenced the talk show (where Amber said she donated all the money) as a UK program. It was a very prominent piece of evidence and made very clear that it was Dutch tv. I'm very suspicious of him.
During the trial they said Danish.
He didn't say that, the host said that. If you read the GMA article, the jurors quote clearly stated dutch tv show.
@@joyanna9433 Oh good. I thought that was so weird.
Thanks for your coverage, Runkle!
I am so thankful for your assessment of this whole trial. I really enjoy your content and your observations
I actually did learn something new from this juror. According to this juror, they dismissed all the testimonies from paid expert witnesses, family, friends, and employees.
I find that hard to believe though.
@@courtneyblue15 I don’t know. Seems pretty plausible to me. It might have been easier for the jurors to come to an agreement to dismiss the witnesses that might have a conflict of interest rather than dig deep into to each of their testimonies to determine what was credible/conflicting. 🤷♀️ just my thoughts.
We didn’t learn anything from the juror. But he did confirm that Amber and her team lost the case themselves. I believe the information detailed in the article.
yes we did learn something read the full article because GMA only put a bit on YT. We learned the juror saw what we all saw,
I truly believe the jurors are frustrated they have been repeatedly accused of disregarding their oath and this is why he spoke out. My guess is if there were any jurors that were feeling any empathy for Amber in their deliberations, now are feeling better at finding her liable. Ms. Heard is not doing herself any favors. This interview she did is nothing more than her attempt to educate all us "average people" because we are ignorant. SMH
I love this. Thank you, Runkle.
Thank you for all of your coverage and your tone, you also have nice eyes, from the UP of Michigan!!
If you’ve ever seen my wife bust through a mosh pit, you know what “sharp elbows” means
My son calls mine “elbows of death.” 😂
Kinda sounds like a Gordie Howe reference.
Copied & pasted:
In its most basic sense, it means pushing through a crowd.
But it is also used for a more metaphorical sense. E.g. for people who don't mind pushing other people out of the way or stepping on others to get what they want.
In other words, it means to be aggressive or ambitious, usually at the expense of others.
James from court also talked about how some jurors stopped looking at her because her staring seemed to make them uncomfortable.
Love you Runkle! Your intellectual honesty is incredibly refreshing. Cheers to a local by the way! If I'm ever in need of a lawyer I know who to call!
I love your take on things! Love Runkle wisdom!!
Another mainstream media source played the fake TikTok juror video and presented it as real, so at this point it wouldn’t surprise me if GMA didn’t vet this guy either.
Probably the same guy, what this “juror” says and what the tik tok guy said are 95% the same
@@graemeclark2485
Anything is possible when it comes to the MSM! Although, it could very well be real, I’m still holding out for an actual interview with a juror that doesn’t want to stay anonymous.
I thought the comment about the drugs consumed by JD being downers and then AH's own pictures confirmed that more than the monster scenario she was trying to sell, was a good one. We all felt that but the way he put it alluding to some background drug knowledge was the only thing I hadn't heard - or at least put like that.
Congrats on the silver play button! And thank you for giving this careful thought, regardless of pressure to say something else.
Again, I love your honesty, thanks Runkle!
I love your insight, Runkle. I’m in Mississippi, it’s interesting to learn about laws and things going on in Canada. Of all the folks I followed from the Depp trial, you’re my fav. I also wanted to thank you for being appropriately dressed during the trial. It’s a pet peeve of mine when people dress casual to a court proceeding.
Runkle thank you! I was suspicious of the timing due to NBC releasing a 3 part AH interview tomorrow. It may be 1 of the real jurors but ABC may be in a rush to find someone to give an interview. Guess we’ll have to wait to see. You can just confirm or debunk that they were really on the jury without saying anything about a juror’s actual number or anything that could ID them. Love smart insight.
Congratulations on your silver play button Ian!!! Love your channel! You’re doing a GREAT job💯🥰
Really GREAT points made, Runkle ❣❣❣❣💯
Really well thought out review Runkle... I am 100% sure that CBS isn't intentionally faking it and close to 100% as my assumption is that CBS wld have been thoroughly authenticated the Juror to ensure they don't have egg on their face as it wld be incredibly embarrassing and not worth this exclusive.
The juror interview was released on ABC- Good Morning America
Sharp elbows is well known to punk or metal fans and mosh pits.
With my nickname being "Moshpit Mimi", I can agree.
I will also say that my husband, who is 45, has never had an social media account and doesn't use it at all. The only reason he knows anything about this case is because I talked about it Non-Stop and showed him a bunch of it so he could laugh. LOL but being that social media came out when we were in our late 20s and he's never had an account does make that possibly very true.
Yep. Bartend at a Punk Rock bar. Working a show tonight. Very common statement. 🤜🤛
@@rainbowgoth1566 I have several friends who have zero social media presence. It is more common than people believe. 😊
Thanks Ian, it shows I'm not the only one thinking this way! Look forward to your next streaming event. God Bless!
Thank you, Runkle
One of the main question not asked that makes me suspicious is what happened when they didn't fill out the amount jury form for the amount of money. The questions were something lots of people could speculate on and answer to me.
go to the GMA article and not the YT clickbait FFS.
@@SleutherStrode Wow, the article on line is so different than what GMA reported.
By the way, I loved your time with the courtroom artist. Fascinating takes from both of you on the atmosphere and put out a very different way of thinking about the whole scene. Thanks for the mind-expanding thoughts.
Thanks for your honest answers.
You're wonderful. Thank you for taking the time to educate
When you mentioned the Jason Momoa testimony I’m just thinking about how they even got his fake testimony wrong. They said he said hi to Camille. He did not. He said hi Amber 😂
"I don't know who it is and I'm sure YOU don't either." LMAO.. PERFECTION.
The one element that makes me lean toward it being a legitimate juror was "his" statement they started by disregarding the experts and those that had "skin in the game". That left Amber and her obvious lies, Johnny with his frankness and believability AND a half dozen of others that weren't experts or his "friends" that backed his theory of the case.
Congratulations on the the silver play button Legoless.. er, Runkle.
Thank you for your prefacing on this Ian. Love you. 🤍
Thank you, Ian, for being fair & encouraging us to not make a rash judgement but await more info.
The juror is just saying what any sane person who watched the case would have said. None of the MSM were there covering the case properly. MSM should just trust the jury and the judicial system with the initial decision. Stop trying desperately to question the jury? It should be we watched the case , I’m a credible trained journalist and investigated the case myself and saw she clearly lied!
I agree with you I don't trust the news period
Hi Runkle! Just wanted to say congrats on your you tube play button!! So happy for you!
So great hearing you been a minute as I’ve had covid here in New Zealand Thrilled for your 200k followers I was in your first 100k so celebration!
Sometimes I copy the phrasing of my 19 years old daughter.... it also could be one of the younger jurors who knows this phrase from his parents....
I honestly had to urban dictionary "sharp elbows" because I don't recall hearing that phrase. I was imagining someone grinding them into a desk or a table, but now it makes sense when you think of it meaning literally elbowing people out of your way. Sideways elbows, now downward in front elbows. :B
I'll listen to your wise, well-reasoned evaluations all day if the choice is between that and definitive explanations that are nothing more than guesses. I appreciate the content you deliver (and I loved your contributions on Joe's stream last night when you guys discussed the Bill of Rights.)
I would have laughed my ass off rolling on the floor if at the end of the interview, the juror said… Bobba Bowie Bobba Bowie, Listen to Howard Stern.
This seems like what we all would have expected one of these jurors would say. The media is not above making up things🤔…
Right! How many times have they trotted out the good ol' "sources say" weasel tactic onto something that gets proven to be blatantly false the next day. Legacy media has no problem peddling falsehoods if it benefits them.
hey, I agree. "The juror" did not provided any new information. Anybody could have say the same thing. Thanks Runkle, I don't feel too cautious 😊
Maybe an older juror said "sharp elbows " and a younger juror said "That perfectly describes this situation " I think the ONE juror tried to speak for all of them.
Love you content and your explanation!❤️❤️❤️
Runkle is such a calm dude then he talks about his love for guns and his outro is hardcore rock. I love it lol
As far as the authenticity of the juror is concerned, the math itself is the biggest strike against it.
There were nine jurors listening and only seven that got to deliberate whereas there are god knows how many people that would love to fake something like this.
Heaps would love to fake it..however..they'll eventually get caught won't they...just like Amber...it always catches up!
Congratulations on your play button! That's gotta be a good feeling. You definitely deserve it!
Thank you for this. I trust your opinion over some others who have covered this. Thanks for what you do!
I am sceptic of this juror, he mismentions uk show for dutch show, says she said on the show “i gave it away” which she doesnt say, so serious doubts for me just cos of those 2 things
If a man was guilty, they would never ever let him have an interview, how are they allowing Amber to get paid for being an abuser and a liar.. Crazy.
R Kelly?!
Prince Andrew?
I love your takes. Please keep going... And also... Keep up on your leather work!
Congrats on the Silver Play Button!! Keep being you!
This is why Runkle is my favorite! I will always appreciate someone telling the truth instead of what I want to hear.
Could you please review the GMA article, which has a lot more detail? Btw love your views and learned a lot 🙂
Always love ya Runkle!
Love you Runk.
Thank your wife for me, behind every good man…
WOOHOO! 100K! 🎉
NB...Please read this, Runkle. What is bothering me about it is, that I heard that expression about sharp elbows from someone connected to the interview with Amber Heard maybe Savannah...and that is just before that juror comes forward...yes, that bothers me, because I am sure I noticed that expression in these last days, because I am Danish, so it was my First hearing the same expression, that we have in Denmark. Thanks for all you do for us 🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤