Yes this is a reupload, but I accidently put a 30fps clip on my timeline so the entire prior video was in 30fps! This one is 60fps after editing it extentisely because the whole timeline was ruined, I am reuploading because I'd like you all to enjoy this video in the absolute best format possible hope ya'll enjoy :) .
And A95L won TV shootout again. Twice in a row. Same model being Crowned as KING of the TV. Anyhow to be honest. A95L is the Best OLED TV/Monitor bar none. Because it got processing of SONY TV and ease of setup similar to Monitors. With LG and SAMSUNG there is lot of tweaking needed to get it working properly on different games. Specially LG. SONY is simple set once forget deal where we don't have to tweak again for different games as it nails it down for every game.
I got good number of friends who purchased the 55" A95L purchased since last year to be used as main PC Monitor. All they did is purchase 42" deep Countertop and use it as a desk with it 4-6" away from wall for cable management. With TV mounted to the Wall. It gets them seated at perfect distance where 55" TV is immersive but also fits well in field of view to be comfortable.
I have C2 65" connected to my PC (bed gaming with good distance) and I'm loving it but the only problem is not all games can be played on TV. That's why I am planning on buying an OLED 32 inch 4K 240hz which will fix the problem and the best part is I can switch between those OLEDs depending on the type of the game I wanna play :D
The S95D lost to the A95L in Cinema and Filmmaker Mode by .06 for movies and streaming, so it's a virtual tie. But that isn't the unlocked mode (Standard, Dynamic, or pushed Cinema) In gaming, it is significantly better and brighter as the full panel is being utilized. I appreciate your content, im a new subscriber
I think the decision is made from the start with the size. Either way, OLED monitors are very expensive and most use old OLED panels. I rather have a “work” LCD screen and then my OLED TV for everything else.
I went with LG C4 48 inch. I wanted the 42 inch but LG at the time of purchased sold the 42 inch at the same exact price as the 48 inch. Prior to the purchase I used 48 inch Sony 900E as my primary, and LG 32 inch 166 hz 1440P VA panel LCD as my secondary monitor. The VA panel only looks good during the day. At night, image quality falls apart, or if you're playing a dark game, it has spotches of white in corners and around text. The old Sony just had 60hz in 4K, but 120 HZ in 1080P. Unfortunately, 1080P just looks average to me now. So I wanted something with good HDR, and between 37-48 inches with 42-43 being my desired size. I looked for several months and all had something I didn't like, or was over priced. I don't like curves, and I wanted OLED or mini LED or Micro LCD. Something to minimize blooming or light bleed as my Sony 900E had it as well, but it wasn't too bad for the most part being a FALD. It came down to C3 until the C4 went on sale. I thought the C4 looked a little better in person, not really $200 more, but I had the extra cash so I pulled trigger. It's been over a month, and I've impressed. Much better than Sony and my LG VA panel. I gave the Sony to my mother, I still have the 1440P VA panel, but honestly I have no reason to keep it. I can get high refresh at 144 HZ using custom resolution on m C4. Is there a big difference between 144 HZ and 166? No, not at all, most people couldn't tell in a blind test. Not even a big difference between 120HZ and 166. When you hit 100 HZ, anything to me becomes less noticeable. Besides, I have 5900X CPU, it can push too many more FPS to my 7900XT than 150 FPS in decent quality games like a Call of Duty (Thanks gamepass).
I wasn't considering the S95D in the beginning, but I choose it after many months of side by sides. The S95D gen 3 QD-OLED has been proven to be the best display for gaming. That is my 90% After the Value Electronics shootout, it was only .06 of a point from beating the A95L for movies and streaming
@@Gekko858 so I myself am about 2-3 feet away I’d say any where from 2-4 feet would be the sweet spot 5 would even be fine. 32 inches is larger then you think
@@LordCivickOG thanks for your advice! I have a 27” at the moment so I’m trying to decide if 32” would be too large for viewing on the desk…. Depth is 80cm
If I didn’t play single player games I would’ve got a monitor but I’m been playing on a 55 inch tv all my life so I wouldn’t mind playing competitive games on a tv I can still see pretty good
@@LexLutha Nah I definitely understand that point, this is the First Gen of 4K OLED gaming monitors so I guess they wanted to be careful and not push them to far as not to get burn in. But hopefully the next generation pushes the brightness to TV levels🤞🏾. Thanks for watching!
been using a SAMSUNG 55-Inch Class Neo QLED 4K UHD QN90A Series Mini LED, for a few years now, originally had the 65 inch but swapped it for my brothers 55 since 65" was a bit too big as tv monitor, thinking 55" might be a bit too big still so looking for a 42 or 43" tv my self to use as a monitor
If you you want to use TV as a monitor. Retreat and think again, how you look at such a big area screen in short distance? Your neck will get hurt for long hours at work!
Yes this is a reupload, but I accidently put a 30fps clip on my timeline so the entire prior video was in 30fps! This one is 60fps after editing it extentisely because the whole timeline was ruined, I am reuploading because I'd like you all to enjoy this video in the absolute best format possible hope ya'll enjoy :) .
And A95L won TV shootout again. Twice in a row. Same model being Crowned as KING of the TV. Anyhow to be honest. A95L is the Best OLED TV/Monitor bar none. Because it got processing of SONY TV and ease of setup similar to Monitors. With LG and SAMSUNG there is lot of tweaking needed to get it working properly on different games. Specially LG. SONY is simple set once forget deal where we don't have to tweak again for different games as it nails it down for every game.
I got good number of friends who purchased the 55" A95L purchased since last year to be used as main PC Monitor. All they did is purchase 42" deep Countertop and use it as a desk with it 4-6" away from wall for cable management. With TV mounted to the Wall. It gets them seated at perfect distance where 55" TV is immersive but also fits well in field of view to be comfortable.
I have C2 65" connected to my PC (bed gaming with good distance) and I'm loving it but the only problem is not all games can be played on TV. That's why I am planning on buying an OLED 32 inch 4K 240hz which will fix the problem and the best part is I can switch between those OLEDs depending on the type of the game I wanna play :D
Expensive but the best of both worlds, also I love your Profile Pic :)
@@LordCivickOG yeah hate the price but I won’t regret an Oled. Thanks man 😁
@@LordCivickOG What do you mean ‘’not all games can be played on tv’’? Serious question not trying to be funny
@@JAFG58example: Play competitive Call of Duty on a TV is horrible.
@@niceshot4042so input lag
The S95D lost to the A95L in Cinema and Filmmaker Mode by .06 for movies and streaming, so it's a virtual tie. But that isn't the unlocked mode (Standard, Dynamic, or pushed Cinema)
In gaming, it is significantly better and brighter as the full panel is being utilized.
I appreciate your content, im a new subscriber
I think the decision is made from the start with the size. Either way, OLED monitors are very expensive and most use old OLED panels. I rather have a “work” LCD screen and then my OLED TV for everything else.
I went with LG C4 48 inch. I wanted the 42 inch but LG at the time of purchased sold the 42 inch at the same exact price as the 48 inch. Prior to the purchase I used 48 inch Sony 900E as my primary, and LG 32 inch 166 hz 1440P VA panel LCD as my secondary monitor. The VA panel only looks good during the day. At night, image quality falls apart, or if you're playing a dark game, it has spotches of white in corners and around text. The old Sony just had 60hz in 4K, but 120 HZ in 1080P. Unfortunately, 1080P just looks average to me now. So I wanted something with good HDR, and between 37-48 inches with 42-43 being my desired size. I looked for several months and all had something I didn't like, or was over priced. I don't like curves, and I wanted OLED or mini LED or Micro LCD. Something to minimize blooming or light bleed as my Sony 900E had it as well, but it wasn't too bad for the most part being a FALD. It came down to C3 until the C4 went on sale. I thought the C4 looked a little better in person, not really $200 more, but I had the extra cash so I pulled trigger. It's been over a month, and I've impressed. Much better than Sony and my LG VA panel. I gave the Sony to my mother, I still have the 1440P VA panel, but honestly I have no reason to keep it. I can get high refresh at 144 HZ using custom resolution on m C4. Is there a big difference between 144 HZ and 166? No, not at all, most people couldn't tell in a blind test. Not even a big difference between 120HZ and 166. When you hit 100 HZ, anything to me becomes less noticeable. Besides, I have 5900X CPU, it can push too many more FPS to my 7900XT than 150 FPS in decent quality games like a Call of Duty (Thanks gamepass).
Im just here to say Yukari the goat 😍
S95D is the king display for gaming
I wasn't considering the S95D in the beginning, but I choose it after many months of side by sides.
The S95D gen 3 QD-OLED has been proven to be the best display for gaming. That is my 90%
After the Value Electronics shootout, it was only .06 of a point from beating the A95L for movies and streaming
Sony A95L blows all displays outta water. It is expensive but you really get what you pay for😊
Big Facts I 100% agree!
Would you have a recommended viewing distance from the PG32UCDM?
@@Gekko858 so I myself am about 2-3 feet away I’d say any where from 2-4 feet would be the sweet spot 5 would even be fine. 32 inches is larger then you think
@@LordCivickOG thanks for your advice! I have a 27” at the moment so I’m trying to decide if 32” would be too large for viewing on the desk…. Depth is 80cm
If I didn’t play single player games I would’ve got a monitor but I’m been playing on a 55 inch tv all my life so I wouldn’t mind playing competitive games on a tv I can still see pretty good
When these monitors can get as bright as a G4, I’m all in.
@@LexLutha Nah I definitely understand that point, this is the First Gen of 4K OLED gaming monitors so I guess they wanted to be careful and not push them to far as not to get burn in. But hopefully the next generation pushes the brightness to TV levels🤞🏾. Thanks for watching!
This channel is so underrated. Excellent work Lord
G4 can not obtain the color luminance of the S95D or A95L, not even close. It gets brights from the white subpixel
@@ehenningsen the brightness is more important to me
Your camera makes the tv and monitor look washed@@LordCivickOG
been using a SAMSUNG 55-Inch Class Neo QLED 4K UHD QN90A Series Mini LED, for a few years now, originally had the 65 inch but swapped it for my brothers 55 since 65" was a bit too big as tv monitor, thinking 55" might be a bit too big still so looking for a 42 or 43" tv my self to use as a monitor
Pls ! Answer me, what size is your tv?
Sure lol, it’s 77”
I went with the ucdp version cause of the mat finish
i have a 4k oled monitor and 4k oled tv just get a monitor if u play high refresh on pc get tv if u like movies and play on console
What surround system is that
I have all the components in the description, but arcam receiver, kef speakers and svs subwoofers.
Only the G4 can get up to 1500 due to MLA,the. C4 cannot, doesn't have MLA
The S95D reaches 1800 Nits and even the 2000s in small windows (HDR highlights)
But it's being done with proper color luminance because it is QD-OLED
If you you want to use TV as a monitor. Retreat and think again, how you look at such a big area screen in short distance? Your neck will get hurt for long hours at work!
And you will end up with eyes surgery eventually.