45 years to Zia’s coup & how his is the most lasting impact on India, Pakistan & the world

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 782

  • @ThePrintIndia
    @ThePrintIndia  2 роки тому +24

    Early access, exclusive content, special privileges - Discover the great benefits of being a Member of ThePrint’s UA-cam channel. Take a Paid Membership today. It costs just Rs 159/month.
    ua-cam.com/channels/uyRsHZILrU7ZDIAbGASHdA.htmljoin

    • @shreekantkumarsahu9570
      @shreekantkumarsahu9570 2 роки тому

      DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY ON HINDUPHOBIC LEFTWING TERRORISTS NEWSPAPER

    • @commodusmeridius4718
      @commodusmeridius4718 2 роки тому +2

      Both zias
      One in Bd another in Pak

    • @VijayKumar-gr3ld
      @VijayKumar-gr3ld 2 роки тому

      St ggh to DD DDD ddddxd XSt dXD St dd5 ft 6tdXxDaddy dD funnyd 6û66xyXxxdxdXxddx6y5 DD Xx funny SST

    • @sunitarana8921
      @sunitarana8921 2 роки тому

      Pppppppppppp pppp my pppppppppppppppp pp 0 ppp0pp00000p pp pp pp plum PPP pppp pp PPP po po pppp ppp0p0ppppppppppppp pp 0p PPP pppppppp

    • @sharique38
      @sharique38 2 роки тому

      you are godi media

  • @srikanthxxxxx
    @srikanthxxxxx 2 роки тому +216

    "Partyless democracy is like non-alcoholic beer" 😂. Good god, Shekhar ji. Gimme 20k and I'll come work for you.

    • @adityask277
      @adityask277 2 роки тому +3

      He is a man of culture✌️😂😂

    • @fretted4life
      @fretted4life 2 роки тому +5

      Having tried non-alcoholic despite not liking beer at all. I'd rather have alcoholic beer with tht bitter taste.

    • @sundareshkrishna6457
      @sundareshkrishna6457 2 роки тому +4

      I will work free…… but beer will be on SG sir, not non alcoholic one at that….

    • @LonDanDoc
      @LonDanDoc 2 роки тому

      Wait 20k a month or year. And rupee's? Dollars? Pounds?

    • @kimcantswim174
      @kimcantswim174 2 роки тому +6

      @@LonDanDoc Twenty thousand camels. One time payment.

  • @homayuns2165
    @homayuns2165 2 роки тому +114

    I am originally from Afghanistan but live in USA . I really appreciate your analysis. That was probably one of the major events of the 20th century after world war 1 and 2.

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 роки тому

      The Grand Indus Army owns, occupies and ru(i)ns Pakistan enforcing Britain's messianic ideology in the region of everlasting hostility towards Russia (The Great Game) for a fistful of $$$ and a few $$$ more. India, Afghanistan, Central Asia, China and Russia should form a strategic alliance to liberate the Indus Valley from British & US influence and then aim for Eurasian Integration to overtake the US as the most powerful economic, military and political power in the world. ua-cam.com/video/Bwvl5gGrmdA/v-deo.html

  • @sankalp6872
    @sankalp6872 2 роки тому +260

    Why the obsession with Zia? Interesting, how people like to find one person/event to lay the blame upon. Pakistan was rotten long before Zia. Pakistan was never a country. It was a "jaagir" for Muslim elites who feared economic/political alienation in a "secular" India. Jinnah was merely a broker. Once religious "high" was over, these elites pinned the obsession of people on Kashmir and India. It was none other than the "secular" Bhutto who declared the "thousand years war" against India which was later shaped into "Bleed India by thousand cuts" by Zia. So when people blame Zia for fundamentalism, they are wrong. Pakistan was born out of fundamentalism.

    • @Movieplaytoon306
      @Movieplaytoon306 2 роки тому +7

      very gd observation... 👍

    • @Earlytorise89
      @Earlytorise89 2 роки тому

      This.

    • @drunkenmonk2767
      @drunkenmonk2767 2 роки тому +12

      He is trying very hard to get in good books of LeLi gang, this is my observation cause he was fairly neutral untill 2017 but something happened in '19 which seems making him rally towards LeLi...

    • @sdp2792
      @sdp2792 2 роки тому +1

      Very well put.

    • @secularcommieturdpracharak8321
      @secularcommieturdpracharak8321 2 роки тому +11

      After I finish watching CTC, I always make sure I scroll down to read your astute observations on various topics...I think you should write opinion pieces in the Print
      Keep them comments coming

  • @nihalpathak3407
    @nihalpathak3407 2 роки тому +74

    If not Zia there would have been some other person to fill his shoes. The mentality he represented was always there, which is quite evident from that country's history before Zia (1947-1977). In 1971 they killed 3 million Bengalis, attacked India several times. They also had already used their non state actors during 1947 and 65 wars. They had already banned Ahmadiya sect. I also don't agree with you on Jinnah. He said different things to different people on different occasions. What actually matters is not his words but his actions.

    • @bharatindian6633
      @bharatindian6633 2 роки тому +6

      Zia impacted the Indian librandus only, no one else in india.

    • @HashiramaSenyu
      @HashiramaSenyu 2 роки тому

      3 million Bengalis !!!

    • @parth1511
      @parth1511 2 роки тому +1

      Correct CIA might have brought some other stooge.

  • @Arwar555
    @Arwar555 2 роки тому +21

    Indira Gandhi. She is THE WOMAN!! May she rest in peace. As a Bangladeshi i absolutely loved that woman. She in her saree did all the globe trotting to help form Bangladesh. Many lives were saved by her due to her actions. Far far far more important than Zia ul Haq.!!!

    • @sanjaycharan4682
      @sanjaycharan4682 2 роки тому +6

      I agree with you 100%

    • @raghunandan9290
      @raghunandan9290 Рік тому

      Angoke could have broken Pakistan.
      Its the army which did job
      India has great institutions.
      Credit can't be given to one man

    • @dk-zp5ze
      @dk-zp5ze Рік тому

      @@raghunandan9290 it was a tactical decision by Indira Gandhi with army chief sam manekshaw. it's either this or huge cost rehabilitating the refugees

  • @aliiqbal6310
    @aliiqbal6310 2 роки тому +38

    One important thing which I guess should be highlighted is that he used the time during soviet war very smartly by building nuclear weapons technology very quickly, he knew that right now americans need him to defeat soviets so he used this opportunity and made quick progress to build nuclear weapons and Americans remained mum in this time period.

    • @civilp2689
      @civilp2689 2 роки тому +3

      he was anti-islamic

    • @thyagarajanriyer3284
      @thyagarajanriyer3284 2 роки тому +7

      net result is he ruined pakistan forever by injecting radicalisation🤣🤣🤣

    • @thyagarajanriyer3284
      @thyagarajanriyer3284 2 роки тому +1

      Education, economic prosperity, innovation, communal harmony, freedom for citizens etc. make the country progress fast. Such a country becomes useful for rest of the world.
      In case any of these are absent and if such a country has just nuclear weapons, then such a country becomes a pure headache for the world.
      Such countries will be gradually destroyed by rest of the world by using the leaders of the country itself.
      Example - North Korea, Pakistan, Russia.

    • @jameshardley9793
      @jameshardley9793 Рік тому +1

      Nuke program was established and started by ZA Bhutto long before Manhoos Zia took over. That was a major reasons for Bhutto hanging and murder by ZIA. Bhutto had built the Lab and left at least 300 million dollars cash, Zia had no choice but to continue. He destroyed Pakistan

  • @tharunreddy24
    @tharunreddy24 2 роки тому +175

    This episode has completely misplaced timing and priority. We have discussed Zia many times in prior episodes. We could have discussed Shinzo Abe's death and it's impact on certain policies that Japanese government may take, rupee crisis and why we are not exporting as much as we aim for, Sri Lanka's govt collapse and what can be a permanent solution to its financial crisis etc etc.

    • @ashwinghadvir9109
      @ashwinghadvir9109 2 роки тому

      Aggred ,Shinzo abe!!!,

    • @Sid-MMA
      @Sid-MMA 2 роки тому +7

      Andh bhakt's comment .

    • @kishoremandyam8245
      @kishoremandyam8245 2 роки тому +5

      Buddy it is apt and much needed for Indian youngsters because
      YOGI LIKELY TO FOLLOW IN SAME PATH working with Democrats of USA
      BUT WITH WAY WORSE CONSEQUENCES FOR INDIA , ASIA AND THE WORLD
      Kamala will want to use Yogi against China Like Carter used Zia against USSR, BUT this war won't be just minor but likely to lead to nuclear apocalyptic ww3

    • @RahulSharma-jm9ir
      @RahulSharma-jm9ir 2 роки тому

      @@kishoremandyam8245 bro let him became prime minister first. you are making so much assumptions

    • @kishoremandyam8245
      @kishoremandyam8245 2 роки тому +2

      @@RahulSharma-jm9ir just like Bhutto had picked Zia over many seniors Modi / Rss will pick Yogi same way
      That also will be similar to Zia story

  • @jeweltilak767
    @jeweltilak767 2 роки тому +43

    Zia looks like a Bollywood villain

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +10

      Exactly.

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 роки тому

      He's a sepoy Third Class.

    • @Deb_deCoder
      @Deb_deCoder 2 роки тому

      villian is far better.. he was a back-stabber who won trust of bhutto, then bhutto promoted him and lastly he kyld that same man bhutto with fake charges.. all within 3 years.. pak history is full of traitors like this.. Iskander mirza, the great-grandson of mirzafar, also betrayed gulam mohammad to get presidency, mirza dismissed gulam while gulam set him as acting governor before going to hospital for treatment.. most mullahs are like this.. never trust any of them

  • @sameeransari6649
    @sameeransari6649 2 роки тому +28

    Under Zia rule Pakistan lost siachin glacier to indian army in 1984 and Benazir even offered her bangles to Zia and Pakistan army for humiliated defeat in siachin

  • @veteran4226
    @veteran4226 2 роки тому +18

    Gen Zia ul Haq (mard e mujhahid) was the person who dug the grave of Pakistan. And he did his work quiet efficiently, I must say.

  • @DubAGoor98
    @DubAGoor98 2 роки тому +26

    Thanks! Keep up the good work shekarji especially cut the clutter and national interest

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 роки тому +2

      Hi, thanks for you feedback and supporting our channel.

  • @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239
    @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239 2 роки тому +59

    It's contradictory to state that Zia "Islamized" Pakistan; The very premise of Pakistan was political Islam; All Zia might have done is to instutionalize that!

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 роки тому

      Pakistan was created just after the start of the Cold War as a military base for Britain and its allies to continue The Great Game against Russia.

    • @dineshpratapupadhyay6583
      @dineshpratapupadhyay6583 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly!

    • @zaina5569
      @zaina5569 2 роки тому

      Same with Bangladesh? They’re pretty secular bro….please read jinnahs speeches before proclaiming your verdicts, ugh

    • @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239
      @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239 2 роки тому +11

      @@zaina5569 speeches don't count boy, actions do! We know what was the feelings of jinnah for Hindus, with him announcing "direct action"!
      Hindus have shrunk from 14%to 8% in Bangladesh ! Too much for secularism ya!

    • @khanf13
      @khanf13 2 роки тому +3

      I’m Pakistani and I don’t understand why some Indians will push this narrative Jinnah wanted a secular state. Jinnah wanted political Islam, he just didn’t live long enough to write the constitution.

  • @Drkp23
    @Drkp23 2 роки тому +44

    Surprising that SG sir didn’t choose to talk about assassinated ex president ABE … which would have been contemporary topic

    • @wewerealiensandsheets75
      @wewerealiensandsheets75 2 роки тому +1

      What is there to talk about the assassination of Mr Abe ? It is already out

    • @wewerealiensandsheets75
      @wewerealiensandsheets75 2 роки тому +2

      @Mreizrq_Zqhruma I mean pakistan military general who is actually responsible for promoting global terrorism is far more important to me than Abe

    • @shamshudashamshuda6258
      @shamshudashamshuda6258 2 роки тому

      Coz,we should know those responsible for creating confusion n caous,even world leaders today who are terrorist in nature Should be brought b4 public
      What about those responsible for spoiling Iraq afg in the name of terrorism, just coz you are well equipped ,you can't wage war on innocent people.
      Wait n watch what God has his plans for arrogant boasters

  • @dandmello5283
    @dandmello5283 Рік тому +4

    ❤ Love to ShekarGupta for his uncanny but truly a Educative for sure.. the profession of a
    Dedicated Journalists

  • @mozammelhoque7435
    @mozammelhoque7435 2 роки тому +2

    You are absolutely right.
    Thanks
    Toronto.

  • @GinzaGeorge
    @GinzaGeorge 2 роки тому +9

    This is incredible. Thanks for taking time to put this out for us.

  • @orunabho
    @orunabho 2 роки тому +44

    Overdose of Pakistan. There are 200 other countries and half a dozen neighbors.
    This obsession with Pakistan is now getting little irritating. Is it the punjabi obsession? Same thing that killed Pakistan.
    Maybe a discussion on Tamilnadu politics and their breakaway tendencies would be interesting or anything else.

    • @sundareshkrishna6457
      @sundareshkrishna6457 2 роки тому +1

      It’s fascinating……continue SG sir, loved it……..btw….SG is not a Punjabi……..

    • @madhavsakariya6764
      @madhavsakariya6764 2 роки тому +14

      "That's just like your opinion, man" (Said Lebowski).
      Pakistan is one of the most bizarre & interesting countries. Also a nuclear armed neighbour with common history. You can never have enough of Pakistan, even if you take only entertainment.

    • @AjayTiwari-en9nz
      @AjayTiwari-en9nz 2 роки тому +2

      Because there are lessons to learn from Pakistan.

    • @holywarrior5719
      @holywarrior5719 2 роки тому

      SG is very right . Tamil Nadu is becoming another Bengal, an useless state

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 роки тому +1

      Britain's and NATO's obsession with the Great Game, everlasting hostility towards Russia, makes the Grand Indus Army that owns, occupies and ru(i)ns Pakistan, important.

  • @partharora8506
    @partharora8506 2 роки тому +23

    Nah, I have to disagree with you on this one. Neither did Nehru, Indira, or Zia had the most lasting impact. It has to be narasimha rao, Nothing comes near to the path he set up for us in 1991, it has led us to where we are now and where we will be in the future.

  • @secularcommieturdpracharak8321
    @secularcommieturdpracharak8321 2 роки тому +10

    Pakistan is not a country it's a mindset ~ JSD

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +4

      Agree, but mindsets are bound to change.

    • @Unknown-or2vu
      @Unknown-or2vu 2 роки тому

      @@srinivasrao941 islam will always be within pakistan

  • @HarshadContractor
    @HarshadContractor 2 роки тому +32

    Superb analysis, Shekar Ji, I re-learned this conversion to fundamentalist Islamism, today, through your analysis. Salute you, Sir.

  • @ajmersingh3043
    @ajmersingh3043 2 роки тому +6

    Pakistan`s Zia ul-Haq was stationed in Jordan from 1967 to 1970 as a Brigadier.Pakistani and Jordanian army massacred twenty-five thousand Palestinians in Jordan`s refugee camp when they rioted because of poor living conditions.The dreadful event is known as "Black September"

  • @nishankpatil7404
    @nishankpatil7404 2 роки тому +65

    Dear Shekhar sa'ab
    Please make CTC on internal politics of China, prospects of Mr Xi's third term, also please convey the message how powerful/weak is China currently in backdrop of Evergrande/economic slowdown/taming of business tycoons etc.
    Is anti-Xi coalition is cropping up?
    Yours faithfully
    Watching CTC since 2019

    • @ravindra7791
      @ravindra7791 2 роки тому +4

      Nobody knows what is happening in China. Not even the best China watchers in West or even many Chinese. SG might not be in a position to do this analysis.

    • @1525boy
      @1525boy 2 роки тому +2

      @@ravindra7791 Exactly, how is SG supposed to have that information? I’m not sure anyone outside China 🇨🇳 has that information.

  • @suneel7053
    @suneel7053 2 роки тому +53

    SG sir. Thank you very much for the fantastic history explainer. Also may I suggest Sri Lanka protests as a topic for any upcoming CTC episode. Thank you sir.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 роки тому +1

      Hi Sunil, thanks for writing in with your valuable feedback.

  • @sujalgarewal2685
    @sujalgarewal2685 2 роки тому +2

    Mr Gupta, pls archive your cut the clutters, they are a goldmine. We will need this for the future.

  • @rahulranjan1926
    @rahulranjan1926 2 роки тому +18

    I have taken the subscription today and feels great to watch this CtC as a member, first. Guys do take the print's subscription to support unbiased, uninfluenced journalsim.

    • @chanakyabharat756
      @chanakyabharat756 2 роки тому +8

      I'm a subscriber too but don't think all print members are neutral, I took subscription for Shekhar ji, DK , NP but completely ignore Sanghvi and Jyothi who openly show bias.

    • @impedimenta934
      @impedimenta934 2 роки тому

      they dont claim to be unbiased. They claim to be honest and fair, there is a difference that, a person who watches Indian television media cannot understand. Nobody can be unbiased, everyone has an ideology, and even Judges are not unbiased. People have to understand the difference between blatant propaganda and truth.

    • @rvnrr
      @rvnrr 2 роки тому

      Shekhar is good. Closest to an unbiased view. But Print is like other MSM.

    • @impedimenta934
      @impedimenta934 2 роки тому

      @@rvnrr The print is shekhar and Shekhar is the print

  • @vkchoudhary1960
    @vkchoudhary1960 2 роки тому +10

    "Partyless democracy is like a non-alcoholic beer"😊😊

  • @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA
    @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA 2 роки тому +6

    Zia ul Haq Was the One who made truly Islam Religion of Peace into Piece
    For themselves & also for rest of the World....

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +2

      Because Islam has an undefined definition “Jihad”.

  • @veenjharmemon8097
    @veenjharmemon8097 2 роки тому +6

    I am from Pakistan and I must say that Mr. Shekhar has a great understanding of Pakistani politics. Zia continues to haunt us all.

    • @Unknown-or2vu
      @Unknown-or2vu 2 роки тому

      No he don’t be quite

    • @jameshardley9793
      @jameshardley9793 Рік тому

      @@Unknown-or2vu -----he was your soul mate, But he was the worst thing ever happened to Pakistan

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN 2 роки тому +18

    Basic cause of all the miseries in the world today is traceable to Islam. The day Islam was born is the most unfortunate day in the history of the mankind. Why blame Zias, Aurangzeb, khalji, Ghazni and tughlaqs? Islam sanctified violence.

  • @raw3165
    @raw3165 2 роки тому +6

    More than Zia's coup, your coup was far more brutal, Coupta ji

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      I do not find a smiley in this stupid Iphone

  • @sandy3426143
    @sandy3426143 2 роки тому +6

    “Not just to his country, but his nation!” - SG 2

  • @peterhumphrys
    @peterhumphrys 2 роки тому +6

    This was a very informative presentation, I really enjoy listening to Shekhar's analyses.

  • @matineetime1940
    @matineetime1940 2 роки тому +4

    He is remembering zia more than Pakistani media.

  • @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi
    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you, great history lesson put in context, this is the first time these things make sense to me.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 роки тому +1

      Hi,
      Glad it was helpful! Thank you for your contribution to our channel.

  • @ZaidBinFarooq
    @ZaidBinFarooq 2 роки тому +16

    As usual a good brief on Pakistani politics from Shehkar sb. Loved the way he always add a story to the whole context.

  • @vaibhavgupta7197
    @vaibhavgupta7197 2 роки тому +36

    Even Government of India, does not give this much focus, attention to Pakistan and Pakistani politics, that Shekar Gupta (CTC) does.

    • @abhijitsharma7425
      @abhijitsharma7425 2 роки тому +5

      lol read some books my guy

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +7

      Because Pakistan is our internal issue.

    • @psr4550
      @psr4550 2 роки тому

      Han tereko jaise bahut pata hai, chodu

    • @sumondutta1101
      @sumondutta1101 2 роки тому

      RAW would have a bunch scholars on every country of interest.

    • @sivag2032
      @sivag2032 Рік тому

      SG is patron of Pak like sanjay manjerakar in cricket.

  • @Sid-MMA
    @Sid-MMA 2 роки тому +4

    Very interesting. Shekhar has unmatched political insight.

  • @1954Saleem
    @1954Saleem 2 роки тому +7

    Very well presented . Vajpayee's quote was most appropriate . Pakistan has been affected most by Zia .

  • @rajendranathanmnair4122
    @rajendranathanmnair4122 2 роки тому +12

    You have provided a real valuable insight into jehadi culture and it is a real threat in Kerala state where from funding is being provided for pan India operation other than may be in Bengal, Assam and J&K.

  • @rishabh3270
    @rishabh3270 2 роки тому +2

    What a superb analysis Shekhar Sir!! 👏

  • @AnilKumar-um4dg
    @AnilKumar-um4dg 2 роки тому +2

    Art of Story Telling!!! SG sir, superb!!

  • @ravisehgal.2694
    @ravisehgal.2694 2 роки тому +5

    Today only Me & A friend both Army Veterans discussed this Chap. Issue is the present generation is unaware how things changed during the period.

  • @shauryakhatana
    @shauryakhatana 2 роки тому +1

    Pakistan called Fatima jinnah an Indian agent this is Pakistan’s legacy

  • @nadeemafzal4698
    @nadeemafzal4698 2 роки тому +36

    Being a Pakistani, I appreciate your in-depth knowledge about Pakistan and giving your time to topics related to Pakistan
    Although at time you become unnecessarily patriotic when talking about Pakistan but it’s completely natural
    Overall I appreciate your Analysis...

    • @guurindersinghsfather1068
      @guurindersinghsfather1068 2 роки тому

      At least "unnecessarily patriotic" people have forex reserves of 590 billion dollars not like bankrupt "unnecessarily r@dical" g-hadists who don't have money to import tea

    • @nadeemafzal4698
      @nadeemafzal4698 2 роки тому

      @@guurindersinghsfather1068
      Your comment is a true example of unnecessary patriotism (in your case it is fake hyper nationalism)
      Indians are not realizing that in the world India has lost its soft power. It’s dangerous for the fabric of secular India.

    • @jaspeeetkaur5608
      @jaspeeetkaur5608 2 роки тому +16

      Basic moral of the story was, the day Pakistan was made Pakistani wanted to loot its money, not a single good person ruled their and nobody thought they need to work on “ law” social structure education health or science… end result is in 2022 Pakistan is on edge of bankruptcy
      So we can define Pakistan as from “1947 to 2022” that’s life story of a land made on the name of islam, land got destroyed on the name of islam
      Basically allah k liye paida huye , allah allah krte mar gye .. bich bich main bas aas pados ko dukhi kia …

    • @abidfarooqui-sla3301
      @abidfarooqui-sla3301 2 роки тому +4

      @@jaspeeetkaur5608 Kind of true. But don't be overjoyed. India's debt is USD 620 billion versus 122 billion for Pakistan. Per Capita each Indian owes 4 times that of Pakistan. Foreign currency reserves and issues that Pakistan has can be solved. Indian debt to GDP has been heading the wrong way and has been under Modi but a level of misdirection solves many problems in politics. Old politician trick.

    • @psr4550
      @psr4550 2 роки тому

      @@abidfarooqui-sla3301 Han aur bhok le, hum bhik ni mangte imf se lodu

  • @aftabahmad6099
    @aftabahmad6099 2 роки тому +5

    I am not aware of the influence of Gen Zia on India but here in Pakistan the legacy of his impact has been a disastrous and still continue his legacy also included the Sharif brothers who consider him thier political father both of whom are corrupt & involved in Money Laundering

    • @kaidi_p
      @kaidi_p 2 роки тому

      the whole Khalistan project was Zia's gift to India

  • @bling97
    @bling97 2 роки тому +2

    Excellent Excellent episode... i watch cut d clutter before going to sleep...extremely satisfied vd d knowledge gained...

  • @pharaohakhneton9553
    @pharaohakhneton9553 2 роки тому +20

    Islam in Pakistan has produced strange and contradictory characters . Bhutto , a Democrat sow the seeds of islamization, which was further nurtured by a still peculiar character in uniform , Zia-Ul-Haque ,who turned his country into a modern global jihadi centre. So effective, it is the Bhutto ,who is the father and grand-master of jihadi outfits with Zia as his disciple. But at the centte of it all is the Islam as the driving for for both of them.
    2). Like Mughals, succession has never been peaceful in Pakistan since its birth. In this the Pakistanis are emulating mughals, if not in culture.

    • @totensrabon1885
      @totensrabon1885 2 роки тому

      Mughals built this subcontinent & most of them were secular to the core... You probably blinded by your hateful Hindutva ideology, but that Doesn't change the history.

    • @millennialmind9507
      @millennialmind9507 2 роки тому

      West bengal political succession has a similar story 🤔🧐?

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      Maybe “Allah” will send another dictator to set things right.

    • @Aiasmor
      @Aiasmor 2 роки тому

      Mughals would spit on Pakistan, and I say this as a Sikh.

  • @historyfromarchivestolimel8662
    @historyfromarchivestolimel8662 2 роки тому +2

    ziaism is a lesson for India too. No matter what religion and state should be separated at any cost

  • @aspmusic5904
    @aspmusic5904 2 роки тому +2

    Very eyeopening episode, Shekharji. Great anecdotes too.

  • @sustainabledevelopment8965
    @sustainabledevelopment8965 2 роки тому +2

    Jinnah did not imagine it to be a Islamic republic .. joke 😂

  • @sirajuddinchanda3818
    @sirajuddinchanda3818 2 роки тому +10

    As far his impact on India is concerned, I think it was his policy on Khalistan movement. But I didn’t see any mention of it in your article.

  • @garvitbhardwaj
    @garvitbhardwaj 2 роки тому +6

    Gupta ji should write a book on his journalist career experience

  • @jaibaba3848
    @jaibaba3848 2 роки тому +7

    Pakistan was bound to go in that way. if not Zia ul haq, someone else would have taken them towards extreme Islamist ideology. Just like Afghanistan went back to extremism, paxtanis will also go the same way.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +1

      Not until another “ Zia” is sent by Allah, if at all.

  • @AlidelOro
    @AlidelOro 2 роки тому +1

    Gupta Ji you are a rockstar! Keep up the good work 👍🏼

  • @keshav4408
    @keshav4408 2 роки тому +4

    Modi will be most important person in India in first 100 years of independence

    • @neerajkumar-ts6om
      @neerajkumar-ts6om 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah some of his policies on internal affair are similar to that of zia-ul-haq

    • @aakash26159
      @aakash26159 2 роки тому

      @@neerajkumar-ts6om can you name some. I am keen to know.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      Only few would know, you are lucky to be the one amongst.

  • @indermohansinghmalhotra3730
    @indermohansinghmalhotra3730 2 роки тому +2

    Fabulous recapitulation & analysis! 👍

  • @blackbirds1440
    @blackbirds1440 2 роки тому +14

    The most important personality in this region in our lifetime is former pm Sri PV Narsimha Rao. Nobody can surpass the impact he created by his policy making.

    • @OrangePumpkin150
      @OrangePumpkin150 2 роки тому +1

      The best PM we ever had.

    • @mkbskb1
      @mkbskb1 2 роки тому

      @@OrangePumpkin150 no way devgora was and is till date the best Indian PM

  • @jackshrimp
    @jackshrimp 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks SG, for a gr8 analysis!! What a world of difference from the other channels of Lallu n Panju, Nation wants to know, No spin, Big Debate etc

  • @reddyguntuku1024
    @reddyguntuku1024 2 роки тому +4

    Regarding Zia ul-Haq: Perhaps 'most consequential' not 'most important.'

  • @zcacdyj
    @zcacdyj 3 місяці тому

    Great perspective thank you 🔥🙏

  • @vivekanandholla6730
    @vivekanandholla6730 2 роки тому +2

    Zia has in a sense brought Pakistan to its knees over time. Thank you for a nice video

  • @mehrxavia3128
    @mehrxavia3128 2 роки тому +4

    I live in Pakistan, and sometimes I wonder will Pakistan Really Collapse just because of Economy, The answer is no. Why? Pakistan is never dependent on economy, The economy is for ruling elites to make more reserves, get luxury items, smuggle goods to AFG and other central states. There is no check and balance, Otherwise we see cheapest oil at some places as well, its just that is from Banned neighbors and is used by people to get extra benefit ( you know what I mean ). We see lots of $$ being traded by people in private sector, which is even more than people can imagine.
    Moral of story: Whenever Pakistan collapses it wont be because of economy and it never was an economy issue😅. It will be because of its ruling Elite.

  • @youthink5552
    @youthink5552 2 роки тому +2

    Had Pakistan been a part of INDIA. Hindus would be working and Pakistanis enjoying free rations and medical facility without working and attacking Hindus as well

  • @IqbalKhan-hn7ii
    @IqbalKhan-hn7ii 11 місяців тому

    Your analysis is great.

  • @ranajoysen6377
    @ranajoysen6377 2 роки тому +2

    Dear Mr. Gupta:
    Thank you for the great presentation.
    Former Pakistani President and CMLA General Zia -ul - Haque was possibly the most skilled dictator to rule a country.
    He worked through the matrix of America-Soviet rivalry, enmity with India, and efforts to entrench his own power very effectively to determine results conducive for him.
    For quite some time matters went quite well for him. But, subsequently as is the case with almost all dictators, resentments started coming out like steam from a pressure cooker. Opposition to him was growing within the country, Russians were threating him, and relations with India reflected perpetuation of mistrust laced with surface courtesies.
    Perhaps most important was the collective aftermath of paranoia, tyranny, aggressive predilection, and religious extremism in Pakistan.
    His death from an unresolved plane crash was above all the aftermath of the social turbulence and orgy in Pakistan. The initiator tragically became its own victim, after causing misery for so many.
    As the world struggles with coping economic hardships, political high-handedness, and religious fundamentalism, we in India would have to keep devising methods to manage our relations with Pakistan effectively.
    After all, as the illustrious political commentator and editor, Inder Malhotra, once put it, India would have to learn to live with Pakistan as any less fortunate person does with a bad kidney.
    General Zia's long stint in power in Pakistan has made the India's relations with Pakistan more prolonged and more challenging.
    With Regards,
    Ranajoy Sen

  • @crawfordsmith3700
    @crawfordsmith3700 2 роки тому +6

    Dear Sir ~
    I thank you for your presentation. It provides a clear perspective upon a complicated history across multiple cultures , societies and politics.

  • @prasadakn9982
    @prasadakn9982 2 роки тому

    Thank you Guptaji.This is education.

  • @imrantahir2950
    @imrantahir2950 2 роки тому

    Very good analysis and research

  • @Aryan-ye4mp
    @Aryan-ye4mp 2 роки тому +18

    You are to obsessed with Pakistan...
    There are many important topics within India and in geopolitics (except pakistan) as well...
    Enough of this jokistaan

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 роки тому

      The Great Game will spill over into India because of NATO warmongering.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      Jokistan is our Internalistan.

    • @chandrakanthotkar7262
      @chandrakanthotkar7262 2 роки тому +1

      How we can learn about religious fundamentalism if don't discuss the culprit.

  • @slingblade8129
    @slingblade8129 2 роки тому +2

    People here commenting that Pakistan was always a fundamentalist country should do some reading of subcontinental politics. While Pakistan was envisioned as a motherland for subcontinental Muslims, the founding fathers could hardly be called fundamentalists. In fact, early Pakistani leaders were very much from the same fabric as the early Indian leaders. The difference is that early Indian leaders did a good job of keeping the military professional, building fairly robust democratic institutions and avoiding fundamentalist blowback. Pakistan could not do that. And over time, the failure of the 'system' allowed the regression to fundamentalism.
    And those saying the anti-India POV in Pakistan stems from Islamic fundamentalism - I'd argue that by the same definition, the Afghan population (and the Middle East too) could also be construed as fundamentalists. Why isn't the anti-India sentiment as strong there as it is in Pakistan? Nepal is not an Islamic country, why is the anti-India sentiment so strong there? We must acknowledge that the Indo-Pak hostility has a historical/geopolitical/cultural aspect to it too. Calling Pakistan "rotten from the start" is an excuse to ignore the nuances of human character and history.

  • @daddashikamani
    @daddashikamani 2 роки тому +4

    There are some common misconceptions peddled here by SG.
    Jinnah didn't intend Pak to be Islamic state and said so in 1947. However, Jinnah retracted his statement soon after and said in Jan 11 in Karachi Bar Association: "I could not understand a section of people who deliberately wanted to create mischief and made a propaganda that the constitution of Pakistan would not be made on the basis of Shariat.”
    Sharia based Constitution cannot be considered Secular.

    • @ashishsunny7963
      @ashishsunny7963 2 роки тому

      Pakistan was formed as "Islamic Republic of Pakistan".
      If its an islamic republic, then it can never be a secular nation.

    • @chandrakanthotkar7262
      @chandrakanthotkar7262 2 роки тому

      Just like Quran, People take what they are good with it.
      Jinnah made two opposite statements on same points.
      Islamist refer to Constitution based on Sharia.
      And secular refer to his other speech.
      In the conflict, As of now Islamist has won in Pakistan.
      I don't see changes in nation for next 20 years.
      Salafi and Wahabi movement destroyed South Asia.

  • @bharatindian6633
    @bharatindian6633 2 роки тому +1

    Zia impacted the Indian librandus only, no one else.

  • @ashishmodi1574
    @ashishmodi1574 2 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @kunalpriyadarshi345
    @kunalpriyadarshi345 2 роки тому +1

    MJ Akbar has time and again argued that Islamization began under Ayub Khan.

  • @Liguritio
    @Liguritio 2 роки тому +10

    Every politician from Pakistan is a character. Times have changed now,
    Ab, IMF Nachayega, US chakrayega aur China Satayega.
    Sad that this Nation couldn’t give anything to the world except terror and destruction. Now its self destroying.

  • @Suresh_Kamath
    @Suresh_Kamath 2 роки тому +4

    I so remember Zia changed the laws that a woman's testimony on court was valued at half that of a man's testimony

  • @MichelMawon4982
    @MichelMawon4982 Рік тому

    I love your stories. I think you're really good at it.

  • @arindamkumar7725
    @arindamkumar7725 2 роки тому +3

    Learnt a new word: 'Obsequious'

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      I’ve rewinded it multiple times to know the spelling, thanks for helping.

  • @saadatkhan28
    @saadatkhan28 2 роки тому

    Haye mashallah kitni khubsoorti se aur bghair kisi Baisness k analysis kiya hai
    I haven't observed any India journalists so unbiased

  • @rvnrr
    @rvnrr 2 роки тому +1

    VP Singh also had an enduring impact given his brief tenure. Caste politics.

  • @sanjaybajare6371
    @sanjaybajare6371 2 роки тому +12

    Sir why you people only talk about pakistan.not our states like South india

    • @TheNewDelhiDossier
      @TheNewDelhiDossier 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah, I would rather like to see a discussion on Swargiya K. Kamaraj or Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi

    • @ashxz
      @ashxz 2 роки тому +3

      He's a north Indian living in Delhi. Most probably he would be more aware of the history of Pakistan than of either Noth Eastern or Southern India

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      Because Pakistan is our internal issue.

  • @NaveedKhan-qj5st
    @NaveedKhan-qj5st 5 місяців тому

    Well said😘

  • @srinivasrao941
    @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +1

    I am going to watch this video so many times

  • @thatswhatshesaid7935
    @thatswhatshesaid7935 2 роки тому +8

    SG sir There are many topics in India to cover 🙃🙏

  • @subhashvyas3877
    @subhashvyas3877 2 роки тому +1

    Appreciate your knowledge on many subjects .also ypur unusual analysis, sir congratulations and respect

  • @rawalji
    @rawalji 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this historical story.

  • @ranjitkamath2417
    @ranjitkamath2417 2 роки тому +5

    SG loves Pakistan and covers Pakistan more than due

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому +1

      Because Pakistan is our internal issue.

  • @zaina5569
    @zaina5569 2 роки тому +2

    Lanat on Zia ul haq; from the whole Pakistan

  • @akshayhiremath4584
    @akshayhiremath4584 2 роки тому +5

    Seems Zia was the living manifestation of Shekharji’s quote “No one can stop bad idea whose time has come”

  • @advaitk1908
    @advaitk1908 2 роки тому +1

    Zia is the only reason why kashmir is unstable

  • @Evan3783
    @Evan3783 2 роки тому +2

    Comeon Shekhar Ji.. look at Pak now. If he left a damn lasting so called legacy why is his country so backward now? Indian leaders on the contrary were poised and calm and lifted up the country.

  • @neerajgautam8583
    @neerajgautam8583 2 роки тому

    Brilliant analysis.

  • @akaj188
    @akaj188 2 роки тому +2

    When I was in college,( St. Stephen's College , Delhi, (1975-80) ,for some time, Presidents of both Pakistan ( Gen Zia ) and India ( Fakhrudin Ali Ahmad ) were ex-students of our college.

  • @meetadi4u
    @meetadi4u 2 роки тому +2

    Did Zia Islamise Pakistan mind or reflect that mind ? Elites may have not been islamised but masses were always close to Zias ideology

  • @subhashvyas3877
    @subhashvyas3877 2 роки тому +1

    Even you agree that radicalism and fundamentalism any where will stop economic progress

  • @maheshwarmahalle9003
    @maheshwarmahalle9003 2 роки тому +4

    We should discuss more on china only barrier is
    Mandarin

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 роки тому

      No, Pakistan is our internal issue and until it is resolved we cannot get away from it.

  • @kashyapnegandhi
    @kashyapnegandhi 2 роки тому +2

    Really good analysis which is usually missed by a lot of who don’t did too much into why something had happened and who were the players and politics behind the event.

  • @jasonparker7463
    @jasonparker7463 Рік тому

    Real words yours ...sir

  • @rajeshtanwar2445
    @rajeshtanwar2445 2 роки тому

    SG Sir,
    Wow!!!
    This post facto analysis of yours on General ZiaulHaque of Pakistan, is 360 degrees comprehensive.
    Your research is commendable.