``Country(Bangladesh) of Muslims'' - Mullah's boundless arrogance ! Islami Andolan Naib Amir Shaikh Charmonai Mufti Syed Muhammad Faizul Karim said, "Even if the country belongs to Muslims, everyone has rights." Celebrate Durga Puja in a bigger way than during Awami League. We will be by your side like a shadow. But the festival is for Hindus. Muslims can't be there.'(Source from Bangladeshi newspaperTime, 6 September 2024, Celebrate Durga Puja festival, I will be by your side like a shadow: Mufti Faizul Karim. সময়,৬ সেপ্টেম্বর ২০২৪,দুর্গাপূজা মহোৎসবে পালন করুন, ছায়ার মতো পাশে থাকব: মুফতি ফয়জুল করীম)
Rape cases in the Indian subcontinent, like in Kolkata, are inspired by the indian gods. When Shiva saw Mohini, he played with his penis & then raped her. Krishna was a playboy (his score 16,108 women)😮
Mr Gupta Indians having the the population 10 time bigger and Army Air force Navy and armed budget 7 time bigger then Pakistan can perform much more better rather can be easily defeated Pakistan so there is no if and but and excuses admit it Pakistani instead of less very quantity they fought very bravely and here you don't forget 1000 year slavery when few thousand ruled your millions of ppls ....
@@mtrajpoot2659 First of all 1000 years was not slavery. 800 years, if u include muslim rules. But that Muslim rule was not slavery. They were king from different countries who came and won some kings in India. That was the norm those days. India was under colonial rule and that was slavery.
@@BharatThatIsIndia .......dear Mr Bharat enjoy it and study FM Manik Shah book "The Man and his times " on 1971 war between India and Pakistan where Pak army was fighting with only 35000 soldiers one tank tank regiment 44 tank one artillery regiment one squadron 14 fighter saber 86 fighting ratio was 1 to 15 with Indian and without 0 supply from W Pakistan 1000 miles away ( this is all written in Manik Shah book )...you can study 🌾
It was due to western pressure particularly American. Even in 1971 indira ceeded 15000 sq km of western Pakistan to ayub in shimla agreement without any negotiations or concessions. She fell for bhutto crying that said if he would go empty hand.. His military boss won't spare him in Pakistan.
The biggest & fundament mistake in Pakistan’s calculation was that India will not & never attack & cross International Border. Ayub Khan was assured by foreign office buy Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Pakistan had already reached Akhnur when India crossed the International borders in Lahore & taken totally unprepared, even its troops were on usual vacation.
Why didn't Pakistan try to wrest Kashmir from India in 1962 but tried to do so in 1965? ------------- answer ----------- In 1962 Pakistan was not politically / diplomatically prepared to militarily annex Kashmir . In fact Pakistan was even prepared to help India to jointly face the Chinese threat , Further , Pakistan was then an Alliance partner of USA .USA had directed Pakistan not to open another front against India . India , Pakistan , Chinese relations changed very dramatically after 1962 Pakistan under the guidance of Bhutto struck an anti India deal with China whereby , inter alia , Pakistan gifted / sold 5000 sq km plus of POK-i.e. Shaksgam Valley to China . By 1965 , Pakistan had China as an ally . Kennedy was gone in 1963 . Also , most important for Pakistan’s 1965 Indian attack decision Nehru had also died in 1964. Pakistan thought that the new Indian Prime Minister , Lal Bahadur Shastri was a weak and indecisive leader and lacked stature especially when compared to Nehru. PM Lal Bahadur Shastri ‘s weak personality image was further bolstered by PM Shastri ‘s , sort of appeasement of Pakistan in the Rann of Kutch crisis in early 1965 Most important factor for Pakistan ‘s decision to attack India in Kashmir in1965 was that after her defeat in 1962 , India had started expanding exponentially her armed forces both in numbers and equipment. Pakistan felt that if delayed further Pakistan , which was militarily superior to India till then , would never be able to wrest Kashmir from India. So ,Pakistan attacked Kashmir calculating that a weak Indian PM would keep the war limited to Kashmir. But PM Shastri with totally unexpected resolve , bravery and decisiveness .He counter attacked Pakistan across the International Border in Punjab forcing Pakistan to withdraw its forces from the Kashmir front and to , later , accept a ceasefire
Beautifully analysed ! Mr Nehru too committed a blunder in 1959 , by out rightly rejecting FM Ayub Khan’s proposal of Joint Defence Agreement.Mr Nehru rejected it by saying JOINT DEFENCE AGAINST WHOM! Had this agreement been accepted, it would have completely changed the whole course of history. Perhaps even Indo- China War of 1962 , might not have taken place!
@@iqbalkhattak948even during the course of War he turned down the proposal of Air Marshal Arjan Singh Ji of using India's Air force against China fearing broader escalation in reality it could have turned the tide of the war
@@joydip9044 Another reason for India’s failure was that the generals as professional soldiers knew very well that the Indian army was neither well equipped nor well trained for high altitude warfare, but they failed to apprise the PM of the ground realities. Mr Nehru, thought it would be a small little action ,sufficient for the image building of his favourite lt Gen BM Kaul as a strong candidate for the Chief’s slot! However , the whole operation was based on wrong assumptions! Had there been someone like FM Manekshaw, result would have been lot more different.
@@iqbalkhattak948 yes our soldiers lacked equipment as pandit Nehru being a pacifist in those days was not in favour of having an army with more weapons and equipments saddest fact is that at that time china was going through the worst famine of human history in which 4 crore Chinese people died still their Army was well equipped to outmaneuver us
I wish that the Pakistanis watch this episode because they have been simply lying forever that they won this war and India attacked them first. Will they ever really wake up?
It was a stalemate, neither side had a decisive edge. Doesn't matter who started first, neither could conclude the end game. Omitting facts to paint a rosy picture is the standard mode on both sides of the border. This is what SG is doing for his Indian Audience and that's what many Pakistani journalists would do as well.
@@alis5040 It matters who started ? Pakistan had a objective and couldnt attain the objective and in a stalemate situtaion as per militiary practice it has to be considered to be lost, however even if buy your arguement then why it is celebrated as victory in Pakistan, while as best it was Draw
Dear SG ji, I believe you have already done CTC episode on 1965 war… I thought this was abridged version of your earlier episode… This episode is like Director Ram Gopal Verma remaking Sholay movie
@@umairahmed7704 sorry India official lifted 1.3 billion people out of poverty in 75 yrs source U.N our poverty is 13% decreasing yoy. By welfare schemes digitalization education etc. Youth literacy 96%, inflation 4% Pakistan in poverty 45% 30 to 40% inflation it will push 60% to 70% poverty in coming years. Population controlled in India 2% fertility Pakistan 4 to 5% still fertility Pakistan 70% budget interest payment India 13% budget interest payment India gst tax 140 crore tax payers.
@@umairahmed7704 Pakistan had all the advantages of a small strategic nation near central and west asia when it formed. But the leaders of the country were greedy and did not lead well at all, resulting in the degradation of most of these benefits. Had they been more lucky with their leaders and created more just and transparent societies without extremism, they could have had better living standards than present day India. Unfortunately, current day Pakistan is very much behind India in most living standard metrics (40 % poverty rate too), but who cares...the people of Pakistan have become very proficient at looking away from their problems over the years, so what could ever be wrong with the most glorious (Pak) islamic nation of all.
Indians specially indian hindus think that they won every war but forget their 1948 defeat by Pakistan & liberation of half Kashmir known as Azad Kashmir & Gilgit Baltistan also defeated badly in 1965 war from Pakistan & these black skin badbudaar hindus thinks they won every war with Pakistan, 1000 years of muslim's slaves 😂😂😂
Most of the operational plans are made/ built on highly attractive and appealing assumptions, but in reality absolutely wrong assumptions which in most of our subcontinent’s environments have failed ! I agree with Mr Gupta that 1965 War was a meaningless war of mutual incompetence. Realistically speaking strategically Pakistan suffered far more than India though tactically on quite a few fronts Pakistan’s performance can be regarded as satisfactory . Pakistan also failed in exploitation of initial successes! Both sides in 3 weeks time , ran out of the Staff Colleges Pink Solutions and had to agree to a ceasefire! Material losses were huge with no substantial results. Most of the researchers have now arrived at the conclusion that 1965 was a blunder committed by FM Ayub Khan. Had he not gone to war with India, Pakistan would have economically and politically progressed far better in the region . It would have been totally a different history.
How I wish Shastri had continued as PM for many years . A great incorruptible person. That would have prevented the Family from having a stranglehold over the Congress. The other point you mentioned is Abdul Hamid getting Param Vir Chakra. Such news should be publicized in today's hate-filled days
Sir thank you for the 60th 1965 Indo pak war Our congradtulation to the Brave indan soldiers All indians must pray for the soldiers died and their families Thank Lal Bhadur sastri Jai Jawan jai kisan Jai india
I found the book by journalist Nitin Gokhale on the 1965 war to be very accessible and well-written. The most interesting but is how the Indian Navy had been entangled by another country and forced to focus on A&N islands around that time, so that it could do little in the Indo-Pak war.
Great storytelling by our SG as always. This is why i am a subscriber. Btw, the more we find out about 62 and 65, the lower our opinion falls about our leadership post independence.
"Lost out" you make it sound like a cricket game and those snakes didn't know what they were doing.. say it openly, those snakes along with their terrorist manufacturing industry got defeated by us
Night fighting with IR light is extremely limited. Mostly a waste of resources because the battlefield would tend to be illuminated anyway. And IR is likely to draw attention to oneself. Which is why the Indian Centurions could prevail easily. IR lights on tanks were largely discredited in WW2.
@@desilions-e5m we had captured 1900 kmsqr of Pak territory including Haji Pir Pass while Pakistan had 580 sqkm. Add to this fact that you have started the war with the aim of taking Kashmir away from India and failed, then it looks like a textbook case of victory to me
@@brs802 My goodness, this is your version of misguided. Even though India is five times bigger, it has never managed to capture any Pakistani territory. Both sides may have small victories, but nothing major. It was India, not Pakistan, that started the war by attacking Lahore on September 6, 1965 International border. Pakistani fighters entered Kashmir, which the United Nations considers a disputed territory, just like India entered Junagarh. The Nawab of Junagarh wanted to join Pakistan. If India doesn't accept the Nawab’s decision, then we also don't accept Hari Singh’s decision for Kashmir to join India.
15:21 Shekhar ji, what about Gadra city in Rajasthan? As per sources available the city lost to Pakistan and now India has only Railway station part that is Gadra Road. ua-cam.com/video/OnsybrUG8V0/v-deo.htmlsi=srXdGbQYk0YOKmuM
The war starts with war aim. Pakistan did not achieve its war aim of wresting Kashmir valley from India . Pak has lost the war in not able to achieve its war aim. Individual battles of 1965 are a sideshow and not of importance
Before we rigged the 1987 state elections in Jammu and Kashmir, the kashmir Valley people were by and large a patriotic bunch, although there were some non violent and peaceful protests regarding the plebiscite which we promised them at the time of J&K's accession to India.
Kashmiris at that time had suffered in hands of afghan tribals who looted their properties and raped their women...1948 was still fresh ..these assholes today have forgotten
@@Rising._.Thunder very true..things went downhill post 1987 and in nineties ,after the Rubaiyya Sayid kidnapping, spiralled into violence. While elections in 1987 were held on Rajiv Gandhi's watch , things all over including in Punjab deteriorated during VP Singh's tenure as he ran a weak coalition
Please make this correction- you mentioned Chamb twice when you meant to say Kutch, while referring to the Pak test thrust (Desert Hawk) earlier in 1965.
There is a 2 minute timer all along the podcast.. As soon as it goes off, SG has to mention ".. a brilliant plan.. OR an audacious plan.. OR brilliant plan.." I think this is necessary to maintain the "balanced" and "unbiased" tag that is important beyond anything else for SG, irritation from repetition be damned..
Soviet Army had diesel engines in their tanks in WWII US Army decided to go diesel in 1950 Assam Uttar happened in 1965 1950 Army adopts the use of middle distillate fuels allowing use of diesel engines in ground vehicles.
So the same for West Bengal. Withdraw the statehood. Split West Bengal into two, Greater Calcutta and Rest of West Bengal. And make both Union territories, and keep it that way for at least 20 years, a generation. No local elections there.
historians, journos, citizens that love our countries and people will all be interested in knowing the complete stories. who dont want to acknowledge their blunders that cost men and honor - the politicians and the armed forces top brass . actually in all the wars, they were caught napping ( or passed out drunk from their parties) while the jawans get killed fighting with practically sticks and stones. everlasting shame
Just to give u some sense, the fight ended in a stalemate... both the countries didn't get any territory after the war....So i feel sorry for those who think Pakistan lost all 4 wars against India...we just lost 1 (1971) and also won one (1948)
lol. Pakistan never managed to defeat India;however Pakistan found the way of loosing even after having an edge in 1965 and chased away by India. India didn't have clear objectives apart from defending itself. Rest in 1948,Pak won against princely states force;Indian army then started to beating them like shit.
it was a bad stratage , Operation "Jablarter" was unsucessfull cause we were Not ready, "Mujahadin" were not train, they cant even speak Kashmiri, or 3 Armies Air , Navy.. were unaware about it, still 6th Sept when international Border was cross by India, we fight well with bravery but we loss what we started! it was a 'NO Stratagy'
No strategy in War, in Cricket, in Economy, in Science, in Technology. Pakistanis dont seem to have basic intelligence that Indians seem to possess. Why? I blame Islam.
I have read military leadership on both sides performed poorly,i think our army learned big time from this mishaps,we prepared and gifted Bangladesh in 1971.
Blame it on Nehru and his Khangressi policies for the imbalance of arms between Bharat & Pakistan... While Paksitan was arming itself to teeth, Bharatiya leader was smoking 555 and getting his clothes dry-cleaned from UK or visiting abroad for long durations or ensuring Somnath temple was not restored or gifting land to China under 'Hindi/Chini Bhai-Bhai policy or giving Bharat-Ratna to himself. Hats off to the Army that we could give a befitting reply, otherwise the leadership had decided to gift-wrap and present Kashmir to the perpetrators. EES GEE - What glee you have on your face highlighting enemies shenanigans; didn't know journalism has to trancend borders to be political correct...What a pity.
It’s easy to say all these things now. The priority then was poverty. To build top educational institutions and bring people out of poverty. India hardly had any money back then. It’s easy to be judgemental and not be rational
Oye Chutye Sanghi...where is ur source from WhatsApp University?? Even in 1965 Indian army was much stronger and has far better military leadership than Pakistani side. Tactically it was a stalemate but strategically it was an Indian victory because pakistan didn't achieve any of its aims
I don’t know why Indian journalists are obsessed with Pakistan. We should let Pakistan be what it wants to be - good, bad, ugly whatever. We have enough matters of our own to focus on. Establishment and ruling class of Pakistan are not well wisher of India. Listen to anyone talks and you can see all the biases and narrative they want to create - it comes out on the face.
PM Lal Bahadur Shastri 's little known repartee to President Gen . Ayub Khan of Pakistan.Gen Ayub was a hurly burly , Sandhurst trained Pathan. Ayub Khan used to feel very superior to Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji 's height. Lal Bahadur Shastri ( around Indo- Pak War of 1965 ) - "Gen Ayub Khan Kahate Hein Ki Yeh Hindustani Kya Ladengey. Yeh Log To Dhoti Pehentey Hain. "Mein Ayub Khan Ko Kehta Hoon - Phir Kya Agar Hum Neta log Dhoti Pehentey Hain. MERE JARNAIL TO PATLOON DALATEY HAIN. " -------------------- Another of him : Hamare pakistani bhai kehte thay ke nashta Amritsar mein aur dupahar ka khana Dilli mein hoga. Magar hum to abhi datun karne nikle thay, jo Lahore pahunch gaye" .
Dear SG, I very keenly watch your videos on UA-cam and your views on 1965 war have appeared in other videos/episodes as well. I notice that you never give us Indians the credit we deserve for war in 1965, as, in your view, for winning the war there has to be an objective. I feel that denying a better armed and a better trained Pakistan Army their objective itself should imply victory to India.
Gupta ji, you start with premis that Pakistan wanted to capture Kashmir and since it did not, it lost the war. In Pakistan, we look at it that with Operation Gibralter you had your tail between your legs and had it not been for change of command (probably under American pressure) you would have lost Kashmir. India attacked across international border that is why it was the aggressor. Despite being surprised, Pakistan blunted a much larger enemy. PAF completely knocked out IAF from skies. My father commanded an infantry battalion which won 5 gallantry awards.
Mr Masoom Mansoor, A nation which changes its commander under US pressure was hoping to win against a larger enemy. An army leadership, comprising a bunch of loonies, could not wargame properly and expect India to cross international border. As for the awards, in Pakistan , all generals sport a bucketful of medals on their chest, roughly proportionate to the DHA plots they knocked away!
@@srinathmitta661these Pakistani fools can't prepare a single car of there own and always talk of war these are the biggest fool on earth living in paradise with there hoors and fancy thoughts let it be
What about East Pakistan then ? Is it true as Pakistani reports suggest that in the earlier assault of Rann of Kutchh, the IAF wasn't put into use after a hotline discussion between Air marshals Arjan singh and Asgar khan ? If that's the case and PAF wasn't in action in the Rann of Kutchh, how was CM Balwantrai Mehta's helicopter shot ?
The air war we’ve spoken about in another episode and the Balwant Rai Mehta episode is there…I will try to update and republish soon.. thank you…Shekhar
Pakistan is the only country where no heads role when the army keeps on loosing it's territory. They lost in 1971 so badly that half of the country was lost. They lost in 1965. They lost very badly in 1999. Even AMERICANS did their thing in ABOTABAD & never informed them. Even now TALIBAN is in AFG but TTP is making their life miserable. Still possibly that's the only government model which works may be. It's only time which will tell if it really works, as the Islamization may be happening at a rapid pace.
Mr shekhar gupta. There are lot of boiling issues in my state which can be discussed like 10 years of continuous paper leak during bjp and congress government, open corruption in Rajasthan public service commission and inadequate investigation
65 was the most useless war. It destroyed the spirit of cordiality between the two neighbours that survived despite the horrors of partition. Pak/India need to learn from Malaysia and Singapore on how to peacefully coexist in spite of having painful memories of the past.
True. Trade was flourinshing between India and Pak till 1965. Considering it was Pakistan which attacked India, it should give up its Jihadis and surrender them to India. This will start a new era of progress. Till then India will continue to ignore Pakistan and be the fastest growing nation on Earth, while Pakistan goes from IMF program to another IMF program.
If pak stops their interference in Kashmir then we have nothing to do with pakistan, we neither have to prove anything against Pakistan nor we care about Pakistan. We want to compete with rest of the world to become economic and tech power. But Pakistan won't stop interfering in kashmir because it's the issue which have kept Pak Army in relevant and without Kashmir and phobia of India they will lost their relevance. Thus they will continue to meddle in Kashmir and we will never have normalcy in our relations
As per Pakistanis (who replied to me on there channels, possibly taught to them in Pak. Studies ) - 1) India lost Lahore. (Defence Day reason) 2) India lost lots of land in Rajasthan 😵💫 ( Jaisalmer, Jodhpur) 3) After LOSING Lots of Land in Rajasthan (Possibly Jaisalmer, Jodhpur), Pakistan army decided to launch attack towards India Gate, Delhi via Jaipur. 4. (India got shit scared & proposed ceasefire, peace deal) after Pak. Army neared India gate, Delhi & also seeing lahore response. 5. So technically we won 1965 war (Pak.) but Pak. Became internally weak and let to breakup in 1971. 6. India lost 2x equipment vs Pakistan hence they went for Peace Deal. I reality - 1) India lost more planes (50% more) because of surprise attack also technologically inferior too. 2) Pakistan lost more territory 1900 vs 540 sq kms. Here Massive mistake of giving back Haji Pir Pass of KASHMIR was committed 10kms inside POK. Would have provided alternative route to srinagar. 3) Local kashmiri valley residents blew cover of Pak. Infiltrators who wanted to take srinagar by force. (One of reasons why kashmir valley is still in India) 4) Pakistan lost between 300 min. To 450 tanks (Reason for breakup of Pakistan after 6 years as it took time to replish them & put in East.) 5) Pakistan lost more men 3800 to 6000 vs 2000 - 3000 for India. 6) India's Military Unprofessional, Lack of Coordination between IAF, ARMY exposed when Indian Army chief gave wrong Info. About India's weapons capacity (Remaining) to Shastri (India's PM) leading to Ceasefire. 7) Shastri ***** in Tashkent , as a result of His Peace Deal despite winning more territory. (Possible Reason, as many were against his soft response attitude throughout & loss of territory in Kutch sector).
During 1947 to 65 Indian Defense Policy and Strategy was Flying White Pigeons.............towards Pakistan and China........Both Kick on Back to India........
Sadly Indians don't tell the truth - look India outnumbered Pakistan in every aspect numerical and by law averages India should have steam rollered Pakstan and taken vast amount of it but it did not
@@Ankit__Shah why indians go to war if not to recover lost indian territories? Why lose soldiers unnecessarily if not retaking lost mother land? Where is your brain?😂
@@Red.bulldozer3 It's your brain which has malfunctioned, how many times do I need to tell you, we didn't started the war, nor did we wanted it. And so we wanted to stop them, from taking our territory, we had no intention of violence to solve conflicts.
Never underestimate your adversary! I just wanted to say a word of caution for you in Delhi. Neither Pakistan is the same country, nor would it spare India in any next adventure. You in Delhi must remember the post-Balakot scenario/results.
If Indian army had superiority over all aspects of warfare in 1965 then why Indian army had not captured lahore sialkot and other areas of Pakistan.we celebrate 6 September as our victory because Pakistan defended itself from a superior power who attacked Pakistan with the malicious aim of capturing lahore.
Congratulations. You won the 1965 war. Your tanks thundered down the plains of Indian Punjab and reached Delhi. Ayyub Khan sipped tea at the Lal Qila, Delhi. Indian PM fell at his feet begging for mercy. Pakistan Navy captured Mumbai, Goa, Cochin, Lakshadweep, Vishakapatnam and the Andaman Islands. Pakistan Air Force bombed the life out of Kolkata, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Patna and Hyderabad. Being large hearted, gracious Pakistanis forgave dirty Kafir Hindus and returned all the territory including the Kashmir valley.
Nobody is claiming India has superiority in all aspects. Pakistan had the better weapons. Even with better weapons and surprise attack you lost to us Hindus. How is this victory if you attacked us first and didn't gain anything? What did you win?
Your knowledge about war is poor.Haji peer was captured by Indian in 1971 not in 1965. Indra ghandi then PM of India personally moved to Haji peer to appreciate Indian Army.
Pakistan is globally a very sensitive geo-political area with an armed force 25% to 35% of India & unfortunately it had to protect two wings separated by 2000 kms of hostile territory. This is not the situation anymore & latest technology MLRS & potential missiles combined with a powerful air-force can overturn the table like Russians facing nato in Ukraine. Notwithstanding the above we still need backing of super-power to ensure transfer of latest military technology.
This hypocrisy is crazy so ur telling me befor the war started India took a strategic land of Pakistan but Pakistan started the war😂 mate taking someone’s land is a declaration of war try taking someone’s house n c if it’s war or not 😂
Exclusive content, privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/
``Country(Bangladesh) of Muslims'' - Mullah's boundless arrogance !
Islami Andolan Naib Amir Shaikh Charmonai Mufti Syed Muhammad Faizul Karim said, "Even if the country belongs to Muslims, everyone has rights." Celebrate Durga Puja in a bigger way than during Awami League. We will be by your side like a shadow. But the festival is for Hindus. Muslims can't be there.'(Source from Bangladeshi newspaperTime, 6 September 2024, Celebrate Durga Puja festival, I will be by your side like a shadow: Mufti Faizul Karim. সময়,৬ সেপ্টেম্বর ২০২৪,দুর্গাপূজা মহোৎসবে পালন করুন, ছায়ার মতো পাশে থাকব: মুফতি ফয়জুল করীম)
Rape cases in the Indian subcontinent, like in Kolkata, are inspired by the indian gods. When Shiva saw Mohini, he played with his penis & then raped her. Krishna was a playboy (his score 16,108 women)😮
Whenever you talk about Wars, the smile on your face reveals, how much you love militry tactics, strategy and its history.
That's because Shekhar Gupta is not only a journalist but also a war journalist with extensive experience and military historian.
Shekhar sir should do an episode on leaked Henderson bhagat report by Neville maxwell.
Mr Gupta Indians having the the population 10 time bigger and Army Air force Navy and armed budget 7 time bigger then Pakistan can perform much more better rather can be easily defeated Pakistan so there is no if and but and excuses admit it Pakistani instead of less very quantity they fought very bravely and here you don't forget 1000 year slavery when few thousand ruled your millions of ppls ....
@@mtrajpoot2659 First of all 1000 years was not slavery. 800 years, if u include muslim rules.
But that Muslim rule was not slavery.
They were king from different countries who came and won some kings in India. That was the norm those days.
India was under colonial rule and that was slavery.
@@BharatThatIsIndia .......dear Mr Bharat enjoy it and study FM Manik Shah book "The Man and his times " on 1971 war between India and Pakistan where Pak army was fighting with only 35000 soldiers one tank tank regiment 44 tank one artillery regiment one squadron 14 fighter saber 86 fighting ratio was 1 to 15 with Indian and without 0 supply from W Pakistan 1000 miles away ( this is all written in Manik Shah book )...you can study 🌾
Returning Haji Pir at Tashkent was a blunder.
It had to be done as nobody speaks it was bartered for Chhamb which we had lost.
@@pawanbrar did we get Chammb back ?
@@adityapatro4228 we got it back in 1965 but lost it permanently in 1971 😅
@@pawanbrar no comments
It was due to western pressure particularly American.
Even in 1971 indira ceeded 15000 sq km of western Pakistan to ayub in shimla agreement without any negotiations or concessions.
She fell for bhutto crying that said if he would go empty hand.. His military boss won't spare him in Pakistan.
The biggest & fundament mistake in Pakistan’s calculation was that India will not & never attack & cross International Border. Ayub Khan was assured by foreign office buy Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Pakistan had already reached Akhnur when India crossed the International borders in Lahore & taken totally unprepared, even its troops were on usual vacation.
pak punjabis will win anything through talk. champions of talk.
One of your best vlogs, if not the best. Detailed backgrounder, lucid description and focused explanation.
Thanks!
Dear Mr Sunit,
Thank you for the generous contribution you have made.
At 10:15, Mr Gupta mentions Chamb sector. It was Kutch and the op was Operation Desert Hawk.
Yes.
April, 1965
@@dineshpratapupadhyay6583 true
Bhai, here in Pakistan we know that 1965 our beloved army lost badly also
You are just a son of dagar dalli kanjari who iftar roza with indian kute pishap 😂
But everyone but the Pak army agrees
Only imrondooos not everyone 😂
@@TexasBoyDrew Depends on who is in the 'opposition.' 😀
@@Aashir61
Well said...👍👍👍
Why didn't Pakistan try to wrest Kashmir from India in 1962 but tried to do so in 1965? ------------- answer -----------
In 1962 Pakistan was not politically / diplomatically prepared to militarily annex Kashmir . In fact Pakistan was even prepared to help India to jointly face the Chinese threat ,
Further , Pakistan was then an Alliance partner of USA .USA had directed Pakistan not to open another front against India .
India , Pakistan , Chinese relations changed very dramatically after 1962 Pakistan under the guidance of Bhutto struck an anti India deal with China whereby , inter alia , Pakistan gifted / sold 5000 sq km plus of POK-i.e. Shaksgam Valley to China . By 1965 , Pakistan had China as an ally . Kennedy was gone in 1963 . Also , most important for Pakistan’s 1965 Indian attack decision Nehru had also died in 1964. Pakistan thought that the new Indian Prime Minister , Lal Bahadur Shastri was a weak and indecisive leader and lacked stature especially when compared to Nehru. PM Lal Bahadur Shastri ‘s weak personality image was further bolstered by PM Shastri ‘s , sort of appeasement of Pakistan in the Rann of Kutch crisis in early 1965
Most important factor for Pakistan ‘s decision to attack India in Kashmir in1965 was that after her defeat in 1962 , India had started expanding exponentially her armed forces both in numbers and equipment. Pakistan felt that if delayed further Pakistan , which was militarily superior to India till then , would never be able to wrest Kashmir from India. So ,Pakistan attacked Kashmir calculating that a weak Indian PM would keep the war limited to Kashmir. But PM Shastri with totally unexpected resolve , bravery and decisiveness .He counter attacked Pakistan across the International Border in Punjab forcing Pakistan to withdraw its forces from the Kashmir front and to , later , accept a ceasefire
Beautifully analysed ! Mr Nehru too committed a blunder in 1959 , by out rightly rejecting FM Ayub Khan’s proposal of Joint Defence Agreement.Mr Nehru rejected it by saying JOINT DEFENCE AGAINST WHOM! Had this agreement been accepted, it would have completely changed the whole course of history. Perhaps even Indo- China War of 1962 , might not have taken place!
Jenab @@iqbalkhattak948Sahib. Thanks and very your scholarly inputs.
@@iqbalkhattak948even during the course of War he turned down the proposal of Air Marshal Arjan Singh Ji of using India's Air force against China fearing broader escalation in reality it could have turned the tide of the war
@@joydip9044 Another reason for India’s failure was that the generals as professional soldiers knew very well that the Indian army was neither well equipped nor well trained for high altitude warfare, but they failed to apprise the PM of the ground realities. Mr Nehru, thought it would be a small little action ,sufficient for the image building of his favourite lt Gen BM Kaul as a strong candidate for the Chief’s slot! However , the whole operation was based on wrong assumptions! Had there been someone like FM Manekshaw, result would have been lot more different.
@@iqbalkhattak948 yes our soldiers lacked equipment as pandit Nehru being a pacifist in those days was not in favour of having an army with more weapons and equipments saddest fact is that at that time china was going through the worst famine of human history in which 4 crore Chinese people died still their Army was well equipped to outmaneuver us
I wish that the Pakistanis watch this episode because they have been simply lying forever that they won this war and India attacked them first. Will they ever really wake up?
They will never don't waste your energy
It was a stalemate, neither side had a decisive edge. Doesn't matter who started first, neither could conclude the end game.
Omitting facts to paint a rosy picture is the standard mode on both sides of the border.
This is what SG is doing for his Indian Audience and that's what many Pakistani journalists would do as well.
@@alis5040
It matters who started ? Pakistan had a objective and couldnt attain the objective and in a stalemate situtaion as per militiary practice it has to be considered to be lost,
however even if buy your arguement then why it is celebrated as victory in Pakistan, while as best it was Draw
@@alis5040 you want Kashmir? It's not Kashmir you are worried...it's more deeper hatred towards Hindus
why will they agree they survive on hating India.
Great and concise coverage of a very great stretch of history
India attacked Pakistan to take Lahore & Sialkot and failed. Pakistan take Khem Kiran. Kashmir remains as it as. End of Story.
Pakistan Zindabad.
These episodes are very important for India's history heritage and learning.
Dear SG ji, I believe you have already done CTC episode on 1965 war… I thought this was abridged version of your earlier episode… This episode is like Director Ram Gopal Verma remaking Sholay movie
Out of 4 wars India lost 3 wars this is known to everybody consult international defense magazines you will come to know everything.
Pakistan is now fighting a major battle with poverty. What went wrong? Wrong priorities?
Nothing happened....it's just the Islam. It's a big madarassa, nothing else.
@@neilbhatt7096it's not Islam it's hatred of India to only live to harm India 😂😂😂😂😂 priority or it's dollars army bajwa billionaires
The poverty in Pakistan is still lower to India. You still won't see bhooke nangay log sleeping at roadside like india where it is a common site.
@@umairahmed7704 sorry India official lifted 1.3 billion people out of poverty in 75 yrs source U.N our poverty is 13% decreasing yoy. By welfare schemes digitalization education etc.
Youth literacy 96%, inflation 4%
Pakistan in poverty 45%
30 to 40% inflation it will push 60% to 70% poverty in coming years.
Population controlled in India 2% fertility
Pakistan 4 to 5% still fertility
Pakistan 70% budget interest payment
India 13% budget interest payment
India gst tax 140 crore tax payers.
@@umairahmed7704 Pakistan had all the advantages of a small strategic nation near central and west asia when it formed. But the leaders of the country were greedy and did not lead well at all, resulting in the degradation of most of these benefits. Had they been more lucky with their leaders and created more just and transparent societies without extremism, they could have had better living standards than present day India.
Unfortunately, current day Pakistan is very much behind India in most living standard metrics (40 % poverty rate too), but who cares...the people of Pakistan have become very proficient at looking away from their problems over the years, so what could ever be wrong with the most glorious (Pak) islamic nation of all.
Pakistan lost all wars to India
Pakistan army = Surrender army 😂😂😂
Indians specially indian hindus think that they won every war but forget their 1948 defeat by Pakistan & liberation of half Kashmir known as Azad Kashmir & Gilgit Baltistan also defeated badly in 1965 war from Pakistan & these black skin badbudaar hindus thinks they won every war with Pakistan, 1000 years of muslim's slaves 😂😂😂
Then how come indians lost POK to pakustan 😂
british won pok dumbass
@@Red.bulldozer3 How can we lose something we never had?
@@daddashikamani then why indians are still claiming whole of kashmir if in the first place it is not theirs 😂
Interesting information.
Hi,
Thank you once again for contributing towards our journalism.
Most of the operational plans are made/ built on highly attractive and appealing assumptions, but in reality absolutely wrong assumptions which in most of our subcontinent’s environments have failed ! I agree with Mr Gupta that 1965 War was a meaningless war of mutual incompetence. Realistically speaking strategically Pakistan suffered far more than India though tactically on quite a few fronts Pakistan’s performance can be regarded as satisfactory . Pakistan also failed in exploitation of initial successes! Both sides in 3 weeks time , ran out of the Staff Colleges Pink Solutions and had to agree to a ceasefire! Material losses were huge with no substantial results.
Most of the researchers have now arrived at the conclusion that 1965 was a blunder committed by FM Ayub Khan. Had he not gone to war with India, Pakistan would have economically and politically progressed far better in the region . It would have been totally a different history.
How I wish Shastri had continued as PM for many years . A great incorruptible person. That would have prevented the Family from having a stranglehold over the Congress.
The other point you mentioned is Abdul Hamid getting Param Vir Chakra. Such news should be publicized in today's hate-filled days
Article 370 was not made irrelevant.. it was abrogated…. Shekar improve ur English….
he's right - over the decades it was made irrelevant - modi just made it formally obsolete
This is Ganga becoming Chandramuki Phase for SG
Very informative. Thank you
been watching sg for 5 years now, remember watching the video he posted on the '65 war back in 2019, sheeeeeesh. it's been a long long time.
Sir
thank you for the 60th 1965 Indo pak war
Our congradtulation to the Brave indan soldiers
All indians must pray for the soldiers died and their families
Thank Lal Bhadur sastri
Jai Jawan
jai kisan
Jai india
Thank you sir for that wonderful and gripping narration.
I found the book by journalist Nitin Gokhale on the 1965 war to be very accessible and well-written. The most interesting but is how the Indian Navy had been entangled by another country and forced to focus on A&N islands around that time, so that it could do little in the Indo-Pak war.
Great storytelling by our SG as always. This is why i am a subscriber. Btw, the more we find out about 62 and 65, the lower our opinion falls about our leadership post independence.
Thank you, my friend. I'm glad you enjoyed this episode. Do keep watching and writing in...best wishes, Shekhar
Pakistan lost? We returned extremely strategic Haji Pir Pass back to Pakistan, a great loss for us!
Its like this :
Pak attacks India.(Fcuk around)
India retaliates.( Finds out)
Pakistan celebrates “find out” as national defence day
😂
Sirji , you missed another important pre-event of the 1965 war, the Rann of Kutch skirmish, the precursor of the main attack.
That deserves a separate episode at some point I suppose! Will do for sure..thank you
"Lost out" you make it sound like a cricket game and those snakes didn't know what they were doing.. say it openly, those snakes along with their terrorist manufacturing industry got defeated by us
Night fighting with IR light is extremely limited. Mostly a waste of resources because the battlefield would tend to be illuminated anyway. And IR is likely to draw attention to oneself.
Which is why the Indian Centurions could prevail easily.
IR lights on tanks were largely discredited in WW2.
Winning a war from Pakistan is easy but get deceased claim from state bank of India is so tough if all the siblings are differently located. 😢😢
We didn’t win the 65 war. Pak lost it
Add a nominee before death and it becomes super easy. Bank also has to save its skin in case of dispute between siblings in the future.
I am surprised to see how fooled the Indian audience is that they have won the WAR and what territory they have taken in 1965?
@@desilions-e5m we had captured 1900 kmsqr of Pak territory including Haji Pir Pass while Pakistan had 580 sqkm. Add to this fact that you have started the war with the aim of taking Kashmir away from India and failed, then it looks like a textbook case of victory to me
@@brs802 My goodness, this is your version of misguided. Even though India is five times bigger, it has never managed to capture any Pakistani territory. Both sides may have small victories, but nothing major. It was India, not Pakistan, that started the war by attacking Lahore on September 6, 1965 International border. Pakistani fighters entered Kashmir, which the United Nations considers a disputed territory, just like India entered Junagarh. The Nawab of Junagarh wanted to join Pakistan. If India doesn't accept the Nawab’s decision, then we also don't accept Hari Singh’s decision for Kashmir to join India.
Excellent explanation thank you very much sir
15:21 Shekhar ji, what about Gadra city in Rajasthan? As per sources available the city lost to Pakistan and now India has only Railway station part that is Gadra Road.
ua-cam.com/video/OnsybrUG8V0/v-deo.htmlsi=srXdGbQYk0YOKmuM
The war starts with war aim. Pakistan did not achieve its war aim of wresting Kashmir valley from India . Pak has lost the war in not able to achieve its war aim. Individual battles of 1965 are a sideshow and not of importance
I think around minute 10:17 Shekhar by mistake mentioned Chamb section. Did he actually meant to say the Sir creek sector?
Yes, that was a slip of the tongue. I meant Kutchch sector..thanks for pointing out …Shekhar
I didn't knew kashmiri people helped india in 1965 war
Before we rigged the 1987 state elections in Jammu and Kashmir, the kashmir Valley people were by and large a patriotic bunch, although there were some non violent and peaceful protests regarding the plebiscite which we promised them at the time of J&K's accession to India.
Kashmiris at that time had suffered in hands of afghan tribals who looted their properties and raped their women...1948 was still fresh ..these assholes today have forgotten
Kashmiris are very nice people.
In 1999 Kargil war too local shepherds alerted the Indian Army
@@Rising._.Thunder very true..things went downhill post 1987 and in nineties ,after the Rubaiyya Sayid kidnapping, spiralled into violence. While elections in 1987 were held on Rajiv Gandhi's watch , things all over including in Punjab deteriorated during VP Singh's tenure as he ran a weak coalition
See how PAK is trying to insult our hero who won the 1971 war for us
Most of the war plans were designed by Major Gen. J.F.R JACOB, who successfully negotiated THE PUBLIC SURRENDER OF PAKISTANIS.
Quite the take by Shekhar sb.
Please make this correction- you mentioned Chamb twice when you meant to say Kutch, while referring to the Pak test thrust (Desert Hawk) earlier in 1965.
Yes, that was a slip,of the tongue. Thanks for pointing out. Will put in a correction…shekharv
Very fair analysis
A book on the same, "History of Indo-Pak War 1965" by Lt Gen Mahmud Ahmed is worth reading and is highly recommended .
This is where SG is at his best
There is a 2 minute timer all along the podcast.. As soon as it goes off, SG has to mention ".. a brilliant plan.. OR an audacious plan.. OR brilliant plan.." I think this is necessary to maintain the "balanced" and "unbiased" tag that is important beyond anything else for SG, irritation from repetition be damned..
Shekhar ji, One correction. Major General Nasir Ahmed Khan was not injured in the Battle of Khem Karan, but was KIA.
Well shekhar you are living and breating historical book...who first hand saw some historical events
Pakistan ki qaum hi bekar hai😂😂 I love India, from Pakistan. Pakistan zindabadh
Good
Nice described
Is 1515 available in hindi ?
You are not highlighting that it chased Pak, long in its territory,which is a victory.why not happy with win?
Soviet Army had diesel engines in their tanks in WWII
US Army decided to go diesel in 1950
Assam Uttar happened in 1965
1950
Army adopts the use of middle distillate fuels allowing use of diesel engines in ground vehicles.
So the same for West Bengal. Withdraw the statehood. Split West Bengal into two, Greater Calcutta and Rest of West Bengal.
And make both Union territories, and keep it that way for at least 20 years, a generation.
No local elections there.
Sanghi gobar mind spotted
WoW Deisel vs Petrol in Tank and Practical Innovation 💡
historians, journos, citizens that love our countries and people will all be interested in knowing the complete stories. who dont want to acknowledge their blunders that cost men and honor - the politicians and the armed forces top brass . actually in all the wars, they were caught napping ( or passed out drunk from their parties) while the jawans get killed fighting with practically sticks and stones. everlasting shame
Just to give u some sense, the fight ended in a stalemate... both the countries didn't get any territory after the war....So i feel sorry for those who think Pakistan lost all 4 wars against India...we just lost 1 (1971) and also won one (1948)
lol. Pakistan never managed to defeat India;however Pakistan found the way of loosing even after having an edge in 1965 and chased away by India. India didn't have clear objectives apart from defending itself. Rest in 1948,Pak won against princely states force;Indian army then started to beating them like shit.
it was a bad stratage , Operation "Jablarter" was unsucessfull cause we were Not ready, "Mujahadin" were not train, they cant even speak Kashmiri, or 3 Armies Air , Navy.. were unaware about it, still 6th Sept when international Border was cross by India, we fight well with bravery but we loss what we started! it was a 'NO Stratagy'
No strategy in War, in Cricket, in Economy, in Science, in Technology.
Pakistanis dont seem to have basic intelligence that Indians seem to possess. Why? I blame Islam.
I have read military leadership on both sides performed poorly,i think our army learned big time from this mishaps,we prepared and gifted Bangladesh in 1971.
Blame it on Nehru and his Khangressi policies for the imbalance of arms between Bharat & Pakistan... While Paksitan was arming itself to teeth, Bharatiya leader was smoking 555 and getting his clothes dry-cleaned from UK or visiting abroad for long durations or ensuring Somnath temple was not restored or gifting land to China under 'Hindi/Chini Bhai-Bhai policy or
giving Bharat-Ratna to himself. Hats off to the Army that we could give a befitting reply, otherwise the leadership had decided to gift-wrap and present Kashmir to the perpetrators. EES GEE - What glee you have on your face highlighting enemies shenanigans; didn't know journalism has to trancend borders to be political correct...What a pity.
It’s easy to say all these things now. The priority then was poverty. To build top educational institutions and bring people out of poverty. India hardly had any money back then. It’s easy to be judgemental and not be rational
Oye Chutye Sanghi...where is ur source from WhatsApp University?? Even in 1965 Indian army was much stronger and has far better military leadership than Pakistani side. Tactically it was a stalemate but strategically it was an Indian victory because pakistan didn't achieve any of its aims
Open a book, child.
@@praneethpragallapati4983he didn’t do that properly either ..
CUPTA JI TUSSI GREAT HO
I don’t know why Indian journalists are obsessed with Pakistan. We should let Pakistan be what it wants to be - good, bad, ugly whatever. We have enough matters of our own to focus on. Establishment and ruling class of Pakistan are not well wisher of India. Listen to anyone talks and you can see all the biases and narrative they want to create - it comes out on the face.
PM Lal Bahadur Shastri 's little known repartee to President Gen . Ayub Khan of Pakistan.Gen Ayub was a hurly burly , Sandhurst trained Pathan. Ayub Khan used to feel very superior to Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji 's height. Lal Bahadur Shastri ( around Indo- Pak War of 1965 ) - "Gen Ayub Khan Kahate Hein Ki Yeh Hindustani Kya Ladengey. Yeh Log To Dhoti Pehentey Hain. "Mein Ayub Khan Ko Kehta Hoon - Phir Kya Agar Hum Neta log Dhoti Pehentey Hain. MERE JARNAIL TO PATLOON DALATEY HAIN. " --------------------
Another of him : Hamare pakistani bhai kehte thay ke nashta Amritsar mein aur dupahar ka khana Dilli mein hoga. Magar hum to abhi datun karne nikle thay, jo Lahore pahunch gaye" .
This is to all those who bash Shekhar ji as Modi hater
Dear SG, I very keenly watch your videos on UA-cam and your views on 1965 war have appeared in other videos/episodes as well. I notice that you never give us Indians the credit we deserve for war in 1965, as, in your view, for winning the war there has to be an objective. I feel that denying a better armed and a better trained Pakistan Army their objective itself should imply victory to India.
You must be at loss that they lost...
In meantime you are happy about the 1962 sino war
Forget the past ,talk about present and future events likely to come.
This person is an apologist for Pakistan .
something about 'Havildar' Abdul Hameed PvC didn't sound right and I googled and I was right.. It's Company Quartermaster Havaldar Abdul Hameed (PvC)
Gupta ji, you start with premis that Pakistan wanted to capture Kashmir and since it did not, it lost the war. In Pakistan, we look at it that with Operation Gibralter you had your tail between your legs and had it not been for change of command (probably under American pressure) you would have lost Kashmir. India attacked across international border that is why it was the aggressor. Despite being surprised, Pakistan blunted a much larger enemy. PAF completely knocked out IAF from skies. My father commanded an infantry battalion which won 5 gallantry awards.
Mr Masoom Mansoor, A nation which changes its commander under US pressure was hoping to win against a larger enemy. An army leadership, comprising a bunch of loonies, could not wargame properly and expect India to cross international border. As for the awards, in Pakistan , all generals sport a bucketful of medals on their chest, roughly proportionate to the DHA plots they knocked away!
But still you people trying to capture Kashmir hahaha but couldn't able to take a inch of it and ballbering here
@@srinathmitta661these Pakistani fools can't prepare a single car of there own and always talk of war these are the biggest fool on earth living in paradise with there hoors and fancy thoughts let it be
What about East Pakistan then ? Is it true as Pakistani reports suggest that in the earlier assault of Rann of Kutchh, the IAF wasn't put into use after a hotline discussion between Air marshals Arjan singh and Asgar khan ? If that's the case and PAF wasn't in action in the Rann of Kutchh, how was CM Balwantrai Mehta's helicopter shot ?
The air war we’ve spoken about in another episode and the Balwant Rai Mehta episode is there…I will try to update and republish soon.. thank you…Shekhar
Pakistan wanted capture kashmir but result east pakistan lost. Pakistan defeated in all war.
Pakistan is the only country where no heads role when the army keeps on loosing it's territory. They lost in 1971 so badly that half of the country was lost. They lost in 1965. They lost very badly in 1999. Even AMERICANS did their thing in ABOTABAD & never informed them. Even now TALIBAN is in AFG but TTP is making their life miserable. Still possibly that's the only government model which works may be. It's only time which will tell if it really works, as the Islamization may be happening at a rapid pace.
We saw so many patton tank left by them
So much for Nehru’s preparation of India for war and even self defence.
What a traitor?
Mr shekhar gupta. There are lot of boiling issues in my state which can be discussed like 10 years of continuous paper leak during bjp and congress government, open corruption in Rajasthan public service commission and inadequate investigation
1965 war was for Lahore from india but they failed badly and lost.
65 was the most useless war. It destroyed the spirit of cordiality between the two neighbours that survived despite the horrors of partition. Pak/India need to learn from Malaysia and Singapore on how to peacefully coexist in spite of having painful memories of the past.
first pak needs to learn
It was kargil which finished every hope of peace and showed the world that Pakistan can not be trusted
True. Trade was flourinshing between India and Pak till 1965.
Considering it was Pakistan which attacked India, it should give up its Jihadis and surrender them to India. This will start a new era of progress.
Till then India will continue to ignore Pakistan and be the fastest growing nation on Earth, while Pakistan goes from IMF program to another IMF program.
If pak stops their interference in Kashmir then we have nothing to do with pakistan, we neither have to prove anything against Pakistan nor we care about Pakistan. We want to compete with rest of the world to become economic and tech power. But Pakistan won't stop interfering in kashmir because it's the issue which have kept Pak Army in relevant and without Kashmir and phobia of India they will lost their relevance. Thus they will continue to meddle in Kashmir and we will never have normalcy in our relations
Not India Pakistan should learn
India Never attack first
Pakistan always surrendered....
Pak lost because mr sekar Gupta was not a consultant to Pak.😂😂😂😂😂
As per Pakistanis (who replied to me on there channels, possibly taught to them in Pak. Studies ) -
1) India lost Lahore. (Defence Day reason)
2) India lost lots of land in Rajasthan 😵💫 ( Jaisalmer, Jodhpur)
3) After LOSING Lots of Land in Rajasthan (Possibly Jaisalmer, Jodhpur), Pakistan army decided to launch attack towards India Gate, Delhi via Jaipur.
4. (India got shit scared & proposed ceasefire, peace deal) after Pak. Army neared India gate, Delhi & also seeing lahore response.
5. So technically we won 1965 war (Pak.) but Pak. Became internally weak and let to breakup in 1971.
6. India lost 2x equipment vs Pakistan hence they went for Peace Deal.
I reality -
1) India lost more planes (50% more) because of surprise attack also technologically inferior too.
2) Pakistan lost more territory 1900 vs 540 sq kms. Here Massive mistake of giving back Haji Pir Pass of KASHMIR was committed 10kms inside POK. Would have provided alternative route to srinagar.
3) Local kashmiri valley residents blew cover of Pak. Infiltrators who wanted to take srinagar by force. (One of reasons why kashmir valley is still in India)
4) Pakistan lost between 300 min. To 450 tanks (Reason for breakup of Pakistan after 6 years as it took time to replish them & put in East.)
5) Pakistan lost more men 3800 to 6000 vs 2000 - 3000 for India.
6) India's Military Unprofessional, Lack of Coordination between IAF, ARMY exposed when Indian Army chief gave wrong Info. About India's weapons capacity (Remaining) to Shastri (India's PM) leading to Ceasefire.
7) Shastri ***** in Tashkent , as a result of His Peace Deal despite winning more territory. (Possible Reason, as many were against his soft response attitude throughout & loss of territory in Kutch sector).
what are your views on Madhabi Buch allegations? do you see them as possible 'conflict of interest' OR 'corruption'?
During 1947 to 65 Indian Defense Policy and Strategy was Flying White Pigeons.............towards Pakistan and China........Both Kick on Back to India........
Sadly Indians don't tell the truth - look India outnumbered Pakistan in every aspect numerical and by law averages India should have steam rollered Pakstan and taken vast amount of it but it did not
Its a shame indians with a larger army, weapons, population cannot defeat pakistan once for all and recapture lost kashmir territories.🤦🏼
😅 zero comment value nobody remembers
@@80sidd Do the indians still remember lost territories to pakustan and china?😂
@@Red.bulldozer3 That wasn't our objective, we didn't started the war. Don't you understand this little fact.
@@Ankit__Shah why indians go to war if not to recover lost indian territories?
Why lose soldiers unnecessarily if not retaking lost mother land?
Where is your brain?😂
@@Red.bulldozer3 It's your brain which has malfunctioned, how many times do I need to tell you, we didn't started the war, nor did we wanted it. And so we wanted to stop them, from taking our territory, we had no intention of violence to solve conflicts.
This is the problem with anti-national media...Heading should have been "Bharat Won in 1965"... shameless title
Dear sir you have not responded on lhatakhat scheme & congress states becoming bankrupt
It seems it is not of any national interest to you
Never underestimate your adversary! I just wanted to say a word of caution for you in Delhi. Neither Pakistan is the same country, nor would it spare India in any next adventure. You in Delhi must remember the post-Balakot scenario/results.
First plz try to have aata for ur roti and clean water for ur people then talk of war
@@GaneshSingh-h6c That is a very legitimate pointer you have mentioned for the Pakistanis. What about 800 million Indians living below poverty?
@@GaneshSingh-h6c That is a very legitimate pointer you have mentioned for the Pakistanis. What about 800 million Indians living below poverty?
@@zaffazad4040 it's less then 5% now in 2023 educate yourself Idiot. By the way in Pakistan Below poverty rate is 36% read UN report
@@zaffazad4040 actually it is 100 mil. you are off by 10 yrs. Yes hence we dont stand wars.
If Indian army had superiority over all aspects of warfare in 1965 then why Indian army had not captured lahore sialkot and other areas of Pakistan.we celebrate 6 September as our victory because Pakistan defended itself from a superior power who attacked Pakistan with the malicious aim of capturing lahore.
Congratulations.
You won the 1965 war.
Your tanks thundered down the plains of Indian Punjab and reached Delhi.
Ayyub Khan sipped tea at the Lal Qila, Delhi.
Indian PM fell at his feet begging for mercy.
Pakistan Navy captured Mumbai, Goa, Cochin, Lakshadweep, Vishakapatnam and the Andaman Islands.
Pakistan Air Force bombed the life out of Kolkata, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Patna and Hyderabad.
Being large hearted, gracious Pakistanis forgave dirty Kafir Hindus and returned all the territory including the Kashmir valley.
Congratulations for winning the war, remember there is no war in ba sing se
Nobody is claiming India has superiority in all aspects. Pakistan had the better weapons.
Even with better weapons and surprise attack you lost to us Hindus. How is this victory if you attacked us first and didn't gain anything? What did you win?
Pakistan Army had better tanks and planes and yet lost
Oh Man! This guy still didn’t understand the video
How & Why The War Ended 🤔
Cowards
who call
Field marshal Mankshaw
Briliant general
Highly respected all soldier
Your knowledge about war is poor.Haji peer was captured by Indian in 1971 not in 1965. Indra ghandi then PM of India personally moved to Haji peer to appreciate Indian Army.
Pakistan is globally a very sensitive geo-political area with an armed force 25% to 35% of India & unfortunately it had to protect two wings separated by 2000 kms of hostile territory. This is not the situation anymore & latest technology MLRS & potential missiles combined with a powerful air-force can overturn the table like Russians facing nato in Ukraine. Notwithstanding the above we still need backing of super-power to ensure transfer of latest military technology.
SG's obsession with pak*Stan is endless
Jai Hind. Please free Pakistan, we want to be part of One India.
We had a great Prime Minister after a worst Prime Minister. ie Nehru
Bhai jee k hath pakar lo to bhaiya bol nahi payen gai 😅
Why did India surrender Haji Pir, Any Clue, Was it due to intense pressure from Soviets who wanted the mediation to succeed ?? ANy Answers
سناتن دھرم راستہ ہے
Sachi baat hey ke 1965 mey kashmirio ney bharat ka saath diya thaa is liye aaj tak uski wimmat chuka rahey hey aur yeh bharati aaj tak pakistani agent boltey rahetey hey.
This hypocrisy is crazy so ur telling me befor the war started India took a strategic land of Pakistan but Pakistan started the war😂 mate taking someone’s land is a declaration of war try taking someone’s house n c if it’s war or not 😂